Top Banner
Article III: The Judicial Branch
17

“Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Article III: The Judicial Branch

Page 2: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Brought to you by the Supreme Court

“Clear and Present Danger”

“Substantial Disruption”

“Undue burden”

“trimester verdict”

“reasonable suspicion”

“exclusionary rule”

“executive privilege”

Citizens United

“Bong Hits for Jesus”

Page 3: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

The United States Supreme Court

Ruth Ginsberg

1993

Chief JusticeJohn

Roberts2005

Clarence Thomas

1991

Anthony Kennedy

1988

AntoninScalia1986

Samuel Alito2005

Stephen Breyer1994

SonyaSotomayor

2009

Elena Kagan2010

Page 4: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Court makeup 9 Justices total.

• 8 Associate Justices• 1 Chief Justice

Term: Life Pay

• Justices each make $213,900. Chief makes $223, 500.

Appointed• by President, approved by Senate

Page 5: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Sections

•Judicial Review

•Jurisdiction

•Ways to the Court

•Proceeedings

•Decisions

•Cases

Page 6: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Judicial Review In ruling the Judiciary Act of 1789

unconstitutional in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall established judicial review.

The Supreme Court proclaimed the power to declare acts of Congress (and others) unconstitutional thus empowering

the Judicial Branch.

Page 7: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Jurisdiction Original: heard first in a particular court

• Ex: government officials, two states Appellate: heard on appeal from a lower

court• Ex: can uphold, overrule, or modify

Exclusive: heard only in federal courts• Ex: ambassador, foreign official, federal crime

Concurrent: shared power between federal and state courts• Ex: citizens from different states

Authority to hear a case

Page 8: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Ways to the Court: Writ of Certiorari

Order by the Supreme Court directing a lower court to send up the record in a given case.

Latin for “to be made more certain”

Page 9: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”
Page 10: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Ways to the Court: Certificate A lower court has

asked the Supreme Court for a ruling or clarification on a case.

Rule of four applies. Four of the justices must agree to hear the case.

Page 11: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Ways to the Court: Appeals High percentage

of all cases reach the court from lower court appeals.

State, Constitutional, and Special courts all feed the Supreme Court.

Page 12: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Federal Court System

Page 13: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Proceedings Rule of Four: Four of the nine justices

must agree to hear a case.

Docket: The Supreme Court’s agenda.• The court receives over 10,000 cases for

review.

Page 14: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Proceedings: Briefs/O.A. Briefs

• Written statements from attorneys describing their arguments in the case.

• Amicus Curiae: Means “friend of the court” Briefs allowed for submission by outsiders. ie.

Organizations/Special Interests

Oral Arguments• 30 minutes for each side. Interrupted by

questioning from the justices.

Page 15: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Proceedings: Oral Arguments

Page 16: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Decisions Majority Opinion

• Decided by the chief justice, it is the official ruling of the court.

Dissenting Opinion• Opinion of the justices that

disagree with ruling

Concurring Opinion• Justices that agree, but upon

different grounds or reasons

Page 17: “Clear and Present Danger” “Substantial Disruption” “Undue burden” “trimester verdict” “reasonable suspicion” “exclusionary rule” “executive privilege”

Vocabulary•Judicial Review•Jurisdiction• Original• Appellate• Exclusive• Concurrent•Write of certiorari•Certificate•Appeal

•Rule of four•Docket •Briefs•Amicus Curiae•Oral arguments

•Majority opinion•Dissenting opinion•Concurring opinion