Top Banner
Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin
51

Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Chapter 7

Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage

Pricing Theory

Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Page 2: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-2

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Equilibrium model that underlies all modern financial theory: What should be the “appropriate” level of return commensurate with a given amount of “risk” for an individual security

Derived using principles of diversification, with other simplifying assumptions

Page 3: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-3

Simplifying Assumptions•

Individual investors are price takers

Single-period investment horizon

Investments are limited to traded financial assets

No taxes and no transaction costs

Page 4: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-4

Simplifying Assumptions (cont.)

Information is costless and available to all investors

Investors are rational mean-variance optimizers

Homogeneous expectations

Page 5: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-5

Resulting Equilibrium Conditions

All investors will hold the same portfolio for risky assets; the “market portfolio” and CML

Market portfolio contains all securities and the proportion of each security is its market value as a percentage of total market value

Equilibrium security prices or “risk-appropriate” level of return is determined according to CAPM

Page 6: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-6

E(r)

rf

E(rM)M

CML

m

Capital Market Line

M = The value weighted “Market” Portfolio of all risky assets. Allinvestors will hold the same portfoliofor risky securities

Efficient Frontier

Page 7: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-7

M = rf =

E(rM) - rf =

Slope and Market Risk Premium

{Excess return on the

market portfolio

MME(rM) - rf = Optimal Market price of risk

= Slope of the CML

Market portfolioRisk free rate

E(rE(r))

E(rE(rMM))

rrff

MMCMLCML

mm

Capital Market Line

M = The value weighted M = The value weighted ““MarketMarket””Portfolio of all risky assets.Portfolio of all risky assets.

Page 8: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-8

Expected Return and Risk on Individual Securities

• The risk premium on individual securities is a function of the individual security’s __________________________________________

• What type of individual security risk will matter, systematic or unsystematic risk?

• An individual security’s total risk (2i) can be

partitioned into systematic and unsystematic risk:

2i =i

2 M2 + 2(ei)

M = market portfolio of all risky securities

contribution to the risk of THE market portfolio

Page 9: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-9

Expected Return and Risk on Individual Securities

• Individual security’s contribution to the risk of the market portfolio is a function of the __________ of the stock’s returns with the market portfolio’s returns and is measured by BETA

With respect to an individual security, systematic risk can be measured byi= [COV(ri,rM)] / 2

M

covariance

Page 10: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-10

E(r)E(r)

E(rE(rMM))

rrff

SMLSML

MMßßßß = 1.0= 1.0

Individual Stocks: Security Market LineSlope SML =

=

Equation of the SML (=CAPM)

E(ri) = rf + [E(rM) - rf]

[E(rM) – rf ]

price of risk for market

Page 11: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-11

Sample Calculations for SML

E(rm) - rf = rf =

x = 1.25

E(rx) =

y = 0.6

E(ry) =

Equation of the SML

E(ri) = rf + [E(rM) - rf]i

0.03 + (0.08)*1.25 = 0.13 or 13%

0.03 + (0.08)*0.6 = 0.078 or 7.8%

If = 1?

If = 0?

0.08 0.03

Return per unit of systematic risk = 8% & the risk free return = 3%

Page 12: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-12

E(r)E(r)SMLSML

ßß

ßßMM

1.01.0

RRMM=11%=11%

3%3%

RRxx=13%=13%

ßßxx

1.251.25

RRyy=7.8%=7.8%

ßßyy

0.60.6

0.080.08

Graph of Sample Calculations

If the CAPM is correct, only β risk matters in determining the risk premium for a given slope of the SML.

Page 13: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-13

E(rE(r))

15%15%

SMLSML

ßß1.01.0

RRmm=11%=11%

rrff=3%=3%

1.251.25

Disequilibrium Example

Suppose a security with a of ____ is offering an expected return of ____

According to the SML, the E(r) should be _____

1.2515%

13%

Underpriced: It is offering a higher rate of return for its level of risk

The difference between the return required for the risk level as measured by the CAPM in this case and the actual return is called the stock’s _____ denoted by __

What is the __ in this case?

