Community Systems Progress rpt q1 appendices

8/8/2019 Community Systems Progress rpt q1 appendices

1/39

Prepared by:

Quality Management Team

Community Policy Management Section

Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services

November 30, 2010

Appendices for MH/ DD/ SASAppendices for MH/ DD/ SAS

Community SystemsCommunity Systems

Progress ReportProgress ReportFirst Quarter SFY 2010-2011

July 1 September 30, 2010

NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


2/39

NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services

Appendices for Community Systems Progress Report: First Quarter SFY 2010 - 2011

These appendices are a companion document to the Community Systems

Progress Report. Both the report and appendices are available on the Division's

website at: http://www.ncdhhs.gov/mhddsas/statspublications/reports.

Appendix A contains the data tables for each Progress Indicator in the Report.

Several indicators include county level data.

Appendix B contains a list of Local Management Entities (LMEs) and provides

information on member counties, county and LME population, population density

(persons per square mile) for each county, urban/rural designation, the number of

persons and the percentage of county population enrolled in Medicaid.

Appendix C explains the formulas used for calculating each performance indicator.

Appendix D is included only when a report has been revised. It explains any

revisions that have been made to the report.


3/39



Appendix A: Data Tables For Each

Progress Indicator


4/39



# Persons

% of Persons

Requesting

Services

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

Alamance-Caswell 602 54 9% 54 100% 0 0% 54 100%

Beacon Center 1,268 179 14% 179 100% 0 0% 179 100%

CenterPoint 3,215 580 18% 580 100% 0 0% 580 100%

Crossroads 2,402 716 30% 716 100% 0 0% 716 100%

Cumberland 1,548 191 12% 191 100% 0 0% 191 100%

Durham Center 1,447 248 17% 248 100% 0 0% 248 100%

ECBH 1,637 23 1% 23 100% 0 0% 23 100%

Eastpointe 1,831 469 26% 463 99% 6 1% 469 100%

Five County 1,284 422 33% 421 100% 1 0% 422 100%

Guilford Center 3,074 481 16% 481 100% 0 0% 481 100%

Johnston 932 192 21% 192 100% 0 0% 192 100%

Mecklenburg 2,842 397 14% 397 100% 0 0% 397 100%

Mental Health Partners 1,616 36 2% 36 100% 0 0% 36 100%

Onslow-Carteret 761 129 17% 129 100% 0 0% 129 100%

Orange-Person-Chatham 1,014 185 18% 185 100% 0 0% 185 100%

Pathways 2,173 160 7% 146 91% 4 3% 150 94%

PBH 1,782 1,299 73% 1,115 86% 7 1% 1,122 86%

Sandhills Center 1,579 214 14% 214 100% 0 0% 214 100%

Smoky Mountain Center 3,141 779 25% 764 98% 15 2% 779 100%

Southeastern Center 1,502 151 10% 151 100% 0 0% 151 100%

Southeastern Regional 2,021 121 6% 121 100% 0 0% 121 100%

Wake 3,038 466 15% 466 100% 0 0% 466 100%

Western Highlands Network 2,865 381 13% 381 100% 0 0% 381 100%

STATEWIDE 43,574 7,873 18% 7,653 97% 33 0.4% 7,686 98%

SOURCE: LME quarterly reports to DMH/DD/SAS for the period July 1 - September 30, 2010, received October 20, 2010.

* "Access Available But Not Seen" is defined as a qualified provider was on the physical premises ready to provide immediate care as soon as the consumer was available to receive care, but a

face-to-face service was not provided within 2 hours of the request for services because the consumer was not available within this time frame to receive it.

** "Total Provided Access Within 2 Hours" includes consumers provided emergency care plus consumers provided access but not seen within 2 hours of the request.

INDICATOR 1: Timely Access to Care (Emergent Care)

Total Provided Access Within 2

Hours**LME

# Persons

Requesting

Services

Access Available But

Not Seen in 2 Hours*Determined To Need Emergent Provided Within 2 Hours

Page 4


5/39



# Persons

% of Persons

Requesting

Services

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need


Beacon Center 1,268 367 29% 175 48% 41 11% 98 27%

CenterPoint 3,215 412 13% 337 82% 4 1% 71 17%

Crossroads 2,402 328 14% 300 91% 2 1% 23 7%

Cumberland 1,548 152 10% 146 96% 2 1% 4 3%

Durham Center 1,447 278 19% 183 66% 57 21% 15 5%

ECBH 1,637 113 7% 70 62% 21 19% 43 38%

Eastpointe 1,831 305 17% 305 100% 0 0% 0 0%

Five County 1,284 88 7% 88 100% 0 0% 0 0%

Guilford Center 3,074 382 12% 382 100% 0 0% 0 0%

Johnston 932 150 16% 137 91% 2 1% 0 0%

Mecklenburg 2,842 4 0% 4 100% 0 0% 0 0%

Mental Health Partners 1,616 315 19% 304 97% 4 1% 7 2%

Onslow-Carteret 761 123 16% 105 85% 18 15% 0 0%


Pathways 2,173 218 10% 209 96% 3 1% 5 2%

PBH 1,782 40 2% 32 80% 0 0% 6 15%


Smoky Mountain Center 3,141 677 22% 630 93% 20 3% 27 4%



Wake 3,038 659 22% 555 84% 4 1% 11 2%

Western Highlands Network 2,865 403 14% 363 90% 14 3% 26 6%

STATEWIDE 43,574 6,584 15% 5,668 86% 228 3% 488 7%


* "Offered But Declined" includes consumers that were offered an appointment within the target time frame but declined for personal convenience or necessity and requested a later appointment

or were scheduled for an appointment within the target time frame but called and rescheduled it to a later time.

NOTE: Percentages have been rounded. The sum of percentages across each row are not expected to equal 100%.

INDICATOR 1: Timely Access to Care (Urgent Care)

Scheduled - No Show

LME

# Persons

Requesting

Services

Offered But Declined*Determined To Need Provided Within 48 Hours

Page 5


6/39



# Persons

% of Persons

Requesting

Services

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need

# Persons

% of Persons

Determined To

Need


Beacon Center 1,268 709 56% 417 59% 25 4% 267 38%

CenterPoint 3,215 2,014 63% 1,492 74% 45 2% 477 24%

Crossroads 2,402 1,232 51% 1,083 88% 13 1% 130 11%

Cumberland 1,548 931 60% 846 91% 31 3% 54 6%

Durham Center 1,447 921 64% 768 83% 3 0% 150 16%

ECBH 1,637 1,501 92% 1,207 80% 152 10% 294 20%

Eastpointe 1,831 1,057 58% 999 95% 0 0% 58 5%

Five County 1,284 774 60% 594 77% 32 4% 148 19%

Guilford Center 3,074 1,862 61% 1,551 83% 20 1% 291 16%

Johnston 932 580 62% 353 61% 4 1% 52 9%

Mecklenburg 2,842 2,441 86% 2,188 90% 0 0% 0 0%

Mental Health Partners 1,616 1,245 77% 780 63% 8 1% 457 37%

Onslow-Carteret 761 509 67% 381 75% 10 2% 118 23%


Pathways 2,173 965 44% 630 65% 42 4% 126 13%

PBH 1,782 443 25% 417 94% 0 0% 21 5%


Smoky Mountain Center 3,141 1,685 54% 1,381 82% 14 1% 290 17%



Wake 3,038 1,513 50% 895 59% 34 2% 347 23%

Western Highlands Network 2,865 2,004 70% 1,897 95% 45 2% 62 3%

STATEWIDE 43,574 25,450 58% 20,416 80% 541 2% 3,762 15%


* "Offered But Declined" includes consumers that were offered an appointment within the target time frame but declined for personal convenience or necessity and requested a later appointment

or were scheduled for an appointment within the target time frame but called and rescheduled it to a later time.

NOTE: Percentages have been rounded. The sum of percentages across each row are not expected to equal 100%.

