Top Banner
Communicating Science for Policy John Young [email protected]
15

Communicating Science For Policy

Nov 22, 2014

Download

Education

RECOUP

Presentation by John Young, ODI at the RECOUP comms workshop of Sep 09
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Communicating Science For Policy

Communicating Science for PolicyJohn Young [email protected]

Page 2: Communicating Science For Policy

A study for SciDev.NetHow do policymakers access scientific knowledge?

•Systematic literature review: 42 key documents

•Expert interviews: 31 experts

•Country case studies: 7 countries: China, India, Cambodia, Ghana, Zambia, Nicaragua & Bolivia

•Electronic survey: > 600 respondents

Page 3: Communicating Science For Policy

Literature review: 6 tensions1. Politicisation of science vs scientisation

of policy.

2. ‘Citizen’ scientists vs neutral scientists.

3. The demand for certainty vs scientific reality of uncertainty.

4. Divergent motivations and time-frames of scientists and policy-makers.

5. Specialised expertise vs knowledge democracy.

6. Between Western-driven science and indigenous knowledge.

Page 4: Communicating Science For Policy

Country study findings• Limited integration of scientific

knowledge into policy.

• Competing sources of evidence

• Common tensions between researcher and policy maker interests

• Government officials are key players (cf legislators)

• Multinational institutions influential

• Knowledge brokers and translators frequently involved

Page 5: Communicating Science For Policy

Type of Respondents No. %Researchers 288 47%Intermediaries 214 35%Policy Makers 113 18%Sub-national policy makers 41 7%

Regional Representation No. %Sub-Saharan Africa 120 19%South Asia 110 18%Latin America 66 11%MENA 41 7%China and S.E. Asia 21 3%Developing Countries Total 394 64%Global North 224 36%

Type of Organisation No. % Academic institution 202 33%Science-related ministry 107 17%NGO/advocacy group 87 14%Industry 25 4%Multilateral 25 4%Media organisation 24 4%Non-science related ministry 23 4%International scientific panel 8 2%Legislature 7 1%Political advisory 4 0.5%

International survey

Page 6: Communicating Science For Policy

Most were dissatisfied!

Page 7: Communicating Science For Policy

Main obstacles to access

Biggest Obstacle in Developing CountriesParticularly China and SE Asia (70% selected as obstacle)

Second biggest obstacle in dev. countries

esp. China and SE Asia (57%)

All obstacles were cited more often in a developing country context, across regions.

Biggest obstacles

in Developed Countries

(27% and 24% respectively)

Page 8: Communicating Science For Policy

Obstacles to Uptake

Page 9: Communicating Science For Policy

Especially in the South!

Page 10: Communicating Science For Policy

Ministries are different

Page 11: Communicating Science For Policy

What should scientists provide?

Page 12: Communicating Science For Policy

Effective Mediators

Page 13: Communicating Science For Policy

Intermediary organisations…

Page 14: Communicating Science For Policy

Recommendations• Promote role of intermediaries

– Identify actors and stimulate networks

– Represent Scientists or Policy Makers

– Disseminate Information

– Capacity Building

• Rethink how to measure impact – Direct policy change

– Conceptual influence

Page 15: Communicating Science For Policy

Further information

www.odi.org.uk/RAPID/Publications/RAPID_WP_294.html

Or contact Nicola Jones ([email protected])