City Council Regular Meeting Agenda · 2017-06-01 · City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers, 333 S Meridian, Puyallup 98371 June 06, 2017 6:30 PM PLEDGE

City Council Regular Meeting AgendaPuyallup City Council Chambers,333 S Meridian, Puyallup 98371

June 06, 2017 6:30 PM

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

1 CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES

1.a. Minutes of May 9, 2017 May 9, 2017 Draft Minutes

2 PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS

2.a. 20-year Service Award Presentation to Cross Connection Specialist Mike Nelson

CITIZEN COMMENTS

3 CONSENT AGENDA

3.a. Street Repair - Overlay 2017 Design Contract Award 2017 Street Repair Overlay Scope & Budget

3.b. Authorization to Execute the Puyallup Police Association 2016-2018 Collective BargainingAgreement

3.c. Contract Award: Reservoir Roof Vent Replacement Bid Tab Reservoir Vent Replacement

4 ORDINANCES

4.a. First reading of an ordinance making it a crime to expose children to domestic violence Ordinance - Exposing Child to DV

5 CONSIDERATIONS AND REQUESTS

5.a. Shaw Road improvement project (23rd Ave SE to Manorwood)

5.b. Appointment of voting delegates for the 2017 AWC Annual Business Meeting. AWC Annual Business Meeting Letter 1

5.c. Zoning Options for Private Schools Staff Memo - Private School Zoning

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

COUNCIL REPORTS

MAYOR'S REPORT

EXECUTIVE SESSION

ADJOURNMENT

The City Council Chambers is wheelchair accessible. Those needing assistance with hearing devicesshould contact the City Clerk's Office (253-841-5480) the Friday preceding the meeting.

2

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Cindy HuffSubmitting Department: City Clerk's Office Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Minutes of May 9, 2017

Presenter:

Recommendation:

Background:

Council Direction:

Fiscal Impacts:

Attachments May 9, 2017 Draft Minutes

3

City of PuyallupCity Council Study Session

May 9, 2017

(These minutes are not verbatim. The meeting was recorded, and copies of the recording are retained for a period of six years from the date of the meeting and are available upon request.)

COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Hopkins, Deputy Mayor Palmer, Councilmember Door, Councilmember Shadko, Councilmember Swanson, Councilmember Johnson

Mayor Hopkins recognized the absence of Councilmember Farris as excused.

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

Council Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Shadko, second by Councilmember Johnson to amend the agenda by adding a Committee Report category and add an item prior to the Agenda Items entitled PCRC Regional Growth Center Criteria. The motion passed 6-0.

COMMITTEE REPORTS

PCRC Regional Growth Center Criteria

Senior Planner Katie Baker provided background information on Puget Sound Regional Council’s(PSRC) plans to update its Regional Growth Centers framework. She reviewed the recommendations from the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC), a stakeholder working group, and Pierce County’s Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC) and touched on several unanswered questions.

Deputy Mayor Palmer identified a need for a decision to be made between Alternatives A and Bcriteria standards. He felt the primary implication to Puyallup would be the funding it receives from the PSRC.

Councilmember Swanson believed Puyallup’s ranking in the tier system important and the lack of clear guidance on tier funding allocations problematic. Given King County’s dominance within the PSRC, he felt it better for Pierce County cities to unify and questioned if the city should band with Pierce County to help protect the Frederickson area and the Canyon Road corridor.

Mr. Yamamoto clarified the council’s three options, to select Alternate A, Alternate B, or oppose establishing criteria until such time the implications of what the criteria means is more fully understood.

Discussion centered on King County’s willingness to share the growth, a reluctance to vote until more information on the funding is provided, and a sense of a downgrade in Puyallup’s ranking. Mayor Hopkins recognized the appearance of some reluctance to commit on this issue and Councilmember Swanson clarified his intent to advocate for more clarity on the funding aspects.

4

Council Meeting Minutes May 9, 2017

2

AGENDA ITEMS

Department of Corrections Presentation – Community Supervision (Information only)

Department of Corrections employees Kristine Skipworth and Theresa Hinds outlined the scope of essential functions of the Community Corrections Officers (CCO) duties, touching on several statistics relating to number of employees, field offices, clientele, etc.

Ms. Skipworth and Ms. Hines responded to requests for clarification from councilmembers regarding several of the departments’ processes.

Informational presentation on Small Cell Wireless Facilities

Ogden Murphy Wallace representative Elana Zana defined what small cell technology is, explained how it is regulated, and spoke of the need to increase services to meet the demands of a growing population. She further touched on the consortium process, a need for consistent design standards and implementation of code and permit processes to better control the impacts to the right-of-way.

Ms. Zana responded to several questions from councilmembers regarding this technology.

Presentation by the Police Department’s Criminal Investigations Division relating to narcotics

Captain Ryan Portmann reported on the dangers of increased opioid abuse, touching on the following: state and local trends; drug statistics and national trends; the structure of the city’sCriminal Investigations Division; and the police department’s response to the epidemic. He further discussed the challenges and what can be done on a policy and law enforcement level to address the opioid epidemic.

Captain Portmann responded to several questions by council members regarding his report.

Council Action: At 8:27 p.m., a motion was made by Councilmember Door, second by Councilmember Shadko, to extend the meeting to 9:00 p.m. The motion passed 6-0.

Van Lierop Park Master Plan Design Presentation and Update

Parks and Recreation Director Sarah Harris gave an opening statement and introduced the consultant. She requested that council review the plans, identify their preference(s) of designs/amenities and choose one design or a melding of both plans.

MIG|Svg Architect Bryce Merriman introduced two conceptual designs, Puyallup Polders and Daffodil Hills. He discussed the concept behind each of the two designs, illustrated the layout of both parks and outlined the amenities that each design will offer.

5

Council Meeting Minutes May 9, 2017

3

Council Action: At 8:55 p.m., a motion was made by Councilmember Door, second by Councilmember Swanson, to extend the meeting to 9:30 p.m. The motion passed 6-0.

