7/24/2019 Chitosan Coating Effect on Storability and Quality of Fresh Strawberries
1/3
Chitosan Coating Effect on Storability and Quality
of Fresh Strawberries
AHMED EL GHAOUTH, JOSE PH AWL, RATHY PONNAMPALAM, and MARCEL BOULET
-
ABSTRACT
The effect of chitosan coating (1.0 and 1.5% w/v) in controlling decay
of strawberries at 13C was investigated as compared to a fungicide,
iprodione (Rovralm). Chitosan coating significantly reduced decay of
berries (PsO.05) compared to the control. There was no significant
difference between chitosan and fungicide treatments up to 21 days
storage. Thereafter, Rovrala-t reated berries decayed at a higher rate
than chitosan-coated berries. Chitosan-coated berries stored at 4C
were firmer, higher in titratable acidity, and synthesized anthocyanin
at a slower rate than Rovrala-treated or nontreated berries. Chitosan
coating decreased espiration rate of the berries with a greater effect
at higher concentration.
INTRODUCTION
STRAWBERRY FRUIT (Fragatiu ananussu) is highly per-
ishable and its storage ife is often terminated by fungal infec-
tion causedby Botrytis cinereu and Rhizopus sp. (Maas, 1981).
The most prevalent method of maintaining quality and con-
trolling decay of st rawberries is by rapid cooling after harvest
and storage at low temperatures, typically 1C with high hu-
midity. Since effective control of temperature during transit
and storage of strawberries is difficult, other means of pres-
ervation have been sought. Because strawberries can tolerate
elevated CO, atmosphere, they are transported in pallet-bags
under high COZ (Bell, 1986). Although high CO* controls de-
cay (El Kazzaz et al., 1983), prolonged exposure to CO1 can
cause development of off-fl avors (Woodward and Topping,
1972).
Postharvest decay of strawberries can also be controlled by
application of fungicides (Jordan, 1973; Aharani and Barkai-
Golan, 1987). However, fungicides leave residues and the
number of fungicide-tolerant postharvest pathogens s growing
(Spotts and Cervantes, 1986). Thus, efforts have been made
to replace fungicides by natural products or to intensify natural
defensesof the tissue to control decay and prolong storage ife
(Adikaram et al., 1988; Boulet et al., 1989).
Recently, semi-permeable coatings have been advanced to
improve storability of perishable crops (Lowing and Cutts,
1982). Application of a blend of sucrose esters
of fatty acids and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose) to bananas
delayed ripening by modifying the internal atmospheres Banks,
1984). Delay of ripening was also reported in pears and apples
coated with c
7/24/2019 Chitosan Coating Effect on Storability and Quality of Fresh Strawberries
2/3
60-
Time ( days )
Fig. 1 Effect of chitosan coating, 1.0% (o), 1.5% (o), and RovraP
(iprodione) treatment @) on the decay control of strawberries
stored at 13C compa red to the control (water-treated) berries
e). Mean s of four replicates. Vertical bars represent LSD at 5%
level among treatments.
Quality attributes
The effect of chitosan coating and Rovrale on quality was assesse d
separatelywith non-inoculatedberries. They were dipped in Rovral@
suspension 100 ug/mL) or in chitosan solutions (1.0 a nd 1.5% w/v)
or in water control and stored at 4C as described. All treatments
contained0.1% Tween 80. Each treatment had 4 replicates, and each
replicate consistedof 70 berries. Quality of the berries was assesse d
eachweek. A sampleof 15-20 berries n total was randomly removed
from each reatment and analyzed or firmness, titratable acidity and
anthocyanincontent. To determine firmness, the berries were sliced
into halves and each half was punch tested. The penetration force
(Newton) of the flesh was measuredwith an Instron Universal Testing
Machine (Model 1101, Instron Corp., Canton, MA) using a 4 mm
flat plunger (Holt, 1970). Titratable acidity was expressedas mg of
citric acid/100mL. Acidity was determinedusing 10 g aliquot of puree
in 40 mL deionized water and titrating with 0.1 N NaOH to an end-
point of pH 8.1. Anthocyanins were extractedwith acidified ethanol
from a 2 g aliquot of a homogenateof 7 berries, according to t he
method of Fuleki an d Francis (1968). Anthocyanin content was ex-
pressedas mg anthocyanin/lOOg trawberry homogenate.The quality
evaluation data were subjected o Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
Respiration
The respiration rate of strawberriesat 4C was determinedby plac-
ing them (120 g) in an air tight container (1.35-L) for 2 to 4 hr. Then
a 5 mL gassamplewas withdrawn with a gas ight hypodermic syringe
and analyzed or CO* using a gas chromatograph equipped with a
TCD detector and a Poropak N Column. Four replicatesof each reat-
ment were analyzed.
