1 CITY OF ORINDA Road and Drainage Repairs Plan (As Updated in 2017) February 6, 2018 (ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 17, 2012 UPDATED APRIL 22, 2014 AND MARCH 15, 2016) G.7.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Road and Drainage Repairs Plan Updated 2-6-18 (1412 : CIOC Road and Drainage Plan approval)
64
Embed
CITY OF ORINDA - media.virbcdn.commedia.virbcdn.com/files/ea/11436f073f176eda-Roads... · CITY OF ORINDA Road and Drainage Repairs Plan (As Updated in 2017) February 6, 2018 (ORIGINALLY
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
CITY OF ORINDA
Road and Drainage Repairs Plan
(As Updated in 2017)
February 6, 2018
(ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 17, 2012 UPDATED APRIL 22, 2014 AND MARCH 15, 2016)
LARRY THEIS, Director of Public Works and Engineering Services FARAH KHORASHADI, Paving Program Project Manager
and
CITIZENS’ INFRASTRUCTURE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION Terry Murphy, Chair
Robert Hubner Vice‐Chair Walter Bell
Gordon Bizieff Jud Hammon
Bill Hurrell Richard Nelson
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 96
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
1
CITY OF ORINDA ROAD AND DRAINAGE REPAIRS PLAN
(As Updated in 2017) Approved February 6, 2018 by the Orinda City Council
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Orinda incorporated in 1985, and took over approximately 93 miles of paved
publicly owned roads1 and roughly 19 miles of storm drain pipes and culverts from Contra
Costa County at that time. The City’s General‐Fund operating budget, funded in great part
by property taxes, sales taxes, and fees, was not sufficient to maintain all of the roads and
drains in good condition.
With available funds, primarily Gas Tax and Contra Costa County Sales Tax Return‐to‐
Source and grant funds, the City was able to repair and maintain the most heavily‐travelled
roads (arterials, collectors, and school routes) in a generally good condition. However, by
2012, many of the less‐traveled "residential" roads were in poor condition. At this point, a
key issue was to fund repairs of these remaining roads, here called the Residential roads,
and their associated storm drains.
In July, 2012, a ten‐year, multi‐phase funding plan was approved by the City Council, to
address this problem and to assist in managing the associated repair projects. The total
cost for repairs was estimated to be $58.4 Million. The Plan was subsequently revised in
2014 and 2016, and is further updated in this document. In the 2016 revision, an
additional funding phase was introduced to address key storm drain issues that had not yet
been addressed and to complete repairs of the arterials, collectors, and school routes.
The objectives of the March, 2016 plan, which remain the same in this revision, are to
improve the citywide average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to over 70 (Good to Very
Good condition) by the end of the original ten‐year period (2021), to assure that no public
road will have a Pavement Condition index of less than 50 at that time, to dramatically
reduce the risk of new major storm‐drain failures, and to have sufficient annual revenues
to maintain the public road and storm‐drain systems in that condition thereafter.
1 There are also approximately 23 miles of privately‐owned roads within the city of Orinda, as well as important storm drains that are privately owned. This document addresses only those roads and storm drains that are publicly owned.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 97
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
2
Real progress on improving the residential roads began in 2013, with public support
resulting in the approval by voters of a half‐cent sales tax in November, 2012. The first
revenues from this funding source, targeted for repair of Residential streets and drains,
were available in April, 2013.
In 2014, voters approved additional funds for repairs of residential roads and drains, a
general‐obligation bond (Measure J) for $20 Million, followed by the subsequent passage
of the 2016 Bond Measure L ($25 Million). The availability of this level of funding has
allowed the city to significantly accelerate repair of our Residential roads and associated
drains. This acceleration will shorten the duration of our disruptive road‐repair projects,
with completion of repairs of residential roads now expected in 2019. The shortened
duration of the repair project is expected to reduce costs, through the use of larger‐scale
contracts, and the ability to take advantage of low oil prices, a main factor in the cost of
the asphalt required to pave the roads.
It is clear that dramatic progress has been made in repairing the city's roads and storm
drains. At the time this report is being written, the 2017 paving project is nearing
completion. Table 1 shows the lengths, in miles, of Residential and Arterial / Collector /
School Route roads repaired from 2012 through 2019, including repairs projected for the
2018 and 2019 repair projects. Figure 1 shows the historical PCI data, from 2011 through
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 98
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
3
the end of 2016, and the projected improvement through 2019. As can be seen in the
chart, the average PCI of our public roads is projected to be nearly 70 by the end of the
2017 paving project. Based on the current projections, the City is anticipating
rehabilitating all Residential roads by the end of 2019, after which, the system‐wide
average PCI will be nearly 90. This will be considered one of the best overall ratings in the
entire Bay Area.
Year Residential
Street/School Route Miles of Rehabilitation
Arterial/Collector/ School Route
Miles of rehabilitation
2012 0.66 1.77
2013
2014 0.94 3.86
2015 6.85 2.24
2016 8.50 0.73
2017 10.46 0.36
2018 13.74 1.34
2019 25.41 1.48
Miles repaired: Sub‐Totals
66.6 11.8
Total Miles Orinda Roads Repaired
78.3
Table 1. Lengths of Residential and Arterial/Collector/School Route roads repaired from
2012, by year, including projected repairs, through 2019
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 99
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
4
Figure 1: Pavement Condition Index; 2011 through 2016 and projected to 2019
The map of Figure 4 also shows the progression ‐ and acceleration ‐ of the repair project,
with yellow highlights showing those roads repaired from 2012 through 2016, red
highlights showing those being repaired during the 2017 project, and blue highlights
showing those scheduled to be repaired in 2018 and 2019.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 100
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
5
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 101
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
7
Completion of repairs of the residential roads, however, does not complete the overall
project of repairing all of our public roads and associated storm drains. Important repairs
of Arterials, Collectors, and School Routes will remain, and the sinkhole on Miner Road
clearly shows the necessity to emphasize storm drain rehabilitation work as quickly as
possible.
Additional funding will be required to rehabilitate these remaining Arterial, Collector, and
School‐Route roads, and to accomplish key drainage repairs. This update to the Roads
and Drainage Repairs Plan retains the recommendation for Phase 4 funding of the March,
2016 update, with the same estimated budget of $22 Million. Preliminary descriptions of
the road and drainage system repairs proposed within this budget are summarized in
Attachments 7 and 8.
Furthermore, our roads will not stay in good condition without maintenance. The plan
describes the need for an on‐going funding stream (Phase 5 Funding), to be available after
the completion of the present repairs projects, to provide this ongoing maintenance of our
roads. As shown in Table 2, the cost to maintain our public roads at an average PCI of 70
or greater, with no road having a PCI falling below 50, and to provide routine maintenance
for the associated storm drains, is estimated to be approximately $3.5 Million per year.
Additional funding sources will be required to accomplish this goal.
