CHAPTER 5 Externalities Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Jan 05, 2016
CHAPTER 5
Externalities
Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
5-2
Externalities
• Externality – An activity on one entity that affects the welfare of another entity in a way that is outside the market mechanism
• Not an Externality – suburban-urban migration example
5-3
The Nature of Externalities
• Privately-owned versus commonly-owned resources
• Externalities can be produced by consumers as well as firms
• Externalities are reciprocal in nature
• Externalities can be positive
• Public goods can be viewed as a special kind of externality
5-4
The Nature of Externalities-Graphical Analysis
Q per year
$
MB
0
MD
MPC
MSC = MPC + MD
Q1Q*
Actual outputSocially efficient output
ab
c
d
f
e
g
h
5-5
What Pollutants Do Harm?
• Empirical Evidence: What is the Effect of Pollution on Health?
• What Activities Produce Pollutants?
• What is the Value of the Damage Done?
• Empirical Evidence: The Effect of Air Pollution on Housing Values
5-6
Bargaining and the Coase Theorem
Q per year
$
MB
0
MD
MPC
MSC = MPC + MD
Q1Q*
c
dg
h
5-7
The Coase Theorem
• Coase Theorem – Provided that transaction casts are negligible, an efficient solution to an externality problem is achieved as long as someone is assigned property rights, independent of who is assigned those rights
• Assumptions necessary for Coase Theorem to work– The costs to the parties of bargaining are low
– The owners of resources can identify the source of damages to their property and legally prevent damages
5-8
Other Private Solutions
• Mergers
• Social conventions
5-9
Public Responses to Externalities - Taxes
Q per year
$
MB
0
MD
MPC
MSC = MPC + MD
Q1Q*
c
d
(MPC + cd)
Pigouviantax revenues
i
j
5-10
Public Responses to Externalities - Subsidies
Q per year
$
MB
0
MD
MPC
MSC = MPC + MD
Q1Q*
c
d
(MPC + cd)
i
jgk
h
f
e
Pigouviansubsidy
5-11
Public Responses to Externalities- Emissions Fee
0Pollution reduction
MSB
MC
e*
f*
$
5-12
Emissions Fees Continued-Uniform Pollution Reductions
Bart’spollutionreduction
Homer’spollutionreduction
50 75 90 50 75 90
MCB
MCH
25
f = $50
f = $50
Bart’s TaxPayment Homer’s Tax
Payment
5-13
Public Responses to Externalities- Cap-and-Trade
Bart’spollutionreduction
Homer’spollutionreduction
50 75 90 50 75 90
MCB
MCH
25
f = $50
f = $50
10
a
b
5-14
Cap-and-Trade vs. Emissions Fee
0Pollution reduction
MSB
MC*
e*
f*
$
MC’
ef e’
Too much pollution reductionToo little pollution reduction
5-15
Cap-and-Trade v Emissions Fee
0Pollution reduction
MC*
e*
f*
$
MC’
ef e’
MSB
Too much pollution reductionToo little pollution reduction
5-16
Emissions Fee v Cap-and-Trade
• Responsiveness to Inflation
• Responsiveness to Cost Changes
• Responsiveness to Uncertainty
• Distributional Effects– Emissions fee– Cap-and-Trade
• Policy Perspective: Addressing Climate Change
5-17
Command-and-Control Regulation
• Incentive-based regulations
• Command-and-control regulations– Technology standard– Performance standard
• Is command-and-control ever better?– Hot spots
5-18
The U.S. Response
• Clean Air Act– 1970 amendments– Command-and-control in the 70s– How well did it work?
5-19
Progress with Incentive-Based Approaches
• Policy Perspective: Cap-and-Trade for Sulfur Dioxide
5-20
Implications for Income Distribution
• Who Benefits?
• Who Bears the Cost?
5-21
Positive Externalities
Researchper year
$
MPB
MC
MEB
MSB = MPB + MEB
R*R1
5-22
A Cautionary Note
• Requests for subsidies– Resource extracted from taxpayers– Market does not always fail
• Policy Perspective: Owner-Occupied Housing