CHEMICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AN UNRESOLVED COMPLEX MIXTURE-RICH BIODEGRADED CRUDE OIL ALF G. MELBYE,{ ODD G. BRAKSTAD,{ JORUNN N. HOKSTAD,{ INGER K. GREGERSEN,{ BJØRN H. HANSEN,{ ANDY M. BOOTH,*{§STEVEN J. ROWLAND,§ and KNUT E. TOLLEFSEN{I {Department of Marine Environmental Technology, SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Brattørkaia 17B, Trondheim N-7465, Norway {Department of Ecotoxicology and Risk Assessment, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalle ´en 21, Oslo N-0349, Norway §School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom IDepartment for Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Life Sciences (UMB), P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 A ˚ s, Norway (Received 29 October 2008; Accepted 11 March 2009) Abstract—Chemical and toxicological characterization of unresolved complex mixtures in the water-soluble fraction of an artificially weathered Norwegian Sea crude oil was determined by a combination of chemical analysis and toxicity testing in fish in vitro bioassays. The water-soluble fraction of the crude oil was separated into 14 increasingly polar fractions by preparative high-pressure liquid chromatography. The in vitro toxicity (7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase activity, estrogenicity, and metabolic inhibition) of these fractions was characterized in a primary culture of liver cells (hepatocytes) from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The main contributor to toxicity was one of the most polar fractions, accounting gravimetrically for more than 70% of the organic material in the water-soluble fraction and dominated by an unresolved complex mixture. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time of flight–mass spectrometry identified a large number of cyclic and aromatic sulfoxide compounds and low amounts of benzothiophenes (,0.1% of total mass) in this fraction. Commonly monitored toxic components of crude oil (e.g., naphthalenes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkylated phenols) eluted in less polar fractions, characterized by somewhat lower toxicity. Normalization of in vitro responses to the mass in each fraction demonstrated a more even distribution of toxicity, indicating that toxicity in the individual fractions was related to the amount of material present. Although polar and nonpolar compounds contribute additively to crude oil toxicity, the water-soluble fraction was dominated by polar compounds because of their high aqueous solubility and the high oil–water loading. Under these conditions, the polar unresolved complex mixture–rich fraction might account for a large portion of crude oil toxicity because of its high abundance in the water-soluble fraction. Keywords—Petroleum hydrocarbons Polar compounds Unresolved complex mixture Bioassay Toxicity INTRODUCTION In addition to well-known hydrocarbons, crude oils often contain poorly characterized mixtures of organic compounds, sometimes referred to as unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) [1]. Such UCMs typically dominate the gas chro- matograms of in-reservoir biodegraded crude oils and petro- leum-contaminated environmental samples. Previous studies have shown that mussels from the United Kingdom coast that had bioaccumulated high concentrations of aromatic hydro- carbon UCMs exhibited impaired health [2–4]. Analysis of the mussel tissue extracts using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time of flight–mass spectrometry (GC3GC-ToF-MS) led to the identification of thousands of highly branched alkylaromatic hydrocarbons, including ben- zenes, tetralins, naphthalenes, and more polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [5]. Toxicity studies exposing mussels to model UCM compounds have clearly shown that the impaired health observed in wild populations is at least partially attributable to the bioaccumulation of these chemicals [6,7]. Toxicological effects resulting from exposure to aromatic UCM hydrocarbons have also been reported in other organisms (e.g., the amphipod Corophium volutator) [8]. Furthermore, UCMs are widespread in the environment mainly because of their resistance to natural weathering processes. The UCM can originate from the weathering of oils from natural and anthropogenic sources or from direct inputs of refined oil fractions such as lubricants [1]. Biodegradation studies using model UCM hydrocarbons (e.g., branched alkylbenzenes and tetralins) have shown this resistance is at least partly due to the highly branched nature of the alkyl components [1,9,10]. The combination of persistence, bioavailability, and toxicity of aromatic UCM compounds raises potential environmental concerns that warrant further investigation, as