Comments on "Foreign Aid Effectiveness And Selectivity: New Results" The Massachusetts Avenue Development Seminar (MADS) Center for Global Development Washington, DC April 13, 2004 Nicholas Eberstadt Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy American Enterprise Institute <[email protected]>
28
Embed
Comments on "Foreign Aid Effectiveness And Selectivity: New Results"
Comments on "Foreign Aid Effectiveness And Selectivity: New Results". The Massachusetts Avenue Development Seminar (MADS) Center for Global Development Washington, DC April 13, 2004 Nicholas Eberstadt Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy American Enterprise Institute . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Comments on "Foreign Aid Effectiveness
And Selectivity: New Results"
The Massachusetts Avenue Development Seminar (MADS)Center for Global Development
Washington, DCApril 13, 2004
Nicholas EberstadtHenry Wendt Chair in Political Economy
There are indeed indications that the relationship between aid absorption
and local policy climate in low-income areas has been changing
somewhat over time—although not necessarily in the expected
directions…
Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003 CD-ROMGwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
ODA as Percent GNI vs. Economic Freedom Rating, 1985
y = -1.0891x + 11.314 (-1.49) (3.01)
R2 = 0.0426n = 50
0
10
20
30
40
0 5 10
Economic Freedom Rating
OD
A a
s P
erce
nt
GN
I
1985
Linear(1985)
Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003 CD-ROM
Gwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
ODA as Percent GNI vs. Economic Freedom Rating, 2001
y = -3.0479x + 24.24 (-2.52) (3.32)
R2 = 0.1076n = 55
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 5 10
Economic Freedom Rating
OD
A a
s P
erce
nt
GN
I 2001
Linear(2001)
Beyond Policy Climate:
Other Possible Criteria and Attendant Indicators For
Measuring Aid Effectiveness • Economic Performance [per capita output, per
capita exports]• Living Standards [per capita output, life
reliable data (cf. international poverty lines, etc.)
Disaggregating Performance By Region, 1984-2002
• “Low and Middle Income Countries”: World Bank Designation for All Developing Regions
• East Asia
• South Asia
• Latin America and the Caribbean
• Middle East
• Sub-Saharan Africa
• Also, two “special cases” of highly “political” aid: Israel and the Russian Federation
Note: Constant 1995 US DollarsSource: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003 CD-ROM
GDP Per Capita, 1984-2002Relatively Successful Economies
100
1000
10000
100000
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Year
GD
P Pe
r Cap
ita
East Asia &Pacific
Israel
Latin America &Caribbean
Low & middleincome
South Asia
GDP Per Capita, 1984-2002 Less Successful Economies
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Year
GD
P P
er C
apit
a
Middle East
Russia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Note: Constant 1995 US DollarsSource: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003 CD-ROM
Note: Series adjusted to 2002 US Dollars by PPI deflatorSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002
(Paris :OECD, 2004); idem., International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
Net ODA, 2002 DollarsRelatively Successful Economies
100
1000
10000
100000
Year
Net
OD
A
East Asia
Israel
LatinAmerica/Caribbean
Low Middle Income
South Asia
Net ODA, 2002 DollarsLess Successful Economies
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Year
Net
OD
A
Middle East
Russia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Note: Series adjusted to 2002 US Dollars by PPI deflatorSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002
(Paris :OECD, 2004); idem., International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
Exports per Capita, 1984-2001
Source: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Exports Per Capita, 2002 DollarsRelatively Successful Economies
10
100
1000
10000
Year
Exp
ort
s P
er C
apita
East Asia & Pacif ic
Low & middle income
South Asia
Latin America &Caribbean
Israel
Exports Per Capita, 2002 DollarsLess Successful Economies
0100200300400500600700800900
Year
Exp
ort
s P
er C
apita
Middle East
Russia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004) The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
ODA as a Percentage of Exports,Relatively Successful Economies
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Year
Perc
enta
ge o
f Exp
orts
East Asia
Israel
Latin America& CaribLow MiddleIncomeSouth Asia
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
ODA as a Percentage of ExportsLess Successful Economies
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Year
Per
cen
tag
e o
f Exp
ort
s
Middle East
Russia
Sub-SaharanAfrica
Source: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
ODA as Percentage of ImportsRelatively Successful Economies
0
5
10
15
20
Year
Per
cent
age
of Im
port
s
East Asia &P acific
Israel
Latin America &Caribbean
Low & middleincome
South Asia
ODA as a Percentage of ImportsLess Successful Economies
0
5
10
15
20
25
Year
Per
cen
tag
e o
f Im
po
rts
Middle East
Russia
Sub-SaharanAfrica
Source: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
FDI as Percentage of ODA, 1984-2001
FDI as a Percentage of ODARelatively Successful Economies
0%
500%
1000%
1500%
2000%
Year
Per
cen
tag
e o
f OD
A
East Asia &Pacific
Israel
Latin America &Carib
Low MiddleIncome
South Asia
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
FDI as a Percentage of ODALess Successful Economies
-20%
80%
180%
280%
380%
Year
Perc
enta
ge o
f OD
A
Middle East
Russia
Sub-Saharan Africa
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Performance Indicators for Developing World and by Region
1984 versus 2002
(regions listed in descending order of overall performance)
Low/Middle Income Countriesc. 1984 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 972 1279
Life Expectancy at Birth 62 65
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 185 352
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 1.0% 0.9%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 5.6% 1.7%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 4.5% 2.9%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 47% 279%