Councilmembers asked questions of Mr. Merriman and voiced their likes, dislikes, and concerns relating to many features of both designs. The council consensus leaned towards the Polders design and the need for it to be considered a community park. Many councilmembers acknowledged the possibility of future expansion and voiced a preference that the design selected be adaptable to change.

Council Action: At 9:30 p.m., a motion was made by Councilmember Swanson, second by Councilmember Door, to extend the meeting to 10:00 p.m. The motion passed 6-0.

CITIZEN COMMENTS

Mr. Bud Metzger opined on the Van Lierop Master Plan and of the need for there to be some open space. He also suggested implementing a small tax on opiates to provide for treatment facilities.

Ms. Ruth Perkins spoke on behalf of the running community, her dream of a non-school related community track and asked that some space be allocated within the proposed Van Lierop Park.

Motion for Property Sale

Council Action: A motion was made by Councilmember Shadko, second by Councilmember Door, to authorize and approve the sale of one parcel of real property owned by the City of Puyallup located at 821 2nd Avenue NE to Ruth Ray for $180,000 less the City’s share of closing and other costs and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents in a form as approved by the City Attorney to effectuate such sale. The motion passed 6-0.

ADJOURNMENT – 9:45 p.m.

6

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Mary WinterSubmitting Department: Human Resources Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:20-year Service Award Presentation to Cross Connection Specialist Mike Nelson

Presenter:Rob Andreotti

Recommendation:

Background:

Council Direction:

Fiscal Impacts:

Attachments

7

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Ted HillSubmitting Department: Capital Improvement Engineering Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Street Repair - Overlay 2017 Design Contract Award

Presenter:Mark Palmer

Recommendation:Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with KPG, PS, in the amount of $156,681.03 in a form assubstantially approved by the City Attorney.

Background:West Pioneer from 11th to 5th has been identified by the Streets Department for the overlay program for 2017.

Work includes reconstructing curb/gutter, sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, and the roadway using dense HMA pavement. The project will be designed to be phased out as necessary to fit budget limitations.

In January 2017, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was published soliciting proposals from consultants for theengineering design, bid document preparation, and construction management services if needed. Five (5) consultingfirms responded to the City's advertised RFQ A committee of four (4) staff members independently evaluated andranked the proposals, we then selected the consultant based on the scores since there was a clear overall pick. KPGwas the firm selected based on the scores from the RFQ process as the preferred consultant for the project.

Council Direction:On November 22, 2016 Council approved the City's 2017 budget which included funding for this project.

Fiscal Impacts:$156,681.03 to design for the improvement on West Pioneer from 11th to 5th

Attachments 2017 Street Repair Overlay Scope & Budget

8

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 1 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

City of Puyallup

2017 Street Repair Overlay

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

KPG

Scope of Work

April 2017

INTRODUCTION

A. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING:

The following Scope of Work outlines the effort required to develop Plans, Specifications, and Estimates

to complete removal/replacement of curbing with curb and gutter; and a grind/overlay. Minor drainage

improvements may be required. Sidewalk replacement will be included at locations where existing

sidewalk does not meet ADA requirements.

This Scope of Work includes full design of the improvement to W Pioneer between the intersections of

11th St SW and 5th St SW; and preparation of one set of Bid ready PS&E. It is understood that the project

may be separated into multiple bid schedules, constructed in stages or delayed until 2018 to accommodate

the City’s construction budget. Preparation of additional Bid packages will require a supplement to this

Scope of Work.

B. ASSUMPTIONS:

The following assumptions were made to establish a scope and budget for this project:

• Improvements will be as follows:

o Grind/Overlay full width of W Pioneer

o Replacement of existing curb with new curb/gutter

o ADA compliant curb ramps

o Minor storm drainage improvements

o Sidewalk replacement anticipated for approximately 1000 LF

o Spare conduit and junction boxes for City communications systems

• Infiltration testing will not be completed for porous sidewalks. Sidewalks will be designed per

CITY standards.

• The CONSULTANT will provide a truck mounted Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) for data

collection. The truck will travel the same direction as traffic, no transverse (cross section) data

will be collected. The truck will travel at posted speed and no right of way permit and/or traffic

control will be required.

• The CITY will provide existing potholing data for the CONSULTANT to review.

• Modifications to existing traffic signals and street lighting systems will not be required.

• City of Puyallup’s water department will replace some side connections within the project extents

and provide temporary restoration. The City will provide these locations to KPG to ensure

restoration is completed with this project.

9

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 2 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

• Right-of-way or easement acquisition will not be required.

• Right-of-way will not be delineated.

• Special Provisions will be developed based on the 2016 WSDOT Standard Provisions.

• Sewer, water, and franchise utility improvements are not part of this Scope of Work.

• Field survey will include topographic mapping for the entire project and approx. 20ft north/south

of W Pioneer on each side street.

• Plans will be developed using AutoCAD 2015 Civil 3D using KPG drafting standards.

• The City will be responsible for all permit fees.

• A Construction Stormwater General Permit will not be required.

• All improvements will be within the existing right-of-way.

• Existing curb alignment will remain unchanged.

The following Scope of Work includes the effort to complete the above described improvements.

SCOPE OF WORK

Task 1 – Project Management/Coordination/Administration This task covers the effort required to manage the contract and to ensure that the project meets the client’s

expectations for schedule, budget, and quality of product. This Scope of Work assumes a 4 Month

contract duration:

1.1 Provide project administrative services including:

• Preparation of monthly invoices

• Preparation of monthly progress reports including amount spent, and amount remaining for each

task

• Maintaining project files

• Record keeping and project closeout

1.2 Provide project management services including:

• Project staff management and coordination

• KPG design team coordination meetings

• Schedule and budget monitoring

1.3 Miscellaneous letters and phone calls

Products:

• Monthly invoices

• Monthly progress reports

• Meeting notes for Consultant/City Meeting

10

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 3 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

Task 2 – Field Walk with City Staff This task includes the effort to conduct a field walk with CITY staff to determine the specific

improvements for each block of the project.

