TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Cleanup Status Report – No. 18 Period of September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007 Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site PREPARED FOR: Bart Cañellas/EPA Sabino Rivera/NMED City of Albuquerque PREPARED BY: CH2M HILL COPY TO: William LeFevre/CH2M HILL Jeff Gamlin/CH2M HILL Kevin Bral/CH2M HILL Mike Brewer/CH2M HILL Amy Halloran/CH2M HILL Peter van Noort/CH2M HILL PREPARED UNDER: EPA Region 6 Response Action Contract No. 68-W6-0036 Work Assignment No. 127-RARA-06DD DCN 0003-02023 DATE: January 18, 2008 1.0 Introduction This quarterly cleanup status report (CSR) summarizes operation and maintenance (O&M) activities and monitoring data for the pump and treat (P&T) system operated as part of the selected remedy for the Fruit Avenue Plume (FAP) Superfund Site (CERCLIS No. NMD986668911) located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. This report describes O&M activities performed on the system from September 28, 2007 through December 29, 2007. The FAP Superfund Site (Site) is identified on the National Priorities List (NPL) as a chlorinated solvent ground water plume located in the downtown area of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The primary contaminant of concern (COC) in the ground water at the Site is trichloroethene (TCE) with lesser amounts of tetrachloroethene (PCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE), and trans-1,2-DCE. A treatment system was constructed between August 2004 and September 2005. Routine operations of the system started on November 18, 2005. A summary of startup operations may be found in Cleanup Status Report No. 1 (CH2M HILL, 2006). The system consists of one ground water extraction well (D2E-P1), two injection wells that contain a total of three screened intervals for re-injection of treated 345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 1 JANUARY 2008
85
Embed
Cleanup Status Report - Records Collections · 2019-12-10 · This quarterly cleanup status report (CSR) summarizes operation and maintenance (O&M) activities ... Status Report No.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M
Cleanup Status Report – No. 18 Period of September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007 Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site PREPARED FOR: Bart Cañellas/EPA
Sabino Rivera/NMED City of Albuquerque
PREPARED BY: CH2M HILL COPY TO: William LeFevre/CH2M HILL
Jeff Gamlin/CH2M HILL Kevin Bral/CH2M HILL Mike Brewer/CH2M HILL Amy Halloran/CH2M HILL Peter van Noort/CH2M HILL
PREPARED UNDER: EPA Region 6 Response Action Contract No. 68-W6-0036 Work Assignment No. 127-RARA-06DD
DCN 0003-02023 DATE: January 18, 2008
1.0 Introduction This quarterly cleanup status report (CSR) summarizes operation and maintenance (O&M) activities
and monitoring data for the pump and treat (P&T) system operated as part of the selected remedy for
the Fruit Avenue Plume (FAP) Superfund Site (CERCLIS No. NMD986668911) located in
Albuquerque, New Mexico. This report describes O&M activities performed on the system from
September 28, 2007 through December 29, 2007.
The FAP Superfund Site (Site) is identified on the National Priorities List (NPL) as a chlorinated
solvent ground water plume located in the downtown area of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The
primary contaminant of concern (COC) in the ground water at the Site is trichloroethene (TCE) with
lesser amounts of tetrachloroethene (PCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE), and trans-1,2-DCE. A
treatment system was constructed between August 2004 and September 2005. Routine operations of
the system started on November 18, 2005. A summary of startup operations may be found in Cleanup
Status Report No. 1 (CH2M HILL, 2006). The system consists of one ground water extraction well
(D2E-P1), two injection wells that contain a total of three screened intervals for re-injection of treated
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 1 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
water into the aquifer (single injection well (D2E-I3) and the dual injection well (I2/D1E-I1)), and an
air stripper treatment system. The treatment system location is shown in Figure 1; the layout of the
system is provided in Figure 2.
The FAP Superfund Site Record of Decision (EPA, 2001) established a remediation action objective
(RAO) for operation of the treatment system that prevents human ingestion of, inhalation of, or
dermal contact with ground water that contains concentrations of PCE above 5 micrograms per liter
(µg/L), TCE above 5 µg/L, DCE above 70 µg/L, and trans-1,2-DCE above 100 µg/L (these are the
Maximum Contaminant Level Goals [MCLGs] set by the Clean Water Act (or are MCLs where
MCLGs are set at zero)).
To meet this RAO and Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs), the
treatment system has the following operational goals:
• COCs at concentrations less than MCLs at the ASTP effluent,
• Air emissions below state and federal threshold levels, and
• Maintain >80% run time.
2.0 Operations Summary This section summarizes the field activities and presents the operational data that were collected from
the treatment system during the reporting period. Operational highlights for this reporting period are
presented in Table 1 and a summary of O&M activities is presented in Table 2. The performance of
the treatment system was monitored by onsite staff, and by remote monitoring of the SCADA system.
A list of ASTP operational parameters monitored is included in Table 3. Onsite observations of non-
SCADA operational parameters were recorded on inspection data log forms. Data from the
inspection data log forms for system monitoring and operational activities through this reporting
period are reported in Table 4.
