CHAPTER FOUR 4.1 Introduction: As outlined in the chapter three of Research Methodology the scopes and the objectives of the present study have been identified keeping in mind the l earners’ group i.e. two hundred forty Hindi speakers pursuing English program in various colleges of Delhi University. Out of these 240, 50% are male and 50% are female and t hey are further sub-grouped according to their length of learning as well as disciplines (i.e. Science, Commerce, Arts and English Honors). The learning situation is formal education and materials used are as prescribed by DU. The goals and objectives are as outlined in research methodology. The hypothesis that being examined in this study are mentioned in chapter three page …. They are reiterated for ready reference: Is there a co- relation between learners’ linguistic competence and the structure of the current English program operating in various colleges of DU? Do the current running various components of English program contribute to improving learners’ competence?Is there a progress in terms of students’ linguistic competenc e level from (I) B.A. -I to B.A.III (ii) B.Com. I to B.Com. III (iii) B Sc. I to B Sc. III. (iv) B. Eng.(Hon.)-I to B. Eng.(Hon.) -III What are the variables that interfere and influence in the learning process of the present English program? What are the nature, types and f requencie s of word order errors produced by these major groups of learners in theirthree years of UG program? What are the nature, types and frequencies of English word order errors produced by male and female learners in all these groups (i.e. B.A. /B.Com/B.Sc. /B.Eng. Hons.)? Are the errors patterns of the word order correlated with variables in the study? Are the errors patterns of English word order attributable to TL structure? Are the error patterns of English word order attributable to MT structure? In order to meet these objectives the study conducted was mostly empirical i.e. collecting data through different sets ofquestionnaires (See appendix). The study is composed of four main components: Free Composition Test Language Aptitude Test Attitude Test ( For teachers as well as learners) Learners’ QuestionnairesThe first component is an assessment oflearners’ competence while they compose in English to serve the purpose of: Selecting the subjects Analyzing the word order errors in learners’ English It is hoped that such analysis would help better understand the nature and difficulties these learners face and the error they produce while they compo se in English. The a nalysis of this test w ill be conducte d in both the modes i.e. Subje ctive and Objective modes. The second component is Language Aptitude Test which aims to find out the learners’ competence in English word order ofgrammatical categor ies. Data of this componen t is obtained from the scores produced by the subject in LAT. It would serve the purpose to elicit information about the learners’ competence in English word order of various grammatical catego ries. The third component is concerned with teachers as well as learners’ attitude. They are provided with questionnaires and their attitudes are rated on five point Likert’s scale. In case of teachers, the test is administered to 30 teachers who are teaching English at various colleges of DU. The aim of the test is to find out about pedagogica l attitudes of the teachers and how much attention the program pay s to the learners in question. In case of the learners, the aim is to find out their attitude towards the learning of English word order of various grammatical categorie s. This test is administered to all the learners in question. The fourth component explicitly describes about learners’ bio -data, various modes of learning, hours consumed during learning, English learning oriented activities, lan guage other than Hindi known to the learners, income of the learners’ parents, various kinds of learning a ids etc. The p urpose of this quest ionnaire is to elic it information w hich will w ork out as factors (variables) affecting the learners in question. 4.2 Analysis of Learners’ CompositionTable 1below reveals some of the fundamental clues about the learners’ compositions which are statistically presented here to reflect an explicit image over the s alient features of the writings of these Hindi speaking learners of English as a second language. Table 1 (a) & (b)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
As outlined in the chapter three of Research Methodology the scopes and the objectives of the present study have been
identified keeping in mind the learners’ group i.e. two hundred forty Hindi speakers pursuing English program in various
colleges of Delhi University. Out of these 240, 50% are male and 50% are female and they are further sub-grouped
according to their length of learning as well as disciplines (i.e. Science, Commerce, Arts and English Honors).
The learning situation is formal education and materials used are as prescribed by DU. The goals and objectives are as
outlined in research methodology. The hypothesis that being examined in this study are mentioned in chapter three page
…. They are reiterated for ready reference:
Is there a co-relation between learners’ linguistic competence and the structure of the current English program
operating in various colleges of DU?
Do the current running various components of English program contribute to improving lear ners’ competence?
Is there a progress in terms of students’ linguistic competence level from (I) B.A.-I to B.A.III (ii) B.Com. I to B.Com.
III (iii) B Sc. I to B Sc. III. (iv) B. Eng.(Hon.)-I to B. Eng.(Hon.) -III
What are the variables that interfere and influence in the learning process of the present English program?
What are the nature, types and frequencies of word order errors produced by these major groups of learners in their
three years of UG program? What are the nature, types and frequencies of English word order errors produced by male and female learners in
all these groups (i.e. B.A. /B.Com/B.Sc. /B.Eng. Hons.)?
Are the errors patterns of the word order correlated with variables in the study?
Are the errors patterns of English word order attributable to TL structure?
Are the error patterns of English word order attributable to MT structure?
In order to meet these objectives the study conducted was mostly empirical i.e. collecting data through different sets of questionnaires (See appendix).The study is composed of four main components:
Free Composition Test
Language Aptitude Test
Attitude Test ( For teachers as well as learners)
Learners’ Questionnaires The first component is an assessment of learners’ competence while they compose in English to serve the purpose of:
Selecting the subjects
Analyzing the word order errors in learners’ English It is hoped that such analysis would help better understand the nature and difficulties these learners face and the error they
produce while they compose in English. The analysis of this test will be conducted in both the modes i.e. Subjective and
Objective modes.The second component is Language Aptitude Test which aims to find out the learners’ competence in English word order of
grammatical categories. Data of this component is obtained from the scores produced by the subject in LAT. It would servethe purpose to elicit information about the learners’ competence in English word order of various grammatical categories. The third component is concerned with teachers as well as learners’ attitude. They are provided with questionnaires andtheir attitudes are rated on five point Likert’s scale. In case of teachers, the test is administered to 30 teachers who are
teaching English at various colleges of DU. The aim of the test is to find out about pedagogical attitudes of the teachers andhow much attention the program pays to the learners in question. In case of the learners, the aim is to find out their attitudetowards the learning of English word order of various grammatical categories. This test is administered to all the learners inquestion.The fourth component explicitly describes about learners’ bio-data, various modes of learning, hours consumed during
learning, English learning oriented activities, language other than Hindi known to the learners, income of the learners’ parents, various kinds of learning aids etc. The purpose of this questionnaire is to elicit information which will work out asfactors (variables) affecting the learners in question.
4.2 Analysis of Learners’ Composition Table 1below reveals some of the fundamental clues about the learners’ compositions which are statistically presented hereto reflect an explicit image over the salient features of the writings of these Hindi speaking learners of English as a secondlanguage.
Total No. of word order Errors 22 8 5 15 10 9 19 11 9 6 8 4
Errors with ref. to total no. of words 0.54 0.21 0.13 0.42 0.27 0.23 0.66 0.42 0.22 0.15 0.18 0.1
Total No. of B.W. Order sents. 185 188 239 190 195 240 197 128 177 281 247 257
Total No. of F.W. Order sents. 51 31 18 17 16 23 23 29 28 22 22 24
% of errors with reference to sentences 9.32 3.65 1.94 7.2 4.6 3.42 8.63 7 4.39 1.98 2.97 1.42
Table (a) & (b) above presents some fundamental characteristics obtained from the learners compositions and are presented here to g ive an
image about the salient features of the compositions of these Hindi speaking learners of English as a second language.
Since the main focus of the present study is on the composition (writing) skills of the Hindi speaking learners of English, so it would be
necessary to reflect light on some key concepts that would help to understand the nature of difficulties faced by these learners in question.
The first point would be the average length of the compositions written by four major groups of male learners and twelve subg roups of male
learners which are 332.8, 404.5, 295.9, 349.8, 297.1, 378.3, 204.3, 343.5, 390.4, 204.3, 360.8, 383.5 words and the average length of the
compositions produced by the females learners are 402, 371.9, 364.3, 354, 361.8, 376.6, 285.8, 258.8, 407.3, 376.3, 427.2, 385.5 words respectively.
The female learners, as expected, produced some relatively longer essays in comparison with those produced by the male learners. That is to say, the
female groups seem to have a better repertoire and so able to express themselves more easily.
It is also noticed that B. Com., B. A. and B. A. (Hon.) learners have produced longer compositions as they proceed from the first year to the second year and
from the second year to the third year irrespective to the gender. So we can say that learning and teaching materials and methodologies at some extend
are definitely affecting them. It is also interesting to note through the following table that the English (Hon.) learners are producing the longest
compositions among all the groups of the learners so we can assume that these learners seem to have a better competence in English writing skills.
In case of total no. of sentences no group has performed any significant progress but one can find through the aforementioned table and figure that the
female learners have produced more number of sentences in comparison with the male learners except B.Sc.-II and B.A.(P)-II. However male and female
learners have produced almost equal number of sentences. One can say that the writing skill of the subjects in question has gone down as they move fromthe first year to the second year, from the second year to the third year respectively.
Mean wodrs/sentences
Table 5
Figure 4
Through the aforementioned table and figure one can find that the female learners are composing longer sentences in comparison with the male learners
except B.Sc.-I and B.Com. groups. However the total no. of sentences produced by both the genders are almost the same. Moreover B.A. (P) learners show
the progress as they move from the first year to the second year, from the second year to the third year respectively. One can say that the present English
program does not seem successful to increase the writing skill of the subjects in question except B.A.(P).
As far as word order errors are concerned, the total number of errors was divided by the total no. of sentences as well as total no. of words in order toshow the deviant word order errors produced by the learners in percentages. Based on the above tables and figures one can readily notice the following
characteristics:
The percentages of errors have gone down as the learners proceed from the first year to the second year, from the second year to the third year in
all the groups.