2.1 The CONSULTANT shall prepare for attend one (1) field walk with City Staff. Assume two (2)

consultant staff for one (1) meeting. During the field walk, the following will be confirmed:

• Verify the project extents.

• Establish locations where curb and gutter will be removed and replaced.

• Establish locations where sidewalk will be removed and replaced.

This field walk will be conducted prior to field survey.

Products:

• Field notes and figure markups outlining project extents and curb and gutter/sidewalk/curb ramp

improvements.

Task 3 – Field Survey and Base Map This Task includes the effort to conduct field survey based on the improvement locations specified above.

Exact survey limits will be marked in the field and verified with the CITY prior to mapping.

3.1 Utility Location: As utility upgrades and replacements are not a part of this scope of work with the

exception of minor catch basin relocations, utility locates will be ordered through “one-call” for

private utilities and City for City utilities. Utilities will only be located and surveyed where utility

excavation is anticipated.

3.2 Survey Control, Field Survey, and Note Reduction: Establish horizontal and vertical control points

along the corridor and within the project limits described above. Basis of control will be Washington

State Plane South Zone, NAD 83/91 horizontal datum, NAVD 88 vertical datum. Control points will

be established and will be made available for the Contractor’s use during construction. The

CONSULTANT will locate, field survey, and calculate positions for all monuments and control

points throughout the project limits. Conventional or GPS surveying methods will be used on this

project. Monuments or corners to be located and field surveyed may include side street monuments

and property corners

Field mapping will include signs, mailboxes, fences, trees, curbs, sidewalks, utility poles, and other

surface features within the mapping area as describe above. Pipe inverts will be determined for storm

drainage only in areas where modifications will occur. Perform note reduction of the field survey

data.

Field survey surface feature (valves, manholes, catch basins, junction boxes, vaults). Irrigation

systems will not be included. The CONSULTANT will prepare a utility base map from this

information.

11

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 4 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

Mapping work to prepare 1”=20’ topographic base map and digital terrain model (DTM) in

AutoCAD format of the project within the limits described above. The base map will include features

within the mapping area as describe above. One-foot contours will be generated from the DTM.

Products:

• Electronic basemap showing surface features.

Assumptions:

• Pipe inverts will not be required for sanitary sewer structures.

• Basemap will be prepared with AutoCAD 2015 Civil 3D using KPG drafting standards.

• Property corners will not be located as part of this scope of work.

• Title reports will not be required.

• Neither right of way nor easement acquisition will be required.

Task 4 – Preliminary Design This Task includes preparation of a Preliminary Design (30%) Roll Plot and cost estimates.

4.1 Compile and review data and records from the CITY, other agencies, and utilities. Prepare photo log

of existing conditions.

4.2 The CONSULTANT shall prepare a 30% roll plot to establish project limits and approximate

locations of proposed improvements per the Field Walk with City Staff (Task 2). Layout will be

schematic and will include curb/gutter, sidewalk, approximate curb ramp and driveway layouts.

Notations and callouts will not be included in this layout.

4.3 The CONSULTANT shall prepare 30% quantities and opinion of probable cost for review and

approval by the CITY.

4.4 The CONSULTANT shall attend one (1) preliminary design workshop. Assume two (2) consultant

staff for one (1) meeting.

Products:

• One (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic PDF copy, 34” roll plot of the Preliminary Design.

• One (1) hard copy of quantities and opinion of probable cost.

• Meeting minutes from the concept workshop, one (1) electronic PDF copy.

Assumptions:

• One (1) alternative will be prepared for the 30% preliminary design scroll plot.

• Individual plan sheets will not be developed for the 30% preliminary design.

• Scroll plot will include survey and right of way basemaps.

• Improvements decided on during the concept workshop will be carried forward to 90% design.

12

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 5 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

Task 5 - Geotechnical Engineering This Task includes geotechnical investigation and recommendations necessary for traffic signal pole

foundations. See the attached Proposal from GeoDesign for Scope of Work and additional information.

5.1 KPG’s effort under this task includes review of reports and providing information such as plans,

figures, and details to the Geotechnical sub consultant as required to complete the geotechnical

investigation and report.

5.2 Order traffic counts and provide to GeoDesign for pavement design. Traffic counts will consist of

tube style counters and will report volume and vehicle classification. Assume three (3) days of data

at one location.

Products:

• Draft Geotechnical Report, One (1) electronic PDF copy of the report

• Final Geotechnical Report, One (1) electronic PDF copy of the report

Task 6 - 90% and Final Design

Prior to proceeding with 90% and Final design the City will determine the extents of the improvements

based on available funding. It is understood that the entire project limits may not be able to be constructed

due to funding limitations. The City may choose to delay construction and use two years construction

budget and complete all improvements under one contract. This Scope and Budget assumes that one set

of bid documents will be prepared.

The CONSULTANT shall provide 90% Design Plans, Specifications and Estimates for review and

approval by the CITY. Plans shall be formatted to provide sufficient detail for convenient field layout of

all proposed facilities. City standard details and WSDOT standard plans will be supplemented with

project specific details as necessary. The 90% plans and specifications shall be stamped by a licensed

professional Engineer in the State of Washington.

6.1 The CONSULTANT shall prepare 90% plan sheets for review and approval by the CITY. The 90%

submittal will include all comments received from the 30% preliminary design and will include

location of improvements with the following level of detail:

• Construction Limits

• Curb and radii

• Location and types of curb ramps

• Location and type of driveway approaches

• Channelization and signing

• Spare conduit for City communications system

• Utility impacts, required relocations and pothole locations

• Impact to private improvements both inside and outside of public right of way

13

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 6 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

The CONSULTANT will provide senior level QA/QC and constructability review by KPG

construction management staff prior to submitting to the CITY. The plans are estimated to have the

following sheets:

6.2 The CONSULTANT shall prepare 90% quantities and opinion of probable cost for review and

approval by the CITY.

6.3 The CONSULTANT shall prepare 90% specification documents including CITY provided legal

documents, Division 1 and City GSPs. The CONSULTANT will include additional special

provision language as needed.