Routine O&M activities included bag filter changes, acid pump adjustments, injection well
disinfection and back flushing, and performance sampling. The ASTP has been running almost
continuously since it was started on February 19, 2007.
2.1 System Downtime The treatment plant was operational 2121 hours of a possible 2211 hours, or 96% of the reporting
period. The ASTP runtime calculation and history are presented in Table 5.
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 2 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
The goal of exceeding 80% run time was achieved
during this reporting period.
Downtime during this reporting period occurred primarily during unintentional shutdowns due to the
reinjection pump tripping its main circuit breaker. Discussions of ASTP shut down events are
included below in Section 2.3 and Section 2.4.1. A small amount of the downtime (less than five
hours) during this reporting period was related to normal operations and maintenance such as
injection well disinfection, back flushing, and changing the bag filters.
2.2 Operational Data and Process Monitoring Data The ASTP SCADA system continuously monitors several operational and process monitoring
parameters. Non-SCADA parameters are monitored by the operator. A list of quantitative
operational and process monitoring data is available in Table 3. Figure 2 illustrates the locations of
the water and exhaust sampling ports, SCADA monitoring instruments, and the location on non-
SCADA instruments. The data recorded by the SCADA system is saved on a hard drive associated
with the computer system. The hard drive is backed up each weekday. The non-SCADA data
recorded by the operator on the inspection data log forms are included in Attachment A. Field notes
are included in Attachment B.
2.2.1 Plant Influent and Effluent, and Efficiency of Aboveground Treatment Components The ASTP has been running almost continuously since it was started on February 19, 2007. During
this reporting period, none of the treated groundwater was discharged to the sanitary sewer. The
ASTP has been operating at an injection rate from 75 gpm to 89 gpm with an average of 84 gpm. The
total injection rate is currently approximately 86 gpm. This injection rate is within the range of flow
rates that the treatment system was expected to operate (80 gpm to 100 gpm).
The cumulative and monthly volumes of ground water treated and reinjected by the ASTP are
presented in Table 6 and Figure 3. Through the end of this reporting period, a cumulative total of
approximately 76,400,000 gallons of water have been pumped from the extraction well and treated by
the air stripper; approximately 74,200,000 gallons of treated water have been re-injected via the
injection well system, and approximately 1,900,000 gallons of treated water have been discharged to
the sanitary sewer. During this reporting period, approximately 11,000,000 gallons of water have
been pumped from the extraction well and treated by the air striper. All of the treated water was
returned to the aquifer, and none was discharged to the sanitary sewer.
Nearly 4.2 million gallons of contaminated water
was treated and returned to the aquifer in
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 3 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
November 2007, the most since the start of ASTP
operations.
Recently measured COC concentrations in the ASTP influent (sample port SP-1) and effluent (sample
port SP-5) are summarized in Table 7. Analytical laboratory reports are included in Attachment C.
The sample results indicate that COC’s are not
detectable in the ASTP effluent.
The mass removal of COCs by the treatment system during this reporting period was estimated based
on the total volume of ground water pumped from the extraction well during the reporting period and
the difference between the influent and treated (effluent) water concentrations as measured during the
October 28, 2007 sampling event. A concentration of one-half the detection limit (0.25 μg/L during
this reporting period) was used if a particular COC was not detected in the treated water sample.
Calculations of the contaminant mass removed by the system are illustrated in Attachment D. The
cumulative and monthly mass of COCs removed from ground water since the treatment system
commenced operations are presented in Table 8 and illustrated in Figure 4. Approximately 4.9
kilograms (kg) of VOCs (consisting of TCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and trans-1,2-DCE) are estimated to have
been removed from the ground water aquifer since the treatment system began operation. PCE has
not been detected in the influent water samples.
All previously collected air emissions samples have shown that concentrations and emissions were
below applicable regulatory standards. Since the influent concentrations of VOCs in ground water
have not varied appreciably since startup, the concentrations observed in the air emissions were not
expected to have appreciably changed. Therefore, an air emissions sample was not collected during
this reporting period.
Air emissions have been and are expected to remain below
state and federal threshold levels
2.2.2 Extraction Well Data Throughout the reporting period, the pumping rate for the extraction well (D2E-P1) ranged from
77 to 91 gpm. The pumping rate is modulated by the SCADA system to maintain a flow balance with
the re-injection system. The extraction well pump runs continuously except during system
shutdowns.
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 4 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
It is expected that the conclusions of the 2006 capture zone evaluation (CH2M HILL, 2006b) are
applicable because the ASTP has resumed operation at approximately the same flow rate as was
included in the capture zone evaluation reported in the March 2006 CSR.
• Little or no capture is occurring in the I2 zone. The extraction well is screened across the D2
zone only and does not appear to be affecting the I2 zone.
• In the D1 zone, capture of contaminants identified by the monitor well SFMW-22 appears
successful. Contaminants downstream and south of the pumping well are not being captured.
