Top Banner
24

Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

Apr 10, 2015

Download

Documents

kuitang

Kagan, Donald, Steven Ozment, and Frank M. Turner. The Western Heritage, AP 9th Edition.

MORE NOTES at the repository at http://supernova.dyndns.org/csmfoc/
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and theChallenges of Reform (1815�1832)De ember 30, 2007The Congress of Vienna established onservatism through ooperation and onsultation, maintaining pea e. They maintained monar hy and aristo ra y.Two riti isms hallenged this order. Nationalists wished to shape nations a - ording to nationalities or ethni groups. Liberals sought reform and freer mar-kets. Latin Ameri an olonies e�orts to gain independen e threatened the order.For the �rst �fteen years, onservatism was su essful ex ept for Latin Amer-i a. But strong hallenge materialized late with the 1830 Fren h Revolution and1832 reform bill in Parliament. Eastern and entral Europe ontinued to resist hange.Contents1 The Challenges of Nationalism and Liberalism 21.1 The Emergen e of Nationalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.1.1 Nationalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.1.2 Opposition to the Vienna Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.1.3 Creating Nations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.1.4 Meaning of Nationhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.1.5 Regions of Nationalisti Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41.2 Early-Nineteenth-Century Politi al Liberalism . . . . . . . . . . . 41.2.1 Politi al Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51.2.2 E onomi Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51.2.3 Relationship of Nationalism to Liberalism . . . . . . . . . 62 Conservative Governments: The Domesti Politi al Order 62.1 Conservative Outlooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.2 Liberalism and Nationalism Resisted in Austria and the Germanies 72.2.1 Dynasti Integrity of the Habsburg Empire . . . . . . . . 72.2.2 Defeat of Prussian Reform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.2.3 Student Nationalism and the Carlsbad De rees . . . . . . 72.3 Postwar Repression in Great Britain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.3.1 Lord Liverpool's Ministry and Popular Unrest . . . . . . 81

Page 2: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

2.3.2 �Peterloo� and the Six A ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.4 Bourbon Restoration in Fran e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92.4.1 The Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92.4.2 Ultraroyalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 The Conservative International Order 103.1 The Congress System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.2 The Spanish Revolution of 1820 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103.3 Revolt Against Ottoman Rule in the Balkans . . . . . . . . . . . 113.3.1 The Greek Revolution of 1821 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113.3.2 Serbian Independen e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 The Wars of Independen e in Latin Ameri a 124.1 Revolution in Haiti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134.2 Wars of Independen e on the South Ameri an Continent . . . . . 134.2.1 Creole Dis ontent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144.2.2 San Martín in Río de la Plata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144.2.3 Simon Bolívar's Liberation of Venezuela . . . . . . . . . . 154.3 Independen e in New Spain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154.4 Brazilian Independen e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 The Conservative Order Shaken in Europe 165.1 Russia: The De embrist Revolt of 1825 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165.1.1 Unrest in the Army . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.1.2 Dynasti Crisis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.1.3 The Auto ra y of Ni holas 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185.1.4 O� ial Nationality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185.1.5 Revolt and Repression in Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185.2 Revolution in Fran e (1830) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.2.1 The Rea tionary Poli ies of Charles 10 . . . . . . . . . . . 195.2.2 The July Revolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195.2.3 Monar hy under Louis Philippe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205.3 Belgium Be omes Independent (1830) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.4 The Great Reform Bill in Britain (1832) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.4.1 Politi al and E onomi Reform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215.4.2 Catholi Eman ipation A t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225.4.3 Legislating Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 In Perspe tive 23A AP Test Prep 231 The Challenges of Nationalism and Liberalism1. Age of �isms:� nationalism, liberalism, republi anism, so ialism, ommu-nism. 2

Page 3: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

2. Be areful not to let words obstru t thought.1.1 The Emergen e of Nationalism1.1.1 Nationalism1. Single most powerful ideology 19th/20th.2. Modern on ept: politi al boundary = ethni boundary.3. Came during late 18th/early 19th.1.1.2 Opposition to the Vienna Settlement1. Vienna held monar hies/dynasties, not ethni ity basis for unity.2. Oppose multinational and people of same ethni ity in di�erent states (Ger-many).3. Underlie: popular sovereignty�people determine nation, not monar h.(But not always).4. Minorities oppressed: majority govern them without onsent. Also, major-ity aspired to govern those of their ethni ity in regions where nationalismwas not strong.1.1.3 Creating Nations1. Elites spread nationalism through print.(a) Historian hroni le people's past;(b) Writers/s holars establish national literature by anthologizing2. S hooltea hers spread: tea h national language, history.3. Fran e, Italy: o� ial national language supplant lo al diale t.4. S andinavia/E. Europe: attempt resurre t �purer� versions of nationallanguages. Often basi ally invent → more linguisti uniformity.5. Yet even in 1850, ≤ 1

2Fren h people spoke o� ial Fren h.6. Print ulture �xed language more e�e tively than spoken.7. Pro� ien y of o� ial language → so ial, politi al advan ement.8. Uniform language persuaded people they were part of a nation.

