1 The Alchemists Author’s Prologue I personally favour the smooth unctuousness of the velvet glove when approaching a mystery that warrants a solution. There is a paradox at the heart of our modern perception of history. On the one hand we view with lofty scorn the unscientific mish-mash of legend and fable that once passed for ‘history’. We imagine that over the past 500 years, with our libraries, our Records offices, our armies of industrious scholars sifting the facts, that we have developed a much more rigorous scientific approach to ‘evidence’, with the implication that somehow we are always getting nearer to a definitive view of the truth and ‘what really happened – what is the solution ... in history’ On the other hand we can look back at the same 500 years of writing History, -an ambitious survey- and nothing may strike us as forcefully as the fact that the conventional historians have really been looking at the past through the distorting glass of their own age and perceptions, their prejudices and or personal limitations. Inevitably perspectives and fashions change and other quite cogent interpretations or sets of facts emerge, as the previous erstwhile sagas should be appropriately cast aside mercilessly. I perceive Alan and Baram as Alchemists inter-alia. Fascinating historical detectives, vastly experienced and proficient, armed with a modern method of historical analysis and evaluation of primary evidence. Much of their framework is filled in a workmanlike manner rather than in an inspired fashion. For instance any who have read Buckle’s ‘History of Civilization’, which pleased his fellow Victorians so much, with its view of history as a climb out from superstitious ignorance to the elevated heights of Victorian enlightenment, will recall that he became a household name even though he completed only two of his projected sixteen volumes. By contrast there is the poignant story of Lord Acton who held fashionable Victorian friends spellbound as he spoke of his great planned ‘History of Liberty’, for which he had assembled a mass of material, but he died leaving mere lecture notes and his famous misquoted dictum, “All power tends to corrupt.” These are simply a few of my own personal investigations into the History of writing History before I began to collaborate with Wilson and Blackett. I have encountered closed minds that are violently dismissive of anything new or different. Hasty recapitulation is the order of the day when university employees are confounded with fresh evidence – no matter how cogent. I found with relief the humanity and the good sense of C V Wedgewood when she sums up the story of modern History with the words: - “When a new discipline and techniques of Historical research were turned on the variously agreed fables which had served men for several generations these fables naturally disintegrated, they were replaced by new, better, and more truthful fables, but by further argument –History like other forms of art, had entered into a period of abstraction.” The Alchemists expose incompetence, apathy, and sometimes, even corruption. They have skilfully combined alchemy with science, a new albeit original method with the historical research as their foundation. There is an irony in the kind of splendour of having stood, and even fought for, the right thing. Doing and not just thinking of doing, creates the world for the better. If the truth of our cultural heritage, of our country, of our roots, is lost, then we as a society are doomed. I advocate niceties, but those are not going to produce anything of social value, or of literary substance of enduring value. Grant Berkley Dublin 2005
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
The Alchemists
Author’s Prologue
I personally favour the smooth unctuousness of the velvet glove when approaching a mystery that warrants
a solution.
There is a paradox at the heart of our modern perception of history. On the one hand we view with lofty
scorn the unscientific mish-mash of legend and fable that once passed for ‘history’. We imagine that over
the past 500 years, with our libraries, our Records offices, our armies of industrious scholars sifting the
facts, that we have developed a much more rigorous scientific approach to ‘evidence’, with the implication
that somehow we are always getting nearer to a definitive view of the truth and ‘what really happened –
what is the solution ... in history’
On the other hand we can look back at the same 500 years of writing History, -an ambitious survey- and
nothing may strike us as forcefully as the fact that the conventional historians have really been looking at
the past through the distorting glass of their own age and perceptions, their prejudices and or personal
limitations.
Inevitably perspectives and fashions change and other quite cogent interpretations or sets of facts emerge,
as the previous erstwhile sagas should be appropriately cast aside mercilessly. I perceive Alan and Baram
as Alchemists inter-alia. Fascinating historical detectives, vastly experienced and proficient, armed with a
modern method of historical analysis and evaluation of primary evidence. Much of their framework is filled
in a workmanlike manner rather than in an inspired fashion. For instance any who have read Buckle’s
‘History of Civilization’, which pleased his fellow Victorians so much, with its view of history as a climb
out from superstitious ignorance to the elevated heights of Victorian enlightenment, will recall that he
became a household name even though he completed only two of his projected sixteen volumes.
By contrast there is the poignant story of Lord Acton who held fashionable Victorian friends spellbound as
he spoke of his great planned ‘History of Liberty’, for which he had assembled a mass of material, but he
died leaving mere lecture notes and his famous misquoted dictum, “All power tends to corrupt.”
These are simply a few of my own personal investigations into the History of writing History before I
began to collaborate with Wilson and Blackett. I have encountered closed minds that are violently
dismissive of anything new or different. Hasty recapitulation is the order of the day when university
employees are confounded with fresh evidence – no matter how cogent.
I found with relief the humanity and the good sense of C V Wedgewood when she sums up the story of
modern History with the words: -
“When a new discipline and techniques of Historical research were turned on the variously agreed fables
which had served men for several generations these fables naturally disintegrated, they were replaced by
new, better, and more truthful fables, but by further argument –History like other forms of art, had entered
into a period of abstraction.”
