Page 1
Chapter 11Chapter 11
©2001 ©2001 Prentice-HallPrentice-Hall©2001 ©2001 Prentice-HallPrentice-Hall
S. Thomas Foster, Jr.S. Thomas Foster, Jr.Boise State UniversityBoise State University
Slides Prepared bySlides Prepared byBruce R. BarringerBruce R. Barringer
University of Central FloridaUniversity of Central Florida
S. Thomas Foster, Jr.S. Thomas Foster, Jr.Boise State UniversityBoise State University
Slides Prepared bySlides Prepared byBruce R. BarringerBruce R. Barringer
University of Central FloridaUniversity of Central Florida
Managing Quality Improvement Teams and Projects
Managing Quality Improvement Teams and Projects
Page 2
Transparency 11-2Transparency 11-2© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Chapter Overview Chapter Overview
• Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Types of Teams
• Implementing Teams
• Managing and Controlling Projects
Page 3
Transparency 11-3Transparency 11-3© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
IntroductionIntroduction
• The need for employee participation as a key element in managing changing organizations in an increasing complex world.
• There are several reasons.
• One of the biggest is complexity in the workplace.
• Also, business is transforming itself from a “ command and control” environment to one of collaboration.
Page 4
Transparency 11-4Transparency 11-4© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
IntroductionIntroduction
• Such collaboration is needed as complexity drives workers from routine work to knowledge work, or work that involves the development and transmission of knowledge and information.
• Figure 11.1 shows that the difference between routine work and knowledge-based work.
• Knowledge work is effective when workers are given a certain amount of autonomy and decision-making authority.
Page 5
Transparency 11-5Transparency 11-5© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
IntroductionIntroduction
• Figure 11.1 Differences between routine and knowledge work
Programmed
Repeated patterns
Analyzable
Well understood
Static
Programmed
Repeated patterns
Analyzable
Well understood
Static
Routine WorkRoutine Work
Emergent
Varied, unique
Interdependent
Uncertain
Dynamic
Emergent
Varied, unique
Interdependent
Uncertain
Dynamic
Knowledge WorkKnowledge Work
Page 6
Transparency 11-6Transparency 11-6© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
IntroductionIntroduction
• As more collaborative practices are being adopted in business, teamwork is the natural result.
• A team is defined as a finite number of individuals who are united in a common purpose.
• These team approaches are used in conjunction with the tools of quality as discussed in chapter 10.
• Joseph Juran stated that the improvement of quality should be approached on a “ project-by-project basis, and in no other way.”
Page 7
Transparency 11-7Transparency 11-7© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
IntroductionIntroduction
• Philip Crosby also supports the use of teams in improving quality.
• This is such a widely practiced approach to quality improvement.
Page 8
Transparency 11-8Transparency 11-8© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
IntroductionIntroduction
• Why Employees Enjoy Teams -- Well-led teams often lead to improved employee
morale.
-- Employees like teams for many reasons with five motivators emerged.
1. Mutuality 2. Recognition for personal achievement
3. Belonging 4. Bounded power
5. Creative autonomy
Page 9
Transparency 11-9Transparency 11-9© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Why Employees Enjoy TeamsSlide 1 of 3
Why Employees Enjoy TeamsSlide 1 of 3
• Mutuality– The need for mutual support and encouragement.
• Recognition for Personal Achievement– The opportunity for personal development as well
as recognition for personal achievement through rewards, incentives, or status.
• Belonging– The individual’s need for supportive, cohesive, and
friendly team relations.
Page 10
Transparency 11-10Transparency 11-10© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Why Employees Enjoy TeamsSlide 2 of 3
Why Employees Enjoy TeamsSlide 2 of 3
• Bounded Power– The need for authority and control over
project resources and people, personal accountability and challenge, individuals’ abilities to influence decision that affect the project, and opportunities for personal growth and development.
Page 11
Transparency 11-11Transparency 11-11© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Why Employees Enjoy TeamsSlide 3 of 3
Why Employees Enjoy TeamsSlide 3 of 3
• Creative Autonomy– The need for individuals to have the
opportunity to use their creativity and potential during the course of a project and to enjoy good working conditions.
Page 12
Transparency 11-12Transparency 11-12© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 1 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 1 of 10
• Employee Empowerment– Empowerment means giving power to team
members who previously had little control over their jobs.
• Implicit in Empowerment is a Series of Promises to Employees. Examples include:– You will have greater control over your work.– You will not be penalized for making decisions that
don’t pan out.– and more ( see page 325)
Page 13
Transparency 11-13Transparency 11-13© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• The Baldrige criteria encourages employee participation adding that is shown on page 325.
