1 CHAPTER - I INDUSTRIAL PROFILE OF MAHARASHTRA INTRODUCTION: In this chapter, an attempt has been made to present the industrial profile of Maharashtra. This chapter contains the industrial development of India in relation to some other select countries, India’s industrial development over the period. Inter State comparison of industrial progress in order to show industrial disparity. It mainly explains the industrial development of Maharashtra giving Division-wise & District-wise status for the purpose of indicating intrastate industrial disparity. This is judged with the help of select indicators of industrial development such as number of factories, number of employees, fixed capital, working capital, industrial consumption of electricity and industrial estates etc. FORMATION OF MAHARASHTRA: Maharashtra state consists of four regions viz; Konkan, Western Maharashtra, Marathawada, and Vidarbha. All these regions were parts of three states, i.e. Bombay Provision, Madhya Pradesh, & Hyderabad State. 1 st November, 1956, they were combined with Saurashtra to form a part of the composite bilingual Mumbai (1) on 1 st May1960, the composite Mumbai state was bifurcated & the present Maharashtra was formed as a single sublingual state of the Indian union. (2) LOCATION OF MAHARASHTRA: Maharashtra is one of the 30 states of the Indian Union. The state is situated between 16.4 0 to 22.1 0 north latitudes and longitude between 72.6 0 to 80.9 0 in the east. The state is about 800 km. east-west and 700 km. north-south. It has a land area of 3.0777 lakh sq. km. and constitutes about 9.36 percent of all India area of 32.873 lakh sq. km. It is the third largest state in India in terms of geographical area. As per 2011 census, Maharashtra is the second largest state in India in case of population as its population is 11.237 crore which is 9.29 percent share of total population of India. The state is bounded by Arabian Sea in the west, Gujarat in the northwest, Madhya Pradesh in the north, Andhra Pradesh in the south east, Karnataka & Goa in the
41
Embed
CHAPTER - I INDUSTRIAL PROFILE OF MAHARASHTRA …shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/74769/8/08_chapter1.pdf · number one in both years & Ethiopia at last number, i.e. 122
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
CHAPTER - I
INDUSTRIAL PROFILE OF MAHARASHTRA
INTRODUCTION:
In this chapter, an attempt has been made to present the industrial profile of
Maharashtra. This chapter contains the industrial development of India in relation to
some other select countries, India’s industrial development over the period. Inter State
comparison of industrial progress in order to show industrial disparity. It mainly explains
the industrial development of Maharashtra giving Division-wise & District-wise status
for the purpose of indicating intrastate industrial disparity. This is judged with the help of
select indicators of industrial development such as number of factories, number of
employees, fixed capital, working capital, industrial consumption of electricity and
industrial estates etc.
FORMATION OF MAHARASHTRA:
Maharashtra state consists of four regions viz; Konkan, Western Maharashtra,
Marathawada, and Vidarbha. All these regions were parts of three states, i.e. Bombay
Provision, Madhya Pradesh, & Hyderabad State. 1st November, 1956, they were
combined with Saurashtra to form a part of the composite bilingual Mumbai (1) on 1st
May1960, the composite Mumbai state was bifurcated & the present Maharashtra was
formed as a single sublingual state of the Indian union. (2)
LOCATION OF MAHARASHTRA:
Maharashtra is one of the 30 states of the Indian Union. The state is situated
between 16.40 to 22.10 north latitudes and longitude between 72.60 to 80.90 in the east.
The state is about 800 km. east-west and 700 km. north-south. It has a land area of
3.0777 lakh sq. km. and constitutes about 9.36 percent of all India area of 32.873 lakh sq.
km. It is the third largest state in India in terms of geographical area.
As per 2011 census, Maharashtra is the second largest state in India in case of
population as its population is 11.237 crore which is 9.29 percent share of total
population of India.
The state is bounded by Arabian Sea in the west, Gujarat in the northwest,
Madhya Pradesh in the north, Andhra Pradesh in the south east, Karnataka & Goa in the
2
South. The Konkan coastal stretches about 720 km. long in the west and the Sahyadri
ranges parallel to the sea coast at about 80 km. wide in the east. It comprises three
natural parts- the narrow coastal low land of Konkan, the sahyadries and Deccan plateau.
