Jun 07, 2015
Contents :
Definition of Co-integration . Different Approaches of Co-integration. Johansen and Juselius (J.J) Co-integration. Error Correction Model (ECM). Interpretation of ECM term. Long – Run Co-integration Equation.
Definition of Co-integration
The concept of cointegration was first introduced by Granger (1981) and elaborated further by Engle and Granger (1987), Engle and Yoo (1987), Phillips and Ouliaris (1990), Stock and Watson (1988), Phillips (1986 and 1987) and johansen (1988, 1991, 1995a).Time series Yt and Xt are said to be cointegrated of order d, where d > 0, written as Yt, Xt ~ CI (d). If (a) Both series are integrated of order d, (b) There exists a linear combination of these variables.
Examples :
The old woman and the boy are
unrelated to one another, except
that they are both on a random
walk in the park. Information
about the boy's location tells us
nothing about the old woman's
location.
The old man and the dog are joined by one of
those leashes that has the cord rolled up inside
the handle on a spring. Individually, the dog and
the man are each on a random walk. They cannot
wander too far from one another because of the
leash. We say that the random processes
describing their paths are cointegrated.
Approaches of Co-integration :
Engle-Granger (1987)
Used when only one co integrating vector is under consideration
Johansen and Juselius (1990)
Used when more than one co integrating vector are under
consideration
Conditions Of Co-integration :
If all variables are stationary on level , we use OLS method of estimation. If all variables or single variable are stationary on first difference , we use Co-integration Method. If all the variables are stationary on first difference , we use Johnson Co-integration and ARDL also. If some variables are stationary on level and some are stationary on first difference , we only use ARDL model.
Johansen and Juselius (1990) J.J Co-integration : If all the variables are stationary on first difference , we use
Johnson Co-integration. Although Johansen’s methodology is typically used in a
setting where all variables in the system are I(1), having stationary variables in the system is theoretically not an issue and Johansen (1995) states that there is little need to pre-test the variables in the system to establish their order of integration.
Johansen Co-integration :
Johansen, Is a procedure for testing cointegration of several I(1) time series. This test permits more than one cointegrating relationship so is more generally applicable than the engle–granger test .
Yt = α0 + α1x1t + α2x2t + et
Yt = α0 + α1x1t + α2x1t-1 + α3x2t + α4x2t-1 + et
Steps For Johnson Co-integration : STEP 1:-
Check stationarity take only those variables which are stationary at 1st difference.
STEP 2:- File/new workfile/structured and dated/start date & end
date CLICK OK. Paste the data. STEP 3:- Quick/Group statistic/Co-integration test Write variables name CLICK OK
Steps of j-j cointegrationDate: 05/06/14 Time: 07:04 Sample (adjusted): 1981 2010 Included observations: 30 after adjustments
Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend Series: LPGDP LINV LATAX LPS Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)
Hypothesized Trace 0.05 No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**
None * 0.620080 53.12601 47.85613 0.0147At most 1 0.376331 24.09216 29.79707 0.1966
At most 2 0.265635 9.928096 15.49471 0.2863At most 3 0.021943 0.665631 3.841466 0.4146
Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
Definition of Error Correction Model If, then, Yr and Xt are cointegrated, by definition ftr ~ /(0).
Thus, we can express the relationship between Yt and Xr with an ECM specification as:
∆Yt= a0 + b1∆Xt-µ^t-1 + Yt
In this model, b1 is the impact multiplier (the short-run effect) that measures the immediate impact that a change in Xt will have on a change in Yt . On the other hand πt is the feedback effect, or the adjustment effect, and shows how much of this disequilibrium is being corrected.
Steps For VAR Estimate :
STEPS :-Quick /Estimate VARVAR type: Vector Error Correction.Endogenous variables:- All variables nameLag intervals:-1 ,1 CLICK OK
Vector Error Correction Estimates Date: 05/26/14 Time: 22:36 Sample (adjusted): 1981 2010 Included observations: 30 after adjustments Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]
Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1
LPGDP(-1) 1.000000
LINV(-1) -4.620559 (0.47459) [-9.73587]
LATAX(-1) -3.350165 (1.20384) [-2.78289]
LPS(-1) 1.274220 (0.49822) [ 2.55755] C -3.861790
Error Correction: D(LPGDP) D(LINV) D(LATAX) D(LPS)
CointEq1 -0.011599 0.167417 -0.004750 -0.060848 (0.02160) (0.04974) (0.02840) (0.03017) [-0.53695] [ 3.36570] [-0.16725] [-2.01682]
Estimation of ECM value :
If T value is 1.67 or more than 1.70 then we conclude that variable is significant…. OR when Tcal is > 1.70 or when Tcal = 1.67 We conclude variable is significant… Where there’s –ve sign we consider it +ve as the value of Linv is -4.62 we consider it +ve and conclude that the there is +ve relationship between lpgdp and linv…… In Coint Equ 1 the value of Lpgdp is -0.01 which shows Convergence to equilibrium and 1 % convergance in one year
Lag Length Criteria : STEPS :-
Go to The view of result window of VAR Estimate. Go to Lag Length Structure and select Lag Length
Criteria. In Lag specification Select the lags to include as 3. Click OK
VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria
Endogenous variables: LPGDP LINV LATAX LPS
Exogenous variables: C
Date: 05/06/14 Time: 08:50
Sample: 1979 2010
Included observations: 29
Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ
0 145.5371 NA 6.78e-10 -9.761179 -9.572586 -9.702114
1 273.4307 211.6859* 3.06e-13* -17.47798* -16.53501* -17.18265*
2 288.0984 20.23135 3.60e-13 -17.38610 -15.68876 -16.85451
3 295.8181 8.518318 7.70e-13 -16.81504 -14.36334 -16.04720
* indicates lag order selected by the criterion
LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at 5% level)
FPE: Final prediction error
AIC: Akaike information criterion
SC: Schwarz information criterion shows the lag length 1 .
HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion
Long Run Equation For Results :
LPGDP = α + β1 LINV + β2 LATAX + β3 LPS
LPGDP = 3.86 +4.62 LINV + 3.35 LATAX – 1.27 LPS.
REFRENCES : http://www.google.com.pk/url?
sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eco.uc3m.es%2Fjgonzalo%2Fteaching%2FtimeseriesMA%2Fspuriousregandcointegration.ppt&ei=3IWDU8KIFKXm7Aa1q4GgAQ&usg=AFQjCNEMeDrxYrVbmOezMTPaUHqr7Fmsbw&sig2=oDcwQxDEQ64CZxFKeobvkg&bvm=bv.67720277,d.ZGU
powershow.com/view/9d319-MzYzM/TIME_SERIES_REGRESSION_COINTEGRATION_powerpoint_ppt_presentation
.google.com.pk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDMQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.uh.edu%2F~bsorense%2Fcoint.pdf&ei=SIiDU5vzFuSU7QbNpYC4Dw&usg=AFQjCNFCyaKrvkcaE_VVe8GwmhEeMv46Iw&sig2=sRUVQeVm32aykeFpV2Ds7w
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/wp07141.pdf Applied Economics By Esterio. Basic Econometrics By Damodar Gujrati.