E(r) = 0.03 + 1.25(.08) = 13%

Is the security under or overpriced?

= +2% Positive is good, negative is bad

+ gives the buyer a + abnormal return

alpha

13%

Page 14: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-14

More on Alpha and Beta

E(rM) =

βS =

rf =

Required return = rf + [E(rM) – rf] βS

=

If you project that the stock will actually provide a return of ____, what is the implied alpha?

=

5 + [14 – 5]*1.5 = 18.5%

17%

17% - 18.5% = -1.5%

14%

1.5

5%

A stock with a negative alpha plots below the SML & gives the buyer a negative abnormal return

Page 15: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-15

Portfolio Betas

βP =

If you put half your money in a stock with a beta of ___ and ____ of your money in a stock with a beta of ___and the rest in T-bills, what is the portfolio beta?

βP = 0.50(1.5) + 0.30(0.9) + 0.20(0) = 1.02

1.530% 0.9

Wi βi

• All portfolio beta expected return combinations should also fall on the SML.

Page 16: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-16

Measuring Beta

• Concept:

• Method

Can calculate the Security Characteristic Line or SCL using historical time series excess returns of the security, and a proxy for the Market portfolio (DJI, S&P, etc).

We need to estimate the relationship between the security and the “Market” portfolio.

Page 17: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-17

Security Characteristic Line (SCL)Excess Returns (i)

..

..

........

.. ..

.. ....

.. ....

.. ..

.. ....

......

.. ..

.. ....

.. ....

.. ..

.. ....

.. ....

.. ..

..

.. ...... .... .... ..

Excess returnson market index

Ri = i + ßiRM + ei

Slope =

= What should equal?

SCLDispersion of the points around the line measures ______________.unsystematic risk

Page 18: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-18

GM Excess Returns May 00 to April 05

0.5858(Adjusted) = 33.18%

8.57%

-0.0143 1.276

0.01108 0.2318

“True” is between 0.81 and 1.74!

If rf = 5% and rm – rf = 6%, then we would predict GM’s return (rGM) to be

5% + (6%)*1.276 = 12.66%

7-18

Page 19: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-19

Adjusted Betas

Adjusted β =

=

=

2/3 (Calculated β) + 1/3 (1)

2/3 (1.276) + 1/3 (1)

1.184

Calculated betas are adjusted to account for the empirical finding that betas different from _ tend to move toward _ over time.

A firm with a beta __ will tend to have a ___________________ in the future. A firm with a beta ___ will tend to have a ____________________ in the future.

1 1

lower beta (closer to 1)>1< 1

higher beta (closer to 1)

Page 20: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-20

7.3 The CAPM and the Real World

Page 21: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-21

Evaluating the CAPM

• The CAPM is “false” based on the ____________________________.

The CAPM could still be a useful predictor of expected returns. That is an empirical question.

Huge measurability problems because the market portfolio is unobservable.

Conclusion: As a theory the CAPM is untestable.

validity of its assumptions

Page 22: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-22

Evaluating the CAPM

• However, the __________ of the CAPM is testable.

Betas are ___________ at predicting returns as other measurable factors may be.

• More advanced versions of the CAPM that do a better job at ___________________________ are useful at predicting stock returns.

practicality

not as useful

estimating the market portfolio

Still widely used and well understood.

Page 23: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-23

Evaluating the CAPM– The _________ we learn from the CAPM are still

entirely valid.• • •

principles

Investors should diversify.

Systematic risk is the risk that matters.

A well diversified risky portfolio can be suitable for a wide range of investors.

The risky portfolio would have to be adjusted for tax and liquidity differences.

Differences in risk tolerances can be handled by changing the asset allocation decisions in the complete portfolio.

