Commercializing environmental innovative products Environmental alternative Energy technology Reduced energy consumption technology (Tribology) What does.

• Commercializing environmental innovative products

• Environmental alternative Energy technology

• Reduced energy consumption technology (Tribology)

What does ENVIRO₂ do in general?

ENVIRO₂PRO:

• Our product “ENVIRO₂PRO” offers a unique combination of features through Nano-particle technology in the field of tribology.

• With ENVIRO₂PRO we are dedicated to provide our clients operational cost savings and environmental advantages when used in combustion engines.

ENVIRO₂PRO is manufactured in Ulm, in the South of Germany

The application of ENVIRO₂PRO will initiate the following process:

• A thorough internal cleaning of the engine, particularly where the frictional surfaces are concerned.

• Modification of the frictional surfaces. The surface tension and wear will reduce.

• Reduction of the engines internal mechanical losses.

The following measurable effects will occur:

• A significant reduction in fuel consumption.• A decrease in engine oil consumption. • A significant decrease in engine emissions. • An increase in performance and dynamics

of the engine.• Optimized compression• Mechanical noise reduction• Extension of the engine’s life span.

In general ENVIRO₂PRO will ensure:

• Economic as well as ecological efficiency by fuel- and engine oil savings.

• Cost savings on maintenance intervals

Brief technology explanation:

Tribology is the science and engineering of interacting surfaces in relative motion. It includes the study and application of the principles of friction, lubrication and wear.

Tribology:

The build-up of nano-tribological, elastic and flexible structures on frictional surfaces cause an effective protection against wear in combination with a consistent long-term operational cost reduction.

Technical conclusion:

Example references:

Industrial Truck Solution

Nautical

Agricultural

Industrial Truck Solution

ENVIRO₂PRO

Industrial Truck Solution

Truck-Type: MAN 1843Engine Type: 2876 LF 04Displacement: 12.816 ccmManufact. Date: 10.07.2002Power rating: 338 kWEmission Class: Euro 3Milage: 891.156

Reference example:

Applied quantities ENVIRO₂PRO concentrate:

• Engine; 90 ml

• Gearbox; 40 ml

• Differential; 35 ml

Before Application

Date: driven km Load in To. Ltr. of Diesel Fuel consumption To. X km Ltr. : To x kmin Ltr. /100km

26.02.2011 1.219 15,9 390 32 19,41 0,020128.02.2011 1.360 17,4 430 31,6 23,69 0,018103.03.2011 1.425 18,5 490 34,4 26,38 0,018604.03.2011 1.247 16,5 390 31,3 20,55 0,01906.03.2011 1.304 16,9 450 34,5 21,98 0,020510.03.2011 1.274 17,1 380 29,8 21,77 0,017512.03.2011 1.275 19,1 410 32,2 24,42 0,016814.03.2011 1.281 12,1 390 30,5 15,53 0,025118.03.2011 1.199 10 430 35,9 12,06 0,0357

11.584 143,5 3.760 32,47 185,78 0,0202

After Application

Date: driven km Load in To. Ltr. of Diesel Fuel consumption To. X km Ltr. : To x kmin Ltr. /100km

20.03.2011 1.929 21,5 590 30,6 41,42 0,014226.03.2011 1.282 23,2 430 33,6 29,69 0,014528.03.2011 1.789 20,9 570 31,9 37,55 0,015201.04.2011 1.183 10,6 390 33,0 12,52 0,031103.04.2011 1.415 34,6 490 34,6 48,96 0,010007.04.2011 1.299 20,7 390 30,0 26,89 0,014509.04.2011 1.284 17,6 420 32,7 22,57 0,018611.04.2011 1.350 24,8 410 30,4 33,53 0,012215.04.2011 1.353 26,9 480 35,5 36,46 0,0132

12.884 200,8 4.170 32,37 289,61 0,0144

Financial aspects for this example:

Conclusion:

The monthly consumption before and after the application were compared, in average fuel consumption in Ltr. per Tonne per driven km. Here we already see (in this example) a fuel cons. reduction of 29%

In before and after the application we saw the same fuel consumption over a similar distance, however after the usage of ENVIRO₂PRO the carried load was 40% higher. This all with a fuel consumption of 3.08km/Ltr.

Calculation example:

• Fleet size: 1.000 Trucks• Average Mileage per year: 100.000km• Total distance covered: 1.000x100.000 =

100.000.000 km• Fuel consumption per truck: 2 km/Ltr. • Total fuel cons. : 100.000.000 / 2 = 50.000.000

Ltr. p/a• Price per Ltr. fuel: 1 U$• Actual total fuel costs: U$ 50 Million per year• Average fuel consumption reduction: 15%• Total savings per year: U$ 7.5 Million on fuel. • Total investment for 1.000 trucks: appr. U$

1.000.000

However!!

