Top Banner
Collaboration and Technology Concluding Remarks By Stephen Downes ALT-C Manchester September 8
21

Collaboration and Technology

Feb 04, 2015

Download

Technology

Stephen Downes

Concluding Remarks by Stephen Downes at
ALT-C Manchester, UK, September 8, 2005
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Collaboration and Technology

Collaboration and Technology

Concluding Remarks

By Stephen Downes

ALT-C Manchester September 8

Page 2: Collaboration and Technology

The View from G Level

Page 3: Collaboration and Technology

The Mandate…

• What was the point (I was asked) of being here at this conference?

• What was the point of coming together?

• Do we critically reflect on theory, practice, or do we merely reinforce our existing prejudices?

• What do we take home?

Page 4: Collaboration and Technology

The Process…

• Opening remarks…

• Three days of short papers, research papers, posters, informal discussions

• Summaries collected by the Chairs and passed on to me

• This summary…

Page 5: Collaboration and Technology

The Terrain…

• Institutional Collaboration– E-College Wales, Kingston College, JISC,

CAMEL, League of European Research Universities

• Learner Collaboration– Talk2Learn, UKeU+York, CABWeb, BOGLE,

CALL

• Teacher Collaboration– COLA repository, LAMS, Critical Writing Skills

Page 6: Collaboration and Technology

James

Watt

Page 7: Collaboration and Technology

The Question…

• Is there a technology of collaboration?– (as in the wider sense of ‘technology’)

• Factors: trust, abilities, distance and infrastructure, funding…

• Methodologies: process, analysis, collaboration types

• Tools: Moodle WebCT, portals, conferencing, wikis…

Page 8: Collaboration and Technology

Presumptions (or Observations)

• Size of group… small groups are better, large groups “too chaotic” (too much conversation)

• Fixed (and short) duration

• Structured (sometimes heavily structured)

Contrast this with the concept of community…

Page 9: Collaboration and Technology

Cases in Point…

• Designing and Realising Collaborative Student Activities on CABWEB

• COLEG On Line Assessment Project

• The Question: can collaboration be reduced to filling out fields in a form?

• If not…

– Why not, but more importantly…

– Why would it be treated as if it could?

Page 10: Collaboration and Technology

The Collaborative Gene…

• Terri Kinnison: “What characteristics does an organization or system possess (and display) at a particular stage of collaborative partnership? Is there a collective ‘style’ that determines what collaboration is possible?”

Page 11: Collaboration and Technology

A Question of Methodology?

• Contrasting approaches to requirements gathering:– Barry Jones – build something and see what

users do– Janet McCracken – close study of users’

current practices, plus interviews to explain

• “Monolithic projects require monolithic methodology?” … ADDIE “Where was the creativity going to come from?”

Page 12: Collaboration and Technology

Canal Street

Page 13: Collaboration and Technology

A Question of Ontology?

• Is there an essence of collaboration that can be understood independently of…– The players?– The technology?

• Does what we are looking for reflect our theoretical stance? Do we need a theoretical stance?– Logical Positivist? Behaviourist? vs– Phenomenology? Critical Theory? Feminism?

Page 14: Collaboration and Technology

…Does Not Want to be Joined Up

• Why we think collaboration is a good idea… various suggestions offered by authors (share resources, learn new perspectives, etc.)

• Motivation… various motivations described included paying people, funding, grading people, funding, etc

Disconnect between these two?

Page 15: Collaboration and Technology

This Conference…

• An observation so common as to be hackneyed… once again, the vast majority of sessions were lectures

• Why? (Let’s not simply assume that what we are doing is inherently dysfunctional, but rather, that there is a reason for this)

• Contrast with the groans in the collaborative session – “We’re locking the doors”

Page 16: Collaboration and Technology

Chaos….

Page 17: Collaboration and Technology

You Are Free to Leave…

• In my view, the question of collaboration is a question of governance

• Parallel between collaboration theory and political theory, with descriptions ranging from authoritarianism to anarchy

• Anarchy was universally considered ‘bad’

• Can there be ‘too much’ conversation’?

• Are you free to leave?

Page 18: Collaboration and Technology

The Lecture…

• May be the form that (counterintuitively) offers maximal freedom to the audience

• And hence, may be favoured by learning professionals (at least in their own learning) because it preserves this degree of freedom

• Contrast: learning design, LAMS, linear design….

Page 19: Collaboration and Technology

Two Theories of Collaboration

• The essentialist theory… collaboration is based on some sort of sameness – same value, same outcome, same tool, same funding body … needs external motivation

• The exchange theory… collaboration is based on interaction between autonomous and diverse entities … based on intrinsic motivation

Page 20: Collaboration and Technology

Cold Cures…

• With this cure, you can cure a cold in only seven days, which left untreated would last as long as a week!

• The question: would collaboration occur even if we did nothing?

• And if so… is collaboration actually the objective of collaboration theory…

Page 21: Collaboration and Technology

www.downes.ca