Common Core State Standards November 26, 2012 1
Dec 29, 2015
Essential Questions
1. What is the correlation between RGSD’s Mission/Vision and the CCSS?
2. How will the CCSS affect instructional practices?
3. How will the CCSS impact students’ academic performance preparing them to be college and career ready?
•The Common Core State Standards, also called the Core Academic Standards in Missouri, define what students should know and be able to do at every grade level in grades K-12.
•The standards are more rigorous than the previous standards. The focus of the standards closes the gap between high school and college/ career readiness. In addition, the standards will require less rote memorization and more concepts applicable to real-world problem solving.
Common Core Defined:
3
We know that . . .
CCSS is a charge by states to ensure that all students are college and career ready by graduation.
Standards are set requirements for ELA and Literacy in Social Studies/History, Science, Math and Tech subjects
Standards lay out a vision of what it means to be a literate person in the twenty-first century.
4
Grade Level and End Of Course Tests• 2012-13: Normal testing, return of Performance Events
and Writing Prompts in all content areas
• 2013-14: Normal testing, except for movement of CA and Math assessments to align to CCSS (without changing test design and blueprint)
• 2014-15: Implement SMARTER Balance Assessments in ELA, math
• 2014-15: All assessments will be online
• **More End Of Course Test will be required • **Comprehensive (End Of High School) Assessments
required for 2016 Graduates -
Assessments Transitions
5
6
Overview of Reading Strand
Reading
Progressive development of reading comprehension; students gain more from what they read
Emphasize the importance of grade-level texts that are of appropriate difficulty and are increasingly sophisticated Standards for Reading Foundational Skills (K-5)
Reading Standards for Literature (K-12)
Reading Standards for Informational Text (K-12)
Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies (6-12)
Reading Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects (6-12)
7
Overview of Writing Strand
Writing Expect students to compose arguments and opinions,
informative/explanatory pieces, and narrative texts
Focus on the use of reason and evidence to substantiate an argument or claim
Emphasize ability to conduct research – short projects and sustained inquiry
Require students to incorporate technology as they create, refine, and collaborate on writing
Include student writing samples that illustrate the criteria required to meet the standards (See standards’ appendix for writing samples)
8
Overview of Speaking and Listening and Language Strands
Speaking and Listening Focus on speaking and listening in a range of settings, both formal and
informal – academic, small-group, whole-class discussions
Emphasize effective communication practices
Require interpretation and analysis of message as presented through oral, visual, or multimodal formats
Language Include conventions for writing and speaking
Highlight the importance of vocabulary acquisition through a mix of conversation, direct instruction, and reading
To be addressed in context of reading, writing, speaking and listening
Media and Technology are integrated throughout the standards.
Students who are College and Career Ready (CCR) …
Demonstrate independenceConstruct viable arguments and
critique the evidence of othersParticipate in a range of
effective conversationsCollaborate with diverse
partnersUse technology and digital
evidence strategically and capably
Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them
10
College and Career Readiness Anchor Standard 10 for Reading
Read and comprehend complex
literary and informational texts independently and
proficiently.11
Text Complexity Model
Text complexity is defined by:
Qua
litat
ive2. Qualitative measures – levels of meaning,
structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands often best measured by an attentive human reader.
Quantitative
1. Quantitative measures – readability and other scores of text complexity often best measured by computer software.
Reader and Task
3. Reader and Task considerations – background knowledge of reader, motivation, interests, and complexity generated by tasks assigned often best made by educators employing their professional judgment.
12
13
ScientistScientist
TeacherTeacherExecutiveExecutive
NurseNurseSupervisorSupervisor
SalesSales
SecretarySecretary
ForemanForeman
ClerkClerk
CraftmanCraftman
ConstructionConstructionClerkClerk
LaborLabor
Lexile ScoreLexile ScoreLexile ScoreLexile Score
150015001300130011001100900900700700
On-the Job Lexile RequirementsOn-the Job Lexile RequirementsNational Adult Literacy Study
How is knowing a text’s complexity level assist us in
improving our students’ reading engagement and
comprehension?
A Question to Remember . . .
15
Text Complexity & Engagement: Assessments
Reading Interest Inventory
Engagement Inventory
Adequate Range of Reading Rates
Book Logs
16
Assessing and Measuring Reading Engagement
Qualitative Quantitative
Engagement Inventory-Are the child’s eyes on the print?-Is the child giggling at the funny parts?-Is the child turning pages at an acceptable pace?-What types of things distract a child from reading?Book Logs-What types of books (genres, authors, levels) does the child tend to choose?Reading Inventory-What are a child’s attitudes toward reading?-Whom does a child like to share his reading with?What types of books (genres, authors) does the child report liking & disliking?
Engagement Inventory-How many minutes can a child stay engaged with a book?Book Log-How many pages is the child reading per minute?-How many books does the child read per week?-How much time is spent reading at home versus reading at school?
17
Reading Interest Inventory Administered at the beginning of the year and
repeated periodically throughout the year Make sure the students answer honestly without
penalty Constructed response inventories will give you a
deeper understanding of each student Results of inventory will allow teacher to:
Pull small groups to guide students (book tastes, reading habits, student attitudes, who each student is a reader, etc.)
Form groups/partners/book clubs Modify unit plans for the year (including read aloud
choices) Reorganize classroom library
Handout
18
Engagement Inventory Results of the engagement inventory will
allow teacher to: Clearly target the length of time that students stay
engaged during independent reading time Determine distracters Form groups/partners/book clubs Develop intervention plans
Small groups Individual conferences
Handouts
19
Book Logs
Results of the book log will allow teacher to: Determine reading rate Analyze the types of books the student is reading
at home and school Look at stamina tied to genre Determine indications for difficulty with word
study and fluency Pull small groups and confer about: book choice,
stamina and reading rate
Handout
20
Book Logs
Completed weekly by the student Learn about student’s habits and stamina Types of book a student chooses—is there a
good variety or is it time to broaden the student’s reading tastes?
Time spent reading at home Time spent reading at school Page per minute rate (Reading Rate Handout)
21
Resources
Teaching Reading in Small Groups by Jennifer Serravallo
When Kids Can’t Read, What Teachers Can Do by Kylene Beers
Pathways to the Common Core: Accelerating Achievement by Lucy Calkins, Mary Ehrenworth and Christopher Lehman
Professional Development - State Workshops , CSD Workshops and Regional Consortiums (Language Arts Regional Consortiums)
DESE Common Core Information Page Crosswalk FAQs PowerPoints and Videos
CCSS Websites and Curriculum Maps Websites CCSS Appendices:
A – Defines Terms B – Suggested Text and Student Tasks Samples C – Writing Exemplars
Various State Websites ----KS, MA, DE District Website – The Standards, Appendices, FAQs and Parent
Resource
Resources and Supports
24