July 11-14, 2016 Compact Refrigeration System for Electronics Cooling Based on a Novel Two-Phase Jet Impingement Heat Sink Pablo A. de Oliveira, Post doctoral researcher Jader R. Barbosa Jr., Associate professor Polo Research Laboratories for Emerging Technologies in Cooling and Thermophysics Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil
19
Embed
Compact Refrigeration System for Electronics Cooling Based ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
July 11-14, 2016
Compact Refrigeration System for Electronics Cooling Based
on a Novel Two-Phase Jet Impingement Heat Sink
Pablo A. de Oliveira, Post doctoral researcherJader R. Barbosa Jr., Associate professorPolo Research Laboratories for Emerging Technologies in Cooling and ThermophysicsFederal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil
July 11-14, 2016 2Purdue Conferences
Learning objectives
1. Introduce an innovative thermal management solution for
electronics cooling, i.e., a two-phase jet impingement heat sink
capable of dissipating high heat loads;
2. Present the compact vapor compression refrigeration system in
which the novel jet heat sink operates;
3. Present a thermodynamic performance evaluation for the
proposed active cooling system.
July 11-14, 2016 3Purdue Conferences
1. Motivation (alternatives for electronics cooling)
2. State of the art
3. The object of investigation
4. Experimental apparatus
5. Experimental analysis of the refrigeration system
6. Summary and conclusions
Outline
July 11-14, 2016 4Purdue Conferences
Alternatives for electronics cooling(a) Two-phase flow enhanced heat transfer schemes
(i) High HTC;(ii) Non-linear relation between the heat flux and
the surface-to-fluid temperature difference;(iii) Expressive reduction of the surface temperature
and its fluctuations.
(b) Direct liquid cooling (sprays and impinging jets)
(i) Eliminate thermal resistances on the component;(ii) Reduction of both weight and volume of the
cooling system.
(c) Active cooling solutions (relies on refrigeration)
Combination of (a), (b) and (c):Hybrid active cooling system
July 11-14, 2016 5Purdue Conferences
Principal findings:
1. Very few investigations have focused on the integration of direct liquidcooling techniques with vapor compression refrigeration systems (Yan etal., 2010; Chunqiang et al., 2012; Tan et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2014; Houet al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015);
2. The existing works used primarily spray cooling and did not devotespecific attention to the miniaturization aspect of the application;
3. Ancillary expansion valves were needed (Yan et al., 2010; Chunqiang etal., 2012; Tan et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2014) and oil-lubricatedcompressors were used (Chunqiang et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2014; Hou etal., 2015; Chen et al., 2015);
4. An active cooling system that integrates two-phase impinging jets andmechanical vapor compression refrigeration cycle has not been reportedyet in the open literature;
5. The thermodynamic performance of these systems was not quantified.
State of the art
July 11-14, 2016 6Purdue Conferences
New compact active cooling systemEnhanced heat
transfer scheme for direct liquid cooling
+Single cooling
device
The object of investigation
Small-scale oil-freelinear motor compressor
July 11-14, 2016 7Purdue Conferences
Experimental apparatus
Refrigerant: R-134a
Secondary fluid: 90%/10% vol. WEG mixture
5
5’
6
July 11-14, 2016 8Purdue Conferences
Experimental apparatus
Condenser dimensions: 154 mm (length)
X 74 mm (width) X 32 mm (height)
Oil-free linear motor R-134a compressor
Setup main components:
July 11-14, 2016 9Purdue Conferences
Experimental apparatus
External dimensions: 80 mm (width) X
80 mm (depth) X 112.5 mm (height)
Two-phase jet heat sink (jet cooler)
July 11-14, 2016 10Purdue Conferences
Experimental apparatus
Internal orifice plenum
Bottom
part of
the jet
cooler
Bottom side of the orifice plenum
July 11-14, 2016 11Purdue Conferences
Experimental apparatusInvestigated parameters: (i) applied thermal load, (ii) number of orifices
and (iii) geometrical arrangement of the orifices (jets)
July 11-14, 2016 12Purdue Conferences
Experimental analysisOperating conditions:Hot reservoir temperature - 25ºC;Compressor inlet superheating - 10ºC;WEG mass flow rate - 180 kg/h;Orifice diameter - 300 µm;Orifice-to-heater distance - 28.84 mm.
