CHARTER SCHOOLS PROGRAM OFFICE OF INNOVATION AND IMPROVEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MARCH 21, 2016 Charter Schools Program State Education Agency Grants
C H A R T E R S C H O O L S P R O G R A M
OFFICE OF INNOVATION AND IMPROVEMENTU.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
MARCH 21, 2016
Charter Schools Program State Education Agency Grants
Agenda
1. Understanding CSP and the SEA Grant Program
Within ED
Program Purpose and Outcomes
2. Managing Your SEA Grant
Documents to Manage By
Roles and Responsibilities
3. CSP Nonregulatory Guidance – Highlights
4. Funding Restrictions and Other Requirements
5. Technical Assistance and Resources
Understanding CSP and the SEA Program
OII Organization Chart
Office of Innovation and Improvement
Nadya Dabby, Assistant Deputy Secretary
Ursula Wright, Associate Assistant Deputy Secretary
Margo Anderson, Associate Assistant Deputy Secretary
Executive Office
Liza Araujo-Rouse
Executive Officer
Charter Schools Pogram
Stefan Huh, Director
Parental Options and Information
Anna Hinton, Director
Teacher Quality
Programs
VenitiaRichardson,
Director
Office of Non-Public Education
and Military Affairs
Maureen Dowling, Director
Investing in Innovation
Program Office
Shane Mulhern, Director
CSP Staff
CSP Program Manager: Erin Pfeltz
State Education Agency Grants (SEA):
Leslie Hankerson
Amy Huber
Kate Meeley
Non-State Education Agency Grants (Non-SEA):
Eddie Moat
Lourdes Rivery
Replication and Expansion Grants (CMO):
Clifton Jones
Kate Meeley
Brian Martin
Eddie Moat
Erin Pfeltz
Lourdes Rivery
Soumya Sathya
National Leadership Grants:
Brian Martin
Soumya Sathya
SOAR Act
Soumya Sathya
Monitoring and Data Contracts
Patricia Kilby-Robb
Credit Enhancement for Charter School Facilities Grants:
Clifton Jones
State Facilities Incentive Grants:
Clifton Jones
Administrative Support:
Cheryl Weekes
CSP Director: Stefan Huh
Authorization and Program Purpose
Legislative purpose
ESEA Title V, Part B – Public Charter Schools: Subpart 1 – Charter Schools Program
Section 5201: It is the purpose of this subpart to increase national understanding of the charter schools model by –
1) Providing financial assistance for the planning, program design, and initial implementation of charter schools;
2) Evaluating the effects of such schools, including the effects on students, student academic achievement, staff, and parents;
3) Expanding the number of high-quality charter schools available to students across the Nation; and
4) Encouraging the States to provide support to charter schools for facilities financing in an amount more nearly commensurate to the amount the States have typically provided for traditional public schools.
Mission
To support the creation, expansion, and improvement of high-quality charter
schools across the nation.
9
38 states across the country have received grants from the SEA program1.
Note: States in gray (i.e., AL, KY, ME, MS, MT, ND, NE, SD, VT, WA, WV, WY) did not receive an SEA grant. KY, MT, ND, NE, SD, VT, and WV have not had charter laws in place during this time.1 Since the inception of the CSP program in 1995.
Federal funds have also helped charter schools find suitable facilities, disseminate promising charter
school practices, promote exemplary collaborations with traditional public schools, and invest in national
activities and initiatives that support charter schools.
THE CSP HAS PROVIDED OVER $3.3 BILLION TO FUND THE
STARTUP, REPLICATION AND EXPANSION OF PUBLIC
CHARTER SCHOOLS.
10
NOTE: These slides focus only on the SEA, Non-SEA and CMO grants.
The CSP has awarded $3.3 billion for the creation of charter schools since its inception in 1995, through three grant competitions:
State Educational Agencies (SEA):
$3.0 billion from 1995-2015
Replication and Expansion of
High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO):
$266 million from 2010-2015
Non-State Educational
Agencies (Non-SEA):
$83 million from 2002-2015
1.
2.
3.
THE VAST MAJORITY OF PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL GRANTS
ARE PROVIDED THROUGH THE SEA PROGRAM.