3

Page 4: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

1.1.4 Meaning of Nationhood1. Unify (Italy, Germany): eliminate/federate dynasti states. E onomi ,administrative e� ien y.2. Resemble individuals: personal talent, shape own destiny.3. Creation of God: like biologi al spe imens.4. Pla e in divine order. Poland: su�ering Christ → imply resurre tion.5. Whi h ethi group be nation? Theory any. . . pra ti e:(a) Large enough to support viable e on.(b) Signi� ant ultural history.( ) Cultural elite to spread national language.(d) Military to onquer/establish/prote t independen e.6. Many smaller groups la ked military → no independen e but aused do-mesti unrest.1.1.5 Regions of Nationalisti PressureChallenge SQUO is 6 areas:1. England subsume Ireland 1800.(a) Irish want independen e/more self-governan e.(b) �Irish problem��haunt Britain for two enturies.2. Germany: unify German-speakers; hallenger Austria; pit Austria againstPrussia.3. Italy: unify Italian-speakers; drive out Austrians.4. Poland: restore independen e, get rid of Russians.5. E. Europe: Hungarians, Cze hs, Slovenes, others sought independen e/formalre ognition within Austria.6. S.E. Europe, Balkan: independen e from Ottoman and Russian.1.2 Early-Nineteenth-Century Politi al LiberalismPresent-day Ameri ans think of 19th entury liberals as more onservative thanreally.4

Page 5: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

1.2.1 Politi al Goals1. From E., DRMC.2. Limit arbitrary power of government.3. Legitima y from onsent of governed.4. Ele ted representatives/parliamentary bodies.5. Ministers answer to representative, not monar h.6. Constitution.7. Limited but good onstitutional government nowhere. Even Britain min-isters equally answer to monar h.8. Conservative suspi ious of onstitution�Fren h. No written onstitutionembody wisdom of running state.9. Liberals edu ated, wealthy, a ademi s, professional/ ommer ial, but ex- luded politi ally.(a) Felt ex lusion unjusti�ed.10. No demo ra y. Extend representation to propertied lasses.11. Hated poor; transform system into wealth-based privilege instead of birth.1.2.2 E onomi Goals1. Free trade.2. Oppose paternalisti regulation/guilds. Labor is ommodity to be freelytraded.3. Di�erent programs in di�erent pla es.(a) Britain: already limited monar hy. Parliamentary reform. Industrialrevolution already in pla e.(b) Fran e: Napoleoni Code. Appeal to �prin iples of 1789.� LikeBritain, expand ele torate w/o demo ra y.( ) Germany/Austria: sti� resistan e to liberalism → less dire t politi- al in�uen e. Sharp divide between aristo ra y (in bureau ra y ando� er orps) and small bourgeoisie. No strong tradition of liberty:freedom = moral onformity. Tolerated strong state: it was vehi- le for uni� ation. But states didn't ooperate → seek more modestgoals: lower trade barriers. 5

Page 6: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

1.2.3 Relationship of Nationalism to Liberalism1. Not ne essarily/logi ally linked. In fa t, often opposed.2. Some nationalists want their nation to dominate.3. Conservative nationalists want nation, but no liberal institution.4. Often ompatible: nationalists promote representative government, ivilliberty, e onomi freedom. Gain support of liberals who may not sharetheir nationalism.5. Symbols: Greek nationalists make Athens apital → reveren e of En-glish/Fren h liberals.2 Conservative Governments: The Domesti Po-liti al OrderIn�uen e lasted until WW1.2.1 Conservative Outlooks1. Legitimate monar hy, landed aristo ra y, established hur h.2. Self- ons ious allian e new. Fren h Revolution allied them.3. �Arti ulated outlook and set of ooperating institutions was as new a fea-ture on the politi al lands ape as nationalism and liberalism� (662).4. Theorists: Burke & Hegel.5. Attitudes from Louis's exe ution:(a) Monar hy only trust A./A. allied with B.(b) A. believe no representative government prote t their interests.( ) Reje t onstitutions unless they wrote it themselves.(d) Chur h distrust popular movements. Saw themselves as edu ators ofSQUO.(e) Chur h hate E.: riti al spirit; undermine revealed religion.6. Saw selves as surrounded by enemy; one revolution spill into another.7. War distra ted politi s and fueled e onomy. But with pea e, itizens raisenew issues.(a) Unemployment.(b) Conservatives resorted to repression.6