6.4 The CONSULTANT shall attend a design review meeting to review CITY comments from the 90%

Design submittal. Assume two (2) Consultant staff for two (1) meetings. Plans will be submitted for

review 2 weeks prior to the meeting.

6.5 The CONSULTANT shall prepare Bid Document Plans, Project Manual (Specifications), and

opinion of probable cost. The CONSULTANT will provide Senior level QA/QC prior to submitting

to the CITY. The Bid Documents will include all comments received from the 90% Design Review.

Products:

• 90% Design Submittal

o Two (2) sets hard copy 1/2 Size Plan Sets (11x17), Specifications, & Estimate

• Bid Documents (Hard Copy and Electronic Bidding)

o One (1) set hard copy Construction Cost Estimate

o One (1) set hard copy Project Manual

o One (1) set hard copy 1/2 Size Plan Set (11x17)

o One (1) set hard copy Full Sized Plans (22x34 size)

o 1 Copy Electronic Cost Estimate, Drawings and Specifications

Assumptions:

Title Number

Cover Sheet 1

Legend, Abbreviations, General Notes 1

Sheet Index and Survey Control 1

Typical Sections 2

Typical Details 2

Site Preparation/TESC Plans 3

Roadway Plan/Profile 6

Curb Ramp Details 5

Channelization & Signing Plan/Plan 3

TOTAL 24

14

EXHIBIT A-1

City of Puyallup Page 7 of 7 KPG 17027

2017 Street Repair Overlay April 2017

W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

• This scope includes preparation of one set of PS&E. If the CITY elects to separate the project

into multiple phases, a supplement will be required to prepare additional sets of bid documents.

• Site specific Construction Staging/Traffic Control Plans will not be required.

• CITY will provide bidding services and reproduction of Contract Documents.

• Construction Services, if desired will be under a separate scope of work.

Task 7 - Assistance During Bidding 7.1 Prepare addenda and respond to bidders questions relayed through the CITY. It is assumed that the

CONSULTANT will prepare up to two (2) addenda.

Additional Services The CITY may require additional services of the CONSULTANT. The scope of these services will be

determined based on the unanticipated project needs or other considerations at the sole discretion of the

CITY. This work may include items identified in the current task authorizations as well other items,

which may include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:

♦ Structural Engineering

♦ Temporary Construction Easements

♦ Right of Way Acquisition Services

♦ Arborist Investigations

♦ Construction Management & Inspection Services

♦ As-Built Drawings

♦ Hazardous Materials Testing

These services will be authorized under a future contract supplement if necessary. At the time these

services are required, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed scope of work and an estimate of costs.

The CONSULTANT shall not proceed with the work until the CITY has authorized the work and issued a

notice to proceed.

15

HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE

Project: City of Puyallup

2017 Street Repair Overlay - W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

April 17, 2017

Hours Total FeeTask Description 197.00$ 103.41$ 108.24$ 75.05$ 104.70$ 126.30$ 150.00$ 112.77$ 126.63$ 77.33$

Task 1 - Project Management / Coordination / Administration

1.1 Administration Services (6 Months) 40 20 60 5,683.00$

1.2 Management Services 32 32 3,309.12$

1.3 Miscellaneous letters and phone calls 32 32 3,309.12$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details 80.25$

0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 124 12,381.49$

Task 2 - Field Walk with City Staff

2.1 Field walk with City Staff 8 16 24 8 56 6,665.92$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details -$

8 16 24 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 56 6,665.92$

Task 3 - Field Survey and Base Map3.1 Utility Locates (KPG coordination with City & One-Call) 2 8 10 1,217.22$

3.2 Field Survey & Basemapping 8 12 60 60 140 18,109.08$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details 107.00$

0 10 0 0 0 20 60 60 0 0 150 19,433.30$

Task 4 - Preliminary Design

4.1 Review Data & Photo Log 4 4 4 12 1,146.80$

4.2 30% Design Roll Plot 4 16 40 48 32 140 13,724.96$

4.3 30% Cost Estimate 8 8 8 24 2,293.60$

4.4 Preliminary Design Workshop 4 4 6 14 1,851.08$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details -$

8 32 58 60 32 0 0 0 0 0 190 19,016.44$

Task 5 - Geotechnical Engineering5.1 Engineering Analysis and Report (KPG Review) 2 8 10 1,221.28$ 5.2 Traffic Counts 4 4 413.64$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details 14,532.00$

2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 16,166.92$

Task 6 - 90% & Final Design6.1 90% Plans 18 28 140 188 114 0 0 0 8 0 496 48,653.32$

Cover 4Legend, Abbreviations, General Notes 4Sheet Index and Survey Control 6Typical Sections 4 4 16 24 8Typical Details 4 6 8 24 16Site Prep/TESC Plans 2 2 20 24 12Roadway Plan/Profile 4 6 40 56 12Curb Ramp Details 4 6 48 40 40Channelization & Signing Plan/Plan 4 8 20 12

6.2 90% Estimate 2 8 8 16 34 3,288.00$ 6.3 90% Specifications 16 40 16 20 92 10,566.84$ 6.4 90% Design Review Meeting 4 4 8 1,201.64$ 6.5 Bid Document PS&E 4 40 40 40 20 24 168 16,205.92$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details 0 -$

44 120 204 244 134 0 0 0 8 44 798 79,915.72$

Task Total

Task Total

QA/QC

Engineer

Labor Hour Estimate

Task Total

Task Totals

Task Total

Design

Engineer

Task Total

Survey

Technician

Senior

Surveyor

Construction

ManagerSurvey Crew Clerical

Project

Engineer

Project

Manager

CAD

Technician

City of Puyallup2017 Street Repair OverlayW Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SWHour and Fee Estimate

1 of 2 KPGApril 2017

16

HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE

Project: City of Puyallup

2017 Street Repair Overlay - W Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SW

April 17, 2017

Hours Total FeeTask Description 197.00$ 103.41$ 108.24$ 75.05$ 104.70$ 126.30$ 150.00$ 112.77$ 126.63$ 77.33$