The Alchemists expose incompetence, apathy, and sometimes, even corruption. They have skilfully
combined alchemy with science, a new albeit original method with the historical research as their
foundation. There is an irony in the kind of splendour of having stood, and even fought for, the right thing.
Doing and not just thinking of doing, creates the world for the better.
If the truth of our cultural heritage, of our country, of our roots, is lost, then we as a society are doomed. I
advocate niceties, but those are not going to produce anything of social value, or of literary substance of
enduring value.
Grant Berkley Dublin 2005
2
MOSES IN THE HIEROGLYPHS
Introduction.
Our cultural heritage enshrined in the histories with a quality spanning three thousand five hundred years, a
birthright of Britain, Europe, and America, has been almost lost in a murky scholastic masquerade. The fact
that the entire 3500 years old continuous History of a Nation in Western Europe has been abandoned in the
Twentieth Century will probably come as a surprise to most readers. What remains from the destruction
wreaked in the name of political and religious correctness, is now regarded as “folklore” and as nonsense
tales, and the remarkable preserved Histories of Britain lay mouldering and gathering dust.
Selective emphasis and due embellishment by fundamentalist political and religious bigotry, armed with
their deceptive rhetoric and the advantages of ignorance has deprived generations of the Nation’s citizens
of the fruits of their glittering past. Fortunately the older generations have preserved the truth and a great
number of local ancient relics and sites still remain. It was natural that Alan Wilson should begin to
question this, beginning in 1956, and he was joined in this exploration by Baram Blackett in 1976.
Formally relegated to the status of mere folklore and myths, and left to gather dust in the never visited
archives and in private collections, and in the secret avoided places of academia, the priceless histories
have remained silent. At last there is revealed in this book a sublime work of re-activated inspiration that
reveals the miraculous power of regeneration.
The paradox is self-evident. The passing bullock has indifferently trampled all over the bright flowers and
butterflies, leaving behind only a mud-hole. Around AD 1750 there was an increasing interest in “British
History”, possibly fuelled by the growth of Empire and the possibilities that opened up by the expanding
marvels of the techniques of book publishing. There were however problems as at least 95 % of “British
History” was locked away in Welsh Manuscripts that were generally unavailable and there was no national
archive as Parliament assiduously set up for England and Scotland. So the surviving Welsh Manuscripts
were privately owned, with some families having one or two, others a few more, and some collectors who
were determined to preserve the past had as many as several hundred, and these relics were jealously
guarded and kept out of sight. Some manuscripts had been lent to a notable scholar, and he broke his
solemn agreement to return them. When he died this thief actually bequeathed what was not his to a
University and to a Cathedral library. Sadly the whole corpus of these manuscripts gradually faded into
obscurity.
The need to “create” a suitable past for the growing imperial state required that a suitably grandiose History
should be written, and this was done at Oxford, Cambridge, and London. The fabricators of this exercise in
highly imaginative ingenuity were aided by the huge advantage of at least 95 % total ignorance of what was
actually in the preserved records. It would not have mattered much if they had knowledge, as the project to
invent a suitable history demanded that it should reflect greatness on the part of the dominant group was the
over-riding necessity.
In the 20th Century the politicians “centralised” education and so out went British History in 1922 –1924.
There was no need for British history going back 3500 years, when that history could be replaced by a
brand new invented version.
None-the-less the British history was preserved, but as it was at variance with the vainglorious imaginative
product fabricated by the religiously and politically biased Cambridge and Oxford writers, it was now
attacked. When colleges were again re-established in Wales in the mid to late 19th Century they were
staffed by those who were taught in Oxford and Cambridge. Finally, in the 1930’s this resulted in an
eruption and an onslaught by an ambitious and misguided country yokel from North Wales. This idiot
actually believed the English version of ancient British History, and he managed to get himself onto the
BBC London State controlled monopoly Radio. From this prestigious theatre he weekly blasted out Dr
Goebbels like tirades against the relevant and accurate historical records, completely unopposed. This
tragically and quite literally destroyed the reputation and the integrity of ancient British History.
3
Amongst the treasures thrown away are the Ancient Migration Stories and the Ancient British Alphabets,
that Julius Caesar, Strabo. Ammianus Marcellinus, and others recorded. These were all alleged to be forged
around AD 1800, and at the same time as these tirades sent shock waves across the airways, in 1946 a five
foot high clay jar containing an entire Gnostic Christian Library was dug up at Nag Hamadi in Egypt. This
collection of ancient texts was buried before AD 400 and it contained a description of the Alphabet that
was allegedly forged in 1800. So finally having found every other aspect of preserved British History to be
truthful and accurate, Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett began to research these records. In 1793 Edward
Williams had compared the British with the indecipherable Etruscan and Pelasgian Alphabets, and this near
identicality of these Alphabets was published by John Williams in 1846, and by D. Delta Evans in 1906. In
1904 E O Gordon again published the correlation and quoted Bunsen. It did not take long to discover that
the ancient migration trails of the British people were littered with ancient inscriptions. Fortunately the
Bard Llewellyn Sion had preserved the ciphers of the Coelbren Alphabet, and so, armed with (a) the
Alphabet signs, (b) their modern Latin alphabet equivalents, (c) the correct language, it was possible to read
the ancient messages on stones and artefacts in Britain, in Etrurian Italy, in Rhaetian Switzerland, in the
Aegean, in Asia Minor, further east into Assyria, and down into Palestine, back to around 800 BC.