11
Managing Your SEA Grant
Documents to Manage By
Grant Award Notification (GAN) & Special Conditions
Approved Application
EDGAR Title 34 CFR
Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200
GAN
Things to Note:
PR Award Number – aka Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN)
Department of Education contacts
Project Director
Budget/Performance Period
Terms and Conditions
Applicable regulations and statutes
Approved Application
Your approved grant application:
Is a detailed project plan to follow
Meets federal requirements
Aligned with program objectives
States the approved activities, which are allowable and consistent with the program objectives
Establishes the scope of project
Establishes the objectives of the project
Specific Conditions
The GAN may contain specific conditions related to your organization’s past performance
The Department adds specific conditions to address risk identified by pre-award risk reviews of grant applicants, required by the Uniform Guidance
CSP adds conditions based on annual performance reports and monitoring findings when necessary.
All 2015 applicants received a condition noting the relationship between the 5% administrative allowance and the final grant award.
EDGAR
Part 75: Direct Grants
Part 76: State-Administered Programs
Part 77: Definitions
Part 79: Intergovernmental review of Department of Education Programs and Activities
Part 81: General Education Provisions Act
Part 82: Lobbying
Part 84: Drug-Free workplace
Part 86: Drug and alcohol prevention
Part97: Protection and Human Subjects
Part 98: Student rights in research
Uniform Guidance
Title 2 CFR Part 200
Title 2 CFR Part 3474
Consolidation of OMB Circulars into one singular document for all types of entities
EDGAR Parts 74 & 80 replaced
Applies to all awards made on or after 12/26/2014
ED awards/continuations made before 12/26/14 adhere to the previous rules
Organization of the Uniform Guidance
Subpart A – Acronyms and Definitions
Subpart B – General Provisions
Subpart C – Pre-Award Requirements
Subpart D – Post-Award Requirements
Subpart E – Cost Principles
Subpart F – Audit Requirements
Appendices III to V & VII – Indirect Cost/Cost Allocation Plans
Appendix XI – Compliance Supplement for audits
Questions
Roles & Responsibilities: Project Administration
Lines of authority – the project staff members, their roles, and lines of reporting
As stated in approved application
Key personnel changes need ED approval 2 CFR 200.308
Staff aware of project’s purpose, duration, and objectives.
Succession planning is key to a successful grant.
Roles & Responsibilities: Guiding Documents
Keep on site:
Approved application & grant awards
Contracts & subgrant award agreements
Audit & site visit reports
Corrective action plans
Annual reports
Project revision(s) documentation
Current budget & personnel list
Roles & Responsibilities: Financial Management
Adhere to your State or organization accounting and financial management procedures
Meet procurement standards
Meet cash management standards
Enable accurate financial and performance reporting
Roles & Responsibilities: Procurement Standards
Maximize competition (allowable altgernatives to full competition)
Avoid conflicts of interest (and appearance of it)
Monitor contractor performance
Document procurement decisions
States follow state procedures (2 CFR 200.317)
All others follow their own documented procedures (which meet state & local law, and
standards) of
2 CFR 200.318 – 200.326
Roles & Responsibilities: Performance Reporting
Submit annual & final performance reports Valid & reliable data
Report on GPRA standards & indicators
Participate in ED-sponsored evaluation
Conduct an independent project evaluation
2 CFR Part 200
200.328
Roles & Responsibilities: Records Retention
Record retention period is 3 years
Keep time and attendance, contract, purchase, equipment inventory and disposition – all records related to financial and performance reports
Note: Required retention period is longer if grant is involved in litigation, claim or audit
Roles & Responsibilities: Pass-Through Entity Responsibilities
If you make subgrants, you must:
Provide subaward information to subrecipients, including the indirect cost rate
Performance a risk assessment for the purpose of subrecipient monitoring
Monitor the subrecipients’ activities, including a review of financial & performance reports
Verify that every ssubrecipient is audited according to 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F
Questions
CSP Nonregulatory Guidance -Highlights
CSP Eligibility
State educational agencies (SEAs)
SEAs make subgrants to eligible applicants in their State.