• In the D2 zone, capture of contaminants identified by the monitor well SFMW-23 appears
successful. Contaminants downstream and south of the pumping well are not being captured.
Contaminants upstream of the pumping well will likely not be captured as they would tend to
move around the injection boundary.
In summary, the vertical and horizontal extent of the capture zone is as was expected when the
location of the extraction well was selected (CH2M HILL, 2004).
2.2.3 Injection Well Data The flow of treated water to the injection wells is manually controlled through the SCADA system to
maintain a fixed flow rate at each injection well. The FCVs are programmed to stop injection when
the water in the well reaches a predetermined level. The injection FCVs are currently programmed to
maintain water levels below 20 feet below ground surface and achieve the following approximate
flows:
• 48 gpm to the single injection well (D2E-I3).
• 35 gpm to the dual injection well (I2/D1E-I1).
The specific capacity of the injection wells was evaluated from data collected twice during the
reporting period (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The specific capacity of the injection wells appears to be
decreasing (draw up is increasing at fixed flow). There are several possible causes this which will be
evaluated and discussed in the next CSR. At this time, the injection wells still maintain their capacity
long enough to allow back flushing to be conducted approximately every eight weeks.
2.3 Problems Encountered With P&T Component Operation The ASTP has been running relatively problem free. During this reporting period the effects of the
plant upgrades and modifications completed over the past few months have paid off with nearly
continuous operation of the ASTP. One problem remains:
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 5 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
A recurring problem has been that the reinjection pump frequently trips its circuit breaker. During
this reporting period the reinjection pump motor bearings were replaced, and this seems to have
greatly reduced the frequency of shut downs. After the bearing replacement the ASTP ran for
approximately five weeks without an unintentional shut down. The circuit breaker has tripped several
times on two different days since the bearings were replaced, suggesting that there may be a
secondary cause of the shutdowns. At this time, we are uncertain of the exact cause of the pump
shutdown and are working to correct it.
2.4 System Modifications, Maintenance, and Testing The purpose of this section is to summarize routine and non-routine maintenance and system
modifications performed during this reporting period and to identify maintenance activities scheduled
for the next reporting period.
2.4.1 Routine Maintenance As part of the routine maintenance procedures for the treatment system, each injection well is back
flushed. A detailed description of back flushing operations is included in the March 2006 CSR#5.
During this reporting period, the injection wells were back flushed on October 19, 2007 and
December 20, 2007. Additional back flushing is scheduled for the next reporting period.
The injection wells were disinfected approximately weekly through the reporting period using a
sodium hypochlorite solution. The effectiveness of routine disinfection, back flushing, and
redevelopment procedures are evident from the sustained reinjection well flow rates and relatively
steady water levels.
Additional routine maintenance performed during this reporting period included changing the bag
filters. Changing the bag filters requires that the ASTP be shut down long enough to drain the filter
canisters. Both the influent (BF#1) and effluent filter bags (BF#2) were changed during the reporting
period (Table 2).
The air stripper view windows have remained generally clear and pressure in the air stripper has
remained within acceptable limits, so cleaning of the air stripper trays was not required during this
reporting period.
The acid pump stroke length was adjusted several times during the reporting period. The stroke
length needs to be adjusted in response to seasonal air temperature changes while the SCADA system
can adjust the acid pump pulse rate in response to daily air temperature changes. Approximately
24,680 pounds of sulfuric acid (three loads) was delivered during the reporting period.
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 6 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
Routine performance sampling of influent and treated water was conducted on October 29, 2007. The
results of performance sampling are used in this report to evaluate the efficiency of the treatment
system and to estimate the quantity of contaminants removed from the aquifer.
2.4.2 System Modifications and Non-Routine Maintenance One non-routing maintenance activity was conducted during the reporting period.
• The reinjection pump motor bearings were replaced in response to overheating. The overheating
had been causing system shutdowns approximately once per week. This frequency of shut downs
has decreased dramatically since the bearing replacement, but infrequent recurrence suggests that
there is a secondary cause of the shut downs.
3.0 Conclusions The ASTP is running quite well and all three goals of the RAO are being met. Based on the
monitoring and observations made during this reporting period, the following quantitative
conclusions were developed:
• The treatment system was in operation for about 2121 hours (96%) of the reporting period
(September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007).
• Approximately 11 million gallons of water were pumped from the aquifer and treated.
• An estimated 0.68 kg of total VOCs (consisting of TCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and trans-1,2-DCE) were
removed from the ground water aquifer during this reporting period.
• The ASTP achieved two new records: After replacement of the reinjection pump motor bearings
the plant ran for more than 5 weeks without an unintentional system shutdown, and a record high
of nearly 4.2 million gallons of contaminated water per month was treated and returned to the
aquifer in November 2007.
4.0 Recommendations/Upcoming Activities Normal operations, including influent and effluent water sampling, injection well disinfection and
back flushing, acid deliveries, and system maintenance will continue during the December 2007 to
March 2008 operation period.
