Top Banner
Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter
10

Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Dec 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE

Wilfried Winiwarter

Page 2: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

ECLAIRE

• Measurements at different scales• Modelling at different scales• Integrated Risk Assessment

and Policy Tools

• http://www.eclaire-fp7.eu/• Coordinated by CEH Edinburgh

(Mark Sutton)

Page 3: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

The GAINS model

Minimized costs

Share unabated

ImpactsEmissions DepositionActivity E.Factors

Share abated

Optimization target

Page 4: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Results of field experiments

– Birch trees (F. Hayes): # of leaves, biomass, cross-sectional area

– Oak AG biomass (G. Gerosa) NOT: hornbeams, root biomass

– Annual pastures: O3 reduces fertilization effects (R. Alonso)

– NDVI, leaf weight, chlorophyll content (C. Amann)NOT: biomass

• Higher ozone concentration damage• Combined with N deposition damage corrected (or:

decreased NUE)

Page 5: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Optimization boundary conditions

• Only one dimension (endpoint) possible: conversions needed

• Practical experience with – largely – synergetic endpoints–Air pollution – climate change– “multi-effect” protocol

• Here: opposing effectsIs ozone or nitrogen more important?

Page 6: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Cost benefit analysis

van

Grin

sven

et a

l. 20

13

Page 7: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Valuation of ecosystems services

• Framework (Mike Holland)–Quantification of benefits–Treat those services qualitatively, for

which quantification can not be given

–Here: additional forest biomass due to N–Quantification of biodiversity value is

difficult

Focus on market values ?

Page 8: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Bateman et al. 2013

Page 9: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Biodiversity indicators

“No net loss of biodiversity”

Endpoints:• Species number / preferential species• Red list species / sensitive species• Indicator species

• E.g. “relative environmental sustainability” or “positive indicator species” concepts

Page 10: Challenges in using indicators to quantify ecosystems services for a CBA in the framework of ECLAIRE Wilfried Winiwarter.

Conclusions

“No net loss of biodiversity”

Endpoints:• Species number• Red list species• Indicator species

• E.g. “relative environmental sustainability” or “positive indicator species” concepts