The State has 35 districts, divided in to six revenue divisions. They are Konkan,
Pune, Nashik, Aurangabad, Amravati and Nagpur. Mumbai is the state capital and
Nagpur is the seasonal venue of state Legislature. Ahmadnagar is the largest and Greater
Mumbai is the smallest district in the state.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA:
While reading industrial profile of Maharashtra, it is pertinent to study the
industrial development of India. In India, industry is the second biggest source of income
after service sector. India has been striving for industrial development particularly since
independence of the country through different five years plans. During the plan period,
India has been witnessing industrial development by setting up a diversified structure.
Indian union Government & state Governments are making special efforts for industrial
development by adopting several policy measures such as incentive plans formation of
supporting institutions like banks, financial institutions, infrastructure facilities for
provision of in infrastructure facilities etc.
The industrial development of India is to be viewed from the period prior to
independence. From this point of view, the history of industrial development of India is
to consider into two periods as pre-independence period & post independence period.
PRE – INDEPENDENCE PERIOD:
In mid nineteenth century, the economy of India was self – sufficient as small and
cottage industries were meeting the local needs. These industries were satisfying the
primary needs of village people. Then there were no adequate transport facilities
available because of lack of infrastructure facilities, industries were organized in tiny &
small size & they were catering to the local needs only.
There had been British Rule in India for the period of 150 years. During this
period, the British Government remained silent spectator & did not pay need to the
industrial activities in the country. In this period, India was a merely raw material
exporting nation. This resulted in non-development of industrial activities in the country.
Then Government no doubt made some symbolic efforts such as the appointment of the
3
industrial commission in 1916, Fiscal commission in 1921 etc. No plan with any policy
was with the British Government for industrial development of India. The first cotton
textile started in 1854, Jute mill in 1855, coal mining in 1972, Railways in 1854 & Steel
plant 1907.
POST INDEPENDENCE PERIOD:
For economic development, industrialization was recognized & accepted as an
important part of planning in India after independence, for this purpose, industrial
infrastructure was developed in some cities. The first industrial policy of India was
declared in 1948 by the Indian Government. Though first & second five year's plans gave
more importance to agriculture, industrialization process was started from the first year
of the first five year plan, i.e. in 1951. Due to the industrial policy of the union
government, the traditional industries in developing stage got a boost & large number of
entrepreneurs in different industries came forward & started their industrial activities.
This created a very atmosphere for increasing industrial activities in the country. The
industrial policy of 1956 brought a real life to corporate sector in our country & large
scale industries emerged on the horizon of India producing variety of goods.
India has been striving for industrial development since independence by
adopting five year plans, several industrial policies & other measurers. No doubt, India
has much achieved in the field of industry. Still, she remakes 51 among the countries in
the world in terms of industrial development. (3) In the beginning five years plan,
importance was laid on traditional and heavy capital goods industries. In these plans, an
attempt was made to use huge labour force & natural resources available in the country.
Since 1991, an industrialization is being achieved in the light of liberalization,
privatization & globalization as a part of new economic policy. Since 1991, successive
governments have carried forward the reforms of new policy in industrial sector,
financial sector, fiscal sector & external sector. Both the central Government & many
state governments have initiated significant procedural & policy reforms to attract
foreign investment and increase domestic private participation in the development of
industries.
4
Review of Post Independence Industrial Development In India:
India is a developing country. Considering over population of India, industrial
development is the most to provide employment to her people for increasing their
income level & living standard. There has been industrial development in a large extent
in developed countries. Considering the experience of the developed countries, India has
also been making planned attempts for industrial development through successive five
years plan & industrial policies, the latest being the New Economic Policy, 1991.
Table No. 1.1
Important Indicators of Industrial Development in I ndia
Indicator 1960-61 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2008-09
No. of Factories (in thousands)
42.60 96.50 (127)
110.20 (159)
131.30 (208)
155.32 (265)
Employment (in thousands)
3732 7854 (110)
8163 (119)
7918 (112)
11327 (204)
Fixed Capital (Rs. In crores)
NA 29600 133648 (352)
399604 (1236)
1055966 (3467)
Gross Output (Rs. In crores)
4521 61084 (1251)
270564 (5885)
926902 (20402)
2661486 (57869)
Value Added (Rs. In crores)
1138 11929 (948)
51515 (4427)
143621 (12520)
592114 (51031)
Sources: 1. Industrial Maharashtra, The land of opportunities, Maharashtra Economic Development council, Monthly Economic Digest, June 1993, Mumbai (for 1960-61).
