Bliss Industries., GIDC-Jhagadia Environmental Impact Assessment Report Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals Chapter-7: Additional Studies Page | 7.1 CHAPTER – 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES (RISK ASSESSMENT & SAFETY MANAGEMENT) 7.1. RISK ASSESSMENT & SAFETY MANAGEMENT Increasing use of hazardous chemicals as raw materials, intermediates and finished products has attracted attention of the Government and the public at large in view of the chemical disasters. The serious nature of the accidents, which cause damage to the plant, personnel and public, has compelled industries to pay maximum attention to the safety issues and also to effectively manage the hazardous material and operations. It is mandatory for the industries handling hazardous chemical to maintain specified safety standards and generate an on-site emergency plan and keep it linked with off site emergency plan. Risk assessment study for the proposed project of M/s. Bliss Industries has been carried out and the details are elaborated in this chapter. Based on findings and recommendations of RA report, management plan for the proposed project has also been prepared and included. Risk Assessment is defined as a continuous and integrated process of identification, evaluation and measurement of risks, along with their potential impact on the organization. The benefits of risk assessment include the following: Prevention or reduction in occurance of accidents. Mitigation of the severity and/or consequences by way of improved process techniques, fire protection systems, arrangements of storage, inventory monitoring to fit production requirements. Confidences develop in employees by improving competency. Preparedness and prompt response to deal with any accident. 7.2. OBJECTIVE AND METHODOLOGY OF RISK ASSESSMENT 7.2.1. Objective The principle objective of this study is to identify major risks in the manufacturing process and to evaluate on-site & off-site consequences of identified hazard scenarios. Pointers are then given for effective mitigation of hazards in terms of suggestions for
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Bliss Industries., GIDC-Jhagadia Environmental Impact Assessment Report Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies
Page | 7.22
� Nearest distance of human settlement at village Dadheda is 1.25 km from project
site. Hence, there will be no threat to nearby habitation from toxic, flammable and
explosive hazard.
7.7. RISK MITIGATIVE MEASURES
Risk is rated based on likelihood of various consequence. A risk matrix is prepared
based on findings of likelihood of an event with various consequences involved which is
given in Table 7.5.
Table 7.5: Risk matrix for emergency management
Risk Rating = Probability x Severity
Consequence / Severity
Insignificant / Negligible
Minor / Marginal Moderate Major /
Critical Severe /
Catastrophic 1 2 3 4 5
Likel
ihoo
d / P
roba
bilit
y Highly Unlikely 1 1 2 3 4 5
Unlikely 2 2 4 6 8 10
Somwhat Likely 3 3 6 9 12 15
Likely 4 4 8 12 16 20
Certain 5 5 10 15 20 25
Based on calculated risk rating, level of an emergency can be defined and in the event
of accident management can take necessary steps as per the standard operating
procedure. Details of level of emergency associated with above risk rating is given in
Table 7.6.
Bliss Industries., GIDC-Jhagadia Environmental Impact Assessment Report Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies Page | 7.23
Table 7.6: Levels of emergency associated with risk rating R
isk
Rat
ing
Ris
k A
ccep
tanc
e C
riter
ia
Emer
genc
y A
lert
Cod
e
Type of Emergency Management
1 - 4 Low I
Any incident which is Minor in nature. No potential risk of threatning lives or facitilites in the plant. i.e. Minor fires which can be extinguished easily.
Minor gas or toxic releases which can be isolated within short period of time, Minor spillage of hazardous materials which can be contained by dike or absorbant materials
On-site impact. Within the capability of Unit at Plant Level and can be managed with routin procedure.
5-12 Medium II
Any incident which is Major / Serious in nature. Potential risk of threatening lives, facilities or buildings on-site or off-site. i.e. Fire involving flammable storage tanks or plant equipments, Gas or toxic releases of large quantity which can be isolated safely, Spillage of flammable or hazardous substances which requires substantial resouces for cleaning up or recovery.