The no. of word order errors produced by the male learners are more in comparison with the no. of word order errors produced by the female
learners among all the groups.
The highest word order errors are produced by B.A. (P)-I year male learners.
The lowest word order errors are produced by B.A. (H)-III year Female learners.
The female learners among all the groups reflect the significant progress because their errors go down to the minimum in the subsequent years.
So one can explicitly say that the knowledge of word order errors are constantly improving as there is a decrease in word order errors when the learners
move from the first year to the second year, from the second year to the third year in all the groups.
We can say it differently that there is some remarkable improvement in the performance of the learners in all the twelve groups of the learners as they
Based on the overall performance in Free composition writings one can readily deduce the following points: B.A (H) groups of learners have produced the highest no. of words and sentences i.e. 21334 and 1658.
B.A. (P) groups of learners have produced the smallest sentences i.e. 11 words /sentence.
B.Com. groups of learners have produced the largest sentences i.e. 16 words /sentence
B.A (H) groups of learners have produced the lowest no. of word order errors.
B.A. (P) groups of learners have produced highest no. of word order errors. B.A. (P) and B.A (H) groups of learners have shown the better progress in no. of words and sentences as the learners ascend from the level one t o two
and from two to three consecutively except B.Com-III and B.A.(H)-II.
B.A. (P) and B.A (H) groups of learners have also shown the better the progress in mean word per sentence. Almost all the groups have shown the progress because there is a drop in the amount of errors as the learners ascend from the level one to two and from two to
three consecutively except B.Com-III and B.A.(H)-II.
The persistence of errors in B.Com-III and B.A.(H)-II reveals that the program failed to reduce such errors to a minimum level.
Statistics of Different Types of Word order ErrorsMethods of Error CountingThe same error produced more than once in a sentence and all the occurrences of the errors have been counted separately for each one of the
twelve groups of the learners. Two occurrences of the same type of the error in different sentences are counted as two errors. The percentage
is calculated with reference to both, the total no. of sentences and total no. of words.
Classification and Tabulation of Errors
The study has been carried out within the framework of EA. So the errors produced by the twelve different groups of learners have been
classified on the basis of grammatical categories/subcategories in the following modes as they appeared in their script:
Error in order of Quantifier
Error in order of Negation
Error in order of Determiner
Error in order of Connector
Error in order of Auxiliary
Error in order of Adverb
Error in order of Preposition Error in order of Possessive Pron.
Error in order of Adjective
Error in order of Wh-word
Error in order of Reflexive
Error in order of Complementizer
Error in order of Indirect Object
Error in order of 'to' Infinitive
Error in order of Gerund
Error in order of Quantifier
Gender B.Sc.-I B .Sc.-II B.Sc.-III B.Com.-I B.Com.-II
It is quite evident from the above table and figure that the error in order of quantifier is highest in case of B.Sc.-II and B.A.(H)-II but it is also interesting to note that female learners of only
B.Com.-I and II have committed the error in the order of quantifier. The table and figure does also reflect significant progress in learning of the order of quantifier while the l earners pursue
the prescribed courses of undergraduate English program of Du as no learner has produced such error among all the groups in their final years.
Error in order of Negation
Gender B.Sc.-I B.Sc.-II
B.Sc.-
III
B.Com.-
I B.Com.-II
B.Com.-
III
B.A. (P)-
I
B.A. (P)-
II
B.A.(P)-
III
B.A. (H)-
I
B.A. (H)-
II
B.A.(H)-
III
Male 3 2 1 2 0 2 5 0 0 0 2 1
Female 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
As far as the error in the order of negation is concerned, B.A.(P)-I group have produced the highest among all the groups. One can readily notice through
the aforesaid table and figure that this group has not repeated the error in the consecutive following years. This reflects that English program has positively
affected the learners during their course. The performance of the B.A.(H) group reveals that the program failed to reduce such error. One can also notice
that B.Com. group of learners have better linguistic competence in order of negation among all the groups of the learners. The overall performance shows
that the female group has better competence in negation in comparison with the male group because the male group has produced the highest error.
Error In Order of Determiner
Gender B.Sc.-I B.Sc.-II
B.Sc.-
III
B.Com.-
I B.Com.-II
B.Com.-
III
B.A. (P)-
I
B.A. (P)-
II
B.A.(P)-
III
B.A.
(H)-I
B.A.
(H)-II
B.A.(H)-
III
Male 4 0 5 1 2 3 2 3 2 1 0 0
Female 0 1 0 2 1 2 3 0 4 0 0 0
B.Sc. male learners do not show improvement in use of the order of determiner as their errors do persist as they ascend from the first year to third year.One can find no improvement with B.Com and B.A.(P) group of learners as the data and the figure reflect. Moreover we find an amazing performance 0f
English Major group of learners with zero error in the order of determiner. Overall performance in order of determiner shows that performance of female
group is better in comparison with the male group.
B.Com.-I female learners shows very poor performance in use of order of connector as it is reflected through the table and the figure and one can’t find
any improvement with B. Com. and B.A.(P) female group of learners as the error persists while the learner ascend to the third year. Both the male and the
female have produced almost the equal amount of such error. One can also find the B.Sc. female learners have performed better among all the groups of
B.A.(P)-I male group produce the highest amount of error in order of preposition. This error is persisting in this group even in the final year so one can
assume that the English program is failed to improve such errors to these learners. One can also readily notice that B.Sc. and B.A.(H) group of learners have
performed better among all the groups in the use of order of preposition.
Error In Order of Possessive Pronoun
The highest error in order of possessive pronoun is produced by B.Sc.-I female learners. It is interesting to note that B.Com. female and B.A.(P) male
learners have performed better among all the groups of the learners with zero error in the use of order of possessive pronoun. All the groups have shown
the significant progress in order of possessive pronoun with zero error in their third year of the learning.
The highest errors in order of adjective is produced by B.A.(H)-II male learners where as the lowest error is shown by B.Com.-I ,II and B.A.(H)-III learners. No
group has shown the significant progress as they ascend to the third year. However the female learners have committed less errors in comparison with the
male learners in the use of the order of adjective.
One each error in order of ‘to’ infinitive is produced by the B.Sc.-III, B.Com-I&III and B.A.(P)-I where as the maximum error i.e. two is produced by B.A.(P)-II
and B.A.(H)-I of the learners. Only B.Sc. female, B.Com. male, B.A.(P) and B.A.(H) group of learners show the progress as they ascend to the third year of
the program.
Error In Order of Gerund
The performance of B.A.(H) male group of learners demonstrates poor progress in the use of Gerund because the error still persists as these learners
ascend to the third year of the program. One can point out that the program is failed to bring such error at zero level.
Gender B.Sc.-I B.Sc.-II
B.Sc.-
III
B.Com.-
I B.Com.-II
B.Com.-
III
B.A. (P)-
I
B.A. (P)-
II
B.A.(P)-
III
B.A.
(H)-I
B.A.
(H)-II
B.A.(H)-
III
Male 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2
Female 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hierarchy of Word Order Errors (Irrespective of Gender)
As mentioned above in the chapter three LAT is composed of six questions. Question one deals with the order of different grammatical
categories i.e. Determiner, Auxiliary, Direct object, Indirect object Negation, Modifiers, Prepositions and Adverbials which have been
objectively evaluated. Question no. two is meant to evaluate the subjects’ competence in the use of modifiersbefore a noun as well as toevaluate their knowledge in the use of the order of modifiers.
The third question is meant to assess the learners’ competence in the use of different English adverbials in a sentence.
The fourth, fifth and the sixth questions are meant to assess the learners’ competence in the use of English preposition and wh-words in a
sentence.
Thus, the various questions of the LAT test will be analyzed and discussed in some detail in the following sections.
The Scores of the First Three Groups (B.Sc.)
Question one of LAT is intended to test learners’ familiarity with correct orders of the different grammatical categories such as determiner , noun , direct
object , indirect object, adjective, adverb, preposition, verb (auxiliary and main verb), connector and so on(for more details see section ………. in chapter
three and appendix A). This question consists of five items and each question is marked out of five marks. The above figure shows the scores of the first
group i.e. B.Sc. on this question.
The scores of the learners on this question show that the female learners have performed better in comparison with the male learners in all the three years
of the program. The score of the female learners on this question is 87.3% whereas the score of the male learners is 71.3% on the same question. This
reveals that the female learners are yet linguistically better equipped than the male learners on this question. It is also interesting to note that the scores of
second year B.Sc. male group of learners reflect no progress as they enter the second year. One can say that their learning got stagnant and the dominating
factors may be the methodology of the present English Program as well as the learning teaching context. But these learners show progress in the final year
of the program where as the female group of learners show the progress right from the first year to the second and the third year.
Group Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Total
B.Sc. Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Question two of LAT aims to test the learners’ ability to use the maximum no. of English modifiers before a noun correctly. It consists of nouns and
modifiers and subjects were required to write as many modifiers as they wanted. The use of one modifier before a noun carried one mark and the use of
two modifiers before a noun carried two marks and so on and the range of evaluation was set from one mark to five marks. Outlined below is the
performance of the first three groups of learners in the second question.
The scores of the learners indicate that their performances on this question are poor. They don’t even show any kind of progress as they ascend from the
first year to the third year. This may be due to the limited exposure they get in English modifiers and also may be due to heavy reliance on Hindi as the Hindi
speakers use less no. of modifiers before a noun. Though the performance of the learners on this question is not up to a standard yet the female learners
have scored 42% against the 33.3% of the male learners.
Question three focuses on the learners’ ability in using the English adverbials and this question is marked out of five marks. The above figure shows the
scores of the first three groups of the learners on this question.
