CHAPTER 9 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: INCOME TAXES, CASH FLOWS, AND INSTALLMENT ACQUISITIONS The title of each problem is followed by the estimated time in minutes required for completion and by a difficulty rating. The time estimates are applicable for students using the partially filled-in working papers. Pr. 9–1 Pro Corporation and Primrose Corporation (40 minutes, medium) Working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, for intercompany profits on merchandise sales and gain on extinguishment of bonds. Pr. 9-2 Pullet Corporation (40 minutes, medium) Given working paper eliminations for intercompany bonds and related deferred income taxes on date of bonds acquisition, prepare journal entries for intercompany interest revenue and expense for the following year and working paper eliminations (in journal entry format) at the end of the following year. Pr. 9–3 Presto Corporation (40 minutes, medium) Preparation of journal entries for business combination that is a tax-free corporate reorganization for income tax purposes. Pr. 9–4 Pellerin Corporation (40 minutes, medium) Journal entries to account for parent company’s installment investments in subsidiary by the equity method. Income taxes are disregarded. Pr. 9–5 Porcelain Corporation (45 minutes, medium) Preparation of consolidated statement of cash flows (indirect method) for parent company and partially owned subsidiary. Pr. 9–6 Parkhurst Corporation (55 minutes, strong) Working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, for intercompany profits (gains) in inventories, machinery, land, and bonds. Pr. 9–7 Paine Corporation (70 minutes, strong) Parent company journal entries for equity method and for income taxes attributable to equity method, with respect to two subsidiaries. Preparation of working paper for consolidated financial statements and working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, disregarding the dividend-received deduction. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 Solutions Manual, Chapter 9 299
39
Embed
Chapter 09, Modern Advanced accounting-review Q & exr
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CHAPTER 9CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: INCOME
TAXES, CASH FLOWS, AND INSTALLMENT ACQUISITIONS
The title of each problem is followed by the estimated time in minutes required for completion and by a difficulty rating. The time estimates are applicable for students using the partially filled-in working papers.
Pr. 9–1 Pro Corporation and Primrose Corporation (40 minutes, medium)
Working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, for intercompany profits on merchandise sales and gain on extinguishment of bonds.
Pr. 9-2 Pullet Corporation (40 minutes, medium)
Given working paper eliminations for intercompany bonds and related deferred income taxes on date of bonds acquisition, prepare journal entries for intercompany interest revenue and expense for the following year and working paper eliminations (in journal entry format) at the end of the following year.
Pr. 9–3 Presto Corporation (40 minutes, medium)
Preparation of journal entries for business combination that is a tax-free corporate reorganization for income tax purposes.
Pr. 9–4 Pellerin Corporation (40 minutes, medium)
Journal entries to account for parent company’s installment investments in subsidiary by the equity method. Income taxes are disregarded.
Pr. 9–5 Porcelain Corporation (45 minutes, medium)
Preparation of consolidated statement of cash flows (indirect method) for parent company and partially owned subsidiary.
Pr. 9–6 Parkhurst Corporation (55 minutes, strong)
Working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, for intercompany profits (gains) in inventories, machinery, land, and bonds.
Pr. 9–7 Paine Corporation (70 minutes, strong)
Parent company journal entries for equity method and for income taxes attributable to equity method, with respect to two subsidiaries. Preparation of working paper for consolidated financial statements and working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, disregarding the dividend-received deduction.
Pr. 9–8 Pickens Corporation (80 minutes, strong)
Working paper for consolidated financial statements and working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, for parent company and subsidiary acquired in installments. The dividend-received deduction is disregarded.
Pr. 9–9 Plummer Corporation (80 minutes, strong)
Adjusting entries for income tax allocation for parent company using equity method of accounting. Working paper for consolidated financial statements and working paper eliminations (in journal entry format), including income tax allocation, for parent company and subsidiary having bargain purchase excess. The 80% dividend-received deduction applies.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006Solutions Manual, Chapter 9 299
ANSWERS TO REVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Income taxes enter into the measurement of current fair values of a combinee’s identifiable net assets if the business combination is a tax-free corporate reorganization for income tax purposes. In such a combination, a new basis of accounting may not be required for the combinee’s assets for income tax purposes; thus, a deferred income tax asset or liability is recognized for the tax effects of current fair value differences.
2. In FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the Financial Accounting Standards Board required the provision of deferred income tax liabilities for the undistributed earnings of domestic subsidiaries of parent companies.
3. No, income tax allocation procedures are not necessary in working paper eliminations for a parent company and subsidiaries that file consolidated income tax returns. Intercompany profits (gains) and losses are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated income tax returns just as they are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated financial statements.