These subgrants are used for planning, program design, and initial implementation of a charter school, and to support the dissemination of information about charter schools including successful practices.
Eligible applicant means a developer that has:
a) applied to an authorized public chartering authority to operate a charter school; and
b) Provided adequate and timely notice to that authority under section 5203(d)(3) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7221i(3)).
A subgrant under this program may use the subgrant funds only for— Post-award planning and design of the
educational program; and
Initial implementation of the charter school.
Planning and implementation grants generally may be awarded for a period of up to 36 months (three years), with no more than 18 months used for planning and program design, and no more than 24 months (two years) used for initial implementation of the charter school.
Use of Funds –Planning & Implementation
CSP Allowable Activities
Use of Funds -Dissemination
A State may reserve up to 10 percent of its grant to award dissemination subgrants.
A charter school may apply for dissemination funds whether or not it has applied for or received funds for planning and implementation.
To qualify for the dissemination funds, a charter school must have been operating for at least three consecutive years and must have demonstrated overall success, including:
Substantial progress in improving student achievement;
High levels of parent satisfaction; and
The management and leadership required to overcome start-up problems and establish a thriving and financially viable charter school.
CSP Allowable Activities
Nonregulatory Guidance
Highlights:
• Charter School Definition
• Allowable Expenses (Section D)
• Identifying a Separate School (Section C)
• Lottery Guidance (E-4)
Section 5210 of the ESEAA public school:1. Exempt from significant State or local rules 2. Operated under public supervision and direction3. Operates in pursuit of a specific set of educational objectives4. Provides a program of elementary or secondary education5. Is nonsectarian6. Does not charge tuition7. Complies with all federal discrimination requirements8. Admits students on the basis of a lottery9. Complies with Federal and State public school audit requirements 10. Meets all applicable Federal, State, and local health and safety
requirements11. Operates in accordance with State law12. Has a written performance contract including a description of how
student performance will be measured
Charter School Definition
Allowable Expenses
Use of Grant Funds
CSP Non-Regulatory Guidance, Section D-1 through D-5
• SEAs cannot exceed 5% in administrative costs associated with the grant and 10% in dissemination activities.
• All of the expenses described in D-3 (a)-(d) are allowable under the CSP only to the extent that they are related to the initial implementation of the charter school and cannot be met from State or local sources.
www2.ed.gov/programs/charter/nonregulatory-guidance.html
Allowable Expenses
a) Costs associated with creating and implementing office functions, such as accounting systems, attendance and registration systems, and human resources policies;
b) Costs associated with the installation of computers, data systems, networks, and telephones;
c) Personnel expenses incurred either before or after the school’s opening, provided that these expenses are associated with initial implementation activities (i.e., as opposed to ongoing operations), such as program and curriculum development and integration, and teacher and staff recruiting. (*Note: If personnel split their time between ongoing operational activities and initial implementation activities, only that portion of the time associated with initial implementation of the charter school is allowable as an initial operational cost. The charter school must maintain accurate time and effort records to document the amount of time each employee works on tasks related to the initial implementation of the charter school.); and
d) Rental or occupancy costs for the school facility for a reasonable period of time in preparation for the school’s opening.
Allowable Expenses
Factors to consider when determining if a new school is truly separate and distinct:
a) The terms of the charter; b) Schools established and recognized as separate schools
under the State’s charter school law; c) Separate performance agreements with authorizer(s);d) Whether each school separately reports its academic
performance for ESEA reporting purposes; e) Separate facilities; f) Separate staffs; and g) Whether the charter schools’ day-to-day operations are
carried out by different administrators.
Can you fund this growth?
Any new school must conduct a separate admissions process and lottery.
If an SEA wishes to fund multiple schools that have an admissions pipeline (e.g. a new middle school that receives students from an affiliated “feeder” elementary school) it must request a waiver from the provision in ESEA 5202(d)(1) that limits a charter school to receiving just one subgrant.
The Department has no objection to one governing board overseeing multiple charter schools, provided that the board exercises appropriate oversight and monitoring of each school.
Can you fund this growth?
A lottery is a random selection process by which applicants are admitted to the charter school.
