CHAPTER 3 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin 3-1
Dec 19, 2015
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-1
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing the Internal
Environment of the Firm
Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-3 After studying this chapter, you should have a good understanding of:
• The primary and support activities of a firm's value chain.
• How value-chain analysis can help managers create value by investigating internal and external relationships among activities
• The different types of tangible and intangible resources, as well as organizational capabilities
• The four criteria that a firm's resources must possess to maintain a sustainable advantage
• How to make meaningful comparisons of performance across firms
• The value of recognizing how the interests of a variety of stakeholders can be interrelated
Learning Objectives
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-4Firms and Resources
• Why are some firms so successful, and other less so, within very similar environments?
• Why are firms so different from each other?
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-5 The Value Chain:Primary and Support Activities
The Value Chain
General administrationHuman resource management
Technology development
Procurement
Inboundlogistics
Operations Outboundlogistics
Marketing and sales
Service
Margin
Mar
gin
Su
pp
ort
Act
ivit
ies
Primary Activities
Source: Adapted with the permission of The Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., from Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance by Michael E. Porter. Copyright © 1998 by Michael E. Porter.
Exhibit 3.1
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-6 The Value Chain: Some Factors to Consider in Assessing a Firm’s Primary Activities
Source: Adapted with permission of The Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, from Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance by Michael E. Porter. Copyright © 1985, 1998 by Michael E. Porter.
• Location of distribution facilities to minimize shipping times
• Excellent material and inventory control systems
• Efficient plant operations
• Appropriate level of automation
• Quality production control systems to reduce costs and enhance quality
• Efficient plant layout and workflow design
• Effective shipping processes to provide quick delivery
• Efficient finished goods ware-housing processes
• Shipping of goods in large lot sizes to minimize transport-ation costs
• Highly motivated, competent sales force
• Innovative approaches to promotion and advertising
• Selection of appropriate distribution channels
• Customer segments and needs identified
• Effective pricing
•Effective use of procedures to solicit customer feedback and to act on information
•Quick response to customer needs and emergencies
•Ability to furnish replacement parts as required
Inbound Logistics
Operations Outbound Logistics
Marketing and Sales
Service
PR
OF
IT M
AR
GIN
Exhibit 3.2
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-7Value Chain: Support Activities (1)
• General Administration– Effective planning– Excellent relationships
with diverse stakeholders
– Ability to integrate and coordinate value chain activities
– Effective culture and reputation
• Human Resource Management– Effective recruiting,
training, and retention
– Union relationships
– Effective reward and incentive programs
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-8Value Chain: Support Activities (2)
• Technology Development– Effective R&D– Relationships between
R&D and other depts.– Creative and
innovation in culture– Personnel
qualifications
• Procurement
– Win-win relationships with suppliers
– Processes and procedures optimize quality, price, service, speed
– Proper lease versus buy decisions
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-9 The Sustainability of Resources and Capabilities: Four Criteria
• Physically unique
• Path dependency
• Causal ambiguity
• Social complexity`
• No equivalent strategic resources or capabilities
Difficult to imitate
Difficult to substitute
• Not many firms possessRare
• Neutralize threats and exploit opportunities
Valuable
ImplicationsIs the resource or capability
Exhibit 3.6
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-10 Criteria for Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Strategic Implications
Is a Resource…
Source: Adapted from Barney 1991. Firm Resources a Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17:99-120.
Valuable RareDifficult to Imitate
Without Substitutes
Implications for Competitiveness
No No No No Competitive disadvantage
Yes No No No Competitive parity
Yes Yes No No Temporary competitive advantage
Yes Yes Yes Yes Sustainable competitive advantage
Exhibit 3.7
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-11 Tangible Resources
Financial • Firm’s cash account and cash equivalents• Firm’s capacity to raise equity• Firm’s borrowing capacity
Physical • Modern plant and facilities• Favorable manufacturing locations• State-of-the-art machinery and equipment
Technological • Trade secrets• Innovative production processes• Patents, copyrights, trademarks
Organizational
• Effective strategic planning processes• Excellent evaluation and control systems
Source: Adapted from J.B. Barney, 1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 101; R.M. Grant, 1991, Contemporary Strategy Analysis (Cambridge, U.K.: Blackwell Business), 100-102. Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. & Hoskisson, R.E. 2001. Strategic Management: Competitivenesss and Globalization. Fourth Edition. South-Western College Publishing: Cincinnati, Ohio.
