Top Banner
Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi
24

Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Lenard Lane
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Committee of Practitioners Title III

March 30, 2012Robert CrawfordMami Itamochi

Page 2: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Agenda

• TransAct Usage Data & Renewal • Title III Consortium Model • Title III Program Checklist

Page 3: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 4: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

TransACT Background

• Parent Notification of ESEA Title I, Section 1118(f) and Title III, Part C, Section 3302

• 2010 WVDE Subscription- TransACT GenEd Parent Notifications- TransACT NCLB Parent Notifications - TransACT State Masters Special Programs

• Legally Reviewed

Page 5: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 6: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 7: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 8: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 9: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 10: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 11: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 12: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 13: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.
Page 14: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Audience Participation

• How are you currently using TransACT to support the work of Federal Programs?

• How might your county utilize TransAct in the future?

• What might be some effective ways to increase statewide usage?

Page 15: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Consortia

SEC. 3114. Within-State Allocation(b) LIMITATION. – A State educational agency shall not award a subgrant from an allocation made under subsection (a) if the amount of such subgrant would be less than $10,000.

Page 16: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Consortia – Current Structure• The current consortia model utilizes a

RESA approach to allocating subgrants. Essentially the RESA is a fiscal agency to transfer funds to LEA’s. – No accountability is established at the RESA

level for monitoring or strategic planning.• The alignment of LEA’s in the current

consortia model does not correspond directly with the established WV geographical grouping of district in RESA’s. – Currently RESA 4 and RESA 6 are functioning

as a fiscal agency

Page 18: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Boone 4 $ 305.00 $ 1,220.00 4

Braxton 0 $ 305.00 $ - 4

Fayette 6 $ 305.00 $ 1,830.00 4

Greenbrier 32 $ 305.00 $ 9,760.00 4

Lincoln 2 $ 305.00 $ 610.00 4

Logan 6 $ 305.00 $ 1,830.00 4

Mason 12 $ 305.00 $ 3,660.00 4

Mercer 17 $ 305.00 $ 5,185.00 4

Mingo 2 $ 305.00 $ 610.00 4

Nicholas 7 $ 305.00 $ 2,135.00 4

Pocahontas 0 $ 305.00 $ - 4

Wayne 24 $ 305.00 $ 7,320.00 4

Webster 1 $ 305.00 $ 305.00 4

Wyoming 1 $ 305.00 $ 305.00 4

Page 19: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Proposal for Restructure

• Subgrant allocation is allotted to a regional educational center that services multiple LEA’s (RESA). – Fiscal agent for the grant and issues

subgrants to the individual LEA’s that do not meet the $10,000 minimum.

– RESA retains a portion of federal allocation from each LEA

• Meaningful professional development• Additional technical assistance

Page 20: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Audience Participation

• What do you see as the positives of the restructured model?

• What challenges might exist?

• What suggestions do you have regarding the proposal?

Page 21: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Risk Factor

• Technical Assistance Tool• Self-monitoring• Other States

– Illinois – Oregon – North Carolina

Page 22: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Risk Factor Sheet

CountyDoes your county hire (contract) ESL certified teacher for your ESL students?

Does your county send any teachers to ESL MU Cohort?

Did you submit Monitoring Response by due date?

Barbour

Berkeley

Boone

Braxton

Brooke

Page 23: Committee of Practitioners Title III March 30, 2012 Robert Crawford Mami Itamochi.

Audience Participation

• What do you see as the benefit of this self-assessment checklist and how might it be used?

• What challenges might this document create?

• What additional questions or factors should be considered or addressed in this document or the process?