We expect the next quarterly reporting period to be complete on March 28, 2007.
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 7 JANUARY 2008
FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT 18 –OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 2007
VERSION 1.0
5.0 References CH2M HILL, 2004 Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site Remedial Action: Interim System
Evaluation. February 17 2004[DCN 04-5995]
CH2M HILL, 2006. Cleanup Status Report No. 1 – Startup Version 1.0. Fruit Avenue Plume
Superfund Site. Albuquerque, New Mexico. January 2006.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2001. Record of Decision. Fruit Avenue Plume Site.
Albuquerque, New Mexico (CERCLIS # NMD986668911). September 2001.
345406\FAP_CSR_18_TEXT_2007-12.DOC 8 JANUARY 2008
Tables
Table 1ASTP Operational Highlights (September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico
October November December SummaryReporting Period Start Date 9/28/07 1:00 PM 10/26/07 12:00 PM 11/30/07 12:00 PM 9/28/07 1:00 PMReporting Period End Date 10/26/07 12:00 PM 11/30/07 12:00 PM 12/29/07 4:00 PM 12/29/07 4:00 PMASTP operation time [hrs] 601 837 683 2,121Total volume [gal] of gw pumped during the reporting period 3.1E+06 4.2E+06 3.5E+06 1.1E+07Total volume [gal] of gw injected during the reporting period 3.1E+06 4.2E+06 3.4E+06 1.1E+07Total mass [kg] of TCE and other VOCs removedduring the reporting period 0.20 0.27 0.22 0.68Total mass [lbs] of TCE and other VOCs removedduring the reporting period 0.43 0.59 0.49 1.50Percent operational during the reporting period 90% 100% 98% 96%
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Date ActivitySeptember 28, 2007 Begin reporting period (13:00)September 28, 2007 Test for cavitation and flow rates at FCV3131 (single injection well).September 30, 2007 High WL in AS Sump - ASTP shutdown (07:02 to 08:00)
High WL in AS Sump - ASTP shutdown (14:56 to 15:57)October 1, 2007 Injection total flow increased from 81 to 85 gpm
pH control is weakeningOctober 2, 2007 PSI & Flows spontaneously change - suspect cla valve.October 3, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length 73% to 72%October 8, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length 72% to 71%
Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each injection well.
October 10, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (13:01 to 13:30)Cla valve adjusted to get pressures up.Low flow alarm during O&M - ASTP shutdown (13:54 to 13:56)
October 11, 2007 Reboot HMIOctober 14, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (02:54 to 03:43)
Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (09:36 to 10:42)October 15, 2007 Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each
injection well. October 17, 2007 Sulfuric Acid delivery received.October 18, 2007 ASTP training for backup operator.
Training - ASTP shutdown (029:34 to 09:51)Training - ASTP shutdown (09:57 to 9:59)
October 19, 2007 Back flush injection wells.Backflushing (High level alarms) - ASTP shutdown (08:40 to 09:19)Backflushing (High level alarms) - ASTP shutdown (09:45 to 10:00)Backflushing (High level alarms) - ASTP shutdown (12:28 to 13:09)High pH alarm - ASTP shutdown (13:19 to 13:29)
October 20, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (01:00 to 01:25)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (01:40 to 01:45)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (09:45 to 10:16)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (10:38 to 10:43)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (11:57 to 20:14)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (21:20)
October 21, 2007 ASTP restarted (13:48)October 22, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (10:45)October 23, 2007 ASTP restarted (10:17)
Adjust acid stroke length from 72% to 70%Reinjection pump not in remote (Heater tripped this time) - ASTP shutdown (13:03 to 13:43)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (21:39)
October 24, 2007 ASTP restarted (06:54)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (11:23 to 12:39)
October 25, 2007 Change effluent bag filters - ASTP shutdown (15:08 to 15:32)October 26, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (11:27 to 13:53)
Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each injection well.
October 26, 2007 End of reporting period (12:00)
Table 2ASTP O&M Activities (September 28, 2007 to October 26, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Date ActivityOctober 26, 2007 Begin reporting period (12:00)October 28, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (00:15 to 00:48)October 29, 2007 Performance Sampling of influent and effluent process water.November 2, 2007 Replace reinjection pump motor bearings - ASTP shutdown (09:50 to
12:12)Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each injection well.
November 6, 2007 Reboot HMINovember 8, 2007 Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each
injection well. November 14, 2007 Reboot HMINovember 15, 2007 Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each
injection well. November 16, 2007 Change effluent bag filter - ASTP shutdown (14:58 to 15:20)November 21, 2007 Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each
injection well. Sulfuric Acid delivery received.
November 27, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length to 67%November 28, 2007 Begin reporting period (13:00)November 29, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length to 65%November 30, 2007 Reboot HMI
End of reporting period (12:00)
Table 2 - ContinuedASTP O&M Activities (October 26, 2007 to November 29, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Date ActivityNovember 30, 2007 Begin reporting period (12:00)December 3, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length from 67% to 71%
Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each injection well.