A charter school receiving CSP funds must use a lottery if more students apply than can be admitted.
Must include all eligible applicants for admission.
May only exempt students deemed already admitted.
Current Lottery Guidance
Students deemed already admitted:
Students who are enrolled in a public school at the time it is converted into a public charter school.
Students who are eligible to attend, and are living in the attendance area of, a public school at the time it is converted into a public charter school. “At the time” means the first year as a charter school.
Siblings of students already admitted to or attending the same charter school.
Children of a charter school’s founders, teachers, and staff
Children of employees at a work-site charter school
Current Lottery Guidance
Weighted Lotteries:
Guidance updated in January 2014 to clarify circumstances in which charter schools receiving CSP funds may use weighted lotteries in admissions, specifically for educationally disadvantaged students.
Weighted lotteries (lotteries that give additional weight to individual students who are identified as part of a specified set of students, but do not reserve or set-aside seats for students) are permitted only in certain circumstances.
Current Lottery Guidance
Weighted Lotteries:
Existing grantees may request approval to allow
weighted lotteries as described in the Guidance by
amending their grant applications. An applicant for
future CSP competitions that wishes to use a
weighted lottery should provide the same
information in its grant application.
Section E-3a of the Guidance describes the
information that must be included in the request.
Current Lottery Guidance
Areas of Concern:
• Preferences, whether geographic or for special populations
• State-mandated geographic preferences should be discussed with your program officer
• Preferences for educationally disadvantaged students that are not weighted lotteries
• Lack of policy on “small percentage” for students of teachers and other staff
Current Lottery Guidance
When recruiting students, charter schools should:
• Target all segments of the parent community.
• Give each student an equal opportunity to attend the school.
• Recruit in a manner that does not discriminate.
• Consider additional recruitment efforts towards groups that might otherwise have limited opportunities to participate in the program.
• Guidance specifically includes English learners and students with disabilities as possible outreach targets.
Current Lottery Guidance
46
Questions
Funding Restrictions and Other Requirements
Replication and expansionCost principlesInternal controlsProperty Management and Inventory Requirements (Disposition) Revisions of Budget & Program Plans
Replication and Expansion Grantee Restrictions
A charter school that receives funds under the Replication and Expansion competition is ineligible to receive funds for the same purpose under section 5202(c)(2) of the ESEA.
Replication and Expansion Grantees
Achievement First, Inc.
Across the Bridge Foundation
Alliance College Ready Public Schools
Aspire Public Schools
Baltimore Curriculum Project
Breakthrough Charter Schools
DC Preparatory
Democracy Prep Public Schools
Einstein Group, Inc.
Gestalt Community Schools
Great Oaks Foundation, Inc.
Green Dot Public Schools
IDEA Public Schools
KIPP Foundation
Replication and Expansion Grantees
Lawndale Educational and Regional Network
LEAD Public Schools, Inc.
Mastery Charter High School
Noble Network of Charter Schools
Propel Schools Foundation
RePublic Schools and RePublic Schools Nashville
Rhode Island mayoral Academy Blackstone Valley
Rocketship
Success Academy Charter Schools, Inc
Uncommon Schools, Inc.
UP Education Network, Inc.
Uplift Education
West Denver Prep DBA STRIVE Preparatory Schools
YES Prep Public Schools
Uniform Guidance
Cost Principles
2 CFR 225 (A-87)
2 CFR 230 (A-122)
Cost Principles – Funding Restrictions
Costs charged to a Federal grant must be:
1. Allowable - Permitted or not specifically prohibited
2. Allocable - Assignable to the project – in total, or distributed based on proportional benefits
3. Reasonable - Passes the “prudent” person test• Ordinary and necessary• Comparable with market prices• Same practices for incurring costs for federally
funded and other projects
The previous A-87 and A-122 Cost Principle Circulars have been combined in the Uniform Guidance.
Federal Cost Principles
Cost principles for many items are described in 2 CFR 200.420-200.475
See guidance for spending on meetings:2 CFR 200.432 & ED’s “Use of Federal Grant Funds for Conferences and Meetings”
FAQ on conferences and meetings: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/fund/guid/gposbul/gposbul.html. Use of Federal funds for food, beverage, or snacks requires a very high burden of proof to show that it is necessary.