QA/QC

Engineer

Labor Hour Estimate

Design

Engineer

Survey

Technician

Senior

Surveyor

Construction

ManagerSurvey Crew Clerical

Project

Engineer

Project

Manager

CAD

Technician

Task 7 - Assistance During Bidding7.1 Bidder Questions/Addenda (Assume 2 Addenda) 2 12 8 8 30 3,101.24$

Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details -$

2 12 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 3,101.24$

64 306 294 312 174 20 60 60 8 64 1,362 156,681.03$ TOTAL HOURS AND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE

Task Total

City of Puyallup2017 Street Repair OverlayW Pioneer between 11th St SW and 5th St SWHour and Fee Estimate

2 of 2 KPGApril 2017

17

2502 Jefferson Avenue l Tacoma, WA 98402 l 253.203.0095 www.geodesigninc.com

April 14, 2017 KPG, Inc. 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98121  

Attention: Terry Wright, P.E.

Proposal Pavement Engineering Services

W Pioneer Avenue Overlay Puyallup, Washington

GeoDesign Project: KPG-78-01 INTRODUCTION GeoDesign, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal for pavement engineering services for the W Pioneer Avenue Overlay Project in Puyallup, Washington. Our information is based on recent email and telephone communications. We understand the City of Puyallup (City) plans to restore the pavement along W Pioneer Avenue from approximately 5th Street SW to approximately 11th Street SW. We understand the City suspects the existing asphalt concrete (AC) is underlain by concrete pavement and desires to know the extent of the concrete and depth of AC over it. We also understand the roadway segment has reduced curb reveal due to past overlays and the City desires to increase it by lowering finished grade. Our pavement engineering services will consist of a pavement distress survey, ground penetrating radar (GPR) testing using truck-mounted equipment, limited falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, subsurface explorations, laboratory testing, pavement analysis, and pavement design recommendations for the segment of W Pioneer Avenue identified above. Our recommendations will include pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction options. We will coordinate our activities with KPG and appropriate City personnel regarding right-of-way (ROW) permitting, public notification, traffic control, and scheduling. SCOPE OF SERVICES The project includes pavement testing and explorations to assist us in providing pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction recommendations. We propose the following specific scope of services for this project:

18

2 KPG-78-01:041417

Complete a distress survey of the existing pavement, including logging the extent of cracking, rutting, and other distresses.

Complete traffic control plans for the proposed field work. Obtain ROW permits. We understand the City will waive any permit fees associated with

obtaining the permits to complete our field work. Obtain traffic information provided by the City. Provide traffic control during the subsurface explorations and FWD testing. Complete GPR testing in each direction within the project limits using a 2 GHz, truck-

mounted, horn antenna. Testing will be completed along the inside and outside wheel tracks of the travel lanes and along the pavement edge. In order for us to complete the testing along the pavement edge, we will need access to areas where parking is allowed. We assume the City will post no parking signs in these areas prior to and during the day of testing.

Conduct FWD tests in each travel lane with spacing at approximately 75- to 100-foot intervals between intersections. We estimate approximately 40 FWD tests.

Explore subsurface conditions in the existing pavement by completing up to four core borings to depths up to 4 feet below ground surface. A diagram of core locations will be provided to KPG and the City for review prior to

starting field explorations. Cores will be selected at visible crack locations wherever possible and practical. Cores on

cracks will be used to determine the depth of crack penetration at these locations. All core holes will be patched with EZ Street brand polymer-modified patch compound.

Maintain a detailed log of the explorations and collect samples of the pavement, base, and subgrade materials encountered.

Collect soil samples at select depths in the core explorations and complete laboratory tests on select samples. We estimate up to four moisture content determinations and up to one Atterberg limits test.

Compare the results of core sampling to the GPR data and adjust GPR results as appropriate. Analyze truck-mounted GPR data and provide a plot of estimated asphalt concrete thickness

and portland cement concrete thickness by pavement station. Evaluate back-calculated and laboratory data to determine pavement structure and subgrade

characteristics needed for design. Analyze traffic loadings based on information to be provided by the City. Evaluate rehabilitation options based on above-referenced information. Provide pavement structural designs for dig-out sections (if warranted). Provide recommendations for rehabilitation or reconstruction. Provide recommendations for materials and construction. Provide a draft report summarizing our recommendations. Provide a final report summarizing our recommendations and the recommendations of the

design team. SCHEDULE We will schedule our field work following your verbal indication that written authorization is in process. Depending somewhat on the time required for permits and scheduling the driller, our field services will be completed within approximately three to four weeks of your authorization.

19

3 KPG-78-01:041417

Our draft report will be completed approximately two to three weeks following completion of field explorations. Preliminary results can be provided as they develop. FEE We propose that our services be provided in accordance with the Schedule of Charges and General Conditions that are attached to and part of this proposal. We propose to complete the scope of services described on a time-and-materials basis for a not-to-exceed fee of $13,857. Subcontractor cost estimates are based on the assumption that our work will be performed during standard daylight hours with at least eight hours allowed in the ROW per day. A detailed summary of our expenditures is attached.

20

4 KPG-78-01:041417

We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please call if you have any questions regarding this submittal. To formally authorize our services, return a signed copy of this proposal. Sincerely, GeoDesign, Inc. Todd V. Scholz, Ph.D., P.E. (Oregon) Senior Associate Engineer Kevin J. Lamb, P.E. Principal Engineer TVS:KJL:rc

Attachments

One copy submitted (via email only)

Document ID: KPG-78-01-041417-geop.docx

© 2017 GeoDesign, Inc. All rights reserved.

The scope of services and terms described herein are accepted, and GeoDesign, Inc. is authorized to proceed. by Organization Signature* Date Name Printed Title *Individual with contracting authority and responsible for payment of GeoDesign, Inc.’s fees.

