CHAPTER FOUR Organizational Architecture. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 4-2 Outline of Chapter 4 Organizational.

CHAPTER FOUROrganizational Architecture

4-2

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Outline of Chapter 4Organizational Architecture

Basic Building Blocks Organizational Architecture Accounting’s Role in the Organization’s

Architecture Example of Accounting’s Role: Executive

Compensation Contracts

4-3

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Self-interested BehaviorFundamental assumption of economics: Individuals

act in their own self-interest to maximize utility.

Opportunity set:

work for employer, work on other projects, relax, etc.

Resource constraints:

time, money, knowledge, etc.

Utility:

preferences for money, working conditions, leisure, etc.

4-4

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Team ProductionIndividuals form teams or firms because: can produce more in a team than they can acting alone generate a larger opportunity set

Firm is defined as a nexus of contracts among resource owners who voluntarily contract with individual team members to benefit both the firm and the individuals.

Firms in an economic sense include for-profit corporations, divisions within a corporation, not-for-profit organizations, and other entities.

4-5

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Firm as a Nexus of ContractsFrom Brickley, Smith, and Zimmerman, Organizational Architecture,

Second Edition, (Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2001), pp. 131-132.

The firm is a legal entity that can contract with many parties and enforce these contracts in courts of law.

labor contracts: employee, union, independent contractors supply contracts: inventory, materials, utilities customer contracts: sales, warranties finance contracts: insurance, leases, franchises, debt, stock

Some contracts are explicit written documents and others are implicit oral agreements supported by the reputation of the parties.

4-6

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Principal-Agent ModelPrincipal-agent model Economic model of relationships in a firm Principals are managers or firm owners Agents are employees or independent contractors Agents perform functions for principals Numerous principal-agent relationships exist in firms

Agency costs Reductions in firm value caused when agents pursue their own

interests to the detriment of the principal (goals are incongruent)

A major use of internal accounting systems is to control agency costs

4-7

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Agency ProblemsFree-rider problem: Agents have incentives to shirk because their

individual efforts are not directly observable.

Solutions: Incentive contracts, monitoring, etc.

Horizon problem: Agents expecting to leave firm in near future place less weight on long-term consequences.

Solutions: Incentive contracts, monitoring, etc.

Employee theft: Employees take firm resources for unauthorized purposes.

Solutions: Buy fidelity bond, monitoring, inventory control, etc.

Empire-building: Managers seek to manage larger number of agents to increase their own job security or compensation.

Solutions: Modify incentive contracts, benchmarking, etc.

4-8

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Agency Asymmetry ProblemsAdverse selection: Prior to contracting, agents have better

private information than principals.

Solutions: pre-contract investigation, post-contract penalties.

Moral hazard: After contracting, agents have an incentive to deviate because the principal cannot readily observe deviations (hidden action or hidden information).

Solutions: inspecting, monitoring.

4-9

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Decision RightsDecision rights are restrictions on how economic assets of a firm

can or cannot be used.

Management determines how decision rights are to be allocated among various agents within a firm.

Alternative styles of allocating decision rights: Centralize (“micro-management”) Decentralize (employee empowerment)

4-10

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Role of KnowledgeSome knowledge useful for decision making is costly to acquire, store,

and process.

Linking knowledge and decision rights is a key issue for organizational architecture.

Example where knowledge and decision rights are linked:

Machine operator schedules own machine.

Example where knowledge and decision rights are not linked:

Sales representatives know customer’s demand curve best, but only sales manager may approve sales price changes. Giving pricing decision rights to representatives could result in customer kickbacks.

4-11

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Markets versus FirmsFirms can obtain goods and services by either: making within the firm, or buying from outside markets (outsource).

Factors to consider in make-versus-buy: Efficiency and effectiveness Cost of acquiring knowledge Contracting costs Monitoring costs

4-12

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Influence CostsProblem: Agents spend time and other resources trying to

influence decision makers.

