Height Exercise
We are going to take a sample of students from the class andcalculate a few statistics on their height.
I Person (P)
I Height in inches (Hi )
I Total Height
X
i
Hi
!
I Average Height
✓PHi
P
◆
I Marginal Height
✓�P
Hi
�P
◆
2/69
Outline
Introduction
Theory of the Firm
Technology of Production
Firm Productivity
Isoquants
Input Substitutability
Elasticity of Substitution
Special Production Functions
Returns to Scale
Technological Progress
3/69
Introduction
Q
P
D
S
I We have been talking about how consumers maximize utilityI =) That helped us derive the demand curve
I Now we are going to look at the theory behind how we derivethe supply curve
4/69
Theory of the Firm
We will address:
I How firms make cost-minimizing production decisions
I How (optimal) cost varies with output
I Characteristics of market supply
5/69
Technology of Production
Production Process: What do firms do?I Combine inputs to achieve an output
I Example of inputs -
labor, capital, equipment, raw materials
I A certain “technology” is used which tells us how muchoutput is attainable from a given set of inputs
6/69
Technology of Production
Production Process: What do firms do?I Combine inputs to achieve an output
I Example of inputs - labor, capital, equipment, raw materials
I A certain “technology” is used which tells us how muchoutput is attainable from a given set of inputs
6/69
Technology of Production
Production Process: What do firms do?I Combine inputs to achieve an output
I Example of inputs - labor, capital, equipment, raw materials
I A certain “technology” is used which tells us how muchoutput is attainable from a given set of inputs
6/69
Technology of ProductionSome Definitions
Factors of Production: resources (inputs), such as labor andcapital equipment, that firms use to manufacture goods andservices
Production Function: Tells us the maximum possible output thatcan be attainable by the firm for any given quantity of inputs
Q = f (L,K ,M) labor, capital, materialsQcorn = f (F , S ,A, L) fertilizer, seeds, acreage, labor
Q =
(f1
(L,K ,M)
f2
(L,K ,M)firm has two technology choices
I Production function depends on a given technology process(for now assume technology can’t be changed)
7/69
Technology of ProductionSome Definitions
Factors of Production: resources (inputs), such as labor andcapital equipment, that firms use to manufacture goods andservices
Production Function: Tells us the maximum possible output thatcan be attainable by the firm for any given quantity of inputs
Q = f (L,K ,M) labor, capital, materialsQcorn = f (F , S ,A, L) fertilizer, seeds, acreage, labor
Q =
(f1
(L,K ,M)
f2
(L,K ,M)firm has two technology choices
I Production function depends on a given technology process(for now assume technology can’t be changed)
7/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B
- not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D
- technically infeasible
8/69
Production FunctionsSuppose you only had one input: Labor
Q = f (L)
L
Q
Q = f (L)
A
B - not being technically e�cient
Ccan get to here with same L
D - technically infeasible
8/69
More Definitions
Production Set: the set of all technically feasible combinations
I Points on or below the production function (A,B ,C )
I D not in production set because at that input, that output isunattainable
Technically E�cient
I Points A and C
I A technically e�cient firm attains the maximum possibleoutput from its inputs
Technically Ine�cient
I Point C
I Firms that get less output from its inputs than is technicallypossible
Technically Infeasible Point D
9/69
A Note on Inputs
It is important to know that the variables in the productionfunction are flows (amount of units used per unit of time) and notstocks
I Stock of capital: total factory installation
I Flow of capital: machine hours used per unit of time inproduction
What do we mean by captial?