On-site impact. Accetable risk within the capability of Unit with Management's review. SOP to be followed for mitigation of associated risk.
13-25 High III
Any incindent which is severe / catastrophic in nature which requires assistance from external emergency agencies i.e. Major or prolonged fire involving spread over entire plant or storage area;
Major or prolonged release of gas or toxic releases due to catastropic failure of process equipment or storage tanks which requires on-site evacuation.
Off-site impact. Off-site emergency plan to be followed.
Following precautionary mitigation measures associated with probable risk are
recommended for the proposed project.
A. Mitigation measures for leakage of Chlorine Gas � Ammonia water torches will be provided to detect chlorine leakages, as chlorine gas
reacts with aqueous ammonia to form white fumes of ammonium chloride.
� Automated chemical leak detection comprising of leak detector, audio- visual
emergency system and acutate ventilation fans will be installed at chlorine storage
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies
Page | 7.26
Table 7.7: Possible Emergency - Spillage in chemical storage area (Spill Control Plan)
Location Scenario
considered Action by
Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
Chemical Storage area
Small spillage
Toxic vapour Exposure to drum handling operators.
Drum puncher or damage, wrong Storage method.
� Find out drum leakage � Raise alarm immediately for warning
if large spillage observed. � Do not enter in confined room if
spillage is inside a confined room. � Do not touch any electrical switches
in spillage area. � Stop all hot work in this area. � Call fire and Safety department. � Cordon the area. � Evacuate non-essential persons from
the affected area immediately. � Inform the area in-charge. � Try to control situation at department
level with available resources with full PPEs.
� Identify the spillage material and refer MSDS for control plan.
� Segregate leakage drum from the area.
� Inform the Site Main Controller (SMC) in detail.
� Open all doors and windows in this area.
� Take decision to declare onsite emergency.
� Spill control and neutralization team member try to control spread material in more area by absorbing material and dry sand.
� If material is toxic or any other flammable and toxic chemical, special
� SOP for handling will be displayed in local language for safe operating procedure.
� FLP type light fittings shall be provided.
� Proper ventilation shall be made available in Drum storage area.
� Proper label and identification board stickers shall be provided in the storage area.
� Proper inventory of hazardous chemicals should be maintained and buffer stock should be kept as minimum as possible.
� Conductive drum pallets shall be provided.
� Drum handling trolley / stackers/fork lift shall be used for drum handling.
� Materials shall be stored as per its Compatibility study and separate area shall be made available for flammable, corrosive and toxic chemical drums storage.
� Dyke wall will be provided to area where hazardous chemicals will be stored.
� Smoking and other spark, flame generating items shall be banned from the entry Gate.
� NFPA & GHS labels shall be provided on drums for hazard identification of the chemicals.
Large spillage
Fire in case of ignition source available within LEL-UEL % concentration
Bliss Industries., GIDC-Jhagadia Environmental Impact Assessment Report Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies Page | 7.27
Location Scenario
considered Action by
Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
precautions needs to be taken as per chemical expert Key person guide line.
� Do not spray water or Foam on spilled material.
� Do not drain spilled material in any trench.
� Collect the spilled material in close container and send to ETP for further neutralization of the residual contents.
� Administer first aid to the victim. � Make arrangement to send injured
person/s to Hospital. � If off site emergency situation occurs,
inform to following agencies Request for Mutual aiders, local authorities like DISH office, Collectorate office, Disaster management cell, Police, fire brigade, nearby hospital, local GPCB office
� Exhaust shall be provided at ground level in drum storage area.
� Drum loading unloading procedures are prepared and implemented.
� Liquid chemicals will be transferred by mechanical seal pump through closed pipeline.
Table 7.8: Possible Emergency - Fire in chemical storage area
Location Scenario
considered Action by
Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
Chemical Storage area
Small spillage
Fire in drum storage area
Drum leakage or damage, Improper storage Method.
� Raise fire siren or shout Fire…Fire….Fire…
� Evacuate the area immediately. � Inform the area incharge. � Inform Incident Controller in detail. � Call fire department immediately and
help them in fire fighting.
