Chapter 6 Physical Database Design
Dec 17, 2015
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Physical Database Design
Physical Database Design
Physical DesignPhysical Design
The purpose of the physical design process is to translate the logical description of the data into technical specifications for storing and retrieving data
Goal: create a design that will provide adequate performance and insure database integrity, security, and recoverability
Decisions made in this phase have a major impact on data accessibility, response times, security, and user friendliness.
The purpose of the physical design process is to translate the logical description of the data into technical specifications for storing and retrieving data
Goal: create a design that will provide adequate performance and insure database integrity, security, and recoverability
Decisions made in this phase have a major impact on data accessibility, response times, security, and user friendliness.
Required InputsRequired Inputs Normalized relationsNormalized relations
Data volume and use estimatesData volume and use estimates
Attribute definitionsAttribute definitions
Descriptions of where and when data are usedDescriptions of where and when data are used
Expectations for response time, data security, Expectations for response time, data security, backup, recovery, retention, and integritybackup, recovery, retention, and integrity
Description of chosen technologyDescription of chosen technology
Normalized relationsNormalized relations
Data volume and use estimatesData volume and use estimates
Attribute definitionsAttribute definitions
Descriptions of where and when data are usedDescriptions of where and when data are used
Expectations for response time, data security, Expectations for response time, data security, backup, recovery, retention, and integritybackup, recovery, retention, and integrity
Description of chosen technologyDescription of chosen technology
Determining volume and usageDetermining volume and usage
Data volumeData volume statistics represent the size of statistics represent the size of the businessthe business
• calculated assuming business growth over a calculated assuming business growth over a period of several yearsperiod of several years
Usage Usage is estimated from the timing of is estimated from the timing of events, transaction volumes, and reporting events, transaction volumes, and reporting and query activity.and query activity.
• Less precise than volume statisticsLess precise than volume statistics
Data volumeData volume statistics represent the size of statistics represent the size of the businessthe business
• calculated assuming business growth over a calculated assuming business growth over a period of several yearsperiod of several years
Usage Usage is estimated from the timing of is estimated from the timing of events, transaction volumes, and reporting events, transaction volumes, and reporting and query activity.and query activity.
• Less precise than volume statisticsLess precise than volume statistics
Composite usage map (Pine Valley Furniture Company)
Composite usage map (Pine Valley Furniture Company)
Physical Design DecisionsPhysical Design Decisions Specify the Specify the data typedata type for each attribute from the logical data for each attribute from the logical data
modelmodel
• minimize storage space and maximize integrityminimize storage space and maximize integrity
Specify Specify physical recordsphysical records by grouping attributes from the logical by grouping attributes from the logical data model data model
Specify the Specify the file organizationfile organization technique to use for physical storage technique to use for physical storage of data recordsof data records
Specify Specify indexesindexes to optimize data retrieval to optimize data retrieval
Specify Specify query optimizationquery optimization strategies strategies
Specify the Specify the data typedata type for each attribute from the logical data for each attribute from the logical data modelmodel
• minimize storage space and maximize integrityminimize storage space and maximize integrity
Specify Specify physical recordsphysical records by grouping attributes from the logical by grouping attributes from the logical data model data model
Specify the Specify the file organizationfile organization technique to use for physical storage technique to use for physical storage of data recordsof data records
Specify Specify indexesindexes to optimize data retrieval to optimize data retrieval
Specify Specify query optimizationquery optimization strategies strategies
Data FormatData Format
Data type selection goalsData type selection goals
• minimize storageminimize storage