Maintaining the roads in good condition will significantly reduce Orinda's long‐term costs
for roads in the future. Extensive research shows that, for each dollar it would cost to
treat a roadway with a PCI of 60 or higher, it would cost approximately $5 dollars to repair
the roadway, once it has deteriorated to the point where major rehabilitation or
reconstruction is necessary, as shown in Figure 5.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 102
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
8
Figure 5: Pavement Life Cycle (Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission)
Table 2 – Multi‐Phase Approach to Fund Orinda’s Roads and Drainage Repairs
Phase 1 Approved 2012
2012 ‐
2021
Funded through 2022, with annual increments Half‐Cent Sales Tax (Measure L)with a 10‐Year Sunset
Appropriated Annually by the City Council
Phase 2 Approved 2014
2014 Fully Funded
$20 Million General Obligation Bond (Measure J) for Residential Roads repairs
Phase 3 Approved 2016
2016 Fully Funded
$25 Million General Obligation Bond (Bond Measure L) for Residential Roads repairs
Phase 4 2020 Approximately $22 Million of new revenue for primarily for
repairs of arterials, collectors, school routes and storm drains, to be raised by a Bond, Parcel Tax, or other new source
Phase 5 2020
Approximately $1 Million per year for maintenance of Arterials, Collectors and Bus Routes
and
Approximately $2.5 Million per year for maintenance of Residential Roads
(Extension of the Half‐Cent Sales Tax plus approximately 1.5 Million per year from other Revenue Sources)
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 103
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
9
Summary
To summarize, excellent progress has been made, significantly improving the pavement
quality of Orinda's roads, and reducing the risk of failures of our storm drains. However,
there is a remaining need for funds to complete the repairs of our most‐frequently‐used
roads and to repair some critical storm drains (Phase 4 funding, as shown in Table 2), and
to support maintenance of our roads and storm drains in the long term (Phase 5 funding,
as shown in Table 2).
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 104
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
10
BACKGROUND
In 1985, the newly‐incorporated City of Orinda inherited approximately 93 miles of paved,
publicly owned roads [26 miles of arterials and collectors, plus 67 miles of public
residential roads and bus routes] from Contra Costa County. The city also includes about
100,000 linear feet (about 19 miles) of storm drain pipes and culverts.
Unfortunately, Orinda's available funds going forward were not sufficient to address all of
the maintenance and repair needs for the new city's roads and drains. Within the existing
budget, the city was able to spend an average of $2.3 million per year on street
maintenance and repairs. Approximately $0.8 million annually was drawn from the City’s
General Fund and the Garbage Franchise Fees and used for routine street maintenance
(potholes, striping, sweeping, drainage, etc.). Approximately $1.5 million annually was
made available for pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction, drawn from dedicated
sources of funds ‐‐ Gas Tax, the countywide transportation sales tax Return‐to‐Source
funds, and grant revenues from county and federal sources averaged over the 10‐year
period.
Development of Detailed Roads and Storm Drains Plans
In October, 2004, the City Council created the Citizen's Infrastructure Committee, with a
two‐year charter to assess the status of the city's roads and storm drains and quantify the
funding requirements for repairs and maintenance.
In July, 2006, this group submitted a report with a detailed analysis of the city's
infrastructure. The committee projected the 20‐year cost of repairing all publicly owned
roads in Orinda to be approximately $ 72million, and estimated cost to repair all of the
city's drains to be approximately13 Million. They also analyzed a reduced‐scope effort,
limiting repairs to the most frequently‐used roads (at least 500 average daily trips) and
only the most critical drains. They estimated that this more limited effort would still
require approximately $60 Million.
Based on this assessment, a series of funding measures was put on the ballot, beginning
with a $69.1 Million bond measure in 2006. This bond measure failed to receive the
number of votes required for approval. A subsequent $58.6 Million bond measure in 2007
also did not receive sufficient support.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 105
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
11
In 2007, the City Council formed a new advisory group, the Citizens Infrastructure
Oversight Commission [CIOC]. The charter of the new commission was to provide
oversight of spending on Orinda’s roads, to continue analysis of the nature and extent of
the problem, including funding requirements, and to provide recommendations on how
funds made available for road and drain repairs should best be allocated.
Considering budget limitations, the City Council, on the recommendation of the CIOC,
decided in 2009 to focus repairs on the most‐travelled roads; the arterials, collectors and
bus routes. The available funds (primarily gas tax, Return‐To‐Source funds from the
County sales tax, and federal, state, and regional grants) were focused on repairs of the
city's most heavily travelled roads. As a result, the condition of these roads began to
improve. However, the condition of the city's residential roads continued to decline.
In July 2012, the CIOC and city staff developed a 10 Year Plan that estimated the cost to
repair the city's public roads and the associated storm drains to be approximately $58
million. Implementation of the plan required a series of funding measures anticipated to
be accomplished over four phases, projecting completion of the repairs in 2022.
The first funding phase was funded through the passage in 2012 of Measure L, a one‐half
cent sales tax increase that provides approximately $1 million each year. The second and
third funding phases were funded through the passage in 2014 of Bond Measure J ($20
Million) and the passage in 2016 of Bond Measure L ($25 Million). These three measures,
combined, allow the City to raise $10 Million (over 10 years) from the sales‐tax measure,
plus $45 million through the two general‐obligation bond issues, with all these funds to be
used for the repair Residential roads and the associated drains.
At the same time, the city continued repairs and maintenance of the Arterials, Collectors,
and School Routes through the County Return‐to‐Source sales tax and gas tax funds,
supplemented by some federal, state, and regional grants.
In the Nov. 17 and Dec. 15, 2015 City Council meetings, the Council reviewed recent
reports from CIOC, and concluded that the goals for pavement quality should be made
more stringent. While increasing near‐term repair costs, long‐term maintenance costs are
expected to be reduced by more than the increase in repair costs.
In March, 2016, the city received the final report from Shaaf and Wheeler, an engineering
firm hired to evaluate Orinda's storm drain system to make estimates of drain‐system
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 106
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
12
repairs that may be required, including prioritization and cost estimates for the repairs. In
the March, 2016, update of the Roads and Drainage Repairs Plan the CIOC and city staff
recommended the introduction of another funding phase, to fund the modified pavement‐
quality goals and the increased storm‐drain‐repair requirements.
Cost‐Saving Items
With the passage of the two bond measures in 2014 and 2016, in advance of the schedule
originally anticipated in the plan, the city now has the funds required to pursue a rapid and
more efficient program for long‐needed repairs of our residential roads. Additional
benefits of this more‐rapid approach include securing favorable unit costs through larger‐
scale contracts and taking advantage of current low oil prices, a major factor in the cost of
asphalt.
To understand how to best use the available funds and other resources, the city requires
quantitative measures of pavement condition. A key element of this process is the
Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program (P‐TAP), a program developed by
the Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). This program uses federal
dollars to help Bay Area cities and counties stretch their budgets by:
o Implementing, updating and maintaining pavement management databases
o Providing accurate pavement condition data to city councils, county supervisors
or other local decision makers
o Providing engineering design assistance for pavement rehabilitation projects
o Supporting management of non‐pavement street and road assets such as signs,
storm drains, curbs and gutters, traffic signals and street lights
Through this program, Orinda pays only a small fraction (about 20%) of the cost for
consultants to assess the condition of our roads. Arterial and Collector streets are
assessed every two years, and Residential streets are assessed every 4 years. The results
of these assessments are reported every two years. As examples, below are the costs for
the last three grant/reporting cycles:
o PTAP 13 ‐ MTC grant $27,828; local match $5,565
o PTAP 15 ‐ MTC grant $8,000; local match $2,000 (much lower since only
Arterials/Collectors are field evaluated)
o PTAP 17 ‐ MTC grant $27,810; local match $7,900
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 107
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
13
MTC also developed the StreetSaver software, which is used to estimate remaining
pavement lifetime and the cost of repairs that would be required to bring pavement
segments up to "very good" condition. Analysis runs can be performed for various sets of
goals, allowing staff to make informed decisions regarding the maintenance and repair of
roads.