INDICATOR 1: Timely Access to Care (Routine Care)

Scheduled - No Show

LME

# Persons

Requesting

Services

Offered But Declined*Determined To Need Provided Within 14 Calendar Days

Page 6


7/39


8/39


9/39


10/39



INDICATOR 2: Identification of Individuals In Need of Service (Child)

Child MH Child DD Child SA

Number in Need Number Served

Percent of

Population in

Need Served


Percent of

Population in

Need Served


Percent of

Population in

Need Served

Alamance-Caswell Alamance 3,215 1,544 48% 964 135 14% 770 50 6%

Caswell 422 196 46% 126 12 10% 108 3 3%

Total 3,636 1,740 48% 1,091 147 13% 878 53 6%

Beacon Center Edgecombe 1,181 1,153 98% 354 133 38% 296 35 12%

Greene 461 383 83% 138 24 17% 115 5 4%

Nash 2,117 1,175 56% 636 143 22% 526 46 9%

Wilson 1,803 1,261 70% 541 179 33% 436 37 8%

Total 5,562 3,972 71% 1,670 479 29% 1,372 123 9%

Centerpoint Davie 917 356 39% 274 40 15% 242 8 3%

Forsyth 7,775 2,959 38% 2,340 378 16% 1,811 292 16%

Rockingham 1,878 805 43% 563 52 9% 456 61 13%

Stokes 959 360 38% 286 39 14% 259 32 12%

Total 11,529 4,480 39% 3,463 509 15% 2,768 393 14%Crossroads Iredell 3,580 1,320 37% 1,072 163 15% 908 73 8%

Surry 1,563 657 42% 468 83 18% 382 48 13%

Yadkin 815 355 44% 244 38 16% 200 13 7%

Total 5,957 2,332 39% 1,785 284 16% 1,490 134 9%

Cumberland Cumberland 7,653 4,045 53% 2,317 440 19% 1,674 186 11%

Durham Center Durham 5,850 3,953 68% 1,771 501 28% 1,208 169 14%

ECBH Beaufort 970 693 71% 291 77 26% 227 41 18%

Bertie 420 352 84% 126 31 25% 109 13 12%

Camden 184 56 30% 55 11 20% 47 1 2%

Chowan 300 236 79% 90 17 19% 73 2 3%

Craven 2,377 1,247 52% 717 159 22% 500 32 6%

Currituck 455 139 31% 136 27 20% 120 5 4%

Dare 606 225 37% 184 15 8% 131 8 6%

Gates 248 88 35% 74 9 12% 70 2 3%

Hertford 476 285 60% 143 27 19% 118 8 7%

Hyde 92 47 51% 28 4 14% 21 1 5%

Jones 187 142 76% 56 19 34% 51 2 4%

Martin 523 490 94% 157 36 23% 132 18 14%

Northampton 403 385 95% 121 28 23% 97 10 10%

Pamlico 202 222 110% 60 19 31% 53 4 8%

Pasquotank 833 452 54% 252 43 17% 196 4 2%

Perquimans 236 129 55% 71 12 17% 60 2 3%

Pitt 3,312 3,193 96% 998 360 36% 753 122 16%

Tyrrell 73 38 52% 22 2 9% 16 0 0%

Washington 284 422 149% 85 15 18% 68 8 12%

Total 12,182 8,841 73% 3,666 911 25% 2,843 283 10%Eastpointe Duplin 1,273 667 52% 383 66 17% 289 18 6%

Lenoir 1,249 1,088 87% 375 84 22% 299 39 13%

Sampson 1,515 797 53% 455 80 18% 360 30 8%

Wayne 2,711 1,958 72% 817 222 27% 623 79 13%

Total 6,748 4,510 67% 2,031 452 22% 1,570 166 11%

Five County Franklin 1,302 579 44% 391 52 13% 323 23 7%

Granville 1,144 471 41% 345 55 16% 290 30 10%

Halifax 1,186 956 81% 356 75 21% 294 26 9%

Vance 1,053 800 76% 317 77 24% 236 28 12%

Warren 354 252 71% 107 28 26% 90 14 15%

Total 5,039 3,058 61% 1,516 287 19% 1,233 121 10%

Guilford Center Guilford 10,253 5,023 49% 3,080 482 16% 2,459 202 8%

Johnston Johnston 4,048 1,999 49% 1,216 229 19% 964 62 6%

Mecklenburg Mecklenburg 20,650 8,823 43% 6,240 1,262 20% 4,562 336 7%

LMECounty

(Urban/Rural)

Page 10


11/39



INDICATOR 2: Identification of Individuals In Need of Service (Child)

Child MH Child DD Child SA


Percent of

Population in

Need Served


Percent of

Population in

Need Served


Percent of

Population in

Need Served

LMECounty

(Urban/Rural)

Mental Health Partners Burke 1,795 1,181 66% 537 120 22% 455 15 3%

Catawba 3,419 1,791 52% 1,026 153 15% 815 75 9%

Total 5,214 2,972 57% 1,564 273 17% 1,270 90 7%

Onslow-Carteret Carteret 1,054 488 46% 319 57 18% 258 26 10%

Onslow 4,400 1,498 34% 1,336 189 14% 813 17 2%

Total 5,454 1,986 36% 1,655 246 15% 1,070 43 4%

Orange-Person-Chatham Chatham 1,192 536 45% 360 62 17% 278 56 20%

Orange 2,228 1,141 51% 670 198 30% 533 95 18%

Person 782 552 71% 235 72 31% 192 27 14%

Total 4,202 2,229 53% 1,265 332 26% 1,003 178 18%

Pathways Cleveland 2,127 1,745 82% 637 258 40% 533 65 12%

Gaston 4,531 2,853 63% 1,362 361 27% 1,087 108 10%

Lincoln 1,633 820 50% 488 125 26% 413 55 13%Total 8,290 5,418 65% 2,488 744 30% 2,033 228 11%

PBH Cabarrus 4,238 3,287 78% 1,274 516 41% 1,009 105 10%

Davidson 3,419 1,854 54% 1,025 198 19% 843 103 12%

Rowan 2,990 2,709 91% 897 306 34% 730 183 25%

Stanly 1,255 1,375 110% 376 126 33% 306 58 19%

Union 5,000 1,709 34% 1,497 403 27% 1,259 71 6%

Total 16,903 10,934 65% 5,068 1,549 31% 4,147 520 13%

Sandhills Center Anson 548 459 84% 164 51 31% 138 16 12%

Harnett 2,651 1,139 43% 796 84 11% 653 38 6%

Hoke 1,241 693 56% 374 82 22% 285 26 9%

Lee 1,363 550 40% 411 65 16% 309 29 9%

Montgomery 635 374 59% 191 24 13% 145 13 9%

Moore 1,650 702 43% 495 93 19% 409 53 13%Randolph 3,145 1,584 50% 942 126 13% 759 72 9%

Richmond 1,058 973 92% 318 111 35% 261 38 15%

Total 12,291 6,474 53% 3,691 636 17% 2,959 285 10%

Smoky Mountain Center Alexander 785 287 37% 235 20 9% 209 7 3%

Alleghany 191 137 72% 57 23 40% 49 10 20%

Ashe 472 271 57% 142 22 16% 114 21 18%

Avery 291 161 55% 87 10 11% 72 12 17%

Caldwell 1,659 1,041 63% 497 87 17% 412 15 4%

Cherokee 473 381 80% 142 33 23% 120 2 2%

Clay 159 128 81% 48 13 27% 42 1 2%

Graham 168 162 97% 50 6 12% 38 3 8%

Haywood 1,029 1,041 101% 308 84 27% 261 25 10%

Jackson 621 545 88% 187 58 31% 143 14 10%Macon 612 408 67% 185 35 19% 157 7 4%

McDowell 899 512 57% 270 53 20% 216 27 12%

Swain 307 223 73% 92 16 17% 74 8 11%

Watauga 613 290 47% 184 27 15% 153 14 9%

Wilkes 1,379 699 51% 413 59 14% 329 29 9%

Total 9,656 6,286 65% 2,898 546 19% 2,391 195 8%

Southeastern Center Brunswick 1,755 1,298 74% 529 217 41% 445 23 5%

New Hanover 3,518 2,670 76% 1,064 376 35% 812 90 11%

Pender 983 680 69% 294 66 22% 259 20 8%

Total 6,255 4,648 74% 1,887 659 35% 1,516 133 9%

Page 11


12/39


13/39



INDICATOR 3: Timely Initiation and Engagement of Individuals in Service (Mental Health)

County 2 Visits within 14 Days 2nd Service > 14 Days No 2nd Service 4 Visits within 45 Days**

(Urban/Rural) Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Alamance-Caswell Alamance 355 37.2% 231 24.2% 368 38.6% 954 188 19.7%