Page 7: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

2.2 Liberalism and Nationalism Resisted in Austria andthe GermaniesMetterni h (1773�1859) epitomize onservatism. Seemed to ontrol Europeanrea tion.2.2.1 Dynasti Integrity of the Habsburg Empire1. Most dangerous to Austria�had Germans, Poles, Cze hs, Slovaks, Slovenes,Italians, Croats, others, lient governments in Italy.2. Re ognize any → demise of empire.3. Had to dominate German Confederation to pre lude new state that absorbGerman heart of Austria.(a) Created at Vienna; repla ed HRE.(b) 39 states under Austrian leadership. Ea h mostly autonomous. . .2.2.2 Defeat of Prussian Reform1. 1815�Frederi k William 3 promised onstitution; stalled and reneged.2. Created e� ient Coun il of State�answered to him alone.3. 1819�Repla e reformist ministers with hardened onservatives after quar-rel about army organization.4. 1823�Establish 8 Diets�relink monar hy, army, aristo ra y.2.2.3 Student Nationalism and the Carlsbad De rees1. 3 German states (Baden, Bavaria, Württemberg) granted onstitutions.(a) None re ognized pop. sovereignty;(b) All de�ne rights as gift of monar h.2. University students read nationalism; fought or friends fought Napoleon.Dreamed United Germany.3. Burs henshaften�student asso iations; repla e provin ial loyalty with uni-�ed state loyalty. Often anti-Semiti .4. 1817, Jena�organize 4th anniversary of Leipzig, 300th of 95 Theses. Un-eased rulers: lubs in luded some republi ans.5. Karl Sand (B. member) assassinate onservative playwright August vonKotzebue who ridi uled B.(a) Tried, publi exe ution → nationalist martyr.7

Page 8: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

(b) Metterni h used this to justify suppression liberalism institutions.6. Jul. 1819�Carlsbad De rees dissolved B. Also provided ensorship.7. Final A t�limited subje ts onstitutional hambers of Baden, Bavaria,Württemberg ould dis uss. Assert right of monar h to resist onstitu-tional demands. Se ret poli e harass dissidents (anyone seeking moderate hange).2.3 Postwar Repression in Great Britain.1819�20 high tide to onservatism in�uen e and oppression. Poor harvest andunemployment in Britain.2.3.1 Lord Liverpool's Ministry and Popular Unrest1. Prote t interest of landed and wealthy.2. 1815�Corn Law high pri e for domesti grain; duties of foreign.3. Repla e in ome tax (only wealthy) with ex ise (all) pay.4. Ruling lass abandon traditional paternal prote tion of poor.5. 1799�Combination A t outlaw unions.6. Lower lasses demand hange.(a) Reform lubs.(b) Radi al newspapers: Cobbett's Politi al Registrar�demand hange.7. Government saw leaders as demagogues�images of sans- ulottes.(a) Cobbett, Major John Cartwright, Henry �Orator� Hunt.8. De . 1816�mass meeting at Spa Fields → ex use to pass Coer ion A tsof Mar. 1817�suspend habeas orpus ; extend sedition laws.2.3.2 �Peterloo� and the Six A tsCalmed politi s until 1819.1. 16 Aug. 1819�meeting in Man hester at St. Peter's Fields.2. Royal troops and militia stationed. Magistrate ordered militia to step in;11 died; s ores injured.3. Radi al leaders arrested.4. De . 1819 passed the Six A ts: 8

Page 9: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

(a) Forbade large unauthorized publi meetings;(b) Raise �ne for seditious libel;( ) Sped trials for politi als;(d) In reased newspaper tax;(e) Prohibit training or armed groups;(f) Allow lo al o� ials to sear h homes.5. Cato Street Conspira y: Arthur Thistlewood led plot to blow up abinet.Foiled; men hanged. Dis redited Parliamentary reform movement.2.4 Bourbon Restoration in Fran eLouis 18 brother of Louis 16. Son of Louis died in prison (regarded as Louis 17).Realist during exile; a epted onstitutional monar hy with his own onstitution alled the Charter.2.4.1 The Charter1. Hereditary monar hy; bi ameral legislature.2. Monar hy appoint upper Chamber of Peers (like House of Lords);3. Elites ele t Chamber of Deputies.4. Guarantee DRMC.5. Toleration with Catholi ism o� ial.6. No hallenge property SQUO ( on�s ated from Chur h ould keep).2.4.2 Ultraroyalism1. Royalists didn't like Louis 18's moderate.2. Led by Louis' brother/heir Count of Artois. More royalist than King;demand revenge.(a) Exe uted White Terror�King powerless to stop.(b) Sentiment in Chamber of Deputies.3. So dangerous, King dissolved hamber. Se ond ele tion return moderatemajority.4. Feb. 1820�persuaded Louis 18 Duke of Berri (son of Count of Artois)murder was by liberals. King responded repressively:(a) Wealthy ele tors got two votes.9