2. Statistical outline of India 2006-07, Taka services limited, Department of Economics & statistics for 1980-81, 1990-91 & 2000-01. 3. Annual survey of Industry for 2008-09. Note: 1. Figures in brackets indicate growth rate. 2. 1960-61 has been assumed as based year except for fixed capital for which 1980-81 taken as base year.
Table 1.1 shows various indicators of industrial development in India for various
periods from 1960-61 to 2008-09 at different point of time.
In terms of number of factories, there was a growth by 265 percent over the
period from 1960-61 to 2008-09. Employment showed a growth by 204 percent fixed
capital by 3467 percent, gross output by 57869 percent and value added by 51031
percent over the period. The growth in factories & employment was not satisfactory and
not in tune with the remaining indicators, but growth in fixed capital was good. Growth
in gross output & value added was tremendous.
5
India’s position vis-à-vis various leading countries in terms of industrial
development. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT:
Table No. 1.2
CIP Index Value of Various Leading Countries for 2000 & 2005 (in Numbers and
Index)
Rank Country or Territory CIP Index Value 2005 2000 2005 2000
1 1 Singapore 0.890 0.887 2 2 Ireland 0.689 0.778 3 3 Japan 0.678 694 4 4 Switzerland 0.659 0.653 5 5 Sweden 0.603 0.593 6 6 Germany 0.602 0.586 7 7 Finland 0.594 0.584 8 8 Belgum 0.583 0.561 9 12 Republic of Korea 0.575 0.528 10 10 Taiwan Province of China 0.555 0.552 52 45 Argentina 0.256 0.266 53 42 Austrelia 0.255 0.281 54 51 India 0.252 0.254 55 55 Mauritius 0.246 0.247 56 57 Georgia 0.245 0.245 120 118 Algeria 0.063 0.083 121 121 Gabon 0.052 0.045 122 122 Ethiopia 0.035 0.044
Source: United Nations Industrial Development Report 2008-09.
Table 1.2 indicates CIP index value of various leading countries for 2000 & 2005
from the table, it is seen that India ranked 51 in 2000 & 54 in 2005. Singapore was at
number one in both years & Ethiopia at last number, i.e. 122 in both years.
It can be concluded that India is improving her position in the world in case of
industrial development as she went up to 54 ranks in 2005 from 51 ranks in 2000 as
shown in table 1.2.
6
Table No. 1.3
Share percentage of Selected Countries inGDP from Industry
(As on 31st March, 2009)
Sr. No.
Country or Territory Percentage Share of GDP from
Industry 1 Singapore 35 2 United Kingdom 24 3 Japan 30 4 USA 23 5 Autreliya 28 6 Germany 30 7 China 48 8 Shri Lanka 27 9 India 29 10 Bangladesh 28
Source: United Nations Industrial Development Report 2008-09 & International
Statistics from TATA Services Ltd.Mumbai.
Table 1.3 and Graph 1.1 Shows share percentage of select countries in GDP from
industry. Singapore was at the top as she had 35 percent share in GDP from industry &
USA at the lowest, In this regard. India had 29 percent share in GDP from industry.
Among the select countries, India had got fairly high position in this regard.
35
24
30
23
2830
48
2729 28
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Sh
are
of
GD
P f
rom
In
du
stry
Country
Graph 1.1
Percentage Share of GDP from Industry
7
INDUSTRIAL PROFILE OF MAHARASHTRA:
Maharashtra is considered as one of the industrial developed states in India.
Maharashtra’s consistent contribution of more than 20% in net value added in the
organized industries sector in the country reflects its high position in industrialization.(4)
Annual survey of industries 1988-89 regarded that Maharashtra continued to be
in the lead in terms of industrial development.(5) The annual survey of industries 2003-04
showed that in the organized industrial sector in the country, Maharashtra contributed
18.5% in gross value of output, 20.65% in net value added, 13.53% in number of
factories, and 12.72% in number of workers employed, 17.6% in fixed capital & 17.2 %
in productive capital.
In 2005-06, the state was at the top by holding 20.1% of the total industrial
investment in the country & it had also got 20% of all foreign investment in the country.