Average Economic Freedom Rating 4.6 6.1
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 1.2 trillionSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)
OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Gwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
East Asia & Pacificc. 1984 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 367 1048
Life Expectancy at Birth 66 69
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 81 332
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 0.7% 0.5%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 3.3% 1.1%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 3.7% 1.2%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 99% 751%
Average Economic Freedom Rating 6.1 6.8
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 141 billion
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROMGwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
South Asiac. 1984 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 270 486
Life Expectancy at Birth 56 63
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 28 66
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 1.5% 1.0%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 21.9% 9.4%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 13.1% 5.1%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 2% 47%
Average Economic Freedom Rating 4.6 5.8
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 139 billionSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)
OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Gwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
Israel c. 1992 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 14,259 17,068
Life Expectancy at Birth 76 79
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 4383 6611
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 3.2% 0.8%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 10.6% 1.9%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 7.5% 0.3%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 29% 428%
Economic Freedom Rating 4.2 6.5
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 29 billionSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)
OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Gwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
Latin America & the Caribbeanc. 1984 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 3391 4052
Life Expectancy at Birth 66 71
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 423 771
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 0.5% 0.3%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 2.1% 1.3%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 2.1% 1.2%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 162% 1356%
Average Economic Freedom Rating 4.3 6.4
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 101 billionSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)
OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Gwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
Middle Eastc. 1984 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 1843 1988
Life Expectancy at Birth 62 69
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 728 672
ODA as a Percentage of GNI N/A 0.7%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 3.3% 1.7%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 3.0% 2.7%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 172% 164%
Average Economic Freedom Rating 5.2 6.3
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 74 billion
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROMGwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
Russiac. 1992 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 2967 2609
Life Expectancy at Birth 67 66
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 570 776
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 0.5% 0.4%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 6.2% 1.2%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 2.6% 1.3%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 15% 190%
Economic Freedom Rating 4.1 5.0
Total ODA 1992-2002 (2002 $) 50 billionSources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)
OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROM
Gwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
Sub-Saharan Africac. 1984 c. 2002
GDP Per Capita (1995 $) 621 575
Life Expectancy at Birth 49 46
Per Capita Exports (2002 $) 188 168
ODA as a Percentage of GNI 4.9% 4.6%
ODA as a Percentage of Exports 12.9% 16.4%
ODA as a Percentage of Imports 12.2% 11.0%
FDI as a Percentage of ODA 13% 74%
Average Economic Freedom Rating 4.5 5.7
Total ODA 1984-2002 (2002 $) 319 billion
Sources: OECD, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows of Aid to Recipients 1988-2002 (Paris: OECD, 2004)OECD, International Development Statistics, 2002. CD-ROM
The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2003. CD-ROMGwartney, James and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual ReportThe Fraser Institute, 2003.
Preliminary Conclusions
• Did the policy climate in recipient low-income areas improve between 1984 and 2002? Very clearly, yes—improvement was marked and general.
• Did aid “selectivity” and aid “effectiveness” contribute positively to this outcome? The answer to this question is not at all self-evident.
• For low-income, aid-receiving areas as a whole, trends were generally positive for economic performance (up), living standards (up), and structural aid dependence (down).
• But performance “story lines” varied tremendously between regions—with the most heavily aid-dependent areas characterized by measured stagnation, or retrogression, in economic performance and living standards.
• How to explain the striking negative association among regions between high aid levels and poor trends in economic performance and living standards: Measurement error? “Neighborhood effects”? Independent influence of structural aid dependence? Some combination? Other factors?
• Perhaps surprisingly, markedly different performance records for highly “political” aid in different settings: the “story line” for Russia looks rather disappointing, while the “story line” appears more promising.