21

Project: KPG - City of Puyallup W Pioneer Street Overlay ProjectJob No. KPG-78-01 Date 4/14/2017

Standard Schedule (SS) or Direct Salary Cost (DSC) DSC Fixed Fee 30.00%Labor Rate Z- Direct Salary Cost (DSC)GeoDesign OH Rate, if DSC calculation is used 176.54% Include Laboratory Cost as Labor H NOIf Labor is DSC is the Fixed Fee = FF x (DSC+OH) ? NO If answered "YES" Enter Labor Division: Allowable Handling Charge 12.00% Senior Lab Tech 25%

Lab Technician I 75%

Total Hours Labor Rate Cost

CLASSIFICATION

1. Principal 1.5 2.0 3.5 $64.42 $2252. Senior Associate 3.0 22.0 25.0 $55.29 $1,3823. Associate $48.084. Senior Project Manager $45.005. Project Manager II $37.256. Project Manager I $32.937. Senior Technical Specialist $46.008. Technical Specialist II $39.009. Technical Specialist I 18.0 4.0 22.0 $32.45 $71410. Staff III $31.7311. Staff II $28.8412. Staff I $23.0713. Sr Tech $28.8514. CAD 3.0 3.0 $30.76 $9215. Tech II $20.0016. Tech I $18.7517. Senior Project Assistant 4.0 4.0 $27.26 $10918. Proj Assistant 0.5 2.0 2.5 $25.19 $6319. Support Staff 1.0 1.0 $21.77 $22

SUBTOTAL - Labor $859 $1,748 61.0 $2,608 $2,608

OVERHEAD (OH) COST (Including Salary Additives) 1,517 3,087 $4,604 4,604

FIXED FEE (FF):

= Fixed Fee x (DSC) or 30% x ($2,607.69)258 525 $782 782

SUBTOTAL LABOR $2,634 $5,360 $7,994 $7,994

EQUIPMENT

Field Investigation

Engineering Analysis and

ReportSubcontractors Unit Rate Extended

VEHICLE - GeoDesign - 1 3 Day $21.00 $63VEHICLE - Mileage 400 Mile $0.540 $216SAMPLING - GEO - MISC Sampling Equipment 1 Day $11.00 $11INSTRUMENT - GEO - FWD with GPR 0.5 Day $3,040.00 $1,520 - - - - SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT $1,810 $1,810 $1,810.00

REIMBURSABLES:

Field Investigation

Engineering Analysis and

ReportSubcontractors Unit Rate Extended

Reproduction - Copy (B&W) 100 each $0.12 $12.00Reproduction - Copy (COLOR) 11 x 17 10 $1.50 $15.00Permits each $300.00Per Diem 1 each $185.00 $185.00SUBTOTAL REIMBURSABLES $185 $27 $212 $212.00

LABORATORY TESTING:

Field Investigation

Engineering Analysis and

ReportSubcontractors Unit Rate Extended

Moisture - Oven 4 ea $25 $100Atterberg Limits (ASMT (D4318) 1 ea $163 $163 - - -SUBTOTAL LABORATORY $263 $263 $263.00

GeoDesign Charges SubTotal $4,892 $5,387 $10,279 $10,279

SUBCONTRACTORS (include tax when applicable)

Field Investigation

Engineering Analysis and

ReportSubcontractors SUBTOTAL HC Extended

Drilling Subcontractor $1,695 $1,695 $203 $1,898

Traffic Control Subcontractor $1,500 $1,500 $180 $1,680

SUBTOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS incl HC $3,578 $3,195 $383 $3,578.40$3,578

Field Investigation

Engineering Analysis and

ReportSubcontractors

ACTUAL SUBTOTAL BY PHASE incl HC $4,892 $5,387 $3,578 $13,857.00ROUNDED UP SUBTOTAL BY PHASE incl HC $4,900 $5,390 $3,580 $13,870

TOTAL - ESTIMATED FEE $13,857.00

GeoDesign, Inc. FEE SUMMARY

SCOPE: Geotechnical Pavement Study -- FWD with GPR, pavement distress survey, and pavement cores for 2,600 lineal feet of roadway (1-day total). Report with rehabilitation and/or reconstruction recommendations.

PROJECT PHASES OR TASKS

Field Investigation

Engineering Analysis and

ReportSubcontractors

GEODESIGN LABOR - Summary from Geodesign Hours Worksheet

22

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Katie OrtegaSubmitting Department: Human Resources Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Authorization to Execute the Puyallup Police Association 2016-2018 Collective Bargaining Agreement

Presenter:

Recommendation:Authorize the City Manager to execute the 2016-2018 City of Puyallup and Puyallup Police Association collectivebargaining agreement (CBA) in a form as approved by the City Attorney.

Background:The City began negotiations with the Puyallup Police Association in December 2015 and reached a tentative agreementon February 2, 2017. This agreement was presented to City Council in executive session on March 21, 2017. Thepreceding bargaining agreement expired on December 31, 2015. The proposed PPA collective bargaining successoragreement is for three years (2016-2018) and includes:

1. Pay Increases2016: COLA increase of 1%, plus a market adjustment of 1%2017: 100% of the CPI-U, Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton first half index, 1% minimum 5% maximum (2.2%)2018: 100% of the CPI-U, Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton first half index, 1% minimum 5% maximum

2. Labor Day Weekend Fair OT Double TimeEmployees that are assigned or volunteer to work OT Fair shifts on the Friday, Saturday or Sunday of Labor Dayweekend shall receive double time pay.

3. Elimination of “Green Time” As of ratification of this agreement, green time will be eliminated and replaced with a patrol shift premium of 5.77% forthose patrol officers working 12 hour shifts.

Council Direction:

Fiscal Impacts:

Attachments

23

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Virginia LorberauSubmitting Department: Capital Improvement Engineering Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Contract Award: Reservoir Roof Vent Replacement

Presenter:Rob Andreotti

Recommendation:Approve and award a contract in the amount of $92,000.00 plus applicable 9.9% sales tax to T. Bailey, Inc. the lowestresponsive and responsible bidder.

Background:Replace existing roof vents on five water reservoirs within the City of Puyallup with security vents and vent risers to becapable of tie-off point anchorage for City maintenance personnel.

Three bids were received via the competitive bidding process, of those T. Bailey Inc. was the lowest responsive andresponsible contractor.

Council Direction:Award a contract in the amount of $92,000.00 plus applicable 9.9% sales tax to T. Bailey, Inc. the lowest responsiveand responsible bidder for the construction of the aforementioned project.

Fiscal Impacts:$101,108.000

Attachments Bid Tab Reservoir Vent Replacement

24

CITY OF PUYALLUP

BID TAB

RESEVOIR VENT REPLACEMENT

05/02/17

ITEM UNITEST

QTYDESCRIPTION

UNIT PRICE COST UNIT PRICE COST UNIT PRICE COST UNIT PRICE COST

1 LS 1 Mobilization 6,750.00$ 6,750.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 4,900.00$ 4,900.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 LS 5 Roof Vent 15,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 17,500.00$ 87,500.00$ 18,620.00$ 93,100.00$ 20,000.00$ 100,000.00$

SUBTOTAL 81,750.00$ 92,000.00$ 98,000.00$ 110,000.00$

TAX 9.9% 8,093.25$ 9,108.00$ 9,702.00$ 10,890.00$

TOTAL 89,843.25$ 101,108.00$ 107,702.00$ 120,890.00$

All bids contained the incorrect

tax. Current tax is 9.9%

T Bailey, Inc. CBI Services, LLC Combined ConstructionENGINEER's ESTIMATE

25

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Joe BeckSubmitting Department: Legal Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:First reading of an ordinance making it a crime to expose children to domestic violence

Presenter:Joseph Beck, City Attorney

Recommendation:Approve first reading of an ordinance adopting new code section PMC 9A.02.065 thereby making it a crime to exposea minor child to domestic violence.

Background:This domestic violence ordinance is being proposed to update and enhance the City’s criminal justice/prosecution ofdomestic violence in order to enhance criminal justice response via a separate offense and minimum mandatory jail time(30 days) for domestic violence committed in the presence of minor children. Domestic violence incidents committed inthe presence of minor children can result in physical, mental and emotional risk to children as well as life-long adversepsychological and other adverse impacts on those children. Through this ordinance the City Council will send a messagethat the City of Puyallup does not tolerate domestic violence, especially domestic violence committed in the presence ofminor children. Furthermore, city staff believes that this ordinance will reduce the impact of domestic violence incidentson all victims and witnesses, including minor children who are present when a domestic violence crime is committed.

Council Direction:Approve first reading of an ordinance adopting PMC 9A.02.065 thereby making it a crime to expose a minor child todomestic violence.

Fiscal Impacts:Unknown at this time.

Attachments Ordinance - Exposing Child to DV

26

Ordinance No. _____ Page 1

ORDINANCE NO. ________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON ADOPTING SECTION 9A.02.065 OF THE PUYALLUP MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE CRIME OF EXPOSING MINOR CHILD TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Puyallup recognizes that domestic

violence incidents committed in the presence of minor children can result in not only risk to the children but life-long adverse psychological and other adverse impacts on those children; and

WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to send a message that the City of Puyallup does not tolerate domestic violence, especially domestic violence committed in the presence of minor children; and

WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to reduce the impact of domestic violence

incidents on all victims and witnesses, including minor children who are present when committed;

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Puyallup do ordain as follows:

Section 1. Enactment. A new Section PMC 9A.02.065 entitled, “Exposing Minor Child to Domestic Violence” is created to read as follows:

1) A person commits the crime of exposing children to domestic violence when he or she

a) Commits a crime against a family or household member, as defined in RCW 10.99.020 and

b) The crime is committed in the immediate presence of, or is witnessed by, the suspect’s or the victim’s minor child, stepchild, foster child, or a minor child residing within the household or in the custody or care of the suspect or victim. For the purposes of this section, “witnessed” shall mean if the crime is seen or directly perceived in any other manner by the child.

2) Exposing children to domestic violence is a gross misdemeanor. Any person convicted of this crime shall be punished by imprisonment of not less than 30 days.

27

Ordinance No. _____ Page 2

Section 2. Severability. All sections in this ordinance are hereby deemed severable. Any section found invalid or unconstitutional by a court of law with jurisdiction shall not be deemed to invalidate or find unconstitutional other sections in this ordinance.

Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk is authorized to make necessary corrections

to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener’s/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.

Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective five days after

publication in the official newspaper of the City of Puyallup.

Passed and approved by City Council of the City of Puyallup at regularly scheduled open public meeting on the day of , 2017. John Hopkins Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Joseph N. Beck Mary Winter City Attorney City Clerk Published: Effective:

28

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Mark PalmerSubmitting Department: Capital Improvement Engineering Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Shaw Road improvement project (23rd Ave SE to Manorwood)

Presenter:City staff

Recommendation:

Background:City staff will provide a status update on the Shaw Road improvement project. The update will primarily cover threeproject topics: budget, design, and timeline.

Council Direction:

Fiscal Impacts:

Attachments

29

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Jessica JohnsonSubmitting Department: City Manager's Office Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Appointment of voting delegates for the 2017 AWC Annual Business Meeting.

Presenter:City Manager, Kevin Yamamoto

Recommendation:Select and appoint up to three (3) voting delegates to attend the 2017 AWC Annual Business Meeting on June 22,2017.

Background:AWC's Annual Business Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 22, 2017 in Vancouver Washington. AWC bylawsallow each city to appoint up to three (3) voting delegates, each having one (1) vote. Voting delegates have theopportunity to influence the operations of AWC as follows: - Electing the members of the AWC Board of Directors - Voting on amendments to the AWC bylaws - Considering floor amendments to the Statement of Policy. (AWC's Statement of Policy is updated at least everysix years and provides the basis for policy recommendations by AWC's Legislative Priorities Committee, the Board and staff.)The deadline to submit voting delegates to AWC is Thursday, June 15, 2017.