December 4, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length from 71% to 73%December 6, 2007 Change influent and effluent bag filters.
ASTP shutdown (14:47 to 15:35)December 7, 2007 Change acid pump stroke length from 73% to 76%
Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each injection well.
December 9, 2007 Low pH Alarm - ASTP shutdown (07:24 to 10:24)December 11, 2007 Disinfect injection wells w/ 6-gallons of 6% NaHClO solution in each
injection well. December 12, 2007 Low pH Alarm - ASTP shutdown (07:11 to 07:37)
Change acid pump stroke length from 76% to 73%Change acid pump stroke length to 74.5%
December 13, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (10:30 to 16:34)Change acid pump stroke length from 75% to 76%Change acid pump stroke length from 76% to 77%Space heaters turned on
December 20, 2007 Back flush injection wells - ASTP runs in batch mode.December 22, 2007 Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (06:23 to 07:54)
Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (11:30 to 12:25)Reinjection pump not in remote - ASTP shutdown (13:18 to 21:49)
December 26, 2007 Low flow alarm (effluent bag filter) - ASTP shutdown (03:52 to 04:57)short acid boost (16:34) to knock pH down
December 27, 2007 Sulfuric Acid delivery received.December 29, 2007 End of reporting period (16:00)
Table 2 - ContinuedASTP O&M Activities (November 30, 2007 to December 29, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site
Table 3List of ASTP Operational Parameters MonitoredFruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico
Trended Parameters - SCADA parametersFlow rates at each extraction and injection well head and the total injection flow (4 locations)Water levels in each extraction and injection well and the equalization tank (4 locations)Pressure at each injection well head and the reinjection pump (3 locations)Valve position for FCVs at each extraction and injection well (3 valves)Blower air discharge rate (SCFM)Blower discharge pressure (inches of water)Blower airflow rate (scfm)pH of water after air stripperAcid pump speed (% of maximum rate)Acid level in the acid storage tankNon-Trended Parameters - SCADA parametersExtraction well hours of operation (hours)Injection pump hours of operation (hours)Air stripper blower hours of operation (hours)Acid pump hours of operation (hours)Transfer pump hours of operation (hours)Extraction well flow totalizer (gallons)Treated water injection total volume injected (gallons)Treated water injection gallons injected to single well (gallons)Treated water injection gallons injected to dual well (gallons)Non-Trended / Non-SCADA parametersInfluent water pressure (psi)Post pre-treatment bag-filter water pressure (psi)Post transfer pump water pressure (psi)Post post-treatment bag filter water pressure (psi)Sanitary sewer flow rate and totalizer (gallons)Retreatment loop flow rate and totalizer (gallons)Potable water totalizer (gallons)
Table 4ASTP Operational Data (September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico
COMPUTER CONTROL SCREEN READINGSOverview ScreenTreated Water (Injection Well) Flow FIT-3121 GPM 88.3 83.8 87.5Equalization Tank Level PIT-391 FEET 2.6 2.6 2.7Acid Tank Level LIT331 FEET 3.85 2.68 4.3Reinjection Pump Pressure PIT-3101 PSI 40.8 39.8 39.2Pumping Well Level LX-311 FEET 101.1 103.3 105.4Pumping Well Discharge Flow FIT-311 GPM 88.6 83.8 88.5Single Injection Well Pressure PIT-3131 PSI 41.2 39.8 39.7Single Injection Well Level LX-3131 FEET 146.6 147.4 144.8Single Injection Well Flow FIT-3131 GPM 55.1 54.2 54.8Dual Injection Well Pressure PIT-3132 PSI 41.8 40.5 40.4Dual Injection Well Level LX-3132 FEET 106.5 107.2 102.1Dual Injection Well Flow FIT-3132 GPM 46.9 43.0 47.4pH Set point N/A mg/L 5.0 5.0 5.0Equipment Run Times ScreenAcid Feed Pump P-331 HRS 11,468.4 11,779.4 12,070.9Air Stripper Blower P-361 HRS 14,239.9 14,551.1 14,847.8Transfer Pump P-381 HRS 12,053.2 12,364.4 12,657.3Reinjection Pump P-3101 HRS 14,131.0 14,442.2 14,735.1Pumping Well Pump P-311 HRS 11,677.7 11,988.7 12,280.2TotalizersTotal Treated Water Flow (FIT) FIT-3121 GAL 63,520,574 65,098,971 66,575,056Pumping Well Flow (FIT) FIT-311 GAL 65,558,762 67,168,629 68,670,332Single Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3131 GAL 38,978,495 39,978,469 40,925,023Dual Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3132 GAL 16,849,288 17,677,642 18,435,707Dual Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3133 GAL 11,574,184 11,574,184 11,574,184LOCAL EQUIPMENT READINGSSanitary Sewer Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A GAL 1,889,650 1,889,650 1,889,650Water Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A Ft^3 1,394.13 1,394.13 1,400.92Electric Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A kWh 43,035 47,979 52,815Electric Utility Meter - D2EI3/D2EP1 N/A kWh - - - 13,005 15,015Recirculation Totalizer Inside ASTP N/A GAL 1,803,780 1,803,780 1,803,780Pressure Gauge at ASTP Influent N/A PSI 2.5 2.0 2.5Pressure Gauge after Influent Bag Filter N/A PSI 2.2 2.2 2.2Air Stripper Blower Airflow Rate N/A x100 CFM 8.8 9.0 9.0Air Stripper Sump Pressure N/A in-H2O 16.5 15.0 14.0Pressure Gauge after Transfer Pump N/A PSI 2.5 - - - 6.0Pressure Gauge after Treated Water Bag Filter N/A PSI 41.0 39.5 41.0ACID Feed Pump Stroke Length N/A Stroke 74% 72% 71%Notes:ASTP Air Stripper Treatment Plantbgs below ground surfaceft feethrs hoursmg/L milligrams per literkWh kilowatt hourgal gallonμm micrometermL milliliterpsi pounds per square inch
Date & Time
The Pumping Well Flow (FIT 3-1-1) for November 5, 2007 was mis-recorded in the field. The value in this table has been extrapolated in time from the previous and subsequent values.