I IS - physical goods - like robots, conveyor belts, ovens - thatcan produce other goods
I IS NOT - financial capital
10/69
Firm Productivity
1. Average Product (APL) =Total Product
Quantity of Labor=
Q
LI Average amount of output per unit of laborI slope of ray from origin to point on curve
2. Marginal Product
(MPL) =Change in total product
Change in quantity of labor=
�Q
�L=
dQ
dL=
@Q
@LI additional output from a little more input (labor)I slope of the curve at a specific amount of labor
Let’s look at these on the Total Production Function
11/69
Firm Productivity
1. Average Product (APL) =Total Product
Quantity of Labor=
Q
LI Average amount of output per unit of laborI slope of ray from origin to point on curve
2. Marginal Product
(MPL) =Change in total product
Change in quantity of labor=
�Q
�L=
dQ
dL=
@Q
@LI additional output from a little more input (labor)I slope of the curve at a specific amount of labor
Let’s look at these on the Total Production Function
11/69
Firm Productivity
1. Average Product (APL) =Total Product
Quantity of Labor=
Q
LI Average amount of output per unit of laborI slope of ray from origin to point on curve
2. Marginal Product
(MPL) =Change in total product
Change in quantity of labor=
�Q
�L=
dQ
dL=
@Q
@LI additional output from a little more input (labor)I slope of the curve at a specific amount of labor
Let’s look at these on the Total Production Function
11/69
Total Production Function
L
QQ = f (L)
12/69
Total Production Function
I This function only depends on L. Could be that the firm alsouses K , but in this case capital is held fixed (only seeing halfof the story)
I Average Product vs. Marginal Product
I Increasing Return to Labor (MPL)
I Diminishing Return to Labor (MPL)
I Diminishing Total Return
I MPL and APL cross
13/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?
I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?
I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?
I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?
I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?
I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
Principle that as the usage of one input increases, holding thequantities of all other inputs fixed, a point will be reached beyondwhich the MP of that variable will decrease
I Example - Suppose I gave 3 people in this room a stack ofpapers and asked them to cut each sheet in half. How manypapers could they cut in half in 1 minute if I gave them:
I no scissors?I 1 pair of scissors?I 2 pair of scissors?I 3 pair of scissors?I 4 pair of scissors?I 10 pair of scissors?
14/69
Relationship between MP and AP
I When average product is increasing in labor, the marginalproduct is greater than the average product, MPL > APL
I When average product is decreasing in labor, the marginalproduct is less than the average product, MPL < APL
I When average product neither decreases nor increases inlabor, the marginal product is equal to the average product,MPL = APL
15/69
Two Input Production Function
16/69
Marginal Product
MPL =Change in quantity of output
Change in quantity of labor
����K held constant
=�Q
�L
����¯K
=@Q
@L
MPK =�Q
�K
����¯L
=@Q
@K
I will describe the steepness of the hill going in the “K”direction but holding level of L constant
17/69
Isoquant
These are similar to indi↵erence curves, but rather than holdingutility fixed, we fix the quantity
Isoquant (“same quantity”): a curve that shows all of thecombinations of labor and capital (or any 2 inputs) that canproduce a given level of output
18/69
Isoquants
19/69
Isoquants
20/69
Properties of Isoquants
I Downward sloping if MPL and MPK are both positive (or ifthey are both negative)
I Upward sloping if MPL is negative or MPK is negative (justone of them)
I Curvature tells how easily substitutable the two inputs are
21/69
How do I graph an isoquant?Let’s say the production function is Q =
pKL. Let’s graph the
isoquant for Q = 20.
I In general, solve for K in terms of Q and L.I General isoquant
Q2 = KL
K =Q2
L
I Isoquant for Q = 20pKL = 20
KL = 400
K =400
L
I Then, graph that line
22/69
How do I graph an isoquant?Let’s say the production function is Q =
pKL. Let’s graph the
isoquant for Q = 20.I In general, solve for K in terms of Q and L.
I General isoquant
Q2 = KL
K =Q2
L
I Isoquant for Q = 20pKL = 20
KL = 400
K =400
L
I Then, graph that line
22/69
How do I graph an isoquant?Let’s say the production function is Q =
pKL. Let’s graph the
isoquant for Q = 20.I In general, solve for K in terms of Q and L.I General isoquant
Q2 = KL
K =Q2
L
I Isoquant for Q = 20pKL = 20
KL = 400
K =400
L
I Then, graph that line
22/69
How do I graph an isoquant?Let’s say the production function is Q =
pKL. Let’s graph the
isoquant for Q = 20.I In general, solve for K in terms of Q and L.I General isoquant
Q2 = KL
K =Q2
L
I Isoquant for Q = 20pKL = 20
KL = 400
K =400
L
I Then, graph that line
22/69
Economic and Uneconomic Regions of Production
IUneconomic Region of Production: The region ofupward-sloping of backward-bending isoquants. In theuneconomic region, at least one input has a negative marginalproduct.