To supplement the city's own funding sources, city staff researches applicable grant
programs, and has had frequent success in applying for grants to support repair work.
Through these efforts, about $9.2 million dollars in additional funds has been received
since 2012. A detailed list of these grants is included in Attachment 6.
Significant cost savings were accomplished by the introduction of the Full‐Depth
Reclamation (FDR) process, which dramatically reduces the amount of material that must
be removed from the repair site and taken to a dump site, and virtually eliminates the
requirement for crushed rock to be trucked in to the repair site. Overall, this approach
significantly reduces the cost of major road repairs, while still producing a high‐quality
result. See Attachment 9 for further details.
In addition, the City has teamed with neighboring cities to share costs where possible.
Examples include Ivy Drive repairs along the Orinda/Moraga border and Whitehall Court
along the Orinda/Lafayette border. In each case, the work was jointly funded by the two
cities.
Storm Drains ‐ Inspection and Repairs
The city of Orinda has roughly 19 miles of storm drain pipes and culverts associated with
our public roads. Assessment of the storm‐drain system, performing repairs where
needed, is a key aspect of the Roads and Drains program. The storm drain system was
investigated in detail as part of the CIC investigations, as reported in the July, 2006 CIC
report. An additional study was performed in 2015 and 2016 by the Schaaf and Wheeler
engineering firm, as reported in the March, 2016 Storm Drain Plan.
A large number of the smaller drains and culverts under our roads have already been
addressed. As a routine part of the ongoing road‐repair projects, all associated storm
drains, for which at least one end of the drain is accessible, are inspected, cleaned, and
repaired or replaced as appropriate. Examples are shown in the photographs below.
Table 3 summarizes the inspection, cleaning, and repair of storm drains associated with
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 108
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
14
the road segments repaired in the 2017 Residential Roads Paving Program.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 109
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
15
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 110
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
16
Table 3: Storm Drain Inspection, Cleaning, and Repair/Replacement (Linear Feet) for
the 2017 Residential Roads Paving Program
Linear Ft
Cleaning of Storm Drain Pipe 12,088
CCTV Inspection of Storm Drain Pipe 12,088
Repair and Replace with 10"‐36" HDPE Pipe 800
Repair and Replace Shallow w/ 6"‐24" HDPE 1000
New 12"‐18" HDPE Pipe 200
Centrifugally ‐ Cast Conc. Pipe Liner 32"‐36" 510
Linear Ft
Curb and Gutter 3,007
AC Dike (Asphalt curb) 10,211
12" Deep V Ditch‐CD60 509
10” and 18” Valley Gutter 620
However, many of the city's larger culverts, which are generally deeper below the
pavement, and often below our arterials, collectors, and school routes, have not been
addressed. A list of some of the storm drains and culverts particularly in need of attention
is given in Attachment 7. The list is based on the 2016 Storm Drain Plan, which identified
storm drains that were under capacity for a 10 year storm event or were in poor
condition. We need to perform a detailed engineering study of the storm drains
associated with our roads. The recommended Phase 4 funding of $15 Million is proposed
to address this study, and includes a rough estimate of the funds required to perform the
study and accomplish the most critical repairs. Recent dramatic failures of storm drains at
Miner Rd and Tarabrook Drive, as well as the large construction projects to upgrade the
storm drains under North Lane and Glorietta Blvd clearly show that storm drain repairs can
be very disruptive and very costly
Key Events and Milestones
A summary of key events and milestones is given in the table of Attachment 5.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 111
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
17
NEXT STEPS
This plan explicitly assumes that the City will continue to fund repair and maintenance of
the Arterials, Collectors, and School Routes through the annual Pavement Management
Program, using funds from Gas Tax and Return to Source.
The focus for Residential roads remains on repairing the worst roads. For these roads,
repairs will generally require pavement reconstruction, such as Full Depth Reclamation. In
the 2018 and 2019 paving projects, however, the program will move on to Residential
roads that are less distressed, and the repairs will shift to less costly, simpler processes,
such as milling with a thin overlay and slurry seals (with and without minor patching).
The funding plan consists of the five phases, as summarized in Table 4, below. In Phase 1
through Phase 4 the City will fund, plan, and manage the construction and repair of public
roads and drains. Phases 1 through 3 provide funding for repair of the Residential roads
and associated drains, including culverts close to the pavement surface. Phase 4 focuses
on the arterials, collectors, and school routes, plus major storm drain repairs, including
larger, deeper culverts. The final phase, Phase 5, will address the on‐going maintenance of
the newly reconstructed roadways and drainage system.
Phases 1, 2, and 3 are already fully funded, and are being used in parallel, to repair the
City’s Residential roads, starting with those that are used most frequently and are in the
worst condition. Phase 1 is funded through the 1/2‐cent Orinda sales tax (Measure L),
which was approved 2012, and continues through 2023. This tax is estimated to generate
approximately $1 million per year over the 10‐year life of the tax. Phase 2 is funded
through the $20 million general‐obligation bond approved in 2014 (Measure J). Phase 3 is
funded through the $25 Million general‐obligation bond (Measure L) approved in 2016.
Phase 4 is intended to provide the remaining funds required to complete the repair process
for our public roads (primarily the arterials, collectors, and school routes ‐ see Attachment
8) and major storm drains (see Attachment 7).
A future revenue source, not presently specified, will be required, to perform these
repairs. The additional revenue required for Phase 4 is estimated at $22 million. The
recommended funding includes $15 Million to perform a detailed engineering study of our
drainage system and to accomplish the most critical repairs, including funding for a full‐
time Drainage Program Project Manager to manage and oversee drain projects, and $7
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 112
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
18
Million to complete repairs of our most‐used roads. The amount of additional funding
required to complete these repairs may be less than this, if final construction costs for the
2018 and 2019 paving projects and for much ‐needed drainage improvements come in
lower than present estimates.
Table 4 – Multi‐Phase Approach to Fund Orinda’s Roads and Drainage Repairs
Phase 1 Approved 2012
2012 ‐
2021
Funded through 2022, with annual increments Half‐Cent Sales Tax (Measure L)with a 10‐Year Sunset
Appropriated Annually by the City Council
Phase 2 Approved 2014
2014 Fully Funded
$20 Million General Obligation Bond (Measure J) for Residential Roads repairs
Phase 3 Approved 2016
2016 Fully Funded
$25 Million General Obligation Bond (Bond Measure L) for Residential Roads repairs
Phase 4 2020
Approximately $22 Million of new revenue for primarily for repairs of arterials, collectors, school routes and storm drains, to
be raised by a Bond, Parcel Tax, or other new source
Phase 5 2020
Approximately $1 Million per year for maintenance of Arterials, Collectors and Bus Routes
and
Approximately $2.5 Million per year for maintenance of Residential Roads
Extension of the Half‐Cent Sales Tax plus approximately 1.5 Million per year from other Revenue Sources, SB1, CCTA, Vehicle
Impact fee
By early 2020, it will be essential that the City establish an ongoing funding stream to
support maintenance of the public roadways. Without additional funds for routine
maintenance, the recently repaired roads will begin to degrade. It is generally accepted
that the costs to maintain a road are generally significantly lower than the cost of to repair
the road once it has significantly degraded. As a result, the long‐term interests of the city
are best served by providing an adequate funding stream to support proper maintenance
of our roads. If citizens of Orinda approve the recommended $22 million financing in 2018,
the funds would be available in 2019 and the work on the most critical drains and needed
repair for Arterial and Collectors can begin in year 2020 and continue thru year 2025.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 113
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
19
Phase 5 is intended to provide the longer‐term funding stream to support routine
maintenance of the roads and drains, to maintain the public roads at an average PCI of 70
or greater, with no road having a PCI that falls below 50... Based upon current material
and labor costs, the annual cost of maintaining the roads has been estimated at $3.5
million, though costs may increase beyond that level if there are unanticipated increases.