� SOP for handling will be displayed in local language for safe operating procedure.
� FLP type light fittings shall be provided.
� Proper ventilation shall be made available in Drum storage area.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies
Page | 7.28
Location Scenario
considered Action by
Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
Ignition source like electrical source, Friction etc. BLEVE due to overpressure in drum
� Try to control situation at department level with available respiratory and non- respiratory PPEs.
� If it is found uncontrollable condition by department level inform Site Main Controller for onsite emergency situation.
� Declare on site emergency if required.
� Remove unburned drums from the site if possible without any risk.
� Start fire hydrant system or water hose rill and spray water on uninvolved drums in fire for cooling purpose.
� Use foam fire extinguishers for firefighting of solvent fire.
� Do not enter in fire prone area. � If fire found uncontrollable condition
call fire brigade and mutual aider for help.
� In case of BLEVE fire, immediate evacuate the area up to 50 meters of the area surrounding.
� All hazardous activates stop at site. � Inform nearby company to remove
hazardous material or inventory from the compound wall.
� Ensure search and rescue and causalities receive attention.
� Administer first aid to the victim. � Make arrangement to send injured
person/s to Hospital and inform victim’s family.
� Proper label and identification board stickers shall be provided in the storage area.
� Conductive drum pallets shall be provided.
� Drum handling trolley / stackers/fork lift shall be used for drum handling.
� Materials shall be stored as per its Compatibility study and separate area shall be made available for flammable, corrosive and toxic chemical drums storage.
� Smoking and other spark, flame generating items shall be banned from the entry Gate.
� NFPA labels shall be provided on drums for hazard identification of the chemicals.
� Exhaust shall be provided at ground level in drum storage area.
� Drum loading unloading procedures are prepared and implemented.
Bliss Industries., GIDC-Jhagadia Environmental Impact Assessment Report Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies Page | 7.29
Location Scenario
considered Action by
Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
� If off site emergency situation occur –Inform to following agencies. Request for Mutual aiders, local authorities like – DISH office, Collectorate office, Disaster management cell, Police, fire brigade, nearby hospital, local GPCB office.
Table 7.9: Possible Emergency – Toxic Gas Release
Location Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
Chemical Storage area
Potential injury / fatality from large release
Toxic Gas Release Reactor / Heater Failure, Leakage in Process Line, Plugging of reactor outlet, leakage in pipeline
� Activate audio visual alarm � Evacuate the area immediately. � Inform the area incharge. � Inform Incident Controller in detail. � Call fire department immediately and
help them in fire fighting. � Try to control situation at department
level with available resources with full PPEs.
� If it is found uncontrollable condition by department level inform Site Main Controller for onsite emergency situation.
� Declare on site emergency if required.
� All hazardous activates stop at site. � Inform nearby company to remove
hazardous material or inventory from the compound wall.
� Provide accurate gas monitoring system on site.
� Minimize on-site storage � Develop procedure for tank
inspection and maintenance � Develop purge system to remove
gas to another tank. � Provide temperature control inside
reactor with authomatic shut-down of gas flow to the reactor.
� Design collection system to remove and purify/recycle or discard unreacted gas.
� Design control system to detect excess gases in exhaust and shut down gas flow.
� Provide control system to detect extreme temperature variations and activate backup cooling system.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies
Page | 7.30
Location Hazard Consequence
Possible Causes
Action to be taken Remedial measures to prevent recurrence of such incident
� Ensure search and rescue and causalities receive attention.
� Administer first aid to the victim. � Make arrangement to send injured
person/s to Hospital and inform victim’s family.
� If off site emergency situation occur –Inform to following agencies. Request for Mutual aiders, local authorities like – DISH office, Collectorate office, Disaster management cell, Police, fire brigade, nearby hospital, local GPCB office.
� Diver flow to temporary storage tank � Provide relief valve on reactor with
outlet to a temporary storage tank � SOP for handling will be displayed in
local language for safe operating procedure.
� Provide training to employees in the area.
Bliss Industries., GIDC-Jhagadia Environmental Impact Assessment Report Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies
Page | 7.31
F. Fire fighting System Adequate fire fighting system will be provided for proposed project as discussed below.
� Sufficient numbers of DCP Type (5.0 kg) fire extinguisher will be installed in the
Plant premises, Hazardous chemical storage, Utility, Admin building and CO2 (4.5
kg) type Fire Extinguisher will be installed in the Hazardous chemical storage &
Electrical area.
� Separate water storage tank of 30 KL will be provided with diesel driven pump and
Jockey Pump. Details of Fire water pump is given in Table 7.10.
Table 7.9: Details of fire-water pump
� Fire hydrant system with adequate numbers of hydrants will be installed at suitable
places of unit.
� Adequate numbers of smoke detector, flame detector, explosive gas detector, heat
detector and VOC detector with alarm. Automatic sprinkling system will also be
installed at various suitable locations and details for the same is given in following
Table 7.10.
Table 7.10: Details of provision for fire-fighting system.
Sr. No. Particular Location 1. Smoke Detector
Process Plant Hazardous chemical storage area Admin building
2. Flame Detector Hazardous chemical storage area
3. Explosive Gas Detector
Process Plant Hazardous chemical storage area
4. Heat Detector Hazardous chemical storage area
5. VOC Detector Process Plant Hazardous chemical storage area Hazardous waste storage area
6. Automatic Sprinkling Admin building, hazardous chemical storage area, Utility
Sr. No. Location Types Capacity Quantity
1 Fire Pumping area Jockey Pump 10 HP (20 m3/hr) 1
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Chapter-7: Additional Studies
Page | 7.40
Role of local authority Generally, the duty to prepare the off-site plan lies with the local authority. They may
have appointed an emergency planning officer (EPO) to prepare whole range of
different emergency within the local authority area.
Role of fire authority The control of a fire is normally the responsibility of the senior fire brigade officer who
would take over the handling of fire from the Incident Controller on arrival at the site.
Role of police The overall control of an emergency is normally assumed by the police with a senior
officer designated as emergency coordinating officer. Formal duties of the police during
emergency include protection of life and property and controlling traffic movements.
Role of health authorities Health authorities, including doctors, surgeons, hospitals, ambulances etc. have a vital
role to play following a major accident and they should form an integral part of the
emergency plan. Major off site incidents are likely to require medical equipments and
facilities in addition to those available locally.
Role of the “Mutual aid” agencies Some types of mutual aids are available from the surrounding factories, as per need, as
a part of the on site and off site emergency plan.
Role of the factory inspectorate In the event of an accident, the factory inspector will assist the District Emergency
Authority for information and help in getting mutual aid from surrounding factories.
Unit will maintain the records of details of emergency occur, corrective preventive
measures to be taken. Unit will display the details like list of assembly points, name of
the persons involve in the safety team like site controller, incident controller etc.
ANNEXURE 16 MAXIMUM CREDIBLE ACCIDENT
SCENARIOS
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
MAXIMUM CREDIBLE ACCIDENT SCENARIOS1. ACETIC ACIDSCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 1.Table 1: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Acetic Acid Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 2.03
Chemical storage HDPETank Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 5,000 Total Amount Released (kg) 69.4
Chemical Mass Stored (Kg) 5,174 Evaporating Puddle Diameter (m) 9.1
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 2.Table 2: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC, ppmModel Outcome
Distance(m) Remarks
Red [ERPG– 3] 250 <10 Maximum distance of toxic threat zone is 115 m from project sitewhich is confined within the industrial area. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.125 km
Orange [ERPG- 2] 35 39
Yellow [ERPG- 1] 5 115
� Flammable threat zone:Model outputs of the Flammable threat zone are given in Table 3.Table 3: Flammable area of vapor cloud
FlammableThreat Zone LOC, ppm Model Outcome
Distance (m) RemarksRed (60% LEL) 24,000 <10 Threat Zone was not drawn because
effect of near-field patchiness make the dispersion less reliable for short distances
Yellow (10% LEL) 4,000 <10
� Overpressure (Blast Force) threat zone:In case of chemical escape and ignited by spark or flame, no part of the vapor cloud will
be above the LEL (40,000 ppm) at any time. Thus, there will be no chance of
overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion.
A-109
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project site
for Model output for release are given in Table 4.Table 4: Estimated concentrations at point
Outdoor 0.278 0.546 There will be no significant overpressureIndoor 0.081 0.159
Toxic Threat at Point Flammable Threat at Point
SCENARIO-B: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM BURNING PUDDLE (POOL FIRE) This chemical is below its flash point and is unlikely to catch on fire.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 5: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 114 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 270 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 169
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 270
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.564 kW/m2.
A-111
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
2. ACETIC ANHYDRIDESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 6.
Table 6: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Acetic Anhydride
Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 1.28
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 1,000 Total Amount Released (kg) 42.6
Chemical Mass Stored (Kg) 1,066 Evaporating Puddle Diameter (m) 9.4
Outdoor 0.103 0.203 There will be no significant overpressureIndoor 0.0293 0.0576
Toxic Threat at Point Flammable Threat at Point
SCENARIO-B: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM BURNING PUDDLE (POOL FIRE)
This chemical is below its flash point and is unlikely to catch on fire.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 10: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq. m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 79 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 183 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 115
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 183
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.248 kW/m2.
A-115
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
3. ACETOPHENONESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 11.Table 11: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Aceto Phenone
Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (grams/min) 143
Chemical storage HDPEDrum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 2,000 Total Amount Released (kg) 4.56
Chemical Mass Stored (Kg) 2,035 Evaporating Puddle Diameter (m) 10
Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5
Opening from bottom of tank (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
b) Threat Zone� Toxic threat zoneModel outputs of the Toxic threat zone for are given in Table 12.
Outdoor 0.0097 0.0192 There will be no significant overpressure
Indoor 0.0027 0.0053
Toxic Threat at Point Flammable Threat at Point
SCENARIO-B: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM BURNING PUDDLE (POOL FIRE) This chemical is below its flash point and is unlikely to catch on fire.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 15: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq. m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 142 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 316 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 202
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 316
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.767 kW/m2.
A-119
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
4. CARBON DISULFIDESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 16.
Table 16: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Carbon Disulfide
Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 6.78
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 2,000 Total Amount Released (kg) 335
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 2,490 Evaporating Puddle
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 17Table 17: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 480 16 Maximum distance of toxic threat zone is 117 m from project site which is confined within industrial area. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange [AEGL - 2] 160 32
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 13 117
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 18.
A-121
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 19: Source Strength (Burning puddle – pool fire)
Details of Source Model OutcomeParticular Result
Name of Chemical Carbon Disulfide
Maximum Flame Length (m) 3.0
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Burn Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 2,000 Maximum Burn Rate (kg/min) 7.36
Chemical Mass Stored (Kg) 2,490 Total Amount Burned (kg) 423Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5 Burning Puddle Diameter
(m) 2
Opening from bottom of tank (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
b) Threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fireModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fire is given in Table 20.
Table 20: Thermal radiation from pool fire
Flammable Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq. m.
Model OutcomeDistance (m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 < 10.0 -
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 < 10.0 -
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 < 10.0 -
A-123
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
There is no significant thermal radiation at the point selected.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Acetone is given in Table 21.Table 21: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 95 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 222 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.15 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 139
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 222
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.375 kW/m2.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
5. CHLORINESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 22.
Table 22: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Chlorine Gas Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 7.63
Chemical storage Tonner Release Duration (min) 1
Storage Capacity (Liter) 900 Total Amount Released (gm) 458
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 3
Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5
Opening from bottom height (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
A-125
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 23Table 23: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 20 57 Maximum distance of toxic threat zone is 387 m from project site which is confined within industrial area. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange [AEGL - 2] 2 187
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 0.5 387
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 24.