addressed in this study. In addition, crude oils contain a varying proportion of more polar organic compounds that contain nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen atoms in their structures (NSO compounds). Those polar compounds present in low concentrations are expected to contribute to the UCMs [11]. The high polarity of these compounds results in increased dissolution in the water column when compared with their equivalent hydrocarbon homologues (reviewed by Booth [12]). Following oil spills at sea, these compounds have the potential to reach high aqueous concentrations because of their high solubility, and they potentially exert a more specific toxic mechanism of action than hydrocarbon homologues that lack NSO heteroatoms. Despite recent advances in analytical chemical techniques (e.g., GC3GC-ToF-MS), the vast majority of polar organic compounds within UCMs still remain unidentified. * To whom correspondence may be addressed (andy.booth@sintef.no). Published on the Web 5/4/2009. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1815–1824, 2009 ’ 2009 SETAC Printed in the USA 0730-7268/09 $12.00 + .00 1815
10
Embed
Chemical and toxicological characterization of the bricks produced from clay/sewage sludge mixture
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CHEMICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AN UNRESOLVEDCOMPLEX MIXTURE-RICH BIODEGRADED CRUDE OIL
ALF G. MELBYE,{ ODD G. BRAKSTAD,{ JORUNN N. HOKSTAD,{ INGER K. GREGERSEN,{ BJØRN H. HANSEN,{ANDY M. BOOTH,*{§ STEVEN J. ROWLAND,§ and KNUT E. TOLLEFSEN{I
{Department of Marine Environmental Technology, SINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Brattørkaia 17B, TrondheimN-7465, Norway
{Department of Ecotoxicology and Risk Assessment, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalleen 21,Oslo N-0349, Norway
§School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United KingdomIDepartment for Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Life Sciences (UMB), P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 As, Norway
(Received 29 October 2008; Accepted 11 March 2009)
Abstract—Chemical and toxicological characterization of unresolved complex mixtures in the water-soluble fraction of an artificiallyweathered Norwegian Sea crude oil was determined by a combination of chemical analysis and toxicity testing in fish in vitrobioassays. The water-soluble fraction of the crude oil was separated into 14 increasingly polar fractions by preparative high-pressureliquid chromatography. The in vitro toxicity (7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase activity, estrogenicity, and metabolic inhibition) of thesefractions was characterized in a primary culture of liver cells (hepatocytes) from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The maincontributor to toxicity was one of the most polar fractions, accounting gravimetrically for more than 70% of the organic material in thewater-soluble fraction and dominated by an unresolved complex mixture. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography–massspectrometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time of flight–mass spectrometry identified a large number ofcyclic and aromatic sulfoxide compounds and low amounts of benzothiophenes (,0.1% of total mass) in this fraction. Commonlymonitored toxic components of crude oil (e.g., naphthalenes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkylated phenols) eluted in lesspolar fractions, characterized by somewhat lower toxicity. Normalization of in vitro responses to the mass in each fractiondemonstrated a more even distribution of toxicity, indicating that toxicity in the individual fractions was related to the amount ofmaterial present. Although polar and nonpolar compounds contribute additively to crude oil toxicity, the water-soluble fraction wasdominated by polar compounds because of their high aqueous solubility and the high oil–water loading. Under these conditions, thepolar unresolved complex mixture–rich fraction might account for a large portion of crude oil toxicity because of its high abundance inthe water-soluble fraction.
Aldrich) under a gentle stream of nitrogen before testing in
the bioassays. The hepatocytes were isolated from male
rainbow trout (200–500 g) obtained from Killi Oppdrettsan-
legg (Dombas, Norway), seeded as a monolayer culture, and
exposed to test chemicals and extracts as previously described
[23]. Briefly, hepatocytes were isolated by a two-step perfusion
Fig. 1. Gas chromatograms of the total water soluble fraction (WSF) and individual high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) isolated fraction(F)1, F6, and F11. The solvent polarity gradient used in the HPLC fractionation is shown for each of the 14 fractions.