The Dual Injection Well Upper Tube formerly (3-13-2) has been retired during the recent modifications. Only the Lower Tube (3-13-3) components remain at the "Dual Well" and these have been renamed to 3-13-2.
UnitsEquipment ID
Table 4ASTP Operational Data (September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico
FAP ASTP Inspection Data Log Form
COMPUTER CONTROL SCREEN READINGSOverview ScreenTreated Water (Injection Well) Flow FIT-3121 GPMEqualization Tank Level PIT-391 FEETAcid Tank Level LIT331 FEETReinjection Pump Pressure PIT-3101 PSIPumping Well Level LX-311 FEETPumping Well Discharge Flow FIT-311 GPMSingle Injection Well Pressure PIT-3131 PSISingle Injection Well Level LX-3131 FEETSingle Injection Well Flow FIT-3131 GPMDual Injection Well Pressure PIT-3132 PSIDual Injection Well Level LX-3132 FEETDual Injection Well Flow FIT-3132 GPMpH Set point N/A mg/LEquipment Run Times ScreenAcid Feed Pump P-331 HRSAir Stripper Blower P-361 HRSTransfer Pump P-381 HRSReinjection Pump P-3101 HRSPumping Well Pump P-311 HRSTotalizersTotal Treated Water Flow (FIT) FIT-3121 GALPumping Well Flow (FIT) FIT-311 GALSingle Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3131 GALDual Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3132 GALDual Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3133 GALLOCAL EQUIPMENT READINGSSanitary Sewer Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A GALWater Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A Ft^3Electric Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A kWhElectric Utility Meter - D2EI3/D2EP1 N/A kWhRecirculation Totalizer Inside ASTP N/A GALPressure Gauge at ASTP Influent N/A PSIPressure Gauge after Influent Bag Filter N/A PSIAir Stripper Blower Airflow Rate N/A x100 CFMAir Stripper Sump Pressure N/A in-H2OPressure Gauge after Transfer Pump N/A PSIPressure Gauge after Treated Water Bag Filter N/A PSIACID Feed Pump Stroke Length N/A StrokeNotes:ASTP Air Stripper Treatment Plantbgs below ground surfaceft feethrs hoursmg/L milligrams per literkWh kilowatt hourgal gallonμm micrometermL milliliterpsi pounds per square inch
The Pumping Well Flow (FIT 3-1-1) for November 5, 2007 was mis-recorded in the field. The value in this table has been extrapolated in time from the previous and subsequent values.
The Dual Injection Well Upper Tube formerly (3-13-2) has been retired during the recent modifications. Only the Lower Tube (3-13-3) components remain at the "Dual Well" and these have been renamed to 3-13-2.