IEconomic Region of Production: The region whereisoquants are downward sloping.
23/69
Economic and Uneconomic Regions of Production
24/69
Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution of Labor forCapital
MRTSL,K : Rate at which the quantity of capital can be decreased(increased) for every one unit increase (decrease) in the quantity oflabor, holding the quantity of output constant
I Similar concept to marginal rate of substitution
MRTSL,K = ��K
�L= �dK
dL
I Like MRS it is the opposite of the slope of our isoquants
25/69
MRTSL,K
26/69
MRTSL,K
I Point A on graph MRTSL,K = 2.5 =) starting from point Awe can substitute one man hour per day for 2.5 machine hoursper day and keep output constant
I Point B on graph MRTSL,K = 0.4 =) starting from point Bwe can substitute one man hour per day for 0.4 machine hoursper day and keep output constant
I As we move along this isoquant to right the MRTSL,Kdecreases (the slope becomes less negative, or flatter). As weget more labor, we are willing to give up more labor foranother unit of machine hours
27/69
MRTSL,K
Diminishing Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution:MRTSL,K diminishes as the quantity of labor increases along anisoquant.
I Isoquants that exhibit this behavior are convex, or bowed intoward the origin
28/69
MRTSL,K
But, there is more, we can relate this to the marginal products
Q = Q(L,K )
total di↵erentiate: dQ =@Q
@LdL+
@Q
@KdK
dQ = MPLdL+MPKdK
along isoquant dQ = 0: 0 = MPLdL+MPKdK
MPLdL = �MPKdK
MPL
MPK= �dK
dL= MRTSL,K
29/69
Problem
Suppose a firm’s production function is Q = KL.
a) What is the MRTSL,K?
b) Is the MRTSL,K diminishing?
30/69
Firm’s Input Substitution Opportunities
Now, let’s look at 2 di↵erent production functions
1. Di�cult to substitute labor for capital
2. East to substitute labor for capital
31/69
Di�cult to substitute labor for capital
32/69
Di�cult to substitute labor for capital
I Even if they increase labor from 100 to 400 man-hours, theyare only able to reduce machine-hours by 5
I Almost no substitutability between capital and labor
I Input mix
✓K
L
◆won’t change much
I Above point A, the MRTSL,K is almost 1 and below point A,it goes to 0 quickly
I L-shaped isoquants (similar to perfect complements, but notquite “perfect”)
33/69
Easy to substitute labor for capital
34/69
Easy to substitute labor for capital
I When they increase man-hours from 100 to 400 (quadruple),they are able to reduce machine-hours by more than half (30machine-hours)
I MRTSL,K changes gradually as you move along the isoquant
I Nearly straight lined isoquants (like perfect substititues, butnot quite “perfect”)
=) curvature of the isoquant tell us about the substitutability ofK for L
35/69
Measuring Susbstitutability
Elasticity of Substitution
I measures how quickly the marginal rate of technicalsubstitution of labor for capital (MRTSL,K ) changes as wemove along the isoquant
How can we look at this? Let’s think about the capital-labor ratio
K
L
I As we move along isoquant to right K -L ratio decreases
I Capital-labor ratio is measured by the ray from origin to point
on isoquant (e.g., Point AK0
L0
)
36/69
Measuring Susbstitutability
Elasticity of Substitution
I measures how quickly the marginal rate of technicalsubstitution of labor for capital (MRTSL,K ) changes as wemove along the isoquant
How can we look at this? Let’s think about the capital-labor ratio
K
L
I As we move along isoquant to right K -L ratio decreases
I Capital-labor ratio is measured by the ray from origin to point
on isoquant (e.g., Point AK0
L0
)
36/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
K -L Ratio Graphically
L
K
Q1
A
B
K0
L0
K -L ratio =K0
L0
K1
L1
K -L ratio =K1
L1
K
Ldecreases moving along isoquant
37/69
Notes on K -L ratio and MRTSL,K
I Capital-labor ratio decreases moving right (increasing L) alongthe isoquant
I As you move along the isoquant MRTSL,K may also decreaseI If K -L ratio (input mix) changes a lot but the MRTSL,K does
notI Then the inputs are easily substitutable in the production
process
I On the other hand, if the K -L ratio (input mix) changes alittle bit and the MRTSL,K changes a lot
I Then substitution must be di�cult
38/69
Elasticity of SubstitutionI The elasticity of substitution is a scale-free (does not depend
on units) measure of this responsiveness of MRTSL,K tochanges in the K -L ratio
� =%� in K -L ratio
%�MRTSL,K=
d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K·MRTSL,K
K/L
I Note: Along an isoquant K/L and MRTSL,K always move inthe same direction. Therefore, � is always positive.