The performance of the learners of these groups shows the continuous progress on question three as the learners ascend from the first year to the second
as well as to the third year. The scores of the female learners on this question are also better than the scores of the male learners as the scores of the
female learners on this question is 79.3% against the scores of the male learners i.e. 72.6%.
Question four intends to examine the learners’ ability to place the English preposition at appropriate place in a sentence. This is also marked out of five
marks.
The female learners of this group shows the best performance on this question with the highest scores i.e. 50 or 100% whereas the performance of the
male learners go down when these learners ascend from the first year to the third year. This reveals that the females have better competence than the
males on this question.
Question five intends to examine the learners’ ability to write wh- sentences in English language. This question is marked out of five marks. Both male and
the female learners show the progress during three years of English program. One can say that the female learners show better progress in comparison
with males on this question as the score of the female learners is 77.3% whereas the score of the male learners is 70%.
Question six is designed to test the learners’ competence in the use of order of wh-words in English sentences. The scores of the female learners on this
question are better than the scores of the male learners as the female learners on this question have scored 68.6% whereas the male learners have scored
56.6 on this question. It is also interesting to note that the male subjects on this question don’t show any significant progress whereas the female subjects
do. One can say that the progress of the females on this question is better than that of the male.
The Scores of the Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Groups (B.Com.)
Group Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Total
B.Com. Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
As question one of LAT intends to test learners’ familiarity with correct orders of the different grammatical categories such as determiner , noun , direct
object , indirect object, adjective, adverb, preposition, verb (auxiliary and main verb), connector.(for more detai ls see section ………. in chapter three and
appendix A). Each question is marked out of five marks. The above figure shows the scores of the second group i.e. B.Com. on this question.
The figure explicitly reveals that the female learners have performed better in comparison with the male learners in all the three years of the program. The
score of the female learners on this question is 96.6% whereas the score of the male learners is 84% on the same question. This reveals that the female
learners are yet linguistically better equipped than the male learners on this question. The figure above also shows that the scores of the male learners of
these groups reflect no progress as they enter the second year and third year of their program. One can say that their learning goes down in their following
two years of the program and the dominating factors may be the methodology of the present English Program as well as the learning teaching context.
The aim of this question is to test the learners’ ability to use the maximum no. of English modifiers before a noun correctly. The use of one modifier before
a noun carried one mark and the use of two modifiers before a noun carried two marks and the range of evaluation was from one mark to five marks.
The scores of the learners indicate that their performances on this question are poor. Even they don’t show any kind of significant progress as they ascend
from the first year to the third year. Once we look at the performance of B.Sc. learners on this question one can say that the scenario is the same. In spite of
the poor performance the % of scores for the female learners is better (48.6%) in comparison with the male learners i.e. 41.3%.
Question three reflects the learners’ ability in using the English adverbials and each question is marked out of five marks. The above figure shows the scores
of the learners on this question.
The performance of the learners of group four, five and six shows no significant progress on this question three as the learners ascend from the first year to
the second as well as to the third year as the figure reflects that the scores of the learners in their final years of the program on this question have gone
down. Still overall % of score of the female learners is 78% in comparison with the male learners i.e.70%
The question four examines the learners’ ability to place the English preposition at appropriate place in a sentence. This is also marked out of five marks.
The learners of these groups do not show the significant progress as they ascend from the first year to the second year and from the second year to the
third year of the program. But overall % of the scores on this question shows the female learners of these groups have scored 98.6% whereas the male
Question five intends to examine the learners’ ability to write wh- sentences in English language. Each question is marked out of five marks. Both male and
the female learners show the progress during three years of English program except the male learners of group five. One can say that the female learners
show better progress in comparison with the male learners on this question as the overall % of the scores on this question for the female learners is 78%
and % of the scores of the male learners is 67.3%.
Question six is designed to test the learners’ competence in the use of order of wh-words in English sentences. The scores of the female learners in the first
two years of the program on this question are almost the same but the scores of the male learners are not so significant because these learners do show
any growth during three years of the program. As the male subjects on this question don’t show any significant progress whereas the female subjects with
75.3% of the scores show the progress in the final year of the program. One can say that the progress of the females on this question is better than that of
the males.
The Scores of the Seven, Eight and Nine Groups
0
5
10
1520
25
30
35
40
45
50
1st. Year 2nd. Year 3rd. Year
32
25
29
34 33
46
Q6 Male
Q6 Female
Group Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Total
B.A.(P) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
The above table & figure show the scores of seven, eight and nine groups i.e. B.A.(P) on the aforesaid question. The female and the male learners of these
groups reflect the continuous progress as they enter the second and the third year of the program. The figure also reveals that the male and the female
learners on this question in their second year of the program almost show the equal scores i.e. 37 and 38. In spite of that the male learners have performed
better in comparison with the female learners with a slight difference in all the three years of the program. The score of the male learners on this question
is 69.3% whereas the score of the female learners is 68.6% on the same question. This reveals that the male and the female learners of these groups do not
show any significant difference in learning of English word order.
As question two aims to test the learners’ ability to use the maximum no. of English modifiers before a noun correctly. It consists of nouns and modifiers
and subjects were required to write as many modifiers as they wanted. The use of one modifier before a noun carried one mark and the use of two
modifiers before a noun carried two marks. The scores of these groups of learners indicate that the performances of the female learners are quite
progressive in comparison with the male learners on this question. The scores of the male learners are equal i.e.19 as they ascend from the second year to
the third year. This may be due to the limited exposure they get in English on modifiers or one can say it differently that the program fails to increase the
learners’ competence on the use of modifiers before a noun.
Question three focuses on the learners’ ability in using the English adverbials and this question is marked out of five marks. The above figure shows the
scores of the learners on this question.
The performance of the learners of these groups shows the progress on question three as the learners ascend from the first year to the second and to the
third year. The scores of the male learners on this question are also better than the scores of the female learners. The scores of these groups give us a
different image as the overall scores of the male learners are 71.3% whereas the female learners have scored only 64%.
Question four intends to examine the learners’ ability to place the English preposition at appropriate place in a sentence. This is also marked out of five
marks.
Both the female and the learners of this group shows the better performance on this question with the highest scores i.e. 50 or 100% in the second as well
as in the third year. This reveals that the program is highly effective to these learners on this question as the overall scores of the male and the female
learners on this question are 91% and 96.6% respectively.
As it has been mentioned earlier that question one of LAT is intended to test learners’ familiarity with correct orders of the words of the different
grammatical categories such as determiner , noun , direct object , indirect object, adjective, adverb, preposition, verb (auxiliary and main verb), connector
and so on(for more details see section ………. in chapter three and appendix A). This question consists of five items and each question is marked out of fivemarks. The above figure shows the scores of the first group i.e. B.A.(H) on this question.
The scores of these groups of learners on this question show that the female learners have performed better in comparison with the male learners in all the
three years of the program. The score of the female learners on this question is 96.6% whereas the score of the male learners is 89.3% on the same
question. This reveals that the female learners are yet linguistically better equipped than the male learners on this question. It is also interesting to note
that the scores the male group of learners of second year B.A.(H) reflect no progress as they enter the second year. One can say that their learning got
stagnant and the dominating factors may be the methodology of the present English Program as well as the learning teaching context. But these learners
show progress in the final year of the program where as the female group of learners show the progress right from the first year to the second but their
learning competence goes down in the third year as the figure is reflecting .
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
1st. Year 2nd. Year 3rd. Year
44
42
48
46
50
49
Q1 Male
Q1 Female
The Scores of the Tenth,
Eleventh and Twelfth Groups
Group Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Total
B.A.(H)E Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Question two aims to test the learners’ ability to use the maximum no. of English modifiers before a noun correctly. It consists of nouns and modifiers and
subjects were required to write as many modifiers as they wanted. The use of one modifier before a noun carried one mark and the use of two modifiers
before a noun carried two marks and so on and the range of evaluation was set from one mark to five marks. Outlined below is the performance of the
tenth, eleventh and the twelfth groups of learners on the second question.
The scores of these groups of learners indicate that their performances on this question are not up to a standard as these learners belong to English major
group. Even they don’t show any kind of progress as they ascend from the first year to the third year. This may be due to the limited exposure they get in
English modifiers and also it may be due to interference of their mother tongue i.e. Hindi as the Hindi speakers use less no. of modifiers before a noun.
This question focuses on the learners’ ability in using the English adverbials and this question is also marked out of five marks. The above figure shows the
scores of the tenth, eleventh and twelfth groups of the learners on this question.
The performance of the learners of these groups shows that the scores of these learners in the second year of the program have gone down. It puts
question mark on the pedagogy of the second year program. Once we look at the scores of the final year the learners show a remarkable progress. It
indicates the increase of the learners’ competence in the use of English adverbials in the final year of the program. The overall score of the female learners
on this question is also better (i.e. 88%) than the score of the male learners (i.e.82%).
As question four intends to examine the learners’ ability to place the English preposition at appropriate place in a sentence. This is also ma rked out of five
marks. The male and the female learners of these groups show the best performance on this question with the highest scores i.e. 50 or 100%. It shows that
the program has definitely helped these learners on this question. It also indicates that the male and the female learners of these groups are well equipped
in the use of English preposition.
