Top Banner
Civil Liberties and Public Policy Chapter 4 .
28

Civil Liberties and Public Policy

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

Civil Liberties and Public Policy. Chapter 4. American Civil Liberties. Granted by the Bill of Rights Their final interpreter of the content and scope is the US Supreme Court. The Bill of Rights. Civil Liberties: the legal constitutional protections against the government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Civil Liberties and Public Policy

Chapter 4

.

Page 2: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

American Civil LibertiesO Granted by the Bill of Rights

O Their final interpreter of the content and scope is the US Supreme Court.

Page 3: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

The Bill of RightsO Civil Liberties: the legal

constitutional protections against the government

O Adopted primarily in response to British abuses of the colonists’ civil liberties

Page 4: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

The Bill of Rights Cont’dO Barron v. Baltimore (1883) – SC ruled

that the Bill of rights restrained only the national government, not the states and cities. Also maintained that that the Bill of Rights intended to prevent the US Government from granting titles to royalty

O Gitlow v. New York (1925) – The SC began to rule that the Bill of Rights applied directly to the states, as to the national government.

Page 5: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

First AmendmentOContains the great freedoms of

speech, press, religion and assembly

OIt’s language, “Congress shall make no law,” suggests that the Bill of Rights, as written, did not apply to the state governments and was written to restrict the powers of the national government.

Page 6: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Freedom of ReligionO Stated that abridgement of citizens’

freedom to worship or not to worship as they please is prohibited.

O SC has ruled that while all religious beliefs are constitutionally protected, all religious practices are not.

Page 7: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of religion

O Engle v. Vitale (1962) – SC ruled that prayers done as classroom exercises in public schools was (were) unconstitutional

O School District of Abington Township, PA v. Schempp (1963) – SC ruled that a PA law requiring Bible readings in schools violated the 1st amendment.

Page 8: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of religion

O Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) – SC ruled that aid to church-related schools must be for secular purposes only, and cannot be used to advance or inhibit religion

O Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) – SC ruled that freedom of religious practice was more important than the right of the government to interfere in deciding in favor of the right of Amish parents to take their children out of public school after 8th grade.

Page 9: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of religion

O The SC has prohibited prayer and recitation of Bible verses in public schools when done as part of classroom exercises and posting of the 10 commandments on the walls of public classrooms.

O The displaying of Christmas nativity scenes and Hanukkah menorahs on public property was declared unconstitutional.

Page 10: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of Press

O Near v. Minnesota (1931) – SC ruled that a newspaper, no matter what how outrageous its opinions, must be allowed to publish without prior restraint. (the act by which government prevents material from being published.)

O NY Times v Sullivan (1964) – SC ruled that statements made about political figures are libelous only if made with malice and reckless regard for the truth.

Page 11: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of Press

O Miller v. California (1973) – SC clarified its doctrine of what was obscene, including such gauges as whether material appealed to merely a prurient interest in sex, and whether it lacked serious artistic, literary, political or scientific intent.O Stated that local communities

should have more responsibility over deciding what constitutes obscenity.

Page 12: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of Press

O At the urging of feminists and conservative Christians, some cities have banned pornography on the grounds it dehumanizes and endangers women. The courts have struck these down as violations of the First Amendment.

O Jacksonville, FL asserted a ban on all films containing nudity, and prohibited them from being shown in drive-in theaters, the SC ruled that all nudity may not be deemed obscene and overturned the ban.

Page 13: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on Freedom of Press

O Zurcher v. Stanford Daily (1978) – Held that a search warrant could be applied to a newspaper, as with anyone else, without violating the First Amendment.

O Red Lion Broadcasting v. FCC (1996) – the SC upheld restrictions on radio and TV broadcasting requiring time for political candidates and justified restrictions on their broadcasting on the basis of the fact that there are only a limited number of radio frequencies available.

Page 14: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Second AmendmentO Provides for the right to bear

arms

Page 15: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Fourth AmendmentO Outlaws unreasonable search

and seizure – Obtaining evidence in a haphazard or random manner.

O Search warrant – A written authorization from a court specifying the area to be searched and what the police are searching for.

Page 16: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on the Fourth Amendment

O Mapp v. Ohio (1961) – SC ruled that the protection against unreasonable search and seizure applied to state and local governments, as well as the national government, thus nationalizing the exclusionary rule.

O Jacobson v. United States (1992) – Defined 4th Amendment protections to included protection from entrapment.

Page 17: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on the Fourth Amendment

O Hamdam v. Rumsfeld (2006) – SC ruled that procedures for trying prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, were insufficient for ensuring a fair trial.

Page 18: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Right to PrivacyO The right to a private personal

life free from intrusion from the government.

O Although not clearly stated has been ruled to be implied by the 4th Amendment.

Page 19: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Fifth AmendmentO Deals with grand juries, double

jeopardy, forbidding self-incriminating, due process, and eminent domain.

Page 20: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on the 5th Amendment

O Miranda v. Arizona (1966) – Police must inform any suspect of a series of rights, including the constitutional right to remain silent.

O 1991 – SC Ruled that a coerced confession introduced during a trial does not automatically taint a conviction if it is a “harmless error” and is an example of the Court’s recent willingness to make exceptions to the requirements.

Page 21: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Sixth AmendmentO Deals with criminal court

procedures

Page 22: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC rulings on 6th Amendment

O Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) – extended the right to counsel to everyone accused of a felony.

Page 23: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Seventh AmendmentO Deals with eminent domain

Page 24: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

Eighth AmendmentO Forbids excessive bail and cruel

and unusual punishment.

Page 25: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

14th AmendmentO Due Process Clause - The part of

the 14th Amendment guaranteeing that persons cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property by the US or state governments without due process of law.

Page 26: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC Rulings on the 14th Amendment

O Roe v. Wade (1973) – SC has generally moved to allow more states to allow more room to regulate abortions (e.g. waiting periods) than was true in Roe. O Also ruled that in the third

trimester of pregnancy that states can ban abortion except when mother’s health is in danger.

Page 27: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

SC Rulings on the 14th Amendment

O Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) – SC ruled that abortion restrictions could be imposed by states if they did not involve “undue burdens” on the women.

Page 28: Civil Liberties and  Public  Policy

USA Patriot ActO Allowed agents to monitor political or

religious groups without connections to a criminal investigation.

O Granted powers to examine a terrorist suspect’s records held by doctors, libraries, and universities.

O Faced restrictions on domestic spying in counterterrorism operations.