Estimated revenues available from the Gas Tax and the Return‐to‐Source funds for the
roads in 2022 are estimated to be approximately $1 million. The Measure L ½‐cent sales
tax, which currently generates approximately $1 million per year, will expire in 2023 As a
result, the core of Phase 5 is proposed to be an extension of the ½ cent sales tax.
It is possible that the City would able to commit additional funding to road maintenance
from increased property tax revenues, reducing the need for other new revenue sources
for Phase 5. However, it is very likely that some level of additional funding will be
required. Potential additional revenue sources include a real estate transfer tax, a parcel
tax, or a general‐obligation bond, all of which would require voter approval.
A caveat, regarding on‐going maintenance: It is important to note that Orinda roads are
built on soil that expands and contracts significantly during our cycle of wet winters and
dry, hot summers. Furthermore, the hillsides on which many of our roads are built are
intrinsically unstable. As a result, it is inevitable that the soil beneath our roads will move,
no matter how well the road’s base is constructed. We can, and do, mitigate this to some
extent with careful design and robust construction. Nonetheless, some level of damage to
many of our roads, due to underlying soil motion, is inevitable. We must keep this in
mind, as we plan our budgets.
The following table summarizes the funding and expenditures associated with the city's
completed, in progress, and planned road/drains repair projects, through 2019.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 114
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
20
Funding Source 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TOTAL
Gas Tax $490,000 $440,000 $578,005 $200,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,908,005
54 SOUTHWOOD COURT SOUTHWOOD DR. CUL‐DE‐SAC 310 M & O
55 SOUTHWOOD DRIVE TARA RD CUL‐DE‐SAC 620 M & O
56 SPRING ROAD BROOKWOOD RD. 132 SPRING ROAD 1,770 M & O
57 TAHOS ROAD NORTHERLY PROP LINE 565 TAHOS CUL DE SAC 1,613 FDR
58 TARABROOK DRIVE TARA RD. CUL‐DE‐SAC 1,340 FDR
59 TARRY LANE 53 TARRY LN. VAN TASSEL LN. 1,350 FDR
60 TARRY LANE LOMBARDY LN SLEEPY HOLLOW LN. 500 M & O
61 UNDERHILL ROAD SPRING RD. CAMINO ENCINAS 1,710 FDR
62 VALENCIA ROAD DON GABRIEL WAY ALTAMOUNT DRIVE 1,730 FDR
63 VALLEY COURT VALLEY DR. CUL‐DE‐SAC 200 FDR
64 VASHELL WAY Moraga Way Davis Road 450 M & O
65 VIA HERMOSA LA ESPIRAL LOOP END 2,000 FDR
66 VIANNE COURT HILLCREST DR. CUL‐DE‐SAC 300 FDR
2018 PAVMENT REHABILITATION ‐ ARTERIAL STREETSSTREET# Street Name Begin Location End Location Length (FT) Treatment
67 MINER ROAD CAMINO PABLO BIEN VENIDA 1,480 M & O68 MINER ROAD BIEN VENIDA CAMINO DON MIGUEL 1,895 M & O
69 MINER ROAD CAMINO DON MIGUEL LOMBARDY LN 2,130 M & O
70 MINER ROAD PAVTCHANGE GARDINER CT. 1,630 FDR
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 125
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n
33
2019 Paving Program
The scope of work for 2019 consists of rehabilitating 145 street segments in 125 streets
using two types of pavement rehabilitation (i) Mill & Overlay (M&O) and (ii) Slurry Seal. As
with prior years, drainage Improvements will be performed prior to paving work, including
partial or full replacement of storm drain pipes under streets, where needed.
Mill & Overlay rehabilitation is used when the existing pavement shows signs of surface
failures but the damage is not so severe that it warrants complete reconstruction of the
pavement. The process involves removal of the top few inches of asphalt pavement by
milling, and then replacing it with new asphalt overlay. Areas of pavement that show severe
distress due to failure of the aggregate base layer will be removed and replaced prior to
installing the final asphalt overlay.
Slurry Seal is the application of a mixture of asphalt emulsion and very small crushed rock
aggregates to the existing asphalt pavement surface. The process of placing this mixture
(Slurry) on pavement surface is referred as “seal” because it is intended to seal the
blemishes in the pavement surface. As with the Mill and Overlay method, areas of pavement
that show severe distress due to failure of the aggregate base layer will be removed and
replaced prior to applying the asphalt emulsion.
Design work to prepare the plans, specifications, and estimates will begin in February of
2018. All the storm drains under the road will be cleaned and inspected prior to the
preparation of the design plans. The city plans to advertise the project in February 2019.
A project map and a list of the streets selected for construction in 2019 are attached below
for reference.
As a part of the 2019 project, approximately $3.5 million dollars is budgeted to improve
drainage components that were identified to be under capacity or in poor condition in the
2016 Storm Drain Plan. The table below shows a list of potential drainage improvements.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 126
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
34
Candle Terrace Extending north along
Candle Terrace from
Dalewood
Upsizing the existing 18‐inch pipe to a 24‐
inch RCP
Easton Ct. Along upper of Easton
Ct, extending east
towards Hall Dr.
To improve capacity, Replace 4 sections of
18‐inch pipe with 24‐inch RCP, and 3
sections of 21‐inch with 30‐inch RCP
El Caminito Intersection of El
Caminito and Camino
Sobrante
Replacing the existing arched CMP with a
36‐inch RCP and a new Parallel 24‐inch
RCP
Haceinda Circle Intersection of
Hacienda Circle and
Acacia Dr.