Characterization and toxicity of the WSF of crude oil UCMs Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2009 1817
method and diluted in serum-free L-15 medium (Biowhit-
taker); 200-ml cell suspensions (0.5 million cells/ml) were seeded
in 96-well PrimariaH plates (Becton-Dickinson Labware) and
kept in ambient atmosphere at 15uC. The cells were then
cultured for 1 d in growth medium before replacement of half
the initial volume by growth medium containing the vehicle
DMSO (final concentration ,1%, v/v), different concentra-
tions of the bioassay standards 17b-estradiol (E2), 2,3,7,8-
of the WSF into 14 individual fractions of increasing polarity
(F1–F14; Fig. 1). The two peaks present on top of the UCM in
the total WSF extract chromatogram were identified as
extraction standards (o-terphenyl and 5-a-androstane). The
total amount of material in each fraction was determined
gravimetrically, and the percent contribution to the WSF was
calculated (Table 1). Table 1 shows a significant proportion
(10.2%) of the WSF compounds eluted in F1, which
corresponds to a mobile phase comprising 100% hexane.
Fractions 2 to 4 (up to 50% DCM in hexane) contained
virtually no material (,1%; Table 1), indicating that most
low-polarity WSF compounds eluted in F1. The midpolar (50–
70% DCM) F5 to F7 accounted for approximately 2 to 5% of
the WSF (Table 1) and were dominated by GC-resolvable
components (Fig. 1). Fractions 8 to 10 (100% DCM)
accounted for 1 to 2% of the WSF, but the chromatograms
were dominated by small UCMs (results not shown). Fraction
11 (methanol 0–20% in DCM) accounted for 71.1% of the
total WSF compounds. The GC-MS chromatogram of F11
(Fig. 1) was dominated by a broad UCM with very few
resolved peaks. The final F12 to F14 (methanol 20–50% in
DCM) contained very little material (,2%). Gravimetrically,
therefore, more than 70% of the organic material present in the
crude oil WSF was accounted for as polar UCM compounds
in F11.
The toxicity of crude oil WSFs is typically associated with
readily identifiable compounds such as naphthalenes, PAHs,
and phenols. Figure 2 shows the percent contribution of
identified compounds relative to the estimated masses of F1
and F5 to F11 (fractions that accounted for .95% of the WSF
Table 1. Estimated concentration of organic material in each of the 14high-pressure liquid chromatography–separated fractions (F1–F14)and their percent contribution to the total organic extract of the water-
and will typically dissolve into the water column in higher
amounts than their less polar hydrocarbon homologues [27].
In many studies of crude oil WSFs, observed toxicological
responses are frequently attributed only to those compounds
that are readily resolved and identified by GC-MS (e.g.,
naphthalenes, PAHs, and phenols). These compounds are
indeed toxic, and their quantification in petroleum-contami-
nated environmental samples can be used to assess the
potential health effects on marine organisms [16,17,28,29].
These compounds were also monitored in our study, and their
gravimetric and toxicological contributions to the WSF F1 to
F14 were determined (Fig. 2). However, it has been recognized
for some time that other hydrocarbon and organic constituents
are likely contributors to crude oil toxicity [30].
Fig. 3. In vitro toxicity of the 14 high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)–separated fractions of the water-soluble fraction (WSF) of crude oil:(A) aryl hydrogen receptor (AhR) agonists (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents, TCDD-EQs) measured by induction of CYP1A-mediated activity of 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD), (D) metabolic inhibition expressed as toxic units (TU 5 100/EC50), and (G) estrogenreceptor (ER) agonists (17b-estradiol equivalents, E2-EQ) measured by ER-mediated induction of the estrogenic biomarker vitellogenin.Gravimetrically normalized toxicity for the 14 HPLC-separated WSF fractions: (B) AhR agonists (TCDD-EQ), (E) metabolic inhibition (TU), and(H) ER agonists (E2-EQ). Mass normalized numbers were also expressed as percentage of the sum of all fraction toxicity: (C) AhR agonists, (F)metabolic inhibition, and (I) ER agonists. All data are expressed as mean 6 standard error of the mean (n 5 2–3). Metabol. inhibit. 5metabolic inhibition.
1820 Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2009 A.G. Melbye et al.