Page 14
Transparency 11-14Transparency 11-14© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 2 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 2 of 10
Preconditions Necessary for Empowerment
Clear authority and accountability
Participation in Planning at all
Levels
Adequate Communication and Information
for Decision Making
Responsibility With Authority
Page 15
Transparency 11-15Transparency 11-15© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Many issues surround empowerment and teamwork that must be addressed (see A Closer Look at Quality 11.1).
• This issues range from operations and behavior to organization design.
Page 16
Transparency 11-16Transparency 11-16© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 3 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 3 of 10
• Organizational Learning– Organizational learning implies change in organizational
behavior in a way that improves performance.
– The type of learning takes place through a network of interrelated components.
– These components include teamwork, strategies, structures, cultures, systems, and their interactions.
– Corporate learning relies on an open cultures where individuals can engage in learning, questioning, and not remain constrained by “taboos” or existing norms.
Page 17
Transparency 11-17Transparency 11-17© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Flattening Hierarchies for Improved Effectiveness– Along with the emphasis on teamwork and
empowerment, there has been a move toward flattening hierarchies in organizations.
– Too many layers of management can also impede creativity, stifle initiative, and make empowerment impossible.
– With fewer layers of management, companies tend to rely more on team.
Page 18
Transparency 11-18Transparency 11-18© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Flattening Hierarchies for Improved Effectiveness– Time will tell whether eliminating levels of
management in an organization actually results in long-term competitive improvement.
– It is clear that this is a trend that will continue for some time.
– The movement toward fewer levels of management and greater emphasis on collaborative learning has increased the emphasis on teamwork.
Page 19
Transparency 11-19Transparency 11-19© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 4 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 4 of 10
Team Leader Role and Responsibility
-- Quality professionals are unanimous – to be successful in achieving teamwork and participation, strong leadership both at the company level and within teams is essential.
-- We know that leaders are responsible for setting team direction and seeking future opportunities for the team.
Page 20
Transparency 11-20Transparency 11-20© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Leaders -- reinforce values and provide a system for
achieving desired goals. -- establish expectations for high levels of
performance, customer focus, and continual learning.
-- are responsible for communicating effectively, for evaluating organizational performance, and for providing feedback concerning such performance.
Page 21
Transparency 11-21Transparency 11-21© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 5 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 5 of 10
• Situational Leadership Model– According to this model, situational leadership
is based on interplay among the following:• The amount of guidance and direction a leader
gives (task behavior).• The amount of socioeconomic support a leaders
provides (relationship behavior).• The readiness level the followers exhibit in
performing a specific task, function, or objective.
Page 22
Transparency 11-22Transparency 11-22© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• If team members are trained and prepared so they are “task ready,” leadership will be more effective.
• Readiness is the “extent to which a follower has the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task.”
• Readiness is a function of two variables. Theses are ability and technical skills, and self-confidence in one’s ability.
• Effective leadership helps employees become competent and instills confidence in employees that they can do the job.
Page 23
Transparency 11-23Transparency 11-23© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 6 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 6 of 10
• Situational Leadership Model (continued)– Figure 11.2 shows the situational leadership
model with four different styles of leadership.
– As the model shows, different contingencies drive different styles of leadership.
– According to the model, the best approach to leading depends on the readiness of employees to perform tasks and functions or accomplish objectives.
Page 24
Transparency 11-24Transparency 11-24© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 7 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 7 of 10
Figure 12.2 Situational Leadership Model
Selling
Telling
Participating
Delegating
High
Low
Low High
Emotional Support
(Consideration)
Guidance (Structure)
Page 25
Transparency 11-25Transparency 11-25© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• As it relates to quality management, leadership is especially difficult.
• To many leaders this implies a laissez-faire, or a hands-off approach to management.
• Many leaders feel that they are to provide resources but that they should not be involved in overly controlling employee behavior.
• Quality management is not a vehicle by which leaders abdicate their responsibility.
Page 26
Transparency 11-26Transparency 11-26© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Employees want leaders who provide clear direction, necessary information, feedback on performance, insight, and ideas.
• The single most important attribute of companies with failed quality management programs is lack of leadership.
• A close second is poor communication, which is related to leadership.
• Effective leaders are people who are able to provide visions, ideas, and motivation to others to achieve the greater good.
Page 27
Transparency 11-27Transparency 11-27© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Team Roles and Responsibilities --Meredith Belbin provide a widely adopted typology
of team roles.
-- Table 11.1 contains names and profiles for each of these roles.
-- Each of these roles may be more relevant at different stages during a project.
