1 Chapter 19 Performance Evaluation
Jan 21, 2016
1
Chapter 19
Performance Evaluation
2
And with that they clapped him into irons and hauled him off to the barracks. There he was taught “right turn,” “left turn,” and “quick march,” “slope arms,” and “order arms,” how to aim and how to fire, and was
given thirty strokes of the “cat.” Next day his performance on parade was a little better, and he was
given only twenty strokes. The following day he received a mere ten and was thought a prodigy by his comrades.
- From Candide by Voltaire
3
Outline Introduction Importance of measuring portfolio risk Traditional performance measures Performance evaluation with cash deposits
and withdrawals Performance evaluation when options are
used
4
Introduction Performance evaluation is a critical aspect
of portfolio management
Proper performance evaluation should involve a recognition of both the return and the riskiness of the investment
5
Importance of Measuring Portfolio Risk
Introduction A lesson from history: the 1968 Bank
Administration Institute report A lesson from a few mutual funds Why the arithmetic mean is often
misleading: a review Why dollars are more important than
percentages
6
Introduction When two investments’ returns are
compared, their relative risk must also be considered
People maximize expected utility:• A positive function of expected return• A negative function of the return variance
2( ) ( ),E U f E R
7
A Lesson from History The 1968 Bank Administration Institute’s
Measuring the Investment Performance of Pension Funds concluded:
1) Performance of a fund should be measured by computing the actual rates of return on a fund’s assets
2) These rates of return should be based on the market value of the fund’s assets
8
A Lesson from History (cont’d)3) Complete evaluation of the manager’s
performance must include examining a measure of the degree of risk taken in the fund
4) Circumstances under which fund managers must operate vary so great that indiscriminate comparisons among funds might reflect differences in these circumstances rather than in the ability of managers
9
A Lesson from A Few Mutual Funds
The two key points with performance evaluation:• The arithmetic mean is not a useful statistic in
evaluating growth• Dollars are more important than percentages
Consider the historical returns of two mutual funds on the following slide
10
A Lesson from A Few Mutual Funds (cont’d)
Year44 Wall Street
Mutual Shares Year
44 Wall Street
Mutual Shares
1975 184.1% 24.6% 1982 6.9 12.0
1976 46.5 63.1 1983 9.2 37.8
1977 16.5 13.2 1984 -58.7 14.3
1978 32.9 16.1 1985 -20.1 26.3
1979 71.4 39.3 1986 -16.3 16.9
1980 36.1 19.0 1987 -34.6 6.5
1981 -23.6 8.7 1988 19.3 30.7
Mean 19.3% 23.5%
11
A Lesson from A Few Mutual Funds (cont’d)
Mutual Fund Performance
$-$20,000.00$40,000.00$60,000.00$80,000.00
$100,000.00$120,000.00$140,000.00$160,000.00$180,000.00$200,000.00
Year
En
din
g V
alu
e (
$)
44 WallStreet
MutualShares
12
A Lesson from A Few Mutual Funds (cont’d)
44 Wall Street and Mutual Shares both had good returns over the 1975 to 1988 period
Mutual Shares clearly outperforms 44 Wall Street in terms of dollar returns at the end of 1988
13
Why the Arithmetic Mean Is Often Misleading
The arithmetic mean may give misleading information• E.g., a 50% decline in one period followed by a
50% increase in the next period does not return 0%, on average
14
Why the Arithmetic Mean Is Often Misleading (cont’d)
The proper measure of average investment return over time is the geometric mean:
1/
1
1
where the return relative in period
nn
ii
i
GM R
R i
15
Why the Arithmetic Mean Is Often Misleading (cont’d)
The geometric means in the preceding example are:• 44 Wall Street: 7.9%• Mutual Shares: 22.7%
The geometric mean correctly identifies Mutual Shares as the better investment over the 1975 to 1988 period
16
Why the Arithmetic Mean Is Often Misleading (cont’d)
Example
A stock returns –40% in the first period, +50% in the second period, and 0% in the third period.
What is the geometric mean over the three periods?