Caswell 32 28.1% 34 29.8% 48 42.1% 114 16 14.0%

Total 387 36.2% 265 24.8% 416 39.0% 1,068 204 19.1%

Beacon Center Edgecombe 150 32.8% 140 30.6% 167 36.5% 457 99 21.7%

Greene 42 36.8% 34 29.8% 38 33.3% 114 33 28.9%

Nash 175 30.3% 177 30.7% 225 39.0% 577 92 15.9%

Wilson 200 36.2% 173 31.3% 180 32.5% 553 130 23.5%

Total 567 33.3% 524 30.8% 610 35.9% 1,701 354 20.8%

Centerpoint Davie 71 38.6% 74 40.2% 39 21.2% 184 45 24.5%

Forsyth 610 43.0% 330 23.3% 478 33.7% 1,418 364 25.7%

Rockingham 187 33.2% 147 26.1% 229 40.7% 563 114 20.2%

Stokes 115 47.3% 54 22.2% 74 30.5% 243 58 23.9%

Total 983 40.8% 605 25.1% 820 34.1% 2,408 581 24.1%

Crossroads Iredell 258 42.4% 160 26.3% 190 31.3% 608 139 22.9%

Surry 138 30.5% 161 35.6% 153 33.8% 452 65 14.4%

Yadkin 74 42.0% 58 33.0% 44 25.0% 176 34 19.3%

Total 470 38.0% 379 30.7% 387 31.3% 1,236 238 19.3%

Cumberland Cumberland 727 37.3% 488 25.1% 733 37.6% 1,948 456 23.4%

Durham Center Durham 682 43.0% 365 23.0% 540 34.0% 1,587 491 30.9%

ECBH Beaufort 105 49.8% 66 31.3% 40 19.0% 211 62 29.4%

Bertie 30 32.3% 31 33.3% 32 34.4% 93 24 25.8%

Camden 5 25.0% 10 50.0% 5 25.0% 20 1 5.0%

Chowan 41 51.3% 23 28.8% 16 20.0% 80 29 36.3%

Craven 158 30.0% 173 32.8% 196 37.2% 527 82 15.6%

Currituck 28 37.8% 26 35.1% 20 27.0% 74 20 27.0%

Dare 70 48.6% 27 18.8% 47 32.6% 144 43 29.9%

Gates 15 37.5% 13 32.5% 12 30.0% 40 6 15.0%

Hertford 53 40.8% 30 23.1% 47 36.2% 130 35 26.9%

Hyde 6 37.5% 5 31.3% 5 31.3% 16 5 31.3%

Jones 17 27.0% 25 39.7% 21 33.3% 63 9 14.3%

Martin 57 45.6% 25 20.0% 43 34.4% 125 41 32.8%Northampton 66 35.9% 56 30.4% 62 33.7% 184 39 21.2%

Pamlico 27 44.3% 15 24.6% 19 31.1% 61 12 19.7%

Pasquotank 82 35.7% 75 32.6% 73 31.7% 230 57 24.8%

Perquimans 21 39.6% 18 34.0% 14 26.4% 53 15 28.3%

Pitt 363 42.3% 224 26.1% 271 31.6% 858 238 27.7%

Tyrrell 5 27.8% 8 44.4% 5 27.8% 18 2 11.1%

Washington 40 52.6% 15 19.7% 21 27.6% 76 31 40.8%

Total 1,189 39.6% 865 28.8% 949 31.6% 3,003 751 25.0%

LME

Total

Number with

an Initial

Visit

Page 13


14/39





(Urban/Rural) Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number PercentLME

Total

Number with

an Initial

VisitEastpointe Duplin 100 31.4% 105 33.0% 113 35.5% 318 46 14.5%

Lenoir 188 38.1% 174 35.2% 132 26.7% 494 97 19.6%

Sampson 109 34.8% 82 26.2% 122 39.0% 313 70 22.4%

Wayne 338 41.0% 217 26.3% 270 32.7% 825 187 22.7%

Total 735 37.7% 578 29.6% 637 32.7% 1,950 400 20.5%

Five County Franklin 121 27.5% 155 35.2% 164 37.3% 440 77 17.5%

Granville 100 30.7% 103 31.6% 123 37.7% 326 70 21.5%

Halifax 142 24.7% 210 36.5% 224 38.9% 576 91 15.8%

Vance 173 30.5% 150 26.4% 245 43.1% 568 120 21.1%

Warren 47 22.8% 60 29.1% 99 48.1% 206 29 14.1%

Total 583 27.6% 678 32.0% 855 40.4% 2,116 387 18.3%

Guilford Center Guilford 1,069 43.1% 475 19.1% 939 37.8% 2,483 765 30.8%

Johnston Johnston 434 45.8% 218 23.0% 296 31.2% 948 271 28.6%

Mecklenburg Mecklenburg 1,355 40.2% 673 19.9% 1,346 39.9% 3,374 982 29.1%

Mental Health Partners Burke 227 33.7% 193 28.7% 253 37.6% 673 120 17.8%

Catawba 355 31.4% 404 35.8% 371 32.8% 1,130 167 14.8%

Total 582 32.3% 597 33.1% 624 34.6% 1,803 287 15.9%

Onslow-Carteret Carteret 138 39.9% 114 32.9% 94 27.2% 346 69 19.9%

Onslow 365 46.8% 244 31.3% 171 21.9% 780 203 26.0%

Total 503 44.7% 358 31.8% 265 23.5% 1,126 272 24.2%

Orange-Person-Chatham Chatham 67 40.1% 34 20.4% 66 39.5% 167 32 19.2%

Orange 166 37.6% 103 23.3% 173 39.1% 442 107 24.2%

Person 89 29.5% 88 29.1% 125 41.4% 302 44 14.6%

Total 322 35.3% 225 24.7% 364 40.0% 911 183 20.1%

Pathways Cleveland 371 39.4% 243 25.8% 328 34.8% 942 264 28.0%

Gaston 504 33.8% 468 31.4% 520 34.9% 1,492 323 21.6%

Lincoln 125 34.3% 104 28.6% 135 37.1% 364 61 16.8%

Total 1,000 35.7% 815 29.1% 983 35.1% 2,798 648 23.2%

PBH Cabarrus 315 71.6% 11 2.5% 114 25.9% 440 149 33.9%

Davidson 307 70.4% 25 5.7% 104 23.9% 436 131 30.0%

Rowan 267 65.6% 24 5.9% 116 28.5% 407 104 25.6%Stanly 177 68.9% 11 4.3% 69 26.8% 257 72 28.0%

Union 213 75.3% 8 2.8% 62 21.9% 283 96 33.9%

Total 1,279 70.2% 79 4.3% 465 25.5% 1,823 552 30.3%

Sandhills Center Anson 95 44.4% 46 21.5% 73 34.1% 214 66 30.8%

Harnett 239 42.6% 143 25.5% 179 31.9% 561 171 30.5%

Hoke 101 41.1% 52 21.1% 93 37.8% 246 70 28.5%

Lee 104 36.7% 69 24.4% 110 38.9% 283 66 23.3%

Montgomery 90 44.1% 35 17.2% 79 38.7% 204 56 27.5%

Moore 139 35.9% 105 27.1% 143 37.0% 387 80 20.7%

Randolph 334 38.7% 200 23.2% 328 38.1% 862 172 20.0%

Richmond 123 32.0% 105 27.3% 156 40.6% 384 84 21.9%

Total 1,225 39.0% 755 24.0% 1,161 37.0% 3,141 765 24.4%

Page 14


15/39






Total

Number with

an Initial

VisitSmoky Mountain Center Alexander 107 40.4% 75 28.3% 83 31.3% 265 45 17.0%

Alleghany 31 47.7% 15 23.1% 19 29.2% 65 16 24.6%

Ashe 88 34.9% 69 27.4% 95 37.7% 252 42 16.7%

Avery 46 43.8% 30 28.6% 29 27.6% 105 29 27.6%

Caldwell 256 46.4% 118 21.4% 178 32.2% 552 117 21.2%

Cherokee 76 40.0% 36 18.9% 78 41.1% 190 37 19.5%

Clay 27 33.8% 19 23.8% 34 42.5% 80 14 17.5%

Graham 20 29.0% 24 34.8% 25 36.2% 69 8 11.6%

Haywood 203 32.0% 121 19.1% 310 48.9% 634 124 19.6%

Jackson 118 42.6% 41 14.8% 118 42.6% 277 77 27.8%

Macon 82 42.1% 35 17.9% 78 40.0% 195 40 20.5%

McDowell 129 41.7% 86 27.8% 94 30.4% 309 73 23.6%

Swain 53 46.1% 23 20.0% 39 33.9% 115 30 26.1%

Watauga 102 46.6% 52 23.7% 65 29.7% 219 62 28.3%

Wilkes 183 37.2% 151 30.7% 158 32.1% 492 89 18.1%

Total 1,521 39.8% 895 23.4% 1,403 36.7% 3,819 803 21.0%

Southeastern Center Brunswick 266 43.8% 162 26.6% 180 29.6% 608 150 24.7%

New Hanover 575 42.0% 368 26.9% 427 31.2% 1,370 365 26.6%

Pender 116 35.6% 87 26.7% 123 37.7% 326 62 19.0%

Total 957 41.5% 617 26.8% 730 31.7% 2,304 577 25.0%

Southeastern Regional Bladen 94 44.1% 53 24.9% 66 31.0% 213 60 28.2%Columbus 203 45.7% 115 25.9% 126 28.4% 444 148 33.3%

Robeson 479 48.2% 233 23.4% 282 28.4% 994 365 36.7%

Scotland 157 49.7% 75 23.7% 84 26.6% 316 116 36.7%

Total 933 47.4% 476 24.2% 558 28.4% 1,967 689 35.0%

Wake Wake 1,344 42.9% 738 23.5% 1,052 33.6% 3,134 960 30.6%

Western Highlands Network Buncombe 652 46.9% 369 26.5% 369 26.5% 1,390 412 29.6%

Henderson 218 49.8% 97 22.1% 123 28.1% 438 137 31.3%

Madison 59 40.1% 46 31.3% 42 28.6% 147 32 21.8%

Mitchell 32 39.0% 25 30.5% 25 30.5% 82 14 17.1%

Polk 68 54.4% 32 25.6% 25 20.0% 125 45 36.0%Rutherford 177 33.7% 158 30.0% 191 36.3% 526 108 20.5%

Transylvania 77 50.3% 39 25.5% 37 24.2% 153 49 32.0%

Yancey 55 46.2% 35 29.4% 29 24.4% 119 29 24.4%

Total 1,338 44.9% 801 26.9% 841 28.2% 2,980 826 27.7%

Statewide 20,185 40.7% 12,469 25.1% 16,974 34.2% 49,628 12,442 25.1%

Urban Counties 12,272 42.5% 6,829 23.6% 9,786 33.9% 28,887 7,756 26.8%

Rural Counties 7,913 38.2% 5,640 27.2% 7,188 34.7% 20,741 4,686 22.6%

SOURCE: Medicaid and State Service Claims Data, April 1 - June 30, 2010 (first service received) based on claims paid through October 31, 2010.