� � 0
I For a large �I Big numerator / small denominatorI Lots of substitutability
I For a small �I Small numerator / big denominatorI Less substitutability
39/69
Elasticity of SubstitutionI The elasticity of substitution is a scale-free (does not depend
on units) measure of this responsiveness of MRTSL,K tochanges in the K -L ratio
� =%� in K -L ratio
%�MRTSL,K=
d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K·MRTSL,K
K/L
I Note: Along an isoquant K/L and MRTSL,K always move inthe same direction. Therefore, � is always positive.
� � 0
I For a large �I Big numerator / small denominatorI Lots of substitutability
I For a small �I Small numerator / big denominatorI Less substitutability
39/69
Elasticity of SubstitutionI The elasticity of substitution is a scale-free (does not depend
on units) measure of this responsiveness of MRTSL,K tochanges in the K -L ratio
� =%� in K -L ratio
%�MRTSL,K=
d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K·MRTSL,K
K/L
I Note: Along an isoquant K/L and MRTSL,K always move inthe same direction. Therefore, � is always positive.
� � 0
I For a large �I Big numerator / small denominatorI Lots of substitutability
I For a small �I Small numerator / big denominatorI Less substitutability
39/69
Elasticity of SubstitutionI The elasticity of substitution is a scale-free (does not depend
on units) measure of this responsiveness of MRTSL,K tochanges in the K -L ratio
� =%� in K -L ratio
%�MRTSL,K=
d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K·MRTSL,K
K/L
I Note: Along an isoquant K/L and MRTSL,K always move inthe same direction. Therefore, � is always positive.
� � 0
I For a large �I Big numerator / small denominatorI Lots of substitutability
I For a small �I Small numerator / big denominatorI Less substitutability
39/69
Special Production Functions
1. Linear
2. Fixed-proportions
3. Cobb-Douglas
4. Constant Elasticity of Substitution
40/69
Linear Production Function
Q = aL+ bK where a and b are positive constants
Set-Up: You have a stand that sells french fries. It is calledFreddie’s French Fry stand. You can either use Idaho potatoes (I )or Maine potatoes (M) to make your french fries (Q). Yourproduction function is given as:
Q = 2I +M
Draw the isoquant for Q = 2 putting M on the horizontal
axis.
41/69
Linear Production Function
Q = aL+ bK where a and b are positive constants
Set-Up: You have a stand that sells french fries. It is calledFreddie’s French Fry stand. You can either use Idaho potatoes (I )or Maine potatoes (M) to make your french fries (Q). Yourproduction function is given as:
Q = 2I +M
Draw the isoquant for Q = 2 putting M on the horizontal
axis.
41/69
Linear Production Function
Q = aL+ bK where a and b are positive constants
Set-Up: You have a stand that sells french fries. It is calledFreddie’s French Fry stand. You can either use Idaho potatoes (I )or Maine potatoes (M) to make your french fries (Q). Yourproduction function is given as:
Q = 2I +M
Draw the isoquant for Q = 2 putting M on the horizontal
axis.
41/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
M
I
I = 1� M
2
I = 0 =) M = 2
M = 0 =) I = 1
1
2
Q = 2
42/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
M
I
I = 1� M
2
I = 0 =) M = 2
M = 0 =) I = 1
1
2
Q = 2
42/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
M
I
I = 1� M
2
I = 0 =) M = 2
M = 0 =) I = 1
1
2
Q = 2
42/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
M
I
I = 1� M
2
I = 0 =) M = 2
M = 0 =) I = 1
1
2
Q = 2
42/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
M
I
I = 1� M
2
I = 0 =) M = 2
M = 0 =) I = 1
1
2
Q = 2
42/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
I also could have said: “Freddie can make 2 servings of french frieswith either 1 Idaho potato or 2 Maine potatoes.” And you wouldhave to come up with that production function.
