Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018 Common ECG Issues Faced in Primary Care Tim Prieur
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Common ECG Issues Faced in Primary Care
Tim Prieur
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Faculty Presenter Disclosure
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist
Faculty: Tim Prieur
No Relationships with Financial Sponsors
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Disclosure of Financial Support
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist has received financial support from the following Pharmaceutical companies; Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb/Pfizer, Servier, Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca and Merck in the form of unrestricted educational grants.
Potential Conflicts of Interest: none
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Mitigating Potential Bias
• While we have received unrestricted educational grants from several pharmaceutical companies, most presentations have no mention of specific products and are unrelated to the supporting companies or their products. No specific presentations will be supported or sponsored by a specific company.
• Information on specific products will be presented in the context of an unbiased overview of all products related to treating patients.
• All scientific research related to, reported or used in this CME activity in support or justification of patient care recommendations conforms to the generally accepted standards.
• Clinical medicine is based in evidence that is accepted within the profession.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Objective
• To review ECGs which are commonly encountered in daily clinical practice
• Briefly discuss an approach to their management
• Focus on issues of: rhythm, conduction, markers of associated structural abnormality
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
National Focus to reduced the use of investigations where not clinically indicated
“Choose Wisely”
No national or international practice guidelines on the use of the ECG in clinical practice.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
National focus to reduce the use of investigations where not clinically indicated
• Remember the dictum: “Never order an investigation that you are not sure on how you will use the results”… if you have a low clinical suspicion of an abnormality being present, do you need the investigation?
• The ECG will have the best discriminating value when a medium pre test probability of an abnormality being present exists.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
What is the real “cost” an of ECG?
• Primary
• Secondary:➢Further investigations
➢Consultation
➢Secondary impact on the patient: employment, insurance, personal worry.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Examples and scenario's
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Healthy 40 year old woman
Sinus rhythm, right atrial abnormality, Borderline ECG
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Resulting Investigations
• Chest X ray
• Echocardiogram
• Telephone consult
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Resulting Investigations
• Chest X ray $34.11
• Echocardiogram $250.31
• Telephone consult $85.63
TOTAL $447.40
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
• 50 year old male, low risk factor profile for cardiac health issues
• “Why have I never had one of those heart tracings”
• Would you do one at this point?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
1. I would do an ECG.
2. I would not do an ECG, and explain why.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
His ECG
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
What if he was a: actively smoking, diabetic, borderline hypertensive, with exertional
“breathlessness” and no previous cardiac symptoms, abnormal physical findings or
documented “cardiac events”?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
1. I would do an ECG.
2. I would not do an ECG.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
His ECG
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Poor Discriminatory Value
- Early symptom/ECG positive study for inducible ischemia.
- Multi vessel CAD, including tight right coronary lesion.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
One ECG, two scenarios, entirely different meaning
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Same ECG in a:
- 20 year old female
- 60 year old male
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Scenario's where a precordial ECG may have a discriminatory value.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
78 year old, with “fatigue”
• What is the rhythm?
• Are there any other abnormal findings?
• ? Clinical approach
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Would you:
1. Reassure the patient
2. Arrange cardiology consultation
3. Arrange your own investigations
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
If option 3
1. Echocardiogram
2. Holter monitor
3. Stress test or stress MPI
4. All three
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
What about this 78 year old?
• What is the rhythm?
• Is the clinical importance of the conduction findings any different?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Our last gentleman returns with fatigue for two weeks
• What is the rhythm?
• What are the clinical issues to be dealt with?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Clinical Issues in Atrial Fibrillation
• Is there associated structural heart disease?
• Rate vs. rhythm control with atrial arrhythmias.
• How do we calculate Anticoagulation/bleeding risk.
• Can J Cardiol 2012;28:125
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Is this the same Rhythm?
• Are the management decisions similar/different from the previous patient
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Another example
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
50 year old, chronic breathlessness
• What are the abnormal findings?
• Do they have any “localizing” features?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
23 year old, “asymptomatic”, part of work application
• What is the rhythm?
• Are there any associated abnormal findings?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
35 year old asymptomatic class 1 drivers physical
Is this ECG abnormal and if so, can he qualify at a class 1 level?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Remember CCS fitness to Drive App, found on the CCS website
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
75 year old male, recurrent pre syncope
• What is the abnormality?
• Does it have any predictive value?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Typical episode captured
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
80 year old, intermittent atrial flutter, now recurrent near syncope and syncope
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
80 year old, atrial flutter, hard to know what rate control agent in place
• What are the possible mechanisms of syncope?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Possible mechanisms
• Transient marked AV block when either in sinus rhythm, an abnormal atrial rhythm
• Sinus node dysfunction- primary when in sinus, or on termination of atrial arrhythmia.
• A previously unrecognized arrhythmia.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
A second similar mechanism
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
50 year old, asymptomatic
• “Possible previous antero septal Myocardial Infarction”
• !?#*, now what?
• Are the findings “diagnostic?”
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
What about this one? Can this be explained by lead placement?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Another example the computer might give the same diagnosis of previous anterior MI.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
55 year old, asymptomatic
• Is there evidence of previous infarction? Now what.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
This one is diagnostic
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
24 hour holter, 50 year old, “palpitations”
• Now what?
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
Ask and stratify “ what is the likelihood of associated structural heart health issues?
• Is there otherwise a clinical suspicion of a significant cardiac heal issue?
• Additional screening investigations
- Echocardiogram
- Screen for ischemic heart disease.
Cardiology for the Non-Cardiologist 2018
In summary
• Is an ECG clinically indicated? If not, why should I order one.
• What is the pre test likelihood of a disorder causing an abnormality being present?
• Do I have a game plan in place if an abnormality is identified?