As the English language, alphabet, culture, religion, and heritage, were all transplanted to Australia, New
Zealand, South Africa, Canada, and North America, so also our British ancestors left their records along
their path to Britain. The people moved on or were assimilated, but the mute inscribed stones remained. It
is possible to correctly decipher and read the “indecipherable” Etruscan in Italy, and Rhaetian in
Switzerland, and also the Aegean and Asia Minor, and other inscriptions, and the Story and the proving
Manuscripts are completed and available for publication.
The claim that every known language was tried in attempts to read Etruscan is not true, and the British
Language was never tried.
In 1984 other matters then needed attention, and an ancient Triad stated that there was a connection
between the British -Khumric language and the ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphics. In Bangor Professor Sir
John Morris Jones wrote a thesis in 1898 in which he compared the complex syntax of Khumric with the
exactly matching Ancient Egyptian. Sir Norman Lockyear had set up a team in Cambridge around 1908 to
try to investigate these ancient British records of origin, but sadly the 1914-1918 Great War had ended that
effort. However, the German 19th Century scholar Bunsen had proclaimed the founding connection between
ancient British Khumric and the Egyptian Hieroglyphics, but no one took any notice in Britain. This was all
totally ignored because the real British History does not fit in any way, or shape, with the fabricated history
that was invented in the mid 19th Century.
What emerged was that the J F Champollion system of decipherment of 1822 is not correct and it has
serious flaws and inaccuracies that results in misreadings. The theory of using a cocktail mixture of Coptic-
Hamatic Arabic-Hebrew, aided occasionally by Greek, to decipher the Hieroglyphs is inadequate. In
driving from New York to Los Angeles it only takes one wrong turning to end up in either Florida or
Alaska. All that is required to read the Hieroglyphics is the one correct language, and that Language is
certainly not Coptic, nor Hebrew, nor Hamatic-Arabic.
The Oxford & Cambridge cobbled together version of British History does not match with Roman or other
records, and it is obviously incorrect. Equally scholars are aware that the chronology of Ancient Egyptian
History is incorrect by several centuries. As Egyptian historical chronology is used to “establish” the dating
of all other ancient chronologies, using wars, royal intermarriages, trade, and treaties, it is no surprise that
the histories of every ancient Nation around the Mediterranean and in the Near East is in chaos before 600
BC, with inexplicable blank eras and Dark Age gaps of 500 –600 years, and strange repetitions and
dislocations. So Wilson and Blackett decided to attempt to decipherment and translation of the Ancient
Egyptian Hieroglyphics using the Khumric “Welsh” as the basic Language, and this was found to work
brilliantly, and consistently. Why would an old Bard or Monk writing 900- 1000 years ago, and almost
certainly relying on older texts, make such a claim? Answer, because it is true. Everything else that had
been so carelessly abandoned was correct, and it would have been a surprise if this attempt at decipherment
were not equally accurate.
4
The claim that every known Language was tried in attempts to read the Egyptian Hieroglyphics is not true.
The British Khumric Language was never tried.
Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett are both Christians (Blackett a Roman Catholic) are concerned that
Christian values are being undermined, yet out of the Egyptian decipherments spring Joseph, and Moses,
and Benjamin, and Solomon and Sheba. Read the British Histories preserved in Wales and the connections
with ancient Egypt are clear. Intelligent research proves the old records to be precise and accurate. What we
now have available is a marvellous tool with which diligent historians may unlock the secrets of the past.
No other Nation on Earth has ever denigrated its own native history in the manner as has happened in
Britain. The tragedy is that whenever it is possible to check the facts, the outcome is always verification
and vindication of the Ancient British records. Discarding ancient Khumric history is an indignation and a
catastrophic loss with huge repercussion, not only for Britain but also for all Nations that have British and
European links and origins.
5
Moses in the Hieroglyphs.
The Darkness Factor
The decision that was taken in 1984 to attempt to use the Khumric British language to decipher the Ancient
Egyptian Hieroglyphics stemmed from several promptings.
First there was an Ancient British tradition that the Language was somehow connected to Egypt. An
ancient Triad records “the stones of Gwydion Gan Hebdon, upon which all the knowledge of the world is
written”, and this has always been believed to mean that these are the hieroglyphic inscriptions of Ancient
Egypt. The implication being that these inscriptions could be read using Khumric-Welsh. Secondly, Sir
John Morris Jones had taken the trouble to write a thesis in 1898 demonstrating the near identicality of
Khumric and Ancient Egyptian syntax.
