20-06-2009 26th ICC 1 Collateral effects of antibiotics Collateral effects of antibiotics : : adverse effects and drug interactions adverse effects and drug interactions Françoise Van Bambeke & Paul M. Tulkens Unité de Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire, Centre de Pharmacie clinique, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain. <www.facm.ucl.ac.be> Meet the experts – session 41 – June 20th, 2009
52
Embed
Collateral effects of antibiotics: adverse effects and drug … · 2009. 6. 24. · 20-06-2009 26th ICC 1 Collateral effects of antibiotics Collateral effects of antibiotics: : adverse
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
20-06-2009 26th ICC 1
Collateral effects of antibioticsCollateral effects of antibiotics :: adverse effects and drug interactionsadverse effects and drug interactions
Françoise Van Bambeke &
Paul M. Tulkens Unité
de Pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire,
Centre de Pharmacie
clinique, Louvain Drug Research Institute,
Université
catholique de Louvain.
<www.facm.ucl.ac.be>
Meet the experts – session 41 – June 20th, 2009
20-06-2009 26th ICC 2
Back to Back to schoolschool ::
a a littlelittle bit of bit of theorytheory
20-06-2009 26th ICC 3
What are we speaking about ?
•
Adverse event
: harm in a patient administered a drug, but not necessarily caused by the drug
•
Adverse drug reaction
(abbreviated ADR) : harm directly caused by a drug at normal doses
harm has occured
harm may have occured
•
Side effect:a usually predictable or dose-dependent effect of a drug that is not the principal effect for which the drug was chosenthe side effect may be desirable, undesirable, or inconsequential
Nebeker et al., Ann Intern Med. (2004) 140:795-801
20-06-2009 26th ICC 4
ADR within collateral effects
medication errors
costs
ADRflora
20-06-2009 26th ICC 5
How to detect ADR ?
type characteristics interest
clinical trials 5000-10,000 patientscomparison with other drugsused in same indicationsno detection of very rare effects
post-marketing studies
larger number of patientsless controlledpossible detection of rare effects
spontaneous reports to pharmacovigilance systems
no estimation of incidence possiblelargely dependent on GP attention and on number of prescriptions
case - non case studies
estimation of risk for rare ADR
case reports often only source for very rare ADR sensitivity
quantification
20-06-2009 26th ICC 6
• clinical or microbiological• emergence of resistance
• often rare but serious•
not detected before large-scale usage
• PK issues (tissue accumulation)•
lack of specificity for procaryotic target
How to categorize ADR ?
•
Type
:
Rehan et al., Eur. J. Int. Med. (2009) 20: 3–8
type definition
Aaugmented pharmacologic effects (dose dependent and predictable)
B bizarre effects (or idiosyncratic) (dose independent and unpredictable)
significant, persistent, or permanent change, impairment, damage or disruption in the patient's body function/structure, physical activities or quality of liferequires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage
congenital anomaly
What about antibiotics ?
20-06-2009 26th ICC 8
How to categorize ADR ?
•
Relatedness to drug
:
Nebeker et al., Ann Intern Med. (2004) 140:795-801
degree criteria Response to dechallenge
certain plausible time relationship to drug administration cannot be explained by concurrent disease / drugs
clinically plausible
probable likely
reasonable time sequence to drug administration unlikely to be attributed to concurrent disease / drugs
clinically reasonable
possible reasonable time sequence to drug administration could also be explained by concurrent disease / drugs
lacking or unclear
unlikely temporal relationship to drug administration makes a causal relationship improbable other drugs / underlying disease provide plausible explanations
-
need to be critically examined in post-marketing studies
20-06-2009 26th ICC 9
How to categorize ADR ?
•
Frequency
:
definition frequency
very frequent ≤
1/10
frequent ≤
1/100
not frequent ≤
1/1,000
rare ≤
1/10,000
very rare ≤
1/100,000
Importance of all types of post-marketing surveillance systems
(phase IV)
20-06-2009 26th ICC 10
Which type of ADR can limit antibiotic use ?
weigh
the benefit-risk
ratio !
