ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 305 of 323 ChinaX Course Notes – Modern History I transmit, I do not innovate. 216 If you copy this document, please do not remove this disclaimer These are the class notes of Dave Pomerantz, a student in the HarvardX/EdX MOOC course entitled ChinaX. My ChinaX id is simply DavePomerantz. First, a very big thank you to Professors Peter Bol and Bill Kirby and Mark Elliot and Roderick MacFarquhar, to the visiting lecturers who appear in the videos and to the ChinaX staff for assembling such a marvelous course. The notes may contain copyrighted material from the ChinaX course. Any inaccuracies are purely my own. Where material from Wikipedia is copied directly into this document, a link is provided. See here. I strongly encourage you to download the PDF file with the notes for the entire course. Sections do not stand alone. Each one refers many times to the others with page numbers and footnotes, helping to connect many of the recurring themes in Chinese history. 216 The Analects 7.1. See page 35.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 305 of 323
ChinaX Course Notes – Modern History I transmit, I do not innovate.216
If you copy this document, please do not remove this disclaimer
These are the class notes of Dave Pomerantz, a student in the HarvardX/EdX MOOC course entitled ChinaX. My
ChinaX id is simply DavePomerantz.
First, a very big thank you to Professors Peter Bol and Bill Kirby and Mark Elliot and Roderick MacFarquhar, to the
visiting lecturers who appear in the videos and to the ChinaX staff for assembling such a marvelous course.
The notes may contain copyrighted material from the ChinaX course. Any inaccuracies are purely my own.
Where material from Wikipedia is copied directly into this document, a link is provided. See here.
I strongly encourage you to download the PDF file with the notes for the entire course. Sections do not stand
alone. Each one refers many times to the others with page numbers and footnotes, helping to connect many
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 313 of 323
or the Kuomintang. Some uttered the heresy that per capita availability of food on Taiwan exceeded that on the
mainland.
Why open the CCP to criticism at all? Perhaps Mao wanted to identify the disloyal. Perhaps the party was taken in
by its own rhetoric and was surprised to find that others were not.
Mao may have hoped for loyal disagreement in the style of the Confucian scholar-official, undermining bureaucratic
caution in the Party. But he did not expect open disloyalty in the style of a Western free press.
The period of open disagreement lasted five weeks before it was shut down with an anti-rightist campaign.
Hundreds of thousands of intellectuals were “sent down to the countryside” to embrace the masses, as Mao led
China through another campaign, this time anti-intellectual, the Great Leap Forward.225
40: Cultural Revolution Professor Roderick MacFarquhar
Setting the Stage for Revolution The Cultural Revolution is rarely talked about in China, thought it was a ten-year period of killing and chaos that ran
from May 1966 to October 1976. To be clear, this was primarily a period of devastation for the Party; for the people
of China, the greatest modern period of devastation was the Great Famine from 1959 to 1962, during which 30 or 40
million died.
The Cultural Revolution and the Great Famine were both initiated and led by Mao. Why, in 1966, did the founder
of the most highly organized state in the Communist world want to tear it all down?
The impetus for the Cultural Revolution began in the period following the Great Famine, when other party members
wanted to introduce incentives to spur recovery. Mao called these people revisionists, that they would challenge
Communist doctrine.
The Soviets, Lenin and Stalin, created the model that China followed. But the Soviet leaders of the late 50s, in their
attempts to appease the U.S., were deserting China: not pressing to include them in the U.N. and abandoning the war
between capitalism and socialism.
225 From Wikipedia
The Great Leap Forward of the People's Republic of China (PRC) was an economic and social campaign by the
Communist Party of China (CPC) from 1958 to 1961. The campaign was led by Mao Zedong and aimed to
rapidly transform the country from an agrarian economy into a communist society through rapid industrialization
and collectivization. The campaign caused the Great Chinese Famine.
Chief changes in the lives of rural Chinese included the introduction of a mandatory process of agricultural
collectivization, which was introduced incrementally. Private farming was prohibited, and those engaged in it
were labeled as counter-revolutionaries and persecuted. Restrictions on rural people were enforced through
public struggle sessions, and social pressure, although people also experienced forced labor. Rural
industrialization, officially a priority of the campaign, saw "its development ... aborted by the mistakes of the
Great Leap Forward."