Solution: Limit active decision making by imposing bureaucratic rules.

Example: Airlines allocate routes to flight attendants based on senioritythere is no supervisor deciding who gets which route.

4-13

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Organizational Architecture Organizational architecture depends on three legs:(1) Measure performance(2) Reward and punish performance(3) Partition decision rights

In external markets these functions are served by market prices, supply and demand, and the law of contracts.

For transactions inside the firm, management must implement administrative devices to accomplish these functions.

All three legs must be balanced and coordinated.

4-14

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Measure PerformanceTypes of performance measures Objective criteria: production rate, sales, meeting budgets and

schedules Subjective criteria: helping others, innovation, improving team

spirit, etc. Financial measures: profits, costs, revenues, inventory level,

etc. Nonfinancial measures: quality, defects, customer satisfaction,

employee turnover, etc.

Design issues Determining relative weight for each measure. Costs to collect and analyze measures. Internal accounting system provides some of these measures.

4-15

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Reward and Punish PerformanceTypes Pecuniary rewards: salary, bonuses, retirement benefits,

etc. Nonpecuniary rewards: prestigious job titles, better office

location and furnishings, reserved parking places, country club memberships, etc.

Punishments: reprimands, ridicule, demotion, termination, etc.

Design Issues Linked to performance measures External job market Employment and tax law

4-16

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Partition Decision Rights Types Centralize decision rights with top executives Decentralize decision rights to lower levels

Design issues Board of Directors has ultimate authority Linking knowledge and decision rights

See Self-Study Problem, “Span of Control.”

4-17

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Separation of Management and Control

Steps in the decision process

1. Initiation (management)

2. Ratification (control)

3. Implementation (management)

4. Monitoring (control)

Separation of management and control Separation is particularly important for actions with large

impacts across many agents, such as employee hiring, plant construction, etc.

Hierarchical structure of organizations allocates the decision rights over these four steps to different managers or agents.

4-18

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Example: Building a New Plant 1. Initiation: Division managers with specialized knowledge

of production process and customers initiate construction proposal.

2. Ratification: Proposal is analyzed by specialists in finance, marketing, human resources, real estate, and other areas. Senior management uses all this information to decide whether to accept, reject or modify proposal.

3. Implementation: Employees and outside agents construct facilities.

4. Monitoring: Internal accountants prepare financial reports on project.

4-19

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Accounting’s Role in the Organization’s Architecture

Accounting reports are more useful for control (ratifying and monitoring) than for decision management (initiation and implementation). [Recall Chapter 4.]

Decision management requires forward-looking opportunity costs, but accounting data is primarily backward-looking historical results. [Recall Chapter 2.]

Accounting also reduces some agency costs such as employee theft and shirking. [Recall Chapter 4.]

4-20

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Accounting Measures of Performance

Effective control systems require that accounting and audit functions are independent of the people being monitored

Accounting data may aggregate so many individual transactions that they are not useful for decision making.

But aggregate accounting data are useful for control by averaging out random fluctuations.

4-21

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Nonaccounting Measures of Performance

Useful information for decision making, such as product quality, customer demand, machine performance, etc.

Nonaccounting measures are often custom-designed for each individual or team.

4-22

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Accounting and Economic Darwinism

Economic Darwinism implies that seemingly irrational accounting procedures survive when the benefits of these procedures exceed agency costs.

Examples: Average historical costs achieved by a department are useful

for control, even though may not be useful for decision making Depreciation and other indirect costs are allocated to

production departments to make them use firm-wide resources more efficiently

4-23

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Executive Compensation ContractsAgency Problem: Align interests of shareholders (principals) and top

executives (agents).

(1) Measure performance: Board of Directors’ compensation committee sets performance goals based on financial and nonfinancial measures.

(2) Reward and punish performance: Compensation consists of base salary and bonuses. Bonus plans may have lower and upper limits.

(3) Partition decision rights: Directors initiate contracts. Shareholders ratify contracts. Accountants monitor performance.