As the question is intended to examine the learners’ ability to write wh- sentences in English language and it is marked out of five marks. Both the male and
the female learners show the progress during three years of English program but the female learners got stagnant in the second year of the program as the
score of the first and the second year is the same but the score of the male learners in the same year has gone down. One can say that the program could
not affect these learners to even maintain the knowledge of the first year. The overall score shows that the female learners do better (i.e. 87.3%) in
comparison with the male learners (i.e.74%) on this question.
consecutive three years of the English program on question one. So the program does definitely help these learners on this question. As far as the So the
program does definitely help these learners on this question. As far as the scores of these learners on question two are concerned it shows that the
learners’ performances have gown down. It indicates the failure of the learning and teaching methodology on this question. The learners of group one, two
and three shows the progress in consecutive three years of the English program on question three. One can say that the program has definitely helped
these learners on this question. The scores of the learners on question four puts a question mark on the existing program as well as its learning teaching
methodology as the performances of these learners have gown down in three consecutive years of the program. The scores of these learners on question
five are not so significant as these learners show the progress on this question only in the second year of the program but their performances have gone
down in the final year of the program. One can say that the program didn’t help these learners even to maintain their previous competence on this
question. Interestingly, the learners of group one, two and three shows the progress of learning in consecutive three years of the English program on
question six but the scores of these learners are very less (62.6%) in comparison with the scores of these learners on the other questions except on
question two(i.e.37.6%). However one can say that the program does definitely help these learners on this question.
The abovementioned table and figure which are irrespective to gender show the progress of learning by the learners of group four, five and six in
consecutive three years of the English program on question one to six. . The learners of group four, five and six do not show the progress of learning in
consecutive three years of the English program on question one. So looking at the performance of these learners, one can say that the performance of
these learners has somehow got stagnant. What contributes to this stagnation is the fact these learners get overloaded with B.Com. core subjects. As a
result, the program and methodology seem to have negatively affected the linguistic competence of these learners. As far as the scores of these learners on
question two are concerned it shows that the learners’ performances have gown down in the final year of the program. It indicates the failure of the
learning and teaching methodology as well as overloading of core subjects at some extend. The learners’ scores of group four, five and six on question three
shows that their performances have gone down in three years of the English program. One can say that the program is failed to meet the learners’ need.
The scores of the learners on question four show that the learners’ performance goes down in the second year of the program but these learners show
better performance in their third year of the program. One can say that it may be due to the learner. It may put a question mark on the existing program as
well as its learning teaching methodology as the performances of these learners have gown down in the second year of the program. The scores of these
learners on question five are not so significant as these learners show the progress on this question only in the final year of the program but their
performances have gone down in the second year of the program. One can say that the program didn’t help these learners even to maintain their previouscompetence of the first year on this question. Interestingly, the learners of group four, five and six show the progress of learning in their first and final year
whereas their performances go down in the second year of the English program on question six. But the scores of these learners are very less (i.e.66.3%)in
comparison with the scores of these learners on the other questions except question two(i.e.45%). However one can say that the program does definitely
help these learners in first and third year of the program on this question.
The Scores of Group Four, Five and Six(Irrespective of
The above table and figure which are irrespective of genders shows the progress of learning by the learners of group seven, eight and nine in consecutive
three years of the English program on question one. So the program does definitely help these learners on this question. As far as the scores of these
learners on question two are concerned though it shows the progress in learning in the consecutive three years of the program but their growths are in very
less amount i.e. the overall score is only 35 %. One may point out that this may be due to learners’ factors as the learners of these groups are those whosescores are generally less in their twelfth classes. The learners of group seven, eight and nine show the progress in consecutive three years of the English
program on question three. One can say that the program has definitely helped these learners on this question. The scores of the learners on question four
puts a question mark on the existing program as well as its learning teaching methodology as the performances of these learners got stagnant in the third
year of the program. The scores of these learners on question five are not so significant as these learners show the progress on this question only in the
final year of the program but their performances have got stagnant in the second year of the program. One can say that the program didn’t help these
learners on this question. Interestingly, the learners of group seven, eight and nine show that their learning got stagnant in the final year of the English
program on question six but the scores of these learners are very less( i.e.60.3%) in comparison with the scores of these learners on the other questions
except question two (i.e.35%) . However one can say that the program does definitely help these learners in the second year of the program on this
question.
The Scores Group Seven, Eight and Nine (Irrespective of
Table …..and figure …………….which are irrespective of genders show the progress of learning by the learners of group ten, eleven and twelve in consecutive
three years of the English program on question one. . The learners of group ten, eleven and twelve show the progress of learning in consecutive three years
of the English program on question one. So the program does definitely help these learners on this question. Though the scores of these learners on
question two show the progress in learning in the consecutive three years of the program yet their growths are in very less amount i.e. the overall score is
only 46.3 %. We can assume that the teaching methodology and the program have not been highly effective to these learners. The scores of the learners of
group ten, eleven and twelve on question three show the progress only in the final year of the English program. One can say that the program did not prove
effective to these learners in the second year as a result their scores went down in this year of the program. The scores of the learners on question four
puts a question mark on the existing program as well as its learning teaching methodology as the performances of these learners got stagnant in all theyears of the program. The scores of these learners on question five are not so significant as these learners show the progress on this question only in the
final year of the program but their performances have gone down in the second year of the program. One can say that the program didn’t help these
learners in the second year on this question. The scores of the learners of group ten, eleven and twelve on question six show the progress of learning in
consecutive three years of the English program. So the program does definitely help these learners on this question.
The performance of the male and the female learners of B.Sc., B.Com., B.A.(P) and B.A.(H) groups show that the female learners are well equipped with
75.7%, 79.2%, 65.5% and 84.8% of the scores in comparison with the male learners whose scores are 65.3%, 68.8%, 64.2% and 75.1% respectively. One
can also find that the female learners of all these groups reflect progress in learning in all three consecutive years of the program whereas the male learners
do not show such feature. It indicates that the female learners are more benefitted by the program in comparison with the male learners and also B.A.(H)
group of learners are more affected by the program in comparison with the other groups.
By looking at the overall performance, one can readily notice that B.A.(H) group of learners with the highest scores of 1430/79.4% are better among the
learners of the aforesaid groups. B.A.(P) group of learners stands lowest in the hierarchy of the scores with 1177/65.38%. It reflects that the learners of
B.A.(H) are highly affected by the program among the learners of the other groups whereas as the learners of B.A.(P) are less affected among these groups.
What contributes to this group i.e. B.A.(P) which is less affected by the program is the fact that these groups of learners are linguistically not so strong as
the class 12th score of these learners are less among the learners of all the other groups.
The mean responses of the first, the second and the third group of the learners on the second statement (i.e. The courses enhance the learning of
English structure) are 2.2, 2.4, 3, 2.4, 2.6 and 2.1 respectively. The responses of the first group of learners are clustered to ‘agree’ category. In terms
of percentages, 70% of the male respondents are agreed whereas 30% of them are neutral on the statement. In case of female respondents, 60%of
them are agreed and 40% are neutral on the statement. One can say that the learners of this group understand the structure of English. The
responses of the males of the second group of learners are clustered to ‘neutral’ category. In terms of %, 100% of the male respondents are neutral
on the statement. It shows that the learners are neutral on the statement. In case of the female learners of the same group, 60% of them are
agreed and 40% of them are neutral on the statement. It indicates that the program enhances the females of this group in learning of English
structure. The mean scores of the third group of learners reflect a different picture. 60% of the male respondents are ‘neutral’ and 40% are agreed
on the statement. It means majority of the learners understand English structure.
With the mean responses of 2.9, 2.7, 2.1, 2.3, 2.7 and 2.2 the attitude of the male and female learners of group four, five and six is fluctuating
between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. To be specific, 90% of the male respondents of group four are neutral on the statement whereas 70% of the
female respondents are neutral and 30% of them are agreed with the statement. It means the majority of male learners of this group are undecided
upon the statement in comparison the female learners. 50% of the male respondents of group five understand the English structure whereas 50%
of them are not sure but 70% of the female learners of the same group understand the structure in English. One can say that only the majority of
the female learners of this group understand English structure. 80% of the female subjects of group six agree with the statement. It means the
female of this group show better progress in comparison with the males on English structure in three years of learning.
The mean responses of group seven, eight and nine show a different image. The mean of the male and female learners of these groups are 2.7, 2.3,
2.8, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.2. It shows that the responses of these learner groups are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. In term of
percentages, 70% of the male respondents of group seven are neutral while 30% of them are agreed on the statement whereas 70% of the female
respondents of this group are agreed and 30% of them are neutral. It indicates that the majority of the male learners of this group are neutral on
the statement but majority of the female learners of this group are agreed with the statement. The male and the female learners of group eight
reflect a different image. 80% of the male respondents of this group are neutral while only 20% of them are agreed with the statement but at the
other hand 50% of the female respondents of this group are agreed and 50% of them are neutral. It indicates that the majority of the male learners
of this group better learn the structure in English whereas half of the female learners of this group understand the structure in English but half of
them are neutral on the statement. The male and the female learners of group nine show a different picture i.e. half of the male respondents of this
group are neutral and half of them are agreed with the statement whereas 80% of the female respondents of this group are agreed while only 20%
of them are neutral on the statement. It indicates that the majority of the female learners of this group understand the structure in English whereas
half of the male learners of this group understand the structure in English while half of them are neutral on the statement.
The mean of the male and the female respondents of group ten, eleven and twelfth (i.e. 1.8, 2.1, 2, 2, 1.8 and 2) is clustered to agree category. In
term of percentages, 100% of the male respondents and 80% of the female respondents of group ten understand the structure in English whereas100% of the male and the female respondents of group eleven are agreed with the statement and 100% of the male respondents and 90% of the
female respondents of group twelfth understand the structure in English. It means these groups of learners are better equipped with knowledge of
structure in English.
3.The present English program is very interesting
Level Gender Count Minimum Maximum Mean
Standard
Deviation
Level Gender Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
B.Sc.-I Male 10 2 3 3.1 0.737865 B.Sc.-I Male 10 0 2 5 3 0
Keeping in mind the data present in Table…… &…….. one notices that the mean responses of group one, two & three subjects fluctuate between ‘agree’
and ‘neutral’ categories as it is reflected by the mean scores of their responses i.e. 3.1, 2.1, 3, 2.9, 3 & 2.5. One can also notice that the responses of the
male learners of all these three groups are clustered to neutral category whereas the responses of the females of these groups on this statement are
fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. In term of percentages, 50%, 60% and 100% of the male respondents of the aforesaid groups are neutral
on the statement whereas 70% and 50% of the female respondents of group one and three are agreed with the statement. This shows that the female
learners of these groups are more interested in the present English program in comparison with the male learners.