4. The consolidated deferred income tax asset associated with the intercompany gain on the parent company’s sale of a depreciable plant asset to the subsidiary reverses as the subsidiary recognizes depreciation expense of the asset. The portion of the subsidiary’s depreciation expense attributable to the intercompany gain is in effect a realization of the gain; thus, the deferred tax related to the depreciation expense is an expense of the consolidated entity.
5. Only cash dividends paid by a partially owned subsidiary to minority stockholders are reported with cash flows from financing activities in a consolidated statement of cash flows.
6. The equity method of accounting generally must be applied when the parent company’s investment in the eventual subsidiary totals 20% or more of the investee’s outstanding common stock. Absent evidence to the contrary, APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock,” considers a 20% investment sufficient enable the investor to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee, which underlies application of the equity method.
7. The most logical point for ascertaining the current fair values of a subsidiary’s net assets is when the parent company obtains a substantial percentage of the subsidiary’s common stock during the course of an installment acquisition of the stock. Until that time, the parent company’s acquisition costs for small blocks of the eventual subsidiary’s common stock generally may not be reliable indicators of the current fair values of the eventual subsidiary’s identifiable net assets.
8. Included in consolidated retained earnings on the date of a business combination that involves the installment acquisition of the subsidiary’s outstanding common stock are both the parent company’s retained earnings and the parent’s share of the increase or decrease in the subsidiary’s retained earnings during the “influenced investee” phase of the affiliation.
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
Ex. 9–1 1. b 8. d2. a 9. d3. b 10. c4. a 11. d5. d 12. b6. a 13. c7. c
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006300 Modern Advanced Accounting, 10/e
Ex. 9–2 Computation of deferred income tax liability related to Salvo Corporation’s building on date of merger:
Current fair value of building $150,000Less: Carrying amount (tax basis) of building 90,000Current fair value difference $60,000Income tax rate 40%Deferred income tax liability related to building ($60,000 x 0.40) $24,000
Ex. 9–3 Journal entries for Combinor Corporation, May 31, 2005:
Investment in Net Assets of Combinee Company 560,000Cash 560,000
Investment in Net Assets of Combinee Company 60,000Cash 60,000
Other Current Assets 300,000Plant Assets (net) 780,000Intangible Assets (net) 130,000Goodwill ($620,000 – $570,000) 50,000
Liabilities 620,000Deferred Income Tax Liability ($50,000 x 0.40) 20,000Investment in Net Assets of Combinee Company 620,000
Ex. 9–4 Journal entries for Prudence Corporation, Oct. 31, 2006:
Investment in Sagacity Company Common Stock ($140,000 x 0.70) 98,000
Intercompany Investment Income 98,000
Cash ($50,000 x 0.70) 35,000Investment in Sagacity Company Common Stock 35,000
Income Taxes Expense {[($98,000 – $35,000 – $4,000 tax- deductible goodwill amortization) x 0.20] x 0.40} 4,720
Income Taxes Payable [($35,000 x 0.20) x 0.40] 2,800Deferred Income Tax Liability 1,920
Ex. 9–5 Working paper eliminations for Ponte Corporation and subsidiaries, Oct. 31, 2006:
Retained EarningsShipp ($35,000 x 40/140) 10,000Intercompany SalesShipp 630,000
Intercompany Cost of Goods SoldShipp ($630,000 x 100/140) 450,000Cost of Goods SoldStack ($588,000 x 40/140) 168,000InventoriesStack ($77,000 x 40/140) 22,000
Deferred Income Tax AssetShipp ($22,000 x 0.40) 8,800Income Taxes ExpenseShipp 8,800
Income Taxes ExpenseShipp ($10,000 x 0.40) 4,000Retained EarningsShipp 4,000
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006Solutions Manual, Chapter 9 301
Ex. 9–6 Working paper eliminations for Pederson Corporation and subsidiary, Nov. 30, 2006:
Retained EarningsPederson ($20,000 x 0.20) 4,000Intercompany SalesPederson 125,000
Intercompany Cost of Goods SoldPederson 100,000Cost of Goods SoldSolomon ($115,000 x 0.20) 23,000InventoriesSolomon ($30,000 x 0.20) 6,000
To eliminate intercompany sales, costs of goods sold, and unrealized profit in inventories.
Deferred Income Tax AssetPederson ($6,000 x 0.40) 2,400Income Taxes ExpensePederson 2,400
To defer income taxes provided on separate income tax returns of parent company applicable to unrealized intercompany profits in subsidiary’s inventories on Nov. 30, 2006:
Income Taxes ExpensePederson ($4,000 x 0.40) 1,600Retained EarningsPederson 1,600
To provide for income taxes attributable to realized intercompany profits in subsidiary’s inventories on Nov. 30, 2005.