Upsizing the existing 18‐inch CMP to a 24‐
inch RCP to improve capacity
La Espiral Road Crossing La Espiral Rd.
approx. 1400’ NE of La
Vuelta
Upsizing the existing 12‐inch pipe to a
new 18‐ inch RCP
Sleepy Hollow Lane Near 500’ South Of
Normandy Lane
Upsizing the existing 24‐inch CMP to a 36‐
inch RCP
Various Locations Construct Concrete V Ditch and Curb and
Gutter to Control Surface Water Runoff
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 127
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
35
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 128
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
36
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 129
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
37
STREET # Street Name Begin Location End Location Length (FT) Width (FT) Area (SF) Current PCI Treatment
2019 PAVMENT REHABILITATION ‐ RESIDENTIAL STREETS
1 ACACIA DRIVE MANZANITA DR. CUL‐DE‐SAC 1,935 22 42,570 45 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY2 ALICE LANE 1000'W/ZANDER DRIVE DONALD DRIVE 1,100 26 28,600 67 SLURRY SEAL & DIGOUTS
3 ALTARINDA CIRCLE E. ALTARINDA DR. CUL‐DE‐SAC 245 25 6,125 80 SLURRY SEAL & DIGOUTS
2019 PAVMENT REHABILITATION ‐ ARTERIAL STREETS STREET # Street Name Begin Location End Location Length (FT) Width (FT) Area (SF) Current PCI Treatment
1 EL TOYONAL CAMINO PABLO LOMA VISTA (EAST) 1,781 18 32,058 41 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
2 LAS VEGAS ROAD VIA LAS CRUCES ST. STEPHENS DRIVE 320 19 6,080 38 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
3 LOMA VISTA DRIVE EL DORADO LN EL TOYONAL (EAST) 1,586 18 28,548 47 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
4 LOMBARDY LANE MINER ROAD TARRY LANE 1,136 23 26,128 50 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
5 ORINDA WAY SANTA MARIA WAY 682FT N/O SANTA MARIA V 682 50 34,100 50 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
6 SOUTHWOOD DRIVE MORAGA WAY TARA RD 1,600 20 32,000 54 MILL AND THIN OVERLAY
7 VIA LAS CRUCES HONEY HILL RD. LAS VEGAS RD. 730 29 21,170 24 MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
Residential Segments = 145
Residential Streets = 125
Arterial/Collector Segments = 7
Arterial/Collector Streets = 7
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 133
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n
41
Conclusion
To conclude this report, there are a few key points that merit repeating for emphasis. While much has been accomplished, there are still several facets of the long‐range plan for Orinda’s roads, drainage, and related infrastructure that must be attended‐to over the next several years and beyond. The current available funding sources will carry the residential road repair program to a very successful level of completion. It is forecast that by the end of the 2019 program, Orinda’s Pavement Condition Index will achieve an average level of close to 90, or “Very Good” to “Excellent” condition; one of the best city‐wide ratings in the area. Additionally, as stated in the report, the current funding will enable the engineering and repair of the storm‐drains under and adjacent to the residential road upgrades. However, in spite of all the successes, it must be noted that the effort is not complete. Current funding does not address the repairs and rebuilding required for some remaining arterial and collector streets and associated storm drain systems. As described in this report, the Citizens Infrastructure Oversight Commission continues to recommend that Orinda pursue additional funding efforts to address this unmet need. Additionally, the city must bear in mind that roads and drainage systems wear out over time. This report continues to note that Orinda must identify and develop a long‐term road and infrastructure program that creates sources of sufficient funds to maintain our road and drainage systems to a level that reflects the improvements achieved over the last several years. It would be extremely disappointing to every citizen of our city, if the money and effort that has been spent to date, were allowed to “wash away” due to lack of proper care and maintenance. With respect, this report is submitted to the City Council by the Citizens Infrastructure Oversight Commission for your review and approval.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 134
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
42
Attachments
1. Attachment 1 – Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Ratings Definition with
Images of Varying PCI Ratings and Impact of Drain Failure
2. Attachment 2 –City of Orinda Pavement Management Program Policy and
Criteria for Selecting Streets for Repair Using Measure L Sales Tax Fund,
Approved January 21, 2014
3. Attachment 3 – CIOC Annual Report to the City Council, 2017
4. Attachment 4 ‐‐ Glossary of Terms. Summary of terms used in this report
5. Attachment 5 ‐‐ Timeline Roads and Drains Milestones and Projects
6. Attachment 6 ‐ ‐ Grants Applied for and Awarded, to Support Orinda Roads
and Drains Projects
7. Attachment 7 ‐‐ Storm Drains Likely to Need Near‐Term Repairs
8. Attachment 8 ‐‐ Arterials, Collectors, and School Routes Sill in Need of Repairs
9. Attachment 9 ‐‐ Full Depth Reclamation Overview
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 135
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 1
Attachment 1
Pavement Condition Definitions
PCI Range Condition Description
90‐100 Excellent Little or no distress.
70‐89 Good to Very Good
Little or no distress, with the exception of utility patches in good condition, or minor to moderate hairline cracks; typically lightly weathered.
50‐69 Fair
Light to moderate weathering, light load‐related base failure, moderate linear cracking.
25‐49 Poor
Moderate to severe weathering, moderate levels of base failure, moderate to heavy linear cracking.
0‐24 Very Poor Extensive weathering, moderate to heavy base failure, failed patches, extensive network of moderate to heavy linear cracking.
Please see the photographs below for examples roads at various PCI’s.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 136
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 1
Charles Hill Road PCI = 8
Ardith Drive at Darnby PCI = 47
Greenwood Court PCI =15
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 137
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 1
Rheem Blvd PCI = 70
Claremont Avenue PCI = 80
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 138
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 2
Attachment 2
City of Orinda Pavement Management Program (PMP)
Policy and Criteria for Selecting Streets for Repair Using Measure L Sales Tax Funds Approved January 21, 2014
Policy With the adoption of the Measure L, .5% Sales tax, the City has an additional source of funds for road repair and reconstruction. This Measure represents the first phase of a multi‐year plan to repair all the City’s streets. Even with this additional funding, current budgetary constraints and the poor and deteriorating condition of Orinda’s roads require the City to apply budgeted funds only to those residential roads where the most benefit for the most residents can be obtained. With the Measure L funds the City has committed to make repair of the residential roads a priority. The goal of this program is to distribute the residential roads to be repaired throughout the City. The Program Annually, funds permitting, roads to be repaired will be selected as follows:
1. The street segments must be classified as residential.
2. The street segments must be among the worst residential roads, which means the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for that segment of road as calculated by the StreetSaver program is less than or equal to 25, and with ride quality (roughness of ride) considered using an acceptable objective measure.
3. The most heavily used residential road segments, based on actual traffic counts, will be repaired first. The road segments will be rank in descending order of traffic volume, with the highest volume road segments forming a pool of candidate roads for the annual program.
4. Other factors, such as equitable distribution of the projects throughout the
community and underground utility repair schedules, will be considered in selecting the annual list of road segments to be repaired.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 139
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 3
Attachment 3
Citizens’ Infrastructure Oversight Commission
Annual Report to the Orinda City Council
2017
Attached by Reference
The Annual Report can be found on the City’s Web Site under the Roads and
Infrastructure Tab.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 140
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 4
Attachment 4
Glossary of Terms AC ‐ Arterials, Collectors and Bus Routes Those public roads that have the greatest use and suffer the most wear and tear requiring more frequent service and repair.
ADT ‐ Average Dally Traffic This is a measure of the frequency of use of a road and is used to help determine which repair project will benefit the greatest number of residents.
Annual Report An annual report made by the CIOC to the Council detailing activities regarding the pavement management program over the past year.
Associated Drainage This includes existing pipes, culverts and gutters under and adjacent to the roadway surface. Note that the city has limited authority to address drainage that passes through private property (including PG&E property).
Bond and Tax Measures The sales tax [2012 Measure L] and bond measures [2014 Bond Measure J and 2016 Bond Measure L] approved by the voters to repair public residential roads.
Drain ‐ Storm Drain Any of the drains used to carry off surface water.
CIOC ‐ Citizens Infrastructure Oversight Commission A commission established by the City Council to recommend a long‐term infrastructure plan for their review and approval, monitor the pavement management program, and report achievements and plans, at least annually.