In 2006-07, the state contributed one fifth of the manufacturing GSDP of the all
states of India. According to Annual survey of Industries 2010-11, it is revealed that
amongst the states in India, Maharashtra was at the top position in terms of gross value
added and employments paid to employees with share of 20.5% and 16.4% at all India
level. In case of number of factories, fixed capital and employment, the state was at the
second position in the country with a share of 13.2%, 14.5% & 12.1 % respectively.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN MAHARASHTRA SINCE ITS
FORMATION:
Since the formation of Maharashtra state the Government of Maharashtra has
been making deliberate & planned efforts for industrial development by taking several
steps such as setting up several supporting institutions and adopting different package
schemes of incentives. The general atmosphere in the state is also helping for industrial
development. At the formation of the state, there was a great in the regional industrial
disparity. In order to remove, inter regional disparity, the state Government framed its
industrial policy supporting industrial dispersal and decentralization all over the state
because of such planned & deliberate steps taken, the state has made a spectacular
progress in the filed of industry.
8
An attempt is made to throw light on the industrial development of Maharashtra
with the help of five different indicators for the period from 1960-61 to 2003-04 at
different points of time as shown in table 1.4.
Table No.1.4
Industrial Development in Maharashtra-Number of Workers, Number of
Registered Factories, Fixed Capital Investment, Value Added & Consumption of
Electricity
(From 1960-61 to 2009-10)
Indicator 1960-61 1993-94 2003-04
No. of Workers (No.) 369623 983455 (166) 1051909(185)
No. of working registered
factories (No) 1228 26663(2071) 29637(2313)
Fixed Capital (Rs. In Crores) 95.15 64586(67777) 83472(87626)
Value Added (Rs. In crores) 112 34762(30995) 41910(37390)
Consumption of electricity for industrial use (in KWh crores.
214 1436(571) 20900(877)
Source: The figures have been compiled from statistical abstract of Maharashtra state
1960-61, district socio-Economic Review 1993-94 and 2003-04 and office
record of the directorate of economics & statistics, Govt. of Mahrarashtra,
Mumbai.
Note: 1) Figures in the brackets indicate growth rate.
2) 1960-61 has been assumed as base year.
9
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
No. of Workers
(No.)
No.of working
registered
factories (No)
Fixed Capital
(Rs. In Crores)
Value Added
(Rs. In crores)
Consumption of
electricity for
industrial use
(in KWh crores.
Nu
mb
er
oin
C
rore
s, K
WH
& N
o.
Indicators
Graph 1.2.1
Industrial Development in Maharashtra
1960-61
1993-94
2003-04
369623
9834551051909
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1960-61 1993-94 2003-04
Nu
mb
er
of
Wo
rke
rs(N
o.)
Year
Graph 1.2.2
No. of Workers
10
1228
26663
29637
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
1960-61 1993-94 2003-04
Ww
ork
ing
re
gis
tere
d f
acto
rie
s (N
o)
Year
Graph 1.2.3
No.of working Registered Factories
95.15
64586
83472
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
1960-61 1993-94 2003-04
Fix
ed
Ca
pit
al in
Rs.
(In
Cro
res)
Year
Graph 1.2.4
Fixed Capital (Rs. In Crores)
11
It is revealed from the analysis of data as shown in table 1.4 & graph 1.2.1, 1.2.2,
1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5 & graph 1.2.6 regarding select indicators of industrial development of
Maharashtra for the period from 1960-61 to 2003-04 at three different points of time that
there was a growth in case of each indicator. The number of workers went up by near
about 2 times, number of factories by 23 times, fixed capital by 876 times, value added
by 374 times and consumption of electricity for industrial use by 9 times over the period.
All the indicators except number of workers showed impressive growth.
112
34762
41910
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1960-61 1993-94 2003-04
Va
lue
Ad
de
d (
Rs.
In
cro
res)
Year
Graph 1.2.5
Value Added (Rs. In crores)
2141436
20900
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
1960-61 1993-94 2003-04
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n o
f e
lectr
icit
y f
or
ind
ust
ria
l
use
(in
KW
h c
rore
s)
Year
Graph 1.2.6
Consumption of Electricity for Industrial use
12
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF MAHARASHTRA VIS-À-VIS
INDIA:
An attempt has been made to make comparison of industrial development of
Maharashtra with India with the help of some indicators in table1.5.