The resolved peaks in F1 to F7 chromatograms permitted
identification and mass determination of some compounds on
the basis of their mass spectra (Fig. 2). The observed
distributions are similar to those reported previously for other
oils (e.g., [31] and references therein). The least polar fraction
(F1) was dominated by C0–3 naphthalenes and three-ring
PAHs and their C0–3 alkylated homologues. Aromatic
hydrocarbons exhibit a much lower polarity than homologous
compounds containing NSO atoms [27], and their elution in
the least polar fractions (e.g., F1; Fig. 2) is consistent with
their physicochemical properties. The polarity of the aromatic
ring system explains why the smaller two- to four-ring
aromatics occur in the WSF [27,32]. The midpolar fractions
(F5–F7) contained further three- to five-ring alkylated PAHs,
alkylphenols, and some benzothiophenes. The occurrence of
the alkylphenols and benzothiophenes in these fractions is
consistent with the higher polarity of these compounds.
Of the remaining polar fractions, F8–F10 contained only
UCMs and no identifiable compounds, and F11 contained an
abundant UCM, of which a small contribution (,0.1% by
mass) was identified as C1–3 dibenzothiophenes. However, the
presence of a polar UCM in the chromatograms of F11 and
other polar fractions made characterization of these unknown
compounds virtually impossible in that no ‘‘clean’’ mass
spectra could be attained. A preliminary GC3GC-ToF-MS
analysis of F11 identified five different classes of monocyclic,
bicyclic, and aromatic compounds containing a sulfur–oxygen
functional group (Supporting Information, Fig. S1; http://dx.
doi.org/10.1897/08-545.S1). Within each class, a homologous
series of increasingly alkylated compounds was identified from
mass spectra exhibiting molecular ions increasing by 14 mass
units. The large numbers of isomers present for each molecular
weight indicated the presence of isomeric compounds that
exhibited different degrees of branching on the alkyl chains
However, fish cells have been used successfully to determine
the effects of oil-related compounds elsewhere [16,17,37].
Most fractions, even those containing very small amounts
of material (e.g., F2–F4 and F8–F10), appeared to contain
AhR agonists. The more even distribution of toxicity across all
of the fractions after normalization (Fig. 3B) verified that
most fractions contained AhR agonists in similar quantities.
Interestingly, F10 accounted for almost 40% of the total WSF
bioactivity (Fig. 3C), although the presence of a UCM meant
that less than 0.2% of the compounds could be identified. This
suggests that a common structural feature (likely to be the
polyaromatic rings of PAHs and similar compounds) was
present in most of the fractions. On the basis of previous
studies showing induction of AhR-mediated EROD activity in
fish ([35] and references therein) and fish cell cultures [15,36],
the aromatic hydrocarbons present in F1 could be expected to
cause the observed increased EROD activity in this study. Less
information exists for polar NSO compounds, but a study by
Jung et al. [38] observed CYP1A induction in fish hepatoma
cells by nitro-PAHs and nitro-heterocyclic aromatic hydrocar-
bons. Such compounds could be present in the polar fractions
(e.g., F10 and F11), but they could not be identified with the
current chemical analytical approach because of the unre-
solved nature of the UCMs. Interestingly, the synthetic
mixture comprising known aromatic compounds (SF1;
Fig. 4A) did not cause increased EROD activity, even though
certain compounds (e.g., methylanthracene and chrysene) were
Fig. 4. Toxicity of synthetic fraction (SF) mixtures (SF1, SF6, and SF11) in a fish in vitro bioassay when exposed individually and in combination:(A) aryl hydrogen receptor (AhR) agonists (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents, TCDD-EQ) measured by induction of CYP1A-mediated activity of 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD), (B) metabolic inhibition expressed as toxic units (TU 5 100/EC50), and (C) estrogenreceptor (ER) agonists (17b-estradiol equivalents, E2-EQ) measured by ER-mediated induction of the estrogenic biomarker vitellogenin. Data areexpressed as mean 6 standard error of the mean (n 5 3). ND 5 not detected.