-- These roles are not mutually exclusive. This means that one person can fulfill different roles on a team.
Page 28
Transparency 11-28Transparency 11-28© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Table 11.1 Belbin’s Team Roles
Page 29
Transparency 11-29Transparency 11-29© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 8 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 8 of 10
• Stages of a Team’s Development ( please see Figure 11.3)– Forming
• Where the team is composed and the objective for the team is set.
– Storming• Where the team members begin to get to know
each other and agreements have not been made that facilitate smooth interaction between team members.
Page 30
Transparency 11-30Transparency 11-30© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Stages of a Team’s Development (continued)
- Norming• Where the team becomes a cohesive unit and
interdependence, trust, and cooperation develop.
Page 31
Transparency 11-31Transparency 11-31© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 9 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 9 of 10
• Stages of a Team’s Development (continued)– Performing
• Where a mutually supportive, steady state is achieved.
– Mourning• Where team members regret the ending of the
project and the breaking up of a team.
Page 32
Transparency 11-32Transparency 11-32© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 10 of 10
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Slide 10 of 10
Figure 11.3 Stages of Team Development
Forming
Storming
Norming
Performing
Mourning
Page 33
Transparency 11-33Transparency 11-33© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Team Rules
-- During the norming stage, teams develop ground rules. Such ground rules can forestall conflict.
-- Common ground rules for teams in projects are shown in Table 11.2.
-- It is often useful to establish ground rules first in order for a team to be functional.
Page 34
Transparency 11-34Transparency 11-34© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
Leading Teams for Quality Improvement
• Table 11.2 Ground rules for effective teams
Page 35
Transparency 11-35Transparency 11-35© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Continuous process improvement often requires small teams that are segmented by work areas.
• Projects with multiple departments in a company require cross-functional teams.
• The literature is full of different types of teams and approaches to teamwork.
• Table 11.3 contains a list of a few of the major types of teams found in the literature.
Page 36
Transparency 11-36Transparency 11-36© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of Teams Slide 1 of 4
Types of Teams Slide 1 of 4
Team Type Scope
Process Improvement team Local or single department
Cross-function team Multiple departments
Tiger team Organization-wide
Natural work team Customer- or region-centered
Self-directed work team Narrow or broad
Table 11.3 Types of teamsTable 11.3 Types of teams
Page 37
Transparency 11-37Transparency 11-37© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsSlide 2 of 4
Types of TeamsSlide 2 of 4
• Process Improvement Teams– Are teams that work to improve processes and
customer service.– These teams may work under the direction of
management or may be self-directed.– In either case, process improvement teams are
involved in some or all of the following activities: identifying opportunities for improvement, prioritizing opportunities, selecting projects, gathering data, analyzing data, making recommendations, implementing change, and conducting post-implementation reviews.
Page 38
Transparency 11-38Transparency 11-38© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Cross-Functional Teams– Are teams that enlist people from a variety of
functional groups within the firm.
– Such teams often work on macro-level, quality-related problems such as communication or designing company-wide processes.
Page 39
Transparency 11-39Transparency 11-39© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Tiger Teams– A high-powered team assigned to work on a
specific problem for a limited amount of time.
– These teams are often used in reengineering efforts or in projects where a specific problem needs to be solved in a very short period of time.
Page 40
Transparency 11-40Transparency 11-40© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Natural Work Group– Are teams organization around a common product,
customer, or service.– These teams are cross-functional and include
marketers, researchers, engineers, and producers.The objective of these teams includes tasks such as increasing responsiveness to customers and market demand. A great deal of effort is typically expended relating to organizational redesign and systems redesign, to improve job design, to improve work life for employees, to improve service by focusing work units in an organization on the customer.
Page 41
Transparency 11-41Transparency 11-41© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsSlide 3 of 4
Types of TeamsSlide 3 of 4
• Self-Directed Work Teams– A team chartered to work on projects identified by
team members themselves.– Self-directed teams are identified as either little s or
big S teams.– Little s self-directed work teams are made up of
employees empowered to identify opportunities for improvement, select improvement projects, and complete implementation.
– Big S self-directed work teams are involved in managing the different functions of the company without a traditional management structure,
Page 42
Transparency 11-42Transparency 11-42© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Technology and Teams– New tools for teamwork are constantly emerging.– The model for team effectiveness in Figure 11.4 shows
how team use information systems tools and demonstrates that organizational integration and simultaneity methods are important components of team effectiveness.
– This model amplifies that more and more, team effectiveness is assisted by integrated tools and technologies, and the impact of technology should increase.