ENVIRO₂PRO lasts on average 300.000kmor, in this case, 3 years.Meaning a fuel cost saving of 3 x U$ 7.500.000 = U$ 22.500.000 ! Net Saving per 3 years: 22.5 M – 1 M = $ 21.5 Million!!

Means a saving of U$ 22.900 per day for the whole fleet!!

This is apart from the other already mentioned benefits (difficult to estimate) like:

• less maintenance; • extended life- span; • reduced oil consumption;• improved engine dynamics and performance!

Nautical

MS Lehmann of KW Bereederungs GmbH & Co KGGermany

Main Engine (1) 1 Main EngineType of the Engine Pielstick (SEMT) 6 CylinderYear of construction 2007Service performance in hrs. App. 3,300 Hrs.Displacement 400.000ccmMax. Rpm: 520 rpmOil capacity (L) 5,000 L 5.000 LtrType of the used engine oil Oil Type AGINA T 40Fresh oil supply per day 80-100 LMachine care intervals of oil separators Every other dayMachine care intervals of fuel separators Every other dayAverage Fuel consumption per day and hrs. 14 mt/24 hrs a day

Data – Auxiliary engine

No. Auxiliary Engine 3 Auxiliary EnginesType of the Engine Dong Yang ChinaYear of construction 2007Rpm 1,500 rpmEngine Oil capacity (L) 40 LType of engine oil 15W40Oil change intervals Every 250 hrs an oil changeAverage Fuel consumption per day and hrs. 1.5 mt/24 hrs a day

Results:

(A “only read” copy of the actual test is available during this presentation. )

Economical Evaluation:

Main engine Oil consumption average reduction by 10 % 3,500.00 €

Auxiliary engine (3) Oil consumption average reduction by 66 % 2,200.00 €

Main engine (1): Fuel: Heavy Fuel consumption average reduction by 18 %

200,000.00 €

Auxiliary engines (3) Fuel: Diesel consumption average reduction by 20 %

78,000 €

Total savings average (over an operating period of 15 months) 283,700.00 €

(A “only read” copy of the actual test is available during this presentation. )

The average fuel consumption has been reduces by 3 mt/daily or 23 %. Bearing in mind the different fuel qualities there will be a fuel quality tolerance of 5 %. Which will then result in a saving of 18 %.

By an average costs for tons of heavy fuel of 350.00 € it will be savings of app. 200,000.00 Euro a year.

“By using the ENVIRO₂PRO technologies there were high costsavings. E.g. decrease of lubricants consumption by 10 %, reduce of fuel consumption by 18 % at the main engines and by 20 % at the auxiliary engines.”

Statement of Captain Olaf Wulff, Managing Director of KW Bereederungs GmbH & Co KG:

“Due to this reason and the projects in the past we have madethese conclusions and took the decision to use ENVIRO₂PRO for all our crafts of my shipping company.”

(A “only read” copy of the actual test is available during this presentation. )

Agricultural

ZETOR 12441 / P103

The use of this Nano-technology on the engine test stand showed that the performance parameters improved substantially .

+ an increase of the engine performance against the manufacturers data. + a reduction of the fuel consumption.

This results in an immidiate economical advantage for the user.

• The engine output increased with 2,2 kW

• At 1.240 rpm the torque value increased from 247 Nm to 530 Nm. (!)

• The fuel consumption reduced by 13,8%

If we relate the fuel consumption with the engine output, we see that the untreated engine reaches it‘s max. power output at 2.000 rpm.

After treatment the max. power output was reachedat 1.550 rpm. but with a 13,8% lower fuel consumption.

(A “only read” copy of the actual test is available during this presentation. )

More typical applications:

ENVIRO₂ and the near future:

We are determined to tapp into new markets.

E.g.:

There is a large potential for ENVIRO₂ in the global windmill industry.

The windmill gearboxes are a potential danger…..

A Quote from the magazine:

“Renewable Energy World”

Issue: 3 June 2010

Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability:

“Recently, Sandy Butterfield, a former chief wind turbine engineer at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Colorado, was quoted as stating that the wind industry expects today's gearboxes to last 7–11 years. This markedly contrasts with the 20-year design lifetime of the wind turbines. And the implications for the industry are huge, since changing a gearbox is typically a lengthy and extremely costly exercise.”

These pictures speak for themselves…

ENVIRO₂ is convinced that we offer a solution for this growing problem.

The unique capabilities of ENVIRO₂PRO will assist wind-park operators to substantially lower their risk and consequentially lower their operational costs.

Thank you for your attention!

ENVIRO₂ GmbHNicolaus-Otto-Strasse 1089079 Ulm, Germany

+49 731 7051520 +49 151 67200862 +49 160 97228855

[email protected] www.enviro2.com