Ex. 9–7 Working paper eliminations for Pol Corporation and subsidiaries, Oct. 31, 2006:
Retained EarningsSol ($20,000 x 0.80) 16,000Minority Interest in Net Assets of Sol Company ($20,000 x 0.20) 4,000Intercompany SalesSol 400,000
Intercompany Cost of Goods SoldSol 300,000Cost of Goods SoldStu 97,500InventoriesStu 22,500
Deferred Income Tax AssetSol ($22,500 x 0.40) 9,000Income Taxes ExpenseSol 9,000
Income Taxes ExpenseSol ($20,000 x 0.40) 8,000Retained EarningsSol ($16,000 x 0.40) 6,400Minority Interest in Net Assets of Sol Company ($4,000 x 0.40) 1,600
Ex. 9–8 Working paper eliminations for Purdue Corporation and subsidiary, Feb. 28, 2007:
Income Taxes ExpensePurdue ($2,000 x0.40) 800Deferred Income Tax AssetScarsdale ($4,800 – $800) 4,000
Retained EarningsPurdue ($12,000 x 0.40) 4,800
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006302 Modern Advanced Accounting, 10/e
Ex. 9–9 Additional working paper eliminations for Pegler Corporation and subsidiary, Oct. 31, 2006:
Deferred Income Tax AssetStang ($70,000 x 0.40) 28,000Income Taxes ExpenseStang 28,000
Income Taxes ExpenseStang ($10,000 x 0.40) 4,000Retained EarningsStang 4,000
Income Taxes ExpensePegler ($20,000 x 0.40) 8,000Deferred Income Tax AssetPegler 8,000
Retained EarningsPegler ($40,000 x 0.40) 16,000
Ex. 9–10 a. Working paper eliminations for Panama Corporation and subsidiary, Oct. 31, 2006:
Intercompany Gain on Sale of PatentSalvador 5,000PatentPanama 5,000
To eliminate unrealized intercompany gain on sale of patent ($20,000 – $15,000 = $5,000).
Deferred Income Tax AssetSalvador 2,000Income Taxes Expense Salvador 2,000
To defer income taxes provided on separate income tax returns of subsidiary applicable to intercompany profit in parent’s patent on Oct. 31, 2006 ($5,000 x 0.40 = $2,000).
b. Working paper eliminations for Panama Corporation and subsidiary, Oct. 31, 2007:
Retained EarningsSalvador ($5,000 x 0.80) 4,000Minority Interest in Net Assets of Subsidiary ($5,000 x 0.20) 1,000Accumulated Amortization of PatentPanama ($5,000 5) 1,000
To eliminate unrealized intercompany gain in patent and in related amortization.
Income Taxes ExpenseSalvador 400Deferred Income Tax AssetSalvador ($2,000 – $400) 1,600
Retained EarningsSalvador ($2,000 x 0.80) 1,600Minority Interest in Net Assets of Subsidiary ($2,000 x 0.20) 400
To provide for income tax expense on intercompany gain realized through parent company’s amortization ($2,000 5 years = $400); and to defer income taxes attributable to remainder of unrealized intercompany gain.
Ex. 9–11 Working paper elimination for Plumm Corporation and subsidiary, Mar. 31, 2006:
Retained EarningsSam ($21,124 x 0.40) 8,450Income Taxes ExpenseSam [($45,645 – $42,981) x 0.40] 1,066Deferred Income Tax LiabilitySam ($8,450 – $1,066) 7,384
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006Solutions Manual, Chapter 9 303
Ex. 9–12 Computation of missing amounts in working paper eliminations of Pom Corporation and subsidiary:
(1) and (2) $26,403 ($66,007 x 0.40)
(3) $26,403 ($66,007 x 0.40)
(4) $1,420 [($57,107 – $53,558) x 0.40]
(5) $24,983 ($26,403 – $1,420)
Ex. 9–13 Computation of cash flows for payment of dividends for Prieto Corporation and subsidiary:
Cash dividends paid by Prieto Corporation $250,000Cash dividends paid by Sora Company on $5 cumulative preferred stock owned by minority stockholders 25,000Cash dividends paid by Sano Company to minority stockholders ($44,000 x 0.25) 11,000
Total cash flows for payments of dividends $286,000
Ex. 9–14 1. A-O 8. A-O2. N 9. D-O3. N 10. IA4. FA 11. N5. N 12. N6. IA 13. FA7. D-O
Ex. 9–15 Journal entries for Packard Corporation, two years ended July 31, 2004:
2005Aug. 1 Investment in Stenn Company Common Stock 5,000
Cash 5,0002006July 31 Cash 300
Dividends Revenue ($3,000 x 0.10) 300
Aug. 1 Investment in Stenn Company Common Stock 22,500Cash 22,500
2007July 31 Investment in Stenn Company Common Stock 4,125
Intercompany Investment Income ($7,500 x 0.55) 4,125
CASES
Case 9–1 Given that the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” to replace a previously issued statement with the same title that never became fully effective, it is not inappropriate for critics such as student Laura to question the FASB’s conclusions in Statement No. 109. The increase in goodwill occasioned by the recognition of a deferred income tax liability in a business combination, for differences between financial accounting valuations and tax bases of a combinee’s identifiable assets, exacerbates the problem associated with the residual measurement of the goodwill. A serious shortcoming of FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations,” is the “thou shalt” language in paragraph 43 thereof: “The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed shall be recognized as an asset referred to as goodwill” (emphasis added). Although the FASB
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006304 Modern Advanced Accounting, 10/e
dealt with the thorny question of the nature and appropriate valuation of goodwill in both FASB Statement No. 141 and FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Tangible Assets,” critics such as Laura will continue to find fault with FASB Statement No. 109.