Page 24: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-24

7.4 Multifactor Models and the CAPM

Page 25: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-25

Fama-French (FF) 3 Factor Model

Fama and French noted that stocks of ____________ and stocks of firms with a _________________ have had higher stock returns than predicted by single factor models.

Problem: Empirical model without a theory

high book to marketsmaller firms

Page 26: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-26

Fama-French (FF) 3 factor ModelFF proposed a 3 factor model of stock returns as follows:

• rM – rf = Market index excess return

• Ratio of ______________________________________ measured with a variable called ____:– HML:

High minus low or difference in returns between firms with a high versus a low book to market ratio.

• _______________ measured by the ____ variable– SMB:

Small minus big or the difference in returns between small and large firms.

book value of equity to market value of equityHML

Firm size variable SMB

Page 27: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-27

Fama-French (FF) 3 factor ModelrGM – rf =αGM + βM(rM – rf ) + βHMLrHML + βSMBrSMB + eGM

Page 28: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-28

Fama-French (FF) 3 factor ModelrGM – rf =αGM + βM(rM – rf ) + βHMLrHML + βSMBrSMB + eGM

0.6454

(Adjusted) = 38.52%

8.22%

-0.0262* 1.2029* 0.6923* 0.3646

0.0116 0.2411 0.2749 0.3327

Compared to single factor model:

Better Adjusted R2; lower βM higher E(r), but negative alpha.

If rf = 5%, rm – rf = 6%, & return on HML portfolio will be 5%, then we would predict GM’s return (rGM) to be

5% + -2.62% + 1.2029(6%) + 0.6923(5%) = 13.06%

Page 29: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-29

Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)• Arbitrage:

• Zero investment:

• Efficient markets:

Arises if an investor can construct a zero investment portfolio with a sure profit

Since no net investment outlay is required, an investor can create arbitrarily large positions to secure large levels of profit

With efficient markets, profitable arbitrage opportunities will quickly disappear

Page 30: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-30

Simple Arbitrage Example

Portfolio Cost Final Outcome

C 8 9(A+B) / 28 10

• •

If all of these stocks cost ___ today are there any arbitrage opportunities?

Short

Buy

The A&B combo dominates portfolio C, but costs the same.

Arbitrage opportunity: Buy A&B combo and short C, $0 net investment, sure gain of $1

The opportunity should not persist in competitive capital markets.

$8

Page 31: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-31

Arbitrage Pricing ExampleSuppose Rf = ___ and a well diversified portfolio P has a beta of ___ and an alpha of ___. Another well diversified portfolio Q has a beta of ___ and an alpha of ___.

If we construct a portfolio of P and Q with the following weights:

What should αp = 6%?

6% 1.31%

0.9 2%

WP = and WQ = ;

Then βp =

αp = 1.25% means an investor will earn rf 1.25% on portfolio PQ.

In theory one could short this portfolio and pay 1.25%, and invest in the riskless asset and earn 6%, netting the 4.75% difference.

Arbitrage should eliminate the portfolio alpha quickly.

(-2.25 x 1.3) + (3.25 x 0.9) = 0

(-2.25 x 1%) + (3.25 x 2%) = 1.25%

WP = - β Q / (β P - β Q)

WQ = β P / (β P - β Q)

WP = - β Q / (β P - β Q)

WQ = β P / (β P - β Q)

Note: Σ W = 1

-2.25 3.25

Page 32: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-32

Arbitrage Pricing ModelThe result: For a well diversified portfolio

Rp = βpRS (Excess returns)

(rp – rf) = βp(rS – rf)

and for an individual security

(ri – rf) = βi(rS – rf) + ei

Advantage of the APT over the CAPM:•

• –

No particular role for the “Market Portfolio,” which can’t be measured anyway

Easily extended to multiple systematic factors, for example

=> (ri – rf) = βp,1(r1,i – rf) + βp,2(r2,i – rf) + βp,3(r3,i – rf) + ei

RS is the excess return on a portfolio with a beta of 1 relative to systematic factor “S”

Page 33: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-33

APT and CAPM Cont.APT employs fewer restrictive assumptions

APT does NOT specify the systematic factors

Chen, Roll and Ross (1986) suggest:

Industrial production

Yield curve

Default spreads

Inflation

Page 34: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-34

Selected Problems

Page 35: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-35

Problem 1

– E(rX) =

X =

– E(rY) =

Y =

5% + 0.8(14% – 5%) = 12.2%

14% – 12.2% = 1.8%

5% + 1.5(14% – 5%) = 18.5%

17% – 18.5% = –1.5%

a. CAPM: E(ri) = 5% + β(14% -5%)

CAPM: E(ri) = rf + β(E(rM)-rf)

Page 36: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-36

Problem 1

b. Which stock?

i. Well diversified:Relevant Risk Measure?

Best Choice?

b. Which stock?

ii. Held alone:Relevant Risk Measure?

Best Choice?β: CAPM Model

Stock X with the positive alpha

Calculate Sharpe ratios

X = 1.8%

Y = -1.5%

Page 37: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-37

Problem 1

b. (continued) Sharpe Ratios

ii. Held Alone:Sharpe Ratio X =

Sharpe Ratio Y =

Sharpe Ratio Index =

(0.14 – 0.05)/0.36 = 0.25

(0.17 – 0.05)/0.25 = 0.48

(0.14 – 0.05)/0.15 = 0.60

Better

σ

rE(r)Ratio Sharpe f

Page 38: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-38

Problem 2

E(rP) = rf + [E(rM) – rf]

20% = 5% + (15% – 5%)

= 15/10 = 1.5

Page 39: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-39

Problem 3

E(rP) = rf + [E(rM) – rf]

E(rp) when double the beta:

If the stock pays a constant dividend in perpetuity, then we know from the original data that the dividend (D) must satisfy the equation for a perpetuity:

Price = Dividend / E(r)

$40 = Dividend / 0.13

At the new discount rate of 19%, the stock would be worth:

$5.20 / 0.19 = $27.37

13% = 7% + β(8%) or β = 0.75

E(rP) = 7% + 1.5(8%) or E(rP) = 19%

so the Dividend = $40 x 0.13 = $5.20

Page 40: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-40

Problem 4

a.

a.

b.

False. = 0 implies E(r) = rf , not zero.

Depends on what one means by ‘volatility.’ If one means the then this statement is false. Investors require a risk premium for bearing systematic (i.e., market or undiversifiable) risk.

False. You should invest 0.75 of your portfolio in the market portfolio, which has β = 1, and the remainder in T-bills. Then:

P = (0.75 x 1) + (0.25 x 0) = 0.75

Page 41: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-41

Problems 5 & 6

9.

10.

Not possible. Portfolio A has a higher beta than Portfolio B, but the expected return for Portfolio A is lower.

Possible. Portfolio A's lower expected rate of return can be paired with a higher standard deviation, as long as Portfolio A's beta is lower than that of Portfolio B.

Page 42: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-42

Problem 7

Calculate Sharpe ratios for both portfolios:

Not possible. The reward-to-variability ratio for Portfolio A is better than that of the market, which is not possible according to the CAPM, since the CAPM predicts that the market portfolio is the portfolio with the highest return per unit of risk.

0.5.12

.10.16Sharpe A

0.33

.24

.10.18SharpeM

σ

rE(r)Ratio Sharpe f

Page 43: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-43

Problem 8

Need to calculate Sharpe ratios?

Not possible. Portfolio A clearly dominates the market portfolio. It has a lower standard deviation with a higher expected return.

8.

Page 44: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-44

Problem 9

9.