Characterization and toxicity of the WSF of crude oil UCMs Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2009 1821
present at sufficient concentrations to theoretically cause
EROD activation in the bioassay. Therefore we suggest that
the lack of induction could be caused by the simultaneous
presence of EROD inducers (e.g., low–molecular weight PAHs
such as methylated phenanthrenes) and potential EROD
inhibitors (e.g., high molecular weight PAHs and alkylphe-
nols). As expected, SF11 did not generate a response in this or
the other bioassay studies. The low concentration of the
dibenzothiophenes in the synthetic mixture was probably
below the concentrations required to elicit a response in the in
vitro bioassay.
Metabolic inhibition (measured as reduction in cellular
metabolic activity) was detected in F1 and F5 to F11
(Fig. 3D), with F1 and F11 giving the greatest responses.
Mass normalization of the data (Fig. 3E) revealed that the
responses of F1 and F11 were lower than some of the other
fractions (e.g., F5–F10) when present at equal concentrations.
This indicates that a high concentration of less toxic
compounds in the WSF can be of larger toxicological relevance
than low concentrations of presumably more toxic com-
pounds. The change in response when the data are normalized
also suggests that toxicity is the result of a more unspecific
mode of action, consistent with the suggestions that most
organic chemicals act through narcosis or polar narcosis [39].
As expected, the synthetic mixture SF6, but not SF1, induced
metabolic inhibition (Fig. 4B), which is in agreement with
findings that polar compounds such as alkylphenols elicit
cytotoxicity in the fish in vitro bioassay [16]. Interestingly, the
more hydrophobic aromatic hydrocarbons in SF1 do
not appear to be responsible for the metabolic inhibition
observed in F1 of the WSF, thus suggesting that other
(probably unresolved) compounds present in these fractions
were responsible [5,6], that the concentrations of the com-
pounds occurring in the synthetic mixture were not high
enough to cause toxicity, or that bioassay-specific partitioning
factors underestimated the toxic potency of these constituents
in SF1.
Estrogenicity (assessed in terms of VTG induction) was
detected in F1 and F6 to F12 (Fig. 3C), with F11 apparently
leading to the greatest responses. Following mass normaliza-
tion, a more even distribution of toxicity across all of the
fractions was observed, but with the highest responses
corresponding to the polar fractions (F8–F10; Fig. 3F). In
fact F8 to F10 accounted for approximately 90% of the total
ER agonists in the WSF fractions when normalized to mass
(Fig. 3I). These findings are consistent with the presence of
polar ER agonists such as alkylphenols in these fractions.
Structure–activity relationship studies suggest that most
alkylphenols with straight and branched alkylated chains
ranging from C1 to C8 can bind to the rainbow trout estrogen
receptor and activate the production of VTG in vitro [17]. The
association of normal and branched C1 to C8 alkylphenols
with estrogenicity of oil-related discharges has been amply
demonstrated [20]. However, it is suggested that the significant
responses observed in the other fractions indicate that other
compounds in the oil could also elicit estrogenic effects. The
contribution of polar alkylphenols to estrogenicity was further
supported by the induction of VTG in hepatocytes after
exposure to the synthetic mixture SF6 containing C1 to C5
alkylphenols. A lack of response in less polar fractions, such as
the synthetic mixture SF1 (Fig. 4C), indicated that compounds
other than those identified in the apolar F1 of the WSF might
be responsible.
Comparison of the measured and mass normalized data for
each of the toxicity endpoints indicated that toxicity was
dependent on the individual amount of compounds in each
fraction. These findings are consistent with a nonspecific mode
of action across all the fractions. Although the synthetic
mixtures SF1 and SF11 did not produce toxic responses in any
of the endpoints studied, it is still possible that the compounds
present contribute additively to the observed toxicity in the oil
fractions. Because the total concentration of synthetic com-
pounds in SF1 and SF11 was only 16 and 0.1% of the total
hydrocarbon mass, respectively, this amount might have been
insufficient to elicit the response observed with the oil samples.
We suggest that the remaining uncharacterized compounds in
the oil fractions were largely responsible for the observed
toxicity.
The source of the crude oil and the method of WSF
preparation dictate the component composition of WSFs [40].
