Top Banner
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman
83
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 2: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 3: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Chapter 4: Civil Liberties and Public Policy

• The Bill of Rights• Freedom of Religion• Freedom of Expression• Freedom of Assembly• Right to Bear Arms• Defendants’ Rights• The Right to Privacy• Understanding Civil Liberties• Summary

Page 4: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives

• The Bill of Rights• LO 4.1: Trace the process by which the Bill

of Rights has been applied to the states.

• Freedom of Religion• LO 4.2: Distinguish the two types of

religious rights protected by the First Amendment and determine the boundaries of those rights.

Page 5: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives

• Freedom of Expression• LO 4.3: Differentiate the rights of free

expression protected by the First Amendment and determine the boundaries of those rights.

• Freedom of Assembly• LO 4.4: Describe the rights to assemble and

associate protected by the First Amendment and their limitations.

Page 6: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives

• Right to Bear Arms• LO 4.5: Describe the right to bear arms

protected by the Second Amendment and its limitations.

• Defendants’ Rights• LO 4.6: Characterize defendants’ rights and

identify issues that arise in their implementation.

Page 7: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives

• The Right to Privacy• LO 4.7: Outline the evolution of a right to

privacy and its application to the issue of abortion.

• Understanding Civil Liberties• LO 4.8: Assess how civil liberties affect

democratic government and how they both limit and expand the scope of government.

Page 8: Chapter 4

The Bill of RightsLO 4.1: Trace the process by which the Bill of Rights has been applied to the states.

• The Bill of Rights—Then and Now• The Bill of Rights and the States

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 9: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Bill of Rights

• The Bill of Rights—Then and Now• Civil Liberties – The legal constitutional

protections against the government.• The Bill of Rights – The first 10

amendments, which protect basic liberties, such as religion and speech.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.1

Page 10: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.1

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 11: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Bill of Rights

• The Bill of Rights and the States• Barron v. Baltimore (1833) – The Bill of

Rights restricts only the national government.

• Gitlow v. New York (1925) – 1st Amendment protection of speech first incorporated to states.

• Most now incorporated using the 14th Amendment and restrict state and local governments.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.1

Page 12: Chapter 4

Freedom of ReligionLO 4.2: Distinguish the two types of religious rights protected by the First Amendment and determine the boundaries of those rights.

• The Establishment Clause• The Free Exercise Clause

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 13: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Religion

• The Establishment Clause• No laws shall be made respecting the

establishment of religion.• Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) – Aid to

church related schools must (1) have a secular legislative purpose, (2) neither advance nor inhibit religion, and (3) not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.2

Page 14: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Religion

• The Establishment Clause (cont.)• Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) ruling

that school vouchers are constitutional.• Engel v. Vitale (1962) ruling that prayer in

public schools violates Establishment Clause.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.2

Page 15: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Religion

• The Free Exercise Clause• Prohibits government from interfering with

the practice of religion.• Some religious practices may conflict with

other rights, and then be denied or punished.

• Employment Division v. Smith (1988) upheld prosecution of persons using the drug peyote as part of their religious rituals.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.2

Page 16: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.2

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 17: Chapter 4

Freedom of ExpressionLO 4.3: Differentiate the rights of free expression protected by the First Amendment and determine the boundaries of those rights.

• Prior Restraint• Free Speech and Public Order• Obscenity• Libel and Slander• Symbolic Speech• Free Press and Fair Trials• Commercial Speech• Regulation of the Public Airwaves

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 18: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Prior Restraint• Prior restraint – A government preventing

material from being published.• Near v. Minnesota (1931) ruling that the

1st Amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.

• May be permissible during wartime.• One may be punished after something is

published.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 19: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Free Speech and Public Order• Schenck v. US (1919) – Speech is limited

if it presents a “clear and present danger.”• Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) – It is

permissible to advocate the violent overthrow of government in abstract, but not to incite anyone to imminent lawless action.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 20: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 21: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Obscenity• Roth v. United States (1957) ruling that

obscenity is not constitutionally protected.• Miller v. California (1973) – A

community’s standards can be used to determine obscenity in terms of appealing to a “prurient interest” and being “patently offensive” and lacking in value.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 22: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Libel and Slander• Libel (printed) and slander (spoken) are

false statements that damage one’s reputation.

