CHANGE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MAKERERE-SIDA BILATERAL COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM (2010 – 2014) ANNUAL PLANNING MEETING 2014 10 th March, 2014 Prof Buyinza Mukadasi Director, Research & Graduate Training
Jan 19, 2016
CHANGE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
MAKERERE-SIDA BILATERAL COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM (2010 – 2014)
ANNUAL PLANNING MEETING 201410th March, 2014
Prof Buyinza MukadasiDirector, Research & Graduate Training
Why Annual Planning Meetings?
• Discuss Activity plans for the coming year
• Discuss Procurement plans for the coming year
• Discuss Progress and Results• Agree on needed reallocations
Aim of the program
“To support the existing structures andencourage the development of new structuresthat create an environment that is conducive for research and research training and in so doing assist to identify and improveupon structures that hinder university research.”
Under the slogan “To support the supervisor tosupervise”
through collaboration with universities in Sweden or elsewhere
How to fulfill the mission
4
• Utilise world wide and local human resources
• Utilise information and technology• Collaborate with other institutions of
higher learning, research and organisations
• Mobilise financial resources
• University setting its own research agenda• Researchers identifying their own research questions• University/researchers identifying collaborating
Swedish and other counterparts• University managing the financial contribution• University owning the program• Using the opportunities of the program to enhance
research, teaching and management within the WHOLE university
Hallmark of Sida’s support to Makerere
6
Strategic Research AgendaStrategic Research Agenda• Health and Health systems• Agricultural (crop & Livestock) transformation, Food
Security, nutrition and value addition• Sustainable environment, Natural Resources Governance
and Climate Change• Governance, Culture, Social Justice and Sustainable
development• ICT for developmentCross-cutting areas• Biotechnology• Knowledge transfer• Gender• Human Resource Development
7
.Mak’s Strategic Objectives
8
• To produce qualified lecturers motivated to do more research and building research teams around themselves
• To increase the number of potential PhDs at supported units
• To enhance research throughout the whole university
• To enhance the capacity for research coordination and programme administration at Directorate of Research & Graduate Training
Capacity Objectives
9
• Support to individual units – Provide an environment conducive for research
and research training
• Slogan: “To support the supervisor to supervise”– through collaboration with universities in Sweden
or elsewhere
Approach
11
SPECIFIC GOALS AND ACTIVITIES
RELATED TO RESEARCH
Strengthening research coordination and evaluation
12
• Policy for research coordination• Strengthen the DRGT• Improve research funding• Review the research manual with clear
processes and guidelines
Improving research skills of staff
13
• Train university staff in research skills • Integrate transferable skills and
Internalize research training courses• Enhance professional & research-related
academic programmes (cross cutting courses)
Increased utilisation of research results
14
Publication of local newsletters and journalsSupport participation at scientific
dissemination conferencesStrengthen linkages with research usersOperationalize the research agenda in
identified priority areasInstitute research related appraisal of staff
(Research Audit)
Enhancing the quality of research
15
• Establish and strengthen research networks & linkages with local and intern. research centres
• Strengthen research infrastructure • Strengthen the quality, IRB and ethics
committee
16
• Directorate of Research & Graduate Training (formerly the School of Graduate Studies)
• Directorate of Information and Communication Technology Services (DICTS)
• Gender Mainstreaming Directorate• The University Library• Agriculture (now CAES)• Technology (now CEDAT)• College of Health Sciences (CHS)• Arts and Social Sciences (now CHS)
Supported Units
Level of SupportPHASE AMOUNT (SEK)
(millions)AMOUNT
(USD $) (millions)
Preparatory Phase (2000-2001)
15.0 2.1
Phase I (2001 – 2005)
104.11 15.0
Phase II (2005 – 2009)
181 25.9
Phase III (2010 – 2014)
181.0 25.9
Exchange rate – 1 USD ~ 7 SEK (Grant Total - 480million SEK)17
18
• PhD training (tuition and research costs)• Support to supervisors to link with their
