Top Banner
Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR
18

Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Dec 29, 2015

Download

Documents

Joanna Stephens
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative

Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing

Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR

Page 2: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Collaborators

Kathie Shea RN, BSN, CNOR, Alameda County Research Chair and members of the research committee

Doris Gaw, RN, CNOR & Judy Carlson, RN, CNOR, Greater Kansas City Research Co-chairs and members of the research committee

Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR, University of Kansas, nurse scientist for the project.

Page 3: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Background

The Perioperative Nursing Data Set (PNDS) is a nationally recognized nursing language that offers the potential of standardized perioperative patient records. Phase 1 of this study used the Delphi consensus-building method to identify the minimum PNDS nursing interventions and expected outcomes believed by experienced nurses essential to patient documentation.

Page 4: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Purpose

Operationalize the minimum PNDS data elements identified by consensus for a universal written pre/intraoperative record

Clinically test the new written record in a variety of perioperative settings

Page 5: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Research Questions

Does the written pre/intraoperative record have clarity and ease of use in clinical practice?

What recommendations do experienced perioperative nurses suggest for improvement of the new written pre/intraoperative record?

Page 6: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Conceptual Framework

©AORN. Inc.

To maintain construct validity, interventions and outcomes were taken from original Perioperative Nursing Data Set documents published by AORN, Inc.

Page 7: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Phase 1: Minimum Data Identified

Phase 1 funded by AORN Foundation

PNDS

Agency Data

Universal Minimum Record

All Perioperative DataConsensus achieved as to the ideal minimum PNDS interventions and outcomes needed on a universal patient record

Page 8: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Phase 2: The Written Record

Check-box format Chronological order Content Validity 100%

agreement (n=21) Applicability to clinical

setting 98% agreement

Preoperative / Intraoperative

record

Page 9: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Sections of Record

Pre-admission Preop assessment Preparation

immediately before OR Intraoperative Postop and Discharge

from the OR

Preoperative / Intraoperative

record

Page 10: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Testing Procedure

No names of patients, surgeons, or facilities were recorded

Assigned case was documented in usual manner, then test chart was documented

Charting Rules:

check in box indicates yes

no mark in box indicates no or none

Page 11: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Testing Sample

38 RN volunteers, 29 with CNOR 57 Records tested

Urban/suburban -45 Rural-1222 KS, 13 MO, 12 CA10 unknown state

4-22 OR Rooms All surgical services in testing

Page 12: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Pre-Admit ExampleDate of Interview/Teaching ______________ Phone In facility Preoperative Teaching: Proposed Surgery __________________________________ Surgeon __________Teaching Protocol:_____________________________________________________

NPO Guidelines Time and*Date to Arrive:__________*_____Postop expectations Discharge See Nurses’ Notes

Advanced directive: On file Declines info Power of atty DNR verified Present for teaching: Patient Family Friend Translator____________Materials provided: Verbal Written Video Teaching by:__________Allergies:NKA (=yes has no known allergies)

Meds: _________________ Reactions_______________________Food: _________________ Reactions_______________________Prep Sol: ______________ Reactions_______________________Latex: if yes OR Notified Reactions_______________________

Infor given

*Indicates changes suggested: added terms

Page 13: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Preop Assessment Example

Skin: Warm Dry Cool Wet Without evidence of rash, swelling, inflammation

Musculoskeletal: Needs assistance Moves all extremities Steady balance/gait Limited mobility Pulses present in operative limb Pulses absent in operative limb

Neuro:Alert Memory intact Speech clear Hearing deficit Visual deficit Language deficitOriented Disoriented to: Person Place Time Situation Responds only with stimuli*Pain on a 0-10 scale (10 = high pain) _______ Location: ____________

*Needs to be bold to increase documentation of pain

Page 14: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Procedure/ID verification:ID/Allergy band present Surgical site marked by: Patient/family Surgeon StaffProcedure confirmed by Patient/family Surgeon StaffConsent signed/agrees with planned procedure

Home medications taken today. Time Medication

None Present Removed To family To PACUHearing Aid:

None Present Removed To family To PACUDentures/Partials:

None Present Removed To family To PACUContacts/Glasses:

None Present Removed To family To PACU

Consent for retained jewelry signed

Jewelry (describe, location)

Rm ____In safePACUFamilyBedside

Belongings Inventory:

Returned to patient/family by : ____________(Initials)

Piercings

Immediately Before Surgery

Page 15: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Positioning/Safety Aids: Safety Belt________ Warm blanket Head rest: Type __________ Pressure protection pad Site:_____________ Chest roll Shoulder roll Axillary roll Pillow/wedge Sandbag Beanbag Stirrup/*Leg Holder Boot Sling Cysto/Gyn padded with blanket Arm rest padded/secured: L R Arms tucked/padded: L R Other ______________________________________________________________ Body alignment checked Positioned by: _____________________________Skin Prep: Hair: Clipped Shaved __________ Hair removal by______________Iodophor scrub Iodophor solution Duraprep Hibiclens Alcohol Other_______Prep by _____________Wound class:

Site 1________________ I II III IV 4 No IncisionElectrocautery: Location __________________________

Unit #______ Coag/Cut ________ Pad _________ Location ______________Bipolar # ________ Setting _______________

Tourniquet: Location ___________ TestedUnit# ______ Setting ______ Up ____ Down _____ Applied by __________

Intraoperative Example

*Term unclear:

Page 16: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Discharge from ORPatient Outcomes at Discharge for OR

Postop Assessment at Discharge for OR

Physiological status within acceptable limits for discharge from OR

Skin warm and dry

Cool WetSkin color consistent with adequate profusionPulses present in operated extremity

Pulses absent operated extremityDressing dry and intactRespirations spontaneous

Assisted IntubatedConsciousness: able to follow directions

Non-responsiveResponds when stimulated

See discharge note

Page 17: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Content Analysis Summary

Positive Commentscheck marks minimal writingpostop assessmentcompletenessliked flow preop to

intraop

Negative Commentsseparate pre/intrachange sponge

count tableseparate sheet for

laser and local monitoring

want human graphic to label

Page 18: Collaboration Toward Universal Perioperative Documentation: Phase 2 Clinical Testing Susan V.M. Kleinbeck, RN, PhD, CNOR.

Perioperative Implications

A tested clinical record is prerequisite to the development of computerized standards for a universal perioperative patient record.

Phase 3 of the project will develop data field names with attached PNDS construct validity codes.