Table 4ASTP Operational Data (September 28, 2007 to December 29, 2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico
FAP ASTP Inspection Data Log Form
COMPUTER CONTROL SCREEN READINGSOverview ScreenTreated Water (Injection Well) Flow FIT-3121 GPMEqualization Tank Level PIT-391 FEETAcid Tank Level LIT331 FEETReinjection Pump Pressure PIT-3101 PSIPumping Well Level LX-311 FEETPumping Well Discharge Flow FIT-311 GPMSingle Injection Well Pressure PIT-3131 PSISingle Injection Well Level LX-3131 FEETSingle Injection Well Flow FIT-3131 GPMDual Injection Well Pressure PIT-3132 PSIDual Injection Well Level LX-3132 FEETDual Injection Well Flow FIT-3132 GPMpH Set point N/A mg/LEquipment Run Times ScreenAcid Feed Pump P-331 HRSAir Stripper Blower P-361 HRSTransfer Pump P-381 HRSReinjection Pump P-3101 HRSPumping Well Pump P-311 HRSTotalizersTotal Treated Water Flow (FIT) FIT-3121 GALPumping Well Flow (FIT) FIT-311 GALSingle Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3131 GALDual Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3132 GALDual Injection Well Flow (FIT) FIT-3133 GALLOCAL EQUIPMENT READINGSSanitary Sewer Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A GALWater Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A Ft^3Electric Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A kWhElectric Utility Meter - D2EI3/D2EP1 N/A kWhRecirculation Totalizer Inside ASTP N/A GALPressure Gauge at ASTP Influent N/A PSIPressure Gauge after Influent Bag Filter N/A PSIAir Stripper Blower Airflow Rate N/A x100 CFMAir Stripper Sump Pressure N/A in-H2OPressure Gauge after Transfer Pump N/A PSIPressure Gauge after Treated Water Bag Filter N/A PSIACID Feed Pump Stroke Length N/A StrokeNotes:ASTP Air Stripper Treatment Plantbgs below ground surfaceft feethrs hoursmg/L milligrams per literkWh kilowatt hourgal gallonμm micrometermL milliliterpsi pounds per square inch
The Pumping Well Flow (FIT 3-1-1) for November 5, 2007 was mis-recorded in the field. The value in this table has been extrapolated in time from the previous and subsequent values.
The Dual Injection Well Upper Tube formerly (3-13-2) has been retired during the recent modifications. Only the Lower Tube (3-13-3) components remain at the "Dual Well" and these have been renamed to 3-13-2.
Notes: (a) Dual Injection Well Lower Flow is no longer monitored separately from the Upper Flow.
Table 7Summary Analytical Results From Recent Influent and Effluent Water Sampling (2007)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site Albuquerque, New Mexico
Date
cis-1,2-Dichloro-
ethene Q
trans-1,2-Dichloro-
ethene QTrichloro-
ethene QJan/Feb 2007Samples not collected for the February 2007 report,due to system shut down.Feb/March 2007FAP SP-1 A07 N Influent 2/19/07 4.2 1.6 12.1FAP SP-1 B07 N Influent 2/20/07 4.2 1.5 12.0FAP SP-1 B07 Dup QA/QC Influent 2/20/07 4.3 1.5 12.0FAP SP-1 C07 N Influent 2/20/07 4.1 1.4 12.0FAP SP-1 C07 Dup QA/QC Influent 2/20/07 4.2 1.5 12.3FAP SP-5 A07 N Effluent 2/19/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UFAP SP-5 B07 N Effluent 2/20/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UFAP SP-5 C07 N Effluent 2/20/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UJune 2007FAP SP-1 070602 N Influent 6/2/07 4.1 1.5 10.2FAP SP-1 070602-DUP QA/QC Influent 6/2/07 4.2 1.3 9.9FAP SP-5 070602 N Effluent 6/2/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UAugust 2007FAP SP-1 070823 N Influent 8/23/07 4.1 1.5 10FAP SP-5 070823-DUP QA/QC Influent 8/23/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UFAP SP-5 070823 N Effluent 8/23/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 UOctober 2007FAP SP-1 071029 N Influent 10/28/07 4.4 1.5 11.4FAP SP-1 071029-DUP QA/QC Influent 10/28/07 4.4 1.6 11.1FAP SP-5 071029 N Effluent 10/28/07 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U
Notes: Data Qualifier (Q): a Sample taken from sample port at ASTP influent line (SP1) U - the analyte was not detected b Sample taken from sample port after Air Stripper (SP3) B - the analyte was detected in an c Sample taken from sample port after treated water bag filter (SP5) associated blank d Sample taken from sample port after influent bag filter (SP2) Shaded cells indicate detected analytes J - the analyte was positively identified, N - normal sample but the quantitation is an estimation µg/L - micrograms per literOnly analytical results for COC's are included in this table.
Analyses included in this report:Metals ICP 200.7 (Fe) VOA CLP Low Level (0.5)
Report Narrative
Sample Management:
This report contains the VOA and Iron data only. The Ammonia, BOD, and Kjeldahl are parameters done by the TCEQ Houston Lab. The TCEQ data will be reported as soon as it is available.
VOA:
Two analytes fail high in the BS. Neither analyte was found in the associated samples.
Acetone is qualified as blank related in samples 0710047-06 and 0710047-07 due to the presence of this analyte in the associated analysis blank.
Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and matrix interference.
Standard procedures for quality assurance and quality control were followed in the analysis andreporting of the sample results. The results apply only to the samples tested. This final reportshould only be reproduced in full.
Richard McMillinRegion 6 Laboratory Branch ChiefDavid Neleigh
Report Approvals:
Region 6 Laboratory Manager
Comments:
Received by and Date__________________________________________________/_____/_______
Please sign and date this form below and return it with any comments to:
Please have the U.S. EPA Project Manager/Officer call the Data Management Coordinator at 3-2137 for any comments or questions.
