Top Banner
Chapter 12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
36

Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Jul 29, 2018

Download

Documents

duongcong
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12

Monopolistic Competitionand Oligopoly

Page 2: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 2©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Topics to be Discussed

�Monopolistic Competition

�Oligopoly

�Price Competition

�Competition Versus Collusion: ThePrisoners’ Dilemma

Page 3: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 3©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition

� Characteristics1. Many firms

2. Free entry and exit

3. Differentiated product

Page 4: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 4©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition

� The amount of monopoly power dependson the degree of differentiation

�Examples of this very common marketstructure include:�Toothpaste

�Soap

�Cold remedies

Page 5: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 5©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition

� Toothpaste� Crest and monopoly power

� Procter & Gamble is the sole producer of Crest

� Consumers can have a preference for Crest –taste, reputation, decay-preventing efficacy

� The greater the preference (differentiation) thehigher the price

Page 6: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 6©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition

� Two important characteristics�Differentiated but highly substitutable

products

�Free entry and exit

Page 7: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

A Monopolistically CompetitiveFirm in the Short and Long Run

Quantity

$/Q

Quantity

$/QMC

AC

MC

AC

DSR

MRSR

DLR

MRLR

QSR

PSR

QLR

PLR

Short Run Long Run

Page 8: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 8©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

A Monopolistically CompetitiveFirm in the Short and Long Run

�Short run�Downward sloping demand – differentiated

product

�Demand is relatively elastic – goodsubstitutes

�MR < P

�Profits are maximized when MR = MC

�This firm is making economic profits

Page 9: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 9©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

A Monopolistically CompetitiveFirm in the Short and Long Run

� Long run�Profits will attract new firms to the industry

(no barriers to entry)

�The old firm’s demand will decrease to DLR

�Firm’s output and price will fall

�Industry output will rise

�No economic profit (P = AC)

�P > MC � some monopoly power

Page 10: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Deadweight lossMC AC

Monopolistically and PerfectlyCompetitive Equilibrium (LR)

$/Q

Quantity

$/Q

D = MR

QC

PC

MC AC

DLR

MRLR

QMC

P

Quantity

Perfect Competition Monopolistic Competition

Page 11: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 11©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition andEconomic Efficiency

� The monopoly power yields a higherprice than perfect competition. If pricewas lowered to the point where MC = D,consumer surplus would increase by theyellow triangle – deadweight loss.

�With no economic profits in the long run,the firm is still not producing at minimumAC and excess capacity exists.

Page 12: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 12©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition andEconomic Efficiency

� Firm faces downward sloping demand sozero profit point is to the left of minimumaverage cost

�Excess capacity is inefficient becauseaverage cost would be lower with fewerfirms�Inefficiencies would make consumers worse

off

Page 13: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 13©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Monopolistic Competition

� If inefficiency is bad for consumers,should monopolistic competition beregulated?� Market power is relatively small. Usually

there are enough firms to compete withenough substitutability between firms –deadweight loss small.

� Inefficiency is balanced by benefit ofincreased product diversity – may easilyoutweigh deadweight loss.

Page 14: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 14©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Market for Colas and Coffee (Ex12-1)

�Each market has much differentiation inproducts and tries to gain consumersthrough that differentiation�Coke vs. Pepsi

�Maxwell House vs. Folgers

�How much monopoly power do each ofthese producers have?�How elastic is demand for each brand?

Page 15: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 15©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Elasticities of Demand for Brands ofColas and Coffee (Ex 12-1)

Page 16: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 16©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Market for Colas and Coffee (Ex12-1)

� The demand for Royal Crown is moreprice inelastic than for Coke

� There is significant monopoly power inthese two markets

� The greater the elasticity, the lessmonopoly power and vice versa

Page 17: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 17©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly – Characteristics

�Small number of firms in a market�Product differentiation may or may not

exist�Barriers to entry

�Scale economies�Patents�Technology�Name recognition�Strategic action

Page 18: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 18©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly

�Examples�Automobiles

�Steel

�Aluminum

�Petrochemicals

�Electrical equipment

Page 19: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 19©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly

�Management Challenges�Strategic actions to deter entry

� Threaten to decrease price against newcompetitors by keeping excess capacity

�Rival behavior� Because only a few firms, each must consider

how its actions will affect its rivals and in turnhow their rivals will react

Page 20: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 20©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly – Equilibrium

� If one firm decides to cut their price, theymust consider what the other firms in theindustry will do�Could cut price some, the same amount, or

more than firm

�Could lead to price war and drastic fall inprofits for all

�Actions and reactions are dynamic,evolving over time

Page 21: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 21©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly – Equilibrium