Meetings must be:
• Consistent with approved application
• Held to disseminate technical information
• An efficient &effective way to achieve result
Questions
Internal Controls Requirements
Grantees must:
Establish & maintain internal controls that provide reasonable assurance that they are managing the grant in compliance with laws, terms & conditions
Comply with laws, terms & conditions
Evaluate their compliance
Act on non-compliance e.g., audit findings
Safeguard PII and sensitive information
Standards for Internal Control
Uniform Guidance identifies this guidance:
“Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” aka the GAO “Green Book” Comptroller General of the United States http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/665712.pdf
“Internal Control Integrated Framework” Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
http://www.coso.org/documents/990025P_Executive_Summary_final_may20_e.pdf
Internal Controls for Grant Expenditures
Grantees should have written procedures for expending funds in their budget categories:
Salaries
Benefits
Travel
Equipment
Supplies
Contracts
Indirect Costs
Training Stipends
Property Management and Inventory Requirements
In addition to procedures for purchasing equipment and supplies, procedures for tracking and inventories are necessary as well.
Inventories should occur every 2 years.
At the end of the grant, be able to document any equipment or supplies with a residual value of $5,000 or more.
Be able to report whether the items are still needed for project purposes, or to request disposition instructions.
Asset Disposition
CSP subgrant is closed out properly
Develop written procedures and guidelines to assist charter schools that close
Guidelines may address various issues, including the transfer of student records, protection of personal information, placement of students in other public schools, and appropriate disposition of the charter school’s assets.
See, generally, the Uniform Guidance closeout procedures at 2 CFR 200.343-200.345.
The Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.313 and 200.314
Define equipment as tangible property with a per unit acquisition cost of greater than $5,000, or, if the SEA or subgrantee has a lower capitalization threshold, a per unit acquisition cost that exceeds that lower threshold. See 2 CFR 200.33.
Asset Disposition
Subgrantee inventory that, at the time of disposition, does not exceed $5,000, or a lower threshold established by the State or the subgrantee, would be classified as supplies.
If there are unused supplies with a total aggregate value exceeding $5,000 when a charter school closes, and the supplies are not needed for any other Federal award, the SEA (or charter school subgrantee) must use the supplies for other activities or sell them.
Asset Disposition
Questions
63
Revisions
Changes Requiring Approval
Seek program officer’s approval prior to:
Changes in project scope or objectives
Subbing out substantive work of the grant
Changes in key personnel
Project director disengaged for 3+ months or 25%+ reduction in time
Changes in amount of matching funds
Transfer of funds budgeted for participant support to other expenses
Grantee Flexibilities
Pre-award costs
Carryover
Budget transfers
Time extensions
2 CFR Section
200.308
34 CFR Sections
75.261 and 75.264
Carryover
Unexpended funds are “forwarded”without prior approval for any allowable cost within the approved scope of the project
Complete unfinished activities
New activities within scope
ED Program Officer may request a written statement about how the funds will be used
Large amounts will require written explanation
Budget Transfer
Prior approval is generally not required to transferbudget across budget categories
Exceptions in 2 CFR 200.308…Prior approval is needed: For training funds or Transfer or contracting work
Prior approval is needed if more than 10% of a budget line is being transferred between budget categories.
Time Extension
In the final year of a grant…
One-time extension for up to one year without prior approval.
Written notice to program office is required:
No later than 10 days before project ends
State reasons for extension & revised end date
Time Extension Restrictions
Not just for using unexpended funds
No additional federal funds
No change to scope or objectives
Questions
Reporting and Monitoring
A N N U A L P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T
Due on a yearly basis, prior to the beginning of the next budget period. Required for grant continuation.
F E D E R A L F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T ( I F A P P L I C A B L E )
F I N A L P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R TDue 90 days after the end of the grant
performance period. Required to close grant out in compliance.