What is the slope of the isoquant?
MRTSM,I =MPM
MPI=
@Q/@M
@Q/@I=
1
2
I Slope is -0.5 (a constant slope and constant MRTSM,I )
I You are willing to give up half an Idaho potato for one Mainepotato (the Maine potatoes must be smaller...)
43/69
Freddie’s French Fry Stand
What is the elasticity of substitution?
� =%�(K/L)
%�MRTSM,I=
?
0= 1
I Note, the MRTSM,I is constant to the change is always 0.
I So, goods are infinitely (perfectly) substitutable for each other
I Perfect substitutes do not require that they have to besubstituted 1 for 1, only in some constant ratio (2 Maine for 1Idaho in this case)
44/69
Fixed-Proportions Production Function
Q = min(aK , bL) where a and b are positive constants
Set-Up: You have a factory that makes cerial. It is called Cindi’sCinnamon Crunch. Your factory puts 12oz. of cereal (C ) into abox (B). Your production function is given as:
Q = min(B ,C
12)
Draw the isoquants for Q = 1 and Q = 2 putting C on the
horizontal axis.
45/69
Fixed-Proportions Production Function
Q = min(aK , bL) where a and b are positive constants
Set-Up: You have a factory that makes cerial. It is called Cindi’sCinnamon Crunch. Your factory puts 12oz. of cereal (C ) into abox (B). Your production function is given as:
Q = min(B ,C
12)
Draw the isoquants for Q = 1 and Q = 2 putting C on the
horizontal axis.
45/69
Fixed-Proportions Production Function
Q = min(aK , bL) where a and b are positive constants
Set-Up: You have a factory that makes cerial. It is called Cindi’sCinnamon Crunch. Your factory puts 12oz. of cereal (C ) into abox (B). Your production function is given as:
Q = min(B ,C
12)
Draw the isoquants for Q = 1 and Q = 2 putting C on the
horizontal axis.
45/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
C
B
B =C
12B
C=
1
12
AQ = 11
12B
C
Q = 22
24
46/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
C
B
B =C
12
B
C=
1
12
AQ = 11
12B
C
Q = 22
24
46/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
C
B
B =C
12B
C=
1
12
AQ = 11
12B
C
Q = 22
24
46/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
C
B
B =C
12B
C=
1
12
AQ = 11
12
B
C
Q = 22
24
46/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
C
B
B =C
12B
C=
1
12
AQ = 11
12B
C
Q = 22
24
46/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
C
B
B =C
12B
C=
1
12
AQ = 11
12B
C
Q = 22
24
46/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
What is the elasticity of substitution?
MRTSC ,B - Above A = 1Below A = 0At A it is undefined
So, moving from just above A to just below A the MRTSC ,B
changes an infinite amount, for a small change in C/B . Thus,
� = 0
There is no ability to substitute one input for the other. (perfectcomplements)
47/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
What is the elasticity of substitution?
MRTSC ,B - Above A = 1Below A = 0At A it is undefined
So, moving from just above A to just below A the MRTSC ,B
changes an infinite amount, for a small change in C/B . Thus,
� = 0
There is no ability to substitute one input for the other. (perfectcomplements)
47/69
Cindi’s Cinnamon Crunch
What is the elasticity of substitution?
MRTSC ,B - Above A = 1Below A = 0At A it is undefined
So, moving from just above A to just below A the MRTSC ,B
changes an infinite amount, for a small change in C/B . Thus,
� = 0
There is no ability to substitute one input for the other. (perfectcomplements)
47/69
Cobb-Douglas Production Function
Q = AL↵K� where ↵ � 0, � � 0, and A � 0
With Cobb-Douglas there is some substitutability between L and K
48/69
Cobb-Douglas Isoquants
L
K
Q = 1Q = 4
49/69
Cobb-Douglas
What is the MRTSL,K? Q = AL↵K�
MPL
MPK=
↵AL↵�1K�
�AL↵K��1
MRTSL,K =↵K
�L
orK
L=
�
↵MRTSL,K
What is the elasticity of substitution of Cobb-Douglas?