Table No. 1.5
Industrial Development of Maharashtra vis-à-vis India (2009-10)
(Rs. In Crore)
Sr. No. Indicator Maharashtra India
1 No. of Industries 19457(12.25) 158877
2 Fixed Capital 197274(14.59) 1352184
3 Working Capital 63467(16.37) 387745
4 Total output 624049(16.72) 3733036
5 Total Input 489066(16.12) 3035853
6 Gross Value Added 134983(19.36) 697183
7 Net value Added 117872(19.91) 592114
8 Employment (No) 10.63(11.6) 91.58
9 Profit 68549(20.59) 332931
Source: Central Statistical organization, Govt. of India.
Note: Figures in brackets indicate Maharashtra’s percentage to India (total).
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
Am
ou
nt
in R
s.
Indicators
Graph 1.3.1
Industrial Development of Maharashtra vis-à-vis India
Nagpur Region 90989 7.47% 116825 7.83% Grand Total 1217260 100.00% 1491952 100.00%
Mean 40575 43881 S.D. 61514 76710 C.V. 151.61 174.81
Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASI Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note : 1. Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total. 2. N.A. indicates Not Available.
30
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
Gre
ate
r M
um
ba
i
Th
an
e
Ra
iga
d
Ra
tna
gir
i
Sin
dh
ud
urg
Ko
nka
n R
eg
ion
Pu
ne
Sa
tara
Sa
ng
ali
So
lap
ur
Ko
lha
pu
r
Pu
ne
Re
gio
n
Na
sik
Dh
ule
Na
nd
urb
ar
Jalg
ao
n
Ah
ma
dn
ag
ar
Na
sik R
eg
ion
Au
ran
ga
ba
d
Jaln
a
Pa
rbh
an
i
Hin
go
li
Be
ed
Na
nd
ed
Osm
an
ab
ad
La
tur
Au
ran
ga
ba
d R
eg
ion
Bu
ldh
an
a
Ako
la
Wa
shim
Am
rava
ti
Ya
wa
tma
l
Am
rava
ti R
eg
ion
Wa
rdh
a
Na
gp
ur
Bh
an
da
ra
Go
nd
ia
Ch
an
dra
pu
r
Ga
dch
iro
li
Na
gp
ur
Re
gio
n
No
. o
f W
orke
rs
District & Division
Graph 1.8
Total of No. of Employment in Factories in Maharashtra (in numbers)
No. of Employment 1999-2000 No. of Employment 2008-09
31
Table 1.11 & Graph 1.8 of employment in factories in the state is one of the
factors selected for making relative study of industrial development within district
division in Maharashtra. Table 1.11 shows the all the districts and divisions in respect of
total number of employment in factories in Maharashtra.
In 1999-2000, Thane district topped in the state with 20% share in total number
of employment in factories, followed by greater Mumbai 16.63%, Pune 16.63% least
share held by Gadchiroli district 0.08%, followed by Osmanabad district 0.34% share.
In the case of divisions it is observed that Konkan division was topped with
41.85% share in total number of employment, followed by Pune division 27.55% share,
Nashik 12.52% share least share was held by Amrawati division non with 3.06% share,
followed by Nagpur division 7.47% share.In 2008-09, Pune district topped in
Maharashtra by having 20.09% share in total number of employment in factories,
followed by Thane district 18.08% share, greater Mumbai 16.47% share.
As far as divisions on concerned, Konkan division was again at top by having
40.43% share in total number of employment in Maharashtra, followed by Pune division
7.83% share, least share was held in Amrawati division i.e. 2.26% share.
Industrial policy of Maharashtra having positive effect in industrial dispersal was
gradually declines. The share of most industry developed districts was declined Pune
20%, in 1999-2000 to 18.08 in 2008-09% in 2008-09. Greater Mumbai 16.63% in 1999-
2000 to 16.47% in 2008-09.
Table No. 1.12 Working Factories in Maharashtra
District/ Division No. of Working Factories ('000')
1999-2000 Percentage to total 2008-09 Percentage to
Nagpur Region 47 19.58% 47 17.74% Grand Total 240 100.00% 265 100.00%
Mean 13 15 S.D. 12 14 C.V. 91.87 93.47
Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASI Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note : Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.