Page 10: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

(b) Press ensorship.( ) Suspe ts of dangerous a tivity easily arrested.(d) Put se ondary edu ation under bishops.(e) Revealed ontradi tion of restoration: onstitution was façade; liber-alism nearly illegal.3 The Conservative International Order1. Major powers (Ru/Aus/Prussia, Britain) onsult periodi ally.2. At �rst, post-war ongresses. Later, as di�eren es arose, more informal.3. Con ert of Europe�resolve mutual FX poli y. Prevent major unilaterala tion.(a) Initial goal: maintain balan e of power against Fran e, Russia.(b) Long-term goal: maintain pea e�novel European idea.( ) Genuine new step to regulate IR.3.1 The Congress System1. First years, ongress of ooperation/ onsultation worked well.2. 1st: 1818 Aix-la-Chapelle. Powers removed troops from Fran e. Fran epaid reparations; readmitted to good standing.3. Alexander 1: Quadruple Allian e uphold existing borders. Castlereaghreje t�Quadruple Allian e only prevent future Fren h aggression.3.2 The Spanish Revolution of 18201. Bourbon Ferdinand 8 after Napoleon.2. Promise Constitution; renege. Dissolve Cortés; auto rati .3. 1820�army o� ers sent to suppress olonial revolution rebelled.4. Naples: king of Two Si ilies a ept onstitution.5. Frighten Metterni h�Austria want Italy for bu�er for S. �ank.(a) Britain oppose intervention in Italy or Spain.(b) Metterni h turn to Holy Allian e. With uno� ial British and Fren hdelegates, formCongress of Troppau and issueProto ol of Trop-pau.i. Stable governments intervene in revolution ountry.10

Page 11: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

ii. Congress of Laiba h�Austrian troops restore absolutism inNaples.iii. Metterni h attempt in rease e� ien y and popular support.6. 1822 Congress of Verona��nal postwar ongress. Solve Spain.(a) Britain oppose joint a tion; Castlereagh sui ide and Canning newminister. Less supportive of Metterni h. Britain withdrew from Con-tinental a�airs.(b) A/P/Russia support Fren h intervention in Spain.( ) 1823�Fren h suppress revolution; remain until 1827.7. Not aggression; did not use intervention as ex use. Preserve onservativeorder. Contrast to 18th- entury wars/Napoleon.(a) Restraint through onsult prevent major war among powers untilmid- entury; general on�i t until 1914.8. Canning's (new FX minister) ommer ialism: exploit Ameri an revolutionto break Spanish monopoly.(a) Supported 1823 Monroe Do trine.(b) British ommer e dominate Latin Ameri a. Brought Jenkins's Yearto su ess.3.3 Revolt Against Ottoman Rule in the Balkans3.3.1 The Greek Revolution of 18211. One of most famous: attra ted support/parti ipation of writers. ImagineGreek demo ra y reborn.2. Philhelleni so iety nearly every major ountry.3. Enlightenment: W. European liberal freedom vs. Asian despotism.4. Ottoman didn't hange politi ally or e onomi ally; weak and unstable.5. �The Eastern Question:� What Europe do to ensure Ottoman stability?(a) Powers interested in Mediterranean territories. R/Austria want Balkanland.(b) Fran e/Britain on ern w/ ommer e & naval ontrol.( ) Treatment of Christians/a ess to Holy Land.(d) Didn't want to strengthen empire → sympatheti to nationalism,even though goals on�i t.(e) Con�i t and distrust prevent intervention.11

Page 12: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

(f) 1827 Treaty of London demand Turkish re ognition of Greek in-dependen e; sent �eet to aid revolt.(g) 1828 Russia sent troop to Romania (Ottoman holding). Control in1829Treaty of Adrianople. Also let Britain, Fran e, Russia de ideGreek future.(h) 1830 Treaty of London de lare independent Gree e. Otto I (r.1832�62) of Bavaria hosen �rst king of Greek kingdom.3.3.2 Serbian Independen e1. Sin e late 18th, sought independen e.2. 1804�13 Kara George led guerrilla war against Ottoman.(a) Unsu essful;(b) Built self-identity; attra t interest of powers.3. 1815�6 Milos Obrenovit h negotiated administrative autonomy for someterritory, but most Serbs lived outside jurisdi tion.4. 1830 Sultan grant independen e; later, powers re ognize.5. Sought additional territory → big problem with Austria.6. 1820s�Russia (Slav, Orthodox state) be ame formal prote tor. 1856� olle tive prote torship of powers; spe ial relationship with Russia on-tinue and impa t WW1.4 The Wars of Independen e in Latin Ameri a1. Napoleon spark independen e movements.2. 1804�24:(a) Fran e lose Haiti;(b) Portugal lose Brazil;( ) Spain lose everything but Cuba and Puerto Ri o.3. End 3 enturies of Iberian rule and exploitation.12