First performance metrics: !"#$%
Second and third performance metrics: second-law efficiency &$% and ratio &$%∗
July 11-14, 2016 13Purdue Conferences
Experimental analysis
Proposed by Miner and Ghoshal (2006)
July 11-14, 2016 14Purdue Conferences
Experimental analysisOperating conditions:Hot reservoir temperature - 25ºC;Compressor inlet superheating - 10ºC;WEG mass flow rate - 180 kg/h;Orifice diameter - 300 µm;Orifice-to-heater distance - 28.84 mm.
Lower values for: &()* and +,- + +/(0
July 11-14, 2016 15Purdue Conferences
Experimental analysis
July 11-14, 2016 16Purdue Conferences
Experimental analysis
High evaporation efficiencies(i.e., vapor quality) are
achieved (up to 75%)
Refrigerant mass flow rate increases as a result of density increase at the compressor inlet (due to higher evaporating pressures)
1. The applicability of the novel two-phase jet heat sink in the removal ofhighly concentrated heat loads was demonstrated (up to 160 W and 200W from a 6.4-cm² impingement surface for single and multiple orificeconfigurations, respectively, maintaining the surface temperature lowerthan 40°C with heat transfer coefficients ranging from around 14,000 to16,000 W/(m²K);
2. The thermal performance of both the jet cooler and the refrigerationsystem were evaluated and a comprehensive thermodynamic analysiswas performed using different performance metrics;
3. For a fixed orifice diameter and a fixed jet length, operating the systemwith the multiple orifice configurations resulted in a betterthermodynamic performance than the single orifice configuration;
4. The proposed compact vapor compression cooling solution can befurther developed for specific applications in thermal management ofpower electronics for a variety of stationary and mobile systems (forinstance, hybrid and electric vehicles).
July 11-14, 2016 17Purdue Conferences
Summary and conclusions
July 11-14, 2016 18Purdue Conferences
References
1. YAN, Z. B.; TOH, K. C.; DUAN, F.; WONG, T. N.; CHOO, K. F.; CHAN, P. K.; CHUA, Y. S.Experimental study of impingement spray cooling for high power devices. Applied ThermalEngineering, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1225–1230, jul. 2010.
2. CHUNQIANG, S.; SHUANGQUAN, S.; CHANGQING, T.; HONGBO, X. Development andexperimental investigation of a novel spray cooling system integrated in refrigeration circuit.Applied Thermal Engineering, v. 33-34, p. 246–252, feb. 2012.
3. TAN, Y. B.; XIE, J. L.; DUAN, F.; WONG, T. N.; TOH, K. C.; CHOO, K. F.; CHAN, P. K.; CHUA, Y.S. Multi-nozzle spray cooling for high heat flux applications in a closed loop system. AppliedThermal Engineering, v. 54, n. 2, p. 372–379, may. 2013.
4. XU, H.; SI, C.; SHAO, S.; TIAN, C. Experimental investigation on heat transfer of spraycooling with isobutane (R600a). International Journal of Thermal Sciences, v. 86, p. 21–27,dec. 2014.
5. HOU, Y.; LIU, J.; SU, X.; QIAN, Y.; LIU, L.; LIU, X. Experimental study on the characteristicsof a closed loop R134-a spray cooling. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, v. 61, p.194–200, feb. 2015.
6. CHEN, S.; LIU, J.; LIU, X.; HOU, Y. An experimental comparison of heat transfercharacteristic between R134-a and R22 in spray cooling. Experimental Thermal and FluidScience, v. 66, p. 206–212, sep. 2015.
July 11-14, 2016 19Purdue Conferences
POLO Research Laboratories for Emerging Technologies in Cooling and Thermophysics