More importantly the much derided and abused ancient British Coelbren Alphabet had been many times
stated to be identical with allegedly indecipherable Etruscan, Rhaetian, Pelasgian, and so on. Principally by
Edward Williams in 1793, by John Williams published in 1846, and by D Delta Evans in 1906, and finally
again by E O Gordon quoting Bunsen in 1914. The exercise into deciphering and translating these ancient
inscribed texts back along the ancient British migration trails as detailed in our histories, had proved to be
brilliantly successful, leading back from Britain through to Etruria, to the Aegean, to Asia Minor, to
Northern Iran, to Palestine, of around 800 BC. The further east and the further back in time, these messages
in these deciphered texts not only matched with known histories, but they also pointed directly at Egypt.
Beginning in the 1950’s a number of books have been written exposing the disaster in the chronology of
Ancient Egypt. The academic establishment puts on a brave face, but the problem is growing as 500 –600
years long yawning gaps and phantom ages are continuously appearing in all the ancient histories of all the
nations associated with Egypt. Because the Egyptian model of chronology is used to set and establish all
other ancient histories the problem is to contain the widespread chaos that is resulting.
The logic is that as there are hundreds of thousands of ancient texts of all sorts in Egypt, and it is claimed
that these can be successfully read, “why is it then that there is any problem”? The Khumric ‘Welsh’ and
the ancient Egyptian have the same seven vowels A.E.I.O.U.W.Y. In Ancient Egyptian “nefer hotep”
means “heaven beloved”, and in Khumric “nefol hoffiant” means “heaven beloved”, and in fact the other
similarities are endless. It was therefore reasoned by Wilson and Blackett that the claims made by J F
Champollion that he knew how to correctly read the hieroglyphics were (to say the least) somewhat
exaggerated. If the Egyptian texts were read correctly then there should be none of the all too well known
“Dark Ages” littered throughout all ancient chronology.
6
7
The first phase was therefore to carry out a detailed check up on the methods used by Champollion, Ipolitto
Rosselini, Wallis-Budge, and others, in establishing the alleged “system” of decipherment and translation.
This turned out to be an excursion into an Alice in Blunderland comic scenario. All that emerged was a
heap of guesswork, assumptions, and surmises, which sooner or later solidified into alleged facts. Coptic
was definitely not the basic language of the hieroglyphics as is confidently claimed, and the “system” of
using a cocktail of Coptic, Hebrew, and Aramaic, and so on, to decipher was an absurdity.
The first attempts to use the British Language as the tool with which to read the hieroglyphics was instantly
successful. The total difference was that this “Forward Working” by simply identifying the object shown in
the hieroglyph and chasing the word through the Khumric ‘Welsh’ dictionaries worked. Previous attempts
have been “Backward Working”, by searching for words to apply to the hieroglyphics. It was soon obvious
that the hieroglyphics after c 306 BC, in the Ptolemaic era, had become diluted or contaminated with the
introduction of Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, and later Latin words. So the apparent results from the Rosetta
Stone and the Canopus Decree were misleading.
Various exercises were set up and the decipherment of the names of the gods, and of the Pharaohs and
Queens, and other nobility, quickly led to a confidence to attempt longer texts. The first long text that was
attempted produced a shock, for although the inscription read out easily, the information that it undoubtedly
contained was of around 600 BC, yet the previous and much quoted view was that it was of around 1200
BC. This almost caused the Project to be abandoned, as previous experience of academics had been too
painful to bear, and another “spitting match” with closed minds was not required. The evidence from this
inscription was a confirmation of hypothesis that was published in 1950, and the author had been
mercilessly witch-hunted in disgraceful personal attacks, whilst the facts were ignored. Even stricter
secrecy was therefore imposed.
Very valuable historical information emerged from the decipherments, and the temptation to proceed
proved to be too strong however, and so a programme of seeking out Target Names was adopted in order to
direct scarce resources into what might be the most profitable directions. One target was the Queen named
as Nitocris and as Nicaule in no less than eight ancient sources, including Flavius Josephus (c AD 80), the
Bible, the Kebra Nagast of Ethiopia, Herodotus (c 450 BC) and so on. Nitocris and Nicaule are the names
of the fabled Queen of Sheba, and the steles and the texts containing the Cartouche of Nitocris-Nicaule
were located. Photographs of these were obtained and the work of decipherment and translation went on
smoothly.
Again very valuable historical information emerged, but when compared with the conventional academic
dates, the dates that emerged were different by several centuries. A mini Project was set up to examine the
chronological ramifications of these results. References to Solomon are clear, and the information from the
decipherments is solid.
Time out was taken to check the work of the much ignored ancient Arab Historians and again the picture
that emerged was one where the ancient Arab scholars were generally right, and the modern 19th century
Egyptologists were generally anything between 600 –1000 years wrong in most of their ancient historical
chronology. What was already clear was that the strange Dark Ages in the ancient histories of Greece and
Asia Minor and elsewhere, with their inexplicable 600 years yawning gaps when no one lived, nothing
happened, and nothing was made or built, were disappearing.