O N G O I N G U P D A T E SQuarterly Calls
DATA COLLECTIONDue at the same time as the APR and FPR
MONITORING (onsite)
G5 DRAWDOWNS
STATE AUDITS
Overall Monitoring
Program office will:
Monitor spending in G5
Review financial and performance reports
Review other reports (such as audits)
Call or visit
Monitoring Goal:
To identify performance or financial issues
G5 Monitoring Report: Excessive Drawdowns
General indicators of excessive draw
1st Quarter More than 50%
2nd Quarter More than 80%
3rd Quarter 100%
Unspent cash must be returned
Interest may be charged
G5 Monitoring Report:Large Available Balance
Large balances might indicate project is not moving forward
Key indicator is 70% or more of funds left within 90 days before end of the budget period
Reason for balance will be clarified before any continuation award will be made
Annual Performance Report
Recipients of multi-year discretionary awards must submit an annual grant performance report to receive continuation funding.
Reports due 6-8 months from the beginning of the performance period (currently April 1).
Progress to date towards completion of goals and objectives identified in the application.
Accounting of funds expended, and funds to be expended in upcoming year.
Requests for budget changes, supplemental funds, or activity changes for continuation.
Annual Performance Report
Things to note:
Two components of your annual report:
Data Collection Form
ED 524B Form
Both annual and final performance reports use the 524B Form with 4 parts:
Cover Sheet & Executive Summary
Section A – Project Status Chart
Section B – Budget
Section C - Additional Information
this includes your Pipeline update
Submitting the APR
ED 524B reports are designed to be submitted through the G5 system.
Reports are due by 4:30 PM (Washington, DC time) on April 1, 2016.
When submitting, save a copy of the report for your records.
Data Collection
Data Collection Form
Collects information on awarded subgrants: school names and locations, NCES ID, LEA, CMO or EMO (if applicable), performance period dates, amounts awarded.
Allows for tracking of CSP fund use and analysis with other data systems.
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/charter/cspdata.pdf
Continuation Funding
Congress has appropriated sufficient funds under the program;
The grantee has made substantial progress toward meeting the objectives of the project, or obtained approval of changes to the project activities from the program official in order to make substantial progress toward achieving project objectives in the future;
The grantee has sent to ED every required report (including the annual performance report);
Continuation Funding
The program staff has determined that continuing funding for the grant is in the best interest of the federal government (e.g. the program staff believe the project continues serve the priorities of the program);
The grantee has met the conditions of previous awards [75.217(s)(3)(iii)]; and
The grantee’s management practices and financial accounting systems are adequate to provide appropriate stewardship of federal funds (74.21).
Quarterly Calls
An official, scheduled check-in with your program officer on the following:
Potential changes to project or budget
Updates on activities or charter sector
Questions about grant
Timeline: February
May
August
November
Monitoring
Monitoring
Typically once during a grant performance period.
Performed onsite, covering specific program indicators.
Provide documentation to support compliance and performance.
Final report determines corrective action plans to address any findings.
Technical Assistance and Resources
Technical Assistance and Resources
CSP Resources - http://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/charter-schools/
Data Set and Analysis
Grantee Award Information
Audit Report Links
Past Competition Information
Dear Colleague Letters
Technical Assistance and Resources
National Charter School Resource Center
www.charterschoolcenter.org/
SEA Community of Practice Webinars
SEA COP Portal
If you do not have access to the SEA COP Portal, please let your program officer know!
Technical Assistance and Resources
Uniform Guidance
• This final guidance is located in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-12-26/pdf/2013-30465.pdf
• OMB Analysis and “crosswalks” comparing the current circulars to the proposed revisions (now codified).http://www2.ed.gov/policy/fund/guid/uniform-guidance/index.html
Crosswalk from existing guidance to proposed guidance
Administrative Requirements Text Comparison
Cost Principles Text Comparison
Audit Requirements Text Comparison
Important Reminders
Check grant terms, conditions and grant award
attachments for possible exceptions
When in doubt, call your Program Officer
CSP Contacts
Stefan [email protected](202) 453-6384
Erin [email protected](202) 205-3525
Amy [email protected](202) 453-6634
Kathryn [email protected](202) 401-2266
Leslie [email protected](202) 205-8524
Questions