Table 1.13 & Graph 1.10 shows the number of industrial estate in Maharashtra is
one of important indicator to study the industrial development in Maharashtra. Table
1.13 shows the share of all district & division in respect of number of industrial estate in
Maharashtra.
In 1999-2000, Pune district having 15.83% share, scored at the top Amravati
district scored the second having 5.83% share in number of industrial estate followed by
Thane, Nagput and Bhandara district 5% share, Ratnagiri 4.58% share. The lowest
0.83% share was held by Greater Mumbai district, followed by Osmanabad district
1.67% share.
In the case of divisions, it is seen that Nagpur division topped in the state by
securing 19.58% share followed by Pune division 18.33% share. The division securing
lowest share in this regard was Nasik division which scored 12.08% share followed by
Aurangabad and Amravati division 17.08% share.
36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60G
rea
ter
Mu
mb
ai
Th
an
e
Ra
iga
d
Ra
tna
gir
i
Sin
dh
ud
urg
Ko
nka
n R
eg
ion
Pu
ne
Sa
tara
Sa
ng
ali
So
lap
ur
Ko
lha
pu
r
Pu
ne
Re
gio
n
Na
sik
Dh
ule
Jalg
ao
n
Ah
ma
dn
ag
ar
Na
sik R
eg
ion
Au
ran
ga
ba
d
Jaln
a
Pa
rbh
an
i
Be
ed
Na
nd
ed
Osm
an
ab
ad
La
tur
Au
ran
ga
ba
d R
eg
ion
Bu
ldh
an
a
Ako
la
Am
rava
ti
Ya
wa
tma
l
Am
rava
ti R
eg
ion
Wa
rdh
a
Na
gp
ur
Bh
an
da
ra
Ch
an
dra
pu
r
Ga
dch
iro
li
Na
gp
ur
Re
gio
n
No
. o
f In
du
stri
al E
sta
te (
in '0
00
')
District & Division
Graph 1.10
No. of Industrial Estate in Factories Sector in Maharashtra (in '000')
No. of Industrialist 1999-2000 No. of Industrialist 2008-2009
37
Table No. 1.14 Share of All District in Respect of Industrial consumption of Electricity in Factories
in Maharashtra (In KWH) Capita industrial Consumpt ion of Electricity District/ Division
Capita industrial Consumption of Electricity 1999-2000 % to total 2008-09 % to total
Source: Unit level data purchased from ministry of statistic & programme implementation regarding ASI and District level social economic survey published by directorate of economics and statistics Government of Maharashtra various issues, Data of Maharashtra for the year 1999-2000 & 2008-2009. Note : Figures in the brackets indicate percentage to total.
38
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Gre
ate
r M
um
ba
i
Th
an
e
Ra
iga
d
Ra
tna
gir
i
Sin
dh
ud
urg
Ko
nka
n R
eg
ion
Pu
ne
Sa
tara
Sa
ng
ali
So
lap
ur
Ko
lha
pu
r
Pu
ne
Re
gio
n
Na
sik
Na
nd
urb
ar
Dh
ule
Jalg
ao
n
Ah
ma
dn
ag
ar
Na
sik R
eg
ion
Au
ran
ga
ba
d
Jaln
a
Pa
rbh
an
i
Hin
go
li
Be
ed
Na
nd
ed
Osm
an
ab
ad
La
tur
Au
ran
ga
ba
d R
eg
ion
Bu
ldh
an
a
Ako
la
Wa
shim
Am
rava
ti
Ya
wa
tma
l
Am
rava
ti R
eg
ion
Wa
rdh
a
Na
gp
ur
Bh
an
da
ra
Go
nd
ia
Ch
an
dra
pu
r
Ga
dch
iro
li
Na
gp
ur
Re
gio
n
Ca
pit
a i
nd
ust
ria
l C
on
sum
pti
on
of
Ele
ctr
icit
y in
KW
H
District & Division
Graph 1.11
Share of All District in Respect of Industrial Consumption of Electricity in Factories in
Maharashtra
Capita industrial Consumption of Electricity 1999-2000 Capita industrial Consumption of Electricity 2008-09
39
In 2008-09, Pune district scored highest 16.60% share in number of industrial
estate in Maharashtra followed by Amravati district 5.66% share, Sangali 4.91% share.