Case 9–2 The Paddock Corporation controller’s interpretation of generally accepted accounting principles for undistributed earnings of domestic subsidiaries is erroneous. FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” is quite specific in requiring the recognition of a deferred income tax liability for an excess of the financial reporting carrying amount of an investment in a domestic subsidiary over its tax basis. No exception is provided for the possibility of dividends being omitted by such a subsidiary because of a severe cash shortage.
Case 9–3 One possible alternative to the recognition of multiple amounts of goodwill in business combinations accomplished in installments would be the immediate expensing of such “goodwill” amounts until control of the combinee is obtained by the combinor/parent company. Only on the date of obtaining control would goodwill be recognized in accordance with accounting for business combinations. Another possible alternative would be the display of goodwill-type amounts as an offset element in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheet.
Case 9–4 There is no clear answer to the question as to whether a valuation allowance should be provided for the $400,000 deferred tax asset of Pantheon Corporation and subsidiary. In FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” paragraph 17(e), the FASB defined more likely than not, with respect to ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset, as a likelihood of more than 50%. Clearly, if Synthesis Company sold to an outsider the land that had been acquired from Pantheon Corporation, the $400,000 deferred tax asset would be realized. However, is there a likelihood of more than 50% that Synthesis will make such a sale in the near future?
An alternative view might consider that, once the new factory building constructed on the land is in production and generating revenue, the deferred tax asset would thereby be realized indirectly.
A compromise position might be to provide no valuation allowance for the $400,000 deferred tax asset and to include a note to consolidated financial statements such as the following, adapted from paragraph A-44 of Statement of Position 94-6, “Disclosure of Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties”:
The consolidated company has recognized a deferred tax asset of $400,000 as a result of the taxable gain on the company’s sale of land for a factory site to its subsidiary. Realization of the deferred tax asset depends on the profitability of the subsidiary’s factory, or, alternatively, on the subsidiary’s sale of the land to an outsider at a gain. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the entire deferred tax asset will be realized.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006Solutions Manual, Chapter 9 305
40 Minutes, MediumPro Corporation and Primrose Corporation Pr. 9–1
a. Pro Corporation and Subsidiaries
Working Paper Eliminations
October 31, 2006(b) Retained Earnings—Spa 2 5 0 0 0
Intercompany Sales—Spa 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Intercompany Cost of Goods Sold—Spa 1 5 0 0 0 0 0
Cost of Goods Sold—Sol 4 5 0 0 0 0
Inventories—Sol 7 5 0 0 0
To eliminate intercompany sales, cost of goods sold,
and unrealized intercompany profit in inventories.
(c) Deferred Income Tax Asset—Spa 3 0 0 0 0
Income Taxes Expense—Spa 3 0 0 0 0
To defer income taxes provided on separate income
tax returns of Spa applicable to unrealized
intercompany profits in Sol’s inventories on Oct. 31,
2006 ($75,000 x 0.40 = $30,000).
(d) Income Taxes Expense—Spa 1 0 0 0 0
Retained Earnings—Spa 1 0 0 0 0
To provide for income taxes attributed to realized
intercompany profits in Sol’s inventories on Oct. 31,
2005 ($25,000 x 0.40 = $10,000).
b. Primrose Corporation and SubsidiaryWorking Paper Eliminations
October 31, 2006(b) Intercompany Interest Revenue—Primrose ($770,602
* A decrease in accumulated depreciation and an increase in total assets.† A decrease in discount and an increase in total liabilities & stockholders’ equity.
Note to Instructor: Intercompany receivables (payables) are: