Chemotherapy Induced Chemotherapy Induced Nausea Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) and Vomiting (CINV) Causes, Challenges, Evaluation and Causes, Challenges, Evaluation and Optimizing Clinical Management Optimizing Clinical Management Innovation ● Investigation ● Innovation ● Investigation ● Application Application Program Co-Chairman Program Co-Chairman Lee S. Schwartzberg, MD, FACP Lee S. Schwartzberg, MD, FACP Medical Director, The West Clinic Medical Director, The West Clinic Supportive Oncology Services Supportive Oncology Services President, Accelerated Community President, Accelerated Community Oncology Research Network Oncology Research Network Memphis, TN Memphis, TN
38
Embed
Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) Causes, Challenges, Evaluation and Optimizing Clinical Management Innovation Investigation Application.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Emetogenic Potential of Single Emetogenic Potential of Single Antineoplastic Agents Antineoplastic Agents
HIGHHIGH Risk in nearly all patients (> 90%)Risk in nearly all patients (> 90%)
MODERATEMODERATE Risk in 30% to 90% of patientsRisk in 30% to 90% of patients
LOWLOW Risk in 10% to 30% of patientsRisk in 10% to 30% of patients
MINIMALMINIMAL Fewer than 10% at riskFewer than 10% at risk
Patient-Specific Risk Factors for CINVPatient-Specific Risk Factors for CINV
► Age <50 yearsAge <50 years
► Women > menWomen > men
► History of light alcohol use History of light alcohol use
► History of vomiting with prior exposure History of vomiting with prior exposure to chemotherapeutic agents to chemotherapeutic agents
► Other risksOther risks● History of motion sickness History of motion sickness ● History of nausea or vomiting during pregnancyHistory of nausea or vomiting during pregnancy● History of anxietyHistory of anxiety
ASHP. ASHP. Am J Health Syst Pharm.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999:56:729-764; Balfour and Goa. 1999:56:729-764; Balfour and Goa. DrugsDrugs. 1997:54:273-298.. 1997:54:273-298.
Types of CINV: DefinitionsTypes of CINV: Definitions
► Acute (post-treatment)Acute (post-treatment)● Occurs within first 24 hours after administration of cancer Occurs within first 24 hours after administration of cancer
chemotherapychemotherapy
► DelayedDelayed● CINV that begins after first 24 hoursCINV that begins after first 24 hours● May last for 120 hoursMay last for 120 hours
► AnticipatoryAnticipatory● Learned or conditioned response from poorly controlled nausea Learned or conditioned response from poorly controlled nausea
and vomiting associated with previous chemotherapyand vomiting associated with previous chemotherapy
► BreakthroughBreakthrough● CINV that occurs despite prophylaxis and requires rescueCINV that occurs despite prophylaxis and requires rescue
► RefractoryRefractory● Occurs during subsequent treatment cycles when prophylaxis Occurs during subsequent treatment cycles when prophylaxis
and/or rescue has failed in previous cyclesand/or rescue has failed in previous cycles
Pathophysiology of Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced EmesisChemotherapy-Induced Emesis
► FDA approved FDA approved ● IV formulation IV formulation July 25, 2003July 25, 2003● Oral formulation August 22, 2008Oral formulation August 22, 2008
► RegimensRegimens● IV 0.25 mg pre chemotherapyIV 0.25 mg pre chemotherapy acute/delayed HEC/MEC acute/delayed HEC/MEC● PO 0.50 mg pre chemotherapyPO 0.50 mg pre chemotherapy acute MECacute MEC
Palonosetron vs. 1Palonosetron vs. 1stst gen HT-3RA: gen HT-3RA:Complete Response on Day of Chemo & BeyondComplete Response on Day of Chemo & Beyond
**pp<0.025 for pairwise difference (2-sided Fisher’s exact test) between palonosetron and ondansetron/dolasetron.<0.025 for pairwise difference (2-sided Fisher’s exact test) between palonosetron and ondansetron/dolasetron.
Gralla R et al. Gralla R et al. Ann OncolAnn Oncol. 2003; Eisenberg P et al. . 2003; Eisenberg P et al. CancerCancer. 2003.. 2003.Rubenstein EB et al. Rubenstein EB et al. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003. Abstract 2932. 2003. Abstract 2932.