Given the data, the SML is:

E(r) = 10% + (18% – 10%)

A portfolio with beta of 1.5 should have an expected return of:

E(r) = 10% + 1.5(18% – 10%) = 22%

Not Possible: The expected return for Portfolio A is 16% so that Portfolio A plots below the SML (i.e., has an = –6%), and hence is an overpriced portfolio. This is inconsistent with the CAPM.

Page 45: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-45

Problem 10

The SML is the same as in the prior problem. Here, the required expected return for Portfolio A is:

10% + (0.9 8%) = 17.2%

Not Possible: The required return is higher than 16%. Portfolio A is overpriced, with = –1.2%.

E(r) = 10% + (18% – 10%)

Page 46: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-46

Problem 11

Sharpe A =

Sharpe M =

Possible: Portfolio A's ratio of risk premium to standard deviation is less attractive than the market's. This situation is consistent with the CAPM. The market portfolio should provide the highest reward-to-variability ratio.

(16% - 10%) / 22% = .27

(18% - 10%) / 24% = .33

Page 47: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-47

Problem 12

Since the stock's beta is equal to 1.0, its expected rate of return should be equal to ______________________.

E(r) =

0.18 =

0

011

P

PPD

100

100P9 1 or P1 = $109

)r)β(E(rrP

PPD:mEquilibriu In fMf

0

011

the market return, or 18%

Page 48: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-48

Problem 13

a.

b.

r1 = 19%; r2 = 16%; 1 = 1.5; 2 = 1.0

We can’t tell which adviser did the better job selecting stocks because we can’t calculate either the alpha or the return per unit of risk.

r1 = 19%; r2 = 16%; 1 = 1.5; 2 = 1.0, rf = 6%; rM = 14%

1 =

2 =

The second adviser did the better job selecting stocks (bigger + alpha)

19% –

16% –

19% – 18% = 1%

16% – 14% = 2%

CAPM: ri = 6% + β(14%-6%)

[6% + 1.5(14% – 6%)] =

[6% + 1.0(14% – 6%)] =

Page 49: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-50

Problem 14

a.

b.

McKay should borrow funds and invest those funds proportionally in Murray’s existing portfolio (i.e., buy more risky assets on margin). In addition to increased expected return, the alternative portfolio on the capital market line (CML) will also have increased variability (risk), which is caused by the higher proportion of risky assets in the total portfolio.

McKay should substitute low beta stocks for high beta stocks in order to reduce the overall beta of York’s portfolio. Because York does not permit borrowing or lending, McKay cannot reduce risk by selling equities and using the proceeds to buy risk free assets (i.e., by lending part of the portfolio).

Page 50: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-51

Problem 15

i.

ii.

Since the beta for Portfolio F is zero, the expected return for Portfolio F equals the risk-free rate.

For Portfolio A, the ratio of risk premium to beta is:

The ratio for Portfolio E is:

Create Portfolio P by buying Portfolio E and shorting F in the proportions to give βp = βA = 1, the same beta as A. βp =Wi βi

1 = WE(βE) + (1-WE)(βF);

E(rp) =

WE = 1 / (2/3) or1.5(9) + -0.5(4) = 11.5%,

11.5% - 10% = 1.5%

(10% - 4%)/1 = 6%

(9% - 4%)/(2/3) = 7.5%

WE = 1.5 and WF = (1-WE) = -.5

p,-A =

Buying Portfolio P and shorting A creates an arbitrage opportunity since both have β = 1

Page 51: Chapter 7 Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

7-52

Problem 16

The revised estimate of the expected rate of return of the stock would be the old estimate plus the sum of the unexpected changes in the factors times the sensitivity coefficients, as follows:

Revised estimate = 14% +

E(IP) = 4% & E(IR) = 6%; E(rstock) = 14%

βIP = 1.0 & βIR = 0.4

Actual IP = 5%, so unexpected ΔIP = 1%

Actual IR = 7%, so unexpected ΔIR = 1%

E(rstock) + Δ due to unexpected Δ Factors[(1 1%) + (0.4 1%)] =15.4%