Top Banner
CHEMICAL BONDING HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT By Moses G. Mabuza 128529
22

Chemical bonding - Historical Development

Dec 21, 2014

Download

Education

Mabuza Moses

Evolution of the Concept of Chemical Bonding
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

CHEMICAL BONDINGHISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

By Moses G. Mabuza

128529

Page 2: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

INTRODUCTION

Scientific concepts evolve (Trifiro & Trifiro, n.d)

New ideas take time to be accepted (Hoyningen-Huene, 1996)

Concepts change due to:- discovery of new instruments- flaws / mistakes- new ideas with more expl. power- chance

Page 3: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

DEFINITION

Chemical Bond Attraction btn atoms – result to

chemical subst. containing 2 or more atoms.

(Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

Page 4: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

EARLY IDEAS OF BONDING

DEMOCRITUS (c.460 – 370 B.C)Dates back to 5th century – Greece Atoms differ in size, shape &

arrangement of parts Links btn combined atoms Some atoms had hooks & eyes Some had balls & sockets

(Chemical Bonding, n.d)

Page 5: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

EARLY IDEAS OF BONDING CONT.

ASCLEPIADES (c.130 – 40 B.C)Built on ideas of Epicurus – Grk phil. Discussed ‘clusters of atoms’ – did not

know what force bonded them

LUCRETIUS (c.95 – 55 B.C) Atoms attached by

- fishhook-like appendages

Page 6: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

EARLY IDEAS OF BONDING CONT.

DESCARTES (1596 – 1650)Concurred wt Lucretius: Atoms held together

by tiny hooks & barbs

NEWTON Particles attract at a

distance due to force

BOYLE (1627 – 1691)Rejected Newton’s ideas Particles arranged

themselves in grps Chemical change

result from rearrangements within the grps

Page 7: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

EARLY MODERN ADVANCES

JOHN DALTON (1766 – 1844)Birth of modern atomic theory in 1803 All elements composed of tiny

indestructible particles (atoms acc. to Democritus)

All substances are a combination of atoms

Atoms sit next to each other without forming true bonds

Page 8: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

EARLY MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

AMEDEO AVOGADRO (1776 – 1856) Helped distinguish btn atoms &

molecules

BOLTZMANN (1844 – 1906) Proposed atoms had ‘sensitive

regions’

(Chemical Bonding, n.d)

Page 9: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES

AUGUST KEKULE (1829 – 1896)First attempted using modern terminology Defined valency Represented bonds with symbols Dvlped a system of showing

arrangement of bonds in space

Page 10: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

SCOTT COUPER (1831 – 1892) Dvlped a system of short dashed lines

for bondse.g

H–O–H

Page 11: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

JOSEPH THOMSON (1856 – 1940)In 1904 – First to explain chem. bonding in terms of electrons Proposed transfer of corpuscles to form

cpds Atoms oppositely charged, therefore,

form cpds

Page 12: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

Ionic bond theory stood for 2 decades as the only way of bonding

Problem – nonpolar subst. lacked polarity

e.g. H2

Therefore, another explanatory power needed

Page 13: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

GILBERT LEWIS (1875 – 1946)In 1916, Presented covalent bonding to

explain nonpolar molecules Introduced idea – shared pair of

electrons Molecules with unpaired

electron – ‘odd’(Estabrooks,

1998)

Page 14: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

LEWIS (1875 – 1946) Began with Cubical Model

of the Atom

Page 15: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

Thought no diff. btn ionic & covalent bonding

Electron pair not equally shared by atoms (unless same element)

Many organic cpds – not explained by ionic bonding

After demonstrations – covalent bond was accepted alongside the ionic bond

Page 16: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

IRVING LANGMUIR (1881 – 1957)In 1919, Took Lewis’ ideas Called shared-e- pair bond, covalent

bond Named the ‘octet rule’

(Langmuir, n.d)

Page 17: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

DRUDE & LORENTZDid early work in metallic bonding Realised metals contained weakly

bound e-s (conduct electricity)Therefore, Lewis – there were 3 types of bonding

- polar (ionic), nonpolar (covalent) & metallic

Page 18: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

OTHER CHEM. BONDING MODELSLatimer & Rodebush Introduced H – bond to explain bonding

in water & ethanoic acidSidgwick Proposed the coordinate bond

Page 19: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

Quantum mechanics – probability of finding an electron in region of spaceTwo main approaches – VBT & MOTLINUS PAULING (1901 – 1994) Dvlped VBT Learnt from the work of Lewis &

Langmuir Showed that ionic and covalent

bonding were merely extremes

Page 20: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

MODERN ADVANCES CONT.

ROBERT MULLIKEN (1896 – 1986) Dvlped MOT, & Ligand field theory

(together with others) MOT explained the absorption spectra

of molecules

Page 21: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

CONCLUSION

IMPORTANT FEATURES Understanding the atom (composition

& structure) New ideas based on old ones Ancient philosophers were speculating

– no experimentation

Page 22: Chemical bonding  - Historical Development

- THE END -

THANK YOU!

Babe Mabuza