Exhibit 3.4(adapted)
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-12 Intangible Resources
Human • Experience and capabilities of employees• Trust• Managerial skills• Firm-specific practices and procedures
Innovation & creativity
• Technical and scientific skills• Innovation capacities
Reputation • Brand name• Reputation with customers for quality and
reliability• Reputation with suppliers for fairness
Exhibit 3.4(adapted)
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-13 Organizational Capabilities
• Competencies or skills employed to transfer inputs to outputs
• The capacity to combine tangible and intangible resources, using organizational processes to attain a desired end
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-14Examples of Organizational Capabilities
• Outstanding customer service
• Excellent product development capabilities
• Innovativeness of products and services
• The ability to hire, motivate, and retain human capital
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-15 Marks & Spencer: How Resources and Capabilities Lead to Advantages
•Lower costs and higher quality of goods sold
•Fewer layers of hierarchy
Capabilities
•Customer recognition with minimal advertising No promotional sales
•Lower labor turnover 8.7% labor costs versus 10%-20% industry average
Intangible
•1% of revenues allocated to occupancy costs (versus 3% to 9% industry average)
Tangible
Competitive Advantages in Great Britain
Resource
Ownership (vs. leasing) of property
Brand reputation
Employee loyalty
Supplier chain
Managerial judgment
Source: Adapted from Collins, D. & Montgomery, C. 1995. Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4): 123.
Exhibit 3.5
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-16 Firm Performance: Financial Ratios
LiquidityLiquidity
Long-term solvencyLong-term solvency
Asset managementAsset management
ProfitabilityProfitability
Market valueMarket value
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-17 Performance: Bases for Comparison
• Historical comparisonsHistorical comparisons
• Industry normsIndustry norms
• Key competitors or strategic groupKey competitors or strategic group
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-18 Historical Trends: ROS for a Hypothetical Company
20%
10%
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Ret
urn
n S
ales
Years 1, 2, 3
Years 4, 5, 6
Years 6, 7, 8 Years 8, 9, 10
Years 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Year
Exhibit 3.8
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-19 How Financial Ratios Differ Across Industries
Financial RatioSemi-
conductorsGrocery Stores
Skilled nursing facilities
Quick ratio (times) 1.5 0.5 1.1
Current ratio (times) 3.2 1.6 1.9
Total liabilities to net worth (%) 34.8 114.0 93.0
Collection period (days) 54.8 2.9 40.2
Assets to sales (%) 98.1 21.2 108.7
Return on sales (%) 3.1 0.9 2.0
Source: Dun & Bradstreet, Industry Norms and Key Business Ratios, 1999-2000. Desktop Edition. SIC # 0100-8999.
Exhibit 3.9
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-20 Comparison of Procter & Gamble’s Sales and R&D Budget to its Key Competitors
COMPANY (OR DIVISION)
SALES*
(billions)
R&D BUDGET
(billions)
P&G DRUG DIVISION $0.8 $0.38
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB $20.2 $1.8
PFIZER $27.4 $4.0
MERCK $32.7 $2.1
* Most recently completed fiscal year. Data: Lehman Brother Procter & Gamble Co.
Exhibit 3.10
Source: Berner, R. 2000. Procter & Gamble: Just say no to drugs. Business Week: October 9:128.
CHAPTER 3STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess and G. T. Lumpkin
3-21 ECI’s Balanced Business ScorecardExhibit 3.11
Financial Perspective
GOALS MEASURES
• Survive • Cash Flow
• Succeed • Quarterly sales growth and
operating income by division
• Prosper • Increased market share and ROE
Customer Perspective
GOALS MEASURES
• New products • Percent of sales from new products
• Responsive supply • On-time delivery (defined by customer)
• Customer partnership
• Number of cooperative engineering efforts
Source: Adapted from Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. 1992. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 69(1): 71-79.
Internal Business Perspective
GOALS MEASURES
• Manufacturing excellence • Cycle time• Unit cost• Yield
• Design productivity • Silicon efficiency• Engineering efficiency
• New product introduction • Actual introduction schedule versus plan
Innovation and Learning Perspective
GOALS MEASURES
• Technology leadership • Time to develop next generation
• Manufacturing learning • Process time to maturity
• Product focus • Percent of products that equal 80% sales
• Time to market • New product introduction versus competition