The Great Leap ended in catastrophe, resulting in tens of millions of deaths. Estimates of the death toll range
from 18 million to 45 million, with estimates by demographic specialists ranging from 18 million to 32.5 million.
Historian Frank Dikötter asserts that "coercion, terror, and systematic violence were the very foundation of the
Great Leap Forward" and it "motivated one of the most deadly mass killings of human history".
The years of the Great Leap Forward in fact saw economic regression, with 1958 through 1962 being the only
period between 1953 and 1985 in which China's economy shrank. Political economist Dwight Perkins argues,
"enormous amounts of investment produced only modest increases in production or none at all. ... In short, the
Great Leap was a very expensive disaster."
In subsequent conferences in March 1960 and May 1962, the negative effects of the Great Leap Forward were
studied by the CPC, and Mao was criticized in the party conferences. Moderate Party members like Liu Shaoqi
and Deng Xiaoping rose to power, and Mao was marginalized within the party, leading him to initiate the
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 315 of 323
After two years, Mao decided the violence had gone on long enough, that continuing would risk alienating the PLA.
He sent Work Teams to calm the students, just as Liu Shaoqi had done a few years before to his ruin, only this time
the Work Teams were called Mao Zedong Thought Propaganda Teams. Some Red Guard students who failed to see
the difference, attacked Mao’s work teams, killing five members.
In July of 1968, Mao confronted the students and told them that their Red Guard had let them down, that they lacked
the maturity to run China. His experiment in nurturing successors by inciting revolution had failed and all he’d done
was disrupt his own party (and killed a lot of people, but was that really a concern?).
So he sent twelve million students from the campuses to the countryside and the factories to live among the peasants
and workers. There they would learn the wisdom of the people.
During these early years of the Cultural Revolution, the PLA had largely taken control in order to keep the students
in check. This left the leadership of most of the provinces in the hands of generals and colonels which was not what
Mao had ever envisioned – in fact the opposite of his philosophy of party control of the military.
Lin Biao’s Demise In 1969, Mao held a Party Congress to appoint Lin Biao his heir apparent. At this point, Mao wanted to reassert the
primacy of the party over the military.
Meanwhile, in a border skirmish the Soviets had demonstrated their military superiority over the Chinese. With the
Soviets and Mao having established their different philosophies, Mao feared a surprise attack. He was well aware
that the recent Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia demonstrated their intolerance of non-Soviet interpretations of
Communism.
Mao ordered the leaders of the party to spread out away from Beijing so they could survive an attack on the capital.
Reacting to Mao in his role as Defense Minister, but without Mao’s approval, Lin Biao moved millions of men and
materiél to positions of greater safety. The movements were so significant that the U.S. and the Soviets detected it.
Mao was enraged and responded with a campaign against Lin Biao, which resulted in Lin’s son being accused of
conspiring to assassinate Mao. Lin Biao fled with his family in a plane that crashed in Mongolia. Though it’s
difficult to sort fact from Party fiction, it appears the charges were trumped-up. If not, Mao was a fool for having
trusted this Brutus sufficiently to declare him his heir apparent.
In February of 1972, when Nixon came to China, Mao suggested that the reason Lin was a traitor was his opposition
to talks with the United States.
So if Mao was in favor of talking to Nixon, what exactly did he stand for? Adherence to Communist doctrine and
opposition to the Capitalist enemies? Opposition to the Soviets? Opposition to military control of the Party?
Incitement of student revolution? Or was it simply one man’s quest for power?
Discussion: How would you characterize the Sino-US Rapprochement? What roles did ideology and realpolitik play
in Mao’s decisions during the Cultural Revolution?
My thoughts: Ideology played an enormous role in Mao's vision of China, but the specter of the Opium Wars and of
the Japanese invasion could never have been far from his mind. As evil as Capitalism was for Mao, the U.S. had
already proven itself a stout military ally.
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 316 of 323
Life and Death in Shanghai by Nien Cheng
Why was the author placed in this terrible state of solitary confinement?
To increase the emotional pressure of isolation and helplessness to eventually force a confession. The
confession could then be used against her and as propaganda for the state and to force her to betray others
who could also be imprisoned.
Based on what you have read, how does the system of crime and punishment work during the Cultural
Revolution?
Crime is defined by the hierarchy of the state; the interpretation of Mao’s writings to suit each official as
they carry out the orders down the chain of command.