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
6. ETHYLENE DICHLORIDESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 25.
Table 25: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Ethylene Dichloride
Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 5.8
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 500 Total Amount Released (kg) 239
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 618 Evaporating Puddle
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 26Table 26: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [ERPG – 3] 300 14 Toxic threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-fieldpatchiness made dispersion prediction less reliable for short distances.
Orange [ERPG - 2] 200 19
Yellow [ERPG - 1] 50 47
� Flammable threat zone:Model outputs of the Flammable threat zone for chemical release are given in Table 27.Table 27: Flammable area of vapor cloud
FlammableThreat Zone LOC, ppm
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) RemarksRed (60% LEL) 27000 <10.0 Threat Zone was not drawn because effect
of near-field patchiness make the dispersion less reliable for short distancesYellow
(10% LEL) 4500 <10.0
� Overpressure (Blast Force) threat zone:In case of chemical escaped and ignited by spark or flame, no part of the vapor cloud
will be above the LEL (45,000 ppm) at any time. Thus, there will be no chance of
overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion.
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 28.
A-129
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 29: Source Strength (Burning puddle – pool fire)
Details of Source Model OutcomeParticular Result
Name of Chemical Ethylene Dichloride
Maximum Flame Length (m) 3
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Burn Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 500 Maximum Burn Rate (kg/min) 7.34
Chemical Mass Stored (Kg) 618 Total Amount Burned (kg) 415Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5 Burning Puddle Diameter
(m) 2.3
Opening from bottom of tank (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
b) Threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fireModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fire is given in Table 30.
Table 30: Thermal radiation from pool fire
Flammable Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq. m.
Model OutcomeDistance (m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 < 10.0 -
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 < 10.0 -
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 < 10.0 -
A-131
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
There is no significant thermal radiation at point selected.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)c) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Ethylene Dichloride is given in Table 31.Table 31: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 53 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 127 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 79
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 127
d) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.117 kW/m2.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
7. HYDROCHLORIC ACIDSCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 32.
Table 32: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Hydrochloric Acid
Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (gm/min) 46
Chemical storage MS Tank Release Duration (min) 1
Storage Capacity (Liter) 20,000 Total Amount Released (gm) 737
Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5
Opening from bottom height (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
A-133
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 33Table 33: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 100 <10Maximum distance of toxic threat zone is 38 m from project site which is confined within the plant premise. Threat zone was not drawn because effect of near-field patchiness makes thedispersion less reliable for short distances
Orange [AEGL - 2] 22 11
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 1.8 38
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 34.Table 34: Estimated concentrations at point
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
8. METHANOLSCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 35.
Table 35: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Methanol Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 3.9
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 2,000 Lit Total Amount Released (kg) 159
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 1,566 Evaporating Puddle
Diameter (m) 7.8
Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5
Opening from bottom height (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
A-135
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 36.Table 36: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 7,200 <10 Toxic threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-fieldpatchiness made dispersion prediction less reliable for short distances.
Orange [AEGL - 2] 2,100 <10
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 530 13
� Flammable threat zone:Model outputs of the Flammable threat zone for chemical release are given in Table 37.Table 37: Flammable area of vapor cloud
FlammableThreat Zone LOC, ppm
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) RemarksRed (60% LEL) 43080 <10.0 Threat Zone was not drawn because effect
of near-field patchiness made thedispersion less reliable for short distancesYellow
(10% LEL) 7180 <10.0
� Overpressure (Blast Force) threat zone:In case of chemical escaped and ignited by spark or flame, no part of the vapor cloud
will be above the LEL (71,800 ppm) at any time. Thus, there will be no chance of
overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion.
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 38.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
Maximum effect of thermal radiation will be 0.388 kW/m2.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Acetone is given in Table 41.