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Antifungal effect of chitosan coating and RovraP
Decay of strawberries was reduced significantly (P~0.05)
when inoculated-berrieswere either coated with chitosan or
dipped in Rovral@ Fig. 1). The early signs of m old develop-
ment in the strawberries, regardlessof the treatment, appeared
after 8 day s storage at 13C. After 21 day s at 13C, the per-
centages f decayed-berriesn c hitosan-coated 1.0 a nd 1.5%
w/v) and Rovral@-treated ere 11, 10 and 13% respectively,
while in t he control it w as 52%. Ther e was no significant
difference betweenchitosan and Rovral@reatment n control-
ling decay before 21 d storage. Thereafter, however, the Ro-
vral@-treated berries decayed at a slightly higher rate than the
chitosan-coated erries suggesting he active ingredient of the
fungicide could have been inactivated by the host. Further-
more, Rovral@-treated erries showed symptoms of phytotox-
6
2
1
0
7
14
21 26
35
TIME (days)
Fig. a-Textur e (A) and Titratable acidity (B) of control lb), Ro-
vral@-treated P), l.O%, (0) and 1 .5% (0) chitosan-co ated straw-
berries stored at 4C. Vertical bars represent SE values.
icity characteriz ed y formation of water-soakedareas.At the
end of storage 29 days), decayedberries n control was about
82% a nd in Rovrala treatment 33%. In contrast, the level of
decay in 1.0 and 1.5% chitosan-coatedberries was 22 and
19%, respectively. There was no addedbenefit to decay con-
trol by increasingconcentrationof chitosan rom 1.0 to 1.5%.
Chitosan has he capacity to inhibit growth of several ungi,
to i nduce chitinase, and to elicit phytoalexins n the host tis-
sues. Thus, the control of decay n strawberries could be at-
tributed to either the fungistatic property of chitosan per se or
to its ability to induce defenseenzyme s i.e. chitinase and p-
1,3-glucanase)and phytoalexins in plants or a combination.
Whatever the mode of action, chit osan proved more effective
than Rovral@ n controlling decay of strawberries at 13C.
Effect on quality attributes
Chitosan coating had a beneficial effect on flesh firmness,
titratable acidity and retarding synthesis of anthocyanin of
strawberries stored at 4C (Fig. 2 and 3). Those coated with
chitosan (1.0 and 1.5%), after 31 d were firmer and higher in
titratable acidity than the control or Rovral@-treated erries
(Fig. 2). Increasing chitosan concentration did not result in
any increase n retention of firmness or modif y titratable acid-
ity. Rovral@reatment was effective in controlling decay , but
did not i mprove firmness or acidity as compared o the control.
Chitosan coating delayed rate of ripening a s indicated by
anthocyanincontent (Fig. 3). Th e total anthocyani ncontent of
chitosan-coatedberries was the least amon g the treatments,
after 31 days storage. In addition, t he anthocyanin content of
Rovral-treated berries was greater than that of the control.
Volume 56, No. 6, 1991-JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-1619
7/24/2019 Chitosan Coating Effect on Storability and Quality of Fresh Strawberries
3/3
CHITOSAN COATING OF STRAWBERRIES. , . .
HITOSAN COATING OF STRAWBERRIES. , . .
35 -5
I
m
3030 -
c
g 2525
5 20-0-
E
s 15-5-
.EE
5 lo-lo-
lzz
E 5--
a
v I
5
lb 1; 2b 2; 3b 3; 4'0 4;
Days in storage
Fig. 3-Anthocyanin content of control @), RovraP-treated @),
1.0% (0) and 1.5% (e) chitosan-coatedstrawberries stored at 4C.
Vertical bars represent SE values.
13
I
AZ
. 11
y
ii g
V
c
.o
5
5
t
7
cu
8
5
0
I I I I I I 1
2 4 6 6 10 12 14 16
Days in storage
Fig. 4-CO, production of control @), 1.0% (0) and 1.5% (a) chi-
tosan-coated strawberries stored at 4C. Vertical bars represent
SE values.
This suggested hat RovraP treatment may have stimulated the
ripening process. On the contrary, chitosan-coated berries syn-
thesized anthocyanin at a slower rate, and coating neither af-
fected appearance nor caused apparent phytotoxicity.
Furthermore, chitosan-coated berries developed the full red
color after 35 days storage. Retention of firmness, higher ti-
tratable acidity and slower rates of anthocyanin production in
coated berries demonstrated that chitosan coating slowed down
metabolism and prolonged the storage life. Coating fruits with
semi-permeable film has generally been shown to retard rip-
ening by modifying the endogenous CO*, O2 and ethylene
levels of fruits (Lowings and Cutts, 1982). However, speci fic
instances of interference with normal fruit ripening have been
reported with