Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 1 CHANGING PARADIGMS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Professor Jayashree Sadri and Dr Sorab Sadri
Jan 22, 2015
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 1
CHANGING PARADIGMS OF
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Professor Jayashree Sadriand
Dr Sorab Sadri
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 2
BASIS
This program is an extension of the argument in Sadri, Jayashree and Ajgaonkar Geometry of HR (2002) and extended in Jayashree, Sadri and Dastoor Theory and Practice of Managerial Ethics (2008).
It has borrowed from sopme doctoral work conducted under the guidance of Dr Sadri between 2004 and 2008
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 3
SOME BASICS
Theory is an abstraction of reality that seeks to explain reality. If a theory does not explain reality it is a quasi theory, a meta theory or not a theory at all.
The distinction between theory and practice thus disappears.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 4
PARADIGM
The noted philosopher Thomas Kuhn gave this word its contemporary meaning when he adopted it to refer to the set of practices that define a scientific discipline during a particular period of time
His work The Theory of Scientific Revolutions (1962) in truly path breaking.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 5
SHIFTING POSITIONS
Paradigm shift is the term first used by Thomas Kuhn in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions to describe a change in basic assumptions within the ruling theory of science. It is in contrast to his idea of normal science.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 6
ELEMENTS OF A PARADIGMKuhn defines a scientific paradigm as:
what is to be observed and scrutinized, kind of questions that are supposed to be asked and
probed for answers in relation to this subject, how these questions are to be structured, how the results of scientific investigations should be
interpreted
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 7
OUR INQUIRY
Based on a detailed review of published literature and some on going doctoral research, we examined the various elements of the paradigm of CSR.
This led us to conclude that there was a visible shift.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 8
UNDERSTANDING C. S. R.
Corporate Social Responsibility is not the latest bullet or business fad, it is not a philanthropic idea. It is an international imperative for both business and the countries we are operating in.
Maureen C. Shaw, President & CEO (2005) IAPA (Industrial Accident Prevention
Association)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 9
Some Concepts in Business Society Interface
Corporate Social Responsibility (Bowen, 1953) Corporate Social Performance (Carroll, 1979)
Corporate Citizenship (Altman,1998)
Corporate Social Responsiveness (Frederick, 1986)
Triple Bottom Line & Sustainability (Elkington,1998)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 10
Linkages in Corporate Management
Source: CSR Quest
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 11
CONCEPT OF CSR
The concept of CSR has its origins in the Book by Harold Bowen – Social Responsibilities of the Businessman whom Carroll (1999) takes to be the father of CSR
CSR concept is primitive to all other concepts in
business society interface field (Carroll,1999).
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 12
VARIED PERCEPTIONS OF CSR
CSR means something, but not always the same
thing to every body. To some it conveys the idea of
legal responsibility or liability ; to others it means
socially responsible behavior in the ethical sense ;
to still others the meaning transmitted is that of
'responsible for' in a causal mode ; many simply
equate it with charitable contributions ;a few see it
as a sort of fiduciary duty imposing higher
standards of behavior on businessman than on
citizens at large (Votow, 1972 )as quoted by Elisabet
Garriga et al (2004)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 13
VARIED PERCEPTIONS OF CSR An eclectic field with loose boundaries;
broadly than focused, multidisciplinary; wide breadth; brings in wider range of literature ;and interdisciplinary (Carroll, 1994)
The very nature of CSR has led to a plethora of approaches and definitions of the concept.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 14
SOME DEFINITIONS OF CSR "decisions and actions taken for reasons at least partially
beyond the firm's direct economic or technical interest." Davis (1960)
"problems that arise when corporate enterprise casts its shadow on the social scene, and the ethical principles that ought to govern the relationship between the corporation and society" Eells and Walton (1961) .
"The basic idea of corporate social responsibility is that business and society are interwoven rather than distinct entities; therefore, society has certain expectations for appropriate business behavior and outcomes." Wood (1991)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 15
SOME DEFINITIONS OF CSR
Situations where the firm goes beyond compliance and engages in ‘actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law’ McWilliams and Siegel (2001)
"The CSR firm should strive to make a profit, obey the law, be ethical and be a good corporate citizen.” Carroll (1999).