CR = no emetic episodes or use of rescue medicationsCR = no emetic episodes or use of rescue medications
pp < 0.05 Aapro M Support Care Cancer 2003:11:391 < 0.05 Aapro M Support Care Cancer 2003:11:391
Palonosetron vs Ondansetron Palonosetron vs Ondansetron
High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy Patients Also Receiving Dexamethasone Patients Also Receiving Dexamethasone
* *
N=447(67%)
Phase III Trial of IV Palonosetron vs. IV Granisetron Phase III Trial of IV Palonosetron vs. IV Granisetron with Cisplatin or AC-Based Chemotherapywith Cisplatin or AC-Based Chemotherapy
► 1114 patients1114 patients► Cisplatin (57%) or anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (43%) Cisplatin (57%) or anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (43%) ► Single 0.75 mg dose of palo vs. single 40 Single 0.75 mg dose of palo vs. single 40 μμg/kg dose of g/kg dose of
granisetrongranisetron► Dexamethasone 16 mg d1; 4mg/d d 2-3 (AC/EC); Dexamethasone 16 mg d1; 4mg/d d 2-3 (AC/EC);
8mg/d d 2-3 CDDP8mg/d d 2-3 CDDP► Objective: demonstrate non-inferiority d1 Objective: demonstrate non-inferiority d1
and superiority d 2-5 of paloand superiority d 2-5 of palo► Primary endpoint complete response (no emesis/no rescue)Primary endpoint complete response (no emesis/no rescue)
Saito M et al. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(2):115-24 Saito M et al. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(2):115-24
Phase III Trial Palonosetron vs. Granisetron Phase III Trial Palonosetron vs. Granisetron both with Dexamethasone in HECboth with Dexamethasone in HEC
Palo+ Dex(n=555)
%
Grani+ Dex(n=558)
%
P
Complete Response, Acute (0-24h)
73.7 72.1 ND
CR, Delayed (24-120h) 53.0 42.4 0.0003
CR, Overall (0-120h) 47.9 38.1 0.0007
No Nausea:0-120 hours
32 25 0.01
No Emesis:0-120 hours
58 49 0.006
Saito M et al. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(2):115-24 Saito M et al. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(2):115-24
Palonosetron: 5-HTPalonosetron: 5-HT33 Antagonist of Choice? Antagonist of Choice?
► Palonosetron is a 5-HTPalonosetron is a 5-HT33 antagonist with strong receptor binding affinity antagonist with strong receptor binding affinity and an extended half-life and an extended half-life
► In 2 MEC trials, IV palonosetron (single dose) was superior to dolasetron In 2 MEC trials, IV palonosetron (single dose) was superior to dolasetron and ondansetron (single dose) in the prevention of acute and delayed and ondansetron (single dose) in the prevention of acute and delayed emesis in a post-hoc analysisemesis in a post-hoc analysis
► In 1 HEC trial, emetic control was comparable between IV palonosetron In 1 HEC trial, emetic control was comparable between IV palonosetron and ondansetron; better control with palonosetron in the subset receiving and ondansetron; better control with palonosetron in the subset receiving dexamethasonedexamethasone
► In large phase III trial with cisplatin or AC, palonosetron was equivalent to In large phase III trial with cisplatin or AC, palonosetron was equivalent to granisetron in acute control and superior during the delayed phasegranisetron in acute control and superior during the delayed phase
► Comparable tolerability Comparable tolerability
► Ease of use and trends towards superiority favor palonosetron as the Ease of use and trends towards superiority favor palonosetron as the preferred 5-HTpreferred 5-HT33 antagonist antagonist
► Definitive proof of superiority to first generation 5-HTDefinitive proof of superiority to first generation 5-HT33 antagonists would antagonists would require trials with control arms utilizing corticosteroids, NKrequire trials with control arms utilizing corticosteroids, NK11 antagonists antagonists andand repetitive dosing of the first generation agents repetitive dosing of the first generation agents
AprepitantAprepitant
► Selective antagonist of the binding of Substance P to the Selective antagonist of the binding of Substance P to the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptorneurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor
► FDA approved FDA approved ● Oral formulation: March 26, 2003Oral formulation: March 26, 2003● IV formulation (fosaprepitant): January 31, 2008IV formulation (fosaprepitant): January 31, 2008
► RegimenRegimen● 125 mg PO day 1, 80 mg PO days 2-3125 mg PO day 1, 80 mg PO days 2-3 acute/delayed acute/delayed
HEC/MECHEC/MEC● 115 mg IV day 1, 80 mg PO days 2-3115 mg IV day 1, 80 mg PO days 2-3 acute/delayed acute/delayed
Warr DG et al. Warr DG et al. J Clin Oncol J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2822-2830 2005; 23:2822-2830
O = ondansetron PO A = aprepitant POO = ondansetron PO A = aprepitant PO
D = dexamethasone PO P = placebo POD = dexamethasone PO P = placebo PO
PP
Aprepitant in Anthracycline/Cyclophosphamide Aprepitant in Anthracycline/Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy: Complete Response (N=857)Chemotherapy: Complete Response (N=857)
**pp<0.05 <0.05 Complete response (CR): no emesis and no rescue medication.Complete response (CR): no emesis and no rescue medication.
Warr DG et al. Warr DG et al. J Clin Oncol J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2822-2830 2005; 23:2822-2830
*
*
76
55 51
69
4942
0
20
40
60
80
100
Acute: 0-24(Day 1)
Delayed: 24-120(Days 2-5)
Overall: 0-120(Days 1-5)
Com
plet
e R
espo
nse
(CR
)C
ompl
ete
Res
pons
e (C
R)
(% o
f P
atie
nts)
(% o
f P
atie
nts)
Aprepitant (n=433) Standard (n=424)
Time (hr)Time (hr)
Aprepitant in Moderately Emetogenic Aprepitant in Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Percent of Patients with No EmesisChemotherapy: Percent of Patients with No Emesis
Warr DG et al. Warr DG et al. J Clin OncolJ Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2822-2830 2005; 23:2822-2830
**pp<0.001<0.001
**
*88
817677
6959
0
20
40
60
80
100
Acute: 0-24(Day 1)
Delayed: 24-120(Days 2-5)
Overall: 0-120(Days 1-5)
Em
esis
-Fre
eE
mes
is-F
ree
(% o
f Pa
tient
s)(%
of P
atie
nts)
Aprepitant (n=433) Standard (n=424)
Time (hr)
Aprepitant in Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy:Aprepitant in Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Percent of Patients with No Nausea Percent of Patients with No Nausea
No nausea: score <5 mm on 0-100 mm VAS.No nausea: score <5 mm on 0-100 mm VAS.
Warr DG et al. Warr DG et al. J Clin OncolJ Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2822-2830; Warr DG et al. 2005; 23:2822-2830; Warr DG et al. Support Care CancerSupport Care Cancer. 2004. Abstract A027.. 2004. Abstract A027.
Phase III Aprepitant Study (801):Phase III Aprepitant Study (801):Multiple-day OndansetronMultiple-day Ondansetron
► Identical design to Protocols 052 and 054 except Identical design to Protocols 052 and 054 except ondansetron dosed days 1-4 ondansetron dosed days 1-4
► Primary endpoint: complete response on days 1 - 5 after Primary endpoint: complete response on days 1 - 5 after cisplatincisplatin
► Aprepitant regimen superior to control regimen of Aprepitant regimen superior to control regimen of protracted ondansetron and dexamethasone dosing, CR protracted ondansetron and dexamethasone dosing, CR 72% vs. 61% respectively 72% vs. 61% respectively
Schmoll et al: Ann Oncol 17:1000-6, 2006Schmoll et al: Ann Oncol 17:1000-6, 2006
Palonosetron + Aprepitant + Dexamethasone Palonosetron + Aprepitant + Dexamethasone Phase II Study DesignPhase II Study Design
Day 1Day 1 Days 2-3Days 2-3
PALOPALO DD AA DD AA0.25 mg 12 mg 125 mg 80 mg
Grote T et al. Grote T et al. Proc Am Soc Clin OncolProc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004. Abstract 8262.. 2004. Abstract 8262.