Page 43
Transparency 11-43Transparency 11-43© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Figure 11.4 A team effectiveness model
Page 44
Transparency 11-44Transparency 11-44© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Types of TeamsTypes of Teams
• Virtual Teams– Are teams that rarely or never physically meet, except
in electronic meetings using group decision software. – Internet and intranet-based applications call team-
ware are emerging that allow us to access the WWW and build a team, share ideas, hold virtual meetings, brainstorm, keep schedules, and archive past results with people in far-flung locations around the world.
– Hectic schedules and the difficulty in finding convenient times to meet to solve problems will make teams of this type more important in the future ( see A Closer Look at Quality 11.2).
Page 45
Transparency 11-45Transparency 11-45© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsSlide 1 of 3
Implementing TeamsSlide 1 of 3
• Facilitation– Is helping or aiding teams by maintaining a
process orientation and focusing the group.
• Team Building– Is accomplished by following a process that
identifies roles for team members and then helps them to become competent in achieving those roles.
Page 46
Transparency 11-46Transparency 11-46© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsImplementing Teams
• The role of facilitator is very important in managing teams, particularly when team members have little prior experience with teamwork.
• The role of facilitator is to make it easy for the group to know where they are going, know why they want to get there, know how to get there, and know what they’re going to do next.
• Successful facilitation does not mean that the group always achieves its desire results.
Page 47
Transparency 11-47Transparency 11-47© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsImplementing Teams
• The facilitator should: -- plan how the group will work through a task, -- help the group stay on track and be productive, -- draw out quiet members, -- discourage mono-polizers, -- help develop clear and shared understanding, -- watch body language and verbal cues, -- help the group to achieve closure, -- remain neutral on content, -- help key members reach points of agreement.
Page 48
Transparency 11-48Transparency 11-48© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsSlide 2 of 3
Implementing TeamsSlide 2 of 3
• Meeting Management– Effective meeting management is an important
skill for a facilitator of quality improvement teams.
– Tools for successful meting management include an agenda, pre-determined objectives for the meeting, a process for running the meeting, process for voting, and development of an action plan.
Page 49
Transparency 11-49Transparency 11-49© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsImplementing Teams
• Meeting Management– The steps required for meeting management are:
1. Defining an agenda.
2. Developing meeting objectives.
3. Designing the agenda activity outline.
4. Using process techniques.
Page 50
Transparency 11-50Transparency 11-50© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsImplementing Teams
• We wish meetings to stay focused: -- to involve deeper exploration, -- to separate creative from evaluative activities, -- To provide equal opportunity for contribution, -- to encourage reflection, -- to provide objective ground rules to reduce
defensiveness, and -- to separate the person from the idea.
. Figure 11.5 identifies some meeting structured process techniques.
Page 51
Transparency 11-51Transparency 11-51© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsImplementing Teams
• Figure 11.5 Structured process activities
Page 52
Transparency 11-52Transparency 11-52© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsImplementing Teams
• Tools such as flipcharts, sticky dots, whiteboards, and Post-its are commonly used in structured process activities.
• Another useful meeting tool that was pioneered by HP is the “ parking lot” ( please see Figure 11.6).
Page 53
Transparency 11-53Transparency 11-53© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Implementing TeamsSlide 3 of 3
Implementing TeamsSlide 3 of 3
• Figure 11.6 Parking Lot
Page 54
Transparency 11-54Transparency 11-54© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Conflict Resolution in TeamsConflict Resolution in Teams
• Conflict resolution as an organizational means to create a quality culture, and also a hugely important topic for team leaders and members.
• It is claimed that team leaders and project managers spend more 20% of their time resolving conflict.
• Some conflicts are internal or external.
• It is interesting to note that these are also some of the reasons teams are successful.
Page 55
Transparency 11-55Transparency 11-55© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Conflict Resolution in TeamsSlide 1 of 3
Conflict Resolution in TeamsSlide 1 of 3
• Stages in the Conflict Resolution Process– Frustration. People are at odds, and
competition or aggression ensues.
– Conceptualization and Orientation. Opponents identify the issues that need to be resolved.
– Interaction. Team members discuss and air the problems.
– Outcome. The problem is resolved.
Page 56
Transparency 11-56Transparency 11-56© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Conflict Resolution in TeamsConflict Resolution in Teams
• Given the conflict-handling styles such as competing, accommodating, avoiding, compromising, and collaboration, we have ways of handling conflict.
• Figure 11.7 presents different styles of handling conflict.
• Some methods for solving conflict are presented in Table 11.4.