Page 13: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

4.1 Revolution in Haiti1. 1791�1804 � Independen e.(a) Sparked by over�ow of Fren h Revolution poli ies.(b) Slaves ould revolt against White masters/mulatto freemen. Terrifyslaveholders.2. 1791�NA de lare mulatto freemen same rights as white. Colonial Assem-bly resist.3. 1791�slave rebellion from se ret onspira y; Toussaint L'Ouverture, for-mer slave, leader.(a) Violen e and bloodshed on both sides.(b) Collapsed, but free bla ks hoped to gain promised rights. Armsagainst whites; ba ked by revolutionary Fren h o� ials.4. 1793�Abolish slavery.5. Spain, Britain attempt intervene�opposed to end slavery; wanted ri hsugar lands.6. Toussaint support Fren h against Spanish and British; dominate His-panola by 1800.(a) Authoritarian onstitution, Governor-General for life, ties with Fran e.(b) Napoleon distrust; fear undermine Fren h authority.( ) 1802�Napoleon send army to apture L'Ouverture; died in Fren hprison 1803.7. Other ex-slave leaders�Dessalines�resist. Napoleon abandoned Amer-i an empire. Re ognize independen e 1804; �rst su essful assault on olonial rule.4.2 Wars of Independen e on the South Ameri an Conti-nent1. Haiti was ex eption. Generally Creole elite led revolutions. Feel non-whites were involved in/bene�ted from end of Iberian rule. Creoles didnot want to lose so ial privileges.13

Page 14: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

4.2.1 Creole Dis ontent1. Want free trade with N. Ameri a and Europe. Regulations that bene�tCreoles, not Spain.2. Resent in reases in Spanish tax.3. Resented peninsulare advantages: politi al patronage for government, hur h,army. Took best positions.4. Read E. Required revolutionary examples to lead revolution: Napoleoninvasion of Portugal and appointment of his brother on Spanish throne.(a) Portuguese royal family �ee to Brazil; establish government.(b) Bourbon Spain overthrown → va uum.5. Fear Napoleoni monar hy impose reforms and harm interests and drainwealth.6. 1808�10�juntas�politi al ommittees laim right to govern.(a) Lied they rule in name of deposed Bourbon Ferdinand 7.(b) Spain never reestablished authority.( ) Juntas ended peninsulare privileges, who always depended on rown.4.2.2 San Martín in Río de la Plata1. Size, geographi al barriers, regional di�eren es, absen e of integrated e on-omy → many di�erent paths.2. Buenos Aires: 1806, fought British invasion. Prote t selves rather thanrely on Spain.3. 1810 junta get rid of Spanish rule; sent armies into Paraguay, Uruguay toliberate.(a) Armies defeated but Spain lost ontrol.(b) Paraguay independent; Brazil took Uruguay.4. Determined to liberate Peru�stronghold of royalist power and liberty.5. 1817 José de San Martín, leading general of Río de la Plata for es, leadarmy to Santiago in Chile over Andes.(a) Bernardo O'Higgins, Chilean independen e leader, di tator.(b) From Santiago, organize �eet; go to Peru by sea 1820.6. San Martín drove royalists out of Lima; be ame Prote tor of Peru.14