Council Direction:

Fiscal Impacts:

Attachments AWC Annual Business Meeting Letter

30

31

City Council Agenda Item Report

Submitted by: Kendall WalsSubmitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: June 6, 2017

Subject:Zoning Options for Private Schools

Presenter:Rachael Brown

Recommendation:Staff is seeking City Council direction on zoning options for the permitting of private schools, which was recentlyreviewed by the Planning Commission . No formal action is being requested at this time.

Background:In late 2015, City Council considered a Comprehensive Plan/zoning map amendment rezone from Cascade ChristianSchools for their property located at 903 25th St SE. The request was to change the map designation/zone from thecurrent single-family residential to business commercial. City Council did not approve the amendment request at thattime, but staff was directed to work further with the Planning Commission on recommendations for addressing thepermitting of private schools, potentially in a new “Institutional” zone.

As outlined more fully in the attached staff memo, the Planning Commission subsequently reviewed this item at multiplemeetings in 2016-17. Primary options considered included either integrating private schools into the existing PublicFacilities (PF) zone or creating a new “Institutional” zone, both of which would have corresponding ComprehensivePlan changes. At its public hearing on this item, the Planning Commission considered both options, but ended-uprecommending that no changes be made to the existing code in this regard.

Because it involves possible Comp. Plan text revisions, any formal Council action on this item can only occur during theannual Comp. Plan amendment cycle, slated for this September. Therefore, on June 14, 2017, staff is providing CityCouncil this background information and seeking any City Council direction on how you would like this matter to bebrought back for your formal ordinance action in September.

Council Direction:Staff is seeking City Council direction on the zoning options for the permitting of private schools, which was recentlyreviewed by the Planning Commission. No formal action is being requested at this time.

Fiscal Impacts:N/A

Attachments Staff Memo - Private School Zoning

32

CITY OF PUYALLUP Development Services333 South MeridianPuyallup WA 98371

City Council Staff Report 1June 6, 2017

To: City Council

From: Rachael Brown, Assistant Planner

Re: Private Schools & Institutional Zoning – City Council meeting of June 6, 2017

Date: May 25, 2017

On June 14, 2017, staff will present to City Council the Planning Commission findings on “Institutional Zoning”. As outlined below, this pertains to how private school uses are to be addressed in the City’s Zoning Code. Because this item involves potential amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, City Council can only consider such an amendment once per year, which is scheduled for this September. The intent of this June 14th briefing is to inform City Council about the Planning Commission’s recent work/recommendation on this project and to receive input from Council regarding how you would like this matter to be brought back for formal ordinance action in September.

In late 2015, City Council considered a Comprehensive Plan/zoning map amendment rezone from Cascade Christian Schools (CCS) for a 9.1-acre property at 903 25th St SE. That request was to change the map designation/zone from the current Single-Family Residential to Business Commercial. CCS contended that the change would allow a future private school use to be permitted by right on the property, whereas a private school would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the current residential zone. This led to Council discussion about private schools having to obtain a CUP in a residential zone, whereby a comparable public school is permitted by right due to those sites being located within the Public Facilities (PF) zone, which is not an option for private schools due to its public use intent. While City Council did not approve the CCS map amendment request then, staff was directed to work with the Planning Commission to address the zoning of private schools, possibly including a new “Institutional” zone.

PLANNING COMMISSION OPTIONS CONSIDERED

The Planning Commission subsequently reviewed this item at multiple meetings in 2016-17. During that time, Planning staff and the Commission reviewed options for permitting private schools, involving both the zoning code and corresponding Comp. Plan changes. During this time, the Commission focused principally on two key options:

OPTION 1 – ALLOW PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN THE “PF” DESIGNATION/ZONE

Option 1 creates an exception for private schools (K-12 or college) to be an allowable use within the existing Public Facilities Comp. Plan Designation and Zone District, which otherwise only permits publicly-owned uses. In addition to necessary zoning (PMC Sec. 20.44) and related code changes, this option would also involve a text amendment to the Comp. Plan Land Use Element. Private high schools and colleges would be subject to the same CUP/Master Plan requirement as their public counterparts.

33

City Council Staff Report 2June 6, 2017

OPTION 2 – ALLOW PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN A NEW INSTITUTIONAL ZONE

Option 2 creates a new Institutional Facilities (IF) zone district, within which certain community-serving private uses such as private schools and private cemeteries would be allowed. This new IF zone would come under the same Comp. Plan designation as the corresponding PF zone. Like Option 1, this option would also involve a text amendment to the Comp. Plan as well as zoning code revisions.

PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION

During their deliberations, the Planning Commission considered a number of factors, including:

How private schools fit into the governmental purpose intent of the PF designation/zone. Available zone districts/sites around the City in which to site private schools vs. public schools. The extent of public involvement and notice provided by public and private schools, respectively,

in their facility planning. How to address facilities that house both churches and schools, given that churches are not

currently allowed in PF. Representatives of three Puyallup-based private schools (CCS, All Saints, and NW Christian)

addressed the Planning Commission during the course of work on this topic. CCS and NW Christian expressed a preference for Option 1 (allow private schools in PF). All Saints questioned how either option would work if a church and a school occupy the same site, as churches were not being viewed as a permitted use in either the PF or a new Institutional zone district (NOTE: the majority of Commissioners did not support churches being permitted within the PF zone, even if private schools were permitted there).

On February 22, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item. Two motions were made that night:

1. Recommend to City Council approval of Option #1 (i.e. allow private schools within the existing PF zone), with associated amendments to the Comp. Plan Land Use Element (clarifying that private schools would be an “exception” to the public sector purpose of the PF designation/zone) and related zoning code revisions. FAILED, 3-4

2. Recommend to City Council that no change be made to the Zoning Code or Comprehensive Plan, thus retaining the current system for siting and permitting private schools. PASSED, 5-2

In recommending “no action”, there were some Commissioner comments stating that they did not see sufficient need for a new zoning allowance for this use as they felt the current framework provided adequate opportunity for the permitting of private schools.

Staff requests City Council input as to how you would like this item brought back before you for formal ordinance action later this year, within the ‘17 Comp. Plan amendment cycle.

34