• New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) ruling that statements about public figures are libelous only if made with reckless disregard for truth.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 23: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Symbolic Speech• Nonverbal communication, such as burning

a flag or wearing an armband.• Texas v. Johnson (1989) – The burning of

the American flag was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 24: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Free Press and Fair Trials• Branzburg v. Hayes (1972) – If no shield

laws, the right of a fair trial preempts reporter’s right to protect sources.

• Zurcher v. Stanford Daily (1978) ruling that a proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper without necessarily violating the 1st Amendment rights to freedom of the press.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 25: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Commercial Speech• Communication in the form of advertising.• The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

decides what kinds of goods may be advertised on radio and television and regulates the content of such advertising.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 26: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Expression

• Regulation of the Public Airwaves• Broadcast stations must follow Federal

Communication Commission rules and regulations.

• United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group (2000) – The regulation must be narrowly tailored to promote a compelling governmental interest.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 27: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 28: Chapter 4

Freedom of AssemblyLO 4.4: Describe the rights to assemble and associate protected by the First Amendment and their limitations.

• Right to Assemble• Right to Associate

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 29: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Assembly

• Right to Assemble• Within reasonable limits, called time, place,

and manner restrictions, freedom of assembly includes the rights to parade, picket, and protest.

• Usually, a group must apply to the local city government for a permit and post a bond of a few hundred dollars.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.4

Page 30: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 31: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Freedom of Assembly

• Right to Associate• Freedom to join groups or associations

without government interference.• NAACP v. Alabama (1958) ruling that the

NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and thus subject its members to harassment.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.4

Page 32: Chapter 4

Right to Bear ArmsLO 4.5: Describe the right to bear arms protected by the Second Amendment and its limitations.

• Restrictions On Owning And Carrying Handguns• Laws have mandated background checks

for gun buyers and limited the sale of certain types of weapons altogether.

• Laws have required that guns be stored in a fashion to prevent their theft or children from accessing and firing them.

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 33: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Right to Bear Arms

• District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)• Right to possess a firearm for self-defense

within the home.• Requiring a firearm in a home to be

disassembled or bound by trigger lock is unconstitutional.

• McDonald v. Chicago (2010)• Extended 2nd Amendment’s limits on

restricting right to bear arms to state and local laws.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.5

Page 34: Chapter 4

Defendants’ RightsLO 4.6: Characterize defendants’ rights and identify issues that arise in their implementation.

• Interpreting Defendants’ Rights• Searches and Seizures• Self-Incrimination• The Right to Counsel• Trials• Cruel and Unusual Punishment

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 35: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 36: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• Interpreting Defendants’ Rights• Criminal justice personnel are limited by

the Bill of Rights and failure to follow constitutional protections may invalidate a conviction.

• Courts continually rule on what is constitutional and what is not.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 37: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• Searches and Seizures• Probable Cause – When the police have reason to

believe that a person should be arrested.• Unreasonable searches and seizures – Evidence

is obtained in a haphazard or random manner, prohibited by 4th Amendment.

• Exclusionary rule – Evidence obtained unconstitutionally can not be introduced into a trial.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 38: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• Searches and Seizures (cont.)• Mapp v. Ohio (1961) – Protection of 4th

Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures extended to the states.

• The War on Terrorism – Patriot Act (2001) allows wiretapping, surveillance, and investigation and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (2008) allows warrants to eavesdrop on groups.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 39: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• Self-Incrimination• When an individual accused of a crime is

compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in court.

• Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruling that sets guidelines for police questioning of accused persons to protect them against self-incrimination and to protect their right to counsel.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 40: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 41: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• The Right to Counsel• Sixth Amendment – The right to counsel,

the right to confront witnesses, and the right to a speedy and public trial.

• Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) – A person accused of a felony where imprisonment may be imposed, however poor he or she might be, has a right to a lawyer.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 42: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• Trials• Plea bargaining – A bargain between the

prosecution and defense for a defendant to plead guilty to a lesser crime; 90 percent of cases end here and do not go to trial

• Juries generally consist of 12 people, but unanimity is not always needed to convict.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 43: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants’ Rights

• Trials (cont.)• The War on Terrorism – Hamdi v.

