COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London London COBECOS COBECOS Costs and Benefits of Control Costs and Benefits of Control Strategies Strategies Status of WP2- Data collection at September 2007 Italian case study: GSA 9 bottom trawling fishery Loretta Malvarosa ([email protected]) Paolo Accadia ([email protected])
17
Embed
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS Costs and Benefits of Control Strategies Status of WP2- Data collection at September 2007 Italian.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
COBECOSCOBECOS
Costs and Benefits of Control StrategiesCosts and Benefits of Control Strategies
Status of WP2- Data collection at September 2007Italian case study: GSA 9 bottom trawling fishery
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
The case study area: GSA 9. Ligurian and North The case study area: GSA 9. Ligurian and North Tirrenian SeaTirrenian Sea
GSA 9GSA 9
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
General setting of the fisheryGeneral setting of the fishery
• GSA 9 bottom trawling fishery is a multi-species and multi-GSA 9 bottom trawling fishery is a multi-species and multi-gear fishery.gear fishery.
• The fishery is focused on the bottom trawl segment, that is The fishery is focused on the bottom trawl segment, that is on vessels fishing exclusively or predominantly (fishing on vessels fishing exclusively or predominantly (fishing days >50%) with trawl nets.days >50%) with trawl nets.
• Multi-gear fishery: even if trawling is predominant, vessels Multi-gear fishery: even if trawling is predominant, vessels are provided, in many cases, by more than a license (in are provided, in many cases, by more than a license (in most cases by licenses for gillnets and long-lines).most cases by licenses for gillnets and long-lines).
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
General setting of the fishery – Indicators 1General setting of the fishery – Indicators 1
• Target speciesTarget species: first 5 species in terms of value on the average : first 5 species in terms of value on the average of the last 4 years. They represent, on average, 46% of total of the last 4 years. They represent, on average, 46% of total landings in value.landings in value.
Deepwater rose shrimp
7% Horned octopus
7% Striped mullet
8%
European hake 11%
Norway lobster 12%
Other 55%
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
General setting of the fishery – Indicators 2General setting of the fishery – Indicators 2
• Target species: trend in the last 4 years of value of landings (mio €).Target species: trend in the last 4 years of value of landings (mio €).
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Biological characteristics of the fishery – Biological characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 1Indicators 1
• Official landings from project fisheries (tons).Official landings from project fisheries (tons).• Landings are available by single species since 2003; by group of species (graph) since 2000.Landings are available by single species since 2003; by group of species (graph) since 2000.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
tons
2000 2002 2004 2006
Crustaceans Molluscs Finfish Small pelagics
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Biological characteristics of the fishery – Biological characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 2Indicators 2
• Total estimated removals from sea of Total estimated removals from sea of stock of target speciesstock of target species (includes only landings by (includes only landings by other fleets not included in the project; data on discards are not available) – tons, 2003-2006.other fleets not included in the project; data on discards are not available) – tons, 2003-2006.
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Biological characteristics of the fishery – Biological characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 2Indicators 2
• Total estimated removals from sea of Total estimated removals from sea of stock of target speciesstock of target species: : share of bottom trawlers on all the fleet segments operating in GSA 9.share of bottom trawlers on all the fleet segments operating in GSA 9.
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
2003 2004 2005 2006
Deepwater roseshrimpHorned octopus
European hake
Striped mullet
Norway lobster
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Biological characteristics of the fishery – Biological characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 3Indicators 3
• As far as other biological characteristics of the fishery , IREPA has taken contact with relevant national biological institutes in order to As far as other biological characteristics of the fishery , IREPA has taken contact with relevant national biological institutes in order to gather all the necessary data. gather all the necessary data.
• At the moment we are waiting for data. In our opinion no relevant difficulties will be encountered in collecting this type of data.At the moment we are waiting for data. In our opinion no relevant difficulties will be encountered in collecting this type of data.
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Socio-economic characteristics of the fishery – Socio-economic characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 1Indicators 1
• Landings value (mio €).Landings value (mio €).• Landings in value are available by single species since 2003; by group of species (graph) since 2000.Landings in value are available by single species since 2003; by group of species (graph) since 2000.
0
20
40
60
80
100
mio
€
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Crustaceans Molluscs Finfish Small pelagics
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Socio-economic characteristics of the fishery – Socio-economic characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 2Indicators 2
• Prices of target species, 2003-2006 (€/kg). Table shows only price Prices of target species, 2003-2006 (€/kg). Table shows only price of target species.of target species.
Average price Average price target speciestarget species
10.7210.72 11.4911.49 11.0011.00 9.919.91
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Socio-economic characteristics of the fishery – Socio-economic characteristics of the fishery – Indicators 3Indicators 3
• Economic data (income, costs, G.V.A., gross cash flow) – mio €, 2002-2003. Gross cash flow is Economic data (income, costs, G.V.A., gross cash flow) – mio €, 2002-2003. Gross cash flow is preferred to net profit because the estimation procedure of capital costs is changed in the latest preferred to net profit because the estimation procedure of capital costs is changed in the latest years.years.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
mio
€
Income
OperationalcostsG.V.A.
Gross cashflow
COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London COBECOS II meeting, 5-7 September 2007, London
Management and enforcement of the fishery Management and enforcement of the fishery
• The text and the data harmonisation related to the management of the fishery is under construction. The text and the data harmonisation related to the management of the fishery is under construction. • As far as the enforcement data, IREPA has taken contact with Harbour offices in order to gather all the necessary data. At the moment no data have been delivered.As far as the enforcement data, IREPA has taken contact with Harbour offices in order to gather all the necessary data. At the moment no data have been delivered.• Taking into account the level of detail requested by the project on the enforcement data, we think that some difficulties could be encountered in gathering all the Taking into account the level of detail requested by the project on the enforcement data, we think that some difficulties could be encountered in gathering all the
data. This could imply, in some cases, the use of estimation procedures.data. This could imply, in some cases, the use of estimation procedures.