As a result, the high oil–water loading used might favor
increased dissolution of the more polar constituents, thus
potentially giving rise to enrichment of the polar compounds in
the WSF as proposed by Shiu et al. [40]. Although feasible as
screening tools, use of in vitro bioassays might not accurately
predict the potential effects to fish in vivo, and extrapolation
to fish population effects might be uncertain. However, this
study offers a novel approach for performing chemical and
toxicological characterization of complex mixtures. Future
studies should focus on studying the different factors affecting
WSF composition and the extrapolation of in vitro data to in
vivo bioactivity in order to perform thorough studies to
resolve complex samples such as WSFs from UCM-rich oils.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, a single in-reservoir biodegraded Norwegian
Sea crude oil was used to generate a WSF at a high oil–water
loading ratio (10,000 mg/L) representing a large spill event.
Under these conditions, the data indicate that the WSF was
dominated by the more polar petroleum compounds. Al-
though the high oil–water loading ratio used might have
favored increased dissolution of the more polar constituents,
they accounted gravimetrically for more than 70% of the WSF.
Furthermore, these polar compounds are present as an UCM
that makes identifying and characterizing them extremely
difficult; comprehensive GC3GC-ToF-MS promises to ease
this situation somewhat, but interpretation of the mass spectra
of unknowns can still be time consuming and requires
considerable expertise [5,6,33,34]. Although polar compounds
exert significant in vitro effects, normalization of the data to
equal concentrations showed that they were not necessarily the
most toxic compounds present in the WSF. For a crude oil
such as that investigated here, a large spill event could result in
the concentration of polar compounds (including polar UCM
compounds), reaching much higher levels in the water column
than that of other crude oil compounds (e.g., apolar
hydrocarbons). Driven by a combination of high oil–water
loading and increased aqueous solubility (compared with
hydrocarbon homologues), polar UCM compounds could
become the most toxicologically important in the WSF. Until
now, most environmental monitoring has focused on aromatic
hydrocarbons (e.g., PAHs), and this study shows such
compounds might be less abundant in the WSF than the
polar UCM components. Future research should be directed
toward the chemical characterization, environmental fate and
persistence, and toxicological effects on marine organisms of
1822 Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2009 A.G. Melbye et al.
UCMs originating from a variety of commercially relevant
crude oils and different oil–water loadings.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Table S1. Concentrations (mg ml21) of decalins, naphtha-
lenes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and phenols
in synthetically prepared mixtures representing the identifiable
compounds in fractions 1, 6, and 11 from North Sea crude oil
water-soluble fraction (WSF). SF 5 synthetic fraction.
Fig. S1. Structures of the five alkylated sulfoxide compound
groups identified in an in-reservoir biodegraded North Sea
crude oil water-soluble fraction (WSF) with the use of
comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time of
flight–mass spectrometry (GC3GC-ToF-MS). All groups
contain both hexa- and penta-cyclic rings and exhibit
increasing degrees of alkylation.
All found at DOI: 10.1897/08-545.S1 (72 KB PDF).
Acknowledgement—The authors thank the Norwegian ResearchCouncil for providing financial support to this project (173451). Wethank A.C. Lewis (University of York) for access to GC3GC-ToF-MS and Olav Bøyum, Eivind Farmen Finne, Oscar Fogelberg, Anja J.Nilsen, and Ase Bakketun for their assistance in bioassay testing.Finally, we thank Kjersti Almas and Inger Steinsvik for theirassistance with the chemical analyses.
REFERENCES
1. Gough MA, Rowland SJ. 1990. Characterisation of unresolvedcomplex mixtures of hydrocarbons in petroleum. Nature 344:648–650.
2. Rowland S, Donkin P, Smith E, Wraige E. 2001. Aromatichydrocarbon ‘‘humps’’ in the marine environment: Unrecognizedtoxins? Environ Sci Technol 35:2640–2644.
3. Smith E, Wraige E, Donkin P. Rowland S. 2001. Hydrocarbonhumps in the marine environment: Synthesis, toxicity and aqueoussolubility of monoaromatic compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2428–2432.
4. Donkin P, Smith EL, Rowland SJ. 2003. Toxic effects ofunresolved complex mixtures of aromatic hydrocarbons accumu-lated by mussels, Mytilus edulis, from contaminated field sites.Environ Sci Technol 37:4825–4830.