The responses of the fourth and the sixth group of learners are fluctuating between the category ’agree’ and ‘neutral’ (i.e. the mean responses of the male
and the female learners are 2.8, 2.7, 1.7, 1.8, 2.3 &2.3)whereas the responses of the fif th group are clustered to ‘agree’ category. To be specific, 80% of the
male respondents and 70% of the female respondents of group four are neutral on the statement. It means the majority of the learners of this group are
neutral. 70 to 90% of the male and female respondents of group five are agreed with statement. It indicates that the present program is interesting to this
group of the learners. It is interesting to note the equal mean responses i.e. 2.3 for both the genders of group six but in term of percentages 70% of the
male and 90% of the female learners are agreed with the statement. It means the majority of the learners of this group are also much interested in the
program.
Once we look at the mean responses of the male and the female of group seven, eight and nine we find a different picture. The mean responses of these
groups which are 2.8, 2.6, 2.7, 2.4, 2.5 and 2 show that their responses are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. In terms of percentages, 60%
of the male and the female respondents of group seven are agreed on the statement. It means the majority of the learners are interested in the program
but 70% of the male respondents of group eight are neutral whereas 30% of them are agreed with the statement but at the other hand we find that 60% of
the females are agreed and 40% of them are neutral on the statement. It shows that the females of this group better understand the program than the
male learners. The learners of group nine reflects a different image, half of the male subjects of this group are agreed whereas half of them are neutral on
the statement but 80% females of this group are agreed with the statement. So, one can say that the female learners are more interested in the program in
comparison with the male learners.
The mean responses of group ten, eleven and twelve show that these learners are more interested in the English program in comparison with the learners
of the rest of the groups. 60%, 80%, 100%, 100%, 90% and 90% of the male and the female respondents of the aforesaid groups are agreed on the
statement. It shows that these learners the most interested in the program.
Data based on irrespective of genders show that the most of the responses of the learners are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category except the
learners of the five, six, nine, ten, eleven and twelve because the responses of these learners are clustered to ‘agree’ category.
The overall performances of these learners show that the learners are interested in the English program. However, the learners of B.Sc. group are neutral
on the statement.
4. I understand the structure of English language i.e. SVO.
Irrespective of Year (Level) Irrespective of Year (Level)
Level Count Minimum Maximum Mean Standard
Deviation Level Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)B.Sc. 60
1 42.1 0.817209
B.Sc.-I 60 13 32 11 4 0
100% 21.66% 53.33% 18.33% 6.66%
B.Com. 601 4
2.15 0.684593
B.Com.-
II
60 9 34 16 1 0
100% 15% 56.66% 26.66% 1.66%
B.A. (P) 601 4
2.1 0.399162
B.A.
(P)-I
60 1 53 5 1 0
100% 1.66% 83.33% 8.33% 1.66%
B.A. (H) 601 4
1.983334 0.724684
B.A.(H)-
III
60 15 32 12 1 0
100% 25% 53.33% 20% 1.66%
The mean scores of the group one are 1.9 and 1.8 for both the genders. It means the responses of the group one on the statement of
structure of English language are clustered to agree category. To be specific, 80% of the male learners and 100% of the female learnersof the same group are agreed with the statement. It means the learners of this group have knowledge of English structure. Though the
mean scores of both the genders of group two are 2.6 and their attitudes on this statement are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and
‘neutral’ category but 50% of the male respondents are agreed whereas 40% of them are neutral on the statement. At the otherhand,
60% of the female respondents are agreed and 20% of them are neutral. It shows the majority of the female learners understand the
structure in English language. The male and female learners of group three reflect a different image i.e. the mean scores of them are
1.9 and 2.1. It means the mean responses of them are clustered to agree category on the statement. 70 to 90% of the females and the
males of this group are agreed with the statement. It means the majority of the learners this group is better equipped with knowledge
of structure in English.
The mean responses of group four, five and six show the different pictures as their mean responses are 2.2, 2.1, 1.8, 2.2, 1.9 and 2.7. It
the responses of some of the learners are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category and some of them are clustered to ‘agree’
category. To clarify these more, 80 to 90% of the male and the female learners of group four understand the structure in English
whereas 80% of group five and six except the female learners of group six understand the statement. It means except the female
learners of group six the majority of the learners understand structure in English.
The mean scores of group seven, eight and nine i.e. 2.3, 2.1,2.1, 2.2, 2 and 1.9 show that the responses of these groups are fluctuating
between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category except the responses of the males and the females of group nine that is clustered to agree
category. 80 to 100% of the male and the female learners of these groups understand the English structure whereas as 10 to 20% of
them are neutral. It means maximum learners of these groups understand English structure.
The image of group ten, eleven and twelve is almost equal to the image of group seven, eight and nine i.e. the mean scores of these
groups are 2.3, 2.2, 2, 2.4, 1.5 and 1.5. It means the responses of these groups are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category
except the responses of the males and the females of group twelve and the males of group eleven that is clustered to agree. 50%
females and 100% of the male learners group eleven understand structure in English whereas 100% of the female learners of group
twelve and 80% of the males of this group understand English structure. It means only the female learners of ten and eleven d o face
problems in learning of English structure.
Once we look at data which is based on irrespective of gender one can easily find that the responses of most of the learners are
fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category except the responses of the males and the females of group one, three, five, nineand twelve that is clustered to agree category i.e. 80 to 100% of the male and the female learners of these groups understand the
the statement. Once these learners enter their final year of the course, they show the significant change in the learning of adverb word order
as we find that 60% of the male respondents and 80% of the female respondents are agreed on the statement. It is interesting to note the
respondents of group ten, eleven and twelve i.e. B.A.(H) English who easily understand adjective word order as the mean scores of both the
genders of these groups are 2.5, 2.2, 2,2, 2.4 & 2.4. So their responses are clustered to ‘agree’ category. In terms of %, 70% to 100%
respondents of these groups are agreed on the statement.
Once we look at data i.e. irrespective of gender, one can say that the learners’ responses areon the statement are divided into three parts, the
responses of the learners in part one i.e. group five, six, nine, ten, eleven & twelve is clustered to ‘agree’ category. To be specific, 60% to 100%
learners of these groups are agreed on the statement. It means these learners understand adverb word order in English. In part two and threethe learners’ responses are fluctuating among ‘agree’, ‘neutral’ & ‘disagree’ category. One can say that some of the learners of these groups
understand adverb word order, some of them are undecided whether adverbial word order in English is easy or difficult and some of them feel
difficult to learn this word order.
Overall performance of the learners show that only B.A.(H) group of learners understand adverb word order. The responses of the learners of
the other groups are fluctuating among ‘agree’, ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. . One can say that some of the learners of these groups
understand adverb word order, some of them are undecided whether adverbial word order in English is easy or difficult and some of them feel
difficult to learn this word order.
7. The position & order of Prepositions in English is very easy to understand.
Level Gender Count Minimum Maximum Mean
Standard
Deviation Level Gender Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
B.Sc.-I Male 10 1 5 3.5 1.433721 B.Sc.-I Male 10 1 2 1 3 3
Irrespective of Year (Level) Irrespective of Year (Level)
Level Count Minimum Maximum Mean Standard
Deviation Level Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
B.Sc. 601 5
3.016667 1.228115
B.Sc. 60 7 18 7 23 5
100% 11.66% 30% 11.66% 38.33 8.33%
B.Com. 601 4
2.500001 0.770227
B.Com. 60 4 28 22 6 0
100% 6.66% 46.66% 36.66% 10%
B.A. (P) 602 4
3.216667 0.555164
B.A. (P) 60 0 4 39 17 0
100% 6.66% 65% 28.33%
B.A. (H) 601 4
2.366667 0.7584
B.A.(H) 60 5 33 17 5 0
100% 8.33% 55% 28.33% 8.33%
The mean scores of the learners on the statement (i.e. The position & order of Prepositions in English is very easy to understand.) are
3.5, 2.2, 4.2, 2.9, 2.1 &3.2. The responses of the male learners of group three and the responses of the female learners of group one are
clustered to ‘agree’ category. In term of % , 70% of the male learners of group three and the same % of females of group one are
agreed on the statement. One can say that the males and the females of these groups easily understand the order of preposition in
English. The mean responses of the learners of the other groups are fluctuating among ‘agree’, ‘neutral’ & ‘disagree’ category. In terms
of %, only 30% of the male respondents of group one understand the order of preposition in English whereas 60% of them feel
difficulty to understand the order of preposition in English. 100% of the male learners of group two feel difficulty to understand the
order of preposition whereas 50% of the female learners of the same group understand this order whereas 40% of them feel difficulty
to understand this order. 60% of the female learners of group three also face difficulty in learning of the order of preposition.