PALO = palonosetron IV A = aprepitant POPALO = palonosetron IV A = aprepitant PO
D = dexamethasone PO D = dexamethasone PO
8 mg
• Multicenter, phase II, open-label studyMulticenter, phase II, open-label study• Naïve and non-naïve patients receiving moderately to moderately-Naïve and non-naïve patients receiving moderately to moderately-
Even when physicians follow guidelines (using 1Even when physicians follow guidelines (using 1stst generation 5HT generation 5HT33
RAs), 50% of pts experience delayed CINVRAs), 50% of pts experience delayed CINV
•AgeAge•GenderGender•Emetogenic PotentialEmetogenic Potential•Presence of Acute CINVPresence of Acute CINV
After Adjustment For Prognostic After Adjustment For Prognostic Factors For Delayed CINVFactors For Delayed CINV
Relationship Between Acute CINV and Relationship Between Acute CINV and Delayed CINV: QuestionsDelayed CINV: Questions
► Is acute CINV a strong predictive factor for delayed Is acute CINV a strong predictive factor for delayed CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy?chemotherapy?
► Is prevention of delayed CINV a carryover effect Is prevention of delayed CINV a carryover effect from prevention of acute CINV or a true from prevention of acute CINV or a true pharmacologic effect during the delayed phase?pharmacologic effect during the delayed phase?
► What is the difference in the treatment effect of the What is the difference in the treatment effect of the first-generation 5-HTfirst-generation 5-HT33 receptor antagonists vs receptor antagonists vs palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV after palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV after accounting for known prognostic factors, including accounting for known prognostic factors, including the carryover effect?the carryover effect?
Grunberg SM et al. Grunberg SM et al. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol.Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004. Abstract 8051. 2004. Abstract 8051.
Protection From Delayed CINV:Protection From Delayed CINV:All PatientsAll Patients
17
75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
With Acute CINVWith Acute CINV(n=254)(n=254)
Without Acute CINVWithout Acute CINV(n=500)(n=500)
No
Del
ayed
CIN
VN
o D
elay
ed C
INV
(% o
f Pa
tient
s)(%
of P
atie
nts)
Grunberg SM et al. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004. Abstract 8051.
Protection From Acute and Delayed CINV:Protection From Acute and Delayed CINV:Palonosetron vs Ondansetron/DolasetronPalonosetron vs Ondansetron/Dolasetron
Protection From Delayed CINV Protection From Delayed CINV
*p=0.005 for palonosetron vs ondansetron/dolasetron.†p=0.027 for palonosetron vs ondansetron/dolasetron.
Grunberg SM et al. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004. Abstract 8051.
► 671 pts receiving doxorubicin-based chemotherapy671 pts receiving doxorubicin-based chemotherapy● all treated w/ all treated w/ 11stst generation generation 5HT5HT3 3 + Dex+ Dex on Day 1 of CT on Day 1 of CT
► Pts then randomized Pts then randomized for days 2 and 3for days 2 and 3::● Arm 1: Prochlorperazine 10 mg p.o. three times daily (q 8 h)Arm 1: Prochlorperazine 10 mg p.o. three times daily (q 8 h)
● Arm 2: Arm 2: Any oral 5-HTAny oral 5-HT3 3 antiemetic, using standard dosing antiemetic, using standard dosing regimens regimens
● Arm 3: Arm 3: ProchlorperazineProchlorperazine 10 mg p.o. as needed for nausea 10 mg p.o. as needed for nausea
► Rescue medications for control of symptoms were Rescue medications for control of symptoms were allowedallowed
Are Oral Followup 5-HTAre Oral Followup 5-HT33 RAs RAs Really Effective for Delayed CINV? Really Effective for Delayed CINV?