Another group of royal names in the hieroglyphics attracted attention as this group contained names that
read out as Hercules, Perdicas, Cleomenes, Nearchus, Craterus, and so on. Hercules was the eldest son of
Alexander the Great by his common law wife Barsine. Nearchus was the son-in-law, close friend, and
Admiral, of Alexander. Perdicas and Craterus were close relatives and were the Regents of the Macedonian
Empire after Alexander’s death in 322 BC, whilst Cleomenes was the Greek appointed by Alexander as the
Governor/ Satrap of Egypt. The immediate problem was that all these persons were being dated at between
700 to 800 years too early by the Egyptologists. So another mini-Project was set up to deal with this and
Alexander was duly traced to his tomb. Again the information emerging confirmed the chronological
disorder, and these persons had been wrongly dated to 1085- 945BC instead of between 332 –306 BC.
8
There can be no doubt at all about this. The Champollion based attempts at these names and texts were
totally ludicrous.
It takes no imagination to see that any research that results in criticism of the demi-god of the religion of
archaeology, J F Champollion, will result in the usual mindless fury from academia. None-the-less, he is he
author of this giant catastrophe that has devastated the histories of every nation and country of the ancient
world. Basically, the problem is that around 80 % of ancient Egyptian History has been duplicated. Whole
Dynasties are re-recorded under different names of the same kings. All this was pointed out in detail 40 –
50 years ago, and there was no civilized debate.
Then there was a stroke of luck, as it sometimes happens, and the name of a great non-royal potentate
named as Mwseff was found. This caused the usual dry phlegmatic approach to the findings to quicken in
pace, for in old Khumric ‘Welsh’ texts Mwseff is Moses. This derives from “mwys = basket” and “ef” =
“he, him”. This meant that there was a massive stone carved text available for decipherment concerning
Mwseff = Moses. Not only that, there were several other carved and painted hieroglyphic texts and also
statuary and a huge tomb complex in Egypt. This again required a mini-Project within the Project, and the
information that emerges from this is priceless. Checks were run against the Jewish Talmud stories, against
ancient Arab history, the related Babylonian Khassite history, and everything else that was possible.
Always the record emerging and being read stood up to whatever comparison test could be made.
No one could find Moses using Champollion’s “Egyptospeak” because it does not work correctly. He got
things wrong. The Pharaoh of the Exodus and his family were traced, and everything slots in together with
the known histories of Babylon, the Hittites, and elsewhere. The Moses texts are currently misdated at
around 2400 BC and they should be of around 1400- 1300 BC. It would be equally difficult to find
Napoleon in histories dated at around AD 800, and George Washington would disappear if he was sought
in AD 1500.
What had been creeping out from all directions was the comprehensive evidence of duplications and
misdatings of the famed 18th and 19
th Dynasties of Egypt. These Dynasties had been the subject of the first
long text decipherment that had alarmed Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett, and so once again there was a
major effort required. The shape of the emerging history of Egypt follows the pattern as set down by
ancient historians, and the endless archaeological confusions in Palestine, the Lebanon, Syria, Asia Minor,
and in several other ancient countries are resolved. Everything takes its rightful place once the correct
chronology and the correct order of the Dynasties of Ancient Egypt is established.
The Trojan War crept out of the mists of time and became unavoidable at circa 650 BC, precisely when the
Roman, British, Frankish, and Jewish records indicated. Again this was hived off into a new Project in its
own right. So it went on with the targeting of inscriptions on the ancient stelae by identifying key names.
One day Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett were surprised to hear that an 80 years old retired railway
worker, Reg Stuart, had also somehow worked out the connection between ancient Britain and Egypt, and
he had published a 24 page booklet on the Narmer Palette. It had not occurred to Blackett and Wilson
before this, that if the Khumric Language was the correct Language with which to read the hieroglyphics,
then it should be possible to read even the earliest known texts. So it as decided that a decipherment –not an
interpretation- of the famed 1st Dynasty ‘Narmer Palette’ should be attempted. This was done and the
Forward Working system of decipherment again worked with no problems.
All manner of decipherments were made and piled up, but the modern era is the age of conformity, and no
one is allowed to dare to question the established order. The fact that the established order is in chaos does
not matter. Out of all this comes a correct ancient chronology that emerges of its own volition. All the
phantom people and events of the duplicated records in all the other histories disappear. All the chasms of
the Dark Ages of 500 –600 – 700 years that disfigure all the ancient histories disappear.
Our ancestors have been telling us how to read the hieroglyphics and much more for at least 1000 years,
and no one has taken any notice. We now have a marvellous tool available for historians to use to unlock
the secrets of the past.
9
Moses in the Hieroglyphs. Chapter One. Part One.
King Arthur and the Pharaohs of Egypt.
The fact that researchers identifying the two British Kings named Arthur I son of Magnus Maximus, and
Arthur II son of King Meurig should somehow be led along a long forgotten historical trail leading back in
time and distance from Britain to ancient Etruria and Rhaetia, (Italy and Switzerland), and then further back
to the Aegean and Asia Minor and on to ancient Armenia and Assyria around 730 BC and finally to
Palestine, may at first appear strange. The idea that there is a solid link between Britain and Ancient Egypt
will undoubtedly appear to be a little strange to some readers. It certainly does not fit with the political
histories, which have masqueraded as factual for the past two centuries or more in Britain.
Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett spent years tracing the ancient British Coelbren Alphabets back along the
migration trail set out in the politically and religiously discarded ancient British Khumry Histories, and
proving the ancient British histories of migration to be correct. Just as in the modern era the English
language, and the associated legal system and religion, was transplanted from Britain around the world to
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, America, India, and parts of Africa and elsewhere, so also the migrating
ancestors of the British, known as the Khumry (Khumry ="Welsh") and the earlier Ealde Cyrcenas (Old
Syrians), left traces of their writing and culture along their migration routes.
The ancient British Alphabet was traced back to the Aegean and Asia Minor, and to Etruria (Italy) and
Rhaetia (Switzerland), where half the nation migrated from Asia Minor around 650 BC, leaving the other
half to sail to Britain in c 504 BC. The same people, with their same Alphabet and Language, were the
Kimmeroi and the Kimmerians of the ancient Greeks, who crossed over Asia Minor in the c 690 -650 BC
period. These same Khumry were recorded in the annals and archives of the Emperors of Assyria,
discovered by Austin Layard in 1846 at Nineveh. The Assyrian Emperors knew them as the same people
who they deported from ancient Israel in the 740 -700 BC era and called them the Khumry. Always the
same Language written in the same ancient Alphabet marks the passing of these same Khumry people.
As the Ciphers of the Coelbren Alphabet were preserved in a Manuscript of Llewellyn Sion around AD
1540, it is known which modern Alphabetic letter A. B. C, and so on, matches with its ancient counterpart
letter. In this way it is possible to decipher and to translate the ancient messages written in stone, on cloth,
on pottery, and so on. The obvious fact that emerges is that the British Khumry are demonstrably the "lost"
Ten Tribes of Israel. This leads to one more inevitable conclusion, and that is that the ancestors of the
British Khumry were at one period in Ancient Egypt, until Moses led them out around 1350 BC. This
caused Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett to start to look closely at Ancient Egypt.
All this is detailed in the volumes “The King Arthur Conspiracy”, and "The Holy Kingdom", and "Artorivs
Rex Discovered", and other volumes.
In 1898 Professor Sir John Morris Jones wrote a Thesis in which he demonstrated that the peculiar Syntax
of the Welsh-Khumric language was identical with that of Ancient Egypt. A strange finding. The same
seven vowels A.E.I.O.U.W and Y were also used. No one took much notice, as the Welsh are not a
"popular" cause. It did not take Wilson and Blackett very long to realise that both the ancient Egyptians and
the Khumry stated that their language was "the language of heaven". Also simple numbers of simple
phrases matched, like the Egyptian "Nefer Hotep", and the Khumric "Nefol Hoffiant", both meaning
"Heaven Beloved". Both nations also counted in Twenties, and seventy in Welsh is "Tri Ugain a Deg" or
Three Twenties and Ten. So there was the same Syntax, the same Seven Vowels, and numbers of matching
phrases.
Alan Wilson then remembered the ancient Triad which speaks of "the Stones of Gwydion Ganhebdon,
upon which all the knowledge of the World is written," and which has always been held to mean the stones
of Ancient Egypt plastered with the Hieroglyphics. If the Khumry had been in ancient Egypt in the 1550 -
1350 BC era, might there not be a link between the two ancient languages and the writing? This brought
about a study of the Sinatic inscriptions, and an immediate attempt to read the ancient Egyptian
Hieroglyphics in the Khumric language in 1984. Contrary to the false claim, which is routinely paraded,
10
that scholars tried every known language in attempts to decipher the Egyptian Hieroglyphics, the Khumric
language was never ever tried by anyone. The fact is that Coptic is not, and was not, the basic language of
the ancient Hieroglyphics, as proposed by J F Champollion. This was actually pointed out by the German
scholar Bunsen in the late 19th Century, and was then later reiterated by Wallis-Budge, in 1906, who wrote
openly: - "If only we knew the language." .
In 1914 E O Gordon wrote his "Prehistoric London" and quoted the notable German scholar Bunsen: -
"The Khumric language prevailed in different dialects over the whole of Europe and a large part of Asia. It
is the sub-structure of all the Keltic tongues and the archaic element in the Greek, the Sanskrit, and the
Hieroglyphic Egyptian (see Bunsen, "Christianity and Mankind", vol iv, page 158) .It is the key to the
affinity between the languages of the East and the West. All other languages can be traced to an alien
source - this alone cannot. It is certain that it was brought into Britain, as it was spoken by their forefathers
in Armenia 1700 BC, and that its purity and integrity have been guarded by them in all ages with jealous
care. It is the witness, above suspicion and corruption, to the extreme antiquity of their nationality and
civilization." (The underlining is inserted by the authors.)