Rumsfeld (2004) provided detainees the right to challenge their detention before a judge and Boumediene v. Bush (2008) provided foreign terrorism suspects the rights to challenge their detention in U.S. courts.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 44: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 45: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Defendants Rights

• Cruel and Unusual Punishment• The Eighth Amendment forbids cruel and

unusual punishment.• Gregg v. Georgia (1976) – The death

penalty is not cruel and unusual, but it is “an extreme sanction suitable to the most extreme crimes.”

• The death penalty’s use and application varies by state.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 46: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 47: Chapter 4

The Right to PrivacyLO 4.7: Outline the evolution of a right to privacy and its application to the issue of abortion.

• Is There a Right to Privacy?• Controversy over Abortion

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 48: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Right to Privacy

• Is There a Right to Privacy?• The right to a private personal live free

from the intrusion of government.• Griswold v. CT (1965) – Right to privacy is

not explicitly stated in the Constitution, but implied by the 4th and 9th Amendments.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.7

Page 49: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Right to Privacy

• Controversy over Abortion• Roe v. Wade (1973) – Ruling that a state

ban on all abortions was unconstitutional.• Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) –

Ruling that permits considerably more regulation on abortions.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.7

Page 50: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.7

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 51: Chapter 4

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.7

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 52: Chapter 4

Understanding Civil LibertiesLO 4.8: Assess how civil liberties affect democratic government and how they both limit and expand the scope of government.

• Civil Liberties and Democracy• Civil Liberties and the Scope of

Government

To Learning ObjectivesCopyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Page 53: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Understanding Civil Liberties

• Civil Liberties and Democracy• Rights ensured in the Bill of Rights are

essential to democracy.• Courts typically protect civil liberties from

excesses of majority rule.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.8

Page 54: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Understanding Civil Liberties

• Civil Liberties and the Scope of Government• In deciding between liberty and order, the

United States generally chooses liberty.• Civil liberties limit the scope of government

even though government efforts are needed to protect rights.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.8

Page 55: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.1Summary

• The Bill of Rights• Under the incorporation doctrine, most of the

freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights limit the states as well as the national government.

• The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides the basis for this protection of rights.

To Learning Objectives

Page 56: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The legal concept under which the Supreme Court has nationalized the Bill of Rights is the

A. incorporation doctrine

B. establishment doctrine

C. inclusion doctrine

D. Due process clause

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.1

Page 57: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The legal concept under which the Supreme Court has nationalized the Bill of Rights is the

A. incorporation doctrine

B. establishment doctrine

C. inclusion doctrine

D. Due process clause

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.1

Page 58: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.2Summary

• Freedom of Religion• The establishment clause of the 1st

Amendment prohibits government sponsorship of religion, religious exercises, or religious doctrine, but government may support religious-related activities that have a secular purpose if this does not foster excessive entanglement with religion.

To Learning Objectives

Page 59: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.2Summary

• Freedom of Religion (cont.)• The free exercise clause guarantees that

people may hold any religious views they like, but government may at times limit practices related to those views.

To Learning Objectives

Page 60: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Supreme Court can prohibit religious practices

A. it considers inappropriate.

B. so long as it does not specifically target a religion.

C. but not religious beliefs.

D. and beliefs for only certain religions.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.2

Page 61: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

The Supreme Court can prohibit religious practices

A. it considers inappropriate.

B. so long as it does not specifically target a religion.

C. but not religious beliefs.

D. and beliefs for only certain religions.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.2

Page 62: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.3Summary

• Freedom of Expression• Americans enjoy wide protections for

expression, both spoken and written (as in the press), including symbolic and commercial speech.

• Free expression is protected even when it conflicts with other rights, such as the right to a fair trial.

To Learning Objectives

Page 63: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.3Summary

• Freedom of Expression (cont.)• However, the First Amendment does not

protect some expression, such as libel, fraud, obscenity, and incitement to violence, and government has more leeway to regulate expression on the public airwaves.

To Learning Objectives

Page 64: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Court decisions concerning symbolic speech have

A. ruled that it is never protected.

B. extended protections to only some forms of symbolic speech.

C. ruled that symbolic speech is always protected.

D. not directly addressed the matter of symbolic speech.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 65: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Court decisions concerning symbolic speech have

A. ruled that it is never protected.

B. extended protections to only some forms of symbolic speech.

C. ruled that symbolic speech is always protected.

D. not directly addressed the matter of symbolic speech.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.3

Page 66: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.4Summary

• Freedom of Assembly• The 1st Amendment protects the right of

Americans to assemble to make a statement, although time, place, and manner restrictions on parades, picketing and protests are permissible.