� =d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K
MRTSL,KK/L
=
✓�
↵
◆MRTSL,K�↵MRTSL,K
=
✓�
↵
◆↵
�= 1
50/69
Cobb-Douglas
What is the MRTSL,K? Q = AL↵K�
MPL
MPK=
↵AL↵�1K�
�AL↵K��1
MRTSL,K =↵K
�L
orK
L=
�
↵MRTSL,K
What is the elasticity of substitution of Cobb-Douglas?
� =d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K
MRTSL,KK/L
=
✓�
↵
◆MRTSL,K�↵MRTSL,K
=
✓�
↵
◆↵
�= 1
50/69
Cobb-Douglas
What is the MRTSL,K? Q = AL↵K�
MPL
MPK=
↵AL↵�1K�
�AL↵K��1
MRTSL,K =↵K
�L
orK
L=
�
↵MRTSL,K
What is the elasticity of substitution of Cobb-Douglas?
� =d(K/L)
dMRTSL,K
MRTSL,KK/L
=
✓�
↵
◆MRTSL,K�↵MRTSL,K
=
✓�
↵
◆↵
�= 1
50/69
Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES)
We have already seen three types of production functions with aconstant elasticity of substitution:
1. Linear Production Function - � = 12. Fixed Proportions Production Function - � = 0
3. Cobb-Douglas - � = 1
There is a single function that contains these three special casefunctions (and every other � in between)
Q =haL
��1
� + bK��1
�
i ���1
where a, b, and � are positive constants and � is the elasticity ofsubstitution
51/69
Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES)
52/69
Characteristics of Production Functions
Linear � = 1 Inputs are perfect substitutesIsoquants are straight lines
Fixed-proportions � = 0 Inputs are perfect complementsIsoquants are L-shaped
Cobb-Douglas � = 1 Isoquants are curvesCES 0 � 1 Includes above three as special
casesShape of isoquants varies
Note: If you can take the derivative of the CES function to findthe marginal product of K and L and you find that fun, then youshould study hard and get your PhD in Economics...
53/69
Practice - Production Functions
Suppose production technology takes the form Q = K 2L2 � L3.Let K = 10.
a) Over what range of L does the production function exhibitincreasing marginal returns, diminishing marginal returns, anddiminishing total returns?
54/69
Returns to Scale
Returns to Scale: The concept that tells us the % by whichoutput will increase (decrease) when all inputs are increased(decreased) by a given %
=%�(quantity of output)
%�(quantity of all inputs)
Note: When we were looking at the marginal product, it wasalways with respect to one input, holding the other constant. Here,we are thinking about what happens when BOTH inputs arechanged by the same percent (or proportional) amount
55/69
Returns to Scale, Example
For example, think of a two input production function K and LI Both K and L are increased by some proportion � > 1
I E.g., � = 2 (doubled)I K ! �K ! 2KI L ! �L ! 2L
I Define � as the corresponding proportionate increase in QI Q ! �Q
We want to know how � relates to �.� > �, increasing returns to scale
doubling inputs more than doubles output� = �, constant returns to scale
doubling inputs exactly doubles output� < �, decreasing returns to scale
doubling inputs less than doubles output
56/69
Returns to Scale, Example
For example, think of a two input production function K and LI Both K and L are increased by some proportion � > 1
I E.g., � = 2 (doubled)I K ! �K ! 2KI L ! �L ! 2L
I Define � as the corresponding proportionate increase in QI Q ! �Q
We want to know how � relates to �.