* Data for PBH is self-reported. ** For persons receiving 2 visits within the first 14 days of service.

NOTE: Percentages should NOT total 100% across the LME or county row.

Page 15


16/39



INDICATOR 3: Timely Initiation and Engagement of Individuals in Service (Developmental Disability)




Caswell 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Total 11 55.0% 2 10.0% 7 35.0% 20 9 45.0%


Greene 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3%

Nash 8 53.3% 3 20.0% 4 26.7% 15 6 40.0%

Wilson 7 58.3% 4 33.3% 1 8.3% 12 4 33.3%

Total 18 43.9% 10 24.4% 13 31.7% 41 13 31.7%


Forsyth 21 67.7% 9 29.0% 1 3.2% 31 16 51.6%

Rockingham 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 10 3 30.0%

Stokes 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0%

Total 29 61.7% 12 25.5% 6 12.8% 47 21 44.7%


Surry 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 1 50.0%

Yadkin 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0.0%

Total 8 66.7% 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 12 7 58.3%

Cumberland Cumberland 37 63.8% 9 15.5% 12 20.7% 58 32 55.2%

Durham Center Durham 18 56.3% 8 25.0% 6 18.8% 32 14 43.8%

ECBH Beaufort 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 6 2 33.3%

Bertie 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%Camden 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Chowan 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0.0%

Craven 4 57.1% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 7 3 42.9%

Currituck 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7%

Dare 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0%

Gates 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Hertford 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 0 0.0%

Hyde 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Jones 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 0 0.0%


Pamlico 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Pasquotank 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0%

Perquimans 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Pitt 7 58.3% 5 41.7% 0 0.0% 12 4 33.3%

Tyrrell 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Washington 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Total 22 55.0% 10 25.0% 8 20.0% 40 15 37.5%

LME

Total

Number with

an Initial

Visit

Page 16


17/39






Total

Number with

an Initial


Lenoir 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3%

Sampson 6 85.7% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 7 5 71.4%

Wayne 11 73.3% 1 6.7% 3 20.0% 15 10 66.7%

Total 18 62.1% 3 10.3% 8 27.6% 29 16 55.2%


Granville 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 3 75.0%

Halifax 2 22.2% 3 33.3% 4 44.4% 9 2 22.2%

Vance 2 22.2% 5 55.6% 2 22.2% 9 1 11.1%

Warren 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0%

Total 10 32.3% 12 38.7% 9 29.0% 31 8 25.8%

Guilford Center Guilford 23 76.7% 4 13.3% 3 10.0% 30 16 53.3%


Mecklenburg Mecklenburg 66 62.9% 18 17.1% 21 20.0% 105 57 54.3%


Catawba 12 80.0% 1 6.7% 2 13.3% 15 8 53.3%

Total 14 70.0% 3 15.0% 3 15.0% 20 10 50.0%


Onslow 3 20.0% 4 26.7% 8 53.3% 15 1 6.7%

Total 8 36.4% 4 18.2% 10 45.5% 22 4 18.2%


Orange 11 68.8% 1 6.3% 4 25.0% 16 4 25.0%

Person 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 5 1 20.0%

Total 13 52.0% 5 20.0% 7 28.0% 25 6 24.0%


Gaston 19 65.5% 3 10.3% 7 24.1% 29 17 58.6%

Lincoln 6 54.5% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 11 6 54.5%

Total 29 49.2% 9 15.3% 21 35.6% 59 26 44.1%

PBH Cabarrus 8 57.1% 2 14.3% 4 28.6% 14 5 35.7%

Davidson 7 87.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 8 3 37.5%

Rowan 9 50.0% 3 16.7% 6 33.3% 18 2 11.1%Stanly 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 6 3 50.0%

Union 15 88.2% 0 0.0% 2 11.8% 17 6 35.3%

Total 42 66.7% 6 9.5% 15 23.8% 63 19 30.2%


Harnett 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 8 4 50.0%

Hoke 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 3 60.0%

Lee 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 0 0.0%

Montgomery 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0.0%

Moore 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 5 83.3%

Randolph 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 3 60.0%

Richmond 8 80.0% 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 10 7 70.0%

Total 26 66.7% 6 15.4% 7 17.9% 39 22 56.4%

Page 17


18/39






Total

Number with

an Initial


Alleghany 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Ashe 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0%

Avery 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7%

Caldwell 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 1 25.0%

Cherokee 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 1 25.0%

Clay 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Graham 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0.0%

Haywood 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 4 0 0.0%

Jackson 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 5 0 0.0%

Macon 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 1 25.0%

McDowell 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 0 0.0%

Swain 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0%

Watauga 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Wilkes 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3 75.0%

Total 24 60.0% 7 17.5% 9 22.5% 40 13 32.5%


New Hanover 23 76.7% 3 10.0% 4 13.3% 30 22 73.3%

Pender 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0%

Total 33 67.3% 6 12.2% 10 20.4% 49 29 59.2%


Robeson 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 6 50.0% 12 2 16.7%

Scotland 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Total 10 30.3% 9 27.3% 14 42.4% 33 4 12.1%

Wake Wake 56 66.7% 13 15.5% 15 17.9% 84 49 58.3%

Western Highlands Network Buncombe 15 55.6% 8 29.6% 4 14.8% 27 8 29.6%

Henderson 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 3 27.3% 11 5 45.5%

Madison 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Mitchell 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Polk 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Rutherford 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0%

Transylvania 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 3 60.0%

Yancey 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0%

Total 28 56.0% 14 28.0% 8 16.0% 50 19 38.0%

Statewide 552 58.0% 177 18.6% 222 23.3% 951 415 43.6%

Urban Counties 412 62.0% 115 17.3% 137 20.6% 664 313 47.1%

Rural Counties 140 48.8% 62 21.6% 85 29.6% 287 102 35.5%




Page 18


19/39



INDICATOR 3: Timely Initiation and Engagement of Individuals in Service (Substance Abuse)




Caswell 4 44.4% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 9 4 44.4%

Total 64 59.3% 6 5.6% 38 35.2% 108 41 38.0%


Greene 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 10 4 40.0%

Nash 45 69.2% 13 20.0% 7 10.8% 65 44 67.7%

Wilson 27 64.3% 3 7.1% 12 28.6% 42 24 57.1%

Total 124 70.9% 26 14.9% 25 14.3% 175 113 64.6%


Forsyth 175 66.3% 21 8.0% 68 25.8% 264 143 54.2%

Rockingham 72 60.0% 13 10.8% 35 29.2% 120 48 40.0%

Stokes 16 59.3% 0 0.0% 11 40.7% 27 13 48.1%

Total 270 63.8% 35 8.3% 118 27.9% 423 207 48.9%


Surry 27 43.5% 9 14.5% 26 41.9% 62 14 22.6%

Yadkin 15 65.2% 4 17.4% 4 17.4% 23 9 39.1%

Total 89 47.8% 31 16.7% 66 35.5% 186 59 31.7%



ECBH Beaufort 22 68.8% 4 12.5% 6 18.8% 32 18 56.3%

Bertie 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 8 4 50.0%Camden 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 2 40.0%

Chowan 5 50.0% 1 10.0% 4 40.0% 10 5 50.0%

Craven 31 41.9% 18 24.3% 25 33.8% 74 26 35.1%

Currituck 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 6 4 66.7%

Dare 15 93.8% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 16 11 68.8%

Gates 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3%

Hertford 20 80.0% 2 8.0% 3 12.0% 25 15 60.0%

Hyde 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Jones 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 4 1 25.0%


Pamlico 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0%

Pasquotank 7 35.0% 5 25.0% 8 40.0% 20 6 30.0%

Perquimans 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 0 0.0%

Pitt 100 68.0% 21 14.3% 26 17.7% 147 79 53.7%

Tyrrell 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Washington 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 2 50.0%

