Top Banner
CLASSICAL HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA: TREATMENT STRATEGIES DR ANKIT RAIYANI Dept. of haematology SSH, Pune.
26

Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Feb 16, 2017

Download

Healthcare

Ankit Raiyani
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

CLASSICAL HODGKIN’S LYMPHOMA:

TREATMENT STRATEGIESDR ANKIT RAIYANI

Dept. of haematologySSH, Pune.

Page 2: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION• Staging & risk stratification• Role of PET scan• Treatment protocols (First line and second line)• ABVD protocol and its modifications• BEACOPP and its modifications• Newer agents

• Treatment of newly diagnosed HL• Early stage (Stage I/II) favourable risk• Early stage unfavourable risk• Advanced stage disease• Elderly (> 60 yr) newly diagnosed HL

• Treatment of refractory/relapseed HL

Page 3: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

ANN ARBOR CLINICAL STAGING

Page 4: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

RISK STRATIFICATION

Hasenclever D, et al. NEJM, 1998

Page 5: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

ROLE OF PET SCAN• 97- 100 % HL are FDG avid• Preferable to CT for initial staging • will upstage a minority of patients and aid the interpretation of subsequent PET scan

• PET response should be reported according to Deauville criteria• 1, 2 should be considered ‘negative’ • 4, 5 considered ‘positive’• Deauville score 3 should be interpreted according to the clinical context but in many HL patients indicates

a good prognosis with standard treatment.• Interim PET scan at end of 2 cycles of chemotherapy has greatest prognostic value• Even overrules the initial IPS risk stratification• Can guide in escalation or de-escalation of further treatment

• End-of-treatment PET scan positivity: • Biopsy is advised prior to second-line therapy to confirm residual disease with score 4,5 to exclude false

positive uptake with FDG.

Page 6: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Page 7: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

TREATMENT PROTOCOLS

Page 8: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

First line protocols

• ABVD (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastin, Dacarbazine) ± ISRT• Stanford 5 (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastin, Vincristine, Meclorethamine, Etoposide,

Prednisone)• BEACOPP (Bleomycin, Etoposide, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine,

Procarbazine, Prednisone)•

Second line protocols ± HDT/ASCR

Page 9: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

NEWER AGENTS• Brentuximab vedotin• Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed to the protein CD30• Approved for relapsed HL• Potential uses: B-AVD, post ASCT single drug maintenance, single agent

palliation in elderly frail patients• Adverse effects: peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia• Nivolumab• Humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody used to treat cancer.• Works as a checkpoint inhibitor, blocking a signal that would have

prevented activated T cells from attacking the cancer, thus allowing the immune system to clear the cancer

Page 10: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

ABVD PROTOCOL

Page 11: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

MODIFICATION OF ABVD PROTOCOL

Page 12: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

STUDY OUTCOMEABVD AVD ABV AV

Number of

patients566 571 198 167

FFTF @ 5 years 93% 89% 81% 77%

Gr III/IV toxicity 33% 26% 28% 26%

Upfront dose reduction not recommended for treatment of cHL with ABVD

Page 13: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Page 14: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

OUTCOME

Page 15: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

ADVERSE EVENTS

Page 16: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

BEACOPP & ESCALATED BEACOPP (NEJM 2003)

Page 17: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

DISADVANTAGES OF BEACOPP VS ABVD• Very high rates of severe adverse events• Very high cost of treatment• No benefit in 5 yr OS as compared to ABVD• Reported PFS, OS rates may be difficult to replicate in India• Benefit in FFTF is balanced by acceptable RR of 2nd line

protocol + HDT/ASCR

Page 18: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Page 19: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

TREATMENT OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED HL• Early stage (Stage I/II) favourable risk• Early stage unfavourable risk• Advanced stage disease

Page 20: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

EARLY STAGE (STAGE I/II) FAVOURABLE RISK

ABVD X 2 cycles

Interim PET scan

Deauville 1-4 ISRT: 20 Gy

Deauville 5 Biopsy

Negative: ISRT 20 GyPositive: treat as

refractory disease

Page 21: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

EARLY STAGE (I/II) UNFAVOURABLE RISK

ABVD X 4 cycles

Restage with PET scan

Deauville 1-3

ABVD X 2 cycles

AVD X 2 cycles

ISRT: 30 Gy

Deauville 4 ABVD X 2 cycles

Restage with PET scan

Deauville 5 Biopsy

Negative: ABVD X 2

cycles AND ISRT 30 - 45

GyPositive: treat as

refractory disease

Page 22: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

ADVANCED STAGE (III/IV) DISEASE

ABVD X 2 cycles

Restage with PET

scan

Deauville 1-3

AVD X 4 cycles

Deauville 4, 5

ABVD X 4 cycles

Restage with PET

scan

Deauville 1-3

Observe or ISRT

Deauville 4ISRT to PET

positive sites

Deauville 5 Biopsy

Negative: Observe or

ISRT (30 - 45 Gy)

Positive: treat as

refractory disease

Page 23: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

ELDERLY (> 60 YR) NEWLY DIAGNOSED HL

Non-Frail (No comorbiditie

s)

A(B)VD X 2 cycles Interim PET

Negative (1-3)

AVD X 4 cycles

Positive (4-5)Change

protocol (2nd line/

palliative)VEPEMB X 6 cycles ± ISRT

PVAG X 6 cycles ± ISRT

Frail ( Co morbiditi

es)

ChlVPPVEPEMB

Brentuximab

ISRTPalliation

Page 24: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY/RELAPSE (<1 YR) HL

Biopsy proven disease

2nd line therapy PET scan

Deauville 1-4

HDT/ASCR if eligible

Brentuximab maintenanc

e X 1 yr

ISRT/ Observe

Allogeneic SCT

Deauville 5ISRT/

Additional systemic therapy*

Allogeneic SCT

* Brentuximab, Bendamustine

Page 25: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN RELAPSED CLASSICAL HL

Page 26: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

THANK YOU!!