Page 15: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

4.2.3 Simon Bolívar's Liberation of Venezuela1. Bolívar similar to San Martín; operated in North.2. Liberating junta in 1810�independent republi in Car as.3. 1811�14 ivil war: royalists, slaves and Ilaneros (Venezuelan owboys) hallenge republi .(a) Bolívar exiled to Colombia, Jamai a.(b) 1816 � Haiti helped him return to ontinent.i. Capture Bogotá, apital of New Granada (modern Colombia,Bolivia, E uador) to se ure base of atta k on Venezuela.ii. 1821 � apture Car as; named president.4. 1822 � Bolívar and San Martín's armies join to liberate Quito, apital ofmodern E uador.5. Meeting in Guayaquil � disagree about future politi al stru ture.(a) San Martín: monar hy; Bolívar: republi .(b) San Martín quietly retire and exile in Europe.( ) Bolívar deliberately let Peru fall to anar hy, then invade in 1823.(d) 9 De . 1824 Battle of Aya u ho � liberation army defeat Spanishroyalists; end Spanish South Ameri an empire.4.3 Independen e in New Spain1. In lude Mexi o, Texas, California, SW US. Conservative out ome of rev-olution.2. 1808 organize junta. Before it did anything, Creole priest Hidalgo y Cos-tilla all for Indian rebellion 1810 in his parish. They and bla ks re-sponded.(a) Hidalgo set reform, hinting landholding hange.(b) 80,000 followers; apture ities and mar h to Mexi o City.( ) Hidalgo's for e and royalists many atro ities.(d) 1811 � aptured; exe uted.3. Leadership go to mestizo (Indian or Bla k ×White) Morelos y Pavón�farmore radi al; end for ed labor and substantial land reform. Exe uted in1815.4. Popular uprising and demand for reform unite onservatives, both Creoleand Spanish. 15

Page 16: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

(a) No diminish privilege.(b) 1820 � new hallenge. Revolution in Fran e for e Ferdinand 7 toa ept liberal onstitution.( ) Fear liberal monar hy impose reforms on Mexi o.(d) Royalist Augustín de Iturbide de lare onservative independent Mex-i o 1821. De lared emperor; regime did not last long.4.4 Brazilian Independen e1. Simple and pea eful.2. Rio de Janeiro royal ity after rown �ed there.3. Prin e regent João address omplaints. Expanded trade.4. 1815 made Brazil kingdom. Overdue: Brazil larger and more prosperousthan Portugal.5. 1820 revolution: demand João return to Lisbon, return to olonial status.(a) Left son Dom Pedro as regent; en ouraged him to be sympatheti toBrazilian aspirations.(b) 1822 embra e Brazilian independen e.( ) Be ame emperor on independent Brazil; remained monar hy underson Dom Pedro 2 until 1889.6. Elites want to avoid Spanish wars' destru tion.7. Leaders wanted to preserve slavery. Wars of independen e led to abolition.5 The Conservative Order Shaken in Europe1. Two ex eptions to onservative order�Greek Revolution, Latin Ameri ao ur in periphery.2. Mid-1820s�Russia, Fran e, Great Britain fa e domesti dis ontent. Rus-sia: suppression; Fran e: revolution; Britain: a ommodation. Indepen-dent Belgium.5.1 Russia: The De embrist Revolt of 1825Lead in suppressing liberalism and nationalism. No hallenge to auto ra y untilhis death.16

Page 17: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

5.1.1 Unrest in the Army1. Russian o� ers exposed to E. by o upying Fran e.(a) Realized ba kwardness of Russia → reformist sympathy.(b) Se ret so ieties.i. Southern So iety led by Pestel advo ate representative gov-ernment, abolish serfdom. Limited independen e for Poland,demo ra y.ii. Northern So iety moderate; onstitutional monar hy, abolishserfdom, prote t aristo ra y.2. During 1825, wanted oup d'état in 1826.5.1.2 Dynasti Crisis1. 1825 � Alexander 1 died unexpe tedly.(a) No dire t heir.(b) Brother Constantine, next in line, married non-royal woman anddidn't want throne.( ) Se ret instru tions named younger brother Ni holas (r. 1825�55)tsar.2. Constantine a knowledged Ni holas tsar and vi e versa. For three weeks,Russia no ruler.3. De ember: army told Ni holas about onspira y. Ni holas took throne.4. Jr. o� ers plotted to rally troops under their ommand for reform.5. 26 De . 1825 � army take oath of allegian e to Ni holas�less popularthan Constantine and seen as more onservative.(a) Mos ow regiment did not take oath.(b) Mar h into St. Petersburg Senate Square; demand onstitution andConstantine as tsar.( ) Pea e settlement fail;(d) Ni holas order avalry and artillery to atta k. > 60 died.(e) 1826, Ni holas presided over ommission to investigate De embristRevolt and se ret so ieties.i. Exe uted 5ii. Exiled > 100.6. Revolt total failure but �rst rebellion with spe i� goals. Martyrdomsymbolize yearnings of liberals. 17