The mean responses of group four, five and six are 2.9, 2.6, 2.2, 2.2, 2.3, & 2.8. It indicates that the learners’ responses are fluctuating
between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category except the learners of group five and the male learners of group six. In terms of %, only 30% of
the male learners of group four understand this order whereas 50% of them are undecided and 10 % of them rather feel difficult to
understand. In case of the female learners of this group, 50% of them understand this order but 40% of them are undecided and 10% of
them rather feel difficult to understand.70% of the learners of group five are agreed with the statement. One can say that the males
and the females of this group easily understand the order of preposition in English. 60% of the male respondents and 40% of the
female respondents of group six are agreed on the statement whereas 40% of the males and the females of the same group are neutral
on the statement. one can say that the performance of the learners of these groups have gone down in the final of the program as 70%
of these learners were agreed on the statement in their second year of the program. The mean responses of group seven, eight and
nine show a different image as their mean scores are 4, 3.3, 3.1, 3.1, 2.9 & 2.9. It indicates that the responses of the learners are
fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. 100% of the male respondents of group seven are disagreed on the statement
whereas 70% of the females are undecided on the statement. One can say that males of this group are facing difficulty while learning
the order of preposition in English and the females are not able to decide whether the learning of the order of preposition is easy or
difficult. 90% of the respondents of both the genders are neutral on the statement. It means the learners of this group are not able todecide whether the learning of the order of preposition is easy or difficult as 90% of the respondents of both the genders are neutral on
the statement. The status of the male respondents of group nine is same as 90% of them are still undecided on the statement even in
their final year of the program. One can say that the program failed to teach the order of preposition to these learners. But the female
Irrespective of Year (Level) Irrespective of Year (Level)
Level Count Minimum Maximum Mean Standard
Deviation Level Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
B.Sc. 601 4
2.966667 0.862943
B.Sc. 60 4 11 28 17 0
100% 6.66% 18.33% 46.66% 28.33
B.Com. 601 4
2.750001 0.815652
B.Com. 60 5 14 32 9 0
100% 8.33% 23.33% 53.33% 15%
B.A. (P) 602 4
3.516667 0.536533
B.A. (P) 60 0 1 27 32 0
100% 1,66% 45% 53.33%
B.A. (H) 601 4
2.466667 0.812355
B.A.(H) 60 6 26 22 6 0
100% 10% 43.33 36.66 10%
The mean scores of the males and the females of group one, two and three on the statement i.e. Direct & Indirect objects in English are
very easy to understand are 2.6, 2.4, 3.5, 3.2, 2.9 &3.2. It indicates that the responses of group one is fluctuating between ‘agree’ and
‘neutral’ category. 40% of the male and the female respondents of this group are agreed, 50% of them are undecided and 10% of them
are rather disagreed with the statement. It means half of the learners of this group are not able to decide whether the learning of
direct and indirect objects is easy or difficult. 50% of the male respondents of group two are neutral on the statement and 50% of them
are disagreed. It means half of the learners are undecided and half of them face difficulty in learning of direct and indirect object in
English. Only 10% of the female respondents are agreed with the statement whereas 60% of them are not able to decide whether the
learning of direct and indirect objects is easy or difficult. 50% of the male respondents of group three are neutral, 30% of them are
agreed and 20% of them are disagreed on the statement. It means half of them are not able to decide whether the learning of direct
and indirect objects is easy or difficult. 50% of the female respondents of the same group are disagreed, 30% of them are agreed and
20% of them are neutral on the statement. It means only 20% of them are not able to decide whether the learning of direct and
indirect objects is easy or difficult and 50% of the learners of this group face difficulty in learning of direct and indirect object in English.
With the mean scores of 2.9, 3, 2.6, 2.5, 2.1 &2.9,the responses of the learners of group four, five and six are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and
‘neutral’ but the responses of the female learners of group four are clustered to ‘neutral’ category. 70% of the male respondents of group four are
neutral whereas 20% of them are agreed on the statement. But 80% of the female respondents of this group are ‘neutral’ and 10% of them are
agreed on the statement. It indicates that the male and the female learners of this group are not able to decide whether the learning of direct and
indirect objects in English is easy or difficult. 50% of the male respondents of group five are agreed on the statement whereas 20% of them are
neutral and 30% of them are rather disagreed on the statement. One can say that only half of the male learners of this group understand direct and
indirect object in English. But 70% of the female learners of the same group understand direct and indirect object in English. It indicates that the
female learners of group five show better growth in learning of direct and indirect in comparison with the male learners of the same group in their
second year of the program. As the mean response of the male learners of group six are clustered to ‘agree’ category and 70% of the respondents
of this group are agreed on the statement, it indicates that the learners of these groups understand better in comparison with the second year of
their program. 30% of the female respondents of the same group are agreed, 40% of them are neutral and 30% of them are rather disagreed with
the statement. One can say that the learning attitude of the female learners of this group on direct and indirect object has gone down as we seethat 70% of the female learners of group five were agreed on the statement in their second year of the program. The mean responses of group
seven, eight and nine reflect that the learners of these groups either do not understand or they feel difficult to learn direct and indirect object in
English as the responses of these learners are fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. In terms of %, 90% of the male and the female
respondents of group seven are disagreed with the statement. It indicates that these learners face a typical problem in learning of direct and
indirect object in English. 60% of the males and 40% of the female respondents of group eight are neutral on the statement and 60% of the females
and 40% of the males of the same group are disagreed with the statement. It indicates that the learners of this group either do not understand
direct and indirect object in English or they are undecided on the statement. 100% of the male respondents and 50% of the female respondents of
group nine are neutral, 40% of them are disagreed and only 10% of them are on the statement. It means the male learners of this group are totally
undecided on the statement whereas the females of this group fluctuate between ‘disagree’ and ‘neutral ‘ category. 50% of the male respondents
of group ten are agreed with the statement whereas 50% of them are neutral on the statement. It means only half of the male learners of this
group understand direct and indirect object in English. In case of the female learners, 60% of them are agreed on the statement and 30% of them
are neutral. It means the majority of the female learners of this group understand direct and indirect object in English. The respondents of group
eleven reflect a different image. 80% of the male respondents of this group are neutral whereas 20% of them are disagreed on the statement. It
indicates that the learners of this group are not able to decide whether the learning of direct and indirect object in English is easy or difficult. 90% of
the female respondents of the same group are agreed on the statement. It shows that these learners easily understand direct and indirect object in
English. In group twelve also, 90% of the female learners are agreed with the statement and 40% of the male respondents of the same group are
neutral but 30% of them are agreed as well as disagreed on the same statement. It shows that the females of this group are better equipped with
the knowledge of direct and indirect object than the male learners of the same group. If we look at data in table…. and table……….which is
irrespective of gender, one can say that the learners are divided into two parts. There is one part of the learners whose responses are fluctuating
between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category whereas the responses of the part two learners are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category.
The overall responses also show that the responses of B.Sc., B.Com. and B.A.(H) are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category whereas the
responses of B.A.(P) is fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. So one can say that B.A.(P) group of learners feel more difficult to
learn direct and indirect object in English in comparison with the learners of B.Sc., B.Com. and B.A.(H) groups.
9. Sub. Verb Inversion in English is easy to understand.
Level Gender Count Minimum Maximum Mean
Standard
Deviation Level Gender Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
B.Sc.-I Male 10 3 4 3.5 0.527046 B.Sc.-I Male 10 0 0 5 5 0
Irrespective of Year (Level) Irrespective of Year (Level)
Level Count Minimum Maximum Mean Standard
Deviation Level Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
.Sc. 60 B1 4
3.100001 0.837693
B.Sc. 60 2 12 24 22 0
100% 3.33% 20% 40% 36.66%
B.Com. 601 4
2.783334 0.761188
B.Com. 60 4 13 35 8 0
100% 6.66% 21.66% 58.33% 13.33%
B.A. (P) 603 4
3.616667 0.490314
B.A. (P) 60 0 0 23 37 0
100% 38.33% 61.66%
B.A. (H) 601 4
2.750001 1.018915
B.A.(H) 60 9 13 22 16 0
100% 15% 21.66% 36.66% 26.66%
The mean scores of group one, two and three on the statement of SAI rule in English are totally different. The response of the male respondents of
group one is fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category whereas the responses of the females of the same group is fluctuating between
‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category as their mean scores are 3.5 and 2.5. In term of %, 50% of the male respondents are neutral and 50% of them feel
difficult to learn SAI rules in English. 50% of the female respondents of the same group are agreed with the statement but 50% of them are
undecided on the statement. With the mean scores of 3.8 and 3.1, the responses of the male and the female respondents of group two are
fluctuating among ‘agree’, ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. 50% of the male respondents are disagreed and 20% of them are undecided on thestatement. It means the learning of SAI rules in English has become more difficult even in their second year. Only 30% of the females of this group
understand this rule whereas 50% of them face difficulties in learning of this SAI rule and 20% of them are not able to decide whether the learning
of SAI rule in English is easy or difficult. The third group of learners whose mean scores are 2.7 and 3, only the male respondents of this group show
a slight increase in learning of SAI rules in English as 40% of them are agreed with the statement but 50% of them are still undecided on the
statement. 100% of the female learners of group four are neutral on the statement. It means this group of learners does not yet know what SAI
rule is in English. 70% male respondents of the same group are neutral on the statement and 30% of them feel difficult to learn this rule as their
mean scores are clustered to ‘neutral’ category. The mean scores of group five show a different image (i.e. 2.7 for the males and 2.1 for the
females). In term of %, 50% of the males and 70% of the female learners of group five are agreed with the statement. It means the females of this
group understand SAI rules. Though the mean scores of the male learners of group five and six in the second year of the course remain the same
i.e. 2.7 but in term of %, only 30% of them agree with the statement in their third year of the program. The same status is for the female learners as
their % of attitude towards the statement in the second year of the program has gone down. As far as the responses of the males and the females
of group seven, eight and nine are concerned, they are fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘ disagree’ category as their mean scores are within the