• Citizens also have the right to associate with others who share a common interest.

To Learning Objectives

Page 67: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Within reasonable limits, called time, place, and manner restrictions, freedom of assembly includes the rights to

A. parade.

B. picket.

C. Protest.

D. all of the above.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.4

Page 68: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Within reasonable limits, called time, place, and manner restrictions, freedom of assembly includes the rights to

A. parade.

B. picket.

C. Protest.

D. all of the above.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.4

Page 69: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.5Summary

• Right to Bear Arms• Most people have a right to possess firearms

and use them for traditionally lawful purposes.• However, government may limit this right to

certain classes of people, certain areas, and certain weapons, and may require qualifications for purchasing firearms.

To Learning Objectives

Page 70: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court struck down a law that outlawed the possession of handguns in our nation’s .

A. public schools

B. forts

C. capital

D. colleges and universities

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.5

Page 71: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court struck down a law that outlawed the possession of handguns in our nation’s .

A. public schools

B. forts

C. capital

D. colleges and universities

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.5

Page 72: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.6Summary

• Defendants’ Rights• The Bill of Rights provides defendants with

many rights, including protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, self-incrimination, entrapment, and cruel and unusual punishment (although the death penalty is not inherently constitutionally unacceptable).

To Learning Objectives

Page 73: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.6Summary

• Defendants’ Rights (cont.)• Defendants also have a right to be brought

before a judicial officer when arrested, to have the services of counsel, to receive a speedy and fair trial (including by an impartial jury), and to confront witnesses who testify against them.

• They also must be told of their rights.

To Learning Objectives

Page 74: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Each of the following protections is found in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments except

A. the right to counsel.

B. the right to plea bargain.

C. the right to remain silent.

D. all of the above are rights protected in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 75: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Each of the following protections is found in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments except

A. the right to counsel.

B. the right to plea bargain.

C. the right to remain silent.

D. all of the above are rights protected in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.6

Page 76: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.7Summary

• The Right to Privacy• Beginning in the 1960s, the Supreme Court

articulated a right to privacy as implied by the Bill of Rights.

• This right has been applied in various domains and is the basis for a woman’s right to an abortion under most, but not all, circumstances.

To Learning Objectives

Page 77: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

States may not place which of these requirements on the right to an abortion?

A. A 24-hour waiting period.

B. Require parental consent for a minor seeking an abortion.

C. Require married women to tell their husbands of their intent to have an abortion.

D. Require doctors to present women with information on the risks of the operation. To Learning Objectives

LO 4.7

Page 78: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

States may not place which of these requirements on the right to an abortion?

A. A 24-hour waiting period.

B. Require parental consent for a minor seeking an abortion.

C. Require married women to tell their husbands of their intent to have an abortion.

D. Require doctors to present women with information on the risks of the operation. To Learning Objectives

LO 4.7

Page 79: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

LO 4.8Summary

• Understanding Civil Liberties• When any of the Bill of Rights, including

defendants’ rights, conflict with majority rule, rights prevail.

• Civil liberties, by definition, limit the scope of government action, yet substantial government efforts may be necessary to protect the exercise of rights.

To Learning Objectives

Page 80: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

As have expanded, they have also expanded the scope of government.

A. civil liberties

B. the size of courts

C. public polices

D. governments

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.8

Page 81: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

As have expanded, they have also expanded the scope of government.

A. civil liberties

B. the size of courts

C. public polices

D. governments

To Learning Objectives

LO 4.8

Page 82: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Text Credits

• Gallup Poll, July 17-19, 2009. Used with permission.

Page 83: Chapter 4

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

Photo Credits

• 98: Stefan Zakin/Corbis• 107: AP Photos• 112: AP Photos• 118: Getty Images• 119: Jean Yves Rabeuf/The Image Works• 128: By permission of John L. Hart FLP and Creators Syndicate• 127: Michael Newman/PhotoEdit• 131: AP Photos• 139: Mobile Press Register/Corbis