How do you prove someone's innocence?
If you’re in prison, you’re not innocent, by definition.
Who was in charge of the prison? What does this fact tell us about the participants of the Cultural
Revolution?
She doesn’t say, but it appears to be the local officials of the Red Guard.
This is an excerpt from the book published in 2010. From the Amazon review:
In August 1966, a group of Red Guards ransacked Nien Cheng’s home, threatened her and destroyed
priceless, irreplaceable ancient Chinese relics. Cheng's background made her an obvious target for the
fanatics of the Cultural Revolution: educated at the London School of Economics, the widow of an official
of Chiang Kai-shek’s regime, and an employee of Shell Oil, Cheng enjoyed comforts that few Chinese
could afford. When she refused to confess to the false accusations that she was a spy, Cheng was placed in
solitary confinement. Cheng suffered year upon year of bruatality and deprivation, but she refused to give
in to her torturers and interrogators. After more than six years, when they told her would be released
because of her “attitude of repentance,” even then she remained defiant, vowing to remain in detention
until the Communist officials declared her innocent and published an apology.
Life and Death in Shanghai is Cheng's powerful story of her imprisonment, of the hardship and cruelty she
endured, of her heroic resistance, and of her insistent quest for justice when she was released. It is the
story, too, of a country torn apart by Mao Zedong’s savage fight for power. A penetrating personal account
of a terrifying chapter in twentieth-century history, Life and Death in Shanghai is also an astounding
portrait of one woman’s courage.
Following are my excerpts from the text (italicized) and my comments.
…In Mao Zedong’s China, going to prison did not mean the same thing as it did in the democracies. A man
was always presumed guilty until he could prove himself innocent….
…From the moment I became involved in the Cultural Revolution in early July and decided not to make a
false confession, I had not ruled out the possibility of going to prison. I knew that many people, including
seasoned Party members, made ritual confessions of guilt under pressure, hoping to avoid confrontation
with the Party or to lessen their immediate suffering by submission…
At the detention house where she is taken on September 27, 1966, she comments on a guard who is having
trouble writing entries in a ledger:
… That he was doubtless barely literate did not surprise me, as I knew the Communist Party assigned men
jobs for their political reliability rather than for their level of education…
She is assigned a number, 1806, and told to read the prison regulations aloud. They must read Mao’s
proverbs daily, confess to their ‘crimes’, and report on any prisoners who don’t follow regulations.
Reporting on others to authority is a common thread of repressive Chinese governments.227
One of the guards said, “What you should do now is to consider the crime you have committed. When he
calls you, you must show true repentance by making a full confession in order to obtain lenient treatment.
If you denounce others, you’ll gain a point of merit for yourself.”
227 See footnote 34 on page 55 for more on the long tradition among Chinese rulers of encouraging snitches.
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 317 of 323
An annotation in the text notes that Cheng’s daughter was killed by the Red Guard was Cheng was in
prison.
A guard says,“If you have not committed a crime, why are you locked up in prison? Your being here proves
you have committed a crime.”
“Perhaps you did not realize you were committing a crime at the time. You are probably still quite
muddled,” the guard said. He seemed quite sincere. … “We go by the teachings of our Great Leader
Chairman Mao. His words are our criteria. If he says a certain type of person is guilty and you belong to
that type, then you are guilty. It’s much simpler than depending on a lawbook.”
Images from the Cultural Revolution around the world Mao was revered in left-wing revolutionary circles around the world.
Black Panther Party members holding up Mao's Little Red Book. Huey Newton, the founder of the Black Panther
Party, was influenced by Mao's works
Ieng Sary in 1970 shaking hands with Mao, with Pol Pot, the leader of the Khmer Rouge, in the background. Pol Pot
was a Communist and was heavily influenced by Maoist ideology
Posters for Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). The SDS is an important organization for student activism in
the US in the 1960s and 1970s. The society included not just civil rights and anti-Vietnam War advocates, but also
Maoists and Trotskyists.
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 318 of 323
Discussion Who was responsible for the chaos of the Cultural Revolution? Was it Mao, the Gang of Four, the Red Guards, or
the ordinary Chinese who sometimes betrayed their own families and colleagues? Does it matter? What other
aspects of the Cultural Revolution should we also pay attention to?