City The City of Orinda
FDR‐Full Depth Reclamation A process for rebuilding seriously damaged roads, in which the existing pavement is removed, pulverized and blended with cement to create a stable base for new pavement.
Gas Tax A portion of the taxes collected on each gallon of gas and returned to the City for our use.
MTC ‐ Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation planning, financing, and coordinating agency for the nine‐county San Francisco Bay Area.
Overlay Process where new pavement [can be thick or thin] is placed over existing pavement, to repair the road and extend the service life.
PCI ‐ Pavement Condition Index Estimation of the overall condition of a portion
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 141
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 4
of a road, determined by inspection. PCI issued by Staff, the CIOC and the Council to decide the order for work to be done and type of repair to be used.
Pavement Management Plan The plan developed by city staff and the CIOC and approved by the City Council for the repair of all public roads, including the associated storm drains.
PMP ‐ Pavement Management Program The program for the repair and maintenance of City roads.
Roads Repair Policy The policy recommended by the CIOC and adopted by the City Council and used to determine the selection of roads to be repaired.
Private Roads Roads owned by anyone other than the City of Orinda [except Hwy‐#24] where it is the responsibility of the owner(s) to repair and maintain both the road and any associated storm drains
P‐TAP ‐ Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program Reports prepared by an outside engineering firm, typically every two years on the odd‐numbered years. The report includes assessments of pavement conditions for the city's roads, and projects repair and maintenance costs for the City's public roads.
Public Roads Any road owned and maintained by the City [except Hwy #24].
RTS‐Return to Source Funds from the Countywide Transportation Sales Tax returned to the City to fund transportation projects. This 1/2‐cent sales tax program, managed by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, is also known as CCT Measure J. This sales tax is completely separate from the 1/2‐cent Orinda sales tax (Orinda's Measure L).
Slurry and Crack Seal A process where existing pavement has any cracks sealed and a coat of slurry [asphalt emulsion] applied to prevent water intrusion and extend the service life.
StreetSaver The software program developed for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, to estimate remaining pavement lifetime and the cost to bring up to "very good" condition. Allows staff to make informed decisions regarding the maintenance and repair of roads.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 142
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 5
Attachment 5
Timeline: Roads and Drains Milestones and Projects
1985 City of Orinda Incorporated ‐ ‐ City inherits 92.5 miles of public roads
Aug., 1990 City Council establishes policy regarding conversion of private roads to public roads Resolution Number 56‐90
1992 ‐ 2012 City spent an average of $2.3 million per year on street maintenance and repairs. Approximately $0.8 million annually was drawn from the City’s General Fund and the Garbage Franchise Fees and used for routine street maintenance (potholes, striping, sweeping, drainage, etc.). Approximately $1.5 million annually was made available for pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction, drawn from dedicated sources of funds ‐‐ Gas Tax, the countywide transportation sales tax Return‐to‐Source funds, and grant revenues from county and federal sources averaged over the 10‐year period.
October, 2004 City Council created the Citizen's Infrastructure Committee City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item G‐2 10/9/2004 Agenda Topic: Formation of Citizens’ Committee to Develop a Strategic Plan for Reconstruction and Maintenance Infrastructure
July, 2006 Citizens Infrastructure Committee Report released. Conclusions included: ‐ 20–year cost of repairing all publicly owned roads in Orinda approximately $ 72million ‐ Estimated cost to repair drains ~$13 Million ‐ Limiting repairs to the most frequently‐used roads (at least 500 average daily trips) and the most critical drains would still require ~ $60 Million, total. City Council Staff Report , Agenda Item G‐2 7/18/2006 Agenda Title: Roadway, Storm and Water main Improvements, Adopt Ordinance 06‐03 setting Election for Infrastructure Bond Measure City Council Passed and Adopted Ordinance 06‐03 on 7/18/2006
Nov., 2006 Measure Q, $60 Million general‐obligation bond measure fails (64.4% in favor) City Council Staff Report , Agenda Item I‐2 12/19/2006 Agenda Title : Infrastructure Discussion
March, 2007 City Council establishes the Citizen's Infrastructure Oversight Commission (CIOC) Resolution Number 04‐07, Passed and adopted by the City Council on 2/7/2007
June, 2007 Measure E, $60 Million general‐obligation bond measure fails (63.4% in favor) City Council Staff Report , Agenda Item G‐5 6/19/2007 Agenda Title: Canvass of Votes for June 5,2007, Special Municipal Election Resolution 36‐07, Accepting Canvass of votes for the June 5, 2007, Special Municipal Election
Dec., 2007 City Council updates and clarifies composition and charter of the CIOC Resolution Number 78‐07 In the Matter of : Policies Governing the Citizens’ Infrastructure Oversight Commission Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orinda at a meeting of Council Held on 12/18/2007
Aug., 2010 City Council establishes Neighborhood Initiated Road Repair Policy City Council Staff Report , Agenda Item I‐2 , 8/7/2010 Agenda Title: Review and Approve the Neighborhood Initiated Road Repair Policy
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 143
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 5
May, 2012 Contract award for the Glorietta Storm Drain Improvements Project. Total project cost $1.65 Million. City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐1 Agenda Title: Award of the Construction Contract for the Glorietta Storm Drain Improvements Project No.3025
July, 2012 10‐Year Roads Repair plan established. ‐ Plan called for 4 funding phases, to raise a total revenue of $58.4 Million (2011 dollars)‐ Pavement Condition Index Goal: Ave PCI =70 Gas Tax and Return‐To‐Source (Arterial s, etc.) $10 Million, over 10 years Phase 1 (2012): 1/2‐cent sales tax (estimated to be $6.7 Million, through 2022) Phase 2 (2016): $20M Bond or parcel tax Phase 3 (2020): $20M Bond or parcel tax Phase 4 (2022): Extension of 1/2‐cent sales tax (Approx. $0.7 Million/yr, starting 2024) City Council Staff Report: Agenda Item I‐2, 7/12/2012 Agenda Title: Proposed 10‐year Roads and Drains Repair and Maintenance Plan Resolution Number 38‐12, Approving a 10 Year Roads and Drains Repair and Maintenance Plan
July, 2012 Contract awarded for repair of segments of Orinda Way, Rheem Blvd, Camino Sobrante, Overhill Road, and Valley View Drive. Project total cost $ 1.64 Million. City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item G‐3, 7/17/2012 Agenda Title: Award of Construction Contract for the City of Orinda 2012‐2013 Pavement Rehabilitation Project Number 3098 to Bay Cities Paving & Grading Inc., of Concord
July, 2012 Full‐depth reclamation (FDR) was introduced, with initial use on Camino Sobrante, Overhill Road, and Valley View Drive, to reduce cost while retaining high quality.
Oct., 2012
Manzanita Rd Bridge replacement project awarded. Total Cost $ 3, 275,800 Federal Fund : $2,849,823 Transportation Impact fees $274,393 Gas Tax: $63,801 EBMUD Reimbursement: $105,626 City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item G‐3 10/16/2012 Agenda Title: Award of the Construction Contract for the Manzanita Drive Bridge Replacement Project Number 0043
Nov., 2012 1/2‐cent sales tax approved by voters ‐ Funds first available in April, 2013. Sales tax authorization ends in 2023 ‐ Funds created ~ $1 Million per year Resolution Number 65‐12 , Adopted December 4, 2012
Dec 2012 Condition of arterials and collectors continues to improve.