Page 57
Transparency 11-57Transparency 11-57© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Conflict Resolution in TeamsSlide 2 of 3
Conflict Resolution in TeamsSlide 2 of 3
Desire to satisfy other party’s concerns
Low
Low
High
High
Desire to satisfy our
own customers
Avoiding Accommodating
Compromising
Competing Collaborating
Figure 11.7 Modes of Conflict Behavior Figure 11.7 Modes of Conflict Behavior
Page 58
Transparency 11-58Transparency 11-58© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Conflict Resolution in TeamsSlide 3 of 3
Conflict Resolution in TeamsSlide 3 of 3
Table 11.4 Methods for Resolving Conflict
Avoidance
Defusion
Confrontation Problem-solving
Smoothing
Compromise
Non-attention
Physical separation
Limited interaction
Page 59
Transparency 11-59Transparency 11-59© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Saving Quality Teams From Failure
Saving Quality Teams From Failure
• Sometimes quality improvement teams embark on improvement projects and for whatever reason, things begin to fall apart and the team risks failure.
• Figure 11.8 shows the diagnosis-intervention cycle that must be undertaken by the facilitator, team leader, of the team members themselves.
Page 60
Transparency 11-60Transparency 11-60© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Saving Quality Teams From Failure
Saving Quality Teams From Failure
• Figure 11.8 Diagnosis-intervention cycle
Page 61
Transparency 11-61Transparency 11-61© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Too often, companies attempt to implement teams and projects in a poorly planned manner.
• We introduce the tools used in controlling projects in order of sequence.
Page 62
Transparency 11-62Transparency 11-62© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 1 of 4
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 1 of 4
• Project Charters– Are simple tools to help teams identify
objectives, participants, and expected benefits from projects.
– The charter includes spaces for signatures to identify reporting relationships for planning purposes.
– Figure 11.9 shows a charter for an actual project.
Page 63
Transparency 11-63Transparency 11-63© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Figure 11.9 An actual project charter
Page 64
Transparency 11-64Transparency 11-64© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 2 of 4
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 2 of 4
• Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)– After chartering the project, the next step is to
begin planning the project. – The work breakdown structure that was
introduced in Chapter 10 is an excellent tool for determining the tasks to be done.
– Figure 11.10 shows an outline of a WBS for a project.
– The task for an actual project are listed in Table 11.5.
Page 65
Transparency 11-65Transparency 11-65© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Figure 11.10 Work breakdown structure
Page 66
Transparency 11-66Transparency 11-66© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Table 11.5 Tasks for the document checklist project
Page 67
Transparency 11-67Transparency 11-67© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• It is important to note that with large projects, it is often best to develop a separate WBS for each of the major tasks because separate individuals or group may be involved in different tasks.
• In the end, these WBSs must be combined into an overall WBS for the project.
Page 68
Transparency 11-68Transparency 11-68© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Identifying Precedence Relationships
• Identifying Outcome Measures
• Identifying Task Times
2
1
22
22t )6/)((
b)/64m(a timeExpected
TT
n
ttT
ab
Page 69
Transparency 11-69Transparency 11-69© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Example 11.1: Calculating task times and variance
Page 70
Transparency 11-70Transparency 11-70© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 3 of 4
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 3 of 4
• Arrow Gantt Charts– Tool used for controlling team projects. Most
college textbooks treat PERT charts separately from Gantt charts. In Chapter 11, both PERT and Gantt charts are demonstrated
– Using the data given in Table 11.5, the PERT chart for the document checklist project is as shown in Figure 11.11.
Page 71
Transparency 11-71Transparency 11-71© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Figure 11.11 Project PERT chart showing tasks needed to perform the document checklist project
Page 72
Transparency 11-72Transparency 11-72© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• PERT Charts– PERT charts and the critical path method
(CPM) are introduced in Chapter 10 with the new seven tools of quality.
– PERT/CPW continues to be the preferred tool for controlling projects.
– The PERT charts shows a project is likely to be completed on time.
– PERT/CPM was very useful in improving quality at one publishing company.
Page 73
Transparency 11-73Transparency 11-73© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 4 of 4
Managing and Controlling Projects
Slide 4 of 4
• Managing Multiple Projects– At times, several projects occur simultaneously
in a firm.
– The multiple projects control form in Figure 11.12 is a management tool to aid in the coordination of multiple projects in a firm.
– Notice that the form identifies participants with varying levels of responsibility as well as the project managers.
Page 74
Transparency 11-74Transparency 11-74© 2001 Prentice-Hall© 2001 Prentice-Hall
Managing and Controlling Projects
Managing and Controlling Projects
• Figure 11.12 Multiple project control form