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 16
IMPORTANT APPROACHES TO CSR ‘Government’s job is not business, and business’s job is not
government’ Theodore Levitt (1958). The neo-classical view of the firm that essentially states that
maximizing shareholder value is pre-eminent and CSR is irrelevant. Milton Friedman (1962)
The stakeholder view espoused by R Edward Freeman (1984) that managers must satisfy a variety of constituents (e.g. workers, customers, suppliers, local community organizations) who can influence firm outcomes.
Donaldson and Davis, (1991) proposed the stewardship theory based on the idea that there is a moral imperative for managers to ‘do the right thing’, without regard to how such decisions affect firm financial performance.
Archie Carroll (1999) took a community service view of CSR Recent theories of CSR (Baron (2001), McWilliams and Siegel (2001),
Bagnoli and Watts (2003) assert that firms engage in “profit-maximizing” CSR
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 17
IMPORTANT APPROACHES TO CSR
Stakeholders outside the stockholder group are viewed as means to the ends of maximizing shareholder wealth (Kenneth Goodpaster, 1996).
The idea is that while being socially responsible often entails short-run sacrifice and even pain, it usually ultimately results in long-long-gain. Expenditures on strategic CSR activities should properly be viewed as investments in a “Goodwill Bank” (Vaughn, 1999) which yields financial returns (McWilliams and Siegel, 2001).
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 18
THE LOGIC
Scholars have traditionally disassociated ethics from business (both philosophically and empirically) while stressing that the practice of business ethics is a management option based on a given value system of the corporate entity.
We have questioned this position.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 19
OUR DEFINITIONAL PREMISE
WE HAVE SOUGHT TO DEFINE OUR POSITION BASED ON THREE PREMISES
Approach : Shareholder Primacy Vs Stakeholder Management
Nature: Voluntary / Obligatory / Mandatory Motive: Moral Duty (Altruistic) Vs Competitive
advantage (Strategic)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 20
TWO FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES
CSR is defined as a voluntary verifiable continuing commitment by business to contribute to development of the quality of life of the stakeholders and society at large.
CSR elements Social Welfare Stakeholder management Voluntary Nature
It is the moral duty of business regardless of the impact it would have on the firm profitability (Normative Altruistic approach)
CSR helps corporations gain some competitive advantage and can be strategically used to gain competitive advantage (Positive Strategic Approach)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 21
ALTRUISTIC APPROACH Corporate constitutionalism focusing on a responsible use of
business power. Social responsibilities of businesses arise from the amount of social power that they have Davis (1960, 1967)
Integrative Social Contract Theory Assumes that a social contract between business and society exists Donaldson and Dunfee (1994, 1999)
Corporate (or business) citizenship where a firm is understood as being like a citizen with certain involvement in the community Wood and Lodgson (2002), Matten and Crane (2005)
CSP theories Search for social legitimacy and processes to give appropriate responses to social issues Carroll (1979), Wartick and Cochran (1985), Wood (1991)
Stakeholder normative theory Considers fiduciary duties towards stakeholders of the firm. Its application requires reference to some moral theory (Kantian, Utilitarianism, theories of justice, etc.) Freeman (1984, 1994), Evan and Freeman (1988), Donaldson and Preston (1995)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 22
STRATEGIC APPROACH
Maximization of shareholder value, Long-term value maximization Friedman (1970), Jensen (2000)
Social investments in a competitive context Porter and Kramer (2002)
Strategies based on the natural resource view of the firm and the dynamic capabilities of the firm Hart (1995)
Strategies for the bottom of the economic pyramid Prahalad Prahalad and Hammond (2002), Prahalad (2003)and Hammond (2002), Prahalad (2003)
Cause-related marketing Altruistic activities, socially recognized, used as an instrument of marketing Varadarajan and Menon (1988), Murray and Montanari (1986)
Strategic CSR Baron (2001), McWilliams and Segel (2000)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 23
DEFINING ALTRUISTIC CSR
According to Lantos (2001) the term altruistic or humanitarian CSR suggest genuine optional caring, even at possible personal or organizational sacrifice.