Total 237 62.7% 61 16.1% 80 21.2% 378 189 50.0%

LME

Total

Number with

an Initial

Visit

Page 19


20/39






Total

Number with

an Initial


Lenoir 30 58.8% 9 17.6% 12 23.5% 51 20 39.2%

Sampson 9 50.0% 4 22.2% 5 27.8% 18 8 44.4%

Wayne 26 40.6% 12 18.8% 26 40.6% 64 15 23.4%

Total 71 48.0% 27 18.2% 50 33.8% 148 47 31.8%


Granville 25 56.8% 9 20.5% 10 22.7% 44 22 50.0%

Halifax 26 55.3% 3 6.4% 18 38.3% 47 23 48.9%

Vance 40 62.5% 9 14.1% 15 23.4% 64 33 51.6%

Warren 5 45.5% 1 9.1% 5 45.5% 11 4 36.4%

Total 119 57.8% 25 12.1% 62 30.1% 206 99 48.1%





Catawba 107 65.2% 14 8.5% 43 26.2% 164 84 51.2%

Total 131 61.5% 18 8.5% 64 30.0% 213 100 46.9%


Onslow 14 56.0% 4 16.0% 7 28.0% 25 9 36.0%

Total 46 68.7% 8 11.9% 13 19.4% 67 37 55.2%


Orange 68 82.9% 2 2.4% 12 14.6% 82 50 61.0%

Person 23 67.6% 3 8.8% 8 23.5% 34 16 47.1%

Total 105 73.4% 8 5.6% 30 21.0% 143 74 51.7%


Gaston 111 66.1% 16 9.5% 41 24.4% 168 83 49.4%

Lincoln 24 80.0% 2 6.7% 4 13.3% 30 20 66.7%

Total 179 65.8% 29 10.7% 64 23.5% 272 136 50.0%

PBH Cabarrus 194 89.4% 5 2.3% 18 8.3% 217 116 53.5%

Davidson 157 87.7% 8 4.5% 14 7.8% 179 77 43.0%

Rowan 151 86.3% 5 2.9% 19 10.9% 175 70 40.0%Stanly 53 85.5% 4 6.5% 5 8.1% 62 29 46.8%

Union 97 86.6% 4 3.6% 11 9.8% 112 44 39.3%

Total 652 87.5% 26 3.5% 67 9.0% 745 336 45.1%


Harnett 28 59.6% 7 14.9% 12 25.5% 47 21 44.7%

Hoke 10 76.9% 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 13 5 38.5%

Lee 16 57.1% 5 17.9% 7 25.0% 28 11 39.3%

Montgomery 4 28.6% 4 28.6% 6 42.9% 14 2 14.3%

Moore 40 65.6% 6 9.8% 15 24.6% 61 27 44.3%

Randolph 50 61.7% 10 12.3% 21 25.9% 81 33 40.7%

Richmond 13 52.0% 4 16.0% 8 32.0% 25 11 44.0%Total 169 58.3% 42 14.5% 79 27.2% 290 117 40.3%

Page 20


21/39






Total

Number with

an Initial


Alleghany 5 38.5% 1 7.7% 7 53.8% 13 3 23.1%

Ashe 20 62.5% 5 15.6% 7 21.9% 32 18 56.3%

Avery 13 61.9% 2 9.5% 6 28.6% 21 11 52.4%

Caldwell 36 56.3% 5 7.8% 23 35.9% 64 21 32.8%

Cherokee 15 68.2% 3 13.6% 4 18.2% 22 12 54.5%

Clay 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 2 25.0% 8 3 37.5%

Graham 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 4 1 25.0%

Haywood 48 45.7% 13 12.4% 44 41.9% 105 37 35.2%

Jackson 16 51.6% 0 0.0% 15 48.4% 31 12 38.7%

Macon 15 45.5% 3 9.1% 15 45.5% 33 12 36.4%

McDowell 34 47.2% 20 27.8% 18 25.0% 72 20 27.8%

Swain 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 6 2 33.3%

Watauga 31 58.5% 3 5.7% 19 35.8% 53 20 37.7%

Wilkes 62 68.1% 7 7.7% 22 24.2% 91 45 49.5%

Total 313 54.3% 69 12.0% 194 33.7% 576 227 39.4%


New Hanover 100 39.5% 58 22.9% 95 37.5% 253 75 29.6%

Pender 9 29.0% 7 22.6% 15 48.4% 31 4 12.9%

Total 139 39.5% 80 22.7% 133 37.8% 352 96 27.3%


Robeson 62 68.9% 7 7.8% 21 23.3% 90 46 51.1%

Scotland 16 69.6% 1 4.3% 6 26.1% 23 15 65.2%

Total 110 56.7% 28 14.4% 56 28.9% 194 84 43.3%

Wake Wake 184 65.7% 26 9.3% 70 25.0% 280 149 53.2%


Henderson 37 49.3% 10 13.3% 28 37.3% 75 32 42.7%

Madison 11 55.0% 1 5.0% 8 40.0% 20 7 35.0%

Mitchell 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7 5 71.4%

Polk 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 2 50.0%

Rutherford 32 76.2% 4 9.5% 6 14.3% 42 21 50.0%

Transylvania 10 83.3% 0 0.0% 2 16.7% 12 8 66.7%

Yancey 11 84.6% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 13 8 61.5%

Total 251 71.3% 31 8.8% 70 19.9% 352 191 54.3%

Statewide 4,235 64.6% 675 10.3% 1,649 25.1% 6,559 3,036 46.3%

Urban Counties 2,861 68.0% 363 8.6% 985 23.4% 4,209 2,029 48.2%

Rural Counties 1,374 58.5% 312 13.3% 664 28.3% 2,350 1,007 42.9%




Page 21

NC Di i i f M l H l h D l l Di bili i d S b Ab S i


22/39



INDICATOR 3: Timely Initiation and Engagement of Individuals in Service (Mental Health/Substance Abuse)




Caswell 17 73.9% 3 13.0% 3 13.0% 23 10 43.5%

Total 100 54.3% 42 22.8% 42 22.8% 184 62 33.7%


Greene 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 7 4 57.1%

Nash 54 62.8% 20 23.3% 12 14.0% 86 46 53.5%

Wilson 28 50.9% 17 30.9% 10 18.2% 55 25 45.5%

Total 115 60.2% 48 25.1% 28 14.7% 191 96 50.3%


Forsyth 215 66.8% 46 14.3% 61 18.9% 322 169 52.5%

Rockingham 53 59.6% 17 19.1% 19 21.3% 89 39 43.8%

Stokes 22 62.9% 3 8.6% 10 28.6% 35 15 42.9%

Total 305 65.3% 68 14.6% 94 20.1% 467 235 50.3%


Surry 70 53.4% 33 25.2% 28 21.4% 131 39 29.8%

Yadkin 24 55.8% 11 25.6% 8 18.6% 43 17 39.5%

Total 171 58.6% 65 22.3% 56 19.2% 292 110 37.7%



ECBH Beaufort 38 66.7% 11 19.3% 8 14.0% 57 26 45.6%

Bertie 11 68.8% 2 12.5% 3 18.8% 16 9 56.3%Camden 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 0 0.0%

Chowan 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 5 0 0.0%

Craven 43 37.7% 42 36.8% 29 25.4% 114 32 28.1%

Currituck 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 4 57.1%

Dare 17 53.1% 8 25.0% 7 21.9% 32 14 43.8%

Gates 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3%

Hertford 6 54.5% 4 36.4% 1 9.1% 11 5 45.5%

Hyde 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 1 50.0%

Jones 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 7 4 57.1%


Pamlico 2 12.5% 8 50.0% 6 37.5% 16 1 6.3%

Pasquotank 12 54.5% 2 9.1% 8 36.4% 22 6 27.3%

Perquimans 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 4 44.4% 9 1 11.1%

Pitt 100 54.9% 46 25.3% 36 19.8% 182 68 37.4%

Tyrrell 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7%

Washington 11 73.3% 2 13.3% 2 13.3% 15 11 73.3%

Total 279 51.8% 142 26.3% 118 21.9% 539 202 37.5%

LME

Total

Number with

an Initial

Visit

Page 22

NC Di i i f M t l H lth D l t l Di biliti d S b t Ab S i


23/39






Total

Number with

an Initial


Lenoir 22 42.3% 12 23.1% 18 34.6% 52 15 28.8%

Sampson 18 47.4% 8 21.1% 12 31.6% 38 14 36.8%

Wayne 70 50.4% 40 28.8% 29 20.9% 139 53 38.1%

Total 128 49.0% 67 25.7% 66 25.3% 261 96 36.8%


Granville 11 55.0% 7 35.0% 2 10.0% 20 9 45.0%

Halifax 38 65.5% 15 25.9% 5 8.6% 58 31 53.4%

Vance 21 61.8% 9 26.5% 4 11.8% 34 15 44.1%

Warren 7 58.3% 3 25.0% 2 16.7% 12 6 50.0%

Total 98 64.9% 38 25.2% 15 9.9% 151 79 52.3%





Catawba 82 61.2% 33 24.6% 19 14.2% 134 67 50.0%

Total 115 62.5% 43 23.4% 26 14.1% 184 93 50.5%


Onslow 20 69.0% 7 24.1% 2 6.9% 29 15 51.7%

Total 48 71.6% 14 20.9% 5 7.5% 67 38 56.7%

Orange-Person-Chatham Chatham 24 52.2% 12 26.1% 10 21.7% 46 15 32.6%Orange 79 71.2% 20 18.0% 12 10.8% 111 60 54.1%

Person 32 71.1% 5 11.1% 8 17.8% 45 20 44.4%

Total 135 66.8% 37 18.3% 30 14.9% 202 95 47.0%


Gaston 201 63.6% 46 14.6% 69 21.8% 316 142 44.9%

Lincoln 49 56.3% 18 20.7% 20 23.0% 87 37 42.5%

Total 328 58.8% 104 18.6% 126 22.6% 558 248 44.4%

PBH Cabarrus 19 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19 8 42.1%

Davidson 30 93.8% 0 0.0% 2 6.3% 32 11 34.4%

Rowan 21 87.5% 0 0.0% 3 12.5% 24 3 12.5%Stanly 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 5 50.0%

Union 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7%

Total 83 94.3% 0 0.0% 5 5.7% 88 29 33.0%


Harnett 53 56.4% 21 22.3% 20 21.3% 94 40 42.6%

Hoke 17 73.9% 5 21.7% 1 4.3% 23 12 52.2%

Lee 50 64.1% 10 12.8% 18 23.1% 78 27 34.6%

Montgomery 14 70.0% 4 20.0% 2 10.0% 20 6 30.0%

Moore 49 47.6% 27 26.2% 27 26.2% 103 36 35.0%

Randolph 96 56.8% 32 18.9% 41 24.3% 169 61 36.1%

Richmond 32 62.7% 9 17.6% 10 19.6% 51 24 47.1%Total 323 57.1% 114 20.1% 129 22.8% 566 218 38.5%

Page 23

NC Division of Mental Health Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services


24/39






Total

Number with

an Initial


Alleghany 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0%

Ashe 19 67.9% 4 14.3% 5 17.9% 28 8 28.6%

Avery 9 56.3% 4 25.0% 3 18.8% 16 7 43.8%

Caldwell 50 76.9% 10 15.4% 5 7.7% 65 36 55.4%

Cherokee 17 65.4% 2 7.7% 7 26.9% 26 11 42.3%

Clay 3 37.5% 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 8 2 25.0%

Graham 6 60.0% 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 10 5 50.0%

Haywood 47 42.3% 29 26.1% 35 31.5% 111 34 30.6%

Jackson 16 37.2% 10 23.3% 17 39.5% 43 12 27.9%

Macon 15 46.9% 10 31.3% 7 21.9% 32 11 34.4%McDowell 25 52.1% 15 31.3% 8 16.7% 48 17 35.4%

Swain 12 75.0% 1 6.3% 3 18.8% 16 10 62.5%

Watauga 18 54.5% 10 30.3% 5 15.2% 33 13 39.4%

Wilkes 45 65.2% 12 17.4% 12 17.4% 69 30 43.5%

Total 300 56.4% 114 21.4% 118 22.2% 532 210 39.5%


New Hanover 61 58.7% 27 26.0% 16 15.4% 104 49 47.1%

Pender 11 84.6% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 13 10 76.9%

Total 92 60.5% 37 24.3% 23 15.1% 152 73 48.0%


Robeson 129 71.7% 30 16.7% 21 11.7% 180 108 60.0%

Scotland 22 62.9% 5 14.3% 8 22.9% 35 19 54.3%

Total 188 64.4% 54 18.5% 50 17.1% 292 154 52.7%

Wake Wake 267 59.9% 89 20.0% 90 20.2% 446 198 44.4%


Henderson 48 78.7% 7 11.5% 6 9.8% 61 36 59.0%

Madison 14 70.0% 5 25.0% 1 5.0% 20 10 50.0%

Mitchell 9 60.0% 3 20.0% 3 20.0% 15 8 53.3%

Polk 10 76.9% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 13 7 53.8%

Rutherford 62 73.8% 14 16.7% 8 9.5% 84 43 51.2%

Transylvania 19 76.0% 3 12.0% 3 12.0% 25 10 40.0%

Yancey 10 62.5% 1 6.3% 5 31.3% 16 9 56.3%

Total 357 73.6% 72 14.8% 56 11.5% 485 273 56.3%

Statewide 4,400 60.0% 1,480 20.2% 1,454 19.8% 7,334 3,250 44.3%

Urban Counties 2,734 60.7% 874 19.4% 896 19.9% 4,504 2,036 45.2%

Rural Counties 1,666 58.9% 606 21.4% 558 19.7% 2,830 1,214 42.9%




Page 24

NC Division of Mental Health Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services


25/39



INDICATOR 3: Timely Initiation and Engagement of Individuals in Service (Mental Health/Developmental Disability)




Caswell 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0%

Total 17 68.0% 5 20.0% 3 12.0% 25 11 44.0%


Greene 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3%

Nash 9 50.0% 6 33.3% 3 16.7% 18 7 38.9%

Wilson 4 19.0% 12 57.1% 5 23.8% 21 4 19.0%

Total 25 40.3% 27 43.5% 10 16.1% 62 19 30.6%


Forsyth 22 52.4% 15 35.7% 5 11.9% 42 19 45.2%

Rockingham 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0%Stokes 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Total 27 55.1% 16 32.7% 6 12.2% 49 21 42.9%


Surry 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 10 5 50.0%

Yadkin 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Total 11 50.0% 10 45.5% 1 4.5% 22 10 45.5%



ECBH Beaufort 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 3 1 33.3%

Bertie 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 6 1 16.7%Camden 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3%

Chowan 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0%

Craven 6 35.3% 8 47.1% 3 17.6% 17 5 29.4%

Currituck 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0%

Dare 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 3 100.0%

Gates 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Hertford 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 2 40.0%

Hyde 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Jones 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 0 0.0%

Martin 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 3 75.0%

Northampton 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 2 25.0% 8 3 37.5%

Pamlico 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3%

Pasquotank 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 8 5 62.5%

Perquimans 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Pitt 14 51.9% 7 25.9% 6 22.2% 27 9 33.3%

Tyrrell 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Washington 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3%

Total 49 49.5% 32 32.3% 18 18.2% 99 38 38.4%

LME

Total

Number with

an Initial

Visit

Page 25



26/39

C s o o e ta ea t , e e op e ta sab t es, a d Substa ce buse Se ces





Total

Number with

an Initial


Lenoir 3 25.0% 8 66.7% 1 8.3% 12 3 25.0%

Sampson 2 14.3% 1 7.1% 11 78.6% 14 2 14.3%

Wayne 10 47.6% 10 47.6% 1 4.8% 21 8 38.1%

Total 16 28.1% 22 38.6% 19 33.3% 57 14 24.6%


Granville 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 6 1 16.7%

Halifax 6 35.3% 8 47.1% 3 17.6% 17 5 29.4%

Vance 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 6 3 50.0%

Warren 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 6 3 50.0%

Total 16 40.0% 17 42.5% 7 17.5% 40 13 32.5%





Catawba 4 22.2% 7 38.9% 7 38.9% 18 2 11.1%

Total 13 40.6% 10 31.3% 9 28.1% 32 9 28.1%


Onslow 12 60.0% 7 35.0% 1 5.0% 20 9 45.0%

Total 13 54.2% 9 37.5% 2 8.3% 24 9 37.5%

Orange-Person-Chatham Chatham 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 6 1 16.7%Orange 9 60.0% 3 20.0% 3 20.0% 15 5 33.3%

Person 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3%

Total 12 50.0% 5 20.8% 7 29.2% 24 7 29.2%


Gaston 19 48.7% 17 43.6% 3 7.7% 39 15 38.5%

Lincoln 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6 2 33.3%

Total 37 51.4% 29 40.3% 6 8.3% 72 28 38.9%

PBH Cabarrus 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 6 1 16.7%

Davidson 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0.0%

Rowan 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 8 1 12.5%Stanly 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 3 1 33.3%

Union 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 4 1 25.0%

Total 7 31.8% 3 13.6% 12 54.5% 22 4 18.2%


Harnett 6 37.5% 5 31.3% 5 31.3% 16 4 25.0%

Hoke 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5 83.3%

Lee 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 7 5 71.4%

Montgomery 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Moore 7 58.3% 3 25.0% 2 16.7% 12 4 33.3%

Randolph 13 72.2% 3 16.7% 2 11.1% 18 7 38.9%

Richmond 6 42.9% 4 28.6% 4 28.6% 14 6 42.9%Total 46 59.0% 18 23.1% 14 17.9% 78 33 42.3%

Page 26



27/39

p





Total

Number with

an Initial

Visit

Smoky Mountain Center Alexander 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%

Alleghany 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Ashe 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0.0%

Avery 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 3 100.0%

Caldwell 4 36.4% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% 11 4 36.4%

Cherokee 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3%

Clay 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Graham 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0%

Haywood 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 5 3 60.0%

Jackson 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6 2 33.3%

Macon 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0%McDowell 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 2 50.0%

Swain 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7%

Watauga 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7%

Wilkes 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 0 0.0% 9 2 22.2%

Total 30 58.8% 16 31.4% 5 9.8% 51 24 47.1%


New Hanover 24 68.6% 8 22.9% 3 8.6% 35 19 54.3%

Pender 5 71.4% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 7 4 57.1%

Total 36 66.7% 11 20.4% 7 13.0% 54 25 46.3%


Robeson 19 76.0% 6 24.0% 0 0.0% 25 16 64.0%

Scotland 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3%

Total 27 67.5% 11 27.5% 2 5.0% 40 21 52.5%

Wake Wake 35 51.5% 20 29.4% 13 19.1% 68 30 44.1%


Henderson 6 50.0% 5 41.7% 1 8.3% 12 4 33.3%

Madison 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 6 1 16.7%

Mitchell 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3 75.0%

Polk 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Rutherford 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 8 0 0.0%Transylvania 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0%

Yancey 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 3 100.0%

Total 31 48.4% 24 37.5% 9 14.1% 64 18 28.1%

Statewide 658 51.5% 388 30.4% 232 18.2% 1,278 494 38.7%

Urban Counties 432 51.8% 251 30.1% 151 18.1% 834 328 39.3%

Rural Counties 226 50.9% 137 30.9% 81 18.2% 444 166 37.4%




Page 27


A di f C i S P R Fi Q SFY 2010 2011


28/39


Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Average LOS

(Days)

Alamance-Caswell 8 29% 11 39% 9 32% 0% 28 27.0

Beacon Center 16 36% 20 45% 8 18% 0% 44 29.1

CenterPoint 26 30% 45 52% 16 18% 0% 87 27.0

Crossroads 13 30% 23 53% 6 14% 1 2% 43 38.4

Cumberland 5 19% 11 42% 9 35% 1 4% 26 65.6

Durham Center 20 27% 33 45% 20 27% 0% 73 31.7

ECBH 8 31% 13 50% 5 19% 0% 26 27.0

Eastpointe 18 42% 15 35% 10 23% 0% 43 35.0

Five County 7 32% 12 55% 3 14% 0% 22 19.7Guilford Center 18 31% 26 45% 13 22% 1 2% 58 98.8

Johnston 0% 4 67% 1 17% 1 17% 6 154.8

Mecklenburg 16 26% 30 48% 15 24% 1 2% 62 31.4

Mental Health Partners 8 31% 11 42% 7 27% 0% 26 28.6

Onslow-Carteret 3 60% 2 40% 0% 0% 5 9.4

Orange-Person-Chatham 10 29% 13 37% 12 34% 0% 35 37.2

Pathways 2 33% 2 33% 1 17% 1 17% 6 124.8

PBH 4 11% 17 46% 16 43% 0% 37 42.6

Sandhills Center 29 43% 29 43% 10 15% 0% 68 22.3

Smoky Mountain Center 13 21% 25 40% 24 38% 1 2% 63 43.9

Southeastern Center 19 46% 16 39% 6 15% 0% 41 19.4

Southeastern Regional 5 19% 14 54% 7 27% 0% 26 25.2

Wake 70 42% 65 39% 27 16% 6 4% 168 50.3

Western Highlands Network 16 28% 24 41% 17 29% 1 2% 58 124.7

STATEWIDE 334 32% 461 44% 242 23% 14 1% 1,051 44.9

SOURCE: Healthcare Enterprise Accounts Receivable Tracking System (HEARTS) Data for discharges between July 1 - September 30, 2010 as reported in the Consumer Data Warehouse (CDW) as of 11/2/10

INDICATOR 4: Effective Use of State Psychiatric Hospitals

Total Discharges31 - 365 Days of Care

LME

7 Days of Care or Less 8 - 30 Days of Care Greater than 1 Year

Page 28



29/39


Number Percent Number Percent

Alamance-Caswell 1 5% 3 14% 21

Beacon Center 2 4% 6 11% 55

CenterPoint 8 13% 21 33% 63

Crossroads 3 9% 7 22% 32

Cumberland 0 0% 3 8% 38

Durham Center 10 14% 19 26% 72

ECBH 4 9% 8 19% 43

Eastpointe 8 12% 12 18% 66

Five County 1 4% 2 8% 25

Guilford Center 2 3% 4 7% 60

Johnston 1 6% 2 11% 18

Mecklenburg 1 3% 5 13% 39

Mental Health Partners 1 4% 5 19% 26

Onslow-Carteret 0 0% 1 7% 15

Orange-Person-Chatham 2 7% 4 14% 29

Pathways 1 8% 1 8% 13

PBH 4 9% 7 16% 43

Sandhills Center 6 5% 20 18% 113

Smoky Mountain Center 6 11% 9 16% 57

Southeastern Center 1 2% 4 8% 50

Southeastern Regional 0 0% 3 8% 38Wake 21 10% 47 23% 205

Western Highlands Network 3 7% 10 22% 46

STATEWIDE 86 7% 203 17% 1,167

INDICATOR 5: State Psychiatric Hospital Readmissions

LME

Readmitted within 30 Days of

Discharge

Readmitted within 180 Days of

Discharge Total

Discharges

SOURCE: Healthcare Enterprise Accounts Receivable Tracking System (HEARTS) Data for discharges between January

1, 2010 - March 31, 2010 as reported in the Consumer Data Warehouse (CDW) as of 11/2/10.

Page 29




30/39


Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Alamance-Caswell 6 75% 0% 0% 0% 2 25% 8

Beacon Center 10 29% 3 9% 2 6% 3 9% 17 49% 35CenterPoint 9 64% 0% 1 7% 0% 4 29% 14

Crossroads 5 42% 1 8% 0% 0% 6 50% 12

Cumberland 2 33% 1 17% 0% 0% 3 50% 6

Durham Center 14 78% 3 17% 0% 0% 1 6% 18

ECBH 36 34% 10 10% 4 4% 8 8% 47 45% 105

Eastpointe 11 32% 4 12% 2 6% 0% 17 50% 34

Five County 16 59% 2 7% 0% 2 7% 7 26% 27

Guilford Center 4 40% 0% 1 10% 3 30% 2 20% 10

Johnston 4 80% 0% 1 20% 0% 0% 5

Mecklenburg 18 40% 10 22% 2 4% 4 9% 11 24% 45

Mental Health Partners 10 38% 5 19% 1 4% 0% 10 38% 26

Onslow-Carteret 2 14% 2 14% 1 7% 2 14% 7 50% 14

Orange-Person-Chatham 12 75% 1 6% 0% 0% 3 19% 16

Pathways 17 41% 2 5% 0% 2 5% 20 49% 41

PBH 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2

Sandhills Center 17 77% 0% 0% 0% 5 23% 22

Smoky Mountain Center 37 46% 10 13% 2 3% 5 6% 26 33% 80

Southeastern Center 23 29% 17 21% 3 4% 6 8% 31 39% 80

Southeastern Regional 7 29% 3 13% 1 4% 3 13% 10 42% 24

Wake 7 27% 4 15% 1 4% 1 4% 13 50% 26

Western Highlands Network 43 33% 21 16% 7 5% 8 6% 52 40% 131

STATEWIDE 311 40% 99 13% 29 4% 47 6% 295 38% 781

SOURCE: Healthcare Enterprise Accounts Receivable Tracking System (HEARTS) data for discharges between April 1 - June 30, 2010 in Client Data Warehouse (CDW) as of 11/10/10 matched to Medicaid

and State Service Claims Data for claims paid through October 31, 2010. PBH LME data is self-reported as it is operating under a Medicaid waiver and its data is not included in the paid claims database.

NOTES: The data has been lagged 4 months to allow time for claims to be submitted and the data to be captured by the paid claims system and may not be complete for claims that were submitted and paid later.

The rows may add up to > 100% due to rounding.

