Chef Menteur Bridge and Approaches 0 and... · Stage 0 Feasibility Study and Stage 1 Environmental Assessment Bridge Replacement Project Chef Menteur Bridge and Approaches FAP and

Chef Menteur Bridge and

Approaches

Louisiana Transportation

Conference 2013

Lynn Maloney-Mújica, AICP

Imagine the result

Stage 0 Feasibility Study

and

Stage 1 Environmental Assessment

Bridge Replacement Project

Chef

Menteur

Bridge and

Approaches

FAP and SP

No.

H000263

Chef Bridge

Deficiencies

Related to

Age and

Design

• Lack of

Shoulders

• Narrow travel

lanes

• Stopping sight

distances

• Load posted

• Reduced speed

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 10

Structural

Deficiencies

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 11

Needs

• Meet current standards for

design and structural capacity

• Improve operational efficiency

of US 90 for transportation and

as an alternative evacuation

route

• Address operational reliability

and reduce maintenance costs

• Raise roadway above surge

elevation

• Improve utility for bicyclists

• Feasibility

• Environmental Checklist

• Public Outreach

• Alternative Alignments

• Navigational Clearances

Sta

ge

0

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review

–Environmental Assessment (EA)

– Impact Analysis

–Public and Agency Involvement

–Line and Grade

–Finding of No Significant Impacts (FONSI)

–Decision Documentation

Sta

ge

1

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 14

And you are the only bridge in town!

NEPA

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 15 © 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 15

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 16

Community

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 17

Visual Impacts

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 18

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 19

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 20

Other

Issues

• Hazardous

Waste

• Noise

• Relocations

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 21

Navigation

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 22

Addendum to Navigation Height Study

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 23

Wetlands and

Essential Fish

Habitat

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 24 © 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 24

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 25

Section 106

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 26

Historic and Archaeological

Resources

• Fort Macomb Structure

• Fort Macomb NRHP Property

• Archaeological Sites

• Historic Bridge

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 27 © 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 27

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 28

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 29

Threatened and

Endangered

Species

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 30

• West Indian

manatee

• Gulf sturgeon

• Green sea

turtle

• Kemp’s ridley

sea turtle

• Loggerhead

sea turtle

Protected

Species

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 31

Section 4(f)

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 32 © 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 32

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 33

Fort Macomb State Park

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 34

Historic Resources Historic

Resources

• Historic Bridge

• Fort Macomb

Structure

• Fort Macomb

Property

• Archaeological

sites

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 35 © 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 35

Avoidance Alternative 4

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 36

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 37

Permits, Mitigation, and

Commitments

• Coastal Use and Wetlands

Permit

• New Bridge Permit

• Protective measures

during construction

• Memorandum of

Agreement

• Marketing the Bridge

• Historic American

Engineering Record

(HAER)

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 38

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 39

© 2012 ARCADIS 27 February 2013 40

Imagine the result