Humanitarian CSR is Carroll’s “fourth face” of CSR—philanthropic responsibilities—to be a “good corporate citizen” by “giving back” to society, furthering some social good, regardless of whether the firm will financially reap what it has spiritually sown. It demands that corporations help alleviate “public welfare deficiencies” (Brenkert, 1996)
The most basic justification for Altruistic CSR is the social contract argument that “Business is a major social institution that should bear the same kinds of citizenship costs for society that an individual citizen bears” (Davis, 1983)
Unlike strategic CSR, where it is believed that the money put into good works will yield a return on investment for the business, with altruistic CSR this is not the motive (although the firm could conceivably benefit as a byproduct).
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 24
DEFINING STRATEGIC CSR
Strategic CSR or “strategic philanthropy” (Carroll, 2001) is done to
accomplish strategic business goals—good deeds are believed to be
good for business as well as for society. With strategic CSR,
corporations “give back” to their constituencies because they believe
it to be in their best financial interests to do so. This is “philanthropy
aligned with profit motives” (Quester and Thompson, 2001) social
goals might be profitable in the long run since market forces provide
financial incentives for perceived socially responsible behavior.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 25
STRATEGIC VS ALTRUISTIC CSR
What distinguishes Strategic CSR and Altruistic
CSR is the motive of the managers adopting
CSR. If the motive is gaining some kind of
advantage for the company, it is strategic CSR
and absence of any such motive would classify
the CSR programmes as altruistic CSR.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 26
SHIFTING PARADIGMS:FROM ALTRUISTIC TO STRATEGIC: Evidences in Literature
Review of literature suggest globally there is a strong trend towards strategic CSR.
Indian CSR has traditionally been altruistic in nature but there are indications of a shift towards strategic intent. The Indian CSR approach has been shifting from the purely normative philanthropic CSR to stakeholder engagement and strategic use of CSR (Chahoud et al ,2007)
Boatright (2000) States that the wisdom of strategic CSR is seen in the fact that some of the most successful corporations are also among the most socially responsible.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 27
SHIFTING PARADIGMS:FROM ALTRUISTIC TO STRATEGIC: Further Evidences in Literature
Carroll (2001) argues that due to belt tightening and increased pressure on accountability for expenditures, the trend will likely be towards funding those good works expected to financially benefit the companies.
Geoffrey P Lantos (2001) while making a case or strategic CSR argues that in view of the rising public expectations for corporate good works, returns to strategic CSR should rise. He strongly emphasized the need to identify critical stakeholders and CSR practices which would further the strategic interests of the companies
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 28
CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON CSR
Author Perspective Year
1953 Bowen Altruistic
1970 Davis Altruistic
1984 Freeman Altruistic
1991 Wood Altruistic
1995 Donaldson and Preston Strategic and Altruistic
1995 Jones Strategic
1995 Hart Strategic
2001 Baron Strategic
2001 McWilliams and Siegel Strategic
2003 Bangoli and Watts Strategic
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 29
SHIFTING PARADIGMS:
FROM ALTRUISTIC TO STRATEGIC (Evidences from Industry)
CSR Survey 2002 India ITC's e-Chaupal initiative HLL's ( HUL) Packaging revolution Gramin Bank, Bangladesh
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 30
THE CONTINUUM OF CSR FROM ALTRUISTIC TO STRATEGIC
Corporate Charity Corporate Philanthropy The Good Corporate Citizen CSR as a select strategy Strategic CSR
Charity Strategic CSR
Company ($) Society Company ($) Society($)
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 31
REASONS FOR THE SHIFT
Legitimacy Sustainability Efficiency and Effectiveness
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 32
Conclusions
Given the changing form and content of market competition, CSR is no longer a management option but a strategic imperative.
Corporate strategists have realized this and are integrating CSR in their core business strategy.
The distinction between ethics and business disappears with the advent of strategic CSR.
Jayashree Sadri and Sorab Sadri 33
So
What role do you like to you can play in promoting CSR?
What role do you feel you can play in promoting CSR?
What occasions this gap?
Thank You