5. Booth AM, Sutton PA, Lewis CA, Lewis AC, Scarlett A, Chau W,Widdows J, Rowland SJ. 2007. Unresolved complex mixtures ofaromatic hydrocarbons: Thousands of overlooked persistent,bioaccumulative, and toxic contaminants in mussels. Environ SciTechnol 41:457–464.
6. Booth AM, Scarlett AG, Lewis CA, Belt ST, Rowland SJ. 2008.Unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) of aromatic hydrocarbons:Branched alkyl indanes and branched alkyl tetralins are present inUCMs and accumulated by and toxic to, the mussel Mytilus edulis.Environ Sci Technol 42:8122–8126.
7. Scarlett A, Rowland SJ, Galloway TS, Lewis AC, Booth AM.2008. Chronic sublethal effects associated with branched alkyl-benzenes bioaccumulated by mussels. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:561–567.
8. Scarlett A, Canty MN, Smith EL, Rowland SJ, Galloway TS.2007. Can amphipod behavior help to predict chronic toxicity ofsediments? Human Ecol Risk Assess 13:506–518.
9. Booth AM, Aitken C, Jones DM, Lewis CA, Rowland SJ. 2007.Resistance of toxic alkylcyclohexyltetralins to biodegradation byaerobic bacteria. Organic Geochem 38:540–550.
10. Holowenko FM, MacKinnin MD, Fedorak PM. 2002. Charac-terization of naphthenic acids in oil sands wastewaters by gaschromatography–mass spectrometry. Water Res 36:2843–2855.
11. Burwood R, Speers GC. 1974. Photo-oxidation as a factor in theenvironmental dispersal of crude oil. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 2:117–135.
12. Booth AM. 2004. Biodegradation, aqueous solubility and charac-terization studies of unresolved complex mixtures (UCMs) ofaromatic hydrocarbons. PhD thesis. University of Plymouth,Plymouth, Devon, UK.
13. Thomas KV, Balaam J, Barnard N, Dyer R, Jones C, Lavender J,McHugh M. 2002. Characterisation of potentially genotoxiccompounds in sediments collected from United Kingdom estuar-ies. Chemosphere 49:247–258.
14. Tollefsen K-E, Finne EF, Romstad R, Sandberg C. 2006. Effluentsfrom oil production activities contain chemicals that interfere withnormal function of intra- and extra-cellular estrogen bindingproteins. Mar Environ Res 62(Suppl):191–194.
15. Tollefsen K-E, Goksøyr A, Hylland K. 2006. Assessment ofcytotoxic, CYP1A inducing and oestrogenic activity in watersfrom the German Bight and the Statfjord area of the North Sea bya suite of fish in vitro bioassays. In Hylland K, Lang T, VethaakD, eds, Biological Effects of Contaminants in Marine PelagicEcosystems, 1st ed. SETAC, Brussels, Belgium, pp 385–395.
16. Tollefsen K-E, Blikstad C, Eikvar S, Finne EF, Gregersen IK.2008. Cytotoxicity of alkylphenols and alkylated non-phenolics ina primary culture of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)hepatocytes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 69:6–73.
17. Tollefsen K-E, Eikvar S, Finne EF, Fogelberg O, Gregersen IK.2008. Estrogenicity of alkylphenols and alkylated non-phenolics ina rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) primary hepatocyteculture. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:370–383.
18. Tollefsen K-E, Harman C, Smith A, Thomas KV. 2007. Estrogenreceptor (ER) agonists and androgen receptor (AR) antagonists ineffluents from Norwegian North Sea production platforms. MarPollut Bull 54:277–283.
19. Safe SH. 1998. Hazard and risk assessment of chemical mixturesusing the toxic equivalency factor approach. Environ HealthPerspect 106:1051–1058.
20. Thomas KV, Balaam J, Hurst MR, Thain JE. 2004. Bio-analyticaland chemical characterisation of offshore produced water effluentsfor estrogen receptor (ER) agonists. J Environ Monit 6:593–598.