Seen in 31 to 60 days

INDICATOR 6: Timely Follow-Up Care for Individuals After Inpatient Care (ADATCs)

Total Number

of DischargesLME

Seen in 1 to 7 days Seen in 8 to 30 days Not SeenSeen in 61+ days

Page 30




31/39

Appendices for Community Systems Progress Report: First Quarter SFY 2010 2011

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Alamance-Caswell 30 73% 3 7% 2 5% 1 2% 5 12% 41

Beacon Center 21 45% 6 13% 1 2% 3 6% 16 34% 47CenterPoint 34 49% 8 11% 4 6% 2 3% 22 31% 70

Crossroads 20 47% 5 12% 6 14% 2 5% 10 23% 43

Cumberland 8 32% 6 24% 1 4% 0% 10 40% 25

Durham Center 40 65% 8 13% 3 5% 0% 11 18% 62

ECBH 16 42% 4 11% 5 13% 2 5% 11 29% 38

Eastpointe 22 41% 9 17% 5 9% 1 2% 17 31% 54

Five County 11 44% 4 16% 1 4% 2 8% 7 28% 25

Guilford Center 40 59% 12 18% 7 10% 3 4% 6 9% 68

Johnston 13 93% 1 7% 0% 0% 0% 14

Mecklenburg 42 66% 12 19% 0% 2 3% 8 13% 64

Mental Health Partners 13 50% 2 8% 2 8% 2 8% 7 27% 26

Onslow-Carteret 4 33% 1 8% 0% 2 17% 5 42% 12

Orange-Person-Chatham 19 73% 3 12% 0% 0% 4 15% 26

Pathways 9 75% 0% 1 8% 1 8% 1 8% 12

PBH 18 67% 2 7% 0% 0% 7 26% 27

Sandhills Center 43 70% 6 10% 0% 4 7% 8 13% 61

Smoky Mountain Center 38 56% 8 12% 4 6% 4 6% 14 21% 68

Southeastern Center 20 38% 6 12% 6 12% 4 8% 16 31% 52

Southeastern Regional 14 38% 8 22% 2 5% 3 8% 10 27% 37

Wake 56 34% 27 16% 15 9% 7 4% 60 36% 165

Western Highlands Network 35 64% 9 16% 4 7% 2 4% 5 9% 55

STATEWIDE 566 52% 150 14% 69 6% 47 4% 260 24% 1,092

SOURCE: Healthcare Enterprise Accounts Receivable Tracking System (HEARTS) data for discharges between April 1 - June 30, 2010 in Client Data Warehouse (CDW) as of 11/10/10 matched to Medicaid

and State Service Claims Data for claims paid through October 31, 2010. PBH LME data is self-reported as it is operating under a Medicaid waiver and its data is not included in the paid claims database.

NOTES: The data has been lagged 4 months to allow time for claims to be submitted and the data to be captured by the paid claims system and may not be complete for claims that were submitted and paid later.

The rows may add up to > 100% due to rounding.

INDICATOR 6: Timely Follow-Up Care for Individuals After Inpatient Care (Psychiatric Hospitals)

Total Number

of DischargesLME

Seen in 1 to 7 days Seen in 31 to 60 days Not SeenSeen in 8 to 30 days Seen in 61+ days

Page 31




32/39

Appendices for Community Systems Progress Report: First Quarter SFY 2010 2011

INDICATOR 7: Child Services in Non-Family Settings (By LME and County)

LMECounty

(Urban/Rural)

Children Receiving

Residential Treatment1

Number Percent

Alamance-Caswell Alamance 23 2.4% 942

Caswell 3 2.6% 114

Total 26 2.5% 1,056

Beacon Center Edgecombe 18 2.7% 660

Greene 3 1.3% 232

Nash 14 2.0% 711

Wilson 13 1.7% 771

Total 48 2.0% 2,374

Centerpoint Davie 7 3.5% 202

Forsyth 50 2.9% 1,739

Rockingham 34 7.2% 473

Stokes 3 1.4% 213

Total 94 3.6% 2,627

Crossroads Iredell 24 2.9% 818

Surry 7 1.8% 394

Yadkin 6 2.8% 218

Total 36 2.5% 1,430

Cumberland Cumberland 16 0.6% 2,561

Durham Center Durham 34 1.4% 2,404

ECBH Beaufort 7 1.8% 382

Bertie 11 6.1% 180

Camden 1 3.0% 33

Chowan 2 1.5% 136

Craven 8 1.1% 745

Currituck 2 2.6% 78

Dare 9 6.7% 135

Gates 1 2.4% 41

Hertford 2 1.6% 125

Hyde 0 0.0% 28

Jones 0 0.0% 101

Martin 5 1.8% 277Northampton 6 2.2% 267

Pamlico 0 0.0% 141

Pasquotank 6 2.3% 258

Perquimans 0 0.0% 66

Pitt 26 1.4% 1,850

Tyrrell 1 5.0% 20

Washington 0 0.0% 233

Total 85 1.7% 5,096

Total Number of Children

Served with MH or SA

Diagnosis2

Page 32




33/39

pp y y g p


LMECounty

(Urban/Rural)

Children Receiving


Number Percent



Diagnosis2

Eastpointe Duplin 4 1.0% 383

Lenoir 2 0.3% 626

Sampson 2 0.5% 426

Wayne 4 0.3% 1,217

Total 12 0.5% 2,652

Five County Franklin 5 1.4% 361

Granville 5 1.7% 299

Halifax 6 1.1% 568

Vance 5 1.0% 478

Warren 2 1.2% 165

Total 22 1.2% 1,871

Guilford Center Guilford 116 4.0% 2,923

Johnston Johnston 23 1.8% 1,279

Mecklenburg Mecklenburg 57 1.0% 5,486

Mental Health Partners Burke 13 1.7% 759

Catawba 32 2.8% 1,126

Total 45 2.4% 1,885

Onslow-Carteret Carteret 4 1.6% 243

Onslow 13 1.4% 900

Total 17 1.5% 1,143

Orange-Person-Chatham Chatham 4 1.3% 307

Orange 9 1.2% 736

Person 2 0.6% 353Total 15 1.1% 1,396

Pathways Cleveland 29 2.5% 1,164

Gaston 23 1.2% 1,942

Lincoln 14 2.7% 520

Total 65 1.8% 3,626

PBH Cabarrus 8 0.6% 1,352

Davidson 8 1.0% 794

Rowan 22 1.7% 1,264

Stanly 1 0.2% 630

Union 11 1.5% 738

Total 50 1.0% 4,778Sandhills Center Anson 1 0.3% 286

Harnett 8 1.2% 641

Hoke 5 1.2% 407

Lee 3 1.0% 292

Montgomery 7 3.2% 222

Moore 6 1.5% 412

Randolph 18 2.0% 909

Richmond 4 0.8% 531

Total 51 1.4% 3,700

Page 33




34/39


LMECounty

(Urban/Rural)

Children Receiving


Number Percent



Diagnosis2

Smoky Mountain Center Alexander 11 5.7% 193

Alleghany 2 2.2% 91

Ashe 2 1.1% 177

Avery 4 4.0% 100

Caldwell 7 1.1% 620

Cherokee 4 1.8% 220

Clay 0 0.0% 77

Graham 0 0.0% 89

Haywood 5 0.7% 730

Jackson 2 0.6% 341

Macon 1 0.4% 234

McDowell 6 2.0% 306

Swain 1 0.8% 122

Watauga 1 0.6% 160

Wilkes 12 2.9% 416

Total 58 1.5% 3,876

Southeastern Center Brunswick 12 1.5% 795

New Hanover 16 1.0% 1,668

Pender 8 1.8% 444

Total 35 1.2% 2,907

Southeastern Regional Bladen 2 0.7% 269

Columbus 8 1.3% 599

Robeson 16 1.0% 1,684

Scotland 3 0.7% 446

Total 29 1.0% 2,998

Wake Wake 75 1.7% 4,530

Western Highlands Network Buncombe 25 1.2% 2,030

Henderson 7 1.1% 622

Madison 5 2.9% 172

Mitchell 1 1.0% 96

Polk 1 0.6% 159

Rutherford 10 2.0% 493

Transylvania 5 3.1% 159

Yancey 3 2.0% 147Total 57 1.5% 3,878

Statewide 1,054 1.6% 66,476

SOURCE: Medicaid and State Service Claims Data, services received and persons served

April - June 2010 paid through October 31, 2010.

1. Residential Treatment = Residential Treatment Level 2 (Program Type), Level 3, and Level 4.

2. The number of children served includes those with co-occurring developmental disabilities.

3. Data for PBH is self-reported.

4. The LME total children receiving residential treatment is an unduplicated count for the LME. If a child

receives residential treatment in more than one county during the quarter, the LME total may not equal

the sum of the individual counties for that LME.

Page 34


Appendices For Community Systems Progress Report

APPENDIX B: Local Management Entities (LMEs), Abbreviations, Member Counties, Population, Medicaid Enrollees,


35/39

g ( ) p

Population Density, and Urban/Rural Designation

LME: Alamance-Caswell (AC)Region: Central

July 2010 Population Estimates July 2010 Medicaid Enrollees Medicaid % of Population Area Persons Urban (200)

Ages 0-17 Ages 18+ Total Ages 0-17 Ages 18+ Total Ages 0-17 Ages 18+ Total Sq Miles Per Sq Mi Rural (


36/39

Region: Eastern




37/39

LME: Onslow-Carteret Behavioral Healthcare Services (OCBHS)Region: Eastern




38/39

Region: Eastern




39/39

Community Systems Progress rpt q1 appendices

Documents