April, 2009 # of Arterial/Collector segments with ave PCI < 50 43
Dec., 2011 # of Arterial/Collector segments with ave PCI < 50 25
Dec., 2012 # of Arterial/Collector segments with ave PCI < 50 19
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 144
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 5
Dec., 2012 Tarabrook sinkhole developed December, 2012 ‐ ‐ Repair completed last 2013 at a cost of approximately $1.44 Million Resolution number 71‐12, Adopted by the City Council on 12/7/2012 Resolution number 74‐12 Adopted by the City Council on 12/18/2012 Resolution number 08‐13 Adopted by the City Council on 2/5/2013 Resolution number 12‐13 Adopted by the City Council on 2/19/2013 Resolution number 17‐13 Adopted by the City Council on 3/5/2013 Resolution number 26‐13 Adopted by the City Council on 4/9/2013 City Council Staff Report Agenda Item G‐5, May 20, 2014, Project Acceptance of the Tarabrook Drive Storm Water Improvements, City Council Accepted the Project on 5/20/2014
Jan., 2014 CIOC recommends, and City Council approves, a policy in which residential roads be repaired starting with the "Busiest and Worst First" City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐3 1/21/2014 Agenda Title: Approve Policy and Criteria for Selecting Streets for Repair Using Measure L 0.5% Sales Tax Funds
April, 2014 10‐Year Roads Repair plan updated and revised ‐ Plan called for 4 funding phases to raise a total revenue of $66 Million (2014 dollars) Gas Tax and Return‐To‐Source (Arterial s, etc.) $9.5 Million, over 10 years Phase 1 (2012): 1/2‐cent sales tax Approx. $10 Million thru 2022 Phase 2 (2014): $20M Bond Phase 3 (2018): $25M Bond Phase 4 (2022): Extension of 1/2‐cent sales tax plus undefined additional funds for maintenance Approx. $1.3 Million in 2023 City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐1 , 4/22/2014 Agenda Title: Adopt Resolution Approving 2014‐10 Year Road and Drainage Repairs Plan Resolution Number 13‐14 Approving 2014‐10 Year Road and Drainage Repairs
Nov., 2014 Bond Measure J, $20 Million General Obligation Bond approved
Nov., 2014 2015 Paving Programs Approved ‐ Length of roads repaired: Residential 1.1 Miles Arterials, etc. 2.9 Miles Approved Plan Final Cost ‐ Arterials and Collectors $1.21 Million $ 0.69 Million ‐ Measure L 1/2‐cent sales Tax $0.98 Million $ 0.91 Million ‐ Measure J (2014) Bond $5.05 Million $ 5.02Million TOTAL $7.24 Million $ 6.62 Million City Council Staff Report I‐3 11/5/2104 Agenda Tile: Approval of list of Streets and Authorization to Proceed with Project Design for the FY 2015 Measure J Pavement Project
Oct., 2015 2016 Paving Programs Approved ‐ Length of roads repaired: Residential 8.1 Miles Arterials, etc. 0.7 Miles Approved Plan Final Cost ‐ Arterials and Collectors $ 1.9 Million $ 0.89 Million ‐ Measure L 1/2‐cent sales Tax $ 0.9 Million $ 1.04 Million ‐ Measure J (2014) Bond $ 6.2 Million $ 5.26 Million TOTAL $ 9.0 Million $ 7.19 Million City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐2 10/6/2015 Agenda Title: Approval of List of Streets and Authorization with Project Design for FY 2016 Measure J and L Pavement Project
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 145
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 5
Nov., 2015
Award of an Engineering Design Services Contract for the 2016 and 2017 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehabilitation Projects City Council Staff Report Agenda Item I‐4 11/17/2017 Agenda Title: Award of an Engineering Design Services Contract for the 2016 and 2017 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehabilitation Projects
March, 2016 Storm Drain Plan completed, supported by Schaaf and Wheeler, Civil Engineers. Report describes status of Orinda's storm drain system and details key storm drain repair requirements. City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item: G‐2 3/24/2016 Agenda Title: Presentation of Final Draft Storm Drain Plan
March, 2016
Roads and Drains Plan Update ‐ Plan now calls for 5 funding phases, to raise a total revenue of $88 Million (2014 dollars) ‐ In Nov., 2015 the City Council agreed to change goals to "Average PCI = 70, and no road with PCI < 50". The staff report projected a cost increase of approx. $13 Million to support this change. Further funding requirements were identified for repairs of key storm drains and conduits as well as remaining repairs to arterials, collectors, and school routes. These funding requirements were combined into a new Phase 4. Gas Tax and Return‐To‐Source (Arterial s, etc.) $10 Million, over 10 years Phase 1 (2012) 1/2‐cent sales tax ‐ ‐ Funded Phase 2 (2014) $20M Bond ‐ ‐ Funded Phase 3 (2016) $25M Bond ‐ ‐ Bond measure passed in Nov., 2016 Phase 4 (2018) $22 Million new revenue Phase 5 (2022) Extension of 1/2‐cent sales tax plus undefined additional funds for maintenance Approx. $1.3 Million in 2023 City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐1 3/15/2016 Agenda Title: Adopt Resolution 21‐16 Approving Road and Drainage Repairs Plan ( As Updated in 2016), Dated March 15,2016
May, 2016 Contract awarded for the North Lane Storm Drain Project in the amount of $2,298,827 ‐ Approximately 1,300 feet of 60inch reinforced concrete storm drain pipe installed ‐ The new pipe works in addition to the pre‐existing metal pipe/open‐channel system ‐ 75% of construction cost funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency ‐ The remaining 25 % was split between the City of Orinda and EBMUD. City Council Staff Report, Item G‐3 5/17/2016 Agenda Title: Award of Construction Contract for the North Lane Storm Water Mitigation Project N. 4070 to Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. of Concord
Nov., 2016 CIOC status report: Reduced estimate of total repair costs, from $47 Million prior estimate, to $45 Million new estimate 1) Low oil prices and savings from the economy of scale of our large project; 2) Accelerating the rehabilitation work to be done faster than originally scheduled; 3) Net savings on the bids from 2015 and 2016 Paving project.
