Top Banner
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB, Accreditation Assessor Auditor Workshop Atlanta, GA July 22-23, 2010
26

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Esther Howard
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Company Confidential

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

1

AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings

Atlanta, GAJuly 22, 2010

Steve HolladayANAB, Accreditation Assessor

Auditor WorkshopAtlanta, GA

July 22-23, 2010

Page 2: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010

Objectives

• Provide an overview of the NCR’s identified from the witness audits.

• Present in process approach.

• Discuss steps that could have been taken to prevent the NCR’s.

• Rules of engagement.

2

Page 3: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010

Goal

• Provide knowledge/information to the AS auditor pool with the goal to improve auditor/CB performance that will reduce repeat NCR’s which will, in turn, add value to the assessment process and the industry as a whole.

3

Page 4: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 4

• 120 NCR’s in 54 Witnessed Audits (WA)– 2.22 Average per WA

• 50 NCR’s in approx 40 Office Assessments (OA)– 1.25 Average per OA

Overall

Page 5: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 5

• 3 NCR

• DETAIL:– Assigning Auditors who either did not have the

proper NACE code or AS91XX qualifications.

– Client not made aware of the OP assessor.

• LEARNINGS: – Verify auditors are qualified for the full

dynamics of the audit.

– Communicate clearly with the client.

Pre-Audit Assignment

Page 6: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 6

• 11 NCR’s

• DETAIL: 19011, 6.4.1.c– (4) The audit plan did not ID the organizations

functional units and processes to be audited.

• LEARNINGS:– The audit plan ensure the client will have the

proper resources available to the audit.

– Clearly demonstrates what processes are intended to be audited.

Pre-Audit Planning

Page 7: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 7

• 11 NCR’s

• DETAIL: 17021. 9.3.2.1– (2) Audit Planning not effective in assuring the

AQMS is assessed to the min requirements for surveillance audits.

• LEARNINGS:– Ensure the auditors understand where the full

auditing requirements are for surv audits if not clearly ID in the audit plan.

Pre-Audit Planning

Page 8: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 8

• 11 NCR’s

• DETAIL: MD 5 and AS9104– (5) Insufficient Auditor Days in the planning

without clear justification.

• LEARNINGS:– If deviation…..JUSTIFY.

– If the audit is being witnessed, provide to ANAB in the pre-audit information.

Pre-Audit Planning

Page 9: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 9

• 5 NCR’s, several OFI’s.

• DETAIL:– Information missing or not correct in EQM.

– Client Profile form not complete or accurate. (scope, head count, regulatory, ITAR)

• LEARNINGS:– Ensure the person entering information is

knowledgeable about the information.

– Verify with Client and lead auditor before submitting.

Pre-Audit Preparation

Page 10: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 10

• Total of 24 NCR’s

• DETAIL:– Sampling part of an element and making a

conclusion on the whole requirement.

• LEARNINGS:– Audit plan and report accuracy is critical.

On-site Audit Depth of auditing

Page 11: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 11

• DETAIL: – Auditing to the scope of certification is not

adequate.

• LEARNINGS:– Ensuring the scope of certification, scope of

audit and audit plan is consistent.

– Validate the exclusions. Is scope consistent with the QM.

– Ensure the address and scope on the Certificate is correct.

On-site Audit Depth of auditing

Page 12: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 12

• DETAIL: – Not following audit trails when objective

evidence suggest otherwise.

• LEARNINGS:– A plan is a plan. Follow the trail to its natural

conclusion if potential findings are evident.

– Keep head on a swivel. Don’t ignore clear findings.

On-site Audit Depth of auditing

Page 13: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 13

• DETAIL: – Not fully verifying the effectiveness of the

actions taken on nonconformities identified during the previous audit.

• LEARNINGS:– Ensure the evidence is more than a record

review.

On-site Audit Depth of auditing

Page 14: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 14

• 4 NCR’s

• DETAIL:– Design Applicability

• LEARNINGS– More of an issue with AS9110.

On-site Audit Interpretation

Page 15: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 15

• DETAIL:– Not fully auditing Outsourcing when

applicable.

• LEARNINGS– Standard clearly requires “control of such

outsourced processes shall be identified” and therefore subject to audit. Not just a document verification.

On-site Audit Interpretation

Page 16: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 16

• DETAIL:– Changes to the capability listing of the client.

• LEARNINGS– Similar to the scoping discussion. Verify any

changes to the capability listing as this could affect the scope of certification or introduce new processes and technology.

On-site Audit Interpretation

Page 17: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 17

• 11 NCR’s

• DETAIL: – Calling the Clients CA/PA system effective with

ineffective/inadequate correction, root cause or corrective action.

• LEARNINGS:– Deep dive the CA/PA system. Validate the

information. If it doesn’t make since….make the call.

On-site Audit Decisions

Page 18: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 18

• DETAIL:– Soft Grading 8 NCR’s

– Clearly stating findings during the audit and not raising the NCR or improper categorization.

– Accepting informal correction during the audit.

• LEARNINGS– Learn the definitions and follow them. Keep track

of the “verbal” findings identified during the audit. Accepting correction to verbal findings without reporting is consulting.

– As an auditor it is not your job to justify an NCR down.

On-site Audit Decisions

Page 19: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 19

• DETAIL:– Continuing the audit when the audit objectives

are clearly unattainable.

• LEARNINGS:– Only the client can make the decision to

continue an audit.

– There should be a clear conclusion that the objectives are unattainable and reported to the client with options.» At the time this is realized not at the end!!

On-site Audit Decisions

Page 20: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 20

• DETAIL: – Closing meeting does not address all of the

requirements.

• LEARNINGS– Clearly address the CA follow up and impacts

on the existing cert.

– Ensure the CA are presented to the correct requirements.

On-Site Audit Closing

Page 21: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 21

• 22 NCR’s

• DETAIL:– Accuracy of the Audit Report and Checklist to

the observed audit.

• LEARNINGS– Anecdotal evidence should be documented as

such. Same for deductive evidence.

On-site/Off-site Audit Reporting

Page 22: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 22

• DETAIL: – Report not in conformance with

AS9014/AS91XX

• LEARNINGS– Justify/explain all NA.

– Clear evidence to support the conclusion.

– Clear evidence to support the SCOPE.

– Include detailed notes

On Site/Off-Site Audit Reporting

Page 23: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 23

• 3 NCR’s

• DETAIL:– Report did not contain mandatory items.

• LEARNINGS– Ensure the Checklist are complete or

references the location of the information.

– Explain and differences between the information left on site to the published report.

Post Audit Reporting

Page 24: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 24

• 8 NCR’s

• DETAIL: Improper closing of NCR’s and Improper Certification Decision.

• LEARNINGS:– Clear evidence of Correction, RC and CA.

– Ensure persons closing NCR are AEA.

– Ensure the NCR’s are closed with appropriate evidence PRIOR to the cert decision.

Post Audit NCR Closure

Page 25: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010

Office Audit NCR’s

• OASIS data base admin/accuracy

• Verification of Client OASIS data admin

• Justification of auditor days.

• Improper qualification of AS cert decision maker.

• Improper decision made with certification information.

25

Page 26: Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,

Registration Management Committee (RMC)

Atlanta, GAJuly 22-23, 2010 26

Questions