The lowest share was held by Greater Mumbai district 1.13% share, followed by
Sindhudurga 1.25% share.
In the case of divisions, it is observed that Aurangabad division was at top by
having 19.25% share, followed by Pune 18.49%, Nagpur division 17.74%. The lowest
share was held in Nashik division by region 11.32% share
Table 1.14 & Graph 1.11 shows consumption of Electricity in factories in
Maharashtra is one of important indicating to study the industrial development in
Maharashtra. Table 1.14 shows the share of all district & division in respect of per capita
industrial consumption of Electricity in factories in Maharashtra.
In 1999-2000, Raigad district scored the top having 16.74% share in per capita
E.C. followed Thane district 9.21% share, Pune 6.80% share. The lowest 0.35% share
was held by Parbhani district, followed by Beed district 0.40% share.
In the case of divisions, it is seen that Konkan division topped in the state by securing
36.32% share followed by Pune division 16.61% share. The division securing lowest
share in this regard was Amrawati division which scored 3.17% share followed by
Nashik division 8.72%.
In 2008-09, Raigad district scored highest 19.8% share in per capita E.C.
followed by Pune district 8.61% share, Wardha 8.15% share. The lowest share was held
by Washim district 0.28% share, followed Hingoli 0.30% share.
In the case of divisions, it is observed that Konkan division was again at top by
having 31.8% share, followed by Nandurbar 23.45%, Pune division 18.08%. The lowest
share was held in Amrawati division by region 3.41% share.
On the basis of above discussion a few observation are summarized as under:-
1. Maharashtra state is prominent in industrial development of country.
2. CIP index value of various leading countries for 2000 and 2005 showed that
industrial development of India went up to 54 ranks in 2005, from 51 rank in
2000.
3. It noticed that indicator showed that impressive industrial development in
Maharashtra since inception the number of worked went by near about 2 times,
number of factories by 23 times , fixed capital by 876 times , value added by 374
times and consumption of electricity for industrial use by 9 times over the period.
40
4. It is noticed that Maharashtra’s share in industrial development in India showed
that 12.25 share in number of industries , 14.59% in fixed capital 16.37% in
working capital, 16.72% in total output and 19.91% in net value added and last
20.59% in profit.
5. It observed that grater Mumbai thane and konkan region toped in the state
securing 39.91% of workers in factories followed by Pune division with share
28.26%
6. It also observed that fixed capital invested in a factories in Maharashtra showed
that higher districts and industrial disparity is the state the C.V. which slided
down from 181.83 % in 1999-00 to 178.66% in 2008-09.
7. It is revealed that working capital invested in factories in Maharashtra as we
know Konkan division ranked on first position with the share 47.83% , followed
by Pune division 21.31% share and lowest share held by Amravati division
1.95%
8. It noticed that in 2008-09, Pune district toped in Maharashtra by having 20.09%
share in total number of employment in factories, followed by Thane district
18.08% share, grater Mumbai 16.47%.
9. It is observed that in 2008-09 grater Mumbai district was at top by having
24.13% shares in number of factories, second position share was held by Thane
district 17.12% share followed by Pune district 12.68% share. The least position
secured by Gadchiroli district with 0.11% share in number of working factories.
It is also seen that the industrial disparity has increasing interstate the C.V. in
1999-2000 was 115.37% which was increased to 179.39% in 2008-09.
10. It revealed from above that, in 2008-09 the consumption of electricity in factories
in Maharashtra, Raigad district scored highest 19.80% share in consumption of
electricity for industries followed by Pune district 8.61% share, Wardha district
8.15% share. The lowest share was held by Washim district 0.28% share.
The kokan division was again at top having 31.80 % share followed by Nagpur
division 23.45% share and the lowest share was held in Amravati division by
3.41% share.
41
References
1. The State Reorganization Act, 1956
2. The Mumbai State Reorganization Act, 1960
3. United Nations Industrial Development Report, 2008-09
4. Economic Survey of Maharashtra 2004-05 P. 178
5. V.S. Kaveri Industrial & Banking Development in Maharashtra, an article in the
book – ‘Regional Economic Development in India, edited by Susheela subrahmanya
and M.V. Shrinivasa Gowda (1995), P.464
6. Annual Survey Of Industries 2003-04, http://mospi.nic.in /asi-table3-2003-04, P. 1