Nov., 2016 2017 Paving Programs approved: Length of roads to be repaired: Residential 10.5 Miles Arterials, etc. 0.9 Miles Approved Plan Final Cost ‐ Arterials and Collectors: $ 0.82 Million ‐ Measure L 1/2‐cent sales Tax $ 0.99 Million ‐ Measure J (2014) Bond $ 10.49 Million TOTAL $ 12.30 Million (Project in not complete, so final cost is not available)
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 146
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 5
Nov., 2016 2018 Paving Program ‐ Preliminary plan approved ‐ Length of roads to be repaired: Residential 13.7 Miles Arterials, etc. 1.3 Miles Preliminary Plan ‐ Arterials and Collectors: $ 0.60 Million ‐ Measure L 1/2‐cent sales Tax $ 1.05 Million ‐ Measure J (2014) Bond $ 0.95 Million ‐ Measure L (2016) Bond $ 12.17 Million TOTAL $ 14.76 Million City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐1 11/1/2016 Agenda Title: Approval of list of Streets for Pavement Rehabilitation in 2018 and 2019 for the Annual, Measure J and Measure L Pavement Rehabilitation Projects and Status of the City’s Road and Drainage Repairs Plan
Nov., 2016 2019 Paving Program ‐ Preliminary plan approved: ‐ Length of roads to be repaired: Residential 25.4 Miles Arterials, etc. 1.5 Miles Preliminary Plan ‐ Arterials and Collectors: $ 1.05 Million ‐ Measure L 1/2‐cent sales Tax $ 1.00 Million ‐ Measure L (2016) Bond $ 13.18 Million TOTAL $ 15.23 Million City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item I‐1 11/1/2016 Agenda Title: Approval of list of Streets for Pavement Rehabilitation in 2018 and 2019 for the Annual, Measure J and Measure L Pavement Rehabilitation Projects and Status of the City’s Road and Drainage Repairs Plan
March, 2017 Bond Measure L, $25 Million General Obligation Bond approved Resolution No. 27‐17 3/21/2017 In the Matter of: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORINDA AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS NOT TO EXCEED $10,000,000 (ELECTION OF 2014, SERIES B) AND $25,000,000 (ELECTION OF 2016, SERIES A) BY NEGOTIATED SALE; APPROVING THE FORM OF AND EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF ONE OR MORE PAYING AGENT AGREEMENTS, BOND PURCHASE CONTRACTS, CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS, AND TAX-EXEMPT GOVERNMENTAL BONDS TAX COMPLIANCE AND CONTINUING DISCLOSURE COMPLIANCE GUIDELINES; APPROVING THE FORM OF AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT DESCRIBING THE BONDS AND DISTRIBUTION THEREOF; AND AUTHORIZING OFFICERS OF THE CITY TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTIONS AND TO PREPARE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
May, 2017 Award of Construction Contract for the 2017 Annual and Measure J & L Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 4114/4115 to Bay Cities Paving & Grading Inc. City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item G‐5 5/16/2017
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 147
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 6
Attachment 6
Grants Applied for and Awarded, to Support Orinda Roads and Drains Projects
Storm Drains Likely to Need Near‐Term Repairs The criteria used to select storm drains for repairs were (1) storm drains that do not have adequate capacity for the 10 year storm runoff, or (2) storm drains in poor condition or (3) the storm drain is under an arterial or a collector which provides the only access to a large neighborhood Budgetary cost estimate: $15 Million. Engineering cost estimates were prepared for each repair project. Consistent with good engineering practice, a 20% contingency has been added to the combined project. Any funds remaining after the completion of the listed projects would allow other storm drains to be identified for repair/replacement.
Project Name Project Location
Reason for Improvement
Imp. Pipe Diameter(in)
Camino Pablo near Camino Encinas Existing pipe is not in good condition
(72")
Camino Pablo near Bear Creek Road Existing Pipe is not in good condition
(72")
Camino Pablo near Orinda Way
Existing Pipes are not in good condition
(multiple 24”)
Camino Pablo near Ardilla Lane Existing Pipes are
not in good condition
(multiple 18")
Camino Pablo near Los Amigos Ct. Lacks capacity to route the 10‐year design runoff
(24” to 36”)
Charles Hill Circle
600' east of Charles Hill Road
Existing 36” pipe is not in good condition
(36")
El Camino Moraga
near Dos Encinas/Del Rey Elementary
Existing pipes are not in good
condition and the road provides the only access to a neighborhood
(two 96”)
El Toyonal near El Rincon
Existing pipes are not in good
condition and the road provides the only access to a neighborhood
(24” and 60”)
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 149
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 7
Glorietta Blvd. near Rheem Blvd Existing 60” is not in good condition
(60”)
Glorietta Blvd. near Meadowview Road Lack Capacity to route the 10‐year design runoff
(18” upsize 36”)
Ivy Drive near Descanso Drive The pipe systems are not in good
condition
(two 24” and 48”)
Ivy Drive between Corte Sombrita and Ramona Drive
72 –inch CMP is not in good condition
(72")
Ivy Drive near Miramonte HS 144‐inch CMP is not in good condition
(144”)
Lombardy Lane 400’ east of Van Ripper Lane
Existing system under Lombardy
Lane Lacks capacity to route the 10‐year design runoff and this
road provides the only access to a neighborhood.
(36” to 54”)
Lombardy Lane near Van Tassel Lane Existing 72” CMP is not in good condition
(72")
Lost Valley Drive
near Edgewood Ct
The existing 48‐inch CMP is not in good condition and the road
provides the only access to a
neighborhood
(48")
Miner Road near Lombardy Lane
32‐inch CMP is not in good condition
(32”)
Miner Road near 1,000’ south of Camino Don Miguel
Existing CMP pipe is not in good condition
(72”)
Miner Road near Camino Lenada to Lombardy Lane
Existing pipes are not in good condition
(multiple 18")
Miner Road near Oak Arbor Road Lack capacity to route the 10‐year design run‐off for
18” to 36”)
Moraga Way near Orchard Road (north) 144‐inch CMP is not in good condition
(144”)
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 150
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 7
Moraga Way near Overhill Road The existing pipes are not in good
condition
(multiple 24" to 36")
Moraga Way near Orinda Oaks Park
Reinforced Concrete box is not in good condition
(RC BOX)
Orchard Road near Great Oaks Circle
60‐inch CMP is not in good condition
(60")
Orinda Way near Community Park
Lack capacity to route the 10‐year design run‐off
(24” to 48”)
Orinda Way near Camino Pablo Lack capacity to route the 10‐year design runoff
(36" to 42")
Rheem Blvd near Laura Way Existing pipe is not in good condition
(36")
Tahos Road near St. Stephens off ramp Lack Capacity to route the 10‐year design runoff
(24” to 42”)
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 151
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 8
Attachment 8
Arterials, Collectors, and School Routes Still in Need of Repairs Listed below are the Arterials, Collectors, and School Routes that are expected to be in need of repairs after the completion of the 2018 and 2019 paving projects. Budgetary cost estimate: $7 Million. Engineering cost estimates were prepared for each repair project. Consistent with good engineering practice, a 20% contingency has been added to the combined project. Any funds remaining after the completion of the listed projects would allow storm drains in addition to those listed in Attachment 7 to be identified for repair/replacement
Street Name Section Requiring Repair
Bear Creek Road
Brookwood Road West of Camino Pablo
Bryant Way
Camino Pablo Bear Creek Road to Miner Road
Camino Sobrante Camino Pablo to Orinda Way
E. Altarinda Drive Orindawoods to El Nido Ranch
Glorietta Blvd Hall Drive Moraga Way to Donald Drive
Honeyhill Road
Las Piedras
Lomas Contadas
Lombardy Lane North of Tarry Lane
Miner Road North of Lombardy Lane
Orindawoods Drive
Rheem Blvd
Santa Maria Way
Tara Road Southwood Drive to Nonie
NOTE: Orinda Way is scheduled to be repaved in 2019 using $620,000 of federal funds from the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program administered by MTC.
G.7.a
Packet Pg. 152
Att
ach
men
t: R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Rep
airs
Pla
n U
pd
ated
2-6
-18
(14
12 :
CIO
C R
oad
an
d D
rain
age
Pla
n a
pp
rova
l)
ATTACHMENT 8
Table below lists the complete history of maintenance and rehabilitation for Arterial and Collector streets for the past 20 years.
St Name Beg Loc End Loc Treatment Date Description