� > �, increasing returns to scaledoubling inputs more than doubles output
� = �, constant returns to scaledoubling inputs exactly doubles output
� < �, decreasing returns to scaledoubling inputs less than doubles output
56/69
Returns to Scale, Example
For example, think of a two input production function K and LI Both K and L are increased by some proportion � > 1
I E.g., � = 2 (doubled)I K ! �K ! 2KI L ! �L ! 2L
I Define � as the corresponding proportionate increase in QI Q ! �Q
We want to know how � relates to �.� > �, increasing returns to scale
doubling inputs more than doubles output
� = �, constant returns to scaledoubling inputs exactly doubles output
� < �, decreasing returns to scaledoubling inputs less than doubles output
56/69
Returns to Scale, Example
For example, think of a two input production function K and LI Both K and L are increased by some proportion � > 1
I E.g., � = 2 (doubled)I K ! �K ! 2KI L ! �L ! 2L
I Define � as the corresponding proportionate increase in QI Q ! �Q
We want to know how � relates to �.� > �, increasing returns to scale
doubling inputs more than doubles output� = �, constant returns to scale
doubling inputs exactly doubles output
� < �, decreasing returns to scaledoubling inputs less than doubles output
56/69
Returns to Scale, Example
For example, think of a two input production function K and LI Both K and L are increased by some proportion � > 1
I E.g., � = 2 (doubled)I K ! �K ! 2KI L ! �L ! 2L
I Define � as the corresponding proportionate increase in QI Q ! �Q
We want to know how � relates to �.� > �, increasing returns to scale
doubling inputs more than doubles output� = �, constant returns to scale
doubling inputs exactly doubles output� < �, decreasing returns to scale
doubling inputs less than doubles output
56/69
What type of returns to scale?
57/69
What type of returns to scale?
58/69
What type of returns to scale?
59/69
Returns to Scale - Cobb-DouglasDoes a Cobb-Douglas production function exhibit increasing,decreasing, or constant returns to scale?Q = AL↵K�
Let K1
and L1
denote the initial inputs of labor and capital whichyields quantity Q
1
. Both inputs are then increased by theproportional amount � > 1 to get a new quantity Q
2
. Then, wejust need to compare how Q
1
and Q2
are related.
Q2
= A(�L1
)↵(�K1
)�
= �↵+�AL↵1
K�1
= �↵+�Q1
I If ↵+ � > 1 then �↵+� > �. So, increasing returns to scaleI if ↵+ � = 1 then �↵+� = �. So, constant returns to scaleI if ↵+ � < 1 then �↵+� < �. So, decreasing returns to scale
60/69
Returns to Scale - Cobb-DouglasDoes a Cobb-Douglas production function exhibit increasing,decreasing, or constant returns to scale?Q = AL↵K�
Let K1
and L1
denote the initial inputs of labor and capital whichyields quantity Q
1
. Both inputs are then increased by theproportional amount � > 1 to get a new quantity Q
2
. Then, wejust need to compare how Q
1
and Q2
are related.
Q2
= A(�L1
)↵(�K1
)�
= �↵+�AL↵1
K�1
= �↵+�Q1
I If ↵+ � > 1 then �↵+� > �. So, increasing returns to scaleI if ↵+ � = 1 then �↵+� = �. So, constant returns to scaleI if ↵+ � < 1 then �↵+� < �. So, decreasing returns to scale
60/69
Returns to Scale - Cobb-DouglasDoes a Cobb-Douglas production function exhibit increasing,decreasing, or constant returns to scale?Q = AL↵K�
Let K1
and L1
denote the initial inputs of labor and capital whichyields quantity Q
1
. Both inputs are then increased by theproportional amount � > 1 to get a new quantity Q
2
. Then, wejust need to compare how Q
1
and Q2
are related.
Q2
= A(�L1
)↵(�K1
)�
= �↵+�AL↵1
K�1
= �↵+�Q1
I If ↵+ � > 1 then �↵+� > �. So, increasing returns to scale
I if ↵+ � = 1 then �↵+� = �. So, constant returns to scaleI if ↵+ � < 1 then �↵+� < �. So, decreasing returns to scale
60/69
Returns to Scale - Cobb-DouglasDoes a Cobb-Douglas production function exhibit increasing,decreasing, or constant returns to scale?Q = AL↵K�
Let K1
and L1
denote the initial inputs of labor and capital whichyields quantity Q
1
. Both inputs are then increased by theproportional amount � > 1 to get a new quantity Q
2
. Then, wejust need to compare how Q
1
and Q2
are related.
