This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
• Agrarian Economies Also called traditional economies. Rely on historical, social, political, or religious
arrangements or tradition to decide what to produce. Fairly small, close, and rural, and they often work to
support all members. Allocate a larger distribution of goods and services to
those with a defined social status within the society.
Agrarian Economies 2-3
Market Economies
• Market Economies Also called price systems. Rooted in the belief that decisions are best made by
individuals. Private property rights are essential to these systems. Ability to engage in
free enterprise, which is why market economies are often associated with capitalism.
A pure market economy can best be illustrated by using a circular flow chart.
2-4a
FIGURE 2-2The Circular Flow of Economic Activity
Market Economies
• Market Economies (cont.) Rely on millions of independent decisions by individual
households and businesses in the marketplace to determine what to produce.
Comprised of myriad businesses that usually utilize the least-cost method of production.
2-4b
Utilize the price system to determine who receives goods and services.
• People have access to goods and services only if they can pay for them, and their ability to pay is determined by the number and value of resources that they, the people, offer to businesses.
Market Economies
• Market Economies (cont.) Unparalleled opportunity for growth and change.
• Those born into poverty have the ability to transcend that barrier and ascend the economic ladder.
Lack of consideration given by some businesses when profit is a prime motive.
• Can lead to lower costs for businesses, but will lead to higher costs for society due to hazardous products or poor working conditions.
2-4c
Market Economies
• Government Intervention in Market Economies Society frequently turns to the government for help when
it wants to address market failures. Economies are no longer pure after such intervention.
2-4d
FIGURE 2-3Government Intervention in a Market Economy
Planned Economies
• Planned Economies Also called command economies. Rely on planning authorities to decide what to produce. Look to planning authorities to instruct enterprises on
how to produce various items. Trust in planning authorities to distribute goods and
services.
2-5
• Mixed Economies Economies in which decisions are addressed by some
combination of market and centralized decision making. Pure market and pure planned economies are used as a
basis, but neither have real-world counterparts, and neither are perfect in their design.
As market economies experience problems, they tend to move away from pure market to mixed economies, and as planned economies experience failures, they move away from pure planned to mixed economies.
Mixed Economies 2-6
FIGURE 2-4Continuum of Economic Decision Making
Changing Economic Systems
• Beginning in the mid-1980s, dramatic changes occurred in many of the world’s planned economies.
• The Soviet Union, Poland, Hungary, and other nations began moving toward greater use of free markets and individual decision making.
• Privatization allowed individuals to be granted property rights to factors of production that were once collectively owned, or owned by the state.
• Problems have arisen in the transition from planned economies to market economies due to economic problems that defy simple or obvious solutions.
• One lesson learned from these experiences is that, while the commitment to change may be professed quickly, change itself comes slowly.
2-7
The U.S. Economic System
• The U.S. economy has been described as a mixed economic system; one that primarily depends on markets and individual decisions, though some government intervention is also present.
• It came as a result of the transformation of England and Scotland into industrial market economies.
• This began with the rise of economic individualism.• In his book The Wealth of Nations in 1776, Scottish
philosopher Adam Smith proposed a new economic system called laissez-faire (let it alone) capitalism which challenged the reigning system of mercantilism in which the state was deemed to be the best judge of what is good for an economy.
• Central to Smith’s argument for a new economic system was his invisible hand doctrine.
2-8a
The U.S. Economic System
• According to his doctrine, people do not base their business dealing with others on altruism or benevolence. Rather, people carry on their business in a way that serves their own best interests.
• Smith explained that by pursuing one’s own best interest, one is guided “as if by an invisible hand” to advance the interests of all society.
• As this philosophy rose, the British world saw significant technological and social changes that are known today as the British Industrial Revolution.
• It spurred a series of inventions and innovations such as massive mechanical weaving looms and steam engines.
• These inventions led to changes in how goods and services were rendered.
2-8b
• Along with the progress made by England and Scotland between the 17th and 19th centuries, the evolution of the U.S. economy was brought about by several key events in the U.S:
Prior to the Civil War, the U.S. economy was primarily agricultural, but following the Civil War substantial and significant changes occurred due to an industrial boom experienced throughout the majority of the country.
With this boom in the economy came regulation of companies that were becoming large and might be able to monopolize markets.
Along with regulation of monopolies, the government intervened in other problems, such as the harsh living and working conditions.
The next round of government interventions would come in the form of the New Deal.
Highlights of the U.S. Economy 2-9a
Due to the stock market crash of 1929 and the following economic decline, the “New Deal” created a series of programs and legislative reforms instituted during the presidential administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
The next big intervention made by the government would come in the form of the Employment Act of 1946, which provided Congress with the ability to manipulate taxes and government spending in an effort to bring the economy to a desired level of activity.
Regulatory activities increased in the 1960s and the 1970s, until a deregulation trend developed in the late 1970s and continued in the 1980s as part of the Carter and Reagan administrations.
Since the 1980s, the federal debt has risen dramatically. By 2003 the debt exceeded $6.5 trillion, and the
regulatory activity trend was once again reversed.