Page 18: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

5.1.3 The Auto ra y of Ni holas 11. Not ignorant or bigoted rea tionary.2. Know growth and improvement required hange but afraid of it.3. Abolish serfdom → undermine support of nobility.4. Literary, politi al ensorship; surveillan e by se ret poli e.5. Little attempt for e� ient and honest administration.6. Only reform was odi� ation of law 1833.5.1.4 O� ial Nationality1. Count S.S. Uvarov presided over program. Substitute for reform.2. �Orthodoxy, Auto ra y, Nationalism.�3. Chur h arm of se ular government; ontrolled s hools.4. Young Russians taught to a ept status; reje t so ial mobility.5. Writers: only under auto ra y of Peter, Catherine, Alexander 1 did Russiaprosper and in�uen e world.6. See Russian ulture as wisdom separating them from immoral West. Alien-ate intelle tuals from government.5.1.5 Revolt and Repression in Poland1. Most of Poland under Russian rule after Vienna but had onstitutionalgovernment with parliament (diet) with limited powers.2. Constantine ran Polish government.3. 1830 � News of Fren h and Belgian revolutions.(a) Warsaw insurre tion; spread through ountry.(b) De . 18 � Polish diet de lare revolution nationalist movement.4. Diet deposed Ni holas as king of Poland.5. Tsar send troops to suppress.6. Feb. 1832 Organi Statute de lare Poland part of Russian Empire.(a) Theoreti ally granted some Polish liberties but Russians ignored them.7. Ni holas ready to supply troops to suppress liberal and nationalist move-ments. 18

Page 19: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

5.2 Revolution in Fran e (1830)1. July 1830 � overthrew Bourbon dynasty.2. Louis 18 died in 1824. Count of Artois su eed as Charles 10; believedivine right.5.2.1 The Rea tionary Poli ies of Charles 101. Had Chamber of Deputies give aristo rats ba k land lost in revolution.(a) Lower interest on government bond to reate fund to pay émigrés.(b) Bourgeoisie bondholders lost in ome; resented.2. Restore primogeniture.3. Punished sa rilege whit imprisonment or death.4. 1827 � liberals gain enough seats in Deputies to for e ompromise.5. Liberals wanted onstitution; unsatis�ed.6. 1829 � Charles 10 repla ed moderate ministry with ultraroyalist headedby Prin e de Poligna .7. Opposition negotiated with liberal Orléans bran h of royal family.5.2.2 The July Revolution1. 1830 Charles 10 want new ele tion → liberals stunning vi tory.2. No a ept � attempt to seize power.3. Jun./Jul. � Poligna sent naval expedition to Algiers � nominally Ot-toman but be ame pirate state.4. Jul. 9 � news of Fren h Empire in N. Afri a.5. 25 Jul. 1830 � take advantage of euphoria; issue Four Ordinan es �royal oup d'état.(a) Restri t freedom of press;(b) Dissolve Chamber of Deputies;( ) Limit fran hise to wealthiest;(d) New ele tions.6. Popular rea tion. Liberal newspaper all to reje t monar hy.(a) Parisian workers barri ade, burdened sin e 1827 by bad e onomy.(b) Troops sent; 1,800 died but no ontrol Paris.19

Page 20: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

7. 2 Aug. � Charles 10 abdi ate; exile in England.8. Deputies name new ministry of onstitutional monar hists. Ended Bour-bon rule; pro laim Louis Philippe, Duke of Oréans new king instead ofinfant grandson Count de Chambord.9. Liberals �ll power va uum reated by Paris uprising and royal failure.10. If liberals didn't a t qui kly, workers would have tried to establish republi .11. Fundamental tension under new monar hy: temporary allian e betweenlaborers and bourgeoisie but soon realized very di�erent goal.5.2.3 Monar hy under Louis Philippe1. July Monar hy more liberal; Louis Philippe alled �king of the Fren h�instead of Fran e.2. Tri olor repla ed with Bourbon �ag.3. Constitution regarded as right of people, not monar hi al on ession.4. Abolish ensorship.5. Wider, but still restri ted fran hise.6. King had to ooperate with Deputies.7. So ially onservative. Oligar hy ontinued in�uen e. Mu h orruption.8. Little sympathy for workers. 1830 workers all for prote tion; ignored.(a) 1831 suppress revolt in Lyons.(b) 1832 suppress uprising during funeral of a popular Napoleoni gen-eral. > 800 killed or wounded.( ) 1834 suppress silk worker strike in Lyons.(d) Unless government addressed so ioe onomi onditions, ontinue toerupt turmoil.9. Algeria give Marseilles mer hants e onomi ties to N. Afri a.(a) Dismantle Ottoman government; onquer and administer interiorwhi h was larger than Fran e.(b) 1850s extended rule after war to Sahara with Muslim tribesmen.( ) Fren h and other Europeans settle in Algeria. Regard as integralpart of Fran e despite Muslim population.20