range of 3 to 4. 70% of the male respondents of group seven and 80% of the female respondents of the same group are disagreed with the
statement. It means these learners face problems while they are learning SAI rule in English. 60% of the male respondents of group eight are
neutral on the statement whereas 40% of them feel difficult to learn this rule. 100% of the female respondents of the group do face difficulties in
learning of SAI rule. 100% of the male respondents of group nine are undecided but only 20% of the female respondents in the same group are
undecided on the statement. One can say that these groups of learners either do not understand SAI rule in English or feel difficult to learn it. A
Irrespective of Year (Level) Irrespective of Year (Level)
Level Count Minimum Maximum Mean Standard
Deviation Level Count
Strongly
Agree
(1)
Agree
(2)
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(4)
Strongly
Disagree
(5)
B.Sc. 601 4
3.283334 0.64024
B.Sc. 60 1 3 34 22 0
100% 1.66% 5% 56.66% 36.66%
B.Com. 601 4
2.616667 0.922284
B.Com. 60 7 20 22 11 0
100% 11.66% 33.33% 36.66% 18.33%
B.A. (P) 602 4
3.633334 0.551335
B.A. (P) 60 0 2 18 40 0
100% 3.33% 30% 66.66%
B.A. (H) 601 4
2.716667 0.865394
B.A.(H) 60 4 21 23 12 0
100% 6.66% 35% 38.33% 20%
The mean scores of the learners of group one, two and three are 3.1, 2.8, 3.9, 3.5, 2.9 and 3.5. it indicates that the responses of the
males and the females of group one is clustered to ‘neutral’ category. In term of %, 90% of the males and 70% of the female
respondents are neutral on the statement. It means the learners of this group are not yet decided whether the learning of wh-move in
English is easy or difficult. 90% of the male and 50% of the female respondents of group two are disagreed with the statement. It
means the male learners of this group and half of the female learners of the same group express difficulty in learning of wh-move in
English but 50% of the female learners of this group are still neutral on the statement. 90% of the male and 30% of the female
respondents of group three are neutral on the statement whereas 60% of the female learners are disagreed on the statement. It means
the male learners of group three in spite of perusal of three years of their English program do not understand wh- move in English. The
mean scores of group four, five and six show a different image. The responses of the male learners of group four are clustered to
‘disagree’ category whereas the responses of the female learners are clustered to ‘neutral’category. In term of %, 80% of the males aredisagreed on the statement and 90% of the females are neutral on the statement. It shows that the male learners of this group express
difficulty in learning of wh-move in English but the females are undecided. As the mean scores of the male and the females of group
five are the same i.e. 2 and 2, 80% of the males and the same % of the females are agreed with the statement. One can say the learners
of this group have improved the knowledge of wh-move in English during their second year of the program but they have not
maintained this growth in their third year as the mean scores of the males and the females are 2.2 and 2.8. In term of %, only 70% of
the males and 30% of the females of group six are agreed with the statement. The mean scores of seven, eight and nine are 3.8, 4, 3.6,
4, 2.8 and 3.6. The responses of these learners are fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. As 80% of the male
respondents and 100% of the female respondents of group seven are disagreed on the statement. One can say that the learners of
these groups feel difficult in learning of wh-move in English. 100% of the female and 60% of the male respondents of eight group are
disagreed on the statement. It means all of the male learners of and 60% of the female of this group express difficulty in learning of wh-
move in English. 80% of the males of group nine are neutral on the statement. It means the learners of this group are undecided
whether the learning of wh-move in English is easy or difficult. 60% of the females are disagreed on the statement whereas 40% of
them of group nine are neutral on the statement. It means the majority of the female learners of group nine face dif ficulties in learning
of wh-move in English. The mean scores of group ten, eleven and twelve are 2.7, 2.4, 3.3, 2.4, 3.3 and 2.2. The responses of group ten
are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. In term of %, only 20% of the male learners are agreed with the statement
whereas 70% of them are neutral on the statement but 70% of the female learners of the same group are agreed with the statement. It
means the females of this group easily understand wh-move in English whereas the males are undecided. The mean scores of the male
learners of group eleven and twelve are equal i.e. 3.3. In term of % also only 10% of them are agreed that they understand wh-move in
English whereas 50% of them are neutral and 40% of them express difficulties in learning of wh-move in English. 60% and 80% of the
female respondents of group eleven and group twelve are agreed with the statement. One can say that the females of these groups do
better in learning of wh-move in English in comparison with the male learners in their final year of the program.
Table…and Table…. which are irrespective of gender, one can find that the responses of all the learners are fluctuating between
‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category except the responses of the learners of group five, six and ten whose responses are fluctuating
between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. In term of %, 80% of group one , 60% of group two, 55% of group three, 20% of group eight,
60% of group nine and 45% of group eleven are neutral whereas 70% of group two, 40% of group four, 90% of group seven and 80% of
group eight are disagree with the statement. The data show that except the learners of group five, six and ten all the other learners are
either not able to decide whether the learning of wh-move in English is easy or difficult or even they express difficulties in learning of
wh- move in English.
Overall performance of these learners show that 3% of the learners of B.A.(P), 6% of the learners of B.Sc. and 41% of the learners of
B.Com. and B.A.(H) understand wh-move in English. One can say that the learning of wh-move in English has proved difficult for the
learners of these groups.
Statistics of Teachers' Attitude towards English Program in DU
Teachers’ questionnaires
As indicated in chapter three, the purpose of this questionnaire is to procure some data regarding the efficiency of the English program and how much
emphasis is given to the learning and teaching of the English program. Items 1 to 3 are therefore meant to glean data pertaining to existing English program
and its effect on the learners. Items 4 and 5 on the other hand focus on use of dictionary. Item 6 is pertaining to teaching methodology whereas items 7
and 8 are pertaining to learners’ motivation towards the program. Item 9 is pertaining to the time consumed in learning and teaching of English program
and the last item puts focus on pedagogical context. The answers provided by the teachers to each item have been statistically arranged against their
responses. Moreover the analysis employs Karl Pearson’s Statistical formulae for Mean and Standard Deviation to reach the highest accuracy of the attitude.
1. The present English program is adequate to increase learners' competence in 2nd lg.
Table………..and figure……….. above clearly show that the mean responses of the teachers are clustering to ‘agree’ category in term of percentages, 70% of
the respondents are of the view that the present English program is adequate to increase learners’ communicative competence. It means the majority of
the teachers understand that the English program is suited to increase learners’ competence in their second language. It is, however, shown in the above
table and the figure that 23% of them are neutral and 7% of them are disagree with the statement. One can assume that teachers giving such a response
may not be fully aware of the effect of the program.
2. The program is mainly focused on learners' communicative competence.
The mean response of the teachers on the aforesaid statement is clustered to ‘neutral’ category. To be specific, the bar graph quite explicitly demonstrate
that 83% of the teachers are neutral on the statement. The view of the teachers on this statement is not yet decided. It indicates that the surveyed on this
statement not able to decide whether the present program is based on the learners’ communicative competence or not. Only 10% of the teachers are
agreed with the statement whereas7% of them are disagreed. It indicates that the teachers are absolutely undecided whether the program focus on
learners’ communicative competence or not.
3.The material used in the present program is best suited for the learners' need.
On the statement of the suitability of the teaching material as well as the fulfillment of the need of the learners, only 10% of the surveyed teachers are
agreed with the statement. As the mean scores of the teachers on this statement are 3.4. In term of %, 57% of the teachers’ response are clustered to
‘neutral’ category whereas 33% of them are disagreed on the statement. The bar graph too quite explicitly demonstrate that the view of the surveyed
teachers are fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category. It shows that the majority of the teachers are undecided on the statement.
4. We encourage the learners to use bilingual dictionary
As far as the use of bilingual dictionary is concerned, 63% of the respondents are neutral on the above statement and this is also illustrated by the bar graph
above. It is also obvious that only 17% of them agree that the teachers encourage the learners to use the bilingual dictionary in the English program. It
indicates that these teachers might have felt that L2 learning can be made easy with the help of referring back to L1 as the learners generally do. But 20% of
them are disagreed with the statement and the mean score of the surveyed teachers on this statement is 3.03.It indicates that the teachers’ responses are
clustered to ‘neutral’ category. In fact this shows that teachers are not sure whether the use of bilingual dictionary in this program would increase the
60% of the respondents agree that the learners in question are encouraged to use monolingual dictionary while they are pursuing their undergraduate
courses. The mean score (2.5) on this statement also indicates that the most of the responses of the surveyed is clustered to ‘agree’ category. Only 30% of
them, however, are neutral and the other 10% disagree with this statement. Those who are ‘neutral’ or ‘disagree’ on the statement might be convinced
that these learners always fall back on their mother tongue whenever they feel difficulties in learning of English.
5.We encourage the learners to use monolingual dictionary
6. The teaching methods used for the present program increase learners' competence
Table
Total Minimum Maximum Mean S. Devn.
30 2 4 2.73 0.58
Table
Frequency
Percentage
(%) Cumulative Percent.(%)
Strongly agree (1)
Agree (2) 10 33.33 33.33
Neutral (3) 18 60 93.33
Disagree (4) 2 6.66 100
Strongly disagree(5)
Total 30 100
Figure
On the statement of the teaching methods used to increase the learners competence, the teachers’ views are fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘agree’
category as the mean scores of the teachers on this statement is 2.73. In term of %, 60% of the teachers’ responses are clustered to ‘neutral’ category. Once
we look back on the statement no. two which is on learners’ communicative competence we find that the teachers’ view is the same. This neutral viewmight have stemmed from the fact that the learning competence of the students are linguistically weak and thus they are unable to cope up with the
present program because only 30% 0f the teachers are agreed with the statement and 7% of them are disagreed with the statement.
Regarding the learners’ proficiency in English, only 47% of the teachers are agreed with statement. It indicates that the surveyed teachers feel that the
learners’ knowledge of English is not good enough to handle the teaching materials prescribed for them. The mean scores of the teachers on this statement
is 2.67. It indicates that their responses are fluctuating between ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ category. 37% of the respondents are neutral and 10% of them
disagree with the statement given above. This neutral view and disagreement might have come out due to the fact that these teachers feel that the
learners linguistically weak in and unable to cope up the prescribed materials and tasks.