• represent all possible valuesrepresent all possible values
– eliminate illegal valueseliminate illegal values
• improve integrityimprove integrity
• support manipulationsupport manipulation
Note: these have different relative importanceNote: these have different relative importance
Data type selection goalsData type selection goals
• minimize storageminimize storage
• represent all possible valuesrepresent all possible values
– eliminate illegal valueseliminate illegal values
• improve integrityimprove integrity
• support manipulationsupport manipulation
Note: these have different relative importanceNote: these have different relative importance
Data format decisions (coding)Data format decisions (coding)
e.g., e.g., AHAH(Adams Hall), (Adams Hall), BB(Buchanan) , etc (Buchanan) , etc
implement by creating a look-up tableimplement by creating a look-up table
there is a trade-off in that you must create and store a there is a trade-off in that you must create and store a second table and you must access this table to look second table and you must access this table to look up the code valueup the code value
consider using when a field has a limited number of consider using when a field has a limited number of possible values, each of which occupies a relatively possible values, each of which occupies a relatively large amount of space, and the number of records is large amount of space, and the number of records is large and/or the number of record accesses is smalllarge and/or the number of record accesses is small
e.g., e.g., AHAH(Adams Hall), (Adams Hall), BB(Buchanan) , etc (Buchanan) , etc
implement by creating a look-up tableimplement by creating a look-up table
there is a trade-off in that you must create and store a there is a trade-off in that you must create and store a second table and you must access this table to look second table and you must access this table to look up the code valueup the code value
consider using when a field has a limited number of consider using when a field has a limited number of possible values, each of which occupies a relatively possible values, each of which occupies a relatively large amount of space, and the number of records is large amount of space, and the number of records is large and/or the number of record accesses is smalllarge and/or the number of record accesses is small
Example code-look-up table (Pine Valley Furniture Company)
Example code-look-up table (Pine Valley Furniture Company)
Data Format decisions (integrity)Data Format decisions (integrity)Data integrity controlsData integrity controls
• default valuedefault value
• Range controlRange control
• Null value controlNull value control
• Referential integrityReferential integrity
Missing dataMissing data
• substitute an estimatesubstitute an estimate
• report missing datareport missing data
• Sensitivity testingSensitivity testing
Data integrity controlsData integrity controls
• default valuedefault value
• Range controlRange control
• Null value controlNull value control
• Referential integrityReferential integrity
Missing dataMissing data
• substitute an estimatesubstitute an estimate
• report missing datareport missing data
• Sensitivity testingSensitivity testing
For example...For example...
Suppose you were designing the age field in Suppose you were designing the age field in a student record at your university. What a student record at your university. What decisions would you make about:decisions would you make about:
• data typedata type
• integrity (range, default, null)integrity (range, default, null)
• How might your decision vary by other How might your decision vary by other characteristics about the student such as degree characteristics about the student such as degree sought?sought?
Suppose you were designing the age field in Suppose you were designing the age field in a student record at your university. What a student record at your university. What decisions would you make about:decisions would you make about:
• data typedata type
• integrity (range, default, null)integrity (range, default, null)
• How might your decision vary by other How might your decision vary by other characteristics about the student such as degree characteristics about the student such as degree sought?sought?
Attribute groupings
Physical RecordPhysical Record: A group of fields stored in : A group of fields stored in adjacent memory locations and retrieved adjacent memory locations and retrieved together as a unit. together as a unit.
PagePage: The amount of data read or written in : The amount of data read or written in one I/O operation.one I/O operation.
Blocking FactorBlocking Factor: The number of physical : The number of physical records per page.records per page.
Database Access ModelDatabase Access Model
The goal in structuring physical records is to minimize performance bottlenecks resulting from disk accesses (accessing data from disk is
slow compared to main memory)
Attribute grouping:Denormalization
Attribute grouping:Denormalization
Process of transforming normalized Process of transforming normalized relations into denormalized physical record relations into denormalized physical record specificationsspecifications
• may partition a relation into more than one may partition a relation into more than one physical recordphysical record
• may combine attributes from different relations may combine attributes from different relations into one physical recordinto one physical record
Process of transforming normalized Process of transforming normalized relations into denormalized physical record relations into denormalized physical record specificationsspecifications
• may partition a relation into more than one may partition a relation into more than one physical recordphysical record
• may combine attributes from different relations may combine attributes from different relations into one physical recordinto one physical record
DenormalizationDenormalizationInvolves a trade-off:Involves a trade-off:
Reduced disk accesses and greater performance (due, for Reduced disk accesses and greater performance (due, for example, to fewer table joins)example, to fewer table joins)
- But -- But -
Introduction of anomalies (and thus redundancies) that Introduction of anomalies (and thus redundancies) that will necessitate extra data maintenancewill necessitate extra data maintenance
increase chance of errors and force reprogramming when increase chance of errors and force reprogramming when business rules changebusiness rules change
may optimize certain tasks at the expense of others (if may optimize certain tasks at the expense of others (if activities change, benefits may no longer exist)activities change, benefits may no longer exist)
Involves a trade-off:Involves a trade-off:
Reduced disk accesses and greater performance (due, for Reduced disk accesses and greater performance (due, for example, to fewer table joins)example, to fewer table joins)
- But -- But -
Introduction of anomalies (and thus redundancies) that Introduction of anomalies (and thus redundancies) that will necessitate extra data maintenancewill necessitate extra data maintenance
increase chance of errors and force reprogramming when increase chance of errors and force reprogramming when business rules changebusiness rules change
may optimize certain tasks at the expense of others (if may optimize certain tasks at the expense of others (if activities change, benefits may no longer exist)activities change, benefits may no longer exist)
Denormalization opportunitiesDenormalization opportunities
1:1 relationship1:1 relationship
M:M associative entity with non-key M:M associative entity with non-key attributesattributes
reference datareference data
1:1 relationship1:1 relationship
M:M associative entity with non-key M:M associative entity with non-key attributesattributes
reference datareference data
A possible denormali-zation situation: reference data
More denormalization options
Horizontal PartitioningHorizontal Partitioning: Distributing the : Distributing the rows of a table into several separate files.rows of a table into several separate files.
Vertical PartitioningVertical Partitioning: Distributing the : Distributing the columns of a table into several separate columns of a table into several separate files.files.
• The primary key must be repeated in each file.The primary key must be repeated in each file.
Combination of bothCombination of both
Partitioning AdvantagesAdvantages of Partitioning: of Partitioning:
• Records used together are grouped togetherRecords used together are grouped together
• Each partition can be optimized for performanceEach partition can be optimized for performance
• Security and recoverySecurity and recovery
• Partitions stored on different disks: less contentionPartitions stored on different disks: less contention
• Parallel processing capabilityParallel processing capability
DisadvantagesDisadvantages of Partitioning: of Partitioning:
• Slower retrievals when across partitionsSlower retrievals when across partitions
• Complexity for application programmersComplexity for application programmers
• Anomalies and extra storage space requirements due to Anomalies and extra storage space requirements due to duplication of data across partitionsduplication of data across partitions
How about this..How about this..
Consider the following normalized relations:Consider the following normalized relations:
STORE(STORE(Store_IdStore_Id, Region, Manager_Id, Square_Feet), Region, Manager_Id, Square_Feet)
EMPLOYEE(EMPLOYEE(Emp_IdEmp_Id, Store_Id, Name, Address), Store_Id, Name, Address)
DEPARTMENT(DEPARTMENT(Dept#,Dept#, Store_ID, Manager_Id, Store_ID, Manager_Id, Sales_Goal)Sales_Goal)
SCHEDULE(SCHEDULE(Dept#Dept#, , Emp_IdEmp_Id, , DateDate, hours), hours)
What opportunities might exist for denormalization?What opportunities might exist for denormalization?
Consider the following normalized relations:Consider the following normalized relations:
STORE(STORE(Store_IdStore_Id, Region, Manager_Id, Square_Feet), Region, Manager_Id, Square_Feet)
EMPLOYEE(EMPLOYEE(Emp_IdEmp_Id, Store_Id, Name, Address), Store_Id, Name, Address)
DEPARTMENT(DEPARTMENT(Dept#,Dept#, Store_ID, Manager_Id, Store_ID, Manager_Id, Sales_Goal)Sales_Goal)
SCHEDULE(SCHEDULE(Dept#Dept#, , Emp_IdEmp_Id, , DateDate, hours), hours)
What opportunities might exist for denormalization?What opportunities might exist for denormalization?
Physical Files Physical File: A file as stored on diskPhysical File: A file as stored on disk
Constructs to link two pieces of data:Constructs to link two pieces of data:
• Sequential storageSequential storage
• PointersPointers
File OrganizationFile Organization: How the files are arranged on the disk : How the files are arranged on the disk (more on this later)(more on this later)
Access MethodAccess Method: How the data can be retrieved based on : How the data can be retrieved based on the file organizationthe file organization
• Relative - data accessed as an offset from the most Relative - data accessed as an offset from the most recently referenced point in secondary memoryrecently referenced point in secondary memory
• Direct - data accessed as a result of a calculation to Direct - data accessed as a result of a calculation to generate the beginning address of a recordgenerate the beginning address of a record
File OrganizationsFile Organizations A technique for physically arranging the records of a file A technique for physically arranging the records of a file
on secondary storage devices.on secondary storage devices. Goals in selecting:Goals in selecting: ((trade-offstrade-offs exist, of course) exist, of course)
• Fast data retrievalFast data retrieval
• High throughput for input and maintenanceHigh throughput for input and maintenance
• Efficient use of storage spaceEfficient use of storage space
• Protection from failures or data lossProtection from failures or data loss
• Minimal need for reorganizationMinimal need for reorganization
• Accommodation for growthAccommodation for growth
• Security from unauthorized useSecurity from unauthorized use
A technique for physically arranging the records of a file A technique for physically arranging the records of a file on secondary storage devices.on secondary storage devices.
Goals in selecting:Goals in selecting: ((trade-offstrade-offs exist, of course) exist, of course)
• Fast data retrievalFast data retrieval
• High throughput for input and maintenanceHigh throughput for input and maintenance
• Efficient use of storage spaceEfficient use of storage space
• Protection from failures or data lossProtection from failures or data loss
• Minimal need for reorganizationMinimal need for reorganization
• Accommodation for growthAccommodation for growth
• Security from unauthorized useSecurity from unauthorized use
File OrganizationsFile Organizations
Sequential
Indexed
• Indexed Sequential
• Indexed Nonsequential
Hashed (also called Direct)
See Table 6-3 for comparison
Sequential
Indexed
• Indexed Sequential
• Indexed Nonsequential
Hashed (also called Direct)
See Table 6-3 for comparison
Sequential File Organization
Records of the file are stored in sequence by the primary key field values
Comparisons of file organizations:
(a) Sequential
Sequential RetrievalSequential Retrieval Consider a file of 10,000 records each occupying 1 pageConsider a file of 10,000 records each occupying 1 page
Queries that require processing all records will require Queries that require processing all records will require 10,000 accesses10,000 accesses
e.g., Find all items of type 'E'e.g., Find all items of type 'E'
Many disk accesses are wasted if few records meet the Many disk accesses are wasted if few records meet the conditioncondition
However, very effective if most or all records will be However, very effective if most or all records will be accessed (e.g., payroll)accessed (e.g., payroll)
Consider a file of 10,000 records each occupying 1 pageConsider a file of 10,000 records each occupying 1 page
Queries that require processing all records will require Queries that require processing all records will require 10,000 accesses10,000 accesses
e.g., Find all items of type 'E'e.g., Find all items of type 'E'
Many disk accesses are wasted if few records meet the Many disk accesses are wasted if few records meet the conditioncondition
However, very effective if most or all records will be However, very effective if most or all records will be accessed (e.g., payroll)accessed (e.g., payroll)
Indexed File Organization
Index concept is like index in a book
Indexed-sequential file organization: The records are stored sequentially by primary key values and there is an index built on the primary key field (and possibly indexes built on other fields, also)
(b) Indexed
Hashed File Organization
Hashing Algorithm: Converts a primary
key value into a record address
Division-remainder method is common
hashing algorithm(more to come on this)
(c ) Hashed
HashingHashing
A technique for reducing disk accesses for A technique for reducing disk accesses for directdirect
accessaccess
Avoids an indexAvoids an index
Number of accesses per record can be close to oneNumber of accesses per record can be close to one
The hash field is converted to a hash address by a The hash field is converted to a hash address by a
hash functionhash function
A technique for reducing disk accesses for A technique for reducing disk accesses for directdirect
accessaccess
Avoids an indexAvoids an index
Number of accesses per record can be close to oneNumber of accesses per record can be close to one
The hash field is converted to a hash address by a The hash field is converted to a hash address by a
hash functionhash function
HashingHashing
Shortcomings of HashingShortcomings of Hashing
Different hash fields may convert to the same hash Different hash fields may convert to the same hash addressaddress
• these are called Synonymsthese are called Synonyms
• store the colliding record in an overflow areastore the colliding record in an overflow area
Long synonym chains degrade performanceLong synonym chains degrade performance
There can be only one hash field per recordThere can be only one hash field per record
The file can no longer be processed sequentiallyThe file can no longer be processed sequentially
Different hash fields may convert to the same hash Different hash fields may convert to the same hash addressaddress
• these are called Synonymsthese are called Synonyms
• store the colliding record in an overflow areastore the colliding record in an overflow area
Long synonym chains degrade performanceLong synonym chains degrade performance
There can be only one hash field per recordThere can be only one hash field per record
The file can no longer be processed sequentiallyThe file can no longer be processed sequentially
ClusteringClustering
In some relational DBMS, related records from In some relational DBMS, related records from different tables that are often retrieved together different tables that are often retrieved together can be stored close together on diskcan be stored close together on disk
Because the related records are stored close to one Because the related records are stored close to one another on the physical disk, less time is needed to another on the physical disk, less time is needed to retrieve the dataretrieve the data
• E.g., Customer data and Order data may frequently be E.g., Customer data and Order data may frequently be retrieved togetherretrieved together
Can require substantial maintenance if the Can require substantial maintenance if the clustered data changes frequentlyclustered data changes frequently
In some relational DBMS, related records from In some relational DBMS, related records from different tables that are often retrieved together different tables that are often retrieved together can be stored close together on diskcan be stored close together on disk
Because the related records are stored close to one Because the related records are stored close to one another on the physical disk, less time is needed to another on the physical disk, less time is needed to retrieve the dataretrieve the data
• E.g., Customer data and Order data may frequently be E.g., Customer data and Order data may frequently be retrieved togetherretrieved together
Can require substantial maintenance if the Can require substantial maintenance if the clustered data changes frequentlyclustered data changes frequently
IndexingIndexing
An index is a table file that is used to determine the location of rows in another file that satisfy some condition
An index is a table file that is used to determine the location of rows in another file that satisfy some condition
Querying with an IndexQuerying with an Index
Read the index into memoryRead the index into memory
Search the index to find records meeting the Search the index to find records meeting the
conditioncondition
Access only those records containing required dataAccess only those records containing required data
Disk accesses are substantially reduced when the Disk accesses are substantially reduced when the
query involves few recordsquery involves few records
Read the index into memoryRead the index into memory
Search the index to find records meeting the Search the index to find records meeting the
conditioncondition
Access only those records containing required dataAccess only those records containing required data
Disk accesses are substantially reduced when the Disk accesses are substantially reduced when the
query involves few recordsquery involves few records
Maintaining an IndexMaintaining an Index Adding a record requires at least two disk accesses:
• Update the file
• Update the index
Trade-off:
Faster queries
Slower maintenance (additions, deletions, and updates of records)
• Thus, more static databases benefit more overall
Adding a record requires at least two disk accesses:
• Update the file
• Update the index
Trade-off:
Faster queries
Slower maintenance (additions, deletions, and updates of records)
• Thus, more static databases benefit more overall
Rules of Thumbfor Using Indexes
1. Indexes are most useful on larger tables
2. Index the primary key of each table(may be automatic, as in Access)
3. Indexes are useful on search fields (WHERE)
4. Indexes are also useful on fields used for sorting (ORDER BY) and categorizing (GROUP BY)
5. Most useful to index on a field when there are many different values for that field
Rules of Thumbfor Using Indexes
6. Find out the limits placed on indexing by your DBMS (Access allows 32 indexes per table, and no index may contain more than 10 fields)
7. Depending on the DBMS, null values may not be referenced from an index (thus, rows with a null value in the field that is indexed may not be found by a search using the index)
Rules for Adding Derived ColumnsRules for Adding Derived Columns
Use when aggregate values are regularly Use when aggregate values are regularly retrieved.retrieved.
Use when aggregate values are costly to Use when aggregate values are costly to calculate.calculate.
Permit updating only of source data.Permit updating only of source data.
Create triggers to cascade changes from Create triggers to cascade changes from source data.source data.