20-06-2009 26th ICC 11
Which type of ADR can limit antibiotic use ?
unsevere
moderate
life – threatening
benefit : depends
on
the severity
of infection
risk : what
shall
you
accept
?
is
an antibiotic really
needed
?
is
a severe
ADR acceptable ?
benefit
rare ADR
>>>
20-06-2009 26th ICC 12
SafetySafety profile profile of the of the mostmost widelywidely usedused antibioticsantibiotics
Toronto argonaut
20-06-2009 26th ICC 13
Antibiotics recommended in CAP (outpatients)
Carbonnelle et al., ICC (2009) poster 315
20-06-2009 26th ICC 14
ADR with antibiotics recommended in CAP (SmPC)Class Most frequent or serious ADRβ-lactams (AMX-CLAV)
•
Anaphylactic reactions •
Clostridium difficile -associated colitis•
Digestive tract: diarrhoea, nausea•
Hepatic toxicity, including hepatitis and cholestatic
criticallycritically examinedexamined by registration by registration authoritiesauthorities
• cardiotoxicity
Toronto City Hall
• hepatotoxicity
20-06-2009 26th ICC 17
Hepatotoxicity
•
Usually idiosyncratic (can be associated with other allergic reactions). 1
•
Clavulanic acid: genetic deficiency in glutathione S-transferases
? 2
(longer latency period than other antibiotics…)
•
Macrolides: related to reactive metabolites (nitrosoalkanes) that covalently bind to proteins, forming modified antigens (immunoallergic
hepatitis) 3
•
Tetracyclines: related to inhibition of mitochondrial β-oxidation of fatty acids 4
•
Fluoroquinolones: remains anecdotal and unpredictable,1 except for for molecules with substituent-generating reactive intermediates
–
difluoroaniline
(temafloxacin
and trovafloxacin) 5
–
cyclopropylamine
(trovafloxacin; for which co-exposure to lipopolysaccharide
may also be critical) 6
1. Robles & Andrade, Rev Esp Quimioter. (2008) 21:224-332. Lucena et al., Hepatology (2008) 48:588-96.3. Pessayre et al., J Antimicrob Chemother (1985) 16 Suppl A: 181-944. Freneaux et al., Hepatology (1988) 8: 1056-625. Blum et al., Clin Infect Dis (1994) 18: 946-50; Chen et al., N Engl J Med (2000) 342:359-60; Lucena et al., Clin Infect Dis (2000)
30: 400-16. Sun et al., Chem Res Toxicol (2008) 21:711-9; Shaw et al., Toxicol Sci. (2009) 107:270-80
20-06-2009 26th ICC 18
Hepatotoxicity *
Van Bambeke & Tulkens, Drug Saf. (2009) 32:359-378
Antibiotic population Incidence rate (CI) per 100,000 users reference
fluoroquinolones (w/o moxifloxacin)
Outpatient clinic, Sweden
(1995-2005)0.7 (0.5-1.1) [1]
moxifloxacin Outpatient clinic, Sweden
(1995-2005)0.08 (0.0-0.5) [1]
cotrimoxazole Saskatchewan Health Plan, Canada (1982-1986)
1.0 (0.2-5.7) [2]
erythromycin Saskatchewan Health Plan, Canada (1982-1986)
2.0 (0.7-5.9) [2]
amoxicillin- clavulanic acid
General practice research database, United Kingdom (1991-1992)
22.5 (14.7-34.4) [3]
1. De Valle et al., Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2006) 24:1187-952. Perez et al., Epidemiology (1993) 4: 496-5013. Garcia-Rodriguez et al., Arch Intern Med (1996) 156: 1327-32
* international consensus: AAT/Alk. phos. ratio (hepatocellular: ≥
5; cholestatic: ≤
2 ; mixed: > 2 and < 5)
20-06-2009 26th ICC 19
Severe hepatotoxicity *
Antibiotic Acute liver failure a Critical event
moxifloxacin 6.6 1.6
levofloxacin 2.1 2.2
trovafloxacin 58 42.9
amoxi-clav 10
clarithromycin 1.0
azithromycin 1.0
telithromycin 23 5.8a Empiric Bayes
Geometric Mean (EBGM) studywww.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC/06/slides/2006-4266s1-01-07-FDA-Brinker.ppt
; presented December 2006 to FDA
Liver failure was defined as "acute or severe liver injury with encephalopathy, liver transplant following acute illness, death in the setting of acute liver injury (hospital. with transaminase
elevation, or hyperbilirubinaemia, or clinical jaundice)"
* FDA reporting rate per 10,000,000 prescriptions (spontaneous reports)
withdrawn from the market
restricted indications
Van Bambeke & Tulkens, Drug Saf. (2009) 32:359-378
20-06-2009 26th ICC 20
QTc prolongation
50
fluoxetine: 2
sparfloxacin: 15
terfenadine: 46
0 10 20 30 40 msec
erythromycin: 30
clarithromycin: 11-22
moxifloxacin: 6-10
Moxifloxacin is used as a positive control for QTc effect(s) in Phase I studies because it offers a positive signal without risk of clinically meaningful adverse effect !