Top Banner
Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion
26

Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Rodney Marshall
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

Chapter 3Numerically Summarizing

Data

3.2

Measures of Dispersion

Page 2: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

To order food at a McDonald’s Restaurant, one must choose from multiple lines, while at Wendy’s Restaurant, one enters a single line. The following data represent the wait time (in minutes) in line for a simple random sample of 30 customers at each restaurant during the lunch hour. For each sample, answer the following:

(a) What was the mean wait time?

(b) Draw a histogram of each restaurant’s wait time.

(c ) Which restaurant’s wait time appears more dispersed? Which line would you prefer to wait in? Why?

Page 3: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

1.50 0.79 1.01 1.66 0.94 0.672.53 1.20 1.46 0.89 0.95 0.901.88 2.94 1.40 1.33 1.20 0.843.99 1.90 1.00 1.54 0.99 0.350.90 1.23 0.92 1.09 1.72 2.00

3.50 0.00 0.38 0.43 1.82 3.040.00 0.26 0.14 0.60 2.33 2.541.97 0.71 2.22 4.54 0.80 0.500.00 0.28 0.44 1.38 0.92 1.173.08 2.75 0.36 3.10 2.19 0.23

Wait Time at Wendy’s

Wait Time at McDonald’s

Page 4: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

The mean wait time in each line is 1.39 minutes.

Page 5: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.
Page 6: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

The range, R, of a variable is the difference between the largest data value and the smallest data values. That is

Range = R = Largest Data Value – Smallest Data Value

Page 7: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Finding the Range of a Set of Data

Find the range of the student data collected from Section 3.1

Page 8: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

The population variance of a variable is the sum of squared deviations about the population mean divided by the number of observations in the population, N.

That is it is the arithmetic mean of the sum of the squared deviations about the population mean.

Page 9: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

The population variance is symbolically represented by lower case Greek sigma squared.

Note: When using the above formula, do not round until the last computation. Use as many decimals as allowed by your calculator in order to avoid round off errors.

Page 10: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Computing a Population Variance

Compute the population variance of the population data collected in Section 3.1.

Page 11: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

The sample variance is computed by determining the sum of squared deviations about the sample mean and then dividing this result by n – 1.

Page 12: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

Note: Whenever a statistic consistently overestimates or underestimates a parameter, it is called biased. To obtain an unbiased estimate of the population variance, we divide the sum of the squared deviations about the mean by n - 1.

Page 13: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Computing a Sample Variance

Compute the sample variance using the sample data from Section 3.1

Page 14: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

The population standard deviation is denoted by

It is obtained by taking the square root of the population variance, so that

Page 15: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Computing a Population Standard Deviation and Sample Standard Deviation

Compute the population and sample standard deviation for the data obtained in Section 3.1

Page 16: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Comparing Standard Deviations

Determine the standard deviation waiting time for Wendy’s and McDonald’s. Which is larger? Why?

Page 17: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Comparing Standard Deviations

Determine the standard deviation waiting time for Wendy’s and McDonald’s. Which is larger? Why?

Sample standard deviation for Wendy’s:

0.738 minutes

Sample standard deviation for McDonald’s:

1.265 minutes

Page 18: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.
Page 19: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.
Page 20: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Using the Empirical Rule

The following data represent the serum HDL cholesterol of the 54 female patients of a family doctor.

41 48 43 38 35 37 44 44 4462 75 77 58 82 39 85 55 5467 69 69 70 65 72 74 74 7460 60 60 61 62 63 64 64 6454 54 55 56 56 56 57 58 5945 47 47 48 48 50 52 52 53

Page 21: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

(a) Compute the population mean and standard deviation.

(b) Draw a histogram to verify the data is bell-shaped.

(c) Determine the percentage of patients that have serum HDL within 3 standard deviations of the mean according to the Empirical Rule.

(d) Determine the percentage of patients that have serum HDL between 33.8 and 81 according to the Empirical Rule. (e) Determine the actual percentage of patients that have serum HDL between 33.8 and 81.

Page 22: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

(a) Using a TI83 plus graphing calculator, we find

(b)

57.4 and 11.8

Page 23: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

(c) According to the Empirical Rule, approximately 99.7% of the patients will have serum HDL cholesterol levels within 3 standard deviations of the mean. That is, approximately 99.7% of the patients will have serum HDL cholesterol levels greater than or equal to 57.4 - 3(11.8) = 22 and less than or equal to 57.4 + 3(11.8) = 92.8.

57.4 and 11.8

Page 24: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

(d) Because 33.8 is 2 standard deviations below the mean (57.4 - 2(11.8) = 33.8) and 81 is 2 standard deviations above the mean (57.4 + 2(11.8) = 81), the Empirical Rule states that approximately 95% of the data will lie between 33.8 and 81.

(e) There are no observations below 33.8. There are 2 observations greater than 81. Therefore, 52/54 = 96.3% of the data lie between 33.8 and 81.

57.4 and 11.8

Page 25: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.
Page 26: Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data 3.2 Measures of Dispersion.

EXAMPLE Using Chebyshev’s Theorem

Using the data from the previous example, use Chebyshev’s Theorem to

(a) determine the percentage of patients that have serum HDL within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

(b) determine the percentage of patients that have serum HDL between 33.8 and 81.