Date Transmitted: _____/_____/_______
/ /Data Management Coordinator: Christy Warren
Houston, Texas 77099
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 6 Environmental Services Branch Laboratory10625 Fallstone Road
Data Management Coordinator Signature Date
The laboratory routinely disposes of samples 90 days after all analyses have been completed. If you have a need to hold these samples in custody longer than 90 days, please sign below.
____________________________________________ ___________________Signature Date
Please provide a reason for holding:
Sample Receipt and Disposal
Project Number: 08SF032Site Name: Fruit Avenue Plume
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 6 Laboratory10625 Fallstone Road, Houston, TX 77099
Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248
Station ID Laboratory ID Sample Type Date Collected
Page 19 of 25Report Name: 0710047 FINAL 12 05 07 0722
Env
iron
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y
Reg
ion
6 L
abor
ator
y10
625
Falls
tone
Roa
d, H
oust
on, T
X 7
7099
Phon
e:(2
81)9
83-2
100
Fax:
(281
)983
-224
8
Page
20
of 2
5R
epor
t Nam
e: 0
7100
47 F
INA
L 12
05
07 0
722
Env
iron
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y
Reg
ion
6 L
abor
ator
y10
625
Falls
tone
Roa
d, H
oust
on, T
X 7
7099
Phon
e:(2
81)9
83-2
100
Fax:
(281
)983
-224
8
Page
21
of 2
5R
epor
t Nam
e: 0
7100
47 F
INA
L 12
05
07 0
722
Env
iron
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y
Reg
ion
6 L
abor
ator
y10
625
Falls
tone
Roa
d, H
oust
on, T
X 7
7099
Phon
e:(2
81)9
83-2
100
Fax:
(281
)983
-224
8
Page
22
of 2
5R
epor
t Nam
e: 0
7100
47 F
INA
L 12
05
07 0
722
Env
iron
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y
Reg
ion
6 L
abor
ator
y10
625
Falls
tone
Roa
d, H
oust
on, T
X 7
7099
Phon
e:(2
81)9
83-2
100
Fax:
(281
)983
-224
8
Page
23
of 2
5R
epor
t Nam
e: 0
7100
47 F
INA
L 12
05
07 0
722
Env
iron
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n A
genc
y
Reg
ion
6 L
abor
ator
y10
625
Falls
tone
Roa
d, H
oust
on, T
X 7
7099
Phon
e:(2
81)9
83-2
100
Fax:
(281
)983
-224
8
Page
24
of 2
5R
epor
t Nam
e: 0
7100
47 F
INA
L 12
05
07 0
722
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 6 Laboratory10625 Fallstone Road, Houston, TX 77099
Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248
Notes and Definitions
B Blank Related - The concentration found in the sample was less than 10X the concentration found in the associated extraction, digestion and/or analysis blank. Presence in the sample is therefore suspect.
A This sample was extracted at a single acid pH.
HTS Sample was prepared and/or analyzed past recommended holding time. Concentrations should be considered minimum values.
AES Atomic Emission Spectrometer
CVAA Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption
ECD Electron Capture Detector
GC Gas Chromatograph
GFAA Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption
ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma
MS Mass Spectrometer
NA Not Applicable
NPD Nitrogen Phosphorous Detector
NR Not Reported
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
U Undetected
# Out of QC limits
Initial pressure in air analyses is the pressure at which the canister was received in psia (pounds per square inch absolute pressure).
The pH reported for Volatile liquid samples was tested using a 0-14 pH indicator strip for the purpose of verifying chemical preservation.
The statistical software used for the reporting of toxicity data is ToxStat 3.5,Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming 1996.
Page 25 of 25Report Name: 0710047 FINAL 12 05 07 0722
Attachment D
COC Recovery Calculations
Reporting Period Date
Extraction Well Totalizer
(gal)Begin September 28, 2007 65,558,762Mid October 26, 2007 68,670,332Mid November 30, 2007 72,919,553End December 29, 2007 76,424,039
Sample Location Sample ID Sample Date TCE cDCE tDCE UnitsInfluent water FAP SP-1 071029 10/29/2007 11.4 4.4 1.5 µg/LEffluent water FAP SP-5 071029 10/29/2007 0.25 0.25 0.25 µg/L
Contaminant concentrations are the detected concentration or 1/2 of the MDL which ever is greater.
cDCE tDCECI = 11.4 µg/L = Average Concentration in SP-1 (influent) Water Sample 4.40 1.50CE = 0.25 µg/L = Average Concentration in SP-5 (Effluent) Water Sample 0.25 0.25ΔC = 11.15 µg/L = Concentration Removed 4.15 1.25V2 = 68,670,332 Gallons = Final Extraction Well Totalizer ReadingV1 = 65,558,762 Gallons = Initial Extraction Well Totalizer ReadingΔV = 3.11E+06 Gallons = Volume of Ground Water TreatedΔV = 1.18E+07 Liters = Volume of Ground Water Treated this Period 1.18E+07 1.18E+07