If we leave aside the gross mistake of misidentifying the British Khumry as a "Keltic" nation, which almost
certainly results from following the weird theories emanating from Oxford and Cambridge Universities in
the mid 19th Century, we have an astonishing statement. In the light of this extraordinary claim made by
Bunsen, it is amazing that no one ever before has ever sought to make the language and alphabetic
comparisons, which Wilson and Blackett have made. An experimental attempt to read the ancient Egyptian
Hieroglyphics as being written in the British Khumric Language would only take a few hours at most, and
would require nothing more than intelligence and an unbiased mind, a clear photograph of an ancient
Egyptian Hieroglyphic inscription, an old Khumric-Welsh dictionary, a pen, and a few sheets of paper.
In 1949 the work of Dr W F Libby revealed to the startled world of historical and archaeological academia
the scientific possibility of accurately dating ancient artefacts, objects, and remains, which had once held
living material. Anything, which had once been living organic matter that was combustible could be dated
by establishing its current Radio Carbon 14 content. Dr Libby had established that there was a constant rate
of decline in the Radio Carbon 14 content of organic materials, amounting to a 50 % loss every year. This
meant that if the average amount of Radio Carbon 14 present in any tree ring in the year of its growth in
any ancient wooden item were to be measured, or the quantity remaining in human or animal tissue from
say ancient bodies buried in bogs or Egyptian mummies, an accurate dating could be established. This
required that the normal quantity of Radio Carbon 14 expected to be present at the time of death had to be
established and from then onwards the quantity of Radio Carbon 14 found in an ancient timber artefact or
an Egyptian mummy could be measured and by a simple mathematical calculation its age could be
established.
Dr Libby's discovery was at first hailed as a major breakthrough of the first magnitude, but there was a
problem. Dr Libby's proposal that after the death of any plant, animal or organism, the quantity of Radio
Carbon 14 accumulated during lifetime began to decay and was lost at a constant rate per annum, and
therefore could be calculated to the present date, seemed simple enough. It was considered necessary
however to construct a table of the Radio Carbon 14 quantities present in ancient artefacts, presumably to
verify the theory. This was in fact a near impossibility, as any Table of anticipated Radio Carbon 14
quantities could only be constructed from items whose age was already accurately known. Even timber
from a mediaeval cathedral would pose problems as ancient oak, and other long-lived hardwood trees, lived
to a great age, and therefore their inner rings were hundreds of years older than their outer rings. Added to
this is the problem that such timber could be seasoned for years before being used, and as valuable building
material it was often re-used. So even attempting to construct a Table of Content and dating from ancient
timber, scraps of clothing, mummy wrappings, preserved animal remains, and so on, was almost
impossible.
This hazardous situation was ignored, and the academic view, that the history and the chronology of
Ancient Egypt was firmly and very accurately established, prevailed. It was held that Ancient Egyptian
dating was impeccably correct, and that the remarkable dry preservative conditions natural to the Egyptian
climate, provided an unrivalled abundance of R.C.14 dateable materials. Mummies, mummified animals,
11
all manner of timber artefacts, and even straw and fruits from ancient tombs, were readily available. So on
the dangerous and false assumption that Egyptian Ancient History had been accurately worked out and
established beyond question, the cart was placed well and truly before the horse. Radio Carbon 14 values
were calculated and dated against the claimed "known dates" of Ancient Egyptian History. In fact there was
no way to verify these "known dates".
So the moribund stagnant pond of ancient studies remained in its normal state of turgid calm, and all was
well with the house of cards built upon quicksand. The absurdity of taking an item from an Egyptian tomb
and dating it at around 1320 BC and then measuring its Radio Carbon 14 content, and then "establishing"
that figure as a level for 1320 BC seemed to occur to no-one. It was even claimed that all was well with all
other ancient historical dates of Assyria, Hatti (the Hittites), Chaldea, Babylon, Mycenae, and elsewhere.
This would be because all these other chronologies were constructed around the Egyptian model being used
as the yardstick.
Basically all plant and animal organisms accumulate Radio Carbon 14 during their lifetimes. This process
ceases upon death, and there then ensues a slow measurable loss of the Radio Carbon 14 atoms that can
take around 11,000 years to complete. In short the quantity of Radio Carbon 14 atoms remaining in any
dead plant or animal matter can be used to establish the date of death. At first all appeared to be well, but
developments proved otherwise. Dr W F Libby's work should have proved to be an invaluable tool to aid
the study of ancient History and archaeology. It didn't, so what went wrong?
First, the Radio Carbon 14 technique spawned the new study of ancient tree rings in the profession of
dendro-chronology. Trees grow a new ring every year, and in a year when the weather favours growth,
usually by reason of a warm season with plentiful rain, the tree ring grows thick. In a year of drought, and
or cold weather, the tree ring growth is stunted and the annual ring growth is thin.
High up in the cold clear snow bound White Mountains of California in the U.S.A. are the scattered forests
of the lonely Bristle cone Pine Tree, a hardy tree which has an extraordinary life span. Following a
suggestion made by Schulmann, Professor Charles Wesley Ferguson of the Arizona State University set up
a major study of these trees, which can live to be over 5200 years old. By analysing the Radio Carbon 14
present in every individual annual tree ring growth in samples extracted from a living tree, and then by
calculating backwards from the present year of life of the tree, the quantity of decaying Radio Carbon 14
could be established for every year back to the birth of the tree.