7. The students' proficiency in English is good enough to receive the prescribed materials.
As far as the learners’ motivation is concerned, only 17% of the respondents agree with the statement this is also explicitly illustrated by the above bar
graph. It is also obvious that 40% of the respondents are neutral and 43% of them are disagreed with the statement. In fact the mean score of the teachers
on this statement is clustering towards ‘neutral’ category. It clearly indicates that the teachers seem to be quite unsure whether the learners are motivated
to compose in English or not.
8. The students are highly motivated to compose in English
Apparently the majority of the teachers’ responses are fluctuating between ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ category as the mean score of the teachers on this
statement is 3.26. only10% of the surveyed teachers is agreed upon this statement. The neutral view and the disagreement on this statement seem to
reflect that the time used for teaching may not be adequate. As the mean score of the teachers on this statement is 3.26, one can also say that the teachers
are unsure whether the time used for teaching English is adequate or not.
9.The time used for teaching English to the learners' is adequate
The above table and figure throws a light on the learners’ educational background right from class Xth. to undergraduate level. The table and the figure
reveal that 53.3% of the learners of B.Sc. group have undergone their schooling in the private Institutions whereas 45% of them have studied in the
government institutions. As far as the learners of B.Com. group are concerned, 56.6% of them have undergone their schooling in the private Institutions and
43.3% of them have studied in the government institutions. In case of the learners of B.A.(P), only 30% of them have studied in private institutions and the
rest of them i.e.73.3% have studied in government schools. 46.6% learners of B.A.(H) group have studied in private schools whereas 60% of them have
studied in government schools. One may point out the maximum % of the learners who have studied in government schools is 73.3% of B.A.(P) group and
also 47% learners of these groups are having less than Rs.20,000/m that is the maximum % in the low income group. The rest of the groups do not
significantly reflect correlation with parental income.
The above mentioned table and the figure show that 75% to 95% of the learners had English as medium of their education up to class xii except the learners
of B.A.(P) groups because 80% of these learners had Hindi as their medium of instruction and 5% of these learners had other than English and Hindi as their
medium of instruction up to class xii. Data also reveals that 55% to 68% of the learners of other than B.A.(P) groups had Hindi as their medium of
instruction. It is interesting to note that 95% of the learners who are of B.Sc. group have English and Hindi both as their medium of instruction at UG level
whereas 95% and 98.3% of the learners of B.com. and B.Sc. group respectively had English as their medium of instruction at UG level but 71.6 % of the
learners of B.A(P) group had Hindi as their medium of instruction. One may point out that B.A.(P) group of learners produced maximum no. of word order
errors and it may be due to Hindi medium instruction the learners pursued at UG level.
The above table and the figure reveal the languages known to the learners in their receptive and productive skills. The % in the table reflects only Hindi
and English languages known to the learners and the details of other than Hindi and English languages are in Annexture- three of appendices. The data
shows that 91 to 95% of the learners are well competent in Hindi and English at reading and writing skills whereas 73.3 to 88.2% of them are well
competent in Hindi and English at speaking and listening skills. Thus one can say that 73 to 95 % of these learners are well competent in Hindi and English
languages.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Count 60 60 60 60
Level B.Sc. B.Com. B.A. (P) B.A.
(H)
Reading HINDI(H);
ENGLISH(E), URDU(U) &
PUNJABI(P)
WritIng HINDI(H);
ENGLISH(E), URDU(U) &
PUNJABI(P)
Speaking HINDI(H);
ENGLISH(E), URDU(U) &
PUNJABI(P)
Listening HINDI(H);
ENGLISH(E), URDU(U) &
PUNJABI(P)
Reading WritIng Speaking Listening
H
I N D I ( H ) ; E N G L I S H ( E ) , U R D U ( U ) &
P U N J A B I ( P )
H
I N D I ( H ) ; E N G L I S H ( E ) , U R D U ( U ) &
P U N J A B I ( P )
H
I N D I ( H ) ; E N G L I S H ( E ) , U R D U ( U ) &
P U N J A B I ( P )
H
I N D I ( H ) ; E N G L I S H ( E ) , U R D U ( U ) &
The above table and the figure show domains of use of English skills in the aforesaid activities. In case of reading skill, 23 to 42% of the learners use English
in entertainment reading, 57 to 90% of the learners use this language while reading literature,10 to 28% of them use English while interacting with family,
60 to 80% of them use English in educational instruction whereas 15 to 33% of them use English during socio-cultural activities. Data shows that 57 to 90%
of the learners use English language while reading literature.
In case of writing skill, 25 to 43% of the learners use English in entertainment writing, 53 to 81% of the learners use this language while writing literature. 10
to 38% of them use English while writing to their family members, 40 to 82% of whereas 23 to 45% of them use English writing during socio-cultural
activities. Data shows that 40 to 82% of them use English writing in educational instruction and 53 to 81% of the learners use this language while writing
literature.
In case of listening skill, 46 to 87% of the learners listen to English in entertainment, 32 to 72% of the learners listen to the literature program in English
language, 18 to 57% of them use English while listening to the family members, 52 to 83% of them listen in English in educational instruction whereas 16 to
42% of them listen in English language during socio-cultural activities. Data shows that the majority of the learners listen in English during educational
instruction and literature program.
In case of speaking skill, 13 to 38% of the learners speak English during entertainment , 28 to 58% of the learners speak this language during literary
activities ,23 to 62% of them use English while interacting with family, 40 to 72% of them use English in educational instruction whereas 18 to 45% of themuse English during socio-cultural activities. Data shows that the majority of the learners speak English during educational instruction.
The aforementioned table and the figure show that 98% of the learners do not take any extra course in English but only 10% of the learners of B.A.(P) group
take extra course in English. This shows that the majority of the learners do not feel any difficulty during acquisition of the prescribed English course.
8. How many hours of English instruction/week do you take?
On the question of hours of English instruction/week, the different groups of learners have responded differently. 62% learners of B.Sc. group agree upon
less than 6 hours whereas 28% of them say 6 to 8 hours but only 1.6 to 3% of them have agreed on 8 to 10 and more than 10 hrs. Data indicates that these
groups of learners undergo English instruction for 6 hrs. 56.6% learners of B.Com. group agree upon less than 6 hours whereas 38.3% of them say 6 to 8
hours but only 1.6 to 3.3% of them have agreed on 8 to 10 and more than 10 hrs. Data indicates that these groups of learners undergo English instruction
for 6 to 8 hrs. 70% learners of B.A.(P) have responded on less than 6 hrs. and only1.6% of them responded on 8 to 10 and more than 10 hrs. So, one can
explicitly say that these groups of learners do not take more than 6 hrs of English instruction. B.A.(H) groups of learners provide a different pictures, 50% of
these learners agree on 6 to 8 hrs. whereas 41% of them claim to take more than 10 hrs. of English instruction. One can assume that the learners of these
groups might have taken extra English instructions or might have wrongly understood the question.
the responses of B.A.(H) group of learners are unique and one can assume that the learners of these groups might have undergone more than 10 hrs. of
English medium instructions because these learners have no option other than English medium.
10. What activities does your prescribed English course consist of ?
The table and the figure provide the information about different kinds of activities English language/literature consist of. 77% to 83% of the learners put
focus on English language except the learners of B.A.(H) groups. 70% of the learners of B.A.(H) group respond in favor of English literature. In fact they have
responded as expected because only B.A.(H) group of learners offer English literature whereas the rest of the group offer English languages. In case of oral
communication activities, only 32% to 58% of the learners agree. On paragraph and essay activities, 40% to 60 % of the learners agree and 40% to 52% of
the learners agree on the debate and discussion activities. It indicates that the aforesaid activities are part of the syllabi but it is also clear through the
above table and figure that these aforesaid activities are not attended by all the learners.
11. What kinds of learning/ teaching/materials/aids are used in your English course?
The above table and figure reflects the responses of the learners on the question “What kinds of learning/ teaching/materials/aids are used in your English
course?” 85% to 100% of the learners of all the groups agree with text book/readings, 65% to 92% of them agree with English grammar and composition.
On the question of charts/slides, only 18% to 28% of the learners agree. In case of the use of audio & visual materials, only 8% to15% of the learners show
their consent but on the same question, 40% of the learners of B.A.(H) group show their consent. It indicates that these groups i.e. B.A.(H) group of
learners avail this facility. On the question of native tutor, the learners have not understood the question in the spirit in which it was expected so they have
responded differently and their responses on this question proved insignificant. On the question of Language Lab, on line English program and others if any,only 1.6% to 5%of the learners from all the groups give consent. One can say that these learning and teaching aids are not executed under this program.
12. To what extend do your learning/teaching aids are useful?
The above table and figure records the responses of the learners on the question “To what extend do your learning/teaching aids are useful?” 62% to 77%
of the learners agree that this program help them to understand the structure of English language. 78% to 97% of the learners agree that the program help
them to improve the writing competence. 62% to 77% of the learners agree that the program help them to improve their communication skills. Only 10%
to 37% of the learners respond that the program help them to understand the global English and only 18% to 43% of the learners agree that the program
help them to improve their creativity. One can say that the learners are not satisfied with program on ‘To understand the global English’ and ‘To improve
the creativity’.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Count 60 60 60 60
Level B.Sc. B.Com. B.A. (P) B.A.
(H)
a.To understand the strctre of Eng.
Lg.
b. To improve writing Competion
c. To improve the ccommn. Skills
d. To understand the Global
English
e. To improve creativity
12.To whatextend do your
learning/teachg.
aids are useful?
a . T o u n d e r s t a n d t h e s t r u c t u
r e o f E n g . L g .
b . T o i m p r o v e w r i t i n g C o m p e t e n c e