From PriscillaN:
Mao certainly was the instigator. All the other groups provided support that allowed the Red Guard to run
completely out of control. I don't think that it matters who did what from this remove except as a matter of
historical accuracy. The great damage to the Chinese state, CCP and the people and culture of China was
done and it will be long and hard for the recovery to be complete. China moved from a culture where the
extended family was all important to one where it was not uncommon for family members to denounce one
another to the authorities to save their own skins in a relatively short time. The loss of artifacts and books,
the loss of trust in other people and in the government and the general destruction of the elements of
civilization must surely have left scars both mental and physical.
My thoughts:
As always, Priscilla, very well said.
A leader cannot lead his people into ruin without ardent followers. While I'm comfortable blaming anyone
for brutality no matter who gives the order, the moral responsibility intensifies the higher up you go. The
intent to persuade the malleable to brutality is a greater crime than the brutality itself (though that is still
an horrific crime).
To me, it does matter who did what. Holding people responsible for their evil is a deterrent we shouldn't
relinquish and I'd lay the blame first with Mao, then with the Gang of Four, and then the Red Guards and
right down the line. I can hardly take the blame off a family member who betrays another, though that I
believe, is a social misdeed the family should punish, and not a crime.
Perhaps the greatest challenge that faces the human race as we strive to improve ourselves is to find ways
to help the individual retain their individuality and resist the teachings of brutal leaders. This is one of the
greatest goods that may come of our probing into the brain and human psychology.
Though it's tough to even think about the evil that may arise from these probings when in the hands of
dictators.
ChinaX Part 9 Communist Liberations Page 319 of 323
41: Last Years of Mao and the Reopening of China Professor Roderick MacFarquhar and Prof. Kirby
Introduction In the 1950s, the ‘east wind had prevailed’, meaning that Mao had favored
the Soviets, but by the time of the Cultural Revolution, Mao shunned the
Soviets and attempted to reinvigorate Communism within China by
instigating a false revolution among the youth, and then made tentative
advances toward the U.S.
In the last years of Mao, the old cadres purged during the Cultural
Revolution were brought back, now that they were ‘re-educated’. The
damage from the Cultural Revolution lingered, with strife between factions
that twice in the 1970s seemed to threaten civil war.
Mao himself began a time of physical and possibly mental decline, making
the end of his reign similar to the end of a dynasty, with court intrigue
surrounding a ‘doddering old man still in power.’
The Fall of Lin Biao
What Happened?
In April 1969, the CCP declared in its constitution that Lin Biao was Mao’s official successor:
Comrade Lin Biao has at all times held high the great red banner of Mao Zedong thought.
Two and a half years later, in 1971 when Lin Biao fell from power, the People’s Daily was still praising him, but
would not mention him again until he was denunciated by the party in 1973:
Expel Lin Biao, the bourgeois careerist, conspirator, counter-revolutionary, double-dealer , renegade, and
traitor from the party once and for all.
Suddenly, he was:
dog-droppings, indigestible to human society
What happened to the trusted subordinate, the ordained successor, the man who edited Mao’s Little Red Book?
The 571 Plan228
This was the name of Lin Biao’s plan, as concocted by the CCP, to justify his denunciation.
B52 [the code name for Mao] has not much time to go… he abuses the trust and the status given him by the
Chinese people… he implements the laws of Qin Shi Huang, the founding emperor of Qin… the biggest
feudal despot in Chinese history…229
228 From Wikipedia:
Project 571 was the numeric codename given to an alleged plot to execute a coup d'état against Chinese leader
Mao Zedong in 1971 by the supporters of Lin Biao, then Vice-Chairman of the Communist Party of China. In
Chinese, the numbers "5-7-1" sound like the term "armed uprising". The Chinese government initially claimed
that Lin Biao himself had devised Project 571, but evidence inside and outside of China has made it more likely
that Lin's son, Lin Liguo, a high-ranking officer in the People's Liberation Air Force, instead developed the plot.
Any plots that may have been planned or attempted by Lin Biao or his family ultimately failed. Lin's family
attempted to flee China for the Soviet Union, but died when their plane crashed over Mongolia on September 13,
1971. A draft copy of the Project 571 Outline was discovered following Lin's death, and was publicly circulated
by the Chinese government as a means of explaining the event. 229 Mao compared himself to Qin Shi Huang (see pages 51 and 52) and the students in Tiananmen Square didn’t