counterparts in Sweden• PhD students /supervisors travel grants to
attend scientific conferences• Small Faculty research funds• Competitive research grants, cross cutting
courses, Demographic surveillance site (DSS)
Forms of Support
19
• Support to GIS and Cross Cutting Biomedical Laboratory
• Support for ICT Infrastructure and Library resources• Independent univ-wide research fund at DRGT• Supporting dissemination strategies/ conferences,
publications• Admin & Coordination of the programme (DRGT)• Supporting regional collaborations and networks
Forms of Support>>
20
Fruits out of the support
21
• 102 (61 Male, 41 Female) Ph.Ds (15 have graduated), 67 Masters graduated) Masters, 20 postdoc research teams
• Research projects by supervisors in partnership with Swedish Faculty
• ICT and Library services (email, internet, online journals)• More quality publications coming out (Improved University
Rankings)• More linkages: CARTA, DRUSSA, CAPREX, Carnegie, NORHED,
Wellcome (Competitive grants)• Faculty small grants to support junior researchers from Social
sciences, Agriculture, Technology and CHS.• Supporting thematic research by providing for purchase of
equipment, consumables, travel, subsistence and guest lecturers
Promoting Research
DSS and Biomedical lab
22
• Demographic Surveillance Site (DSS)-Site now fully operational and data collection continues in an area of 72,000 people (old area) involving 16,000- households and another 90,000 people (new area for TB study)
• Biomedical Laboratory- Dept of Pharmacology in CHS- Laboratory now fully functional and can be accessed
by students and researchers
23
• State of the art GIS unit set up in the CEDAT
• Laboratory now fully functional and can be accessed by interested researchers & students
GIS Lab
24
• Optical fibre network covers main campus, Medicine, MUARIK, MUBS
• 132 computers and LANS set up in supported faculties• 12 student kiosks with 165 computers set up in various
units• All (100%) Colleges/units have web presence
compared to 5% in 2000• More than 30,000 e-mail users registered on the local
mail system compared to 50 in 2000• Internet connectivity is well maintained to provide a
rich global research resource
ICT
25
• 171 data points (computers) installed in the main library and 28 points at Albert Cook Library
• A functional Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)• More than 15,000 (end of 2012) journals on-line giving
countrywide access to recent literature• Now (2013) 40 e-journals databases, 22,000 titles
subscribed & 16 free ones accessed • With Bergen University, Library staff and EASLIS have
trained University of Juba staff and supporting library automation (spin off)
Library
2626
Gender• Increased visibility, acceptability and upward
movement of women into leadership positions– 5 full professors cf to 1 in 2000 (as of April 2011)
• Commitment to Gender Mainstreaming by the university e.g. increased representation on various committees, transformed to a Directorate
• Continued implementation of Gender plan in the new strategic plan (2008/09-2018/19)
• Gender Policy and Policy & Regulation on sexual harassment, and to engender the HR manual
• Makerere is still recognised as a pace setter in gender mainstreaming in Universities in sub Saharan Africa
26
27
Course 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
F M F M F M F M F M
Philosophy of methods
8 12 13 17 17 25 16 31 54 85 139
Adv. Gender Research
10 14 17 13 9 10 7 10 43 47 90
Statistical Computer applications
5 5 4 6 7 8 5 10 21 29 50
Genes and genomes
14 6 6 14 20
Supervision 11 23 8 16 8 10 12 16 39 65 104Research Management
- - - - 15 14 12 14 27 28 55
Scholarly writing & comm skills
- - - - 13 12 16 10 29 22 51
Information competence & mgt
19 25 11 21 3 9 12 13 45 68 108
Research Methodology
15 11 - - 12 17 16 14 43 42 85
Grand TT 543
CROSS-CUTING COURSE CONDUCTED 2010 TO 2013
Other skills enhancement courses, 2010-2011
28
Course Males Females Total
Supervision and mentorship
65 39 104
Research management
28 27 55
RBM
Financial Management for Coordinators, Admin & students on Sida prog (once a year) – Feb 2014
29
Enhanced research Culture (DRGT)
• More partnerships developed and funded– CARTA, CAPREX, DRUSSA partnerships– NORHED grant to 8 projects (Appx. $25m) to strength training – Next generation of Academics – CCNY ($2.6 million)– CCNY - Ph.D in Social Sciences and competitive grants