� Defining Equilibrium�Firms are doing the best they can and have no

incentive to change their output or price

�All firms assume competitors are taking rivaldecisions into account

� Nash Equilibrium�Each firm is doing the best it can given what its

competitors are doing

� We will focus on duopoly�Markets in which two firms compete

Page 22: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 22©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly

� The Cournot Model�Oligopoly model in which firms produce a

homogeneous good, each firm treats theoutput of its competitors as fixed, and allfirms decide simultaneously how much toproduce

�Firm will adjust its output based on what itthinks the other firm will produce

Page 23: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 23©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

���������������� �������������

French philosopher,mathematician and economist,Augustin Cournot has beenrightly hailed as one of thegreatest of the Proto-Marginalists . The uniqueinsights of his majoreconomics work, ����� ����� ������ �����������é���������������é� ������� ���������(1838)were without parallel. Although neglected in his time,the impact of Cournot work onmodern economics can hardlybe overstated.

Page 24: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 24©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

MC1

50

MR1(75)

D1(75)

12.5

If Firm 1 thinks Firm 2 will produce 75 units, its demand curve is

shifted to the left by this amount.

Firm 1’s Output Decision

Q1

P1

D1(0)

MR1(0)

Firm 1 and market demand curve,D1(0), if Firm 2 produces nothing.

D1(50)MR1(50)

25

If Firm 1 thinks Firm 2 will produce 50 units, its demand curve is

shifted to the left by this amount.

Page 25: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 25©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly

� The Reaction Curve�The relationship between a firm’s profit-

maximizing output and the amount it thinksits competitor will produce

�A firm’s profit-maximizing output is adecreasing schedule of the expected outputof Firm 2

Page 26: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 26©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Firm 2’s ReactionCurve Q*2(Q1)

Firm 2’s reaction curve shows how much itwill produce as a function of how much

it thinks Firm 1 will produce.

Reaction Curves and CournotEquilibrium

Q2

Q1

25 50 75 100

25

50

75

100

Firm 1’s ReactionCurve Q*1(Q2)

x

x

x

x

Firm 1’s reaction curve shows how much itwill produce as a function of how much it thinks Firm 2 will produce. The x’s

correspond to the previous model.

Page 27: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 27©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Firm 2’s ReactionCurve Q*2(Q1)

Reaction Curves and CournotEquilibrium

Q2

Q1

25 50 75 100

25

50

75

100

Firm 1’s ReactionCurve Q*1(Q2)

x

x

x

x

In Cournot equilibrium, eachfirm correctly assumes how

much its competitors willproduce and thereby

maximizes its own profits.

CournotEquilibrium

Page 28: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 28©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Cournot Equilibrium

�Each firm’s reaction curve tells it howmuch to produce given the output of itscompetitor

�Equilibrium in the Cournot model, inwhich each firm correctly assumes howmuch its competitor will produce and setsits own production level accordingly

Page 29: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 29©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly

� Cournot equilibrium is an example of aNash equilibrium (Cournot-NashEquilibrium)

� The Cournot equilibrium says nothingabout the dynamics of the adjustmentprocess� Since both firms adjust their output, neither

output would be fixed

Page 30: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 30©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

The Linear Demand Curve

�An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium�Two firms face linear market demand curve

�We can compare competitive equilibrium andthe equilibrium resulting from collusion

�Market demand is P = 30 - Q

�Q is total production of both firms:

Q = Q1 + Q2

�Both firms have MC1 = MC2 = 0

Page 31: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 31©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly Example

� Firm 1’s Reaction Curve � MR = MC

111 )30( QQPQR −== :Revenue Total

12211

1211

30

)(30

QQQQ

QQQQ

−−=

+−=

Page 32: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 32©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly Example

�An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium

12

21

11

21111

2115

2115

0

230

QQ

QQ

MCMR

QQQRMR

−=

−=

==

−−=ΔΔ=

Curve Reaction s2' Firm

Curve Reaction s1' Firm

Page 33: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 33©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Oligopoly Example

�An Example of the Cournot Equilibrium

1030

20

10)2115(2115

21

1

1

=−=

=+=

=−−

=

QP

QQQ

Q

QQ 2:mEquilibriu Cournot

Page 34: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 34©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Duopoly ExampleQ1

Q2

Firm 2’sReaction Curve

30

15

Firm 1’sReaction Curve

15

30

10

10

Cournot Equilibrium

The demand curve is P = 30 - Q andboth firms have 0 marginal cost.

Page 35: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 35©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Page 36: Chapter 12yamamoto/files/Jul_6.pdf · LR MR LR Q SR P SR Q LR P LR ... Competitive Equilibrium (LR) $/Q ... ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 28 Cournot Equilibrium Each firm’s

Chapter 12 36©2005 Pearson Education, Inc.