There was huge optimism in scientific circles that the constant gradual loss of Radio Carbon 14 on the scale
of 50 % per annum would allow for a reliable chronology to be established for ancient history. With
humans the succeeding generations overlap and share some years of their lives in common, with
grandparents, parents, and children, all alive at the same time. Trees are no different, and some very old
long dead Bristlecone pines were still alive when some of the present living 4000 and 5000 year old trees
were very young. These dead trees are preserved by the extreme cold at high altitude in the California
Mountains. So core samples from the early youth of living trees can be used to match annual tree ring
growth patterns with the later years of older dead trees. This allowed for a pattern to be established, and by
matching these unique annual tree ring growth patterns, Professor Charles Ferguson and able to extend his
ancient Radio Carbon 14 chronological clock back to around 8200 years. The Measurement Table of tree
ring growth and Radio Carbon 14 decline was finally constructed, going back for around 8,200 years.
Similar studies are being undertaken with ancient tree ring growths from samples found preserved in bogs,
or taken from ancient mediaeval cathedrals, and in other archaeological circumstances in Europe and in
many other areas.
Now the desperately needed scientific measuring clock to establish firm and accurate dates for ancient
organic materials was available. The work of Dr W F Libby had been complimented by that of Professor C
W Ferguson, and the hazardous guesswork and comparison estimating forced upon archaeologists and
historians could be abandoned in many areas. Now all materials of an organic nature could be scientifically
tested and accurately dated by their Radio Carbon 14 content, as set against the known quantities from the
carefully counted consecutive samples from the Bristlecone Pine tree rings of accurate date. Up to this
12
point in time the Accused had also been the Judge, the Witness, the Prosecution, the Defence, and the Jury,
in the trial of ancient dates. An item historically estimated to be from 1400 BC in Egypt was tested and the
R.C.14 content was measured. That Radio Carbon 14 figure resulting from the scientific test was then
declared to be the figure to be anticipated for 1400 BC materials. The quantity of Radio Carbon14 in the
item was tested, was then compared against its own result, and "hey presto" a perfect 100 % vindication
emerged. By establishing Radio Carbon 14 values in this way, and by creating a graph of "results" against
calendar years, a perfect straight line could be achieved on a simple graph. Items of 1200 BC obviously
read off as calendar of 1200 BC, and the same applied to every other date, 1000 BC, 1100 BC, 1200 BC,
1300 BC, and so on and on, like a spinning dog chasing its own tail, and remaining on the same spot going
nowhere.
The key to all this was the immense over-confidence of the Egyptologists in the supposed chronological
and factual accuracy of their historical subject. Inevitably the new Tables of Radio Carbon 14 decline and
content, accurately calculated from the carefully counted (and checkable) and known dateable tree ring
samples, were now applied to surviving materials from the ancient world. Inevitably the super-abundance
of items of animal, plant, and other organic forms, which had survived in the dry preservation chamber that
is Egypt, were of central importance.
Given the widespread preservation of good quality timber items in ancient Egypt, resulting from the unique
climatic conditions favouring preservation, Radio Carbon 14 dates back to the dawn of ancient Egyptian
History were available. All was no longer well however, because by the 1970's the Bristlecone Pine
scientific tabular data was producing Radio Carbon 14 figures which were at variance with the 19th century
guessed and speculative historical dates "established" for ancient Egyptian History by between 600 and 800
years. Sanity might demand that the extraordinary feat of applied science stemming from the discovery of
Radio Carbon 14 decline by Dr W F Libby, and the work on the Bristlecone Pine by Professor Ferguson
might have resolved these known problems. Not so, and with typical selectivity of choice of evidence the
scientific method was declared to be inaccurate, by the non-scientific archaeological community.
These results, which were at such great variance with the historical calculations of the Egyptologists,
produced consternation. The new scientific Radio Carbon 14 dates were wildly different to those resulting
from those "calculated" by the Astrological methods of the 19th Century Berlin School of archaeological
mathematical humbug. Dates that emerged from Radio Carbon 14 testing by the 1970's, were 200 years,
400 years, 600 years, 800 years, and even 1000 years, and more, different from what was expected.
Logic demanded that there should be an urgent detailed in-depth study of the ancient Egyptian History and
its chronology, and a very thorough re-examination of the very suspect and slipshod methods by which the
18th & 19th Century astrologers and amateurs had claimed to establish this historical chronology. If the
scientific method of Radio Carbon 14 dating was valid and correct, then ancient Egyptian chronology was
in total disarray – even in chaos. This was and still is the case. The stark and very basic choice facing the
"experts" in Egyptology was that either Chaos continued to reign in the order of events and the chronology
of ancient Egypt, or otherwise there was something very wrong with the obviously scientifically correct
Radio Carbon 14 dating system.
In fact the moment was a heaven sent opportunity to reject the overstated claims of the "great" pioneers of
Egyptian research, and it offered a chance to put the house of ancient history in order for the first time in
well over a thousand years. The problem was all the more formidable as it has been explained, and it is
apparent that with ancient Egyptian dating in total pandemonium, all the other ancient histories of Assyria,