• Benchmarking best practices from the collaboration– Ph.D now by public defence– Ph.D supervisors cease being examiners– Candidates can publish their work before graduation– Thesis can be submitted in form of papers/monographs
30
Creation of centers of excellence• Health
– Malaria, TB, HIV, Mental health, Reproductive health• Technology and engineering
– Centre for research in energy and energy conservation (CREEC)
– Innovation systems and Clusters• Agriculture: Centre for Crop Waste Management• ICT – regional center• Library – e-resources
31
Impact• Sida support to Makerere has:
– Strengthened the position of Makerere as a leading provider of Science education and research
– Enabled the development of centres of excellence in health, agriculture, technology, humanities & social sciences
– Research influenced Gov’t policies (malaria, energy, waste, land, conflict)
32
Impact (cont—d)- Contributed to the modernisation of Mak through ICT and
library facilities hence increased transparency in governance and efficiency in university operations (national benefit)
- Improved the quality of academic staff and graduates through support for PhD training, enhanced capacity to supervise, to conduct research and to publish (national benefit)
- Contributed substantially to the attainment of NDP hence reduce poverty levels and attainment of MDGs (nat. & Intern benefit).
- Reduced the degree of brain drain (national benefit)
Challenges• Procurement process delays
– Decentralization may expedite the process
• Audit delays by Auditor General– Early appointment of auditors
• Low Consumption of funds by some units• Delays in submission of Annual Reports• Understaffing poses constraint to research
coordination
33
34
• Underfunding by the govt hence difficult to recruit and retain staff (50% establishment)
• Inadequate infrastructure including limited bandwidth
• Limited research funds to generate innovations and policies for poverty alleviation
Challenges>>
Challenge: Procurement
• Remains problematic• Failure of researchers to appreciate the law
(sometimes stubbornness)• Limited appreciation by procurement and disposal
unit and contracts committee that researcher’s needs are unique
36
• Sourcing for more research funding and to build a strong environment to support innovations and knowledge translation
• Engage in multidisciplinary research teams/themes with greater focus on postdoctoral training, mentorship and innovations.
• Strengthen scientific corporation with Swedish institutions to compete for research funding
Recommendations
Procurement recommendations
• Submit approved plans and costs in the project for speedy action by contracts committee
• Information about the Pre-qualified list of reputable companies/ suppliers
• Continuous sensitisation of researchers on procurement process
To Improve Management
• Clear separation of roles among stakeholders (SC, PIC, DRGT Coordination office, Coordinators at units, Researchers, Accountants, Ph.D student
• Refer to Standard Operating Procedures that define how the funds and assets acquired are to be managed for the benefit of all interested individuals in the project
Recommendations>>>
• Coordinators to stimulate their researchers to work following agreed time lines
• DRGT, PIC and SC to routinely liaise with coordinators and researchers to identify constraints and put in place corrective measures
• DRGT and Coordinators to follow up large procurements
• Need to increase involvement of Swedish supervisors in planning, reporting and dissemination of findings
Way Forward>>
• Research coordination and management to be improved (College Grants Office)
• Communication both ways to be enhanced (especially financial information)
• Regular mini audits by finance dept and DRGT• Coordinators and researchers to plan ahead for their activities
(avoid last minute request from units)• Researchers to budget properly for the activities to be carried
out to avoid delays• Funds are now centralised but budgets are managed by the
coordinators. Are they really doing this well?
40
Accountability
• Nightmare for researchers, how can unit Accountants help?
• Continuous re-fresher training of researchers in budgeting and accountability (Navision recently)
• No more advances for similar item unless previous one is accounted for
• All to appreciate that it is a requirement (travel: boarding passes, ticket stabs etc)
Communication
• Has been stepped up, documents cleared very quickly,
• Information about accounts to be posted to coordinators via Navision software every month (accountants should regularly share information with DRGT accounts office)
43