17
Why the Arithmetic Mean Is Often Misleading (cont’d)
Example
Solution: The geometric mean is computed as follows:
1/
1
1
(0.60)(1.50)(1.00) 1
0.10 10%
nn
ii
GM R
18
Why Dollars Are More Important than Percentages
Assume two funds:• Fund A has $40 million in investments and
earned 12% last period
• Fund B has $250,000 in investments and earned 44% last period
19
Why Dollars Are More Important than Percentages
The correct way to determine the return of both funds combined is to weigh the funds’ returns by the dollar amounts:
$40,000,000 $250,00012% 44% 12.10%
$40,250,000 $40,250,000
20
Traditional Performance Measures
Sharpe and Treynor measures Jensen measure Performance measurement in practice
21
Sharpe and Treynor Measures The Sharpe and Treynor measures:
Sharpe measure
Treynor measure
where average return
risk-free rate
standard deviation of returns
beta
f
f
f
R R
R R
R
R
22
Sharpe and Treynor Measures (cont’d)
The Treynor measure evaluates the return relative to beta, a measure of systematic risk• It ignores any unsystematic risk
The Sharpe measure evaluates return relative to total risk• Appropriate for a well-diversified portfolio, but
not for individual securities
23
Sharpe and Treynor Measures (cont’d)
Example
Over the last four months, XYZ Stock had excess returns of 1.86%, -5.09%, -1.99%, and 1.72%. The standard deviation of XYZ stock returns is 3.07%. XYZ Stock has a beta of 1.20.
What are the Sharpe and Treynor measures for XYZ Stock?
24
Sharpe and Treynor Measures (cont’d)
Example (cont’d)
Solution: First compute the average excess return for Stock XYZ:
1.86% 5.09% 1.99% 1.72%
40.88%
R
25
Sharpe and Treynor Measures (cont’d)
Example (cont’d)
Solution (cont’d): Next, compute the Sharpe and Treynor measures:
0.88%Sharpe measure 0.29
3.07%
0.88%Treynor measure 0.73
1.20
f
f
R R
R R
26
Jensen Measure The Jensen measure stems directly from the
CAPM:
it ft i mt ftR R R R
27
Jensen Measure (cont’d) The constant term should be zero
• Securities with a beta of zero should have an excess return of zero according to finance theory
According to the Jensen measure, if a portfolio manager is better-than-average, the alpha of the portfolio will be positive
28
Jensen Measure (cont’d) The Jensen measure is generally out of
favor because of statistical and theoretical problems
29
Performance Measurement in Practice
Academic issues Industry issues
30
Academic Issues The use of traditional performance
measures relies on the CAPM
Evidence continues to accumulate that may ultimately displace the CAPM• APT, multi-factor CAPMs, inflation-adjusted
CAPM
31
Industry Issues “Portfolio managers are hired and fired
largely on the basis of realized investment returns with little regard to risk taken in achieving the returns”
Practical performance measures typically involve a comparison of the fund’s performance with that of a benchmark
32
Industry Issues (cont’d) Fama’s decomposition can be used to assess
why an investment performed better or worse than expected:• The return the investor chose to take• The added return the manager chose to seek• The return from the manager’s good selection
of securities
33
34
Performance Evaluation With Cash Deposits & Withdrawals
Introduction Daily valuation method Modified Bank Administration Institute
(BAI) Method An example An approximate method
35
Introduction The owner of a fund often taken periodic
distributions from the portfolio and may occasionally add to it
The established way to calculate portfolio performance in this situation is via a time-weighted rate of return:• Daily valuation method• Modified BAI method
36
Daily Valuation Method The daily valuation method:
• Calculates the exact time-weighted rate of return
• Is cumbersome because it requires determining a value for the portfolio each time any cash flow occurs
– Might be interest, dividends, or additions and withdrawals
37
Daily Valuation Method (cont’d)
The daily valuation method solves for R:
daily1
1
where
n
ii
i
i
R S
MVES
MVB
38
Daily Valuation Method (cont’d)
MVEi = market value of the portfolio at the end of period i before any cash flows in period i but including accrued income for the period
MVBi = market value of the portfolio at the beginning of period i including any cash flows at the end of the previous subperiod and including accrued income
39
Modified BAI Method The modified BAI method:
• Approximates the internal rate of return for the investment over the period in question
• Can be complicated with a large portfolio that might conceivably have a cash flow every day
40
Modified BAI Method (cont’d) It solves for R:
1
0
(1 )
where the sum of the cash flows during the period
market value at the end of the period,