21. Singer MM, Aurand D, Bragin GE, Clark JR, Coelho GM, SowbyML, Tjeerdema RS. 2000. Standardization of the preparation andquantification of water-accommodated fractions of petroleum fortoxicity testing. Mar Pollut Bull 40:1007–1016.
22. Norwegian Oil Industry Association. 2003. Recommended guide-lines for the sampling and analysis of produced water. Guideline085. Stavanger, Norway.
23. Tollefsen K-E, Mathisen R, Stenersen J. 2003. Induction ofvitellogenin synthesis in an Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)hepatocyte culture: A sensitive in vitro bioassay for the oestrogenicand anti-oestrogenic activity of chemicals. Biomarkers 8:394–407.
24. Ganassin RC, Schirmer K, Bols NC. 2000. Cell and tissue culture.In Ostrander GK, ed, The Laboratory Fish. Academic, San Diego,CA, USA, pp 631–651.
25. Schirmer K, Chan AGJ, Bols NC. 2000. Transitory metabolicdisruption and cytotoxicity elicited by benzo[a]pyrene in two celllines from rainbow trout liver. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 14:262–276.
26. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Proteinmeasurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275.
27. Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM. 2003. Envi-ronmental Organic Chemistry. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
28. Hutchinson TH, Field MDR, Manning MJ. 2003. Evaluation ofnon-specific immune functions in dab, Limanda limanda L.,following short-term exposure to sediments contaminated withpolyaromatic hydrocarbons and/or polychlorinated biphenyls.Mar Environ Res 55:193–202.
29. Page DS, Boehm PD, Stubblefield WA, Parker KR, Gilfillan ES,Neff JM, Maki AW. 2002. Hydrocarbon composition and toxicityof sediments following the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince WilliamSound, Alaska, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1438–145.
30. Neff JM, Ostazeski S, Gardiner W, Stejskal I. 2000. Effects ofweathering on the toxicity of three offshore Australian crude oilsand diesel fuel to marine animals. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1809–1821.
31. Ali L. 1995. The dissolution and photodegradation of Kuwaitcrude oil in seawater. PhD thesis. University of Plymouth,Plymouth, Devon, UK.
32. McAuliffe C. 1966. Solubility in water of paraffin, cycloparaffin,olefin, acetylene, cycloolefin, and aromatic hydrocarbons. J PhysChem 70:1267–1275.
33. Ventura GT, Kenig F, Reddy CM, Frysinger GS, Nelson RK, VanMooy B, Gaines RB. 2008. Analysis of unresolved complexmixtures of hydrocarbons extracted from Late Archean sediments
Characterization and toxicity of the WSF of crude oil UCMs Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2009 1823
by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography(GC3GC). Organic Geochem 39:846–867.
34. Reddy CM, Eglinton TI, Hounshell A, White HK, Xu L, GainesRB, Frysinger GS. 2002. The West Falmouth oil spill after thirtyyears: The persistence of petroleum hydrocarbons in marshsediments. Environ Sci Technol 36:4754–4760.
35. Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NPE. 2003. Fishbioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assess-ment: A review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13:57–149.
36. Navas JM, Babin M, Casado S, Fernandez C, Tarazona JV. 2006.The Prestige oil spill: A laboratory study about the toxicity of thewater-soluble fraction of the fuel oil. Mar Environ Res 62(Suppl):S352–S355.
37. Schirmer K, Chan AG, Greenberg BM, Dixon DG, Bols NC.1998. Ability of 16 priority PAHs to be photocytotoxic to a cellline from the rainbow trout gill. Toxicology 127:143–155.
38. Jung DKJ, Klaus T, Fent K. 2001. Cytochrome P450 induction bynitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, azaarenes, and binarymixtures in fish hepatoma cell line PLHC-1. Environ Toxicol Chem20:149–159.
39. Jaworska JS, Schultz TW. 1994. Mechanism-based comparisons ofacute toxicities elicited by industrial organic chemicals in procaryoticand eucaryotic systems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 29:200–213.
40. Shiu WY, Bobra M, Bobra AM, Maijanen A, Sunito L, MackayD. 1990. The water solubility of crude oils and petroleumproducts. Oil Chem Pollut 7:57–84.
1824 Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2009 A.G. Melbye et al.