Page 21: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

5.3 Belgium Be omes Independent (1830)1. Former Austrian Netherlands; merge with Holland 1815.2. Di�er in language, religion, e onomy. Belgian upper lass never a eptedDut h rule.3. 25 Aug. 1830 � Brussels disturban es after opera about rebellion inNaples.(a) Muni ipal authorities and propertied lasses form provisional na-tional government.(b) King William 1 sent troops and ships.( ) 10 Nov. 1830 Dut h defeated.4. 1831 Liberal onstitution.5. Powers saw revolution as upsetting Vienna boundaries, but didn't stop.(a) A/P/Russia, Germany suppressing revolts.(b) Fran e hoped to dominate Belgium.( ) Britain didn't are as long as it was safe.6. Lord Palmerston, Brit. FX minister persuade representatives of powersto re ognize independen e and neutrality.7. Jul. 1831 Prin e Leopold of Saxe-Coburg, onne tions with English royalfamily; married daughter of Louis Philippe and be ame king of the Bel-gians.8. Convention of 1839 guaranteed neutrality.5.4 The Great Reform Bill in Britain (1832)1. Death of George 4 (r. 1820�30) and as ension of William 4 (r. 1830�7)required Parliamentary ele tion.2. Passage of Great Reform Bill di�erent from Continent events. Conser-vatism and Reform a ommodated ea h other.5.4.1 Politi al and E onomi ReformFa tors ontribute to ompromise.1. Commer ial/industrial lass larger. No government ould ignore them.2. Liberal Whig aristo rats favor moderate reforms that make revolutionunne essary. 21

Page 22: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

3. British law, tradition, publi opinion respe t ivil liberties.4. Conservatives in abinet believed they need to a ommodate selves to hanging so ial/e on. life.(a) E onomi freedom;(b) Repeal Combination A ts that prohibited unions.5.4.2 Catholi Eman ipation A t1. Maintain union with Ireland. Similar to Russia's relationship with Poland/Austriawith its groups.2. William Pitt the Younger pass A t of Union. Ireland send 100 to Houseof Commons. But only Protestant Irishmen ele table in Catholi nation.3. 1820s�Daniel O'Connell lead nationalists form Catholi Asso iation.(a) 1828�O'Connell se ure ele tion.(b) Duke of Wellington realize Ireland may ele t Catholi delegation. Noseat → ivil war.( ) 1829�Wellington & Robert Peel steer Catholi Eman ipation A t.Together with 1828 repeal against restri tions for Protestant non on-formists, end Angli an monopoly.4. Liberal measure for onservative purpose: keep order in Ireland.(a) Raised property quali� ation: only wealthy vote.(b) Alienated Wellington's Angli an Tory supporters.( ) 1830 ele tion return reformists. Some Tories supported reform b/ they thought only orrupt House of Commons ould pass Catholi eman ipation.(d) Tories divided; Wellington's ministry fell.5. William 4 good to Earl Grey, leader of Whigs.5.4.3 Legislating ChangeTwo main goals of reform bill Whigs presented:1. Repla e �rotten boroughs� (few voters) with representatives for previouslyunrepresented manufa turing ities.2. In rease fran hise�England and Wales votes in rease 50%.3. 1831�Commons narrowly defeat.4. Grey all new ele tion → won, but Lords reje t.22

Page 23: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

(a) Mass meetings and riots break out.(b) William 4 agreed to reate more peers to give third reform bill ma-jority. Pressured Lords to a ept.5. Great Reform Bill expanded ele torate but no demo ra y.(a) Some workers lost vote be ause old fran hise rights abolished.(b) New urban distri ts didn't help workers: new rural distri t for ea hurban, dominated by aristo ra y.( ) Permitted wider variety of property to be represented; re on iled un-represented property owners.(d) Groundwork for further reform.(e) Maintained traditional institutions but allowing diverse group to in-�uen e.6 In Perspe tiveThe Congress system preserved pea e and the status quo for �fteen years ex eptfor Greek revolt in 1821 and independen e in Latin Ameri a. The RussianDe embrist Revolt of 1825 was a total failure.Nevertheless, liberal ideas and people gained ground and su eeded in 1830with the Fren h Revolution with liberal monar hy. Belgium a hieved indepen-den e and liberal government. Britain moved to the liberals during the 1820s.It favored Latin Ameri an independen e for e onomy and pressure at home ledto the moderate reform bill in 1832. Britain would then be viewed as the leadingliberal and nationalist-supporting state.A AP Test Prep1. a2. e3. b4. 5. a6. d7. 8. b9. e 23

Page 24: Chapter 20: The Conservative Order and the Challenges of Reform (1815-1832)

10. b11. e12. b13. d14. e15. d16. 17. b18. a19. b20. b

24