Hickock et al ASCO 2005 Final Results URCC-CCOPHickock et al ASCO 2005 Final Results URCC-CCOP
11stst Generation Oral 5HT Generation Oral 5HT33 RAs: RAs:Majority of Patients Experience NauseaMajority of Patients Experience Nausea
• Patients randomized for days 2 and 3; rescue medications allowedPatients randomized for days 2 and 3; rescue medications allowed
• Hickock et al ASCO 2005 Final Results URCC-CCOPHickock et al ASCO 2005 Final Results URCC-CCOP
* p = 0.002 (overall comparison); p = 0.06 (* p = 0.002 (overall comparison); p = 0.06 (Prochlorperazine q 8 h vs 5-HTq 8 h vs 5-HT3 3 ); );
p = NS (p = NS (Prochlorperazine prn vs 5-HTprn vs 5-HT3 3 ))
102030405060708090
100 Prochlorperazine q 8h*
5HT33**Prochlorperazine PRN*
% P
atie
nts
with
Del
ayed
Nau
sea
7583 87
11stst Generation Oral 5HT Generation Oral 5HT33 RAs RAs Not Effective for Delayed CINV Not Effective for Delayed CINV
► Vomiting Vomiting
● Significantly Significantly more patients vomitedmore patients vomited at least once during the at least once during the delayed period delayed period (34%)(34%) than on the day of treatment than on the day of treatment (19%) p (19%) p <0.01<0.01
► NauseaNausea
● Nausea severity was significantly greater during the Nausea severity was significantly greater during the delayed period than on the day of treatment delayed period than on the day of treatment p < 0.01p < 0.01
● More patients getting oral 5HTMore patients getting oral 5HT33 RAs required rescue RAs required rescue medications medications (45%)(45%) than patients getting Compazine than patients getting Compazine®® (27-(27-30%)30%) p=0.002p=0.002
Hickock et al ASCO 2005 Final Results URCC-CCOPHickock et al ASCO 2005 Final Results URCC-CCOP
Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of 5-HTMeta-Analysis of Efficacy of 5-HT33RA in Prevention RA in Prevention of Delayed Emesis from Chemotherapyof Delayed Emesis from Chemotherapy
Reviewed 5 studies, 1,716 pts comparing 5-HTReviewed 5 studies, 1,716 pts comparing 5-HT3 3 RA to placebo, RA to placebo,
5 studies, 2,240 pts comparing 5-HT5 studies, 2,240 pts comparing 5-HT33 RA + dexamethasone to RA + dexamethasone to dexamethasone alonedexamethasone alone
Including AC containing regimensIncluding AC containing regimens
Three-drug combination of a HTThree-drug combination of a HT33
serotonin receptor antagonist, serotonin receptor antagonist, (palonosetron preferred-NCCN) (palonosetron preferred-NCCN) dexamethasone, and aprepitantdexamethasone, and aprepitant
Moderate (>30% to 90% emetic Moderate (>30% to 90% emetic risk)risk)
Two-drug combination of a HTTwo-drug combination of a HT33
serotonin receptor antagonist and serotonin receptor antagonist and dexamethasone (+/-aprepitant for dexamethasone (+/-aprepitant for selected patients)selected patients)
Low (10% to 30% emetic risk)Low (10% to 30% emetic risk) Dexamethasone 8-12 mgDexamethasone 8-12 mg
How Can We Improve the Value of How Can We Improve the Value of Care in CINV?Care in CINV?
Value = Value = QualityQuality CostCost
CR CR
Nausea or EmesisNausea or Emesis Functioning Functioning
Side EffectsSide Effects
Compliance or Compliance or Patient Patient
InconvenienceInconvenience
Access to CareAccess to Care
•DirectDirect•IndirectIndirect
Summary Summary
► 11stst generation 5HT generation 5HT3 3 RA’s therapeutically equivalent & major RA’s therapeutically equivalent & major advance in supportive care for control of acute emesisadvance in supportive care for control of acute emesis
► No major progress in CINV for ~ 10+ yrs until aprepitant & No major progress in CINV for ~ 10+ yrs until aprepitant & palonosetronpalonosetron
► Treatment guidelines have changed Treatment guidelines have changed ● Degree of nausea incurred has been refined for many agentsDegree of nausea incurred has been refined for many agents● Delayed CINV recommendations are updatedDelayed CINV recommendations are updated
► Prevention of CINV has improved, but challenges remainPrevention of CINV has improved, but challenges remain● Improving detection of CINV, especially after 24 hoursImproving detection of CINV, especially after 24 hours● Educating patients and oncology healthcare giversEducating patients and oncology healthcare givers● The development and evaluation of clinically useful The development and evaluation of clinically useful
assessment tools assessment tools ● Further development of regimens to treat delayed CINVFurther development of regimens to treat delayed CINV