Use when aggregate values are regularly Use when aggregate values are regularly retrieved.retrieved.
Use when aggregate values are costly to Use when aggregate values are costly to calculate.calculate.
Permit updating only of source data.Permit updating only of source data.
Create triggers to cascade changes from Create triggers to cascade changes from source data.source data.
One Other Rule of Thumbfor Increasing PerformanceOne Other Rule of Thumb
for Increasing Performance
Consider contriving a shorter field or selecting another candidate key to substitute for a long, multi-field primary key (and all associated foreign keys)
Consider contriving a shorter field or selecting another candidate key to substitute for a long, multi-field primary key (and all associated foreign keys)
Query Optimizer Factors Type of Query
• Highly selective.
• All or most of the records of a file.
Unique fields
Size of files
Indexes
Join Method
• Nested-Loop
• Merge-Scan (Both files must be ordered or indexed on the join columns.)
More practiceMore practice Draw a composite usage map for the following:Draw a composite usage map for the following:
• PERSON(person_ID, name, address, DOB)PERSON(person_ID, name, address, DOB)
• PATIENT(PA_person_ID, Contact)PATIENT(PA_person_ID, Contact)
• PHYSICIAN(PH_person_ID, specialty)PHYSICIAN(PH_person_ID, specialty)
• PERFORMANCE(PA_person_ID, PH_person_ID, PERFORMANCE(PA_person_ID, PH_person_ID, Treatment#, Treatment_date, Treatment_time)Treatment#, Treatment_date, Treatment_time)
• CONSUMPTION(PA_person_ID, Item#, Date, Quantity)CONSUMPTION(PA_person_ID, Item#, Date, Quantity)
• ITEM(Item#, Description)ITEM(Item#, Description)
Make recommendations about denormalizing, Make recommendations about denormalizing, partitioning, file organization, and indexingpartitioning, file organization, and indexing
Draw a composite usage map for the following:Draw a composite usage map for the following:
• PERSON(person_ID, name, address, DOB)PERSON(person_ID, name, address, DOB)
• PATIENT(PA_person_ID, Contact)PATIENT(PA_person_ID, Contact)
• PHYSICIAN(PH_person_ID, specialty)PHYSICIAN(PH_person_ID, specialty)
• PERFORMANCE(PA_person_ID, PH_person_ID, PERFORMANCE(PA_person_ID, PH_person_ID, Treatment#, Treatment_date, Treatment_time)Treatment#, Treatment_date, Treatment_time)
• CONSUMPTION(PA_person_ID, Item#, Date, Quantity)CONSUMPTION(PA_person_ID, Item#, Date, Quantity)
• ITEM(Item#, Description)ITEM(Item#, Description)
Make recommendations about denormalizing, Make recommendations about denormalizing, partitioning, file organization, and indexingpartitioning, file organization, and indexing
RAIDRAID
RRedundant edundant AArrays of rrays of IInexpensive nexpensive DDisksisks
Exploits economies of scale of disk manufacturing for the Exploits economies of scale of disk manufacturing for the
computer marketcomputer market
Can give greater securityCan give greater security
Increases fault tolerance of systemsIncreases fault tolerance of systems
Not a replacement for regular backupNot a replacement for regular backup
RRedundant edundant AArrays of rrays of IInexpensive nexpensive DDisksisks
Exploits economies of scale of disk manufacturing for the Exploits economies of scale of disk manufacturing for the
computer marketcomputer market
Can give greater securityCan give greater security
Increases fault tolerance of systemsIncreases fault tolerance of systems
Not a replacement for regular backupNot a replacement for regular backup
RAIDRAID
The operating system sees a set of physical drives as The operating system sees a set of physical drives as
one logical driveone logical drive
Data are distributed across physical drivesData are distributed across physical drives
All levels, except 0, have data redundancy or error-All levels, except 0, have data redundancy or error-
correction features correction features
Parity codes or redundant data are used for data Parity codes or redundant data are used for data
recoveryrecovery
The operating system sees a set of physical drives as The operating system sees a set of physical drives as
one logical driveone logical drive
Data are distributed across physical drivesData are distributed across physical drives
All levels, except 0, have data redundancy or error-All levels, except 0, have data redundancy or error-
correction features correction features
Parity codes or redundant data are used for data Parity codes or redundant data are used for data
recoveryrecovery
MirroringMirroring WriteWrite
• Identical copies of file are written to each drive in arrayIdentical copies of file are written to each drive in array ReadRead
• Alternate pages are read simultaneously from each driveAlternate pages are read simultaneously from each drive
• Pages put together in memoryPages put together in memory
• Access time is reduced by approximately the number of disks in the arrayAccess time is reduced by approximately the number of disks in the array Read errorRead error
• Read required page from another driveRead required page from another drive TradeoffsTradeoffs
Provides data securityProvides data security Reduces access timeReduces access time Uses more disk spaceUses more disk space
WriteWrite
• Identical copies of file are written to each drive in arrayIdentical copies of file are written to each drive in array ReadRead
• Alternate pages are read simultaneously from each driveAlternate pages are read simultaneously from each drive
• Pages put together in memoryPages put together in memory
• Access time is reduced by approximately the number of disks in the arrayAccess time is reduced by approximately the number of disks in the array Read errorRead error
• Read required page from another driveRead required page from another drive TradeoffsTradeoffs
Provides data securityProvides data security Reduces access timeReduces access time Uses more disk spaceUses more disk space
MirroringMirroring
Complete Data Set
Complete Data Set
No parity
StripingStriping Three drive modelThree drive model WriteWrite
• Half of file to first driveHalf of file to first drive
• Half of file to second driveHalf of file to second drive
• Parity bit to third driveParity bit to third drive ReadRead
• Portions from each drive are put together in memoryPortions from each drive are put together in memory Read errorRead error
• Lost bits are reconstructed from third drive’s parity dataLost bits are reconstructed from third drive’s parity data TradeoffsTradeoffs
Provides data securityProvides data security Uses less storage space than mirroringUses less storage space than mirroring Not as fast as mirroringNot as fast as mirroring
Three drive modelThree drive model WriteWrite
• Half of file to first driveHalf of file to first drive
• Half of file to second driveHalf of file to second drive
• Parity bit to third driveParity bit to third drive ReadRead
• Portions from each drive are put together in memoryPortions from each drive are put together in memory Read errorRead error
• Lost bits are reconstructed from third drive’s parity dataLost bits are reconstructed from third drive’s parity data TradeoffsTradeoffs
Provides data securityProvides data security Uses less storage space than mirroringUses less storage space than mirroring Not as fast as mirroringNot as fast as mirroring
StripingStriping
One-Half Data Set
One-Half Data Set
Parity Codes
Database Architectures
Hierarchical
Network
Relational
Object-oriented
Multidimensional
Hierarchical modelsHierarchical models
Type of logical database model in which data is organized in a tree structure.
Records are divided into segments which are linked using pointers.
Parent and child data are stored together.
Type of logical database model in which data is organized in a tree structure.
Records are divided into segments which are linked using pointers.
Parent and child data are stored together.
Sample hierarchical modelSample hierarchical model
ROOT/PARENT
FIRST CHILD
2nd CHILD
RatingsRatings SalarySalary
CompensationCompensation JobJobAssignmentsAssignments
PensionPension InsuranceInsurance HealthHealth
BenefitsBenefits
EmployeeEmployee
Network modelNetwork model
Extends the hierarchical model by allowing a child to have zero, one, or many parents
No real theoretical base
Never widely used
Extends the hierarchical model by allowing a child to have zero, one, or many parents
No real theoretical base
Never widely used
STUDENTA
STUDENTB
STUDENTC
CLASS1
CLASS2
Comparing the alternativesComparing the alternatives
Hierarchical Network Relational OO
Efficiency High Medium-high
Lower Lower
Flexibility Low Low-medium
High High
Ease ofuse
Low Low-medium
High High**
Relation-shipsupported
1:M M:M 1:1, 1:M all
Hierarchical Network Relational OO
Efficiency High Medium-high
Lower Lower
Flexibility Low Low-medium
High High
Ease ofuse
Low Low-medium
High High**
Relation-shipsupported
1:M M:M 1:1, 1:M all
** OODBS are marketed as easy to use, but the transition from RDBMS is difficult