Top Banner
Daniel. M.O. Adjin and Idongesit Williams CMI, Aalborg University Copenhagen [email protected] and [email protected] WWRF29 23-25 October 2012, Berlin, Germany Comparative Analysis between WiMAX and Fibre Optics Backhaul Network Development in Developing countries - The Case of Northern Ghana
21

Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Nov 19, 2014

Download

Education

abrude

A conference presentation comparing cost effectiveness of Wimax to fibre optics in the development of a backhaul technology for rural
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Daniel. M.O. Adjin and Idongesit WilliamsCMI, Aalborg University Copenhagen

[email protected] and [email protected]

WWRF2923-25 October 2012, Berlin, Germany

Comparative Analysis between WiMAX and Fibre Optics Backhaul Network

Development in Developing countries - The Case of Northern Ghana

Page 2: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Outline

• Introduction• Problem Cases• Proposed solution• Methodology• Results• Conclusion and Recommendations

2

Page 3: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

1.Introduction

• This paper highlights the potentials of 2.3Ghz - 2.6 GHz WiMAX Technologies as a Backhaul Access Network Technology in rural areas of third world countries.

• Rationale for 2.3GHz – 2.6 GHz: The lower the frequency, the cheaper the equipment and of course the longer the propagated wavelength.

3

Page 4: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Introduction Contd

• Problem: Rural areas in Northern Ghana and some developing countries have little or no access to broadband internet.

• Exiting Broadband Solution in Ghana Fiber optics (Fixed network)

• Problem with Existing Solution: It is very expensive to deploy fiber optics, considering the cost of fiber optics, the civil works and the number of KM that one has to lay fiber.

Page 5: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

2.Problem Case 1

Coverage of Fibre Optic Cable Network By VODAFONE Ghana (Padi & Adjin, 2012)

Page 6: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Problem Case 2

MTN Fiber Optic Networks Source: (F. Padi & D. Adjin,2012)

Page 7: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Problem case 3

GLO Ghana Fiber Optic Networks Source: F. Padi & D. Adjin

Page 8: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Unification of Cases

Merged Fiber Optic Backbone Networks using Map Merger Source: F. Padi & Adjin

Page 9: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Cost of Access to Fibre optics in Ghana

MTN Source: MTN Ghana (2008)

Page 10: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

3.Proposed Solution

• A Wireless Backhaul WMAN solution is needed to deliver broadband Internet in these rural areas.

• A WMAN based on it’s ability to cover large areas. (2 Square KM to 8 Square KM per cell)

• The frequency must be on the low end of the 802.16 spectrum allocation to enable cheaper cost of equipment and long propagation of the wavelength

Page 11: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Proposed Solution contd

• A PMP and or with a PTP backhaul connectivity

• Any of the 802.16 wireless solutions from 802.16e (BWA) upward.

• The infrastructure should be owned by the Government enabling the network operators to co-locate to deploy last mile network solutions, hence removing the cost of buying spectrum

Page 12: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Why These solutions

• This proposed solution will lead to the deployment of a cost effective Wireless broadband solution in rural Ghana than deploying Fibre Optics. (Wireless vs. Fixed broadband backhaul network)

• The proposed government incentive is aimed at bringing the cost of wireless broadband delivery even lower to enable cheaper deployment of broadband technology which will lead to the accessibility, affordability of broadband Internet Access.

Page 13: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Theoretical Approach

• What broadband backhaul solution will enable the delivery of affordable and accessible broadband solution to rural areas to ensure user satisfaction (Network Availability)?

• Is it the existing Fibre Optic initiative or the proposed solution?

Cheaper cost of deployment

Accessibility of Technology

Affordability of Technology Satisfaction

Page 14: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Expectation Confirmation Theory

Expectation

Perceived Performance

Disconfirmation Satisfaction

If Disconfirmation is +ve, then Satisfaction is confirmed

ECT was first proposed by Oliver (1977)

Page 15: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

4.Methodology

• This is a case study research. Qualitative research methods were employed. This included interviews and on site visits.

• Telephone Interview with a National Communication Authority (NCA) Ghana Official, 5 Wireless backhaul equipment installers and 1 telecom expert.

• On site visit were made to the 10 regional transmission stations to understand how far the fiber optic terminal points were to some villages.

Page 16: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

5.Results

Aspect WiMAX (NITA e-Gov Project)

$US

Fibre optics (NCBC /VODAFONE)

$US Cost * 1 660 398,76 70 000 000 ** 27, 658 325,18

*Cost not from NITA but from ICT regulation Toolkit

*30 base stations at 43000 Euro. ($US 55 262. 25)

** Assuming there were 500 base stations

National Information Technology Agency (NITA)

Average Annual household income in some part of Northern Ghana in 2008 was $US67

Sample Cost of Deploying 802.16e and Fiber Optics in Ghana

Table 1:

Page 17: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Implications with ECT 1

Expectations Performance +ve Disc

-ve Disc

Satisfaction

Delivery of Broadband

Medium/High Yes Non Yes

High Bandwidth High Yes Non Yes

Cost of Access Medium/High Non Yes No

Cost of Deployment

Medium/High Non Yes No

Accessibility Medium/Low Yes Non Yes

Affordability High Non Yes No

EXTRAPOLATED ECT TABLE FOR WIMAX (WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INCENTIVES)

Table 2

Hence the need for proposed solution

Disc = Disconfirmation, + =Positive, - = Negative

Page 18: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Implication with ECT 2

Expectations Performance +ve Disc

-ve Disc

Satisfaction

Delivery of Broadband Speed

High Yes Non Yes

High bandwidth High Yes Non YesCost of Access Low Non Yes NoCost of Deployment

Low Non Yes No

Accessibility Low Non Yes NoAffordability Low Non Yes No

EXTRAPOLATED ECT TABLE FOR FIBER OPTICS

Table 3

Disc = Disconfirmation, + =Positive, - = Negative

Page 19: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Implication on Proposed Solution

Expectations Performance +ve Disc

-ve Disc

Satisfaction

Delivery of Broadband speed

High Yes Non Yes

High Bandwidth High Yes Non Yes

Cost of Access High Yes Non Yes

Cost of Deployment High Yes Non Yes

Accessibility High Yes Non Yes

Affordability High Yes Non Yes

EXTRAPOLATED ECT TABLE FOR WIMAX(WITH GOVERNMENT INCENTIVES)

Table 4

Disc = Disconfirmation, + =Positive, - = Negative

Page 20: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Conclusion

• If broadband internet is to be deployed in rural areas by 2020 to ensure affordability and accessibity, the following conditions has to be fulfilled

The backhaul technology should be wireless/mobile It should be an 802.16 standard The infrastructure should be owned by Government, while the private sector can develop it via Public

private Partnership of direct contracting (Cost of spectrum acquisition is removed in this manner) The interconnectivity fee between the broadband backhaul provider and the last mile providers will be

reduced if the cost of deploying the backhaul is reduced. Last mile providers should co-locate to provide broadband internet in rural areas

Page 21: Comparative Analysis Between Fiber optics and Wimax in Rural Areas

Thank You

Questions ?