Classroom Support and Professional Competence of Inclusive Education Teachers: Lessons from ‘Learning in Regular Classrooms’ 随随随随随 () in Beijing Presented at Shaanxi Normal University, April 2015 Dr. Michael Mu ([email protected]) Vice-Chancellor’s Research Fellow Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology Dr. Yan Wang ([email protected]) Professor Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University
18
Embed
Classroom Support and Professional Competence of Inclusive Education Teachers: Lessons from ‘Learning in Regular Classrooms’ (随班就读) in Beijing Presented.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Classroom Support and Professional Competence of Inclusive Education Teachers: Lessons from ‘Learning in Regular Classrooms’ (随班就读) in
Beijing
Presented at Shaanxi Normal University, April 2015
Dr. Michael Mu ([email protected])Vice-Chancellor’s Research FellowFaculty of Education, Queensland University of TechnologyDr. Yan Wang ([email protected])ProfessorFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University
• The traditional medical deficit modelcure the diseases, correct the abnormalities, and fix the problems associated with ‘disabled’ children
• The Salamanca Statement“enrolling all children in regular schools unless there are compelling reasons for doing otherwise” (UNESCO, 1994, p.44)
• The current social inclusive modelInclusive education addresses the belongingness, nurture, and education of all students across the whole education spectrum regardless of their differences in aptitude, gender, class, language, religion, culture, and race.
The Chinese context• Before the 1980s – segregation• Since the 1980s and onwards – Learning in Regular Classrooms (LRC 随班就读 )
• 83 million people with disabilities• 2.5 million school-aged children with disabilities, including 1.6 million children
with autism
Three questions:1. What is the required professional
competence of LRC teachers?2. What is the preferred classroom support to
LRC practices?3. What is the relationship between
professional competence and classroom support?
Professional competence of inclusive education teachers:The Western literature
• Teachers’ attitudes towards their colleagues, students with disabilities, the concept/practice of inclusion, and working collaboratively; as well as attitudes towards their job preparedness, their roles in inclusive education programs, and the impact of such programs on students with disabilities
• Skills: collaborative teaching, curricular and instructional modifications and accommodations, application and evaluation of individualised education programs (IEP), classroom management and organisation, personal support, assistive technology, positive behavioural support, and literacy instruction
• Knowledge: content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, knowledge of each student, specialised knowledge, and context knowledge
Our approach: An exploratory sequential mixed methods design
The initial qualitative phase
First stage: Two one-hour long focus groups with:• Five teachers in a primary school in Chaoyang district• Ten teachers in a junior high school in Haidian district
Second stage: One-hour long individual interviews with:• Two teachers in the Chaoyang school: one with considerable LRC
experience and one with some LRC experience• One teacher in the Haidian school – a novice teacher• Two officials in the local education departments
Focus group data• Positive attitudes, necessary knowledge, and key skills• The fourth dimension of professional competence emerged.
Every individual teacher will have problems and questions when practicing LRC. This pushes us to actively seek support, for example, support from professionals, leaders, and resource teachers.
LRC requires various support. We have to try our best to look for support from leaders, parents, and communities. Teachers’ ability of acquiring support is fairly important.
Findings from the initial qualitative phase (to be continued)
Individual interview dataIt is of particular importance for in-service teachers to ask for advice and look for resources to support their LRC practices…‘To do’ differs so much from ‘to wait’, resulting in completely different outcomes. If teachers want to achieve better outcomes, they can’t wait for help. Instead, they have to be very active at looking for support.
There are different sources of support. Sometimes it (the support) comes from our school but mostly it is our personal choice…The school only offers support at the policy level so I have to look for substantial support. I have to study by myself, like look for online resources and read more documents and materials.
Currently, the support system is not good enough. Few resources are ready to be used. Teachers have to be the subject and the master of this job. It’s like when you are hungry, get out of the house looking for food rather than wait to be fed. When there is short of food, nobody is going to feed you. Look for something to eat!
Findings from the initial qualitative phase(to be continued)
Agency entails “a teacher’s commitment to governing his or her professional practice” according to deeply held epistemology of teaching and learning (Campbell, 2012, p. 184) and teachers’ capacity to “critically shape their own responsiveness to problematic situations” (Emirbayer & Mische, 1998, p. 971).
The subsequent quantitative phase
• Convenience sampling• 1,761 participants• 1,703 valid cases• 7 districts• 272 local schools• 84% female• 66% from primary schools• 41% less than three years of LRC
experience• 74% no in-service training for LRC practices
Results of the subsequent quantitative study
820 for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)• Principal Component Analysis (Hotelling, 1933; Pearson,
1901)• Kaiser’s eigenvalue-above-one criterion (Kaiser, 1960)• Cattell’s scree test of inflexion point (Cattell, 1966)• Horn’s parallel analysis (Horn, 1965; O’Connor, 2000)
t = -29.51, p < .001, r = .70• Knowledge (M = 3.47)
t = -13.60, p < .001, r = .42)• Skills (M = 4.03)
t = -33.49, p < .001, r = .75)
The five dimension model of classroom support
Reliability of the model (Cronbach’s α)• Overall (26 items) = .94• Physical support (8 items) = .90• Specialist support (4 items) = .91• Peer support (2 items) = .84• Institutional support (4 items) = .87• Cultural support (8 items) = .90
Comparative analysis• The strength of cultural support was
statistically stronger than that of all other support dimensions.
• The strength of specialist support was statistically weaker than that of all other support dimensions.
• The strength of physical support was also statistically lower than that of institutional support and peer support.
• There was no statistical difference between the strength of institutional support and that of peer support.
Model comparison
Model 1: χ2 = 10545.07, df = 1367
Model 2: χ2 = 10265.38, df = 1366 Model change: ∆χ2 = 279.69, ∆df = 1, p < .001
Our publications
Mu, G. M., & Wang, Y. (2015/in press). An enquiry into the professional competence of inclusive education teachers in Beijing: Attitudes, knowledge, skills, and agency. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 62(6).
Wang, Y., & Mu, G. M. (2015/in press). Multi-dimensional classroom support to inclusive education teachers in Beijing, China. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 62(6).
Wang, Y., & Mu, G. M. (2014). Revisiting the trajectories of special teacher education in China through policy and practice. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 61(4), 346-361.