Table 41: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 100
Maximum distance of thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 227 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearesthabitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 144
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 227
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.388 kW/m2.
A-139
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
9. BUTANOLSCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 42.
Table 42: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Butanol Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 1.43
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 2000 Total Amount Released (kg) 48.2
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 1596 Evaporating Puddle
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 43Table 43: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [PAC – 3] 8000 <10 Toxic threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-fieldpatchiness made dispersion prediction less reliable for short distances.
Orange [PAC - 2] 800 <10
Yellow [PAC - 1] 60 15
� Flammable threat zone:Model outputs of the Flammable threat zone for chemical release are given in Table 44.Table 44: Flammable area of vapor cloud
FlammableThreat Zone LOC, ppm
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) RemarksRed (60% LEL) 10,200 <10.0 Threat Zone was not drawn because effect
of near-field patchiness made thedispersion less reliable for short distancesYellow
(10% LEL) 1,700 <10.0
� Overpressure (Blast Force) threat zone:In case of chemical escaped and ignited by spark or flame, no part of the vapor cloud
will be above the LEL (17,000 ppm) at any time. Thus, there will be no chance of
overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion.
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 45.
A-141
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Outdoor 0.159 0.312 There will be no significant overpressure
Indoor 0.0456 0.0895
Toxic Threat at Point Flammable Threat at Point
SCENARIO-B: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM BURNING PUDDLE (POOL FIRE)
This chemical is below its flash point and is unlikely to catch on fire.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 46: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) RemarksRed (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.)
10.0 131 Maximum distance of thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 292m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.)
5.0 187
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.)
2.0 292
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.324 kW/m2.
A-143
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
10.ETHANOLSCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 47.
Table 47: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Ethanol Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 3.61
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 2000 Total Amount Released (kg) 141
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 1559 Evaporating Puddle
b) Threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fireModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fire is given in Table 52.
Table 52: Thermal radiation from pool fire
Flammable Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq. m.
Model OutcomeDistance (m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 < 10.0 -
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 < 10.0 -
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 < 10.0 -
A-147
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
There is no significant thermal radiation at the point selected.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Acetone is given in Table 53.Table 53: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 117 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 262 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 167
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 262
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.521 kW/m2.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
11.METHYLENE DICHLORIDESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 54.
Table 54: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Methylene Dichloride
Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 5.44
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 30
Storage Capacity (Liter) 100 Total Amount Released (kg) 131
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 131 Evaporating Puddle
Diameter (m) 3.4
Circular Opening Diameter (inch) 0.5
Opening from bottom height (m) 0
Internal Temperature (°C) 32
A-149
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 55.Table 55: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC, ppmModel Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 6900 <10 Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-fieldpatchiness made dispersion prediction less reliable for short distances.
Orange [AEGL - 2] 560 13
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 200 24
� Flammable threat zone:Model outputs of the Flammable threat zone for chemical release are given in Table 56.Table 56: Flammable area of vapor cloud
FlammableThreat Zone LOC, ppm
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) RemarksRed (60% LEL) 84,000 <10.0 Threat Zone was not drawn because effect
of near-field patchiness made thedispersion less reliable for short distancesYellow
(10% LEL) 14,000 <10.0
� Overpressure (Blast Force) threat zone:In case of chemical escaped and ignited by spark or flame, no part of the vapor cloud
will be above the LEL (1,40,000 ppm) at any time. Thus, there will be no chance of
overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion.
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 57.
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
There is no significant thermal radiation at the point selected.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)c) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Acetone is given in Table 60.Table 60: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 21 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 57 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 34
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 57
d) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.0226 kW/m2.
A-153
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
12.NITRIC ACIDSCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 61.
Table 61: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Nitric Acid Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (g/min) 3.94
Chemical storage MS Tank Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 5000 Total Amount Released (gm) 224
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 62Table 62: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 92 <10 Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-fieldpatchiness made dispersion prediction less reliable for short distances.
Orange [AEGL - 2] 24 <10
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 0.16 28
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. There is no significant concentration at point selected.
A-155
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
13.NITROBENZENESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 63.
Table 63: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Nitrobenzene Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (gm/min) 91.2
Chemical storage HDPE Tank Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 5,000 Total Amount Released (kg) 2.9
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 5,958 Evaporating Puddle
Outdoor 0.0061 0.012 There will be no significant overpressure
Indoor 0.00166 0.00326
Toxic Threat at Point Flammable Threat at Point
SCENARIO-B: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM BURNING PUDDLE (POOL FIRE)
This chemical is below its flash point and is unlikely to catch on fire.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
Table 67: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 169 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 382 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearesthabitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 243
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 382
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 1.14 kW/m2.
A-159
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
14.TOLUENESCENARIO-A: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO LEAKAGE AND FORM EVAPORATING PUDDLE (NOT BURNING)a) Source StrengthWhen chemical will escape from storage unit as a liquid and form an evaporating
puddle, source strength will be as given in the Table 68.
Table 68: Source Strength (Evaporating Puddle)
Details of SourceModel Outcome
Particular Result
Name of Chemical Toluene Maximum Avg. Sustained Release Rate (kg/min) 1.46
Chemical storage HDPE Drum Release Duration (min) 60
Storage Capacity (Liter) 100 Total Amount Released (kg) 75.6
Chemical Mass in the Tank (kg) 85.8 Evaporating Puddle
Proposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
b) Threat Zone
� Toxic threat zoneModel output of the Toxic threat zone is given in Table 69.Table 69: Toxic threat zone
Toxic Threat Zone LOC,ppm
Model Outcome
Distance (m) Remarks
Red [AEGL – 3] 3700 <10 Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-fieldpatchiness make dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
Orange [AEGL - 2] 560 <10
Yellow [AEGL - 1] 67 19
� Flammable threat zone:Model outputs of the Flammable threat zone for chemical release are given in Table 70.Table 70: Flammable area of vapor cloud
FlammableThreat Zone LOC, ppm
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) RemarksRed (60% LEL) 6600 <10.0 Threat Zone was not drawn because effect
of near-field patchiness made thedispersion less reliable for short distancesYellow
(10% LEL) 1100 <10.0
� Overpressure (Blast Force) threat zone:In case of chemical escaped and ignited by spark or flame, no part of the vapor cloud
will be above the LEL (11,000 ppm) at any time. Thus, there will be no chance of
overpressure (blast force) from vapor cloud explosion.
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 meter in downwind direction from project
site. Model output at a point in downwind direction for release are given in Table 71.
A-161
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
b) Threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fireModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation from pool fire is given in Table 73.
Table 73: Thermal radiation from pool fire
Flammable Threat Zone LOC,kW/sq. m.
Model OutcomeDistance (m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 < 10.0 -
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 < 10.0 -
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 < 10.0 -
A-163
Bliss Industries, GIDC-JhagadiaEnvironmental Impact Assessment ReportProposed Project for Manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals
Maximum Credible Accident Scenarios
c) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
There is no significant thermal radiation at the point selected.
SCENARIO-C: RELEASE OF CHEMICAL DUE TO CATASTROPHIC FAILURE (BLEVE)a) Threat Zone of thermal radiationModel output of the threat zone of thermal radiation due to catastrophic failure for
Acetone is given in Table 74.
Table 74: Threat zone of thermal radiation (BLEVE)
Threat ZoneLOC,
kW/sq.m.
Model OutcomeDistance
(m) Remarks
Red (Potentially Lethal within 60 sec.) 10.0 57 Maximum distance of
thermal radiation from catastrophic rupture is 170 m. Hence, it will not pose any threat to nearest habitation located at 1.25 km
Orange(2nd Degree burn within 60 sec.) 5.0 81
Yellow (Pain within 60 sec.) 2.0 127
b) Threat at pointEffect has been worked out at a point 500 m in downwind direction from project site.
The maximum thermal radiation estimated will be 0.114 kW/m2.