Q2
= A(�L1
)↵(�K1
)�
= �↵+�AL↵1
K�1
= �↵+�Q1
I If ↵+ � > 1 then �↵+� > �. So, increasing returns to scaleI if ↵+ � = 1 then �↵+� = �. So, constant returns to scale
I if ↵+ � < 1 then �↵+� < �. So, decreasing returns to scale
60/69
Returns to Scale - Cobb-DouglasDoes a Cobb-Douglas production function exhibit increasing,decreasing, or constant returns to scale?Q = AL↵K�
Let K1
and L1
denote the initial inputs of labor and capital whichyields quantity Q
1
. Both inputs are then increased by theproportional amount � > 1 to get a new quantity Q
2
. Then, wejust need to compare how Q
1
and Q2
are related.
Q2
= A(�L1
)↵(�K1
)�
= �↵+�AL↵1
K�1
= �↵+�Q1
I If ↵+ � > 1 then �↵+� > �. So, increasing returns to scaleI if ↵+ � = 1 then �↵+� = �. So, constant returns to scaleI if ↵+ � < 1 then �↵+� < �. So, decreasing returns to scale
60/69
Practice - Returns to Scale
Suppose the production function is:
Q = 2K + 3L
a) What types of inputs are K and L?
b) Does this production function exhibit increasing, constant ordecreasing returns to scale?
61/69
Practice - Constant Elasticity of Substitution
Consider a CES production function given by Q =⇥K 0.5 + L0.5
⇤2
.
a) What is the elasticity of substitution for this productionfunction?
b) Find the MPL, MPK , and MRTSL,K .
c) Does this production function exhibit increasing, decreasing, orconstant returns to scale?
d) Suppose that the production function took the form
Q =⇥100 + K 0.5 + L0.5
⇤2
. Does this production functionexhibit increasing, decreasing, or constant returns to scale?
62/69
Returns to Scale vs. Diminishing Marginal Returns
63/69
Technological Progress
So far, we have treated the firm’s technology as fixed. However,we know that overtime technology changes (improves) and thuschanges the firm’s production function.
ITechnological Progress: A change in a production processthat enables a firm to achieve more output from a givencombination of inputs, or get the same output for less inputs
Let’s assume that we have production technology that only uses Kand L. There are three categories of technological progress.
1. Neutral technological progressI Isoquant shifts inward (produce more output for less input)I MRTSL,K remains unchanged (curve of isoquant stays the
same)
64/69
Technological Progress
So far, we have treated the firm’s technology as fixed. However,we know that overtime technology changes (improves) and thuschanges the firm’s production function.
ITechnological Progress: A change in a production processthat enables a firm to achieve more output from a givencombination of inputs, or get the same output for less inputs
Let’s assume that we have production technology that only uses Kand L. There are three categories of technological progress.
1. Neutral technological progressI Isoquant shifts inward (produce more output for less input)I MRTSL,K remains unchanged (curve of isoquant stays the
same)
64/69
Technological Progress
So far, we have treated the firm’s technology as fixed. However,we know that overtime technology changes (improves) and thuschanges the firm’s production function.
ITechnological Progress: A change in a production processthat enables a firm to achieve more output from a givencombination of inputs, or get the same output for less inputs
Let’s assume that we have production technology that only uses Kand L. There are three categories of technological progress.
1. Neutral technological progressI Isoquant shifts inward (produce more output for less input)I MRTSL,K remains unchanged (curve of isoquant stays the
same)
64/69
Neutral Technological Progress
65/69
Technological Progress
2. Labor-saving Technological ProgressI Isoquant shifts inwardsI MPK increases relative to MPLI MRTSL,K flattens along a ray from originI Technical advances in capital equipment like robots and
computers
66/69
Labor-Saving Technological Progress
67/69
Technological Progress
3. Capital-saving Technological ProgressI Isoquant shifts inwardsI MPL increases relative to MPKI MRTSL,K steepens along a ray from originI Education or skill level of workforce improves more quickly
than technical advances in capital
68/69
Capital-Saving Technological Progress
69/69
Skill-Biased Technical Change
Assume that there are two types of labor: high-skill and low-skill.Both inputs exhibit diminishing marginal products. Two thingshave been observed over the last half-century.
1. The ratio of high-skill workers to low-skill workers has beenincreasing (more people are graduating college)
2. The wages of high-skill workers relative to low-skill workershas also been increasing
How can this be if we have diminishing marginal product?
I Technological progress over last half-century (e.g., informationtechnology, computers) tended to be complementary to skilledlabor
70/69