including accrued income
market value at the start of the period
to
i
nw
ii
ii
MVE F R
F
MVE
F
CD Dw
CDCD
tal number of days in the period
number of days since the beginning of the period
in which the cash flow occurrediD
41
An Example An investor has an account with a mutual
fund and “dollar cost averages” by putting $100 per month into the fund
The following slide shows the activity and results over a seven-month period
42
43
An Example (cont’d) The daily valuation method returns a time-
weighted return of 40.6% over the seven-months period• See next slide
44
45
An Example (cont’d) The BAI method requires use of a computer
The BAI method returns a time-weighted return of 42.1% over the seven-months period (see next slide)
46
47
An Approximate Method Proposed by the American Association of
Individual Investors:
1
0
0.5(Net cash flow)1
0.5(Net cash flow)
where net cash flow is the sum of inflows and outflows
PR
P
48
An Approximate Method (cont’d)
Using the approximate method in Table 19-6:
1
0
0.5(Net cash flow)1
0.5(Net cash flow)
5,500.97 0.5( 4,200)1
7,550.08 0.5(-4,200)
0.395 39.5%
PR
P
49
Performance Evaluation When Options Are Used
Introduction Incremental risk-adjusted return from
options Residual option spread Final comments on performance evaluation
with options
50
Introduction Inclusion of options in a portfolio usually
results in a non-normal return distribution
Beta and standard deviation lose their theoretical value of the return distribution is nonsymmetrical
51
Introduction (cont’d) Consider two alternative methods when
options are included in a portfolio:• Incremental risk-adjusted return (IRAR)
• Residual option spread (ROS)
52
Incremental Risk-Adjusted Return from Options
Definition An IRAR example IRAR caveats
53
Definition The incremental risk-adjusted return
(IRAR) is a single performance measure indicating the contribution of an options program to overall portfolio performance• A positive IRAR indicates above-average
performance• A negative IRAR indicates the portfolio would
have performed better without options
54
Definition (cont’d) Use the unoptioned portfolio as a
benchmark:• Draw a line from the risk-free rate to its
realized risk/return combination
• Points above this benchmark line result from superior performance
– The higher than expected return is the IRAR
55
Definition (cont’d)
56
Definition (cont’d) The IRAR calculation:
( )
where Sharpe measure of the optioned portfolio
Sharpe measure of the unoptioned portfolio
standard deviation of the optioned portfolio
o u o
o
u
o
IRAR SH SH
SH
SH
57
An IRAR Example A portfolio manager routinely writes index
call options to take advantage of anticipated market movements
Assume:• The portfolio has an initial value of $200,000• The stock portfolio has a beta of 1.0• The premiums received from option writing are
invested into more shares of stock
58
59
An IRAR Example (cont’d) The IRAR calculation (next slide) shows
that:• The optioned portfolio appreciated more than
the unoptioned portfolio
• The options program was successful at adding about 12% per year to the overall performance of the fund
60
61
IRAR Caveats IRAR can be used inappropriately if there is
a floor on the return of the optioned portfolio• E.g., a portfolio manager might use puts to
protect against a large fall in stock price The standard deviation of the optioned
portfolio is probably a poor measure of risk in these cases
62
Residual Option Spread The residual option spread (ROS) is an
alternative performance measure for portfolios containing options
A positive ROS indicates the use of options resulted in more terminal wealth than only holding stock
A positive ROS does not necessarily mean that the incremental return is appropriate given the risk
63
Residual Option Spread (cont’d)
The residual option spread (ROS) calculation:
1 1
1where /
value of portfolio in Period
n n
ot utt t
t t t
t
ROS G G
G V V
V t
64
Residual Option Spread (cont’d)
The worksheet to calculate the ROS for the previous example is shown on the next slide
The ROS translates into a dollar differential of $1,452
65
66
The M2 Performance Measure
Developed by Franco and Leah Modigliani in 1997
Seeks to express relative performance in risk-adjusted basis points• Ensures that the portfolio being evaluated and
the benchmark have the same standard deviation
67
The M2 Performance Measure (cont’d)
Calculate the risk-adjusted portfolio return as follows:
benchmarkrisk-adjusted portfolio actual portfolio
portfolio
benchmark
portfolio
1 f
R R
R
68
Final Comments IRAR and ROS both focus on whether an
optioned portfolio outperforms an unoptioned portfolio• Can overlook subjective considerations such as
portfolio insurance